Hemagglutinin Receptor Binding Activity of Influenza Class II
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Exosome-Driven Antigen Transfer for MHC Class II Presentation Facilitated by the Receptor Binding Activity of Influenza Hemagglutinin This information is current as of September 25, 2021. James S. Testa, Geraud S. Apcher, Joseph D. Comber and Laurence C. Eisenlohr J Immunol 2010; 185:6608-6616; Prepublished online 3 November 2010; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001768 Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/content/185/11/6608 Supplementary http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2011/05/31/jimmunol.100176 http://www.jimmunol.org/ Material 8.DC1 References This article cites 79 articles, 29 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/185/11/6608.full#ref-list-1 Why The JI? Submit online. • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision by guest on September 25, 2021 • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. The Journal of Immunology Exosome-Driven Antigen Transfer for MHC Class II Presentation Facilitated by the Receptor Binding Activity of Influenza Hemagglutinin James S. Testa,1 Geraud S. Apcher,2 Joseph D. Comber, and Laurence C. Eisenlohr The mechanisms underlying MHC class I-restricted cross-presentation, the transfer of Ag from an infected cell to a professional APC, have been studied in great detail. Much less is known about the equivalent process for MHC class II-restricted presentation. After infection or transfection of class II-negative donor cells, we observed minimal transfer of a proteasome-dependent “class I- like” epitope within the influenza neuraminidase glycoprotein but potent transfer of a classical, H-2M–dependent epitope within the hemagglutinin (HA) glycoprotein. Additional experiments determined transfer to be exosome-mediated and substantially enhanced by the receptor binding activity of incorporated HA. Furthermore, a carrier effect was observed in that incorporated Downloaded from HA improved exosome-mediated transfer of a second membrane protein. This route of Ag presentation should be relevant to other enveloped viruses, may skew CD4+ responses toward exosome-incorporated glycoproteins, and points toward novel vaccine strategies. The Journal of Immunology, 2010, 185: 6608–6616. D4+ T lymphocytes are activated through the recogni- The dichotomy of exogenous Ag for MHC II and endogenous tion of Ag-derived peptides complexed to MHC class II Ag for MHC I (4) is becoming increasingly indistinct. For ex- http://www.jimmunol.org/ C (MHC II) molecules. Conventionally, Ag is acquired ample, there are now numerous examples of MHC II-restricted through uptake of exogenous material in the form of whole or peptides that are generated from endogenous sources of Ag (5–7), partial pathogens, soluble proteins, or cellular fragments from and several processing mechanisms have been reported including necrotic or apoptotic cells (1). Internalized Ags are then unfolded macroautophagy (8), chaperone-mediated autophagy (9), and a class and digested within the endosomal network by resident reductases I-like proteasome/TAP-dependent pathway (10). The NA79 epi- and proteases. Once sufficiently disordered, epitopes are loaded tope (aa 79–93), derived from the influenza neuraminidase (NA) onto MHC II molecules in a late endosomal compartment with the andalsoH-2–IEd restricted, is generated via this last pathway assistance of the chaperone H-2M. The H-2–IEd-restricted site 1 (10). A major exception to the conventional class I pathway is the (S1) epitope aa 107–119 of the A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (PR8) in- phenomenon of cross-presentation in which Ag is transferred from by guest on September 25, 2021 fluenza hemagglutinin (HA) is generated in this manner (2, 3). infected cells to professional APCs, primarily dendritic cells (DCs). The conventional pathway for generation of MHC class I (MHC This route appears to be critical for naive T cell activation in cases I)-restricted epitopes is distinctly different in requiring delivery where the professional APC cannot directly acquire Ag (11). of Ag to the cytosol, digestion by the proteasome, and transport of Additionally, it allows for escape from immunosuppressive effects resultant peptides to the endoplasmic reticulum via TAP for load- imposed by the pathogen in the infected cell (12). Conventionally, ing onto nascent MHC I molecules. cross-presented material is delivered to the cytosol for proteasome/ TAP-dependent processing (13, 14), but there are also reports in which cross-presented Ag is confined to a phagolysosomal com- partment where it is processed and loaded onto resident MHC I Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Kimmel Cancer Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107 molecules, a decidedly MHC II-like scenario (13, 15). 1Current address: Immunotope Inc., Pennsylvania Biotechnology Center, Doyles- A priori, there is no reason why Ag transfer would be restricted town, PA. to MHC I. Limited study of class II-restricted transfer may be due 2Current address: Target Therapeutics, INSERM U940, Institute of Molecular Ge- to the general view that class II processing is limited to the en- netics, University of Paris 7, Hospital St. Louis, Paris, France. dosomal compartment after uptake of exogenous Ag. Thus, Ag Received for publication May 27, 2010. Accepted for publication September 30, transfer would not be much different from direct acquisition. How- 2010. ever, given the aforementioned endogenous MHC II presentation This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant AI39501. pathways, there is ample reason for exploring cross-presentation Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Laurence C. Eisenlohr, Thomas within the class II system. Whereas several studies have sug- Jefferson University, BLSB Room 730, 233 South 10th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107. E-mail address: [email protected] gested that class II-restricted Ag transfer is limited (16–22), others The online version of this article contains supplemental material. have described transfer of soluble proteins, apoptotic bodies, pre- processed peptides, and exosomes as being viable mechanisms (1, Abbreviations used in this paper: CQ, chloroquine; DC, dendritic cell; HA, hemag- glutinin; HAU, hemagglutinating unit; iPR8, infectious PR8; MHC I, MHC class I; 23–30). With the goal of better understanding the parameters of MHC II, MHC class II; MUG, b-galactosidase substrate methyl-umbelliferyl-b-D- class II-restricted Ag transfer, we tested the widely disparate S1 and galactoside; MVB, multivesicular body; NA, neuraminidase; NA79, neuraminidase aa 79–93 epitope; PR8, influenza A/Puerto Rico/8/34; Rv6, Rv6 variant of PR8 HA; NA79 epitopes in this setting. Given the relative efficiency of class S1, site 1; S1–Tac, S1 appended on the N terminus of Tac; SS, signal sequence; TEM, I-restricted cross-presentation, our expectation was that NA79 transmission electron microscopy; TM, transmembrane domain; UVPR8, UV- would be transferred whereas the classically presented S1 epitope inactivated PR8; WT, wild-type. would not. Instead, results were the opposite, revealing a mecha- Copyright Ó 2010 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. 0022-1767/10/$16.00 nism for efficient Ag transfer of classically presented epitopes. www.jimmunol.org/cgi/doi/10.4049/jimmunol.1001768 The Journal of Immunology 6609 Materials and Methods 200 mU NA (Sigma) to remove terminal sialic acid residues 2 h before the Mice addition of B6-HA donor cells. To evaluate the degree of anti-HA–mediated neutralization and NA-mediated de-sialation, treated B6IEd cells were All mice used were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, infected with PR8, and NA79 presentation was determined. ME) and maintained by the Thomas Jefferson University Office of Labo- ratory Animal Services (Philadelphia, PA). All experimental protocols were Exosome purification preapproved by the Thomas Jefferson University Institutional Animal Care Exosomes were purified from 4-d- or 16-h-old supernatants of appropriate and Use Committee. cells according to standard protocol (34). Briefly, supernatant was first Synthetic peptides centrifuged at 10,000 3 g for 30 min to clear cells and cell debris. Sub- sequently, it was ultracentrifuged at 100,000 3 g to generate an exosome Synthetic S1 (HA 107–119), NA79 (NA 79–93), and SIINFEKL (OVA257– pellet, which was then washed with PBS and re-pelleted at 100,000 3 g. 264) peptides were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Peptides Pellets were then floated on a continuous 5–65% sucrose gradient by ultra- were pulsed onto APCs at 1025 M. centrifugation at 24,000 rpm in a Beckman-Coulter (Brea, CA) SW41TI rotor (∼76,000 3 g) overnight. The following day, the gradient fractions were Cell lines, transfection, and recombinant retroviral analyzed for exosome content, and exosome-containing fractions were di- transduction alyzed against PBS prior to storage at 4˚C. Cell lines described in this study were primary skin fibroblasts derived from Coupling of exosomes to latex beads C57B6 or H-2M2/2 C57B6, which were then transduced with appropriate retroviruses. All lines were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% Exosomes were prepared for analysis by flow cytometry as previously de- FCS and 0.05 mM 2-ME. scribed (35). Briefly, purified exosomes were adsorbed to 0.4-mm-diameter The retrovirus construct used was MSCV–CMVor MSCV–CMV–IRES– aldehyde/sulfate latex beads (Invitrogen) for 15 min at room temperature. GFP with pCL–Ampho or pCL–Eco as the helper plasmid (generous gifts Next, the bead/exosome mixture was diluted with 1 ml PBS and incubated Downloaded from from Dr.