DOCSLIB.ORG

GLOBAL WARMING, and NUCLEAR POWER

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GLOBAL WARMING, and NUCLEAR POWER fenerF AEI Public Opinion S Studies POLLS ON THE ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY, GLOBAL WARMING, and NUCLEAR POWER Compiled by Karlyn Bowman, Resident Fellow, AEI, Eleanor O’Neil, Research Assistant, AEI, and Heather Sims, Research Assistant, AEI (April 2016) Special thanks to former Senior Research Associate Jennifer Marsico and former Research Assistant Andrew Rugg for their help compiling this document. The data in this report come from the archive of public opinion polls at AEI and from the Roper Center for Public Opinion Research’s iPOLL Databank. To learn more about the Roper Center, visit http://ropercenter.cornell.edu/. Table of Contents The Environment and Energy ............................................................................................. 2 The Politics of the Issue .......................................................................................................3 Party Best Able to Handle Environmental Issues ............................................................3 The Environment as a Voting Issue: Exit Polls ...............................................................6 The Obama Administration and Environmental and Energy Policy ...............................7 President Obama’s Handling of Energy Policy ...............................................................9 The Bush Administration and Environmental Policy ....................................................11 The Clinton Administration and Environmental Policy ................................................16 Obama v Romney on the Environment, Global Warming, and Energy ........................17 Obama v McCain on the Environment and Global Warming .......................................17 Bush v Kerry on the Environment .................................................................................17 The Significance of the Issue .............................................................................................19 Personal Worries about the Environment ......................................................................26 Trends on Different Environmental Problems .............................................................. 28 Rating the Environment Today ......................................................................................33 Priorities and Trade-offs ................................................................................................36 Environmental Activism ................................................................................................42 Global Warming.................................................................................................................50 How Much People Know ...............................................................................................51 Is It Real? Americans’ Views ........................................................................................54 Is It Real? Americans’ Views of Scientists’ Views .......................................................62 Causes of Global Warming ............................................................................................64 Seriousness of Global Warming: Today ........................................................................68 Seriousness of Global Warming: In the Future .............................................................77 What Should Be Done To Address Environmental and Energy Issues .........................81 What Should be Done: Miscellaneous ...........................................................................97 Presidents’ and Political Parties’ Handling of Global Warming .................................100 Kyoto Protocol and International Efforts .....................................................................103 Cap and Trade ..............................................................................................................106 Energy Issues ...................................................................................................................108 Offshore Drilling ..........................................................................................................109 The BP Oil Spill ...........................................................................................................113 Keystone XL Pipeline ..................................................................................................119 Fracking .......................................................................................................................123 Nuclear Energy ................................................................................................................130 Attitudes Toward Nuclear Energy ...............................................................................130 Government and Nuclear Energy.................................................................................138 Nuclear Plants in Your Community .............................................................................141 Nuclear Energy Safety .................................................................................................144 2011 Japanese Nuclear Crisis ......................................................................................148 Three Mile Island .........................................................................................................149 1 The Environment and Energy This AEI Public Opinion Study examines polls on the environment, energy, nuclear power, and global warming. In the first section, we look at national polls on the politics of the environment. Democrats lead Republicans by a substantial margin nationally as the party best able to handle environmental issues. Surprisingly, no questions were asked during the 2012 presidential campaign about whether Barack Obama or Mitt Romney would be better at handling the environment. The absence of questions tells a great deal about how little the issue featured in the pollsters’ minds in the 2012 election. A few questions were asked about which candidate would be better at handling energy issues. We also include available trends from the major pollsters on how recent presidents have handled the issue in this document. Questions about President Barack Obama’s handling of the environment are not asked regularly by most pollsters. The President’s ratings on handling the environment have declined over the course of his presidency in most polls. In the latest poll from Gallup, taken in March 2016, 54 percent, down from 79 percent early in his presidency, said he was doing a good job handling the environment. Questions about George W. Bush’s handling of the environment were also not asked as often as questions about his handling of foreign policy or the economy, but he tended to receive negative marks on the issue late in his presidency. The data show that the environment is not an issue on the front burner for most Americans today. In Pew’s 2016 question about priorities for President Obama and Congress, 47 percent said “protecting the environment” should be a top priority. As a point of comparison, 75 percent said strengthening the nation’s economy and, separately, defending the country from terrorism should be a top priority. Still, more people in 2016 said protecting the environment should be a top priority than gave that response about dealing with global climate change (47 and 38 percent, respectively). Thirty-eight percent said global warming should be a top priority. In general, Americans today are sympathetic to, but not active in, the environmental movement. In Gallup’s latest question, asked in 2014, 18 percent said they were active in the movement, while 42 percent said they were sympathetic but not active. As for evaluating the impact of the environmental movement, 76 percent told Gallup in 1992 that the movement had definitely or probably done more good than harm. In 2010, 62 percent gave that response. In 1971, 42.9 percent of college freshmen said that being involved in programs to clean up the environment was an objective considered essential or very important for them. In 2014, 26 percent gave that response. There is no indication from this poll or others that young people’s commitment to a clean and healthful environment has lessened. They, like most Americans, simply attach less urgency to it than in the past. When the public cares deeply about something, as they do about the environment, they often give answers that are designed to keep the pressure on legislators. That doesn’t mean they are paying close attention to debates in Washington. The public rarely gives specific legislative advice about complex environmental policy debates. This document includes six major sections – the politics of the issue, the significance of the issue, global warming, energy issues, gas prices, and nuclear energy. For commentary concerning each of these issues, see the respective sections. 2 The Politics of the Issue Party Best Able to Handle Environmental Issues Let me ask you who you feel can do a better job on each of the same things – the Democrats or the Republicans… controlling air and water pollution? (Harris) In your opinion, which of the two major parties has the best vision to address each of the following major issues . protecting the environment? (Harris Interactive, 2016) Which political party, the Republicans or the Democrats, would do a better job protecting the environment? (ABC News/Washington Post) Which political party, the Republican or the Democratic, do you think can do a better job of protecting the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Theda Skocpol
    NAMING THE PROBLEM What It Will Take to Counter Extremism and Engage Americans in the Fight against Global Warming Theda Skocpol Harvard University January 2013 Prepared for the Symposium on THE POLITICS OF AMERICA’S FIGHT AGAINST GLOBAL WARMING Co-sponsored by the Columbia School of Journalism and the Scholars Strategy Network February 14, 2013, 4-6 pm Tsai Auditorium, Harvard University CONTENTS Making Sense of the Cap and Trade Failure Beyond Easy Answers Did the Economic Downturn Do It? Did Obama Fail to Lead? An Anatomy of Two Reform Campaigns A Regulated Market Approach to Health Reform Harnessing Market Forces to Mitigate Global Warming New Investments in Coalition-Building and Political Capabilities HCAN on the Left Edge of the Possible Climate Reformers Invest in Insider Bargains and Media Ads Outflanked by Extremists The Roots of GOP Opposition Climate Change Denial The Pivotal Battle for Public Opinion in 2006 and 2007 The Tea Party Seals the Deal ii What Can Be Learned? Environmentalists Diagnose the Causes of Death Where Should Philanthropic Money Go? The Politics Next Time Yearning for an Easy Way New Kinds of Insider Deals? Are Market Forces Enough? What Kind of Politics? Using Policy Goals to Build a Broader Coalition The Challenge Named iii “I can’t work on a problem if I cannot name it.” The complaint was registered gently, almost as a musing after-thought at the end of a June 2012 interview I conducted by telephone with one of the nation’s prominent environmental leaders. My interlocutor had played a major role in efforts to get Congress to pass “cap and trade” legislation during 2009 and 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Talk Radio and Its Impact on Politics and Public Policy
    Mount Rushmore: The Rise of Talk Radio and Its Impact on Politics and Public Policy Brian Asher Rosenwald Wynnewood, PA Master of Arts, University of Virginia, 2009 Bachelor of Arts, University of Pennsylvania, 2006 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Virginia August, 2015 !1 © Copyright 2015 by Brian Asher Rosenwald All Rights Reserved August 2015 !2 Acknowledgements I am deeply indebted to the many people without whom this project would not have been possible. First, a huge thank you to the more than two hundred and twenty five people from the radio and political worlds who graciously took time from their busy schedules to answer my questions. Some of them put up with repeated follow ups and nagging emails as I tried to develop an understanding of the business and its political implications. They allowed me to keep most things on the record, and provided me with an understanding that simply would not have been possible without their participation. When I began this project, I never imagined that I would interview anywhere near this many people, but now, almost five years later, I cannot imagine the project without the information gleaned from these invaluable interviews. I have been fortunate enough to receive fellowships from the Fox Leadership Program at the University of Pennsylvania and the Corcoran Department of History at the University of Virginia, which made it far easier to complete this dissertation. I am grateful to be a part of the Fox family, both because of the great work that the program does, but also because of the terrific people who work at Fox.
    [Show full text]
  • Aei Studies in Public Opinion
    AEI STUDIES IN PUBLIC OPINION POLLS ON THE ENVIRONMENT AND GLOBAL WARMING Updated Apr. 20, 2009 http://www.aei.org/publicopinion11 This AEI Public Opinion Study examines polls on the environment and global warming. In the first section, we look at national polls on the politics of the environment. Democrats lead Republicans by a substantial margin nationally as the party best able to handle environmental issues. This held true in the 2008 election cycle although the polls indicate that the issue was not a top priority for voters. Barack Obama also led John McCain by a substantial margin in the polls on handling the issue. We include available trends from the major pollsters on how recent presidents have handled the issue in this document. Questions about George W. Bush’s handling of the environment were not asked as often as questions about his handling of foreign policy or the economy, but he tended to receive negative marks on the issue late in his presidency. Questions about President Barack Obama’s handling of the environment have yet to surface. The polls show that the environment is not an issue on the front burner for most Americans today. In Pew’s question about priorities for President Obama and Congress, 41 percent said “protecting the environment” should be a top priority. That is the lowest rating for the issue since Pew began to ask the question in 1997. Other issues such as the economy and unemployment are of much greater concern today. Most Americans consider themselves sympathetic to, but not active in, the environmental movement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Common Sense Rhetorics of Anti-Science: Testimonies from Creationists and Anti- Environmentalists
    THE COMMON SENSE RHETORICS OF ANTI-SCIENCE: TESTIMONIES FROM CREATIONISTS AND ANTI- ENVIRONMENTALISTS By CHRISTINE HARRELL SEIFERT Bachelor of Science North Dakota State University Fargo, North Dakota 1997 Master of Arts North Dakota State University Fargo, North Dakota 2000 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May, 2005 THE COMMON SENSE RHETORICS OF ANTI-SCIENCE: TESTIMONIES OF CREATIONISTS AND ANTI- ENVIRONMENTALISTS Dissertation Approved: Dr. Richard Batteiger Dissertation Adviser Dr. Carol Moder Dr. Melissa Ianetta Dr. Margaret Ewing Dr. A. Gordon Emslie Dean of the Graduate College ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project has demonstrated to me the truly collaborative nature of writing; I owe much gratitude to those who helped me create this dissertation. First, I thank Drs. Carol Moder and Margaret Ewing for their work on my committee and their helpful comments. Thanks to Dr. Melissa Ianetta for her insightful questions, which helped me to think more critically about my methods of analysis. I also owe thanks to Dr. Denise Tillery who assisted in the inception of my research questions. In addition, I’d like to thank her for her willingness to read drafts, answer questions, and give encouragement whenever I needed it. My early discussions with her about science and rhetoric provided the basis for the entire project. Thanks also go to Dr. Shelley Reid who provided last- minute moral support. I owe special thanks to Dr. Richard Batteiger who valiantly stepped in as dissertation advisor more than halfway through the project.
    [Show full text]
  • US Politics and Climate Change: Science Confronts Policy
    EXCERPTED FROM US Politics and Climate Change: Science Confronts Policy Glen Sussman and Byron W. Daynes Copyright © 2013 ISBN: 978-1-58826-899-0 hc 1800 30th Street, Ste. 314 Boulder, CO 80301 USA telephone 303.444.6684 fax 303.444.0824 This excerpt was downloaded from the Lynne Rienner Publishers website www.rienner.com Contents List of Tables and Figures vii Acknowledgments ix 1 Policy Deadlock: Grappling with Climate Change 1 2 Science Meets Government Bureaucracy 21 3 Congress and the Legislative Process 51 4 Presidential Leadership from Truman to Obama 77 5 The Role of the Judiciary 109 6 Interest Groups and Public Opinion 131 7 The States Weigh In 163 8 Assessing the US Response to Climate Change 193 Bibliography 211 Index 237 About the Book 245 v 1 Policy Deadlock: Grappling with Climate Change It is “unequivocal” that the climate is and will continue to change, and that human generation of greenhouse gases is responsible for most related changes since the 1950s. Climate change will affect national security in the broadest sense, potentially affect - ing everything from economic growth to social stability. More narrowly, global climate change may spur sudden onset (i.e., hur - ricanes and floods) and slow onset (i.e., droughts and famines) disasters around the world, provoking humanitarian crises that will require military and other government responses. —International Panel on Climate Change 1 Between 1990 and 2007, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a body composed of many of the world’s leading sci - entists and established by the United Nations Environment Programme and the World Meteorological Organization, published several reports regarding global climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology & Ideology: an Introduction
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette English Faculty Research and Publications English, Department of 1-1-2010 Ecology & Ideology: An Introduction Gerry Canavan Marquette University, [email protected] Lisa Klarr Ryan Vu Accepted version. Polygraph, Vol. 22 (2010): 1-31. Publisher Link. © 2010 Duke University Press. Used with permission. Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette English Faculty Research and Publications/College of Arts and Sciences This paper is NOT THE PUBLISHED VERSION; but the author’s final, peer-reviewed manuscript. The published version may be accessed by following the link in the citation below. Polygraph, Vol. 22 (2010): 1-31. DOI. This article is © Duke University Press and permission has been granted for this version to appear in e-Publications@Marquette. Duke University Press does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Duke University Press. Ecology & Ideology: An Introduction Gerard Canavan Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI What is really amazing and frustrating is mankind’s habit of refusing to see the obvious and inevitable, until it is there, and then muttering about unforeseen catastrophes. —Isaac Asimov1 How small the vastest of human catastrophes may seem, at a distance of a few million miles. —H.G. Wells2 Ecology as Critique From Hurricane Katrina to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill to the metastasizing specter of climate change, an initial foray into the rhetoric of “natural” disasters over the past decade finds surprise and shock as a primary theme. Whatever happens, “no one could have predicted” the results; ostensibly secular pundits have learned to comfortably and without contradiction invoke “acts of God” as the first line of defense against anyone ever being held responsible for anything.
    [Show full text]
  • Handley, George B. "Climate Scepticism and Christian Conservatism in the United States." Climate Change Scepticism: a Transnational Ecocritical Analysis
    Handley, George B. "Climate Scepticism and Christian Conservatism in the United States." Climate Change Scepticism: A Transnational Ecocritical Analysis. By Greg GarrardAxel GoodbodyGeorge HandleyStephanie Posthumus. London,: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019. 133–174. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 30 Sep. 2021. <http:// dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350057050.ch-004>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 30 September 2021, 07:54 UTC. Copyright © Greg Garrard, George Handley, Axel Goodbody and Stephanie Posthumus 2019. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 4 Climate Scepticism and Christian Conservatism in the United States George B. Handley Since the findings of climate science were first brought to the attention of US Congress in the 1980s, climate scepticism has exercised a persistent and authoritative influence over American policymakers and the general public, and has been the object of more academic attention than in any other country (see Introduction). Although directed at a new phenomenon of climate change, this scepticism emerged from a Cold War discourse that sought protection for the free market, promoted technology as a means to liberate humankind from the contingencies of nature, celebrated American exceptionalism and argued for the nation’s Christian origins. Because concern about climate change, along with the policies its advocates sought to implement, came predominantly
    [Show full text]