National and Colorado Politics and Policies in 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

National and Colorado Politics and Policies in 2015 WHAT’S LOOMING OVER YOUR HEAD? NATIONAL AND COLORADO POLITICS AND POLICIES IN 2015 Wednesday, March 4, 2015 WHAT’S LOOMING OVER YOUR HEAD? NATIONAL AND COLORADO POLITICS AND POLICIES IN 2015 Wednesday, March 4, 2015 WELCOME Kirk Monroe EVP, Director of Wholesale Banking Vectra Bank Colorado SPEAKER INTRODUCTION Michael Lewis Managing Partner RubinBrown Floyd Ciruli is a pollster and political analyst providing consulting, strategy, policy management, public opinion research, public relations and management. Clients include major Colorado corporations, business and civic associations. Among Denver–based Ciruli Associates’ specialties is consulting for government, nonprofit and corporate organizations proposing initiatives for public approval. The New Political Environment Opportunity and Risk Floyd Ciruli March 2015 Ciruli Associates 1115 Grant St., Ste G‐6 Denver, CO 80203 PH (303) 399‐3173 FAX (303) 399‐3147 www.ciruli.com The New Colorado Election System 2014 election – The new Colorado election system Nationalization of election . All Obama, all the time . Harry vs. Mitch show Proliferation of forecasts . Who’s in and out . Who’s up and down Money is overwhelming . Mostly “independent,” out-of-state . TV is still king, advertisements at saturation Power of media . Endorsements . Debates, truth tests . Ideological web platforms 7 Ciruli Associates 2015 U.S. Generations Years Ages High School Formative Born Today Years Experiences Greatest 1900-1924 90-114 1915-1938 WWI, Roaring Twenties, Crash, Generation Depression Silent Generation 1925-1945 69-89 1939-1959 End of WWII, Cold War, Post-war boom, civil rights Baby Boomers 1946-1964 50-68 1960-1978 Cold War, urban riots, Kennedy, space, King, Vietnam, protest, Woodstock, Haight-Ashbury, Nixon, Silent Majority Generation X 1965-1982 32-49 1979-1996 Feminism, MTV, Chernobyl, Reagan, AIDS, end of Soviet empire, Rodney King, globalization, Clinton Millennials/ 1983-2000 14-31 1997-2016 Internet, Columbine, Y2K, smartphone, Generation Y Bush, Twin Towers, Katrina, War on Terror, Iraq, Great Recession, Obama, social media, reality TV, gay rights, legal pot Generation Z 2001- 1-13 2015- Ciruli Associates 2014 8 Ciruli Associates 2015 Millennials Size of Generations Numbers in Short Generation Ages 2015 2050 Millennial 18-34 75 million 79 million Generation X 35-50 66 million 50 million Baby Boomer 51-69 75 million 17 million Silent 70-87 29 million -- Greatest 88 and older ? -- Source: Pew Research 2015 Formatted: Ciruli Associates 2015 Ideology of Generations Liberal Moderate Conservative Gap Millennial (18-34) 30% 40% 28% -2 Generation X (35-50) 23 39 35 +12 Baby Boomers (51-69) 21 33 44 +23 Silent/Greatest (over 69) 17 33 48 +31 Overall 24 36 38 +14 Source: Pew Research 2015 Formatted: Ciruli Associates 2015 9 Ciruli Associates 2015 Changes in Colorado Voters’ Social Viewpoints Legalize Recreational Marijuana and Approve Civil Unions Colorado 2006 and 2012 Yes 2006 Legalize 41% 14 percentage No 2006 59% point shift from 2006 to 2012 Yes 2012 Legalize 55% No 2012 45% 1992 Yes 2006 Civil unions 47% Amendment 43: No 2006 Civil unions 53% yes 56%; prohibited Yes 2013 Poll 71% No 2013 Poll minority status 22% for gays Sources: Colorado Secretary of the State, 2006, 2013; Quinnipiac 2013 Formatted: Ciruli Associates 2014 10 Ciruli Associates 2015 One Country – Two Governments White House and Congress Different elections • 2008, 2012 vs. 2010, 2014 • Democrats vs. Republicans Different constituencies • Young vs. old President • College educated vs. attended Senate Majority Leader Barack Obama • Color vs. White Mitch McConnell Different powers • Executive vs. Finance • Pulpit vs. courts Different agendas • Immigration • Foreign policy o Iran, Ukraine, ISIS Vice President • Spending vs. debt House Speaker Joe Biden • Equality vs. growth John Boehner 11 Ciruli Associates 2015 2014: Wave or No Wave Nationalization or All Elections are Local or Both President Obama’s Approval Ratings Metrics 2012-2015 60% 50% 54% 52% 56% 51% 49% 50% 49% 50% • Obama spread – (4%) 50% • Congressional approval – 19% 48% 48% 40% 47% 43% 47% 46% • Generic ballot test – Reps 2% 42% 40% 44% • Direction, right – 33% 30% • House 234, need 17/lost 13 (30) • Senate 45, need 6/won 9 (5) Approval Disapproval 188 Source: Real Clear Politics 2013/14/15 44 (2) 247 (+13) 54 (+9) Formatted: Ciruli Associates 2015 House Minority Leader Senate Majority Leader Speaker Senator Nancy Pelosi Harry Reid John Boehner Mitch McConnell 12 Ciruli Associates 2015 Bennet is on Deck Democrats Need 5 Seats to Win Back Senate in 2016 There are several factors that point to his initial advantages going into the election: • Voter turnout will be up to presidential levels. The 2 million this year will balloon to 2.8 or 3.0 million. Many of the less frequent voters lean Democratic. • Bennet works his Washington and Senate networks for maximum advantage. He’s substantially less publicity shy than Mark Udall. It’s assumed he’ll be ready with a powerful resume and a substantial war chest. Denver Post likes him. • The Republican bench in Colorado is thin if current officeholders are the main prospective candidates. Congressman Coffman and State Treasurer Stapleton may not be interested. But there are several factors that point to a tough race for Bennet: • The Democratic nominee for president and Democratic senators up for re-election will likely be running with a very unpopular president. Historically, passing on the presidency to the same party after an unpopular president is difficult. 13 Ciruli Associates 2015 Hillary – Inevitable? Hillary Clinton was called inevitable in 2008. She lost to Barack Obama. Is she inevitable today? Hillary Clinton Bill Clinton 2007-2008 2015-2016 • 40% ahead • 60% ahead • Behind in Iowa polls • Ahead in Iowa, New Hampshire • Obama and Edwards doing well in • Biden, no traction (VP), Warren, invisible primary modest support – not running • Obama already declared • No one declared, no other money • She voted for war • No obvious issues with base of • Black voters for Obama opposition (deep liberals) • Got 48% even with handicaps • Women leadership 14 Ciruli Associates 2015 Control of U.S. Senate 2014 Forecasts Mostly Right; Miss Size of Republican Tide Montana November 4 and Results New Hampshire R-18 (18) South Dakota Iowa D-1 (4) R-11 (20) R-2 (8) Kentucky R-7 (15) West Virginia R-16 (28) North Carolina D-1 (R-2) Colorado Georgia R-2 (2) R-3 (8) Win the Senate Kansas Arkansas I-1 (R-11) 538 – 75% R Alaska R-7 (16) Huffington Post – 77% R R-2 (4) Louisiana New York Times – 70% R R-5 (13) R win 7, maybe 9 15 Ciruli Associates 2015 Forecasts and Results on Udall vs. Gardner Calling the Race, Election Night Narrative, Final Results Udall Will Lose November 4, 2014 Forecast % New York Times 80 R FiveThirtyEight 81 R Huffington Post 66 R “The forecasters, such as Washington Post 97 R FiveThirtyEight, New York Times, Washington Post and Year Candidate Vote % Difference Huffington Post, are 2008 Udall D 1,230,994 53 240,239 predicting Cory Gardner the Schaffer R 990,755 42 Senate winner with higher and higher percentages.” 2014 Udall D 944,201 46 39,888 The Buzz, 10-30-14 Gardner R 983,889 48 16 Ciruli Associates 2015 New Model: Udall Loses With Swing Counties Hickenlooper Udall Adams Wins by 7,000 Wins by 4,000 Arapahoe Wins by 18,000 Wins by 3,000 Jefferson Wins by 15,000 Wins by 900 Larimer Wins by 7,000 Loses by 600 Gov. John Former Hickenlooper Pueblo Wins by 3,000 Wins by 300 Sen. Mark Udall Ciruli Associates 2014 17 Ciruli Associates 2015 1972, 1992, 2002, 2014 Colorado Politics in the ‘70s 1972 Olympic bid defeated 61% 1972 Wayne Aspinall, Mr. Chairman, defeated 1972 Pat Schroeder goes to Congress 1974 Nixon resigns (August) 1974 Dick Lamm, Gary Hart, Tim Wirth, Sam Brown elected 1974 Democrats take State House, lose it in 1976 Colorado Politics in the 2000s All Republican All Democrat Divided Offices 2002 2008 2014 Results Governor Owens R Ritter D Hickenlooper D U.S. Senate Campbell R Salazar D Bennet D U.S. Senate Allard R Udall D Gardner R Congress 5R, 2D 2R, 5D 4R, 3D Colorado House 37R, 28D 27R, 37D 3 seats D Colorado Senate 18R, 17D 14R, 21D 1 seat R President Bush 8% (2000) Obama 9% Obama 5% Bush 5% (2004) 18 Ciruli Associates 2015 Denver Mayor Unopposed? Denver Mayors 1968 - 2014 Bill McNichols 1968-1983 (4 terms) Federico Peña 1983-1991 (2 terms) Wellington Webb 1991-2003 (3 terms) John Hickenlooper 2003-2011 (2 terms) Former Mayor Mayor Michael Bill McNichols Michael Hancock 2011-2015 (1 term) Hancock Ciruli Associates 2014 Note: McNichols served 3 years remaining on Tom Currigan’s second term. John Hickenlooper resigned to run for governor of Colorado near the end of his second term. He was replaced for 7 months by Bill Vidal (Jan. 12 to Jul. 18, 2011). Floyd Ciruli “There is generally a good feeling about the city right now,” he said. “And Hancock nicely represents a fulcrum point in the politics of the city. He is not too left or not too right.” “Ultimately, the final thing is leadership,” Ciruli said. “Is there someone with the name ID and money and grassroots support — not just a gadfly or marginal candidate? I don't see that person.” (Denver Post, 2-1-15) 19 Ciruli Associates 2015 Denver Metro Population Triples in 50 Years Denver Drops From Half to a Fifth of Population Denver Metro Population 1960 - 2010 Denver Metro Denver % of Year Population % Change Population % Change Metro Population 1960 493,887 - 934,199 - 52% 1970 514,678 4 1,235,936 32 42 1980 492,365 -4 1,618,461 31 30 1990
Recommended publications
  • GOVERNING Magazine April 2018
    THE STATES AND LOCALITIES April 2018 MouseThe 800lb. Trying to govern in Anaheim, the ultimate one-company town GOV04_Cover.indd 18 3/12/18 11:50 AM __________Designer __________Creative Dir. 100 Blue Ravine Road Folsom, CA 95630 916-932-1300 __________Editorial __________Prepress www.erepublic.com CMY grey T1 T2 T3 5 25 50 75 95 100 5 25 50 75 95 100 5 25 50 75 95 100 5 25 50 75 95 100 Page # __________Other ____________OK to go BLACK YELLOW MAGENTA CYAN PROTECTING THE PUBLIC SECTOR FROM RANSOMWARE State and local government agencies are being held hostage by À´¿¼¶¼ÂÈÆ´·É¸Åƴż¸Æ´Á·ÆÂìʴŸ·¸Æ¼ºÁ¸·ÇÂÆǸ´¿·´Ç´ How prepared is your organization to deal with a ransomware attack? Take 3 minutes to learn more: att.com/govsecurity ACCESS GRANTED AT&T FIREWALLS Fully managed security services to help prevent unauthorized ACCESS DENIED access to your network AT&T THREAT MANAGER At-a-glance, situational threat awareness for multiple sites and “state of the org” view AT&T CYBERSECURITY VULNERABILITY CONSULTING ASSESSMENT Lifecycle approach to vulnerability, threat management and path to compliance AT&T SECURE EMAIL GATEWAY ¸ÆǼÁ¶¿´ÆƸÀ´¼¿è¿Ç¸Å¼Áº and threat detection All AT&T Cybersecurity solutions are powered by AT&T Threat Intellect. © 2017 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property. __________Designer __________Creative Dir. 100 Blue Ravine Road Folsom, CA 95630 916-932-1300 __________Editorial __________Prepress www.erepublic.com CMY grey T1 T2 T3 5 25 50 75 95 100 5 25 50 75 95 100 5 25 50 75 95 100 5 25 50 75 95 100 Page # __________Other ____________OK to go BLACK YELLOW MAGENTA CYAN VOL.
    [Show full text]
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— Extensions of Remarks E222 HON
    E222 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — Extensions of Remarks February 13, 2003 Today, I honor him and ask all my col- For example, in the summer of 2000 two In addition, the bill would authorize the Sec- leagues to join me in remembering this politi- recreational off-road vehicle users ignored clo- retary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agri- cian and great leader from the great State of sure signs while four-wheel driving on Bureau culture to apply any funds acquired from rec- Florida. of Land Management land high above reational off-road vehicle violations to the area f Silverton, Colorado. As a result, they got stuck that was damaged or affected by such viola- for five days on a 70 percent slope at 12,500 tions, and to increase public awareness of the RESPONSIBLE OFF-ROAD VEHICLE feet along the flanks of Houghton Mountain. need for proper use of vehicles on federal ENFORCEMENT AND RESPONSE At first, they abandoned their vehicles. lands. (‘‘ROVER’’) ACT Then, they returned with other vehicles to pull This would give these agencies additional their vehicles out of the mud and off the resources to recover damaged lands and HON. MARK UDALL mountain. The result was significant damage areas that may be exposed to repeated viola- OF COLORADO to the high alpine tundra, a delicate ecosystem tions. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES that may take thousands of years to recover. The bill does not put any lands ‘‘off limits’’ Wednesday, February 12, 2003 As noted in a Denver Post story about this in- to recreational off-road vehicle use.
    [Show full text]
  • Sen. Cory Gardner
    COVERING FOR CORRUPTION PART THREE: SEN. CORY GARDNER A SPECIAL REPORT FROM THE CONGRESSIONAL INTEGRITY PROJECT Ensuring that public officials are working in the public interest is one of Congress’s most important responsibilities. But year after year, some lawmakers get it backwards: They attempt to distract the public from real corruption while they use their positions to enrich themselves and those close to them. Sen. Cory Gardner (R) of Colorado has a history of taking policy positions that benefit his wife’s business interests as a consultant and advocate for fossil fuels—and by extension, his family’s bottom line. This report, part three of our “Covering for Corruption” series, details how Sen. Gardner’s official actions overlap with entities Jaime Gardner has worked for or represented. For years, the Gardners have skirted ethics rules so that Jaime can profit off of fossil fuels while Cory boosts those same industries through official actions. While we do not know exactly how much the Gardners have profited from this arrangement, it reeks of the self-dealing that Washington insiders love but voters despise. And while his family profits, Cory Gardner uses his public platform to moralize against self-dealing. Gardner should come clean to his constituents about his intermingled public and private interests by disclosing his wife’s client lists and any overlap with industries that have business in front of the legislatives bodies he’s served in. We can’t force Gardner to act with integrity. But we can expose his record to stop him from misleading and manipulating voters.
    [Show full text]
  • The Senate in Transition Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Nuclear Option1
    \\jciprod01\productn\N\NYL\19-4\NYL402.txt unknown Seq: 1 3-JAN-17 6:55 THE SENATE IN TRANSITION OR HOW I LEARNED TO STOP WORRYING AND LOVE THE NUCLEAR OPTION1 William G. Dauster* The right of United States Senators to debate without limit—and thus to filibuster—has characterized much of the Senate’s history. The Reid Pre- cedent, Majority Leader Harry Reid’s November 21, 2013, change to a sim- ple majority to confirm nominations—sometimes called the “nuclear option”—dramatically altered that right. This article considers the Senate’s right to debate, Senators’ increasing abuse of the filibuster, how Senator Reid executed his change, and possible expansions of the Reid Precedent. INTRODUCTION .............................................. 632 R I. THE NATURE OF THE SENATE ........................ 633 R II. THE FOUNDERS’ SENATE ............................. 637 R III. THE CLOTURE RULE ................................. 639 R IV. FILIBUSTER ABUSE .................................. 641 R V. THE REID PRECEDENT ............................... 645 R VI. CHANGING PROCEDURE THROUGH PRECEDENT ......... 649 R VII. THE CONSTITUTIONAL OPTION ........................ 656 R VIII. POSSIBLE REACTIONS TO THE REID PRECEDENT ........ 658 R A. Republican Reaction ............................ 659 R B. Legislation ...................................... 661 R C. Supreme Court Nominations ..................... 670 R D. Discharging Committees of Nominations ......... 672 R E. Overruling Home-State Senators ................. 674 R F. Overruling the Minority Leader .................. 677 R G. Time To Debate ................................ 680 R CONCLUSION................................................ 680 R * Former Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy for U.S. Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid. The author has worked on U.S. Senate and White House staffs since 1986, including as Staff Director or Deputy Staff Director for the Committees on the Budget, Labor and Human Resources, and Finance.
    [Show full text]
  • USSYP 2010 Yearbook.Pdf
    THE HEARST FOUNDATIONS DIRECTORS William Randolph Hearst III UNTED STATE PESIDENTR James M. Asher Anissa B. Balson David J. Barrett S Frank A. Bennack, Jr. SE NAT E YO John G. Conomikes Ronald J. Doerfler George R. Hearst, Jr. John R. Hearst, Jr. U Harvey L. Lipton T Gilbert C. Maurer H PROGR A M Mark F. Miller Virginia H. Randt Paul “Dino” Dinovitz EXCUTIE V E DIRECTOR F ORT Rayne B. Guilford POAR GR M DI RECTOR Y - U N ITED S TATES SE NATE YOUTH PROGR A M E IGHT H A N N U A L WA S H INGTON WEEK 2010 sponsored BY THE UNITED STATES SENATE UNITED STATES SENATE YOUTH PROGRAM FUNDED AND ADMINISTERED BY THE THE HEARST FOUNDATIONS FORTY-EIGHTH ANNUAL WASHINGTON WEEK H M ARCH 6 – 1 3 , 2 0 1 0 90 NEW MONTGOMERY STREET · SUITE 1212 · SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-4504 WWW.USSENATEYOUTH.ORG Photography by Jakub Mosur Secondary Photography by Erin Lubin Design by Catalone Design Co. “ERE TH IS A DEBT OF SERV ICE DUE FROM EV ERY M A N TO HIS COUNTRY, PROPORTIONED TO THE BOUNTIES W HICH NATUR E A ND FORTUNE H AV E ME ASURED TO HIM.” —TA H O M S J E F F E R S ON 2010 UNITED STATES SENATE YOUTH PROGR A M SENATE A DVISORY COMMITTEE HONOR ARY CO-CH AIRS SENATOR V ICE PRESIDENT SENATOR HARRY REID JOSEPH R. BIDEN MITCH McCONNELL Majority Leader President of the Senate Republican Leader CO-CH AIRS SENATOR SENATOR ROBERT P.
    [Show full text]
  • I Iistory Ofsoence
    ISSN 0739-4934 NEWSLETTER I IISTORY OFSOENCE .~.o.~.~.~.~.Js.4 ..N· u·M·B·ER.. 2............ _________ S00E~~ 1984 HSS EXECUTIVE PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE ADDRESS PRESIDENT EDWARD GRANT, Indiana University VICE-PRESIDENT WILLIAM COLEMAN, University of BY GERALD HOLTON Wisconsin - Madison SECRETI\RY AUDREY DAVIS, Smithsonian Institution DELIVERED AT THE ANNUAL HSS BANQUET, 1REASURER PALMER HOUSE HOTEL, Cl-ITCAGO, SPENCER R. WEART, American Institute of Physics 29 DECEMBER 1985 EDITOR ARNOLD THACKRAY, University of Pennsylvania It is surely appropriate, and should routinely be the case, that a retiring presi­ dent of a professional society give some accounting of his stewardship. Which The History of Science Society was founded in of the expectations raised four years earlier, when he ran for office, have been 1924 to secure the future of Isis, the international reasonably fulfilled? Which of the promises were kept, and which proved to be review that George Sarton (1884-19561 bad too difficult for the time being, despite best efforts? Where does the Society now founded in Belgium in 1912. The Society seeks to stand, viewed as an organization whose main purpose is to support the work foster interest in the history of science and its so­ cial and cultural relations, to provide a forum for and careers of its members? And what must still be done in this period of discussion, and to promote scholarly research in growth, by each of us pitching in on some task? the history of science. The Society pursues these To discuss these issues is to point out the opportunities for your personal and objectives by the publication of its journal Isis, by continued involvement in the affairs of our Society.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Park Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior State of the Park Report Rocky Mountain National Park Colorado December 2017 National Park Service. 2017. State of the Park Report for Rocky Mountain National Park. State of the Park Series No. 50. National Park Service, Washington, DC. On the cover: Hallett Peak reflected in Dream Lake. NPS Photo. Disclaimer. This State of the Park report summarizes the current condition of park resources, visitor experience, and park infrastructure as assessed by a combination of available factual information and the expert opinion and professional judgment of park staff and subject matter experts. The internet version of this report provides additional details and sources of information about the findings summarized in the report, including references, accounts on the origin and quality of the data, and the methods and analytic approaches used in data collection and assessments of condition. This report provides evaluations of status and trends based on interpretation by NPS scientists and managers of both quantitative and non-quantitative assessments and observations. Future condition ratings may differ from findings in this report as new data and knowledge become available. The park superintendent approved the publication of this report. Executive Summary The mission of the National Park Service is to preserve unimpaired the natural and cultural resources and values of national parks for the enjoyment, education, and inspiration of this and future generations. NPS Management Policies (2006) state that “The Service will also strive to ensure that park resources and values are passed on to future generations in a condition that is as good as, or better than, the conditions that exist today.” As part of the stewardship of national parks for the American people, the NPS has begun to develop State of the Park reports to assess the overall status and trends of each park’s resources.
    [Show full text]
  • The Southern Sangre De Cristo Landscape What’S Inside
    Our Land Our Water Our Future COLORADO OPEN L ANDSCAPES A NEWSLETTER OF COLORADO OPEN LANDS The Southern Sangres contain layer upon layer of conservation values in their rich history, outstanding natural habitat, and unforgettable scenic views. The Southern Sangre de Cristo Landscape What’s Inside —Developing a Community Vision of Conservation President’s Letter At Uptop Ghost Town, you will not only get a sense of Colorado in the late Page 3 1800s and early 1900s, but on a clear day you’ll enjoy a stunning view of the Spanish Peaks and you may even spot a Bald Eagle flying overhead or a bobcat foraging in Stewardship Corner the woods. If you’re really lucky, you may also get to meet two of the most energetic Page 5 Two landowners and historians/conservationists in Southern Colorado. their management teams receive Sisters Deborah Lathrop and Dianne (Sam) Lathrop Law moved to Colorado in awards for managing their ranches 2001 and fell in love with the ghost town and forest lands located on Old La Veta Pass sustainably. in Huerfano County. The sisters bought the property, named the ghost town ‘Uptop’, and set about restoring and uncovering the history of the 1877 train depot and the Board Spotlight 1920s chapel, dance hall/tavern, school house, lumber mill and outbuildings. Ruth Wright Their greatest concern was that one day someone might purchase the property Page 6 Board member Ruth who would be more interested in its potential for large summer homes or an RV park— Wright shares her enthusiasm for the fate of many of the neighboring lands.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Senate Joint Resolution 14-013 By
    2014 SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION 14-013 BY SENATOR(S) Cadman and Carroll, Aguilar, Balmer, Baumgardner, Brophy, Crowder, Grantham, Guzman, Harvey, Heath, Herpin, Hill, Hodge, Jahn, Johnston, Jones, Kefalas, Kerr, King, Lambert, Lundberg, Marble, Newell, Nicholson, Renfroe, Rivera, Roberts, Scheffel, Schwartz, Steadman, Tochtrop, Todd, Ulibarri, Zenzinger; also REPRESENTATIVE(S) DelGrosso and Ferrandino, Becker, Buck, Buckner, Conti, Coram, Court, Dore, Everett, Exum, Fields, Fischer, Foote, Garcia, Gardner, Gerou, Ginal, Hamner, Holbert, Hullinghorst, Humphrey, Joshi, Kagan, Kraft-Tharp, Labuda, Landgraf, Lawrence, Lebsock, Lee, May, McCann, McLachlan, McNulty, Melton, Mitsch Bush, Moreno, Murray, Navarro, Nordberg, Pabon, Peniston, Pettersen, Primavera, Priola, Rankin, Ryden, Saine, Salazar, Schafer, Scott, Singer, Sonnenberg, Stephens, Swalm, Szabo, Tyler, Vigil, Waller, Williams, Wilson, Wright, Young. CONCERNING SUPPORT FOR DENVER'S BID TO HOST THE 2016 REPUBLICAN NATIONAL CONVENTION. WHEREAS, Civic, business, and political leaders launched an effort for Denver to host the 2016 Republican National Convention; and WHEREAS, Because Denver successfully hosted the Democratic National Convention in 2008, the city is well-prepared to handle the 2016 Republican National Convention; and WHEREAS, Colorado and the Denver metropolitan area contain world-class infrastructure, including Denver International Airport, Regional Transportation District light rail and bus service, convention centers, sports arenas, and hotels, making Denver well-equipped
    [Show full text]
  • Responds to 781229 Ltr from CO Dept of Health Re License for Storage of U
    . - . ~ . - . - - . _ _ . ._ - - - - 4-. -- --------:--- ------:---- .- . .e ~ i I N _ !fi r5 ?.aj m *. RANCHERS EXPLORATION'AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION f Box 6217 /1776 Montano Road. N.W. / Aa::i,erde Ne JAenco 87197 / Teleroce (505) 344-3542 kB- -' ~ _ m r 13 g p'i3 "Eebruas) I4,1979 " .. '.- J - s' ps , Dr. Frank R. Traylor, Jr., M.Q.'I . 3!CII ~ / ' Executive Director ''''' ,, -y , Colorado Department of Health ,Q. 4210 East lith Avenue ' Denver, Colorado 80220 C ' ' 'A Re: Ranchers' Durango Tailings Project Dear Dr. Traylor: It is my understanding that you are now the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Health (CDH), having succeeded Dr. Thomas M. Vernon, M.D. I wish to speak with you about the department 's re= arks on current licensing of the uranium mill tailings at Durango, Colorado. Dr. Vernon states in a December 29, 1978 letter to me that, ". .the current license for storage of the tailings at the site in Durango remains in ef fect. Requirements for main- " taining the current stabilization of the tailings, property access and annual reporting also re=ain in effect." My question to you is, why does Ranchers need a license just to leave the tailings where they are? Are you telling us that the tailings piles are inherently dangerous? In light of CDH's action of denying Ranchers' application to move the tailings, we feel the reference to licensing and stabilization is unnecessary and that any such efforts on our part would not be justified. We would appreciate an early response from your agency as to the rationale for any current licensing, stabilization, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Lamm
    RICHARD LAMM. Born 1935. Transcript of OH 1395V This interview was recorded on December 13, 2005, for the Maria Rogers Oral History Program and the Rocky Flats Cold War Museum. The interviewer is Hannah Nordhaus. The interview is also available in video format, filmed by Hannah Nordhaus. The interview was transcribed by Sandy Adler. ABSTRACT: Former Colorado Governor Richard Lamm talks about the political issues raised by the Rocky Flats nuclear weapons plant during his administration, including potential public health dangers of the plant, reasons for closure of the plant, working with the union, the Lamm-Wirth Task Force, and how the Cold War and mistrust in government during that time period impacted Rocky Flats. He also discusses Project Rulison, environmentalism, the Democratic Party, and national security in the post-9/11 world. NOTE: Interviewer’s questions and comment appear in parentheses. Added material appears in brackets. [A]. 00:00 (…the Rocky Flats Oral History Project. I’m interviewing Governor Richard Lamm. It is the 13th of December, 2005. We’re in Governor Lamm’s office at the University of Denver. We’re recording.) (Governor Lamm, to start with, if you could just give me a little bit about your background, when you were born, where you were born?) I was born in 1935 in Madison, Wisconsin, grew up in northern Illinois and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Came to Colorado in the army in 1957. Went to Berkeley to law school and came back to Colorado after law school not knowing a soul, but we’ve been here continuously since 1961. (How did you end up being Governor?) John F.
    [Show full text]
  • Monmouth University Poll COLORADO: TIGHT RACE FOR
    Please attribute this information to: Monmouth University Poll West Long Branch, NJ 07764 www.monmouth.edu/polling _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Released: Contact: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 PATRICK MURRAY 732-979-6769 (cell); 732-263-5858 (office) [email protected] Follow on Twitter: @PollsterPatrick COLORADO: TIGHT RACE FOR U.S. SENATE Monmouth University Poll finds incumbent Governor in lead The Monmouth University Poll finds an extremely tight race in the Colorado U.S. Senate contest, with Rep. Cory Gardner holding an insignificant one point lead over first-term incumbent Mark Udall. In the race for Governor, incumbent John Hickenlooper holds a 7 point lead over former Congressman Bob Beauprez who is making his second run for this office. In the election for U.S. Senate, Colorado voters who are likely to cast a ballot next month divide their vote – 47% for Republican challenger Cory Gardner and 46% for Democratic incumbent Mark Udall. Another 4% say they will vote for a different candidate and 3% remain undecided. In the race for Colorado Governor, 50% of likely voters support Democratic incumbent John Hickenlooper and 43% support GOP challenger Bob Beauprez. Another 3% say they will vote for a different candidate and 4% remain undecided. All major party candidates have strong support among their partisan bases. Specifically, 93% of Democrats support Hickenlooper for governor and 92% support Udall for senator, while 85% of Republicans support Beauprez and 86% support Gardner. Independent voters in Colorado have a clearer preference for one office than they do for the other. Independent voters support Hickenlooper over Beauprez by a 53% to 35% margin in the race for governor, but split their vote for senator 43% for Udall and 42% for Gardner.
    [Show full text]