DOCSLIB.ORG

How Is Public Education Funded in Maine? Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
How Is Public Education Funded in Maine? Introduction HOW IS PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDED IN MAINE? INTRODUCTION Of all Maine’s economic development strategies, This is not an exhaustive review of the entire public education has the greatest return on investment. education funding system. It covers major aspects Investment in education creates lifelong learners, of the system for the purpose of providing a simple opens pathways to promising careers, and grows the tool to support better policy decision-making. economy. It also produces civically engaged citizens who build vibrant communities. The policy brief series is brought to you through a partnership between Educate Maine and the Maine For the past four years, Educate Maine has published State Chamber of Commerce, and through the Education Indicators for Maine, a snapshot of Maine’s generous support of the John T. Gorman and Nellie education system presented through indicators that Mae Education Foundations. The production of the measure access, participation, and performance. report was made possible by the contributions of Lisa Plimpton (research), Frank O’Hara (writing), and Pica In addition to Education Indicators for Maine, Educate (design and layout). Maine has also published a series of policy briefs exploring specific issues related to educational achievement in depth, and making recommendations for strategic progress. This primer provides an overview of how public education is funded in Maine. Efective funding systems can promote student success, create greater equity of opportunity, and help to grow the economy. The challenge is that funding systems can also be so complicated that few people understand them. Unlike other briefs in this series, this primer contains no recommendations. Its purpose is simply explanatory. It is designed particularly for key education decision makers (school board members, state legislators, etc.) but should also be of interest to all Maine people. 482 CONGRESS ST., STE. 303 125 COMMUNITY DR. #101 PORTLAND, ME 04101 AUGUSTA, ME 04330 207-347-8638 207-623-4568 EDUCATEMAINE.ORG MAINECHAMBER.ORG 2 PRE-K TO 12: WHY IS THE STATE INVOLVED IN LOCAL SCHOOL FUNDING? “Maine has been regarded as a leader in equalizing After the referendum, Maine reconstructed its educational opportunity across its towns. While school aid program in a way that retained the general that leadership was most evident in the funding structure of giving more aid to poorer towns, but equalization formulas adopted in the 1970s, a state did so without the state collecting or disbursing commitment to ensuring educational opportunity has local property tax funds. The state instead allocated been evident since statehood.” (Dow and Townsend) revenues from income and sales tax funds to provide its share. In 2004, Maine voters passed a referendum From the very founding of the state in 1820, Maine’s directing state government to pay 55% of local Constitution has required all towns to make public school costs. education available to their youth. Very early on, in 1828, the State provided revenues to help towns with In 2005, the Legislature implemented the Essential financing this obligation. The first state school aid Programs and Services (EPS) funding model. came from revenues from public land sales, and it Prior to this law, state education funding levels had was distributed to municipalities based on a per-pupil been set based upon what the schools had spent Article VIII. Part First. Section 1. Legislature formula. In 1833, a banking tax was instituted to in the prior year. The EPS model directs the Maine shall require towns to support public schools; provide a more regular source of funds to support Department of Education to set the spending level duty of Legislature. education. In 1872, Maine created a School Mill Fund, for school aid based on independent research into which collected a one-mill property tax from all best practices that support student success. This is A general difusion of the advantages of education towns, and redistributed money back to the towns intended to ensure that state aid only goes to support being essential to the preservation of the rights on a per-pupil basis; this is the first instance of Maine what is needed for all students to meet state learning and liberties of the people; to promote this government redistributing resources across towns in standards (Maine Learning Results) and not to all important object, the Legislature are authorized, order to equalize student opportunity. budget items that local school boards might adopt. and it shall be their duty to require, the several Local districts maintain the right to spend local funds towns to make suitable provision, at their own After many refinements and changes over the years, above and beyond EPS levels and many do. expense, for the support and maintenance of in 1974 Maine passed the State Uniform Property Tax. public schools; and it shall further be their duty to In this system, the state collected a specified mill rate In 2016, voters approved a 3% surcharge on the encourage and suitably endow, from time to time, from all towns, matched the money with state funds, income tax for Maine households over $200,000; as the circumstances of the people may authorize, and distributed the funds to the schools. Some towns the Legislature and Governor repealed the tax, all academies, colleges and seminaries of learning with high property tax bases ended up paying in more but increased school funding by $162 million. within the State… than they got back. This proved to be unpopular, and And this is where we are today. the Uniform Property Tax was repealed by referendum Maine Constitution, 1820 in 1977. 482 CONGRESS ST., STE. 303 125 COMMUNITY DR. #101 PORTLAND, ME 04101 AUGUSTA, ME 04330 207-347-8638 207-623-4568 EDUCATEMAINE.ORG MAINECHAMBER.ORG 3 PRE-K TO 12: HOW MUCH IS SPENT AND WHO PAYS? Approximately $2.7 billion was spent on Pre-K to 12 Per student spending varies widely among Maine education in Maine during FY 2015 (most recent data). SOURCES OF PUBLIC ELEMENTARY & SECONDARY school districts. Though the state average is $12,939, The majority of revenue for public elementary and EDUCATION FUNDING IN MAINE, FY 2015 14 of Maine’s 240 districts spend less than $10,000 per secondary education—53%—is provided by municipal student, and 18 districts spend more than $20,000 per MUNICIPAL STATE FEDERAL property taxes. student [Maine DOE Data Warehouse]. This diference MOSTLY FROM MOSTLY MOSTLY is a reflection of local control and highly variable PROPERTY FROM SALES AND FROM INCOME AND Forty percent of total education funding - both EPS resources and capacity from district to district. and additional funds above EPS provided by local TAXES INCOME TAXES PAYROLL TAXES governments - comes from the state (not to be Maine’s 2015 per student elementary and secondary $ 1.426 billion 1.061 billion 184 million confused with the state’s obligation to pay 55% of EPS). spending ranked 16th among the 50 states [Census The state raises this revenue through state income % 53 40 7 School System Finances Survey]. and sales taxes. However, all of the other New England states spend How does this break down by student and how does more per student than Maine [Census]. Maine compare to other states? Per student spending, it should be clarified, includes all operations and debt Adjusted for inflation, per student education spending expenditures, but does not include teacher retirement. in Maine has increased by about 20% on average since 2003-04, as shown below. SOURCES OF PUBLIC ELEMENTARY & SECONDARY EDUCATION FUNDING IN MAINE, FY 2015 PER STUDENT ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION SPENDING: MAINE AVERAGE Federal State 7% $12,110 $12,107 $12,198 $12,939 40% $10,678 $11,150 $11,714 2016 DOLLARS 2003-04 2005-06 2007-08 2009-10 2011-12 2013-14 2015-16 SOURCE: Maine Department of Education Data Warehouse Municipal 53% SOURCE: Public Education Finance: 2015, U.S. Census Bureau 482 CONGRESS ST., STE. 303 125 COMMUNITY DR. #101 PORTLAND, ME 04101 AUGUSTA, ME 04330 207-347-8638 207-623-4568 EDUCATEMAINE.ORG MAINECHAMBER.ORG 4 PRE-K TO 12: WHAT SHARE OF LOCAL AND STATE SPENDING IS DEDICATED TO EDUCATION? The figures in the previous section showed the levels and sources of all funding for Pre-K to 12 public EDUCATION FUNDING AS A PERCENTAGE OF EDUCATION FUNDING AS A PERCENTAGE OF schools in Maine. This page is about efort—how much ALL EXPENDITURES: STATE GENERAL FUND ALL EXPENDITURES: MAINE MUNICIPAL of the state budget, and how much of local budgets, EXPENDITURES, FY 2016 EXPENDITURES, FY 2015 are dedicated to Pre-K to 12 public schools? At the state level, public education expenditures as a Other K-12 Education Code Enforcement whole comprise 45% of the state general fund budget. 15% General Purpose 48% Aid for Local 1% Of this total amount, 9% is for higher education. Debt Service Schools Economic Development This leaves 29% for local schools, 5% for teacher 3% 29% 2% retirement, and 2% for early childhood and other Parks, Rec & Libraries 3% education programs. Personal County Assessment 5% At the local level, Pre-K to 12 education expends about Services 14% Higher education half (48%) of municipal spending in Maine. 9% Administrative Offices 5% Teacher retirement Employee Benefits 5% Medicaid/ 5% Public Works MaineCare Other education Early childhood 15% 24% programs education Municipal & School Debt Public Safety 1% 1% 5% 10% All State Education Expenditures: 45% All Municipal Education Expenditures: 48% SOURCE: State Budget Overview 2016, Maine Legislature Office of Fscal and Program Review SOURCE: 2015 Fiscal Survey Report, Maine Municipal Association 482 CONGRESS ST., STE. 303 125 COMMUNITY DR. #101 PORTLAND, ME 04101 AUGUSTA, ME 04330 207-347-8638 207-623-4568 EDUCATEMAINE.ORG MAINECHAMBER.ORG 5 PRE-K TO 12: HOW DOES THE STATE DECIDE HOW MUCH TO ALLOCATE TO EDUCATION? The state must determine two things when The second step in the process is to create a formula considering education funding.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The State of Maine K-12 Science and Mathematics Preservice Education 2010-2015
    The state of Maine K-12 science and mathematics preservice education 2010-2015 Thomas E. Keller March 2018 For more information: Email [email protected] Or visit www.mmsa.org Abstract Five years of data reported by the US Department of Education Title 2 Higher Education Act on teacher preparation program completers in Maine were analyzed and reviewed along with Maine Department of teacher certification and endorsements. This analysis focused on teachers of science and mathematics such as general elementary teachers, secondary life science teachers, secondary physical science teachers, and secondary mathematics teachers. These are the teachers who teach STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) although there is currently no certification for integrated STEM teaching. Findings included: • Smaller and often private institutions are producing disproportional numbers of teachers of math and science graduating from undergraduate programs. For example, in AY 2014-15, Bowdoin College and the University of New England prepared as many secondary physical science teachers as did the two largest teacher preparation programs in the state, the University of Maine and the University of Maine at Farmington. This was only one teacher each. • In terms of production, between 255 and 409 (aver = 339) elementary teachers are prepared each year; between 8 and 27 (aver = 19) secondary life science teachers are prepared each year; between 5 and 16 (aver = 10) secondary physical science teachers are prepared each year; and, between 15 and 38 (aver = 33) secondary mathematics teachers are prepared each year when the efforts of all undergraduate programs in Maine are considered. • The Maine Department of Education is unable to disaggregate data on teacher recruitment making any statements on supply and demand moot.
    [Show full text]
  • Support K-12 Computer Science Education in Maine
    Support K-12 Computer Science Education in Maine Computer science drives job growth and innovation throughout our economy and society. Computing occupations are the number 1 source of all new wages in the U.S. and make up over half of all projected new jobs in STEM fields, making Computer Science one of the most in- demand college degrees. And computing is used all around us and in virtually every field. It’s foundational knowledge that all students need. But computer science is marginalized throughout education. Only 45% of U.S. high schools teach any computer science courses and only 11% of bachelor's degrees are in Computer Science. We need to improve access for all students, including groups who have traditionally been underrepresented. In Maine, there are currently 1,597 open computing jobs with an average salary of $81,965. Yet, there were only 152 graduates in computer science in 2018 and only 56% of all public high schools teach a foundational course. Computer science in Maine Only 298 exams were taken in AP Computer Science by high school students in Maine in 2020 (119 took AP CS A and 179 took AP CSP). Only 30% were taken by female students (22% for AP CS A and 35% for AP CSP); only 12 exams were taken by Hispanic/Latino/Latina students (5 took AP CS A and 7 took AP CSP); only 3 exams were taken by Black/African American students (2 took AP CS A and 1 took AP CSP); only 1 exam was taken by Native American/Alaskan students (0 took AP CS A and 1 took AP CSP); no exams were taken by Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander students.
    [Show full text]
  • Educator Recruitment and Retention in Maine Schools
    Educator Recruitment and Retention in Maine Schools Amy Johnson, Ph.D. Kathryn Hawes, Ph.D. Sigrid Olson, MSIA Maine Education Policy Research Institute University of Southern Maine October 2020 Center for Education Policy, Applied Research, and Evaluation Published by the Maine Education Policy Research Institute in the Center for Education Policy, Applied Research, and Evaluation (CEPARE) in the School of Education and Human Development, University of Southern Maine. CEPARE provides assistance to school districts, agencies, organizations, and university faculty by conducting research, evaluation, and policy studies. In addition, CEPARE co-directs the Maine Education Policy Research Institute (MEPRI), an institute jointly funded by the Maine State Legislature and the University of Maine System. This institute was established to conduct studies on Maine education policy and the Maine public education system for the Maine Legislature. Statements and opinions by the authors do not necessarily reflect a position or policy of the Maine Education Policy Research Institute, nor any of its members, and no official endorsement by them should be inferred. The University of Southern Maine does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, national origin or citizenship status, age, disability, or veteran's status and shall comply with Section 504, Title IX, and the A.D.A in employment, education, and in all other areas of the University. The University provides reasonable accommodations to qualified individuals
    [Show full text]
  • Made in Maine
    Made in Maine A State Report Card on Public Higher Education American Council of Trustees and Alumni with The Maine Heritage Policy Center Made in Maine A State Report Card on Public Higher Education American Council of Trustees and Alumni with The Maine Heritage Policy Center April 2011 Acknowledgments This report was prepared by the staff of the American Council of Trustees and Alumni, primarily Eric Markley and Dr. Michael Poliakoff, in conjunction with The Maine Heritage Policy Center. ACTA thanks the staff of MHPC for their assistance and the staff of the University of Maine System for their gracious cooperation. The American Council of Trustees and Alumni is an independent non-profit dedicated to academic excellence, academic freedom, and accountability at America’s colleges and universities. Since its founding in 1995, ACTA has counseled boards, educated the public, and published reports about such issues as good governance, historical literacy, core curricula, the free exchange of ideas, and accreditation. ACTA has previously published Here We Have Idaho: A State Report Card on Public Higher Education, At a Crossroads: A Report Card on Public Higher Education in Minnesota, For the People: A Report Card on Public Higher Education in Illinois, Show Me: A Report Card on Public Higher Education in Missouri, Shining the Light: A Report Card on Georgia’s System of Public Higher Education, and Governance in the Public Interest: A Case Study of the University of North Carolina System, among other state-focused reports. The Maine Heritage Policy Center is a non-profit research and educational organization that formulates innovative public policy solutions for Maine concerning the economy and taxation, education, health care, and open government based on the principles of free enterprise and limited government.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report of the Committee to Study the Scope And
    STATE OF MAINE 121ST LEGISLATURE FIRST REGULAR SESSION Final Report of the Commission to Study the Scope and Quality of Citizenship Education February 2004 Members: Senator Neria R. Douglas, Chair Representative Glenn Cummings, Chair Senator Betty Lou Mitchell Representative Gerald M. Davis Joseph Burnham Gale Caddoo Amanda Coffin Staff: Christopher J. Hall Phillip D. McCarthy, Ed.D., Legislative Analyst Judith Harvey Nicole A. Dube, Legislative Analyst Kurt Hoffman Richard Marchi Office of Policy & Legal Analysis Denise O’Toole Maine Legislature Elizabeth McCabe Park (207) 287-1670 Patrick Phillips http://www.state.me.us/legis/opla/ Francine Rudoff Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... i I. Introduction....................................................................................................... 1 II. Background ....................................................................................................... 4 III. Summary of Key Findings ................................................................................ 8 IV. Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................................... 15 Appendices A. Authorizing Legislation, Resolve 2003, Chapter 85 B. Membership List, Commission to Study the Scope and Quality of Citizenship Education C. Resource People and Presenters Providing Information to the Commission D. Definitions E. Bibliography of Citizenship Education Materials F. Citizenship
    [Show full text]
  • Ummary of the Commission on Higher Education
    ummary of the Commission on Higher Education Governance SThe 1996 Commission on Higher Education Governance, one of many commissions, task forces and committees that have been appointed over the years to “look at” issues in higher education, has looked, and what the Commission has found is a remarkable disconnect between the public, the government and the institutions of higher education. In the past such a disconnect may have been attributed to a misunderstanding or misinformation, but this time it’s different. The disconnect seems to have become synonymous with distrust. Parents and students can’t understand why tuition has soared at twice the rate of inflation, elected officials search furiously for greater accountability for the public dollar, and higher education watches in disbelief as it struggles along with flat funding and a shrinking percentage of the State budget. Buildings deteriorate, enrollments remain flat and the most precious commodity of all in higher education, an institution’s reputation, hangs in the balance. What possibly can a new report say or do that could overcome such a perilous outlook? This Commission has offered a series of recommendations that will help in a number of areas. But what must happen cannot be dictated by a report. The real solution is in the re-establishment of the partnership between the citizens of Maine, the Legislature, the Governor and our public and private institutions of higher education, a partnership that will remove the regrettable distrust that has grown between them. This partnership is so important that Maine’s success and future vitality as a State depend on it.
    [Show full text]
  • Condition of K-12 Public Education in Maine 2011
    The Condition of K-12 Public Education in Maine 2011 Prepared for the Maine Education Policy Research Institute by Christine Donis-Keller Research Analyst Courtney Bartlett Research Assistant Sharon Gerrish Administrative Manager David L. Silvernail Director Center for Education Policy, Applied Research, and Evaluation School of Education and Human Development University of Southern Maine Published by the Center for Education Policy, Applied Research, and Evaluation (CEPARE) in the School of Education and Human Development, University of Southern Maine. Statements and opinions by the authors do not necessarily reflect a position or policy of the Maine Education Policy Research Institute, nor any of its members, and no official endorsement by them should be inferred. The University of Southern Maine does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, national origin or citizenship status, age, disability, or veteran's status and shall comply with Section 504, Title IX, and the A.D.A in employment, education, and in all other areas of the University. The University provides reasonable accommodations to qualified individuals with disabilities upon request. First printing, December, 2010. This publication is available in PDF format at the CEPARE website: www.cepare.usm.maine.edu. Additional bound copies of this publication are available for $20.00 each plus $2.00 for shipping and handling. All orders must be either prepaid by check or money order payable to the University of Southern Maine, or accompanied by a purchase order. Orders should be sent to: CEPARE The Conditions Book University of Southern Maine 140 School St. Gorham, ME 04038 FAX: (207) 228-8143 A Center of the 140 School Street, Gorham, Maine 04038 School of Education and (207) 780-5044; FAX (207) 228-8143; TTY (207) 780-5646 Human Development www.cepare.usm.maine.edu A member of the University of Maine System Dear Maine Citizen, We are pleased to present you with the twelfth edition of The Condition of K-12 Public Education in Maine.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revolutionary Model to Improve Science Education, Teachers, And
    IMPROVING SCIENCE EDUCATION, TEACHERS, AND SCIENTISTS A Revolutionary Model to To meet many modern global challenges, we need to promote scientific and technical literacy. The U.S. National Improve Science Science Foundation (NSF) supports a “revolutionary” Education, program to connect science education at all levels, from elementary through graduate school. Susan Brawley and Teachers, and her co-authors demonstrate how Maine has benefitted from Scientists this program. They describe the University of Maine’s NSF-funded “GK-12 STEM” program, which placed by Susan H. Brawley graduate and advanced undergraduate science and tech- Judith Pusey nology students in elementary, middle, and high school Barbara J. W. Cole classrooms; provided equipment for the schools; and offered Lauree E. Gott training and professional development for the partner Stephen A. Norton teachers. The authors urge the state, universities, and school districts to continue to use this model to increase science literacy and research capacity. 68 · MAINE POLICY REVIEW · Summer 2008 View current & previous issues of MPR at: www.umaine.edu/mcsc/mpr.htm IMPROVING SCIENCE EDUCATION, TEACHERS, AND SCIENTISTS Science education cience and technology have a significant role to play 20 new awards will be made in Sin meeting many modern global challenges. To meet 2008 (NSF GK-12 2008, Sonia from elementary these challenges and assure a healthy economy, we need Ortega personal communication, citizens who are scientifically and technically literate. August 8, 2008). The three GK- school through Science education from elementary school through 12 programs funded in Maine graduate studies is not meeting the demand for a scien- are “NSF Graduate Teaching graduate studies tifically literate populace and there have been calls for Fellows in K-12 Education reform at all levels (reviewed by National Research at the University of Maine,” is not meeting Council 1996; Campbell, Fuller and Patrick 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Maine School of Science and Mathematics Situation Analysis and Review of Peer Residential STEM Schools
    Maine School of Science and Mathematics Situation Analysis and Review of Peer Residential STEM Schools Prepared for the Business Planning Committee/Discovery Committee By Hart Consulting MSSM Business Planning Committee/Discovery Committee Members Member Committee Role Kate diLutio Economist, Alumna David Coit Business Planning Committee Chair Jeremy Shute Software Engineer, Alumnus Cristobal Alvarado Doctor, Student Parent William Tun Student David Pearson Executive Director Anthony Scott Faculty Member Patricia Hart, Kate Leveille Consultants to the project Generously Supported by an Anonymous Gift Through the Maine Community Foundation With Great Appreciation Many thanks to the administrators at the peer public residential STEM schools who participated in the in-depth discussions. They made time for these interviews as they were re-opening their schools for students after a six-month shut down forced by the pandemic. Their willingness to share lessons learned, their commitment to their students, and to STEM education is inspirational. Over 150 stakeholders of the MSSM community – Committee Members, Board of Trustees, Faculty, Staff, Students, Parents, and Alumni – participated in presentations of early analyses and provided valuable input that shaped the analysis and conclusions. Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Background .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Education Funding
    Vermont Legislative Research Service https://www.uvm.edu/cas/polisci/vermont-legislative-research-service-vlrs Technical Education Funding in Vermont, Maine, and Massachusetts Vocational and Technical Education schools and programs are designed to teach practical and applied skills that are directly related to employment in current or emerging occupations.1 This type of specialized education is also known as Career and Technical Education and may be referred to as CTE throughout the rest of this paper. CTE participation has been on a steady decline since 1992, with the percent of high school graduates earning CTE credits declining from 95% to 88%.2 The decline in CTE participation has also been notable in Vermont, where there has been a decrease of nearly 6,000 students grades 9-12 who are enrolled in CTE programs since 2010.3 These declines are worth noting, as CTE programs are important tools for growing the economy and providing affordable access to credentials that could lead to high wage jobs for populations who do not always thrive in standard classroom environments.4 CTE programs have also been proven to be successful at moving first generation students and students living in poverty towards post-secondary credentials.5 Because of the known benefits of offering CTE programs, it is important to understand how different states fund and organize their CTE programs, so Vermont can best offer these opportunities to students. In general, there are four ways states distribute funds for CTE programs: student-based formulas, unit-based formulas, cost-based formulas, and funding for CTE centers.6 With student-based formulas, the number of students enrolled in CTE determines the amount of state funding a school district receives.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Analysis of the Report of the Select Panel on Revisioning Education in Maine
    Fiscal Analysis of the Report of the Select Panel on Revisioning Education in Maine Dr. David L. Silvernail Director Ms. Ida A. Batista Research Analyst Center for Education Policy, Applied Research and Evaluation University of Southern Maine August 2006 Fiscal Analysis of the Report of the Select Panel on Revisioning Education in Maine David L. Silvernail Ida A. Batista Director Research Analyst Background In late 2005 the Select Panel on Revisioning Education in Maine issued their draft report describing a series of recommendations for the improvement of student learning in Maine. The Panel, convened by the Maine State Board of Education, and pursuant to Tile 20-A statutory requirements, developed their recommendations through six months of data collection and analysis, discussions and deliberations, culminating in a draft report for further discussions and debate by the Maine citizenry. In summer 2006 the Select Panel requested the Center for Education Policy, Applied Research and Evaluation (CEPARE) at the University of Southern Maine conduct a cost analysis of the Panel’s recommendations. This report describes the findings from the cost analysis. Methodology The authors of the report met several times with members of the Select Panel to establish the processes and assumptions to be used in the cost analysis. More specifically, we met with the Panel to determine: (1) the various assumptions the Panel held in formulating their recommendations; and (2), any modifications the Panel was making in their original recommendations, based on public input and further deliberations by the Select Panel. Information from these discussions with the Panel was then used by the authors of this report for establishing five year projected costs for implementing the Select Panel’s revised recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Maine Computer Science Task Force Report
    Maine Computer Science Task Force Report (LD 398) Published on January 17, 2018 That the Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Council, referred to in this resolve as "the council," shall establish and convene a computer science education task force, referred to in this resolve as "the task force," to develop an informed strategy to integrate computer science into the State's proficiency-based high school diploma requirements, as well as to expose all students to computer science as a basic skill and as a potential career path. Task Force Members: Renee Charette, Mathematics Specialist, Maine Mathematics and Science Alliance Valerie Green, Department Chair, Computer and Information Sciences, Southern Maine Community College Dr. Jason Judd, Chair, Program Director of Project>Login, Educate Maine Dr. Tom Keller, Senior Research Scientist, Maine Mathematics and Science Alliance Dr. Carol Kim, Associate Vice Chancellor for Academic Innovation and Partnerships, University of Maine System Shawn Lambert, Technical School Director, Oxford Hills Technical School Dr. Regina Lewis, Mathematics Teacher, Oak Hill High School Dani McAvoy, Education Program Manager, Code.org Dr. Harlan Onsrud, Professor/Director, School of Computing and Information Science, University of Maine Pamela Rawson, Mathematics Teacher, Baxter Academy for Technology and Science Marina Van der Eb, Maine STEM Partnership Coordinator, Maine Center for Research in STEM Education, University of Maine Sean Wasson, Technology Teacher, Lyman Moore Middle School 1 Table of Contents Maine Computer Science Task Force Report 1 Executive Summary 3 What is computer science? 4 National Computer Science Education Movement 4 Maine Is Falling Behind 6 Recommendations For Expanding Computer Science Education In Maine 7 Accomplishing Recommendations 10 Adopt rigorous Computer Science Standards as part of the existing science standards areas.
    [Show full text]