arXiv:0709.0302v1 [astro-ph] 3 Sep 2007 n ro,M,414 USA 48104, MI, Arbor, Ann USA as(..Mcayne l 01.Sc aeilcudslow could material Such some 2001). of envelope al. an et MacFadyen within observational erupting (e.g. the engine mass GRB consider CCSNe a to of of natural continuum nature is the it and types, Ic after- th SNe spectral Given of to 2003). GRBs spectra al. et of the 1999; (Stanek connection in burst the al. emerge after et weeks that (Bloom 1-2 glows f Ic bumps spectral curves SNe broad as as resembling revealingly light more tures appear or 2001), afterglow These al. et optical Lazzati features. the SN in exhibit to observed (II-IIb-Ib-Ic). explaine masses types may envelope decreasing spectral CCSNe of different class). terms the Ic in with Type lack continuum the which (unlike a lines Ib, span Type He a show characterist some- but resemble spectral is H to its 1993J II-like as Type SN IIb” from “Type evolved plateau). a as a classified times photo- (i.e. slow phase a exhibiting evolution events metric rich (2) hydrogen Type “normal” (3) spectra, are and their curves, P in light declining lines linearly have emission II-L grou narrow Type three (Filippenko show into otherwise IIn partitioned Type been II (1) has Type class and latter The spectra core- 1997). their in to lines attributed gen are SNe bright a (CCSNe). et explosions remaining (Smith induced instability collapse The pair by triggered 2006). a of tion tdwt h yeI ls,wihaetogtt involve to SNe thought brightest are magnitudes the however, absolute which with ; (those class, dwarf white Ia of Type explosions the with ated N20g,i huh ob nepoino supermassive a of explosion an be ( to thought is 2006gy, SN ihtedah fsasta ei hi ie ihmi se- main with lives their begin that stars masses quence of deaths the with 4 2 3 1 occasionally are (GRBs) bursts gamma-ray Duration Long hydro- strong lack they if Ib/c Type as classified are CCSNe uiossproa Se r otcmol associ- commonly most are (SNe) supernovae Luminous rpittpstuigL using typeset Preprint D eateto hsc,FoiaSaeUiest,Tallahas University, State Florida Physics, of Department ATVERSION RAFT hsc iiin BL ylto od ekly A9472 CA Berkeley, Road, Cyclotron 1 LBNL, Division, Physics eateto srnm,Uiest fTxs utn X78 TX Austin, Texas, of University Astronomy, of Department nvriyo ihgn 47RnalLbrtr,40Churc 450 Laboratory, Randall 2477 Michigan, of University M R OBERT ms ujc headings: from Subject expected envelope. be H/He may a in as encased interaction strong a from luminosity eoiyof velocity lwpooerceouin h ih uv fS 05pind e 2005ap distinct the SN lack 2 of also spectra curve The decay. light rapid relatively the evolution, photometric slow ra -yn etrscrepnigt H to corresponding features P-Cygni Broad eoead6dy fe aiu ih hwnro msinli emission of narrow redshift show a light at identified maximum lines yet after absorption supernova days luminous 6 most and the before of Keck and HET the ∼ , 0 ms km 000 epeetufitrdpooercosrain ihROTSE- with observations photometric unfiltered present We 100 .Q M. M − N 150 ms A OVEMBER UIMBY T E − ∼ tl mltajv 03/07/07 v. emulateapj style X > 1 1. M amrlnsse nS 06yadS 06f ebifl discu briefly We 2006tf. SN and 2006gy SN in seen lines Balmer ) 20 7 ⊙ INTRODUCTION − n tmyrpeettefis detec- first the represent may it and ) 1 , G , 0 ms km 000 8 ,2018 4, uenve N2005ap SN Supernovae, M REG ⊙ h urn eodholder, record current The . M A − LDERING < 1 nieohrhgl uiossproa uha 06yand 2006gy as such supernovae luminous highly other Unlike . N20A:AMS RLIN EXPLOSION BRILLIANT MOST A 2005AP: SN − 0 r l associated all are 20) z 0 = 2 .C J. , . 82 hc ustepa nlee antd at magnitude unfiltered peak the puts which 2832, e,F 32312, FL see, RAIG rf eso oebr4 2018 4, November version Draft α 1,USA 712, Street, h C , ,USA 0, W sig- ABSTRACT HEELER ea- ps: ics III II- l. d e N , III iso ek rmmdrtl raee (FWHM broadened moderately from peaks mission 1 P , V n O and , in pia oreta ekda about at peaked that source optical sient group. II-L Type t the of curves within light subclass the bright explain possibil can this that explored models have constructed (2005) proge and al. stripped et Young their bea- cousins. unlike tor gamma-ray creation, the their mask announcing thus con and flow ultra-relativistic the a hdlgto nrypouto ehnssi cosmic in mechanisms production and energy identified explosions. ever on in supernova light conclusions brightest shed and the may is discussion and 2005ap offer observations SN we spectral §4. and the §3, §2, in in modeling photometry the present ae ihte0 the with taken ooyPoet(elutre l 99.S 05pi lo- is 2005ap SN 1999). at al. of et cated Cos- version (Perlmutter Supernova modified the Project a by mology developed Clus- via code sources subtraction Coma static image the the of on removal the 2005ap centered after of SN field ter used course a are 2006). in the identified Quimby dates in was (TSS; taken (UT The Search images 3 Supernova in Texas March Texas. letter) 2005 west this on in throughout found observatory was McDonald i transient the which 2003), at al. et located (Akerlof telescope Experiment) Search nFg ) oee,Aaie l 20)hv aaoe a cataloged have (2006) al. et Adami 0 however, source 1); Fig. in A s6 is oto N20a.S 05prahda nlee mag- unfiltered an values reached R2 2005ap 18 SN of nitude 2005ap. SN of host in hw aiu ih curdo 05Mrh10.6. March 2005 on occurred light maximum shows tions in a eetdoe 0dypro,adi a since has magnitudes the it limiting by and with observations 18 nights period, of (170 day tran- years telescopes The 40 two ROTSE-III over a 2). undetected over Fig. remained detected (see was nights two sient following the brightness 5 ETER 23 = nti etrw eottedsoeyo N20a,atran- a 2005ap, SN of discovery the report we letter this In N20a a icvrdo nlee pia images optical unfiltered on discovered was 2005ap SN < http://www.nofs.navy.mil/data/fchpix/ . 2 arisaiiyeuto raGBlk engine GRB-like a or eruption instability pair a ′′ M ctsa13we iet ekfloe ya by followed peak to rise week 1-3 a icates . e lkl rgntn ntedafhs)and host) dwarf the in originating (likely nes I n pia pcrsoi olwu with follow-up spectroscopic optical and III N20a.Tesetatknaot3days 3 about taken spectra The 2005ap. SN , 9 H rjce rmSS 101.2242. (galaxy J130115.12+274327.5 SDSS from projected lim III . α ± 6 ÖFLICH 5 r ute eetdwt photospheric a with detected further are , ′′ 13 = < nMrh1.8adwsosre tasimilar a at observed was and 10.28 March on ) 0 ± . . ,and 2, 19 13 0 h . . . 3 3 01 45 ± ) 4 A 5). C , ′′ m 0 m eto h rnin with transient the of west R ARL steoii fteextraordinary the of origin the ss 14 . 8(airtdaantteUSNO-B1.0 the against (calibrated 08 OS-Ib(ooi pia Transient Optical (Robotic ROTSE-IIIb 23 = 2. . s 83, .A W. th PHOTOMETRY . 5 re oyoilfi otedetec- the to fit polynomial order δ ± KERLOF = − 0 + . 22 ,adw dniyti sthe as this identify we and 3, 27 . 06fta show that 2006tf 7 ◦ 43 ± 4 E , ′ 0 − 32 . LI 22 absolute. 1 . ′′ .R S. . J00,which (J2000), 3 antd.We magnitude. 7 B YKOFF 24 = ∼ . 6 4 ± 0 ni- ity . he 2, s 2 Quimby et al.

18.0

18.5

19.0 Magnitude 19.5

20.0 FIG. 1.— SDSS reference image (left) and HET/LRS acquisition image of SN 2005ap (right). The SDSS image is a combination of the g-, r-, and i-band SS frames taken 80 days before maximum light. The host is not clearly detected 20.5 on the combined SDSS frame, but four neighboring are labeled A-D. −50 0 50 100 The SN is marked on the HET/LRS image. Days After 2005 Mar 10.6

SN 2005ap brightened over at least a 7 day period to reach its FIG. 2.— ROTSE-III unfiltered of SN 2005ap calibrated against peak. The shape of the light curve is consistent with super- the USNO-B1.0 R2 magnitudes. Detections are indicated by filled circles. Upper limits fainter than 18.5 mag prior to discovery and 19.0 after the last templates that take ∼ 3 weeks to reach maximum light. detection are marked with arrows. The red dashed line depicts the V-band light curve of a SN II-L (SN 1980K [Barbon et al. 1982; Buta 1982]) dilated 3. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL FITTING in time by 1+z and arbitrarily shifted by 4 magnitudes to match the peak. The dotted blue line is the unfiltered light curve of SN 2006gy from Smith et al. A spectrum of SN 2005ap acquired 2005 March 7 with (2006), corrected for its 1.68 magnitudes of extinction and phased to match the Low Resolution Spectrograph (LRS; Hill et al. 1998) the peak of SN 2005ap, as it would appear at a redshift of z = 0.2832. The on the Hobby-Eberly Telescope (HET) shows a very blue HET and Keck spectral epochs are each marked along the abscissa with an continuum with subtle line features including broad ab- “S.” sorption and at least one narrow emission line (Fig. 3). length implies a 16,000 to 20,000K source. Alternatively, β Keck/LRIS (Oke et al. 1995) data obtained 9 days later ex- the continuum may be a power-law, fν ∝ ν , with β ∼ 0.7. hibit similar behavior, and additionally show narrow absorp- We paid special attention to the extraction of the blue channel tion lines at wavelengths not covered by the HET. We identify Keck data. The rollover at the blue end cannot signal a black the narrow emission lines observed around 6363 and 6425Å body peak within the allowed temperature range. The spectra as [O III] λ4959,5007, and a narrow emission line around are modeled as 20,000K and 17,000K black body continua 8422Å in the Keck spectrum as Hα. The narrow absorp- for the March 7 and 16 data, respectively, with superposed P-Cygni profiles. tion doublet seen at 3595Å corresponds to Mg II λ2796,2803 in this same frame, and sets a firm lower limit for the red- Thelack of distinct featuresin the 4500to 8000Å rangeim- shift of SN 2005ap at z =0.2832. At this redshift, the peak poses significant constraints on the cause of the broad absorp- unfiltered magnitude is −22.7 ± 0.1 absolute (Ωm = 0.265, tion features between rest 3500 and 4500Å. We obtain accept- −1 −1 ΩΛ =0.735, H0 = 71kms Mpc ). Corrections for minor able fits to both spectral epochs from SYNOW using only H I, m (AR =0.022 ) Galactic extinction (Schlegel et al. 1998) and C III,N III,andO III (coloredlines in Fig. 3). He II may also be absorption within the host are not included. present, but its strongest feature is blended with C III/N III and The alignment of the slit for the HET data includes the is not strictly required. The presence of such high excitation southern edge of galaxy B, which is 25.7′′ from the SN species is consistent with the high temperaturesimplied by the (Fig. 1). These spectra indicate that the redshift of galaxy blue continuum slope. SYNOW indicates the C III feature at B is consistent with the Mg II absorption doublet at 3525Å about 2600Å is temperature dependent, and C III can accept- (z ∼ 0.26; projected separation ∼ 100kpc). The remaining ably fit the rollover at the blue end of the Keck spectrum if Mg II absorption system is consistent with the SDSS photo- the ion temperature is lowered to about 7,500 K (the apparent metric redshift of galaxy C in Figure 1, to within the uncer- inconsistency between the ion and continuum temperatures tainty (Adelman-McCarthy et al. 2007). may arise due to assumptions in the SYNOW code, which ne- A second observation was conducted with the HET on glects non-LTE effects). Between March 7 and March 16 the 2007 February 23, long after the transient had faded below lines shift redward by 50-60Å (note the HET and Keck wave- the detection limit of ROTSE-III. The slit was aligned to in- length solutions agree to ∼ 0.1%). This indicates a significant clude the position of SN 2005ap as well as galaxy A. The deceleration of the photosphere between the two epochs. The − [O III] λ4959,5007 doublet is clearly detected near the loca- SYNOW fits give a photospheric velocity of ∼23,000kms 1 − tion of the transient(Fig. 4). This may indicatethat the narrow on March 7, decreasing to ∼19,000kms 1 on March 16. emission lines are not directly associated with SN 2005ap, but rather are intrinsic to the faint host, which has an absolute 4. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS magnitude, MR, of about -16.8. Like the host, galaxy A is We have presented photometric and spectroscopic observa- also redshifted by z ∼ 0.283, giving it an tions of the Type II supernova2005ap. Narrow absorption and of about MR = −20.4 and the pair a projected separation of emission lines from within the dwarf host indicate a redshift 28.3Kpc. of z =0.2832. The successful SYNOW fits and the lack of ad- We used the parameterized spectral synthesis code, ditional narrow absorption systems indicate the SN cannot be SYNOW (Jeffery & Branch 1990), to identify broad features far beyond this redshift. Correcting only for distance, the peak in the spectra of SN 2005ap. First we note that if the contin- unfiltered magnitude was −22.7 ± 0.1 absolute, which corre- uum is a black body, then the steep dependence with wave- sponds to ∼ 4 × 1044 erg s−1 assuming no bolometric correc- SN 2005ap 3

16 16

12 O II O III Hα 12

10.0 8 8 Galaxy A O III 5007 4 4

0 Host 0

Offset (arcsec) Hα 4 4

8 HET (2007 Feb 23) 8

5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 0.5 1.0 −1000 −500 0 500 1000 Observed Wavelength (Å) Flux Velocity (km s−1) FIG. 4.— HET/LRS spectra taken about two years after SN 2005ap faded below the detection limit of ROTSE-III. The slit was oriented to include the

λ location of the SN as well as galaxy A. The narrow [O III] λ4959,5007 dou- HET (March 7) blet redshifted by z = 0.283 is still clearly present (larger blue circle), suggest- 1.0 [O III] ing this emission was not associated with SN 2005ap. Galaxy A also exhibits Scaled F the [O III] doublet as well as [O III] λ3727 (red circles). Hα is detected in both galaxies, although it is confused with the imperfectly subtracted night sky lines. In addition to the narrow emission lines, the host is detected as a weak continuum source. The integrated light is plotted in the right panel. Note the host emission is distinct from galaxy A.

itous Source Catalogue6, nor is there a cataloged radio source

present in either the NRAO VLA Sky Survey (Condon et al. 1998) or the FIRST survey catalog (White et al. 1997). Sec- C B A ond, the spectra are quite different from normal AGN, show- 0.1 3450 3500 3550 3600 Keck (March 16) ingnoHβ orMg II emission features. There is some similarity Observed Wavelength (Å) to the featureless spectra of certain blazars, although blazars lack P-Cygni line profiles and often show narrow lines from 1.00 0.90 giant elliptical hosts (Wurtz et al. 1996). Third, the best po- H 0.80 sition for SN 2005ap is offset from its host at the 2 σ level,

1.20 and at peak the transient was more than 5 magnitudes brighter 0.80

0.40 C III than the underlying host light. Finally, no repeat outbursts

have been detected at this location in two years of monitor- 1.05 1.00 ing. 0.95 0.90 N III 0.85 The host galaxy is reminiscent of settings for long dura- 1.10 1.00 tion GRBs (Fruchter et al. 2006); however, the observed pop- 0.90 0.80 O III ulation of GRB afterglows typically decline as power-laws

0.70 ( f ∝ tα with α ∼ −1), and the 1-3 week rise and slow fad- 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Rest Wavelength (Å) ing of SN 2005ap are inconsistent with this trend. An off-axis orphan afterglow is a interesting possibility, although current FIG. 3.— HET/LRS spectrum of SN 2005ap taken 3 days before maximum models predict a rapid power-law decline after maximum light light (black curve) and the Keck/LRIS data from 6 days after maximum light with α ∼ −1.5 (Nakar & Piran 2003), which does not appear (grey curve). The blue and red curves show spectral fits to the data from the to match the observations. highly parameterized SYNOW code. An unidentified P-Cygni profile is seen Except for its unusually bright peak magnitude, the ob- around 3200 Å. The left inset is a detail from the Keck spectra showing three narrow absorption doublets that we identify as intervening Mg II λ2796,2804 servations of SN 2005ap are quite consistent with the typi- systems. The upper inset shows the narrow Hα and [O III] λ5007 from the cal behavior of supernovae. The time scales for the photo- Keck data plotted in velocity space relative to the z = 0.2832 restframe. The metric evolution are common among SNe, as is the presence bottom panels show the individual contributions from the four ions included of broad, P-Cygni profiles in the spectra. There have been in the fits. SNe with continua slopes about as blue as SN 2005ap (e.g. SN 1998S; Fassia et al. 2001), but the existence of C III,N III, and O III features is unprecedented. The broad Hα P-Cygni tion. We consider below the possibility that SN 2005ap was profile is of course the defining feature of SNe II. With no nar- an AGN or a GRB afterglow, but we find it is most consistent row emission lines clearly associated with the explosion and with a supernova explosion. We conclude SN 2005ap is the lacking an observed photometric plateau phase, SN 2005ap most luminous supernova ever identified, and roughly twice could be classified as a Type II-L. The light curve is similar as bright as the previous record holder, SN 2006gy. in shape to the behavior of SNe II-L (Fig. 2) although it is Although the peak absolute magnitude of SN 2005ap is 3-4 mag too bright. The spectra are also roughly similar to comfortably in the range −21 > M > −23 typical of X-ray se- the early observations of SN 1979C (Branch et al. 1981), ex- lected AGN around this redshift (Anderson et al. 2007), this cept SN 2005ap shows a much bluer continuum. However, interpretation is unlikely. First and foremost, this transient oc- SNe II-L show broad, asymmetric Hα emission with little to curred in a region of the sky that has been exceptionally well no blueshifted absorption, and they also have Hβ, Hγ, and observed across the electromagnetic spectrum for decades; no He I/Na I P-Cygni profiles. These characteristics are want- indication of a possible AGN at this position has previously ing in the observations of SN 2005ap. While most SNe II-L been uncovered. Specifically, there are no X-ray detections have narrowly distributed peak magnitudes, a small subsam- identified in either the ROSAT All-Sky Survey source cata- logs (Voges et al. 1999, 2000) or the XMM-Newton Serendip- 6 http://xcatdb.u-strasbg.fr/xcatdb-corr/ 4 Quimby et al. ple (including SN 1979C) deviate to brighter values (Gaskell netar to produce a high intrinsic luminosity and subsequent 1992). Young et al. (2005) have suggested these deviants are decline from the second peak of SN 2005bf. It is possible that powered by a GRB engine within a H/He envelope. an appropriate choice of (ad hoc) parameters could produce The luminosity of normal SNe II is powered by energy de- the peak we observe in SN 2005ap, but with a smaller mass posited by the explosionshock, but this requires that the initial and larger temporal decay index to account for the brighter, radius of the progenitor be significant compared to the radius faster peak. of the photosphere in order to minimize adiabatic losses. For In two years of operation, the has an exceptionally bright object like SN 2005ap, this would re- uncovered the most luminous supernova (this work), the sec- quire an unrealistically large radius. With a photosphere mov- ondmost luminous(SN 2006gy[Smith et al.2006; Ofek et al. −1 ing ataboutvph ∼ 20,000kms and a time of maximum light 2007]), and a third, highly luminous event (SN 2006tf 6 of tmax ∼ 1 × 10 s, the radius of the photosphere near maxi- [Quimby et al. 2007]). The volume monitored over this time 15 mum light is Rph ∼ 2 × 10 cm, which is much too large to (roughly matching the total from all past narrow-field CCD correspond to a standard red supergiant. surveys targeting known galaxies), the high completeness of If the luminosity arises in the collision of the ejecta with the sample resulting from a tight (nightly) cadence and abil- a surrounding, perhaps dense, shell of circumstellar matter ity to work in the cores of galaxies, along with prompt high shed by a wind or a process like an LBV mass ejection, then S/N spectroscopic follow-up, have been key to finding and we might see the radiation emitted by a shocked, thermalized, fully classifying these events. The lack of SN 2005ap-like shell. For a shell of mass Msh, radius R, thickness ∆R, and events reported in previous surveys may suggest they are in- optical depth, τ, maximum light will occur when the diffu- trinsically rare, but the lack of SN 2006gy-like events might sion time, tdif f ∼ 3∆Rτ/c, is comparable to the dynamical be understood if they are preferentially located in the cores time, tdyn ∼ ∆R/vph. This gives the optical depth at maxi- of bright galaxies. Our discovery of new classes of bright mum light, τmax ∼ 1/3(c/vph)∼ 5 neglecting any differences transients bodes well for more extensive future surveys of the between the photospheric velocity and the mean ejecta veloc- time-variable sky. 2 ity. Since Msh ∼ 4π R τmax/κ, the mass of the shell would be about 1.3M⊙, with κ =0.2 for electron scattering. The peak ∼ 2 ∼ × 45 −1 luminosity would be L 1/2Msh vph/tmax 2 10 erg s , more than directly observed, but roughly consistent with the We would like to thank the staff of the Hobby-Eberly Tele- observations. The model for SNe II-L by Young et al. (2005) scope and McDonald Observatory for their support. We give is a variation on this theme, but with the optical luminosity specific thanks to V. Riley and B. Roman for their obser- produced by non-thermal emission from the afterglow pro- vations with the HET, and to F. Castro, P. Mondol, and M. cess. Sellers for their efforts in screening potential SN candidates. Another possibility is that a separate internal source of We thank M. Kowalski and D. Schlegel for their assistance energy powers the luminosity. A model driven purely by with the Keck observations, and D. Branch and J. Parrent radioactive decay would require a large asymmetry to pre- for discussions on the SYNOW code. This research is sup- vent the nickel mass (10’s of M⊙) from exceeding the ejecta ported, in part, by NASA grant NAG 5-7937(PH), NSF grants mass (Höflich et al. 1999) , which must be modest to account AST0307312(PH) and AST0406740 (RQ & JCW), and DOE for the rapid rise and decline of the light curve. Whether this contract DE-AC02-05CH11231 (GA). The authors wish to could be accomplished with a large nickel mass suggesting a recognize and acknowledge the very significant cultural role pair formation event, or with a lower nickel mass more com- and reverence that the summit of Mauna Kea has always had mensurate with a “normal" core collapse explosion requires within the indigenous Hawaiian community. We are most for- more extended analysis. tunate to have the opportunity to conduct observations from Maeda et al. (2007) propose the rapid spin-down of a mag- this mountain.

REFERENCES Adami, C., Picat, J. P., Savine, C., et al. 2006, A&A, 451, 1159 MacFadyen, A. I., Woosley, S. E., & Heger, A. 2001, ApJ, 550, 410 Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Agueros, M. A., Allam, S. S., et al. 2007, in press Maeda, K., Tanaka, M., Nomoto, K., et al. 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 705 Akerlof, C. W., Kehoe, R. L., McKay, T. A., et al. 2003, PASP, 115, 132 Nakar, E. & Piran, T. 2003, New Astronomy, 8, 141 Anderson, S. F., Margon, B., Voges, W., et al. 2007, AJ, 133, 313 Ofek, E. O., Cameron, P. B., Kasliwal, M. M., et al. 2007, ApJ, 659, L13 Barbon, R., Ciatti, F., & Rosino, L. 1982, A&A, 116, 35 Oke, J. B., Cohen, J. G., Carr, M., et al. 1995, PASP, 107, 375 Bloom, J. S., Kulkarni, S. R., Djorgovski, S. G., et al. 1999, Nature, 401, 453 Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Goldhaber, G., et al. 1999, ApJ, 517, 565 Branch, D., Falk, S. W., Uomoto, A. K., et al. 1981, ApJ, 244, 780 Quimby, R., Castro, F., & Mondol, P. 2007, IAU Circ., 8790, 2 Buta, R. J. 1982, PASP, 94, 578 Quimby, R. M. 2006, PhD thesis, University of Texas, United States – Texas Condon, J. J., Cotton, W. D., Greisen, E. W., et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 1693 Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525 Fassia, A., Meikle, W. P. S., Chugai, N., et al. 2001, MNRAS, 325, 907 Smith, N., Li, W., Foley, R. J., et al. 2006, ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints Filippenko, A. V. 1997, ARA&A, 35, 309 Stanek, K. Z., Matheson, T., Garnavich, P. M., et al. 2003, ApJ, 591, L17 Fruchter, A. S., Levan, A. J., Strolger, L., et al. 2006, Nature, 441, 463 Voges, W., Aschenbach, B., Boller, T., et al. 1999, A&A, 349, 389 Gaskell, C. M. 1992, ApJ, 389, L17 —. 2000, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 9029, 0 Hill, G. J., Nicklas, H. E., MacQueen, P. J., et al. 1998, in Proc. SPIE White, R. L., Becker, R. H., Helfand, D. J., & Gregg, M. D. 1997, ApJ, 475, Vol. 3355, p. 375-386, Optical Astronomical Instrumentation, Sandro 479 D’Odorico; Ed., 375–386 Wurtz, R., Stocke, J. T., & Yee, H. K. C. 1996, ApJS, 103, 109 Höflich, P., Wheeler, J. C., & Wang, L. 1999, ApJ, 521, 179 Young, T. R., Smith, D., & Johnson, T. A. 2005, ApJ, 625, L87 Jeffery, D. J. & Branch, D. 1990, in Supernovae, Jerusalem Winter School for Theoretical Physics, ed. J. C. Wheeler, T. Piran, & S. Weinberg, 149–+ Lazzati, D., Covino, S., Ghisellini, G., et al. 2001, A&A, 378, 996