DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Report (PWD RP V3400-1690)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Report (PWD RP V3400-1690) Seagrass Response to Wastewater Inputs: Implementation of a Seagrass Monitoring Program in Two Texas Estuaries Cindy Contreras, Adam Whisenant, Jennifer M. Bronson, and Patricia L. Radloff Water Resources Branch Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 4200 Smith School Road Austin, Texas 78744 April 2011 Water Quality Technical Series WQTS-2011-02 Final Report Seagrass Response to Wastewater Inputs: Implementation of a Seagrass Monitoring Program in Two Texas Estuaries March 24, 2011 Cindy Contreras, Adam Whisenant, Jennifer M. Bronson, and Patricia L. Radloff Water Resources Branch Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 4200 Smith School Road Austin, Texas 78744-3291 GLO contract number: 10-049-000-3745 TPWD contract number: 211946 This work is funded in part by a grant/cooperative agreement from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and no not necessarily reflect the views of NOAA or any of its sub-agencies. Table of Contents Tables .............................................................................................................................................. 6 Appendix C ................................................................................................................................. 6 Appendix D ................................................................................................................................. 7 Appendix E ................................................................................................................................. 7 Appendix F.................................................................................................................................. 8 Figures............................................................................................................................................. 9 Appendix C ............................................................................................................................... 10 Appendix E ............................................................................................................................... 10 Appendix F................................................................................................................................ 11 Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................... 13 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... 15 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 17 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 20 Study Area .................................................................................................................................... 21 Methods......................................................................................................................................... 26 Seagrass Basics ......................................................................................................................... 26 Aerial Imagery .......................................................................................................................... 26 Acquisition ............................................................................................................................ 26 Analysis................................................................................................................................. 27 Field Data Collection ................................................................................................................ 27 General Overview ................................................................................................................. 27 Instantaneous Physicochemical Measurements .................................................................... 30 Long-term Water Quality Measurements ............................................................................. 30 Water Chemistry ................................................................................................................... 30 Sediment Chemistry .............................................................................................................. 30 Quality Control for Water and Sediment Samples ............................................................... 31 Methods Comparison for Water and Sediment Samples ...................................................... 31 Macroalgae Collection .......................................................................................................... 31 Percent Vegetative Cover ..................................................................................................... 32 Seagrass Cores ...................................................................................................................... 33 Seagrass Shoot Collection..................................................................................................... 34 Processing and Analysis of Biological Samples ....................................................................... 36 Macroalgae ............................................................................................................................ 36 Seagrass Cores ...................................................................................................................... 36 Seagrass Shoots for Epiphyte Load ...................................................................................... 37 Data Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 37 Results ........................................................................................................................................... 37 Aerial Imagery .......................................................................................................................... 37 East Flats 2009 ...................................................................................................................... 37 Port Bay 2009 ....................................................................................................................... 41 East Flats 2010 ...................................................................................................................... 45 Port Bay 2010 ....................................................................................................................... 47 Site Characterization ................................................................................................................. 50 Instantaneous Physicochemical Measurements .................................................................... 50 3 Measures of Water Clarity .................................................................................................... 50 Long-Term Physicochemical Measurements ........................................................................ 52 Water Chemistry ................................................................................................................... 55 Sediment Characteristics ....................................................................................................... 55 Inter-laboratory Comparisons ................................................................................................... 58 Biological Parameters ............................................................................................................... 59 Seagrass Percent Coverage ................................................................................................... 59 Macroalgae Biomass ............................................................................................................. 62 Seagrass Shoot Density and Biomass ................................................................................... 62 Seagrass Leaf Area Index ..................................................................................................... 69 Epiphyte Loading .................................................................................................................. 69 Seagrass Stable Isotope ......................................................................................................... 82 Videography .......................................................................................................................... 85 Discussion ..................................................................................................................................... 86 Wastewater Impact .................................................................................................................... 87 Statewide Seagrass Monitoring ................................................................................................. 89 Aerial Imagery .......................................................................................................................... 92 Method .................................................................................................................................. 92 Comparison of 2009 and 2010 Imagery Analysis................................................................. 93 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bioone? RESEARCH
    RESEARCH BioOne? EVOLVED Proximate Nutrient Analyses of Four Species of Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Consumed by Florida Manatee (Trichechus manatus latirostris) Compared to Romaine Lettuce (Lactuca sativa var. longifolia) Author(s): Jessica L. Siegal-Willott, D.V.M., Dipl. A.C.Z.M., Kendal Harr, D.V.M., M.S., Dipl. A.C.V.P., Lee-Ann C. Hayek, Ph.D., Karen C. Scott, Ph.D., Trevor Gerlach, B.S., Paul Sirois, M.S., Mike Renter, B.S., David W. Crewz, M.S., and Richard C. Hill, M.A., Vet.M.B., Ph.D., M.R.C.V.S. Source: Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine, 41(4):594-602. 2010. Published By: American Association of Zoo Veterinarians DOI: 10.1638/2009-0118.1 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1638/2009-0118.1 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is an electronic aggregator of bioscience research content, and the online home to over 160 journals and books published by not-for-profit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne's Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms of use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research.
    [Show full text]
  • Buccoo Reef/ Bon Accord Lagoon Complex
    BUCCOO REEF/ BON ACCORD LAGOON COMPLEX Geographical Location: Tobago Name of the Ramsar site: Buccoo Reef/Bon Accord Lagoon Complex Ramsar Site No.: 1496 Geographical coordinates (latitude/longitude): 11° 10′ N, 60° 57′ W, Total site area: 1287 hectares 2 Area: 12.87 km (1287 ha). Mean sea level to 30 m below sea level Mangroves 2 2 2 account for 1.3 km (130 ha) of which 0.1 km (10 ha) are ponds and 0.5 km (50 ha) are seagrass beds General location: The wetland is located on the leeward coast of south-western Tobago and approximately 6 miles (in a straight line) from the administrative town of Scarborough, which is in the parish of St. Andrew. Adjacent to the wetland are the villages of Buccoo and Canaan/Bon Accord which are considered population growth poles in Tobago (IMA, 1996). Summary description: Buccoo Reef / Bon Accord Lagoon Complex. 1,287 ha; 11°10'N 060°57'W. Restricted Area (in the process of being designated as Environmentally Sensitive Area). Located on the south-western coast of Tobago near Scarborough, this site contains several under-represented wetland types such as coral reefs, seagrass beds and mangrove forests. Endangered and vulnerable species in the area include various types of coral (Acropora palmata, Diploria labyrinthiformis, D. strigosa and Siderastrea siderea) as well as the critically endangered Hawksbill turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) and at least 119 fish species. As the major tourist attraction in Tobago, the reef continues to be adversely affected by intense tourist activity and pollutant discharges. So far the restricted area status and existing management plan have been unable to prevent these impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Seagrass Distribution and Diversity: a Bioregional Model ⁎ F
    Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350 (2007) 3–20 www.elsevier.com/locate/jembe Global seagrass distribution and diversity: A bioregional model ⁎ F. Short a, , T. Carruthers b, W. Dennison b, M. Waycott c a Department of Natural Resources, University of New Hampshire, Jackson Estuarine Laboratory, Durham, NH 03824, USA b Integration and Application Network, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Cambridge, MD 21613, USA c School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, 4811 Queensland, Australia Received 1 February 2007; received in revised form 31 May 2007; accepted 4 June 2007 Abstract Seagrasses, marine flowering plants, are widely distributed along temperate and tropical coastlines of the world. Seagrasses have key ecological roles in coastal ecosystems and can form extensive meadows supporting high biodiversity. The global species diversity of seagrasses is low (b60 species), but species can have ranges that extend for thousands of kilometers of coastline. Seagrass bioregions are defined here, based on species assemblages, species distributional ranges, and tropical and temperate influences. Six global bioregions are presented: four temperate and two tropical. The temperate bioregions include the Temperate North Atlantic, the Temperate North Pacific, the Mediterranean, and the Temperate Southern Oceans. The Temperate North Atlantic has low seagrass diversity, the major species being Zostera marina, typically occurring in estuaries and lagoons. The Temperate North Pacific has high seagrass diversity with Zostera spp. in estuaries and lagoons as well as Phyllospadix spp. in the surf zone. The Mediterranean region has clear water with vast meadows of moderate diversity of both temperate and tropical seagrasses, dominated by deep-growing Posidonia oceanica.
    [Show full text]
  • Karyotype Variations in Seagrass (Halodule Wrightii Ascherson￢ﾀﾔ
    Aquatic Botany 136 (2017) 52–55 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Aquatic Botany journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/aquabot Short communication Karyotype variations in seagrass (Halodule wrightii Ascherson—Cymodoceaceae) a b,∗ a Silmar Luiz da Silva , Karine Matos Magalhães , Reginaldo de Carvalho a Graduate Program in Botany—PPGB and Cytogenetic Plant Laboratory of the Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Rua Dom Manoel de Medeiros, s/n, Dois Irmãos, CEP: 52171-900, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil b Aquatic Ecosystems Laboratory of the Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Rua Dom Manoel de Medeiros, s/n, Dois Irmãos, CEP: 52171-900, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Karyotype variations in plants are common, but the results of cytological studies of some seagrasses Received 26 June 2015 remain unclear. The nature of the variation is not clearly understood, and the basic chromosomal num- Received in revised form 5 August 2016 ber has still not been established for the majority of the species. Here, we describe karyotype variations in Accepted 15 September 2016 the seagrass Halodule wrightii, and we suggest potentially causative mechanisms involving cytomixis and Available online 16 September 2016 B chromosomes. We prepared slides using the squashing technique followed by conventional Giemsa and C-banding, and silver nitrate and a CMA/DAPI staining. Based on intraspecific analysis, the diploid chromo- Keywords: some number of H. wrightii exhibited a variation from 2n = 24 to 2n = 39; 2n = 38 was the most frequent. In Cytomixis Seagrass general, we characterized the karyotype as an asymmetrical, semi-reticulated interphase nucleus with a chromosomally uniform condensation pattern.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sea-Grasses of Brazil Ligulate, Linear, Leaf-Tip
    Acta Bot. Need. October 512-516 21(5), 1972, p. The sea-grasses of Brazil C. den Hartog Rijksherbarium, Leiden There is still hardly anything known aboutthe occurrence of sea-grasses in South America. The number of records is extremely small. Therefore, one wonders whether these plants are extremely rare or absent along long stretches of coast, whether it is that have been overlooked or just they by botanists. It seems that the latterapplies to the coast of Brazil, from where up to nowonly two collections had been recorded (Setchell 1934; den Hartog 1970). Thanks to the active, gratefully acknowledged co-operation of Dr. Liliane Forneris (Universidade de Sao Paulo) I received a number of sea-grasses from several places along the Brazilian coast. I am also indebted to Dr. Emilia Santos (Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro) and Dr. Graziela M. Barroso (Jardim Botanico, Rio de Janeiro) for and sending me a specimen a photograph, respectively, of Halophila decipiens. Further, I am grateful to Dr. V. J. H. de Jilovice de Sternberg (Com- panhia ‘Algimar’, Rio de Janeiro) for his co-operation in obtaining material. At present there are 5 species now known from Brazil. KEY TO THE SEA-GRASSES OF BRAZIL 1. Leaves with 3 Tannin cells ligulate, linear, nerves. present. 2. Leaf-tip bicuspidate; leaves Va-l mm wide 1. Halodule wrightii obtuse with 2. Leaf-tip or emarginate, very faintly developed lateral teeth, or without such teeth; leaves wider than 1 mm. 3. Leaf-tip emarginate 2. Halodule emarginata 3. Leaf-tip obtuse 3. Halodule lilianeae 1.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Cuban Seagrasses
    Bull Mar Sci. 94(2):269–282. 2018 research paper https://doi.org/10.5343/bms.2017.1014 An overview of Cuban seagrasses Centro de Investigaciones Beatriz Martínez-Daranas * Marinas, Universidad de La Habana, Calle 16 No. 114, Ana M Suárez Miramar, Playa, Havana, 11300, Cuba. * Corresponding author email: <[email protected]>. ABSTRACT.—Here, we present an overview of the current knowledge of Cuban seagrasses, including distribution, status, threats, and efforts for their conservation. It has been estimated that seagrasses cover about 50% of the Cuban shelf, with six species reported and Thalassia testudinum K.D. Koenig being the most dominant. Seagrasses have been studied primarily in three areas in Cuba (northwest, north-central, and southwest). Thalassia testudinum and other seagrasses exhibit spatial and temporal variations in abundance, and updating of their status and distribution is needed. The main threat to Cuban seagrass ecosystems is low seawater transparency due to causes such as eutrophication and erosion. High salinities limit their distribution in the Sabana-Camagüey Archipelago, partly the result of freshwater dams and roads. Seagrass meadows play important ecological k roles and provide many ecosystem services in Cuba, with efforts underway to preserve this ecosystem. Research and Marine Ecology and Conservation in Cuba management projects are directed toward integrated coastal zone management, including a ban on trawl fisheries and the Guest Editors: extension of marine protected areas to contain more seagrass Joe Roman, Patricia González-Díaz meadows. In addition to updating species distributions, it is Date Submitted: 17 February, 2017. urgent that managers and researchers in Cuba examine the Date Accepted: 22 November, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Flowering and Seed Production in the Subtropical Seagrass, Halodule Wrightii (Shoal Grass)
    University of Texas Rio Grande Valley ScholarWorks @ UTRGV Biology Faculty Publications and Presentations College of Sciences 5-2016 Flowering and seed production in the subtropical seagrass, Halodule wrightii (shoal grass) Joseph L. Kowalski The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Hudson R. DeYoe The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.utrgv.edu/bio_fac Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Kowalski, Joseph L. and DeYoe, Hudson R.. "Flowering and seed production in the subtropical seagrass, Halodule wrightii (shoal grass)" Botanica Marina, vol. 59, no. 2-3, 2016, pp. 193-199. https://doi.org/ 10.1515/bot-2015-0099 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Sciences at ScholarWorks @ UTRGV. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UTRGV. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. DE GRUYTER Botanica Marina 2016; 59(2-3): 193–199 Short communication Joseph L. Kowalski* and Hudson R. DeYoe Flowering and seed production in the subtropical seagrass, Halodule wrightii (shoal grass) DOI 10.1515/bot-2015-0099 and Kowalski 2014). Halodule wrightii Ascherson (shoal Received 26 November, 2015; accepted 14 April, 2016; online first 25 grass) did not experience overall decline and remains an May, 2016 abundant and ecologically important seagrass that often grows in disturbed sediments (Pulich 1982). Reproduc- Abstract: Reproductive structures of the seagrass, tive structures of H. wrightii have been found from Brazil, Halodule wrightii Ascherson (shoal grass) are cryptic several localities along the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean and ephemeral, but were found on several occasions at Sea and the east coast of North America (Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Halodule in Bermuda
    THE SEAGRASS HALODULE IN BERMUDA J.M. Bilewitch1, K.A. Coates1, S.A. Manuel1, J.W. Fourqurean2, W.J. Kenworthy3 1DEPT OF CONSERVATION SERVICES, BDA; 2FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIV, MIAMI, USA; 3NOAA, BEAUFORT, NC USA Introduction Results Comprehensive benthic surveys done between 2006 and 2009 show that Halodule in The seagrass Halodule bermudensis den Hartog 1964 was described as an endemic Bermuda is a widespread, shallow-water organism found both inshore and at offshore Bermudian species. (See type location in Fig. 4) reef-associated sites (Figs 4 & 5). When sediment conditions and light levels are adequate for supporting seagrass beds, the density of Halodule in the beds is probably controlled by nutrient availability. Species Halodule sp Common name shoal grass Maximum 12.5 m depth Light 25-65% requirement (median 50%) Prevalence common (11.1%) flowers in May- Reproduction July; female only Fig. 1. Leaf tips (above) and original specimen (right) Fig. 4. Present distribution of Halodule in of H. bermudensis. Scale for tips = 1 mm. Bermuda; sample locations for genetic and leaf tip material ↓; and type location for H. Fig. 5. Ecology of Halodule in Bermuda. However, specimens of Halodule collected in Bermuda are more frequently referred to bermudensis Halodule wrightii Ascherson. The taxonomic question of “what is H. wrightii?” is complicated by such things as the presence of two very distinct forms of Halodule on the herbarium All leaf tips examined had a distinct mid-projection and two small lateral teeth; blade width sheets of the type material. Den Hartog (1964), among others, recognized that the original about 1 to 1.4 mm (Figs 6 & 7).
    [Show full text]
  • STRESSOR RESPONSE MODEL for the SEAGRASSES, Halodule Wrightii and Thalassia Testudinum
    Final Report for Technical Assistance for an Ecological Evaluation of the Southwest Florida Feasibility Study STRESSOR RESPONSE MODEL FOR THE SEAGRASSES, Halodule wrightii and Thalassia testudinum By Frank J. Mazzotti, Leonard G. Pearlstine, Robert Chamberlain, Tomma Barnes, Kevin Chartier, and Donald DeAngelis Joint Ecosystem Modeling Laboratory Technical Report FINAL REPORT for Technical Assistance for an Ecological Evaluation of the Southwest Florida Feasibility Study STRESSOR RESPONSE MODELS FOR THE SEAGRASSES, Halodule wrightii and Thalassia testudinum Prepared By: Frank J. Mazzotti1, Leonard G. Pearlstine1, Robert Chamberlain 2, Tomma Barnes3, Kevin Chartier1, and Donald DeAngelis4 1University of Florida Ft. Lauderdale Research and Education Center 3205 College Ave Davie, FL 33314 (954) 577-6304 2South Florida Water Management District 3301 Gun Club Road West Palm Beach, FL 33406 3Post, Buckley, Schuh and Jernigan 3501 North Causeway Blvd., Suite 725 Metairie, LA 70001 (504) 862-1481 4United States Geological Survey University of Miami, Dept. of Biology 1301 Memorial Dr. RM 215 Coral Gables, FL 33146 Prepared For: South Florida Water Management District Fort Myers Service Center 2301 McGregor Blvd. Fort Myers, FL 33901 United States Geological Survey 1301 Memorial Dr. RM 215 Coral Gables, FL 33146 (305) 284-3974 May 2007 ii University of Florida This report should be cited as: Mazzotti, F.J., Pearlstine, L.G., Chamberlain, R., Barnes, T., Chartier, K., and DeAngelis, D. 2007, Stressor response models for Seagrasses, Halodule wrightii and Thalassia testudnium. JEM Technical Report. Final report to the South Florida Water Management District and the U.S..Geological Survey. University of Florida, Florida Lauderdale Research and Education Center, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 19 pages.
    [Show full text]
  • Seagrass Taxonomytaxonomy
    SeagrassSeagrass TaxonomyTaxonomy By Dr. Roy L. Lehman Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi TheThe InternationalInternational CodeCode ofof BotanicalBotanical NomenclatureNomenclature Rules for the use of scientific names are maintained and updated periodically at meetings of botanists called International Botanical Congress. Updated rules are published after congress in each new edition of The International Code of Botanical Nomenclature. Now can be found online as a web site. © Dr. Roy L. Lehman BackgroundBackground InformationInformation AuthorAuthor NamesNames Scientific names are often written with their author or authors, the individuals who are responsible for having given the plants their names • Lotus corniculatus L. • Lotus heermanii (Dur. & Hilg.) Greene z Both cases the generic name is Lotus, a genus in the pea family. z First specific epithet is an adjective that in Latin means “bearing a horn-like projection”. z The second was named in honor of A L. Heermann, a 19th century plant collector. z The name means Heermann’s lotus © Dr. Roy L. Lehman AuthorAuthor NamesNames The name or names of the authors follow the binomials z SurnamesSurnames areare oftenoften abbreviatedabbreviated •• asas L.L. forfor LinnaeusLinnaeus © Dr. Roy L. Lehman SecondSecond ExampleExample The second example is a little more complicated. Originally named by two naturalists: z E. M. Durand and z T. C. Hilgard z as Hosackia heermannii. Several years later, E. L. Greene concluded that the genus Hosackia should be merged with Lotus and transferred the specific epithet, heermannii from Hosackia to Lotus. © Dr. Roy L. Lehman SecondSecond ExampleExample Durand and Higard (the parenthetical authors) get credit for having published the epithet, heermannii.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Phylogenetic Regionalization of Marine Plants Reveals Close Evolutionary Affinities Among Disjunct Temperate Assemblages Barna
    Phylogenetic regionalization of marine plants reveals close evolutionary affinities among disjunct temperate assemblages Barnabas H. Darua,b,*, Ben G. Holtc, Jean-Philippe Lessardd,e, Kowiyou Yessoufouf and T. Jonathan Daviesg,h aDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Harvard University Herbaria, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA bDepartment of Plant Science, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield 0028, Pretoria, South Africa cDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot SL5 7PY, United Kingdom dQuebec Centre for Biodiversity Science, Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada eDepartment of Biology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, H4B 1R6, Canada; fDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of South Africa, Florida campus, Florida 1710, South Africa gDepartment of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada hAfrican Centre for DNA Barcoding, University of Johannesburg, PO Box 524, Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa *Corresponding author Email: [email protected] (B.H. Daru) Running head: Phylogenetic regionalization of seagrasses 1 Abstract While our knowledge of species distributions and diversity in the terrestrial biosphere has increased sharply over the last decades, we lack equivalent knowledge of the marine world. Here, we use the phylogenetic tree of seagrasses along with their global distributions and a metric of phylogenetic beta diversity to generate a phylogenetically-based delimitation of marine phytoregions (phyloregions). We then evaluate their evolutionary affinities and explore environmental correlates of phylogenetic turnover between them. We identified 11 phyloregions based on the clustering of phylogenetic beta diversity values. Most phyloregions can be classified as either temperate or tropical, and even geographically disjunct temperate regions can harbor closely related species assemblages.
    [Show full text]
  • Seagrasses of Florida: a Review
    Page 1 of 1 Seagrasses of Florida: A Review Virginia Rigdon The University of Florida Soil and Water Science Departments Introduction Seagrass communities are noted to be some of the most productive ecosystems on earth, as they provide countless ecological functions, including carbon uptake, habitat for endangered species, food sources for many commercially and recreationally important fish and shellfish, aiding nutrient cyling, and their ability to anchor the sediment bottom. These communites are in jeopardy and a wordwide decline can be attributed mainly to deterioration in water quality, due to anthropogenic activities. Seagrasses are a diverse group of submerged angiosperms, which grow in estuaries and shallow ocean shelves and form dense vegetative communities. These vascular plants are not true grasses; however, their “grass-like” qualities and their ability to adapt to a saline environment give them their name. While seagrasses can be found across the globe, they have relatively low taxonomic diversity. There are approximately 60 species of seagrasses, compared to roughly 250,000 terrestrial angiosperms (Orth, 2006). These plants can be traced back to three distinct seagrass families (Hydrocharitaceae, Cymodoceaceace complex, and Zosteraceae), which all evolved 70 million to 100 million years ago from a individual line of monocotyledonous flowering plants (Orth, 2006). The importance of these ecosystems, both ecologically and economically is well understood. The focus of this paper will be to discuss the species of seagrass in Florida, the components which affect their health and growth, and the major factors which threaten these precious and unique ecosystems, as well as programs which are in place to protect and preserve this essential resource.
    [Show full text]