The Call of the Barking Geckos (Gekkonidae : Reptilia)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Call of the Barking Geckos (Gekkonidae : Reptilia) SCIENT. PAP. NAMIB DESERT RES. STN, NC). 46 83 THE CALL OF THE BARKING GECKOS (GEKKONIDAE : REPTILIA) by W. D. HAACKE Transvaal Museum. Pretoria (With 4 figures and 1 colour plate) interpretations. Brain (1962), when revising the genus and describing P. carpi, repeated most of fie Gekkonjdae are the only lizards with true them, adding his own observations and mentioning cal abilities and of this group the southern a call heard by Dr, Koch at Gobabeb, which had rican genus Ptenopux js probably one of the more clicks and followed in quicker succession than )st vociferous. The call mnsists of a series of is known for gnr~ulm.It was then assumed to haw quick ) clicks, ticks or chirps, which are uttered in been the call of carpi, but was later found by the 1 succession. 1 Calls are usually uttered in reply to author to be thaJ of koc?~i,a species still undescribed 0 others, for which reason the type species was called in 2 1962. When describing kochi in 1964 the author d Ptenopus garrulus. When describing this species in first mentioned a different call for each of the e t 1849, Sir Andrew Smith wrote: thrce species. At that stage it had aIready been a d noticed that not only a remarkable interspecific ( Tn the localities in which it occurs, many jndividuaIs r may be seen peeping from their hiding places, each but also intraspecific variation in the calls existed e h uttering a sha~sound, somewhat like chick, chick; and that fluctuations in humidity and ternpr?rature s i and the number thus occupied is at times so great and l affected the reaction of She geckos. Since then an b the noise so disagreeable, as to cause the traveller to u change h is quarters." attempt has been made to obtain more detaiIed P e information about the call of Ptenop~cs,especially h t At present three species are known, of which two P. gwrulus. The above-mentioned onomatopoeic re- y were described within the last seven years. Each productions might, ta some extent. reproduce the b d species has a characteristic call. Ptmopus is a sound and give some impression of the call, but, e t terrestrial genus and each specimen lives in a self- unless actual recordings are available, do not suppIy n a made burrow. The call is uttered by the male only any information regarding the duration, rhythm, r g and the functional significance is still uncertain pjtch and other characteristics which are even more e c but probably is associated with territoriality and difficult to describe. Because of these shortcomings n e e attraction of females. Vocal activity usually an attempt was made to produce better comparative c i l arts towards sunset. reaching its peak just after means tape recordings subsequent material by of and r nset e before darkness falls. Silence usually foll- analyses. d vds, but loud choruses may continue right through n clicks u Each call consists of a series of uttered in the night and isolated calls may be heard during y quick succession. Although Broughton (1963: 16) a the day. No calls are heard during the winter w and even in there may be silence defines '"the shortest unitary rhythm element of e months summer t fo. sound emission that can readily be distinguished as a r weeks. The ~rrelationbetween season, weather such by the unaided human ear" as a 'chirp', the G an ~dvocal activity is still not clear. t author wrefers the term 'click' for the individual e n sound is i Since the original description by Smith a number pulses of which a caII consists, as it a b have and better description of these staccato sounds. A con- a authors described the call Loveridge S 947: 35) summarized the various onomatopoeic siderabIe variation in the number of cLicks per call y b d e c u d o r p e R 84 DR. FITZSEMONS COMMEMORATIVE VOLUME and the rate at which the clicks were uttered has of the Research Station at Gobabeb, while other been observed. observations were made during various trips to the northern Transvaal, Botswana, the northcrn Capc There has been some speculation in the past con- Province and South West Africa. In a number of cerning the sound-producing mechanism involved, places the frequency distribution of the number of and Loveridge (1947: 14 quoted by Brain 19621 clicks per call was established by writjng dawn the assumed that the sound was produced by "the number of cIicks for a long series of calls at a given sudden removal of the fleshy tongue from contact locality. This was done for P. garrulus only, as in with the palate'bwhile Goin and Goin (1962 : 267) the call of kochi the repetition rate of the clicks thought "that the sound is perhaps produced by is so high that it: is impossible to make accurate clicking the broad tongue agajnst the roof of the counts, while on the few occasions that the call mouth." As the larynx of gekkonids has membran- which is assumed to be that of carpi was heard, eous folds which can be considered to be vocal chords no recording material was avaiIable. (Keleman 1963 : 491 and Tembrock 1959: 37), this family is the only one amongst the lizards with true The recordings were a11 made on a NAGRA ID vocal abilities. The presence and structure of this portable tape-recorder and a Beyer M88 microphone organ has not yet been investigated in Ptenopm, was used. The recordings in the central Namib but, as this genus is so exceptionalIy vocal, it is Desert were made by placing the microphone on provisionally accepted that the larynx is well the ground about 12 inches away from the hole of developed and that the sounds are produced by It. the gecko, while in the Gernsbok Park the micm- phone was used in connection with a 36 inch para- The function of the call is still uncertain. Mertens bolic reflector. The recordings were analysed on a (1946: 36) suggests that it is part of territorial Kay Electronic "Sona-Graph" 6061A while us in^ behaviour, but may also serve to attract females. a narrow band selector. A frequency spectrum of a This is possible, as no two holes were observed to signal Is thus obtained. Signals or parts of signals be closer together than about two feet, which may tasting not more than 2.4 seconds and a frequency indicate that females also show some degree of range betwecn 85 cycles and 8 kilocycles arc territoriality, which is unusual. However, as only r~cordedon a strip of spe-ial paper. This recording malcs have been observed calling, it is uncertain in is known as a "sonagram" (Andrieu 1963: 42) and what way females would define their territory. It by using the scale marked on The recording drum ) has been observed that the female of the Tokeh 1 of the "Sona-Graph'" the various time factors 1 (Gekko gecko) is attracted by the call of the male 0 involved can be measured. The total time for various 2 (Mertens op. dt.). During the middle of October calls and their "puhe repetition rate" (Broughton d e 1965 on the farm De Waal, Gobabis district, South The t 1963: 6) was thus established. first measur- a West Africa, just after dark, six specimens of ement was obtained by measuring the distance d ( were in P, garrulus colIected while running the between the beginning of the first and the end of r e road in the lights of an oncoming truck. At the the last cIick, while the second was estabIished by h s time other geckos were still calling. As all the i measuring the time-lapse between the beginning of l b spmimens collected were females, it is possjbIe that each pair of consecutive clicks in a call. For lack u this was a case where the females were responding P accurate of a more term one of the latter measur- e to the call of the males. h ements is hereafter referred to as an "interval". No. t attempt was made at this stage to evaluate the y Hunsaker et al. (1968) found indications that b certain geckos, for example Hemidactylecs, may not frequencies of each click. d e be able to hear their own calls, as their auditory t According to the Davis (1948) system the loci n thresholds are not in a direct reIationship to their a of the localities where these observations were made r vocaI ability. Although electro-physiological expe- g are as follows: Annisfontein 1628 Ed, Daberas 1628 e riments have not yet been carried out with Pteno- c DC,De Waal 1823 Bd, Gobabeb 1523 Ca,Gorob Mine n pus, to check their hearing, behavioural observations e 1523 Cb, Hotsas 1522 Ca, Nossob Camp 2025 BC, c i certainly showed clear reactions to the calls of other l Sendelingsdrif 1628 Bb, Swartpoort 1628 Eb. r individuals. e d n u DISCUSSION AND RESULTS y METHODS AND MATERIAL a w Ptenopus garmlus (Smith) e As Ptenopug rarely calls in captivity, all the t a recordings and behavioural observations had to be Under normal conditions garrulus calk in the G made in the field. Distress and agressive calls as late afternoon towards sunset, with greatest activity t e defined by Hunsaker et al. (1968) are ignored in just after sunset, quietening down rather abruptly n i b this paper. Tape-recordings were only made at the as soon as darkness falls, However, especially during a Camp S Nossob in the Kalahari Gemsbok National rainy weather, loud concerts may continue through y Park and in the central Namib Desert in the vicinity the night, only stopping after sunrise.
Recommended publications
  • The Development and Improvement of Instructions
    SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN THE Sceloporus undulatus SPECIES COMPLEX A Thesis by DREW EDWIN DITTMER Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE August 2012 Major Subject: Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences Sexual Dimorphism in the Sceloporus undulatus species complex Copyright 2012 Drew Edwin Dittmer SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN THE Sceloporus undulatus SPECIES COMPLEX A Thesis by DREW EDWIN DITTMER Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Approved by: Co-Chairs of Committee, Toby J. Hibbitts Lee A. Fitzgerald Committee Member, James B. Woolley Head of Department, John B. Carey August 2012 Major Subject: Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences iii ABSTRACT Sexual Dimorphism in the Sceloporus undulatus Species Complex. (August 2012) Drew Edwin Dittmer, B.S., University of Missouri-Columbia Co-Chairs of Advisory Committee: Dr. Toby J. Hibbitts Dr. Lee A. Fitzgerald The Fence Lizard (Sceloporus undulatus complex) is a wide ranging North American species complex occurring from the eastern seaboard westward through the great plains and central Rocky Mountains and into the American Southwest. A recent phylogeny suggests four species lineages occur within S. undulatus. Traits within an interbreeding species that are influenced by sexual selection are under different selection pressures and may evolve independently from the selective forces of habitat. Sceloporus lizards have several characters that are influenced by sexual selection. I investigated sexual size dimorphism and allometric relationships of body size (snout vent length), torso length, rear leg length and three measurements of head size in 12 populations from the four species in the S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology of the Common Barking Gecko (Ptenopus Garrulus) in Southern Africa
    SHORTER COMMUNICATIONS 509 VANZOLINI, P. E. 1972: Miscellaneous notes on the Anolis transversalis (Squamata: Polychrotidae). Jour- ecology of some Brazilian lizards. Pape´is Avulsos nal of Herpetology 37:276–285. de Zoologia, Sa˜o Paulo 26:83–115. VRCIBRADIC, D., AND C. F. D. ROCHA. 1996. Ecological VITT, L. J., T. C. S. A´ VILA-PIRES, AND P. Z ANI. 1996. differences in tropical sympatric skinks (Mabuya Observations on the ecology of the rare Amazonian macrorhyncha and Mabuya agilis) in southeastern lizard Enyalius leechii (Polychrotidae). Herpetolog- Brazil. Journal of Herpetology 30:60–67. ical Natural History 4:77–82. ZAMPROGNO, C., M. G. F. ZAMPROGNO, AND R. L. TEIXEIRA. VITT, L. J., R. A. SOUZA,S.S.SARTORIUS,T.C.S.A´ VILA- 2001. Evidence of terrestrial feeding in the arboreal PIRES, AND M. C. ESPO´ SITO. 2000. Comparative lizard Enyalius bilineatus (Sauria, Polychrotidae) of ecology of sympatric Gonatodes (Squamata: Gekko- southeastern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Biologia nidae) in the western Amazon of Brazil. Copeia 61:91–94. 2000:83–95. ZAR, J. H. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis. 2nd edition. VITT, L. J., T. C. S. A´ VILA-PIRES,M.C.ESPO´ SITO,S.S. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. SARTORIUS, AND P. A. ZANI. 2003. Sharing Amazonian rain-forest trees: ecology of Anolis punctatus and Accepted: 18 May 2005. Journal of Herpetology, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 509–515, 2005 Copyright 2005 Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Ecology of the Common Barking Gecko (Ptenopus garrulus) in Southern Africa 1,2 3 4 1 TOBY J. HIBBITTS, ERIC R.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History Database
    Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History database Abdala, C. S., A. S. Quinteros, and R. E. Espinoza. 2008. Two new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the puna of northwestern Argentina. Herpetologica 64:458-471. Abdala, C. S., D. Baldo, R. A. Juárez, and R. E. Espinoza. 2016. The first parthenogenetic pleurodont Iguanian: a new all-female Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. Copeia 104:487-497. Abdala, C. S., J. C. Acosta, M. R. Cabrera, H. J. Villaviciencio, and J. Marinero. 2009. A new Andean Liolaemus of the L. montanus series (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. South American Journal of Herpetology 4:91-102. Abdala, C. S., J. L. Acosta, J. C. Acosta, B. B. Alvarez, F. Arias, L. J. Avila, . S. M. Zalba. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las lagartijas y anfisbenas de la República Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 26 (Suppl. 1):215-248. Abell, A. J. 1999. Male-female spacing patterns in the lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Amphibia-Reptilia 20:185-194. Abts, M. L. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of the Chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Ecological Monographs 57:215-232. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2003. Anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: Facultad de Ciencias. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2007. Anfibio y reptiles del Uruguay, 3rd edn. Montevideo, Uruguay: Serie Fauna 1. Ackermann, T. 2006. Schreibers Glatkopfleguan Leiocephalus schreibersii. Munich, Germany: Natur und Tier. Ackley, J. W., P. J. Muelleman, R. E. Carter, R. W. Henderson, and R. Powell. 2009. A rapid assessment of herpetofaunal diversity in variously altered habitats on Dominica.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural History Notes 435
    NATURAL HISTORY NOTES 435 it exploits woody debris and bank vegetation as cover (Scott and Angermeier 1998, op. cit.). This would place it in close proximity to invertebrates and vertebrates that perch on branches, sticks, roots, and tree trunks. The present study adds further evidence that the putative chemical defense of P. fasciatus failed to protect the skink from predation from another group of vertebrates. Clearly the tail did not inhibit consumption by Micropterus henshalli, nor did the capacity of the skink to autotomize its tail as a predator diversion tactic. In all likelihood, the skink was ambushed by the bass and loss of the tail would have come too late to serve as an effective diversion as it might have against more visual predators such as birds and small mammals. JAMES B. MCCLINTOCK (e-mail: [email protected]), ROBERT A. AN- GUS (e-mail: [email protected]), and KEN R. MARION (e-mail: kmarion@ uab.edu), Department of Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA. FIG. 1. Plestiodon fasciatus in mouth and gullet of an Alabama Bass (Micropterus henshalli). PODARCIS MURALIS (Common Wall Lizard). COMMUNAL NESTING. Ovoposition strategies vary among species and even approximately 14 cm from snout to tail tip (Fig. 1). The skink, within the same species. One of these strategies is communal while completely intact, was dead, most likely from drowning. nesting. The “constraint” (nests with optimal conditions for lay- The head of the skink protruded from the mouth of the bass (Fig. ing eggs are scarce) and the “adaptation” (a fitness benefit due to 1), but the mid and lower body and tail of the skink were in the egg aggregation) are two reasons why female lizards lay their eggs fish’s gullet (JBM, pers.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist and Provisional Conservation Status of Namibian Reptiles
    Annotated Checklist - Reptiles Page 1 ANNOTATED CHECKLIST AND PROVISIONAL CONSERVATION STATUS OF NAMIBIAN REPTILES MICHAEL GRIFFIN BIODIVERSITY INVENTORY MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND TOURISM PRIVATE BAG 13306 WINDHOEK NAMIBIA Annotated Checklist - Reptiles Page 2 Annotated Checklist - Reptiles Page 3 CONTENTS PAGE ABSTRACT 5 INTRODUCTION 5 METHODS AND DEFINITIONS 6 SPECIES ACCOUNTS Genus Crocodylus Nile Crocodile 11 Pelomedusa Helmeted Terrapin 11 Pelusios Hinged Terrapins 12 Geochelone Leopard Tortoise 13 Chersina Bowsprit Tortoise 14 Homopus Nama Padloper 14 Psammobates Tent Tortoises 15 Kinixys Hinged Tortoises 16 Chelonia GreenTurtle 16 Lepidochelys Olive Ridley Turtle 17 Dermochelys Leatherback Turtle 17 Trionyx African Soft-shelled Turtle 18 Afroedura Flat Geckos 19 Goggia Dwarf Leaf-toed Geckos 20 Afrogecko Marbled Leaf-toed Gecko 21 Phelsuma Namaqua Day Gecko 22 Lygodactylus Dwarf Geckos 23 Rhoptropus Namib Day Geckos 25 Chondrodactylus Giant Ground Gecko 27 Colopus Kalahari Ground Gecko 28 Palmatogecko Web-footed Geckos 28 Pachydactylus Thick-toed Geckos 29 Ptenopus Barking Geckos 39 Narudasia Festive Gecko 41 Hemidactylus Tropical House Geckos 41 Agama Ground Agamas 42 Acanthocercus Tree Agama 45 Bradypodion Dwarf Chameleons 46 Chamaeleo Chameleons 47 Acontias Legless Skinks 48 Typhlosaurus Blind Legless Skinks 48 Sepsina Burrowing Skinks 50 Scelotes Namibian Dwarf Burrowing Skink 51 Typhlacontias Western Burrowing Skinks 51 Lygosoma Sundevall’s Writhing Skink 53 Mabuya Typical Skinks 53 Panaspis Snake-eyed Skinks 60 Annotated
    [Show full text]
  • Communication and Sexual Selection in the Barking Gecko(Ptenopus
    Communication and Sexual Selection in the Barking Gecko (Ptenopus kochi) Daniel Adam Polakow Town Submittedfor fulfilment Capeofthe degree Master ofScience (MSc)of University Department ofZoology University of Cape To'!Il ' •I ,, " ;r ,.:;~,~.~~- r ' • • 'l•ob ' "'' , I I' ~" • 1 • 'l " f, .t ..h or. • (' - - .... ~ , Jo - - ;:. __ ...........,. ·~· ·~~ ·~ ·~, ·--..:. :.!-r:' . ..;c: -: .. ~ . ? ...~. ~·::. The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town To Joshua Julian, Inessa Triton, Peter, Apollo Russell, Lisa, Danielle, Pan and Nicolas - the most beautiful people in my world. ' Won 't you help to sing, these songs offreedom ... ' Bob Marley Redemption Song (1980) 11 Abstract This study focused on elucidating the functional significance of some aspects of the behaviour of Koch's barking gecko, Ptenopus kochi, during a field season conducted at the Desert Ecology Research Unit in Namibia for four months in 1995. Ptenopus kochi is a terrestrial species, and males were observed calling from their burrow entrances in the' dry Kuiseb river bed during the hot sununer months. First, aspects of competition among calling males were investigated. Calling males were seen to be non-randomly distributed relative to one another with evidence for regularity of spacing in dense aggregations. Sound intensity was investigated as the mechanism of spacing, and was mathematically modelled to gauge how the intensities of the calls of nearest-neighbour males overlapped.
    [Show full text]
  • DESCRIPTION of TWO NEW SPECIES of LIZARDS and NOTES on FITZSIMONSIA Iabrtfipes (FITZSIMONS) from the CENTRAL NAME DESERT
    SCIEhT. PAP. NAMIB DES. RES. STATION, NO. !25 DESCRIPTION OF TWO NEW SPECIES OF LIZARDS AND NOTES ON FITZSIMONSIA IABRTfIPES (FITZSIMONS) FROM THE CENTRAL NAME DESERT. W. D. HAACRE Transvaal Museum, Pretoria. (With 3 figures and 6 plates) Introduction: I would Iike to thank Drs. V. F. FitzSirnons and C. Koch for assistance rendered in preparing this Amwgst the reptile specimens in the collection manuscript and Mr. C. J. Coetzee for help with the of the Transvaal Museum from the Gobabeb area statistics. in the central Namib Desert two new species were recognized. Atso one species which was hitherto known only by the type with no definite locality Ptenoprls ko& sp. nov. ) record. proved to be relatively common in that area. 1 1 j (Plates I-V) 0 This investigation proved the presence of a third 2 named d species of the harking geckos of the genus Ptenopm. Koch's Barking Gecko, after Dr. C. e t Until a few years ago when Brain described P. cavi Koch who collected the first specimen and reported a d There, from Gobabeb, this genus was considered mono- the unusual gecko calls from Gobabeb. at ( type this species, mainly through r specific. Now a third species has been recognized the locality for e h from that same area. Although the type species his energy and devotion, the Namib Desert Research s i l P. garrulw has a wide distribution throughout the Station has been erected, which made further stu- b u drier sandy areas of Southern Africa, the two new dies and collections possible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecology of Lizard Reproductive Output
    Global Ecology and Biogeography, (Global Ecol. Biogeogr.) (2011) ••, ••–•• RESEARCH The ecology of lizard reproductive PAPER outputgeb_700 1..11 Shai Meiri1*, James H. Brown2 and Richard M. Sibly3 1Department of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, ABSTRACT 69978 Tel Aviv, Israel, 2Department of Biology, Aim We provide a new quantitative analysis of lizard reproductive ecology. Com- University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA and Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde parative studies of lizard reproduction to date have usually considered life-history Park Road, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA, 3School components separately. Instead, we examine the rate of production (productivity of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, hereafter) calculated as the total mass of offspring produced in a year. We test ReadingRG6 6AS, UK whether productivity is influenced by proxies of adult mortality rates such as insularity and fossorial habits, by measures of temperature such as environmental and body temperatures, mode of reproduction and activity times, and by environ- mental productivity and diet. We further examine whether low productivity is linked to high extinction risk. Location World-wide. Methods We assembled a database containing 551 lizard species, their phyloge- netic relationships and multiple life history and ecological variables from the lit- erature. We use phylogenetically informed statistical models to estimate the factors related to lizard productivity. Results Some, but not all, predictions of metabolic and life-history theories are supported. When analysed separately, clutch size, relative clutch mass and brood frequency are poorly correlated with body mass, but their product – productivity – is well correlated with mass. The allometry of productivity scales similarly to metabolic rate, suggesting that a constant fraction of assimilated energy is allocated to production irrespective of body size.
    [Show full text]
  • The Burrowing Geckos of Southern Africa 5 1976.Pdf
    ANNALS OF THE TRANSVAAL MUSEUM ANNALE VAN DIE TRANSVAAL-MUSEUM- < VOL. 30 30 JUNE 1976 No. 6 THE BURROWING GECKOS OF SOUTHERN AFRICA, 5 (REPTILIA: GEKKONIDAE) By W.D. HAACKE Transvaal lvIllseum, Pretoria (With four Text-figures) ABSTRACT This study deals with the entirely terrestrial genera of southern African geckos and is published in five parts in this journal. In this part the phylogenetic and taxono­ mic affinities of these genera based on pupil shape and hand and foot structure are discussed. PHYLOGENETIC AND TAXONOMIC AFFINITIES In his classification of the Gekkonidae, Underwood (1954) placed six South African genera into the subfamily Diplodactylinae. These genera, i.e. Cho!ldrodac~ylus, Colopus, Palmatogecko, Rhoptropus, Rhoptropella and Ptmopus were supposed to share a peculiar variant of the straight vertical pupil which he called Rhoptropus-type. He notes that all of them occur in "desert or veldt" and appear to be adapted to the special conditions of South Africa. He further states that "Such a number of genera with several peculiar forms of feet in such a restricted area is somewhat surprising". At that time all except Rhoptropuswere considered to be monotypic genera. Since then two more species of Ptmopus and also the terrestrial, obviously related genus Kaokogecko have been described. In the present paper a special study has been made of the ground­ living, burrowing genera, which excludes Rhoptropus and Rhoptropella. Although it has been pointed out that the classification of the Gekkonidae according to the form of the digits (Boulenger, 1885) and the shape of the pupil (Underwood, 1954) is unsatisfactory (Stephenson, 1960; Kluge, 72 1964 and 1967) the possibilities of these characters as taxonomic indicators were reinvestigated in the genera in question and related forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Hemidactylus Frenatus
    ACOUSTIC BEHAVIOR OF THE GEKKONID LIZARD, HEMIDACTYLUS FRENATUS ABSTRACT:The present study demonstrates that Hemidactyltis frenatus has a vocal repertory of three functionally, physically distinct calls that are important in its social behavior. The multiple chirp (MC) call is the most common and is closely associated with agonistic behavior and territorial defense. The MC call has a consistent temporal pattern of chirps, and call rate varies directly with air temperature. Die1 calling periodicity was investigated for the MC call and calls were observed to in- crease from dusk to a high in the early morning hours. Increasing call counts were positively correlated with numbers of active geckos. The churr call is infrequently heard, occurring only during aggres- sive encounters between $ $, and is thought to function as intimidation. The single chirp (SC) call is frequently heard and is closely associated with distress. The SC call may facilitate escape from predators. The acoustic behavior of H. jrenatus is compared to that of other species of geckos and some correlates found. MOST reptiles do not utilize sounds as produce distinct vocalizations. The family intraspecific comn~unicationsignals, but at Gekkonidae is noted for its vocal abilities least some members of the four major sur- which are thought to be of importance in viving orders have been reported to vocal- intraspecific communication. ize in social situations (Busnel, 1963). In The significance of gccko sounds has most lizards sound production is lacking, been a source of controversy and specu- or is limited to hissing, but a few can lation for years. Functional suggestions HERPETOLOCICA30:44-52.
    [Show full text]
  • Reptiles & Amphibians
    AWF FOUR CORNERS TBNRM PROJECT : REVIEWS OF EXISTING BIODIVERSITY INFORMATION i Published for The African Wildlife Foundation's FOUR CORNERS TBNRM PROJECT by THE ZAMBEZI SOCIETY and THE BIODIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR AFRICA 2004 PARTNERS IN BIODIVERSITY The Zambezi Society The Biodiversity Foundation for Africa P O Box HG774 P O Box FM730 Highlands Famona Harare Bulawayo Zimbabwe Zimbabwe Tel: +263 4 747002-5 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.biodiversityfoundation.org Website : www.zamsoc.org The Zambezi Society and The Biodiversity Foundation for Africa are working as partners within the African Wildlife Foundation's Four Corners TBNRM project. The Biodiversity Foundation for Africa is responsible for acquiring technical information on the biodiversity of the project area. The Zambezi Society will be interpreting this information into user-friendly formats for stakeholders in the Four Corners area, and then disseminating it to these stakeholders. THE BIODIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR AFRICA (BFA is a non-profit making Trust, formed in Bulawayo in 1992 by a group of concerned scientists and environmentalists. Individual BFA members have expertise in biological groups including plants, vegetation, mammals, birds, reptiles, fish, insects, aquatic invertebrates and ecosystems. The major objective of the BFA is to undertake biological research into the biodiversity of sub-Saharan Africa, and to make the resulting information more accessible. Towards this end it provides technical, ecological and biosystematic expertise. THE ZAMBEZI SOCIETY was established in 1982. Its goals include the conservation of biological diversity and wilderness in the Zambezi Basin through the application of sustainable, scientifically sound natural resource management strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification and Description of World Formation Types
    CLASSIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION OF WORLD FORMATION TYPES PART II. DESCRIPTION OF WORLD FORMATIONS (v 2.0) Hierarchy Revisions Working Group (Federal Geographic Data Committee) 2012 Don Faber-Langendoen, Todd Keeler-Wolf, Del Meidinger, Carmen Josse, Alan Weakley, Dave Tart, Gonzalo Navarro, Bruce Hoagland, Serguei Ponomarenko, Jean-Pierre Saucier, Gene Fults, Eileen Helmer This document is being developed for the U.S. National Vegetation Classification, the International Vegetation Classification, and other national and international vegetation classifications. July 18, 2012 This report was produced by NVC partners (NatureServe, Ecological Society of America, U.S. federal agencies) through the Federal Geographic Data Committee. Printed from NatureServe Biotics on 24 Jul 2012 Citation: Faber-Langendoen, D., T. Keeler-Wolf, D. Meidinger, C. Josse, A. Weakley, D. Tart, G. Navarro, B. Hoagland, S. Ponomarenko, J.-P. Saucier, G. Fults, E. Helmer. 2012. Classification and description of world formation types. Part I (Introduction) and Part II (Description of formation types, v2.0). Hierarchy Revisions Working Group, Federal Geographic Data Committee, FGDC Secretariat, U.S. Geological Survey. Reston, VA, and NatureServe, Arlington, VA. i Classification and Description of World Formation Types. Part II: Formation Descriptions, v2.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The work produced here was supported by the U.S. National Vegetation Classification partnership between U.S. federal agencies, the Ecological Society of America, and NatureServe staff, working through the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Vegetation Subcommittee. FGDC sponsored the mandate of the Hierarchy Revisions Working Group, which included incorporating international expertise into the process. For that reason, this product represents a collaboration of national and international vegetation ecologists.
    [Show full text]