DOCSLIB.ORG

Building a Sustainable National Marine Protected Area Network

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Building a Sustainable National Marine Protected Area Network Annex 1: Bahamas Draft Project Document PROJECT DOCUMENT SECTION 1: PROJECT IDENTIFICATION 1.1 Project title: Building a Sustainable National Marine Protected Area Network – The Bahamas 1.2 Project number: GFL/ PMS: 1.3 Project type: FSP 1.4 Trust Fund: GEF 1.5 Strategic objectives: GEF strategic long-term objective: Biodiversity Strategic programme for GEF IV: BD-SP1, BD-SP2 1.6 UNEP priority: Ecosystem Management 1.7 Geographical scope: Global 1.8 Mode of execution: External 1.9 Project executing organization: Bahamas Environment, Science and Technology Commission (BEST) 1.10 Duration of project: 48 months Commencing: March 2010 Completion: February 2014 1.11 Cost of project US$ % Cost to the GEF Trust Fund 2,200,000 22.1% Co-financing Cash Bahamas 2,000,400 20.1% Environment, Science and Technology (BEST) Commission Department of 400 0.0% Marine Resources Bahamas National 400 0.0% Trust The Nature 2,000,400 20.1% Conservancy KfW 3,000,000 30.1% 1 Annex 1: Bahamas Draft Project Document Sub-total 7,001,600 70.3% In-kind Bahamas 306,000 3.1% Environment, Science and Technology (BEST) Commission Department of 204,000 2.0% Marine Resources Bahamas National 125,000 1.3% Trust The Nature 125,000 1.3% Conservancy Sub Total 760,000 7.7% TOTAL 9,961,600 100% 1.12 Project Summary 1. Key threats to the protected area system of The Bahamas include invasive species, cross- boundary issues/surrounding land, unsustainable exploitation of fishery resources, climate change and tourism and tourism-related conversion and tourism planning processes (e.g., ecologically valuable sites). The greatest deficiency in the system is related to marine protected areas with less than 1% of the country set aside in such areas. The FSP seeks to build a Sustainable National Marine Protected Area Network for The Bahamas and thus enable it to meet its commitments under the CBD PoWPA as well as other obligations under this Convention. Strengths of the project include the component to develop sustainable financing mechanisms for the BNPAS which will benefit the system into perpetuity, not just during the life of the project as well as the demonstration projects which address specific threats to MPAs and have the potential to be replicated for other PA systems globally. The project design also incorporates not only key biodiversity issues, but also climate change and the impact it will have on biodiversity and conservation. 2 Annex 1: Bahamas Draft Project Document TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: PROJECT IDENTIFICATION ............................................................................................... 1 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................... 4 SECTION 2: BACKGROUND AND SITUATION ANALYSIS (BASELINE COURSE OF ACTION) ................ 6 2.1 Background and context............................................................................................................ 6 2.2 Global significance ..................................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Threats, root causes and barrier analysis.............................................................................. 11 2.4 Institutional, sectoral and policy context ............................................................................... 12 2.5 Stakeholder mapping and analysis......................................................................................... 15 2.6 Baseline analysis and gaps....................................................................................................... 17 2.7 Linkages with other GEF and non-GEF interventions ........................................................ 19 SECTION 3: INTERVENTION STRATEGY (ALTERNATIVE) ................................................................. 20 3.1 Project rationale, policy conformity and expected global environmental benefits ............ 20 3.2 Project goal and objective ....................................................................................................... 21 3.3 Project components and expected results .............................................................................. 22 3.4 Intervention logic and key assumptions................................................................................. 35 3.5 Risk analysis and risk management measures ...................................................................... 36 3.6 Consistency with national priorities or plans ........................................................................ 37 3.7 Incremental cost reasoning ..................................................................................................... 38 3.8 Sustainability............................................................................................................................ 41 3.9 Replication................................................................................................................................42 3.10 Public awareness, communications and mainstreaming strategy ..................................... 42 3.11 Environmental and social safeguards................................................................................... 43 SECTION 4: INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK AND IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS.................. 44 SECTION 5: STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION ..................................................................................... 45 SECTION 6: MONITORING AND EVALUATION PLAN.......................................................................... 45 SECTION 7: PROJECT FINANCING AND BUDGET ............................................................................... 47 7.1 Overall project budget............................................................................................................. 47 7.2 Project co-financing ................................................................................................................. 47 7.3 Project cost-effectiveness......................................................................................................... 48 APPENDICES .................................................................................................................................... 49 Appendix 1: Budget by project components and UNEP budget lines................................... 51 Appendix 2: Co-financing by source and UNEP budget lines ............................................... 52 Appendix 3: Incremental cost analysis .................................................................................... 56 Appendix 4: Results Framework.............................................................................................. 63 Appendix 5: Workplan and timetable...................................................................................... 67 Appendix 6: Key deliverables and benchmarks...................................................................... 68 Appendix 7: Costed M&E plan ................................................................................................ 71 Appendix 8: Summary of reporting requirements and responsibilities ............................... 75 Appendix 9: Standard Terminal Evaluation TOR ................................................................. 77 Appendix 10: Decision-making flowchart and organizational chart.................................. 94 Appendix 11: Terms of Reference.......................................................................................... 95 Appendix 12: Co-financing commitment letters from project partners............................. 98 Appendix 13: Endorsement letters of GEF National Focal Points.................................... 108 Appendix 14: Draft procurement plan ................................................................................ 109 Appendix 15 A: METT Baseline ............................................................................................. 111 Appendix 15 B: Financial Sustainability Scorecard.............................................................. 112 3 Annex 1: Bahamas Draft Project Document ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ACS Association of Caribbean States ANCAT Andros Conservancy and Trust AOSIS Alliance of Small Island States BEST Commission Bahamas Environment, Science and Technology Commission BNPAS Bahamas National Protected Area System BNT Bahamas National Trust BPAF Bahamas Protected Areas Fund BREEF Bahamas Reef Environment Educational Foundation BSCA Bahamas Sportfishing and Conservation Association Caricom Caribbean Community CAXP Capacity Action Plan CBD Convention on Biological Diversity CEP Caribbean Environment Programme CITES Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora CLME Caribbean Large Marine Ecosystem COB College of The Bahamas COP-7 Seventh Conference of The Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity CTO Caribbean Tourism Organization DMR Department of Marine Resources EAG Early Action Grant ECLSP Exuma Cays Land and Sea Park FMO Financial Management Officer FOE Friends of the Environment EOU Evaluation and Oversight Unit FSP Full-Sized Project GCRMN Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network GEF Global Environment Facility GIS Geographic Information Systems GLISPA Global Island Partnership GloBallast International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments GOB Government of The Bahamas IA Implementing Agency IAS Invasive Alien Species ICAO International Civil Aviation Organization IMO International
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Our History - Bahamas National Trust Page 1 of 6
    Our History - Bahamas National Trust Page 1 of 6 (http://bnt.bs)ABOUT JOIN US NEWS PARKS EDUCATION SCIENCE RESOURCES CONTACT X DONATE Search OUR HISTORY Home (http://bnt.bs) / About Us (http://bnt.bs/about-us/) / Our History The efforts of two groups of conservationists, each pursuing separate goals, brought about the historic legislation that created the Bahamas National Trust in 1959. West Indian Flamingos Historically, the extensive mangrove wetlands of the Bahama Islands had been home to large flocks of West Indian Flamingos. In the 1700s, Mark Catesby produced the first illustrations of scarlet-coloured wading birds for his famous Natural History of Carolina, Florida and the Bahama Islands. But by the early years of the 20th century, concern for the survival of the West Indian Flamingo was rising. In 1905, the National Audubon Society in the United States urged The Bahamas government to take action, which led to passage of the Wild Birds (Protection) Act. http://bnt.bs/about-us/our-history/ 11/19/2017 Our History - Bahamas National Trust Page 2 of 6 In 1950, the Audubon Society sent its then Director of Research, Robert Porter Allen, to the island of Inagua to investigate what could be done to halt the flamingo’s slide to extinction. By then, the isolated back-waters of Lake Rosa on Inagua were home to the largest surviving group of West Indian Flamingos. Allen devoted three years to this field study, and with Bahamians Arthur Vernay and Elgin Forsythe, he formed a Society for the Protection of Flamingos in 1951. Two brothers on Inagua – Samuel and James Nixon – were hired as wardens.
    [Show full text]
  • BAHAMAS NATIONAL TRUST Strategic Plan 2013-2017
    BAHAMAS NATIONAL TRUST Strategic Plan 2013-2017 Strategic cover.indd 1 4/11/13 2:04 PM Te Bahamas National Trust STRATEGIC PLAN 2013-2017 Managing National Parks Preserving Our Future 2 Bahamas National Trust STRATEGIC PLAN 2013-2017 3 Te lating pleaure of contact with the natural world are not reerved for scientits but are available to anyone who will place himself under the infuence of earth, sea and sky and their amaing life. —Rachael Carson, Silent Spring 4 Vision, Mission & Values Vision: A comprehensive system of national parks and protected areas, with every Bahamian embracing environmental stewardship Mission: To conserve and protect the natural resources of Te Bahamas, through stewardship and education for present and future generations Values: J'/AA7=<4=@B633<D7@=<;3<B/<2B631=<A3@D/B7=<=4=C@</BC@/:@3A=C@13A J2C1/B7=</A/93GB=:=<5B3@;1=<A3@D/B7=<AC113AA J=;;7B;3<BB=03AB>@/1B713A7<>@=B31B32/@3/;/</53;3<B J)3A>31B4=@=B63@A/A23;=<AB@/B32B6@=C56B3/;E=@9/<2>/@B<3@A67>A J <B35@7BGB@/<A>/@3<1G/<2/11=C<B/07:7BG J(C/:7BG1=<A7AB3<B/<2@3:7/0:3A3@D713B==C@1=<AB7BC3<BA Bahamas National Trust STRATEGIC PLAN 2013-2017 5 6 Introduction For more than half a century, Te Bahamas National Trust has protected and managed designated land and sea areas of natural or historic interest for the beneft of Bahamians. < B63%+A5=D3@<7<5:357A:/B7=<E/A@3D7A32B=4=@;/:7A3B63=@ 5/<7A/B7=<A@=:3/A/<=N17/:/2D7A=@B=5=D3@<;3<B/<2B63>@7D/B3A31B=@ on development, biodiversity, and heritage issues and policies.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Annual Report
    2011 ANNUAL REPORT Bahamas National Trust 39 March 2011 – March 2012 BNT OFFICERS Neil McKinney, President John F. Bethell, Deputy President Lawrence Glinton, Honourary Secretary Peter Stokes, Honourary Treasurer MEMBERS OF COUNCIL Glenn Bannister Elected Member Shirley Cartwright Elected Member Barbara Thompson Elected Member Pericles Maillis Elected Member D. Stewart Morrison Elected Member Andy Fowler Elected Member Teresa Butler Governor General’s Representative Nakira Wilchcombe Governor General’s Representative Michael Braynen Ministry of Agriculture and Marine Resources Earlston McPhee Ministry of Tourism Christopher Russell Ministry of the Environment Patricia Collins Ministry of Education Dan Brumbaugh,PhD American Museum of Natural History Nancy Clum,PhD Wildlife Conservation Society Matt Jefferey National Audubon Society Valerie Paul, PhD Smithsonian Institution Pamela Reid, PhD University of Miami Mark Lewis US Parks Service SCIENTIFIC ADVISORS Karen Bjorndal, PhD, Scientific Advisor , University of Florida Alan Bolten, PhD, Scientific Advisor, University of Florida Bahamas National Trust 1 PRESIDENT’s MessAGE The Bahamas National Trust continues to make tre- mendous strides in improving the infrastructure and management of the national parks. Work has contin- ued at the Primeval Forest with the final Phase in pro- gress for this jewel of a park. In Andros our park war- dens in partnership with students from the University of Maryland have worked in the Blue Hole National Park to create firewalls and build benches and tables for visitors. The BNT has recently completed a conceptual plan for the Abaco National Park and will be conducting com- munity consultation to introduce the plan and receive feedback on our proposed infrastructure at this very im- portant park.
    [Show full text]
  • PINE FOREST , Asbushy Alsoknown Beard Grass, and Plants
    PINE FOREST SCIENTIFIC NAMES The Caribbean Pine (Pinus caribaea var. bahamensis) also known as Yellow Pine. Other fl ora which can be found in the Bahamian Pine forest are Bletia purpurea, Pineyard Pink Orchid, Andorpogon glomeratus, also known as Bushy Beard Grass, and Pteridium aquilinum, Southern Bracken Fern. Shrubs which populate the area are Wild guava (Tetrazygia bicolor), Five-fi nger or Chicken's foot (Tabebuia bahamense), and Snowberry (Chiococca the alba). The Scale leafed love vine (Cassytha fi liformis) winds its way through understory and around Poisonwood (Metopium toxiferum). The Sabal palmetto (Cocothrinax argenta) may dominate ground fl ora in certain pine forest areas. DESCRIPTION Fire Climax Community The Caribbean Pine is a light-demanding species that requires open areas with no competition from shading broad-leafed plants. Caribbean pinelands are called "fi re Ecosystems of The Bahamas climax communities" by botanists, for if periodic fi res do not occur to remove the shading broad-leafed understory, juvenile pines cannot get suffi cient light to take hold and replace the adult trees as they die off. Without fi res the pinelands would be succeeded by the broad leafed coppice, a hardwood forest. Extremely well adapted to fi re, the Caribbean Pine adults are rarely killed by the fl ames. Their fi re resistance is due to volatile resins in the bark which explode when heated, putting out any small fi res which start at the bark. Juvenile pines are not as resistant as the adults and are generally killed, but reseeding takes place around the base of the adult trees rapidly.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Protected Areas Management Guidance Document
    Bahamas Protected Photo by Shane Gross Marine Protected Area Management Guidance Document A Guide for Policy-Makers & Protected Area Managers SEATHEFUTURE September 2018 Prepared by the Bahamas National Trust Marine Protected Area Management Guidance Document | September 2018 A Companion Document to the Marine Protection Plan for expanding The Bahamas Marine Protected Areas Network to meet The Bahamas 2020 declaration (September 2018) Prepared by Global Parks & the Bahamas National Trust with support from The Nature Conservancy Bahamas Protected is a three-year initiative to effectively manage and expand the Bahamian marine protected areas (MPA) network. It aims to support the Government of The Bahamas in meeting its commitment to the Caribbean Challenge Initiative (CCI); a regional agenda where 11 Caribbean countries have committed to protect 20 percent of their marine and coastal habitat by 2020. CCI countries have also pledged to provide sustainable financing for effective management of MPAs. Bahamas Protected is a joint effort between The Nature Conservancy, the Bahamas National Trust, the Bahamas Reef Environment Educational Foundation and multiple national stakeholders, with major funding support from Oceans 5. For further information, please contact: Bahamas National Trust, P.O. Box N-4105, Nassau, N.P., The Bahamas. Phone: (242) 393-1317, Fax: (242) 393-4878, Email: [email protected] 1 Marine Protected Area Management Guidance Document | September 2018 Contents I. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Bahamas Experience
    Case Study Marine Protected Areas Assigning IUCN Protected Area Management Categories – The Bahamas Experience “The process of assigning management categories to our national parks will help facilitate the planning of protected areas and protected area systems managed by BNT and other agencies, improve information management about protected areas and assist to regulate activities within protected areas.” Eric Carey, Executive Director, Bahamas National Trust1 Participants at the BIOPAMA-facilitated workshops Summary Credit: Lynn Gape, BNT At its first meeting, the Commonwealth Blue Charter has produced detailed guidance on the categories but Marine Protected Area (MPA) Action Group identified there are few documented examples of the assignment training on the International Union for Conservation of process. Nature (IUCN) protected area management categories As part of the process to improve the management as one of its capacity development needs. Each and expansion of The Bahamas MPA network, the protected area should be assigned to one of these Bahamas National Trust (BNT), with the Department categories, and governments should provide information of Marine Resources (DMR) and the Clifton Heritage on categories when submitting data on protected Authority, undertook a process to assign IUCN areas to the World Database of Protected Areas. IUCN protected area management categories to all sites under its purview, through a series of workshops in 2014. 1 https://www.biopama.org/news/bahamas-moves-to-assign- protected-areas-management-categories52 Protected areas of The Bahamas (as of 2015) Credit: Lindy Knowles, BNT Recommendations for categories for all designated Assigning categories can be difficult if there are multiple protected areas, including MPAs, were made.
    [Show full text]
  • National Parks • Preserving Our Future
    Managing National Parks • Preserving Our Future Cost of Managing National Parks Presenter: Catherine Pinder Director of Finance and Operations, Bahamas National Trust Overview! • Issues faced by our Nation and the role of the Bahamas National Trust • Resource protection cost and challenges • BNT sustainable funding mechanisms • The funding gap Issues faced by our nation and the role of the Bahamas National Trust • Competition for government funds – high crime, high unemployment, high health care costs, educational concerns • The Exuma Land and Sea Park formed in 1958 • The Bahamas National Trust formed in 1959 ➢ Bahamas National Trust ACT ➢ Charged with creating and managing the national parks ➢ Advisor to the government THE GAP Our cost verification report commissioned by the IDB in September 2016 and updated by The BNT in March 2018, shows funding needs for optimal performance as follows: Staffing Annual Investment Description Needs Operating Costs Needs Existing parks 211 $10,526,820 27,662,899 New and park expansions 18 1,370,672 3,711,200 Total at optimal performance 229 11,897,492 31,374,099 Historical operating budgets 60 $4,300,000 OPERATIONAL GAP 169 $7,597,492 BENEFITS OF AN OPTIMAL NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM: increased ecological assessments to identify and advocate for the increase in staff and designation of areas that should be protected; increased evaluations Science Resource protection larger travel budget to determine the effectiveness of our programs and expanded habitat restoration program increase in staff, increased enforcement,
    [Show full text]
  • The Bahamas Protected Area Network Management Effectiveness Evaluation Workshop Report
    The Bahamas Protected Area Network Management Effectiveness Evaluation Workshop July 22 – 24, 2014 Paradise Island, Bahamas Report submitted by: Table of Contents I. Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................1 II. Background ................................................................................................................................4 III. Conceptual Approach ...............................................................................................................5 IV. Workshop Implementation......................................................................................................6 V. Comparative Analysis (2009 – 2014).........................................................................................9 Protected Area Context.............................................................................................................9 Ecological and Socioeconomic Importance ................................................................................9 Vulnerability .............................................................................................................................12 Landscape/Seascape Planning and Protected Area Benefits ...................................................16 Pressures and Threats ..............................................................................................................18 Protected Area Planning, Inputs, Processes and Outputs ......................................................29
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Protected Areas Proposal
    Bahamas Protected Marine Protection Plan for expanding The Bahamas Marine Protected Areas Network to meet The Bahamas 2020 declaration SEATHEFUTURE September 2018 20 by 20 White Paper Prepared by The Bahamas National Trust 20 by 20 White Paper : Marine Protection Plan | 1 A Proposal Prepared for the Office of the Prime Minister, Ministry of Environment and Housing and the Ministry of Agriculture and Marine Resources Prepared by the Bahamas Protected 20 by 20 White Paper Working Team: Lakeshia Anderson1, Craig Dahlgren2, Lindy Knowles1, Lashanti Jupp1, Shelley Cant-Woodside1, Shenique Albury-Smith3, Casuarina McKinney-Lambert4, Agnessa Lundy1 Bahamas National Trust1 Perry Institute for Marine Science2 The Nature Conservancy3 Bahamas Reef Environment Educational Foundation4 20 by 20 White Paper : Marine Protection Plan | 2 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................................................... 13 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 14 THE BAHAMAS: A LEADER IN MARINE CONSERVATION ..................................................................... 15 BAHAMAS PROTECTED PROJECT ......................................................................................................... 16 BACKGROUND INFORMATION .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • East Abaco Creeks National Park Proposal
    East Abaco Creeks National Park Abaco, Bahamas A Proposal to protect a network of mangrove wetlands in The East Abaco Creeks. Prepared at the Request of the Bahamas National Trust By: Friends of the Environment Abaco, Bahamas 2009 Patterson, O. and K. Williams. (2009) Friends of the Environment. East Abaco Creeks National Park: A Proposal to protect a network of mangrove wetlands in the East Abaco Creeks. February 17, 2009. This document can not be cited without the authors’ permission. Contact: Olivia Patterson, Friends of the Environment, Marsh Harbour, Abaco. 242-367-2721, [email protected] ii Table of Contents Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………….1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………….3 Location…………………………………………………………………………...3 Boundaries and Buffer Zones……………………………………………………..4 Importance of Mangrove Ecosystems...…………………………………………..7 The Blue Hole System of East Abaco Wetlands………………………………...10 Proposal Development….………………………………………………………………..12 Community Consultation………………………………………………………...12 Private Land Owners……………………………………………………………..15 Creek Usage……………………………………………………………………...15 The Bahamas National Parks System…………………………………………………... 20 Justification for Proposed Area..…………………………………………………………20 Existing Threats……..…………………………………………………………...20 Park Management………………………………………………………………………..22 Financial Sustainability…………………………………………………………..22 Enforcement……………………………………………………………………...23 Education and Awareness………………………………………………………..24 Zoning……………………………………………………………………………24 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………….26
    [Show full text]
  • Bahamas Protected Marine Protection Plan
    Bahamas Protected Marine Protection Plan for expanding The Bahamas Marine Protected Areas Network to meet The Bahamas 2020 declaration SEATHEFUTURE September 2018 20 by 20 White Paper Prepared by The Bahamas National Trust 20 by 20 White Paper : Marine Protection Plan | 1 A Proposal Prepared for the Office of the Prime Minister, Ministry of Environment and Housing and the Ministry of Agriculture and Marine Resources Prepared by the Bahamas Protected 20 by 20 White Paper Working Team: Lakeshia Anderson1, Craig Dahlgren2, Lindy Knowles1, Lashanti Jupp1, Shelley Cant-Woodside1, Shenique Albury-Smith3, Casuarina McKinney-Lambert4, Agnessa Lundy1 Bahamas National Trust1 Perry Institute for Marine Science2 The Nature Conservancy3 Bahamas Reef Environment Educational Foundation4 20 by 20 White Paper : Marine Protection Plan | 2 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................................................... 13 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 14 THE BAHAMAS: A LEADER IN MARINE CONSERVATION ..................................................................... 15 BAHAMAS PROTECTED PROJECT ......................................................................................................... 16 BACKGROUND INFORMATION .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bahamas Plan
    PROTECTED AREAS MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FOR BAHAMIAN TERRESTRIAL VERTEBRATES: IGUANAS AND SEABIRDS Bahamian Field Station San Salvador, The Bahamas 11-12 November, 2000 Organized by Conservation Unit, Bahamas Department of Agriculture and IUCN/SSC Iguana Specialist Group In collaboration with IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group Supported by Fort Worth Zoo Zoological Society of San Diego 1 A contribution of the IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group. Organized by Conservation Unit, Bahamas Department of Agriculture and the IUCN/SSC Iguana Specialist Group, in collaboration with the IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group. Supported by the Fort Worth Zoo and the Zoological Society of San Diego. © Copyright 2001 by CBSG. Citation: E. Carey, S.D. Buckner, A.C. Alberts, R.D. Hudson, and D. Lee, editors. 2001. Protected Areas Management Strategy for Bahamian Terrestrial Vertebrates: Iguanas and Seabirds. IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, Apple Valley, Minnesota. Additional copies of Protected Areas Management Strategy for Bahamian Terrestrial Vertebrates: Iguanas and Seabirds Report can be ordered through the IUCN/SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, 12101 Johnny Cake Ridge Road, Apple Valley, MN 55124. 2 Bartsch’s iguana, Cyclura carinata bartschi Andros island iguana, Cyclura cychlura cychlura Exuma island iguana, Cyclura cychlura figginsi Allen’s Cay iguana, Cyclura cychlura inornata Allen’s Cay iguana, Cyclura cychlura inornata Acklins iguana, Cyclura rileyi nuchalis San Salvador iguana, Cyclura rileyi rileyi San Salvador iguana, Cyclura rileyi rileyi 3 Audubon’s Shearwater, Puffinus lherminieri Least Tern, Sterna antillarum White-tailed Tropicbird, Phaethon lepturus Brown Booby, Sula leucogaster Bridled Tern, Sterna anaethetus Magnificent Frigatebird, Fregata magnificens - Juveniles 4 CONTENTS Opening Remarks by The Bahamas Minister of Commerce, Agriculture, and Industry ..........................
    [Show full text]