DOCSLIB.ORG

D8.2 Report Summarizing the Status of the Development of UEMS-EU Harmonized Educational Principles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
D8.2 Report Summarizing the Status of the Development of UEMS-EU Harmonized Educational Principles Ref. Ares(2019)2255680 - 29/03/2019 “This Deliverable is a part of the joint action “724161/JARC” which has received funding from the European Union’s Health Programme (2014-2020)”. “The content of this Deliverable represents the views of the authors only and they are sole responsibility: it can not be considered to reflect the views of the European Commission and or the Country, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency or any other body of the European Union. The European Commission and the Agency do not accept any responsibility for use that may of the information it contains”. Deliverable no: D8.2 Title: Report summarizing the status of the development of UEMS-EU harmonized educational principles and recommended training materials for rare cancers 1 Table of contents 1. Description 3 1.1 The Joint Action on Rare Cancers 3 1.2 Work Package X 3 1.3 Aim and purpose of deliverable 3 1.4 The target group of the specific deliverable 4 1.5 Summary of the main conclusions of the deliverable 4 2. Introduction 4 3. Material and method 4 4. Results 4 5. Discussion 4 2 Table of contents 1. Description 1.1 The Joint Action on Rare Cancers Description The Joint Action on Rare Cancers (JARC) is aimed to integrate and maximize efforts of the European Union (EU) Commission, EU Member States and all stakeholders to advance quality of care and research on rare cancers. The public health challenges posed by rare cancers include the limited professional expertise in the community, the difficulties in clinical research, the need of a timely and appropriate diagnosis and optimal treatment from the very beginning of the patient’s journey. An accurate clinical, pathologic and biological assessment of the disease of the individual patient is key to survival and cure, as well as an expert clinical decision provided by a multidisciplinary team. To this end, proper referral of patients and effective clinical networking are crucial in rare cancers. This is the main reason why JARC decided to shape its efforts around the new European Reference Networks (ERNs) with the following objectives: 1. Improving epidemiological surveillance of rare cancers in the EU 2. Identifying standards of care for all families of rare cancers to ensure sharing of best practices and equality of care for rare cancers across Europe, particularly through clinical networking 3. Improving the implementation at local level and within ERNs of clinical practice guidelines on rare cancers 4. Promoting integration of translational research innovations into rare cancer care 5. Improving education on rare cancers for medical and non-medical experts to ameliorate management of rare cancers and to improve rare cancer patients’ empowerment in the EU 6. Identifying core strategies to incorporate in National cancer plans and Rare disease plans to address the specific needs of rare cancers across EU MSs The JARC is structured in 10 work packages (WPs). Three cross cutting WPs (WP1 coordination, WP2 dissemination, WP3 evaluation) and 7 specific WPs based on the JARC objectives: WP4 epidemiology, WP5 quality of care, WP6 clinical practice guidelines, WP7 innovation and access to innovation, WP8 medical education, WP9 childhood cancers and, WP10 rare cancers policy. Patients work across all work packages, driving the JARC efforts along the needs of the only end users of all what we can do, in care and research as well. 1.2 Work Package WP8 This WP was devoted to work on different aspects of medical education of experts involved in the diagnostics and care of rare cancer patients. A major issue was to map educational resources available for experts involved in the treatment of rare cancers, including childhood cancers, targeting both the undergraduate and the postgraduate medical training; to identify how to improve, enlarge and harmonize their educational offer on rare cancers and how medical education on all families of rare cancers can be integrated into ERNs, and into the pan- European qualified training and assessment systems. As a means to address specific needs of medical education in rare cancers, a survey on under- and postgraduate training programs was conducted. 1.3 Aim and purpose of deliverable The best description of the original goals of D8.2 is that the goals included, that considering all available resources, a long-term goal was to provide recommendations on how to connect educational instruments with the networked daily rare-cancer health care. The goals included to provide recommendations on the development of postgraduate training systems, assessment and training-accreditation criteria and guidelines in 3 collaboration with the specific Sections of the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS), as well as on training requirements in Europe (ETR). This included exploring the model of “physician-scientists”, in an effort to bridge the gap between basic and translational research, and exploring how ERNs can be involved. 1.4 The target group of the specific deliverable Medical experts, laboratory experts, nurses and counsellors, advocacy groups experts, patients, ultimately besides the persons mentioned, all medical specialist could be targeted in some extenet with specific rare cancer aspects. 1.5 Summary of the main conclusions of the deliverable The survey revealed several weaknesses in the current status in medical expert training. 2. Introduction The UEMS, UEMS Multidisciplinary Joint Commettee of Rare and Undiagnosed Diseases (MJC RUD), UEMS Section of Medical Genetics (SMG), the European Board of Medical Genetivs (EBMG), and the European Society of Human Genetics (ESHG) were involved in part as partners in almost all objectives of WP8 (Medical education). 3. Material and method There was a "survey" and an "Expert meeting" 4. Results Resuts of the Survey could be found in the Appendix. 5. Discussion Involvement of the UEMS into the WP8 tasks was a priority from the beginning of the JARC, and we proceeded with the parallel on different activities. The UEMS was involved in the task of Survey on the Medical Education. During the design, we used the listed and recognized official UEMS medical disciplines. The survey was circulated amongst the UEMS sections, multidisciplinary joint committees, and thematic federations; finally we got 69.2% respones from UEMS members. The results were discussed amongst the members of the Section of Medical Genetics and Multidisciplinary Joint Committee on rare and Undiagnosed Diseases. The same stands for the M8.2: List of recommendations on how to connect educational instruments with the networked daily rare-cancer health care available discussed among WP8 partners; and for the M8.3 to improve the training of non-MDs. Both of them were discussed by UEMS experts, and by the EBMG (European Board of Medical Genetics) members and its General Assembly, which is a strategic partner of the UEMS. The conclusions of the survey are summerized in the attached appendix, the messages usually are clear. After the Milano GA meeting a decision was taken to proceed with the UEMS MJC RUD in the direction towards establishing a European Examination of Rare Adult Solid Cancers. At the October's Council meeting, the MJC RUD gathering decised and the first draft of the ETR (European Training Requirement, attached) with a first version of Syllabus was introduced at the Budapest Expert meeting. The participants agreed that this is a kind of milestone; this draft will be used for further development. 4 Attached materials: 1., Survey with evaluation 2., Draft of ETR of Rare Solid Adult Cancers 3., Syllabus 5 Joint Action on Rare Cancers Survey on Medical Education for Undergraduates and Postgraduates 2017 Online Survey and Results 6 I. Joint Action on Rare Cancers - Survey on Medical Education for Undergraduates and Postgraduates * Required 1. BASICS Within the framework of Joint Action on Rare Cancer (http://jointactionrarecancers.eu/) WP8 you are invited to participate in the following survey. Our goal is to collect data on the education and training programs currently available for under- and postgraduates related to the rare cancers, including childhood cancers. In the present survey the current classification of the rare cancers is the reference material: 1. Head and neck cancers (cancers of nasal cavity and sinuses, nasopharynx, hypopharynx, larynx, salivary glands, oropharynx, oral cavity and lip, eye, middle ear) 2. Thoracic rare cancers (tumours of trachea, thymus, malignant mesothelioma) 3. Male genital and urogenital rare cancers (tumours of testis, penis, renal pelvis, ureter, urethra and extragonodal germ cell tumours) 4. Female genital rare cancers (tumours of vulva and vagina, non epithelial tumours of ovary, trophoblastic tumours of the placenta) 5. Neuroendocrine tumours 6. Tumours of the endocrine organs (cancers of thyroid, parathyroid, adrenal cortex, pituitary gland) 7. Central Nervous System tumours (Glial tumours, medulloblastoma, malignant meningioma) 8. Sarcomas (sort tissue sarcomas, bone sarcomas, gastrointestinal stromal tumours) 9. Digestive rare cancers (Tumours of small intestine, anal canal, gallbladder and extrahepatic biliary duct) 10. Rare skin cancers and non-cutaneous melanoma (melanoma of mucosae and of the uvea, adnexal skin carcinomas, Kaposi sarcoma) 11. Haematological rare malignancies (acute myeloid leukemia, myeloproliferative neoplasms, myelodisplastic and myeloproliferative neoplasms, histiocytic and dendritic cell neoplasms) 12. Pediatric cancers (all pediatric cancers are considered as rare cancers) 7 1. YOUR DATA 1. Your affiliation (Tick all that applies) * Check all that apply. Medical University . Other University . Healthcare Provider . Other: 2. Your Training (Tick all that applies) * Check all that apply. MD . PhD . Other: 3. Your Age * Mark only one oval. 20-30 . 31-40 . 41-50 . 51-60 . 61< 4. Your Nationality * 5. Are you involved in JARC? * Mark only one oval. Yes . No 8 6. Are you involved in any UEMS activity? * Mark only one oval. Yes . No Your Name (obligatory if you have JARC or UEMS affiliation): Skip to question 8. 2. UNDERGRADUATE TRAINING 7. Are you involved in the training of medical students? * Mark only one oval.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma: Clinical Aspects, and Therapeutic Perspectives
    REVIEW ARTICLE Annals of Gastroenterology (2018) 31, 1-11 Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: clinical aspects, and therapeutic perspectives Stergios Boussiosa, Michele Moschettab, Afroditi Karathanasia, Alexandros K. Tsiourisc, Foivos S. Kanellosc, Konstantina Tatsid, Konstantinos H. Katsanose, Dimitrios K. Christodouloue Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Kent, UK; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, UK; University of Ioannina, Greece; General Hospital G. Hatzikosta, Ioannina, Greece Abstract Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare disease with a wide clinical spectrum. It arises from the peritoneal lining and commonly presents with diffuse, extensive spread throughout the abdomen and, more rarely, metastatic spread beyond the abdominal cavity. Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and positron-emission tomography are important diagnostic tools used for the preoperative staging of MPM. The definitive diagnosis is based on histopathological analysis, mainly via immunohistochemistry. In this regard, paired- box gene 8 negativity represents a useful diagnostic biomarker for differentiating MPM from ovarian carcinoma. In addition, BRCA1-associated protein-1 (BAP1) loss is specific to MPM and allows it to be distinguished from both benign mesothelial lesions and ovarian serous tumors. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has become an increasingly important therapeutic approach, while systemic therapies are still being developed. Histology, Ki-67, completeness of cytoreduction,
    [Show full text]
  • About Ovarian Cancer Overview and Types
    cancer.org | 1.800.227.2345 About Ovarian Cancer Overview and Types If you have been diagnosed with ovarian cancer or are worried about it, you likely have a lot of questions. Learning some basics is a good place to start. ● What Is Ovarian Cancer? Research and Statistics See the latest estimates for new cases of ovarian cancer and deaths in the US and what research is currently being done. ● Key Statistics for Ovarian Cancer ● What's New in Ovarian Cancer Research? What Is Ovarian Cancer? Cancer starts when cells in the body begin to grow out of control. Cells in nearly any part of the body can become cancer and can spread. To learn more about how cancers start and spread, see What Is Cancer?1 Ovarian cancers were previously believed to begin only in the ovaries, but recent evidence suggests that many ovarian cancers may actually start in the cells in the far (distal) end of the fallopian tubes. 1 ____________________________________________________________________________________American Cancer Society cancer.org | 1.800.227.2345 What are the ovaries? Ovaries are reproductive glands found only in females (women). The ovaries produce eggs (ova) for reproduction. The eggs travel from the ovaries through the fallopian tubes into the uterus where the fertilized egg settles in and develops into a fetus. The ovaries are also the main source of the female hormones estrogen and progesterone. One ovary is on each side of the uterus. The ovaries are mainly made up of 3 kinds of cells. Each type of cell can develop into a different type of tumor: ● Epithelial tumors start from the cells that cover the outer surface of the ovary.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesothelin's Role As a Biomarker and Therapeutic Target for Malignant
    cancers Review Hitting the Bull’s-Eye: Mesothelin’s Role as a Biomarker and Therapeutic Target for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Dannel Yeo 1,2,3 , Laura Castelletti 1,2,3 , Nico van Zandwijk 2,3,4 and John E. J. Rasko 1,2,3,5,* 1 Li Ka Shing Cell & Gene Therapy Program, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia; [email protected] (D.Y.); [email protected] (L.C.) 2 Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia; [email protected] 3 Cell and Molecular Therapies, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney Local Health District (SLHD), Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia 4 Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney Local Health District (SLHD), Concord, NSW 2139, Australia 5 Gene and Stem Cell Therapy Program, Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-295656160 Simple Summary: Mesothelioma is a deadly disease with a dismal prognosis. Since its discovery, mesothelin, a cell surface protein, has been a promising biomarker and therapeutic target due to its overexpression in mesothelioma and limited expression in normal cells. This review summarizes the clinical studies that have examined mesothelin as a biomarker and therapeutic target in mesothelioma and explores future perspectives in its role to improve patient management. Abstract: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive cancer with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. MPM originates from the mesothelial lining of the pleura. Mesothelin Citation: Yeo, D.; Castelletti, L.; van (MSLN) is a glycoprotein expressed at low levels in normal tissues and at high levels in MPM.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rare Case of Urachal Adenocarcinoma with Bone Marrow Metastasis Joshua Van Allen1,2
    Case report BMJ Case Rep: first published as 10.1136/bcr-2021-242315 on 15 April 2021. Downloaded from A rare case of urachal adenocarcinoma with bone marrow metastasis Joshua Van Allen1,2 1Department of Medicine, SUMMARY non-urachal adenocarcinomas whose median age is University of Connecticut Health Urachal cancer is a rare and aggressive cancer that often around 69 years old.10 14 Urachal cancer also displays Center, Farmington, Connecticut, presents in advanced stages. Given the rarity of this male predilection, with males representing between USA 7 8 2 malignancy, medical case studies provide one of the few 60% and 68% of all cases. Hartford HealthCare Cancer Patients with urachal cancer often present Institute at The Hospital of sources of literature available through which clinicians with locally advanced or metastatic disease, most Central Connecticut, Plainville, can guide medical management. Surgery is widely Connecticut, USA considered to be the mainstay of therapy when disease commonly metastatic to the lungs, liver, perito- is localised and surgically resectable, therefore most neum, lymph nodes, brain and/or bone.6 8 12 13 Correspondence to current case studies on urachal cancer focus on surgical Given the aggressive nature of urachal cancer, early Dr. Joshua Van Allen; management, occasionally with adjuvant chemotherapy. diagnosis is paramount as there is significant diver- jvanallen@ uchc. edu However, few case studies discuss chemotherapy alone gence in both treatment and prognosis depending in the treatment of metastatic disease. Most studies on stage. A retrospective study performed by Accepted 6 April 2021 indicate a median overall survival between 12 and 24 Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota evaluated 49 months for metastatic urachal adenocarcinoma.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Peritoneal Serous Papillary Carcinoma: a Case Series
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2019) 300:1023–1028 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05280-z GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY Primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma: a case series Nikolaos Blontzos1 · Evangelos Vafas1 · George Vorgias1 · Nikolaos Kalinoglou1 · Christos Iavazzo1 Received: 27 May 2018 / Accepted: 22 August 2019 / Published online: 5 September 2019 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Purpose To present the clinical and laboratory characteristics, as well as the management, of patients with primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma (PPSPC). Methods This is a retrospective study of 19 patients with PPSPC who underwent debulking surgery followed by frst line chemotherapy and were managed in Metaxa Memorial Cancer Hospital between January 2002 and December 2017. Results The median age of the patients was found to be 66 years (range 44–76 years). Clinical presentation of PPSPC included abdominal distention and pain, constipation, as well as loss of appetite and weight gain. Two of the patients did not mention any symptomatology and the disease was suspected by an abnormal cervical smear and elevated CA125 levels respectively. Biomarkers measurement during the initial management of the patients revealed abnormal values of CA125 for all the participants (median value 565 U/ml). Human epididymis secretory protein 4 (HE4) and ratios of blood count were also measured. Perioperative Peritoneal Cancer Index ranged from 6 to 20. Optimal debulking was achieved in 5 cases. All patients were staged as IIIC and IVA PPSPC and received standard chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin, whereas bevacizumab was added in the 5 most recent cases. Median overall survival was 29 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Capecitabine)
    Reference number(s) 1993-A SPECIALTY GUIDELINE MANAGEMENT XELODA (capecitabine) POLICY I. INDICATIONS The indications below including FDA-approved indications and compendial uses are considered a covered benefit provided that all the approval criteria are met and the member has no exclusions to the prescribed therapy. A. FDA-Approved Indications 1. Colorectal Cancer a. Xeloda is indicated as a single agent for adjuvant treatment in patients with Dukes’ C colon cancer who have undergone complete resection of the primary tumor when treatment with fluoropyrimidine therapy alone is preferred. b. Xeloda is indicated as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma when treatment with fluoropyrimidine therapy alone is preferred. 2. Breast Cancer a. Xeloda in combination with docetaxel is indicated for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer after failure of prior anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. b. Xeloda monotherapy is also indicated for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer resistant to both paclitaxel and an anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimen or resistant to paclitaxel and for whom further anthracycline therapy is not indicated, for example, patients who have received cumulative doses of 400 mg/m2 of doxorubicin or doxorubicin equivalents. B. Compendial Uses 1. Anal cancer 2. Breast cancer 3. Central nervous system (CNS) metastases from breast cancer 4. Colorectal Cancer 5. Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer 6. Gastric cancer 7. Head and neck cancer 8. Hepatobiliary cancers (extra-/intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer) 9. Occult primary tumors (cancer of unknown primary) 10. Ovarian cancer (Epithelial ovarian cancer/fallopian tube cancer/primary peritoneal cancer/mucinous cancer) 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Mutations of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, EGFR, and PIK3CA Genes in Urachal Carcinoma: Occurence and Prognostic Significance
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Jagiellonian Univeristy Repository www.impactjournals.com/oncotarget/ Oncotarget, Vol. 7, No. 26 Research Paper: Pathology Mutations of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, EGFR, and PIK3CA genes in urachal carcinoma: Occurence and prognostic significance Orsolya Módos1, Henning Reis2, Christian Niedworok3, Herbert Rübben3, Attila Szendröi1, Marcell A. Szász4, József Tímár4, Kornélia Baghy5, Ilona Kovalszky5, Tomasz Golabek6, Piotr Chlosta6, Krzysztof Okon7, Benoit Peyronnet8, Romain Mathieu8, Shahrokh F. Shariat9, Péter Hollósi5,10, Péter Nyirády1 and Tibor Szarvas1,3 1 Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary 2 Institute of Pathology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany 3 Department of Urology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany 4 2nd Department of Pathology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary 5 1st Department of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary 6 Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland 7 Department of Pathomorphology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland 8 Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France 9 Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria 10 Tumor Progression Research Group, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary Correspondence to: Tibor Szarvas, email: [email protected] Keywords: urachal carcinoma, urachal cancer, urachus, mutation, EGFR, Pathology Section Received: April 08, 2016 Accepted: May 29, 2016 Published: June 05, 2016 ABSTRACT Purpose: Targeted therapy represents an attractive alternative for rare tumors such as urachal carcinoma (UrC). The aim of this study was to assess the mutations of the most commonly affected 5 genes in the targetable EGFR-pathway in UrC and comapre their frequencies to those of found in urothelial and colorectal cancer.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanisms of High-Grade Serous Carcinogenesis in the Fallopian Tube and Ovary: Current Hypotheses, Etiologic Factors, and Molecular Alterations
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Mechanisms of High-Grade Serous Carcinogenesis in the Fallopian Tube and Ovary: Current Hypotheses, Etiologic Factors, and Molecular Alterations Isao Otsuka Kameda Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kamogawa 296-8602, Japan; [email protected] Abstract: Ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) are a heterogeneous group of diseases. They include fallopian-tube-epithelium (FTE)-derived and ovarian-surface-epithelium (OSE)-derived tumors. The risk/protective factors suggest that the etiology of HGSCs is multifactorial. Inflammation caused by ovulation and retrograde bleeding may play a major role. HGSCs are among the most genetically altered cancers, and TP53 mutations are ubiquitous. Key driving events other than TP53 mutations include homologous recombination (HR) deficiency, such as BRCA 1/2 dysfunction, and activation of the CCNE1 pathway. HR deficiency and the CCNE1 amplification appear to be mutually exclusive. Intratumor heterogeneity resulting from genomic instability can be observed at the early stage of tumorigenesis. In this review, I discuss current carcinogenic hypotheses, sites of origin, etiologic factors, and molecular alterations of HGSCs. Keywords: ovarian cancer; high-grade serous carcinoma; carcinogenesis; molecular alterations Citation: Otsuka, I. Mechanisms of High-Grade Serous Carcinogenesis in the Fallopian Tube and Ovary: Current Hypotheses, Etiologic 1. Introduction Factors, and Molecular Alterations. Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecological malignancy. Epithelial ovarian cancers Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4409. (EOCs) are a heterogeneous group of diseases and can be divided into five main types, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms based on histopathology and molecular genetics [1]: high-grade serous, low-grade serous, 22094409 endometrioid, clear cell, and mucinous tumors.
    [Show full text]
  • UEMS 2020.11 Syllabus of the ETR in Rare Adult Cancers
    UNION EUROPÉENNE DES MÉDECINS SPÉCIALISTES EUROPEAN UNION OF MEDICAL SPECIALISTS Association internationale sans but lucratif International non-profit organisation RUE DE L’INDUSTRIE, 24 T +32 2 649 51 64 BE- 1040 BRUSSELS F +32 2 640 37 30 www.uems.eu [email protected] UEMS 2020.11 Syllabus for residents and trainees in Rare Adult Solid Cancers The basic goal of this syllabus is to provide an understanding between the instructor and trainee so there is minimal confusion in the topics, with clear expectations. It is not a classical syllabus as it contains descriptions from different areas, but it still summarizes major and specific topics that should be covered during the training course of a resident. This syllabus is intended as supporting reference material, and the precise content and priorities of training may vary in different training institutions. The syllabus can also be modified to reflect each instructor's teaching philosophy towards the trainees. 1. There are scientific publications, web pages, and conference materials available online that could be used for educational purposes for various types of rare adult solid cancers. This is a comprehensive summary of them. 2. There are significant differences in the number of available scientific publications and reviews for different rare adult solid cancers. Some, like sarcomas, have a very robust literature, while others have been sparsely researched and consequently the availability of study materials is quite poor. 3. These differences also apply to life events and natural history. In the list of the EU CE accredited events there is a strong underrepresentation for some types of rare adult solid cancers.
    [Show full text]
  • Ct Findings of Hypervascular Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma
    Compurerized Radial. Vol. I I, No. 2, pp. 91-94, 1987 0730-4862/87 53.00 + 0.00 Printed in the U.S.A. All rights reserved Copyright 8 1987 Pergamon Journals Ltd CT FINDINGS OF HYPERVASCULAR MALIGNANT PERITONEAL MESOTHELIOMA DEBORAH S. GRANKE,* JAMES H. ELLIS and BRUCE D. RICHMOND Radiology Service (114) Veterans Administration Medical Center and Department of Radiology. University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48105. U.S.A. (Received 19 June 1986; in revised form 21 October 1986; received for publicatiorr 6 November 1986) Abstract-A case of peritoneal mesothelioma is presented in which CT demonstrated abnormal regions of increased vascularity in the omentum corresponding to hypervascular omental lesions shown by angiography. This CT appearance has not been described in prior reports of CT in peritoneal mesothelioma. Mesothelioma. peritoneal Angiography Computed tomography INTRODUCTION Reports of computed tomography (CT) in mesothelioma describe peritoneal involvement that may be extensive, with confluent tumor in layers, masses, and/or nodules and mesenteric infiltration [l, 21. A recent report of anteriography in peritoneal mesothelioma described three cases of mildly to moderately hypervascular omental lesions without arteriovenous shunting; however, the one CT scan performed was nondiagnostic [3]. We report a case of peritoneal mesothelioma where CT demon- strated abnormal regions of increased vascularity in the omentum corresponding to the hypervascular omental lesions shown by angiography. CASE REPORT A 54-year-old white male presented with a 3-month history of insidious onset of diffuse abdominal tenderness, early satiety, abdominal bloating, and crampy abdominal pain. His physical exam was unremarkable, and routine laboratory tests, sigmoidoscopy, and barium enema were normal.
    [Show full text]
  • Antitumor Activity of Mir-34A in Peritoneal Mesothelioma Relies on C-MET and AXL Inhibition
    El Bezawy et al. Journal of Hematology & Oncology (2017) 10:19 DOI 10.1186/s13045-016-0387-6 RESEARCH Open Access Antitumor activity of miR-34a in peritoneal mesothelioma relies on c-MET and AXL inhibition: persistent activation of ERK and AKT signaling as a possible cytoprotective mechanism Rihan El Bezawy1, Michelandrea De Cesare1, Marzia Pennati1, Marcello Deraco2, Paolo Gandellini1, Valentina Zuco1*† and Nadia Zaffaroni1*† Abstract Background: The value of microRNAs (miRNAs) as novel targets for cancer therapy is now widely recognized. However, no information is currently available on the expression/functional role of miRNAs in diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM), a rapidly lethal disease, poorly responsive to conventional treatments, for which the development of new therapeutic strategies is urgently needed. Here, we evaluated the expression and biological effects of miR-34a—one of the most widely deregulated miRNAs in cancer and for which a lipid-formulated mimic is already clinically available—in a large cohort of DMPM clinical samples and a unique collection of in house-developed preclinical models, with the aim to assess the potential of a miR-34a-based approach for disease treatment. Methods: miR-34a expression was determined by qRT-PCR in 45 DMPM and 7 normal peritoneum specimens as well as in 5 DMPM cell lines. Following transfection with miR-34a mimic, the effects on DMPM cell phenotype, in terms of proliferative potential, apoptotic rate, invasion ability, and cell cycle distribution, were assessed. In addition, three subcutaneous and orthotopic DMPM xenograft models were used to examine the effect of miR-34a on tumorigenicity. The expression of miRNA targets and the activation status of relevant pathways were investigated by western blot.
    [Show full text]
  • XELODA (Capecitabine)
    Reference number(s) 1993-A SPECIALTY GUIDELINE MANAGEMENT XELODA (capecitabine) POLICY I. INDICATIONS The indications below including FDA-approved indications and compendial uses are considered a covered benefit provided that all the approval criteria are met and the member has no exclusions to the prescribed therapy. A. FDA-Approved Indications 1. Colorectal Cancer a. Xeloda is indicated as a single agent for adjuvant treatment in patients with Dukes’ C colon cancer who have undergone complete resection of the primary tumor when treatment with fluoropyrimidine therapy alone is preferred. b. Xeloda is indicated as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma when treatment with fluoropyrimidine therapy alone is preferred. 2. Breast Cancer a. Xeloda in combination with docetaxel is indicated for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer after failure of prior anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. b. Xeloda monotherapy is also indicated for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer resistant to both paclitaxel and an anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimen or resistant to paclitaxel and for whom further anthracycline therapy is not indicated, for example, patients who have received cumulative doses of 400 mg/m2 of doxorubicin or doxorubicin equivalents. B. Compendial Uses 1. Anal cancer 2. Breast cancer 3. Central nervous system (CNS) metastases from breast cancer 4. Colorectal Cancer 5. Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer 6. Gastric cancer 7. Head and neck cancers (including very advanced head and neck cancer) 8. Hepatobiliary cancers (including extrahepatic and intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer) 9. Occult primary tumors (cancer of unknown primary) 10. Ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, and primary peritoneal cancer: Epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, primary peritoneal cancer, and mucinous cancer) 11.
    [Show full text]