DOCSLIB.ORG

Goldwater Institute Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Goldwater Institute Annual Report Goldwater2009 Institute Annual Report Goldwater Institute 500 East Coronado Road Phoenix, Arizona 85004 T 602.462.5000 F 602.256.7045 [email protected] www.goldwaterinstitute.org may well be remembered as the year when the sound of freedom began 2009 to echo more vibrantly in town halls and capitol buildings across America. In the face of persistent economic hardship and major threats to freedom emanating from message from Washington, hundreds of thousands of Americans stood together against the growth of the president and government power and called for a return to liberty. In Arizona, freedom advanced on the chairman several important fronts. An Arizona ballot proposal to use state constitutions to block federal healthcare that took root at the Goldwater Legislative measures to expand school choice (page 9), Institute has now spread to more than 30 other states improve government transparency (page 20), and more (see page 3). A second proposal to curb union power and efficiently provide transportation infrastructure (page 19) protect workers is also headed for the ballot (page 3). also helped to strengthen freedom. Freedom also advanced in court. U.S. District Court The Goldwater Institute is proud to be leading these judge Roslyn Silver agreed with the Goldwater Institute efforts. The Institute was honored in 2009 to again that Arizona’s Clean Elections system “is not supported be recognized by the Arizona Capitol Times as the Best by a compelling interest, is not narrowly tailored, and Capitol Watchdog. We are thankful to columnist George is not the least restrictive alternative. The Act is Will, who called the Institute “America’s most potent unconstitutional under the First Amendment” (page 4). advocate of limited government.” In Tucson, judge Paul Tang ruled favorably in our These successes could not have come without the case against regulatory takings of private property, commitment and generosity of our donors, who continue declaring “the Court believes that the public’s interest to make this work possible even through difficult economic Darcy Olsen Thomas C. Patterson in laws requiring compensation for partial regulatory times. We recognize that Americans still face a host of PRESIDENT AND CEO CHAIRMAN takings is significant and arguably compelling” (page 14). challenges and threats to freedom at both the state and The ruling means that Tucson will likely have to compen- federal levels, and that it will require a tremendous sate builder Mike Goodman, who builds and refurbishes effort to turn the tide of government growth. But we student housing, for regulations that impeded his are grateful for the significant advances freedom made projects. The case does much to uphold property rights in 2009, and are optimistic that these victories will and Proposition 207, which requires government to pave the way to a brighter, freer future. The Goldwater compensate property owners when they pass laws or Institute will remain steadfast in its commitment to regulations that diminish property values. the principles of economic liberty, educational freedom, In a victory for economic freedom, a superior court and limited government. judge ruled that the city of Tempe did not have the right to revoke the business permit of Tom and Elizabeth Preston, who were initially given the go-ahead to open a tattoo studio (page 11). In a similar lawsuit, the Goldwater Institute is defending the right of Gilbert Darcy Olsen small business owner Cindy Vong to continue offering her PRESIDENT & CEO fish foot treatment against the state cosmetology board’s attempts to shut her down (page 11). If successful, the case will help protect entrepreneurs against arbitrary and burdensome regulations. Thomas C. Patterson CHAIRMAN 1 standing up for states tates can stand up to the federal government, and two SGoldwater Institute proposals are showing how. As the federal government attempts to gain more control over Americans’ Arizona doctors gather at the state capitol. Polls show 65 percent health care, a proposal crafted by Dr. Eric Novack and the Goldwater Institute of doctors oppose the federal government’s proposed health care would protect health care freedom by prohibiting government from forcing expansion. A proposal crafted with the help of the Goldwater Institute { would protect doctors’ and patients’ rights against a federal takeover. people to participate in health care systems and guaranteeing the right to directly purchase lawful medical services. As the New York Times recently wrote, “The idea of amending state constitutions to block the core of the federal health care legislation, including the requirement that individuals and businesses buy insurance, began at the conservative Goldwater Institute in Arizona, the state where the first such measure will appear on the ballot next year.” Arizona’s ballot measure is already serving as a model in 32 other states that have recently proposed similar measures. A second proposal that would defend the state against federal overreach is the Save Our Secret Ballot referendum, an idea drafted at the Goldwater Institute. The ballot measure would help forestall the federal “card check” bill moving through Congress, which would eliminate the right of workers to have secret ballots in elections to determine whether workplaces are unionized. Taking anonymity out of the process would enable unions and employers to pressure individual workers in unionization votes. If voters approve the Save Our Secret Ballot referendum, the act will amend the state constitution to protect workers’ right to a secret ballot. It is well established that the federal constitution sets the baseline for the protection of our liberties, and that state constitutions are free to offer more protection of those liberties. All state constitutions do exactly that, containing protections of individual rights and structural restraints on government unknown to the national constitution. These two proposals, if approved by voters, would defend the states against growing national government power and encourage the use of state constitutions to protect some of our most fundamental liberties. 2 3 freeing speech ree elections and free speech are at the heart of free Fsocieties. Arizona’s Clean Elections system, however, threatens both. Clean Elections offers taxpayer campaign financing to candidates for statewide and legislative office. Funding levels are determined in part by the program’s “matching funds” provision, which gives publicly financed candidates additional money to match whatever their privately funded opponents spend. That makes privately financed candidates hesitant to spend money and gives public candidates the advantage of not having to pay for fundraising. The Goldwater Institute filed a lawsuit, McComish v. Bennett, to challenge the matching funds provision based on a precedent from the June 2008 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Davis v. FEC. That case held that the goal of “leveling” electoral opportunities does not justify a campaign finance system in which “the vigorous exercise of the right to use personal funds to finance campaign speech produces fundraising advantages for opponents in the competitive context of electoral politics.” In her ruling in McComish v. Bennett, judge Roslyn Silver wrote, “The [Clean Elections] Act, in its current form, is not supported by a compelling interest, is not narrowly tailored, and is not the least restrictive alternative. The Act is unconstitutional under the First Amendment.” The Goldwater Institute expects matching funds to be eliminated by 2011. The ruling enhances First Amendment rights in Arizona, and is in keeping with the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. FEC that overturned numerous campaign finance restrictions. Goldwater Institute constitutional government director Nick Dranias stands outside the downtown Phoenix The Goldwater Institute filed an amicus brief in the Citizens United federal courthouse where he successfully argued that case, arguing that citizens should be free to hear all arguments at all { Arizona’s Clean Elections system violates free speech. times during elections. 4 5 defending taxpayers acing a $14 million budget shortfall, Gilbert, FArizona found itself, like cities across the nation, with difficult budget decisions to make. And, as in many other cities, Gilbert officials proposed raising taxes to cover the budget gap, ultimately approving three measures to raise various sales and use taxes. But Gilbert citizens fought back. A hastily organized group of citizens launched referendum drives to put the tax increases to a vote. But when they went to register their committees and get petitions, the town clerk told them their efforts were a waste of time, according to Kevin Ross, who chaired the citizens’ committees. Town officials claimed the tax measures were not referrable. But within 30 days citizens turned in roughly 2,500 signatures for each of the three referendum issues, far more than needed to force the issues to the ballot. They also contacted the Goldwater Institute to help battle the town’s claim that the issues were not referrable. Goldwater Institute attorney Carrie Ann Sitren looked into the town’s claim and found that the law is clear – tax issues can be referred to voters. At a town hall meeting, Sitren warned the council that any attempt to block the referendum would subject the town to a legal challenge from the Goldwater Institute. The council finally backed down and repealed all three tax measures. Goldwater Institute attorney Carrie Ann Sitren Gilbert resident David Molina wrote, “Thanks to you, it turned out stands outside Gilbert Town Hall, where she successfully defended the right of citizens to to be a great day for Gilbert’s taxpayers!…Without your…eloquent { refer tax increases to the ballot. and resolute participation in the council meeting last night, the council would not have given effect to the will of the people.” 6 7 Ciana Cunningham and her son, Keon Gregory, at the New Millenium Worldwide Academy, a private school in South Phoenix that Keon attends thanks educational opportunity { to a tuition tax credit scholarship.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Books, Documents, Speeches & Films to Read Or
    Books, Documents, Speeches & Films to Read or See Roger Ream, Fund for American Studies Email: [email protected], Website: www.tfas.org Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FB0EhPM_M4 American documents & speeches: Declaration of Independence The Constitution Federalist Papers The Anti-Federalist Washington’s Farewell Address Jefferson 2nd Inaugural Address Gettysburg Address Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death speech of Patrick Henry Ronald Reagan’s Time for Choosing speech (1964) Barry Goldwater’s Acceptance Speech to the 1964 Republican Convention First Principles The Law, Frederic Bastiat A Conflict of Visions, Thomas Sowell Libertarianism: A Reader, David Boaz Libertarianism: A Primer, David Boaz Liberty & Tyranny, Mark Levin Anarchy, State and Utopia, Robert Nozick The Constitution of Liberty, F.A. Hayek Conscience of a Conservative, Barry Goldwater What It Means to Be a Libertarian, Charles Murray Capitalism and Freedom, Milton Friedman Free Market Economics Economics in One Lesson, Henry Hazlitt Eat the Rich, P.J. O’Rourke Common Sense Economics: What Everyone Should Know about Wealth & Prosperity: James Gwartney, Richard Stroup and Dwight Lee Free to Choose, Milton Friedman Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith Capitalism, Socialism & Democracy, Joseph Schumpeter Basic Economics: A Citizen’s Guide to the Economy, Thomas Sowell Human Action, Ludwig von Mises Principles of Economics, Carl Menger Myths of Rich and Poor, W. Michael Cox and Richard Alm The Economic Way of Thinking, 10th edition, Paul Heyne, Peter J. Boettke, David L. Prychitko Give Me a Break: How I Exposed Hucksters, Cheats and Scam Artists and Became the Scourge of the Liberal Media…, John Stossel Other books of importance: The Road to Serfdom, F.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Insider's Guidetoazpolitics
    olitics e to AZ P Insider’s Guid Political lists ARIZONA NEWS SERVICE ARIZONA CAPITOL TIMES • Arizona Capitol Reports FEATURING PROFILES of Arizona’s legislative & congressional districts, consultants & public policy advocates Statistical Trends The chicken Or the egg? WE’RE EXPERTS AT GETTING POLICY MAKERS TO SEE YOUR SIDE OF THE ISSUE. R&R Partners has a proven track record of using the combined power of lobbying, public relations and advertising experience to change both minds and policy. The political environment is dynamic and it takes a comprehensive approach to reach the right audience at the right time. With more than 50 years of combined experience, we’ve been helping our clients win, regardless of the political landscape. Find out what we can do for you. Call Jim Norton at 602-263-0086 or visit us at www.rrpartners.com. JIM NORTON JEFF GRAY KELSEY LUNDY STUART LUTHER 101 N. FIRST AVE., STE. 2900 Government & Deputy Director Deputy Director Government & Phoenix, AZ 85003 Public Affairs of Client Services of Client Public Affairs Director Development Associate CONTENTS Politics e to AZ ARIZONA NEWS SERVICE Insider’s Guid Political lists STAFF CONTACTS 04 ARIZONA NEWS SERVICE BEATING THE POLITICAL LEGISLATIVE Administration ODDS CONSULTANTS, DISTRICT Vice President & Publisher: ARIZONA CAPITOL TIMES • Arizona Capitol Reports Ginger L. Lamb Arizonans show PUBLIC POLICY PROFILES Business Manager: FEATURING PROFILES of Arizona’s legislative & congressional districts, consultants & public policy advocates they have ‘the juice’ ADVOCATES,
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting the Urban-Rural Relationship in Arizona
    Revisiting the Urban-Rural Relationship in Arizona David R. Berman Professor Emeritus of Political Science Arizona State University November 2019 Throughout the nation, there has been somewhat of a Table 1. Arizona Population, Percent Urban, Compared to revival in urban living, and many big cities seem relatively National Population* well off in economic terms, though progress has been uneven. On the other hand, many rural areas have been Year Arizona Percent National Population Population in decline and seem likely to continue to lose out when it Urban Percent Urban comes to population, economic development, and political influence in state politics. A wide variety of socio-economic 1900 122,931 15.9 39.6 measurements indicate that rural counties are in particularly bad shape, far worse off than the other major population 1910 204,354 31.0 45.6 groupings of big cities, suburbs, and small-to-medium metro 1920 334,162 36.1 51.2 areas.1 Population losses, unemployment, and poverty are 1930 435,573 34.4 56.1 common to many small towns in rural areas. One can find numerous examples of towns where a major employer has 1940 499,261 34.8 56.5 shut down or moved away and the community shrinks to a 1950 749,587 55.5 64.0 point where governments can do virtually nothing to stem 1960 74.5 69.9 the contraction.2 1,302,161 1970 1,770,900 79.6 73.6 This report, based on an examination of population, voting, 1980 2,718,215 83.8 73.7 and governmental spending information, relevant archival and secondary sources, and a series of interviews, looks into 1990 3,665,228 87.5 75.2 the long-term developments affecting urban-rural relations 2000 5,130,632 88.2 79.0 in Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • Libertarians in Bush's World
    ESSAY ON LIBERTY+ LIBERTARIANS IN BUSH’S WORLD Todd Seavey* Imagine ordinary, non-ideological people hearing about an obscure politi- cal sect called libertarianism, which emphasizes self-ownership, property rights, resistance to tyranny and violence, the reduction of taxation and regulation, control over one’s own investments, and the de-emphasizing of litigation as a primary means of dispute resolution. Since this philosophy has very few adherents in the general population and is very much a minority position among intellectuals, one might expect proponents of the creed to count themselves lucky, given the likely alternatives, if the president of the country in which most of them live increasingly emphasized the themes of freedom and ownership in his major speeches; toppled brutal totalitarian regimes in two countries while hounding democracy-hating theocratic terrorists around the globe; cut taxes (despite howls even from some in the free-market camp that the cuts were too deep); called for simplification of the tax code; appointed relatively industry-friendly officials to major regulatory bodies such as the Environmental Protection Agency and the Food and Drug Administration despite frequent criti- cism by the media; proposed partially privatizing Social Security (America’s largest socialist boondoggle but one long regarded as sacrosanct by political analysts); and pushed tort reform to combat the chilling effect of lawsuits on doctors and manu- facturers. + Essays on Liberty is a continuing series of the Journal of Law & Liberty, dedicated to explorations of freedom and law from perspectives outside the legal academy. * Director of Publications for the American Council on Science and Health (ACSH.org, HealthFactsAnd- Fears.com), which does not necessarily endorse the views expressed here.
    [Show full text]
  • (Pdf) Download
    NATIONAL & LOCAL NEWS MEDIA TV, RADIO, PRINT & ONLINE SOURCES Master List - Updated 04/2019 Pain Warriors Unite Washington Post: Website: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/submit-an-op-ed/?utm_term=.d1efbe184dbb What are the guidelines for letter submissions? Email: [email protected] We prefer letters that are fewer than 200 words and take as their starting point an article or other item appearing in The Post. They may not have been submitted to, posted to or published by any other media. They must include the writer's full name; anonymous letters and letters written under pseudonyms will not be considered. For verification purposes, they must also include the writer's home address, email address and telephone numbers, including a daytime telephone number. Writers should disclose any personal or financial interest in the subject matter of their letters. If sending email, please put the text of the letter in the body and do not send attachments; attachments will not be read. What are the guidelines for op-ed submissions? Submissions should be limited to 800 words. We consider only completed articles and cannot commit to, or provide guidance on, article proposals. Op-eds may not have been submitted to, posted to or published by any other media. They must include the writer's full name — anonymous op-eds or op-eds written under pseudonyms will not be considered. They also must include the writer's home address, email address and telephone numbers. Additionally, we ask that writers disclose any personal or financial interest in the subject at hand. Please use our op-ed submission form L.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Intellectual Property's Leviathan
    KAPCZYNSKI_BOOKPROOF (DO NOT DELETE) 12/3/2014 2:10 PM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY’S LEVIATHAN AMY KAPCZYNSKI* Neoliberalism is a complex, multifaceted concept. As such, it offers many possible points of entry into my primary field of study, that of intellectual property (IP) law. We might begin by investigating tensions between IP law and a purely economic conception of neoliberalism, for example.1 Or we might consider whether or how IP law might be “insulated from democratic governance” while also being rapidly assembled.2 In these few pages, I want to focus instead on a different line of inquiry, one that reveals the powerful grip that one particular neoliberal conception has on our contemporary imaginary: the neoliberal conception of the state. Today, both those who defend robust private IP law and their most prominent critics, I will show, typically describe Copyright © 2014 by Amy Kapczynski. This article is also available at http://lcp.law.duke.edu/. * Associate Professor of Law, Yale Law School. Many thanks to Talha Syed, David Grewal, and Jed Purdy for helpful conversation and comments. This paper is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International license and should be reproduced as “first published in 77 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS 131 (Fall 2014).” 1. Neoliberalism is commonly understood in economic terms. See, e.g., David Singh Grewal & Jedediah Purdy, Introduction: Law and Neoliberalism, 77 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS., no. 4, 2014 at 1. David Harvey has argued, however, that neoliberalism as “a political project to re-establish the conditions for capital accumulation and to restore the power of economic elites” tends to prevail over the “economic utopian” conception of neoliberalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Famous Journalist Research Project
    Famous Journalist Research Project Name:____________________________ The Assignment: You will research a famous journalist and present to the class your findings. You will introduce the ​ journalist, describe his/her major accomplishments, why he/she is famous, how he/she got his/her start in journalism, pertinent personal information, and be able answer any questions from the journalism class. You should make yourself an "expert" on this person. You should know more about the person than you actually present. You will need to gather your information from a wide variety of sources: Internet, TV, magazines, newspapers, etc. You must include a list of all sources you consult. For modern day journalists, you MUST read/watch something they have done. (ie. If you were presenting on Barbara Walters, then you must actually watch at least one interview/story she has done, or a portion of one, if an entire story isn't available. If you choose a writer, then you must read at least ONE article written by that person.) Source Ideas: Biography.com, ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX, CNN or any news websites. NO WIKIPEDIA! The Presentation: You may be as creative as you wish to be. You may use note cards or you may memorize your ​ presentation. You must have at least ONE visual!! Any visual must include information as well as be creative. Some possibilities include dressing as the character (if they have a distinctive way of dressing) & performing in first person (imitating the journalist), creating a video, PowerPoint or make a poster of the journalist’s life, a photo album, a smore, or something else! The main idea: Be creative as well as informative.
    [Show full text]
  • Nine Lives of Neoliberalism
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Plehwe, Dieter (Ed.); Slobodian, Quinn (Ed.); Mirowski, Philip (Ed.) Book — Published Version Nine Lives of Neoliberalism Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Plehwe, Dieter (Ed.); Slobodian, Quinn (Ed.); Mirowski, Philip (Ed.) (2020) : Nine Lives of Neoliberalism, ISBN 978-1-78873-255-0, Verso, London, New York, NY, https://www.versobooks.com/books/3075-nine-lives-of-neoliberalism This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/215796 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative
    [Show full text]
  • Download Issue (PDF)
    VOLUME 61, NO 10 DECEMBER 2011 Features 8 Unemployment: What’s To Be Done? by Warren C. Gibson 11 Scientism and the Great Power Nexus by Max Borders 17 A Return to Gold? by John A.Allison and John L. Chapman 22 The Family Stone: Cavemen, Trade, and Comparative Advantage by Richard W.Fulmer 27 The Twisted Tree of Progressivism by Joseph R. Stromberg 34 Money Is Not Speech by Michael Cummins 36 The Age of the Busybody by Ridgway Knight Foley, Jr. Page 17 Columns 2 Perspective ~ Elizabeth Warren’s Non Sequitur by Sheldon Richman 4 Ideas and Consequences ~ Wanted:A Healthy Dose of Humility by Lawrence W.Reed 6 Keynesianism Doesn’t Mean Bigger Government? It Just Ain’t So! by Steven Horwitz 15 Our Economic Past ~ The First Government Bailouts: The Story of the RFC by Burton Folsom, Jr. 25 Peripatetics ~ Social Cooperation, Part 2 by Sheldon Richman 32 The Therapeutic State ~ Imprisoning Innocents by Thomas Szasz 40 Give Me a Break! ~ Ten Years After by John Stossel Page 25 47 The Pursuit of Happiness ~ Population Control Nonsense by Walter E.Williams Book Reviews 42 Pearl Harbor: The Seeds and Fruits of Infamy by Percy L. Greaves, Jr., edited by Bettina Bien Greaves Reviewed by Jim Powell 43 Crisis Economics: A Crash Course in the Future of Finance by Nouriel Roubini and Stephen Mihm Reviewed by George Selgin 44 Back on the Road to Serfdom: The Resurgence of Statism edited by Thomas E.Woods, Jr. Reviewed by George Leef 45 The Pursuit of Justice: Law and Economics of Legal Institutions edited by Edward J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legislative Update for January 22, 2016 This E-Mail Is Provided As a Courtesy of the Governor's Advisory Council on Aging
    Welcome to the Legislative Update for January 22, 2016 This e-mail is provided as a courtesy of the Governor's Advisory Council on Aging. The purpose of this service is to keep older Arizonans and advocates of aging services informed about bills and actions taking place at the Arizona State Legislature and to highlight federal legislation or activities affecting older Americans. The information is intended to help you shape your own opinion about an issue and give you the necessary resources and contacts so that you can ensure your perspective and voice are heard. The Legislative Update is non-partisan in nature. Thank you for your interest! *********************************************** 52nd Legislature, 2nd Regular Session opened on Monday, January 11, 2016 The Governor delivered his second State of the State Address which can be viewed HERE. A list of the members of the House of Representatives and Senate can be found on the Arizona State Legislature website at the following links: Members of the House Members of the Senate Standing Committees (Be sure to click on the committee to view the members as well as any posted meeting agendas or minutes for the committee.) *********************************************** Schedules Arizona State Legislature ALIS Today calendar HERE House Weekly Schedule Senate 2016 Committee Schedule List HERE *********************************************** Deadlines Senate 2016 Session Timeline You can watch Live Proceedings at: http://azleg.granicus.com/Mediaplayer.php?publish_id=5 Tuesday was the last day for Senate members to submit bill requests to the Legislative Council. Monday, 1/25 is the last day for House members to submit bill requests to Legislative Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Looking Backward: Richard Epstein Ponders the "Progressive" Peril
    Michigan Law Review Volume 105 Issue 6 2007 Looking Backward: Richard Epstein Ponders the "Progressive" Peril Michael Allan Wolf University of Florida Levin College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Legal History Commons, and the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Recommended Citation Michael A. Wolf, Looking Backward: Richard Epstein Ponders the "Progressive" Peril, 105 MICH. L. REV. 1233 (2007). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol105/iss6/14 This Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LOOKING BACKWARD: RICHARD EPSTEIN PONDERS THE "PROGRESSIVE" PERIL Michael Allan Wolf* How PROGRESSIVES REWROTE THE CONSTITUTION. By Richard A. Epstein. Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute. 2006. Pp. xiii, 156. $15.95. INTRODUCTION The utmost possible liberty to the individual, and the fullest possible pro- tection to him and his property, is both the limitation and duty of government. If it may regulate the price of one service, which is not a pub- lic service, or the compensation for the use of one kind of property which is not devoted to a public use, why may it not with equal reason regulate the price of all service, and the compensation to be paid for the use of all property? And if so, "Looking Backward" is nearer than a dream.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Richard Epstein and the New Zealand Employment Contract
    Wailes: Professor Richard Epstein and the New Zealand Employment Contract PROFESSOR RICHARD EPSTEIN AND THE NEW ZEALAND EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS ACT: A CRITIQUE NICK WAILES* Penelope Brook, one of the major proponents of radical reform in the New Zealand labor law system, has characterized the New Zealand Em- ployment Contracts Act (ECA) as an "incomplete revolution."' She argues that this "incompleteness" stems from the retention of a specialist labor law jurisdiction and the failure to frame the Act around the principle of contract at will.2 The emphasis placed on these two issues-specialist jurisdiction and contract at will-demonstrates the influence arguments made by Chi- cago Law Professor, Richard Epstein, have played on labor law reform in New Zealand. Despite reservations about its final form, Brook gives her support to the ECA, precisely because it operationalizes some of Epstein's ideas. It has been generally acknowledged that ideas like those of Epstein played a significant role in the introduction of the ECA in New Zealand. However, while critics of the ECA have acknowledged the importance of Epstein's ideas in the debate which led up to the passing of the Act, few at- tempts have been made to outline clearly or critique Epstein's views. This Paper attempts to fill this lacuna by providing a critique of the behavioral assumptions that Epstein brings to his analysis of labor law. The first sec- * The Department of Industrial Relations, The University of Sydney, Australia. This is an amended version of Nick Wailes, The Case Against Specialist Jurisdictionfor Labor Law: PhilosophicalAssumptions of a Common Law for Labor Relations, 19 N.Z.J.
    [Show full text]