DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter One Watershed Analysis Objectives 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter One Watershed Analysis Objectives 1 Chapter One Watershed Analysis Objectives 1 CHAPTER ONE WATERSHED ANALYSIS OBJECTIVES -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Watershed analysis is essentially ecosystem analysis at the watershed scale. Federal agencies are directed to use an ecosystem management approach to manage public lands. The Record of Decision (ROD) for Amendments to Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management Planning Documents Within the Range of the Northern Spotted Owl, the Northwest Forest Plan (NFP (1994)), recommends that watershed analysis be conducted within watersheds where management activities are being proposed, in order to understand the consequences of management actions prior to implementation. This is the primary reason for conducting the Copeland-Calf Watershed Analysis. The objectives of the Copeland-Calf Watershed Analysis are to: Develop a scientifically based understanding of the dominant physical, biological, and human processes and features and their interactions within the watershed. Use this understanding to sustain the productivity of natural resources in order to meet human needs and desires. Use this understanding to develop the basis to estimate direct, indirect, and cumulative effects of our management activities. Relate these features and processes to those occurring in the river basin or province. Guide the general type, location, and timing of management activities within the watershed. Identify restoration and rehabilitation opportunities within the watershed. Establish a watershed context for evaluating project consistency with the NFP Standards and Guidelines (S & G) for management areas and land allocations. Establish a watershed context for evaluating project consistency with the Aquatic Conservation Strategy (ACS) objectives. Establish a consistent, watershed-wide context for implementing the Endangered Species Act (ESA), including conferencing and consultation under Section 7. Copeland-Calf Watershed Analysis 2 Chapter One Watershed Analysis Objectives Establish a consistent, watershed-wide context for the protection of beneficial uses identified by the states and tribes in their water quality standards under the Federal Clean Water Act. Watershed analysis is not a detailed study of everything in the watershed; instead, it is built upon the most important issues that are discussed in Chapter Five of this document. Watershed analysis is not a decision making process. It is not intended to take the place of detailed, site- specific project planning and analysis under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). This watershed analysis report is a dynamic document. Additions or changes to this document may occur as new information becomes available. This is the first iteration of the Copeland-Calf Watershed Analysis. Copeland-Calf Watershed Analysis Chapter Two Characterization 3 CHAPTER TWO CHARACTERIZATION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTRODUCTION The purpose of this chapter is to: Identify the dominant physical, biological, and human processes and features of the watershed that affect ecosystem function or condition. Relate these features and processes to those occurring in the river basin or province. Provide the watershed context for identifying elements that need to be addressed in the analysis. Identify, map, and describe the most important land allocations, plan objectives, and regulatory constraints that influence resource management in the watershed. GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The Copeland-Calf Watershed is located between Glide and Toketee, approximately 50 miles east of Roseburg, Oregon on the Diamond Lake and North Umpqua Ranger Districts of the Umpqua National Forest (UNF (Figure 1)). The study area of 49,019 acres is located in all, or portions of the following: T26S, R1, 2, and 3E, T27S, R1, 2, and 3E, Willamette Meridian, Douglas County, Oregon. This includes the area from near Illahee Rock, south along Rattlesnake and Rhododendron Ridges to Mud Lake Mountain; westerly along Forest Road 2715 to Snowbird Shelter; northward following Calf and Bradley Ridges; then east on Forest Road 4760 to the point of beginning. Prominent features located within the Copeland-Calf Watershed Analysis area are portions of the North Umpqua River and Boulder Creek Wilderness, as well as State Highway 138, Eagle Rock Campground, Twin Lakes, Eagle and Rattlesnake Rocks, and several holdings of private land. Major stream drainages located within the watershed are Copeland, Calf, Dry, and Deception Creeks, as well as a portion of the North Umpqua River. All creeks are tributaries to the North Umpqua River. Copeland-Calf Watershed Analysis 4 Chapter Two Characterization Relative Location of Copeland-Calf Watershed Analysis Area Figure 1. Relative location of Copeland-Calf Watershed Analysis area. LANDSCAPE OWNERSHIP AND ALLOCATION The Copeland-Calf Watershed is primarily public land administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Forest Service. There are several holdings of private land, totaling approximately 576 acres (Figure 2). The NFP allocates the area to approximately 40,467 acres of Key Watershed, 45,514 acres of Late-Successional Reserve (LSR) and 2,970 acres of Congressionally Reserved land (Wild and Scenic corridor and Wilderness), as shown in Figure 2. Portions of these land allocations may overlap each other within the watershed. Copeland-Calf Watershed Analysis Chapter Two Characterization 5 Land Allocation and Key Watershed in the Copeland-Calf Watershed Figure 2. Land allocation and Key Watershed within the Copeland-Calf Analysis area. Copeland-Calf Watershed Analysis 6 Chapter Two Characterization CORE TOPICS GEOLOGY AND GEOMORPHOLOGY Geologic Setting The Cascades volcanic arc (chain) that extends from northern California into southern British Columbia is thought to have originated about 40 million years ago (Ma) as a consequence of subduction of the Pacific oceanic plate beneath the leading edge of the westward moving North American continental plate. Partial melting of iron and magnesium-rich sea floor crust takes place at depths of 100 or more kilometers, within the Cascadia Subduction Zone. Magma generated deep beneath the continental margin ascends through the Earth’s crust and periodically erupts onto the surface in the form of extrusive lava flows and explosively expelled fragmental (pyroclastic) deposits (McBirney 1978; Duncan and LaVerne 1989, Priest 1990). Within Oregon, the Cascade Range is delineated into two physiographic sub-provinces, the older and deeply eroded Western Cascades and the present day (volcanically active) High Cascades that forms its topographic crest (Peck, et al. 1964). Lithology The Copeland-Calf Watershed Analysis area lies within the deeply incised western flank of the Cascade Range and is mainly underlain by a diverse and crudely layered succession of variably altered volcaniclastic deposits, lava flows, and related intrusive rocks that are collectively assigned to the Tertiary age “Little Butte Group” (Peck, et al 1964). The Little Butte Group was deposited between 35 and 17 Ma, during the period of Western Cascade volcanism (Peck, et al 1964, Sherrod and Smith 1989, Walker and MacLeod 1991). Lava flows and intrusive rocks within the Copeland-Calf Watershed Analysis area consist of resistant, moderately fractured basalt, basaltic andesite, and dacite. Volcaniclastic deposits are comprised of a diversity of relatively soft, poorly bedded tuffs and volcanic breccias that originated from explosive volcanism, or from large-volume mudflows (lahars) and massive debris avalanches. Fluvial reworking of primary, unconsolidated, volcaniclastic deposits formed a variety of weakly resistant, well-bedded sedimentary strata comprising tuffaceous siltstone, sandstone, and conglomerate (Sherrod and Smith 1989, Walker and MacLeod 1991). A local sequence of resistant, Quaternary age, intracanyon lava flows termed the “basalt of Toketee” crops out as a series of remnant benches and tablelands along the North Umpqua River. The basalt of Toketee is dated at roughly 760,000 to 780,000 years of age, thus it is associated with the recent episode of High Cascade volcanism (Sherrod 1986 and 1991). Unconsolidated (surficial) deposits found throughout the Copeland-Calf Watershed Analysis area include chaotic mixtures of fragmented rock and soil debris from massive landslides and stream alluvium (sand, gravel, cobble, and boulders) in floodplains and terraces. Copeland-Calf Watershed Analysis Chapter Two Characterization 7 Peck, et al. (1964), report that the succession of Little Butte Group strata along the North Umpqua River corridor approaches nearly 15,000 feet in thickness. Structurally, the volcanic and sedimentary strata in this region display a prevailing shallow inclination (dip direction) towards the east and are locally cut by a series of faults and related shear zones that follow northeast and northwest trends (Peck, et al. 1964, Sherrod and Smith 1989, Walker and MacLeod 1991). Volcanic, sedimentary, and intrusive rocks forming the Cascade Range are juxtaposed in highly complex geometric relationships. Individual deposits tend to be lens-like in form and are generally laterally and vertically discontinuous over relatively short distances. Complexity arises from a variety of controlling factors that include: a multitude of eruptive sites, various modes of deposition or emplacement, and the relative degree of landscape dissection (erosion)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lakes Basin Bibliography
    Lakes Basin Bibliography OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES Lakes Basin Bibliography Bonnie E. Avery 4/2/2010 The Lakes Basin Bibliography consists of over 600 references relating to the natural resources of Oregon‘s Lakes Basin. Forty percent of the items listed are available to anyone online though not all links are persistent. The remaining sixty percent are held in at least one library either in print or via subscriptions to e-journal content. This set is organized in groups related issues associated with digitization and contribution to an institutional repository such as the ScholarsArchive@OSU which provide for persistent URLs. Also identified are ―key‖ documents as identified by Lakes Basin Explorer project partners and topical websites. i Lakes Basin Bibliography Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 I-a: Resources available online: Documents .............................................................................. 2 I-b: Resources available online: Streaming Video .................................................................... 30 II-a. Candidates for digitization: Print-only OSU Theses and Dissertations ............................. 33 II-b. Candidates for digitization: Government and other reports ............................................... 39 II-c: Candidates for digitization: Local archive collections ........................................................ 53 II-d. Candidates for digitization: Maps
    [Show full text]
  • A Bill to Designate Certain National Forest System Lands in the State of Oregon for Inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System and for Other Purposes
    97 H.R.7340 Title: A bill to designate certain National Forest System lands in the State of Oregon for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System and for other purposes. Sponsor: Rep Weaver, James H. [OR-4] (introduced 12/1/1982) Cosponsors (2) Latest Major Action: 12/15/1982 Failed of passage/not agreed to in House. Status: Failed to Receive 2/3's Vote to Suspend and Pass by Yea-Nay Vote: 247 - 141 (Record Vote No: 454). SUMMARY AS OF: 12/9/1982--Reported to House amended, Part I. (There is 1 other summary) (Reported to House from the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs with amendment, H.Rept. 97-951 (Part I)) Oregon Wilderness Act of 1982 - Designates as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System the following lands in the State of Oregon: (1) the Columbia Gorge Wilderness in the Mount Hood National Forest; (2) the Salmon-Huckleberry Wilderness in the Mount Hood National Forest; (3) the Badger Creek Wilderness in the Mount Hood National Forest; (4) the Hidden Wilderness in the Mount Hood and Willamette National Forests; (5) the Middle Santiam Wilderness in the Willamette National Forest; (6) the Rock Creek Wilderness in the Siuslaw National Forest; (7) the Cummins Creek Wilderness in the Siuslaw National Forest; (8) the Boulder Creek Wilderness in the Umpqua National Forest; (9) the Rogue-Umpqua Divide Wilderness in the Umpqua and Rogue River National Forests; (10) the Grassy Knob Wilderness in and adjacent to the Siskiyou National Forest; (11) the Red Buttes Wilderness in and adjacent to the Siskiyou
    [Show full text]
  • Bretz Club Field Guide - Sunset Bay Area 2012 P.183-198
    Bretz Club Field Guide - Sunset Bay Area 2012 p.183-198 Wallick et al., 2011, Umpqua River Channel Change & Transport p. 199-215 Stop 1. Bastendorff Beach Figure 1‐1. Navigation Leaving OIMB, our first stop is Bastendorff Beach, a short drive over Coos Head. Oregon Beach dynamics The Oregon Coast is highly active, with one of the most energetic wave climates (Figure 1‐2) in the world, and all of that energy pushes a lot of sand around. We all learned about longshore drift in Geo 101, but the pattern in Oregon is fundamentally different. Oregon’s coast is broken into a series of “pocket beach” littoral cells, long stretches of dune or bluff‐backed beach bounded by rocky headlands that extend into water that is deep enough to block sediment transport around the ends of the headlands. There are also large differences in the direction and energy of summer versus winter waves (Figure 1‐3); highly energetic winter waves erode the beaches and move sand offshore to form sand bars, while gentler summer waves restore the sand to the beaches. Within each cell, sand also moves north or south depending on the prevailing wave directions and in response to climate events such as El Nino’s. Here at Bastendorf beach we see evidence for this intra‐cell movement in the form of dramatic accretion of the beach since the construction of the south jetty in the early 1900’s. The beach rapidly accreted (Figure 1‐3) until about 1967, and has reached some state of equilibrium since then.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Sycan Watershed Analysis
    Lower Sycan Watershed Analysis Fremont-Winema National Forest 2005 Lower Sycan River T33S,R12E,S23 Lower Sycan Watershed Analysis Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................... 1 General Watershed Area.....................................................................................................................................2 Geology and Soils.................................................................................................................................................5 Climate..................................................................................................................................................................6 STEP 1. CHARACTERIZATION OF THE WATERSHED ................................................................... 7 I. Watershed and Aquatics.................................................................................................................................7 Soils And Geomorphology...............................................................................................................................................10 Aquatic Habitat ................................................................................................................................................................10 II. Vegetation.....................................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Newsletter of the Pacific Northwest Forest Service Retirees — Fall 2011
    OldSmokeys Newsletter Newsletter of the Pacific Northwest Forest Service Retirees — Fall 2011 President’s Message—John Berry It was good to see and talk with so many of you at the Summer Picnic. Some I had not seen for years and I wished there had been more time to catch up. And it was a pleasure to see the great attendance by Regional Office and Mt. Hood National Forest leaders. It means a lot to have Regional Forester and OldSmokey Kent Connaughton and Forest Supervisor Chris Worth attend our functions. Both are very approachable and great listeners. It’s good to see the Region is in good hands. A big thanks to Mike Ash for donating one of his beautiful wood bowls for the raffle to support the PNWFSA Emergency Relief Fund. And, no, I did not bribe Kent Connaughton to draw my wife’s ticket! Thanks to Rick Larson for reserving the picnic area. Thanks to Bev Pratt, Mary Moyer, and Deb Warren for welcoming and doing the name tags. Of course, Dave Dalton and his crew did a great job of catering. Also, check out Paul Enberg’s and John Poppino’s photos on our website at <www.oldsmokeys.org>. The picnic reminds me what it means to be a member of the “Forest Service Family.” Next to my own family, the Forest Service has been the single most important factor in my life. The Forest Service offered me incredible career opportunities as it p rovided outstanding education and training, good pay, and a retirement annuity that allows my wife and me to live comfortably.
    [Show full text]
  • OR Wild -Backmatter V2
    208 OREGON WILD Afterword JIM CALLAHAN One final paragraph of advice: do not burn yourselves out. Be as I am — a reluctant enthusiast.... a part-time crusader, a half-hearted fanatic. Save the other half of your- selves and your lives for pleasure and adventure. It is not enough to fight for the land; it is even more important to enjoy it. While you can. While it is still here. So get out there and hunt and fish and mess around with your friends, ramble out yonder and explore the forests, climb the mountains, bag the peaks, run the rivers, breathe deep of that yet sweet and lucid air, sit quietly for awhile and contemplate the precious still- ness, the lovely mysterious and awesome space. Enjoy yourselves, keep your brain in your head and your head firmly attached to the body, the body active and alive and I promise you this much: I promise you this one sweet victory over our enemies, over those desk-bound men with their hearts in a safe-deposit box and their eyes hypnotized by desk calculators. I promise you this: you will outlive the bastards. —Edward Abbey1 Edward Abbey. Ed, take it from another Ed, not only can wilderness lovers outlive wilderness opponents, we can also defeat them. The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men (sic) UNIVERSITY, SHREVEPORT UNIVERSITY, to do nothing. MES SMITH NOEL COLLECTION, NOEL SMITH MES NOEL COLLECTION, MEMORIAL LIBRARY, LOUISIANA STATE LOUISIANA LIBRARY, MEMORIAL —Edmund Burke2 JA Edmund Burke. 1 Van matre, Steve and Bill Weiler.
    [Show full text]
  • John Allen: Bringing Stakeholders Together to Restore the Forest and Protect Communities
    John Allen: Bringing Stakeholders Together to Restore the Forest and Protect Communities By Chris McGowan If there is one phrase that best summarizes John Allen’s career philosophy, it might be “shared stewardship.” In his supervision of forest restoration, collaborative programs, and friends’ groups, he has repeatedly taken the initiative to bring stakeholders together to implement projects. This is necessary in part because there is no one answer when it comes to reducing devastating wildfires, saving old-growth forest, protecting watershed, extracting resources, or managing recreational use of the land. A holistic approach must be used that brings all the interested parties together. A Legislative Tour of the Deschutes National Forest on October 22, 2014: (left to right) Oregon Rep. Brad Witt; Deschutes National Forest Supervisor John Allen; U.S. Forest Service Regional Forester Jim Peña; Oregon Rep. Gene Whisnant; Oregon Sen. Michael Dembrow; Oregon Sen. Herman Baertschiger (front); Oregon State Forester Doug Decker; Natural Resources Policy Advisor to Governor Kitzhaber, Brett Brownscombe. (source: Oregon Dept. of Forestry). “Our culture is reevaluating and redefining its relationship with our natural resources. And people are starting to better understand that you can’t just solve the water issue by itself, the recreation issue by itself, or the timber issue by itself. It’s all connected, it’s all integrated. You can’t just solve your particular piece of the forest that you’re interested in, and that’s the challenge for land management agencies. That’s our mission, to integrate all of the resources into a long-term sustainable solution,” says Allen, the Supervisor of the Deschutes National Forest, who is retiring after four decades of working for the USFS.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 98-328-June 26, 1984
    98 STAT. 272 PUBLIC LAW 98-328-JUNE 26, 1984 Public Law 98-328 98th Congress An Act June 26, 1984 To designate certain national forest system and other lands in the State of Oregon for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System, and for other purposes. [H.R. 1149] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Oregon United States ofAmerica in Congress assembled, That this Act may Wilderness Act be referred to as the "Oregon Wilderness Act of 1984". of 1984. National SEc. 2. (a) The Congress finds that- Wilderness (1) many areas of undeveloped National Forest System land in Preservation the State of Oregon possess outstanding natural characteristics System. which give them high value as wilderness and will, if properly National Forest preserved, contribute as an enduring resource of wilderness for System. the ben~fit of the American people; (2) the Department of Agriculture's second roadless area review and evaluation (RARE II) of National Forest System lands in the State of Oregon and the related congressional review of such lands have identified areas which, on the basis of their landform, ecosystem, associated wildlife, and location, will help to fulfill the National Forest System's share of a quality National Wilderness Preservation System; and (3) the Department of Agriculture's second roadless area review and evaluation of National Forest System lands in the State of Oregon and the related congressional review of such lands have also identified areas which do not possess outstand­ ing wilderness attributes or which possess outstanding energy, mineral, timber, grazing, dispersed recreation and other values and which should not now be designated as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System but should be avail­ able for nonwilderness multiple uses under the land manage­ ment planning process and other applicable laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Fremont – Winema National Forests
    FREMONT – WINEMA NATIONAL FORESTS TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE REPORT FY 2002 by Brent D. Frazier Forest Biologist March 6, 2003 TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE REPORT FY2002 OBJECTIVE The objective of this report is to provide biologists and managers of the Fremont – Winema National Forests a tool to document terrestrial wildlife budgets and accomplishments, including various activity reports, over time. BUDGET The NFWF Working Budget plus carry over was: $1,200,000 Fire suppression “borrowed: 200,000 The unobligated balance was: 133,000 Total expenditures for NFWF in FY2002 were: $ 867,000 Terrestrial Wildlife was planned at approximately 40% of the total allocation. Of this, 30% of the total was planned for terrestrial non-TES wildlife and 10% for terrestrial TES wildlife. Of the remaining NFWF funds, approximately 10% was planned for botany, 40% for fisheries, and 10% for TES fish. SUMMARY OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS Table 1. Accomplishment Accomplishment Fremont Winema Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive Species Structures 0 0 Acres 2 3 Other Wildlife Structures 0 0 Acres 708 2,515 ACTIVITIES SPOTTED OWL DEMOGRAPHIC STUDY The southern Cascades spotted owl demographic study conducted by Oregon State University continued in 2002. The study collects information on adult and juvenile survival rate, reproductive rates, annual rate of population change, and other characteristics of spotted owl in the southern Cascades, including the Klamath Ranger District. For 2002 on the Klamath District, forty-seven nest sites were visited (Anthony, R. and others, 2002). Twenty-six nests were occupied by spotted owl and thirteen of the sites produced twenty- five young. Of the forty-seven sites, fourteen were occupied by barred owl pairs or barred owl males.
    [Show full text]
  • (USDA) Forest Service Working with Partners for Bird Conservation
    U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service Appendix A Working with Partners for Bird Conservation Bird Conservation Accomplishments Published 2004 This appendix lists the bird conservation accomplishment projects by USDA Forest Service Deputy Areas: National Forest Systems, Research and Development, State and Private and International Programs. This is not a complete set of the many bird conservation actions that have been or are currently being implemented across Forest Service Deputy Areas. It represents bird conservation accomplishment projects from the administrative units that replied at the time of the request. Projects started before fiscal year 2000 that are ongoing or conducted annually (beyond 2002) are reported as “ongoing” or “annually”, with the date of inception included (when known). I. National Forest Systems Region 1 (R-1): Northern Region Regionwide Accomplishments Partnership Enhancement • Partners in Flight (PIF) and Bird Conservation Region (BCR) Plans. Forest Service biologists throughout the Northern Region participated in the development of PIF and BCR plans for Montana, Idaho, North Dakota, and South Dakota. Active participation is ongoing with PIF working groups, BCR coordinators, joint venture meetings, and other activities that promote bird conservation. Partners in these efforts include the American Bird Conservancy (ABC), Montana Fish, Wildlife, & Parks (MFWP), Idaho Department of Fish and Game 1 (Idaho Fish & Game), U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS), Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Potlatch Corp., Plum Creek Timber Co., local Audubon Society Chapters, and the Universities of Montana and Idaho. Ongoing since FY1993. • Montana Sage Grouse and Sagebrush Conservation Strategy. The Northern Region participated in the Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks-led effort to develop a statewide sage grouse and sagebrush conservation strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State
    Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Alabama Cheaha Wilderness Talladega National Forest 7,400 0 7,400 Dugger Mountain Wilderness** Talladega National Forest 9,048 0 9,048 Sipsey Wilderness William B. Bankhead National Forest 25,770 83 25,853 Alabama Totals 42,218 83 42,301 Alaska Chuck River Wilderness 74,876 520 75,396 Coronation Island Wilderness Tongass National Forest 19,118 0 19,118 Endicott River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 98,396 0 98,396 Karta River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 39,917 7 39,924 Kootznoowoo Wilderness Tongass National Forest 979,079 21,741 1,000,820 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 654 654 Kuiu Wilderness Tongass National Forest 60,183 15 60,198 Maurille Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 4,814 0 4,814 Misty Fiords National Monument Wilderness Tongass National Forest 2,144,010 235 2,144,245 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Petersburg Creek-Duncan Salt Chuck Wilderness Tongass National Forest 46,758 0 46,758 Pleasant/Lemusurier/Inian Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 23,083 41 23,124 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Russell Fjord Wilderness Tongass National Forest 348,626 63 348,689 South Baranof Wilderness Tongass National Forest 315,833 0 315,833 South Etolin Wilderness Tongass National Forest 82,593 834 83,427 Refresh Date: 10/14/2017
    [Show full text]
  • Eg-Or-Index-170722.05.Pdf
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Burns Paiute Tribal Reservation G-6 Siletz Reservation B-4 Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Reservation B-3 Umatilla Indian Reservation G-2 Fort McDermitt Indian Reservation H-9,10 Warm Springs Indian Reservation D-3,4 Ankeny National Wildlife Refuge B-4 Basket Slough National Wildlife Refuge B-4 Badger Creek Wilderness D-3 Bear Valley National Wildlife Refuge D-9 9 Menagerie Wilderness C-5 Middle Santiam Wilderness C-4 Mill Creek Wilderness E-4,5 Black Canyon Wilderness F-5 Monument Rock Wilderness G-5 Boulder Creek Wilderness C-7 Mount Hood National Forest C-4 to D-2 Bridge Creek Wilderness E-5 Mount Hood Wilderness D-3 Bull of the Woods Wilderness C,D-4 Mount Jefferson Wilderness D-4,5 Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument C-9,10 Mount Thielsen Wilderness C,D-7 Clackamas Wilderness C-3 to D-4 Mount Washington Wilderness D-5 Cold Springs National Wildlife Refuge F-2 Mountain Lakes Wilderness C-9 Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area Newberry National Volcanic Monument D-6 C-2 to E-2 North Fork John Day Wilderness G-3,4 Columbia White Tailed Deer National Wildlife North Fork Umatilla Wilderness G-2 Refuge B-1 Ochoco National Forest E-4 to F-6 Copper Salmon Wilderness A-8 Olallie Scenic Area D-4 Crater Lake National Park C-7,8 Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area C-4 Crooked River National Grassland D-4 to E-5 Opal Creek Wilderness C-4 Cummins Creek Wilderness A,B-5 Oregon Badlands Wilderness D-5 to E-6 Deschutes National Forest C-7 to D-4 Oregon Cascades Recreation Area C,D-7 Diamond Craters Natural Area F-7 to G-8 Oregon
    [Show full text]