DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Environmental Assessment, Palmer Exploration Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Environmental Assessment, Palmer Exploration Project DRAFT Environmental Assessment Palmer Exploration Project Constantine North, Inc. Case File: AA-094088 DOI-BLM-AK-A020-2016-006-EA Glennallen, Alaska April 25, 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Glennallen Field Office P.O. Box 147 Milepost 186.5 Glenn Highway Glennallen, Alaska 99588 Palmer Exploration Project | Draft Environmental Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Glennallen Field Office P.O. Box 147 Milepost 186.5 Glenn Highway Glennallen, Alaska 99588 Palmer Exploration Project Environmental Assessment, DOI-BLM-AK-A020-2016-0006-EA Case File: AA-094088 Applicant: Constantine North, Inc. Table of Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Summary of Proposed Project .................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Background............................................................................................................... 1-7 1.3 Purpose and Need .................................................................................................... 1-7 1.4 Land Use Plan Conformance .................................................................................... 1-8 1.4.1 Bureau of Land Management - Ring of Fire Management Plan .......................... 1-8 1.4.2 Haines Borough Comprehensive Plan ............................................................. 1-13 1.4.3 Haines State Forest Management Plan............................................................ 1-13 1.5 Other Applicable Laws, Regulations, and Policies .................................................. 1-14 1.6 Summary of Public Involvement .............................................................................. 1-14 1.7 Issues Identified/Issues Eliminated from Further Analysis ....................................... 1-15 2 Alternatives .................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Alternative 1 - No Action Alternative .......................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Alternative 2 - Proposed Action Alternative ............................................................... 2-4 2.2.1 Personnel .......................................................................................................... 2-8 2.2.2 Equipment ......................................................................................................... 2-8 2.2.3 Gravel and Rock Infrastructure .......................................................................... 2-9 2.2.4 Drill Sites and Drilling Operations ..................................................................... 2-16 2.2.5 Water Management ......................................................................................... 2-22 2.2.6 Solid and Septic Waste .................................................................................... 2-24 2.2.7 Hazardous Materials ........................................................................................ 2-24 2.2.8 Reclamation ..................................................................................................... 2-25 2.2.9 Post-closure Management ............................................................................... 2-27 2.2.10 Schedule .......................................................................................................... 2-27 2.2.11 Applicant-Committed Environmental Protection Measures ............................... 2-28 2.2.12 Use and Occupancy Under the Mining Laws.................................................... 2-31 2.3 Alternatives Considered But Not Analyzed in Detail ................................................ 2-31 Bureau of Land Management Glennallen Field Office, P.O. Box 147, Milepost 186.5, Glennallen, Alaska 99588 i Palmer Exploration Project | Draft Environmental Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.3.1 Unreclaimed Access Road Alternative ............................................................. 2-31 2.3.2 Existing Cat Trail Alternative ............................................................................ 2-32 2.3.3 Switchbacks Alternative ................................................................................... 2-34 3 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences ......................................... 3-1 3.1 Issue 1: Surface Water and Groundwater Resources ............................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Literature Review ............................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.2 Study Methodology ............................................................................................ 3-2 3.1.3 Affected Environment ......................................................................................... 3-2 3.1.4 Direct and Indirect Effects from Alternative 1 – No Action Alternative ................ 3-7 3.1.5 Direct and Indirect Effects from Alternative 2 – Proposed Action Alternative .... 3-10 3.1.6 Cumulative Effects ........................................................................................... 3-12 3.1.7 Recommended Mitigation ................................................................................ 3-14 3.2 Issue 2: Wetlands ................................................................................................... 3-15 3.2.1 Literature Review ............................................................................................. 3-15 3.2.2 Study Methodology .......................................................................................... 3-15 3.2.3 Affected Environment ....................................................................................... 3-18 3.2.4 Direct and Indirect Effects from Alternative 1 – No Action Alternative .............. 3-19 3.2.5 Direct and Indirect Effects from Alternative 2 – Proposed Action Alternative .... 3-19 3.2.6 Cumulative Effects ........................................................................................... 3-20 3.2.7 Recommended Mitigation ................................................................................ 3-22 3.3 Issue 3: Fisheries .................................................................................................... 3-23 3.3.1 Literature Review ............................................................................................. 3-23 3.3.2 Study Methodology .......................................................................................... 3-25 3.3.3 Affected Environment ....................................................................................... 3-27 3.3.4 Direct and Indirect Effects from Alternative 1 – No Action Alternative .............. 3-39 3.3.5 Direct and Indirect Effects from Alternative 2 – Proposed Action Alternative .... 3-41 3.3.6 Cumulative Effects ........................................................................................... 3-43 3.3.7 Recommended Mitigation ................................................................................ 3-44 3.4 Issue 4: Vegetation and Non-native Invasive Species ............................................. 3-45 3.4.1 Literature Review ............................................................................................. 3-45 3.4.2 Study Methodology .......................................................................................... 3-46 3.4.3 Affected Environment ....................................................................................... 3-47 3.4.4 Direct and Indirect Effects from Alternative 1 – No Action Alternative .............. 3-53 3.4.5 Direct and Indirect Effects from Alternative 2 – Proposed Action Alternative .... 3-54 3.4.6 Cumulative Effects ........................................................................................... 3-55 3.4.7 Recommended Mitigation ................................................................................ 3-57 3.5 Issue 5: Wildlife ....................................................................................................... 3-59 3.5.1 Literature Review ............................................................................................. 3-59 3.5.2 Study Methodology .......................................................................................... 3-60 3.5.3 Affected Environment ....................................................................................... 3-60 3.5.4 Direct and Indirect Effects from Alternative 1 – No Action Alternative .............. 3-67 3.5.5 Direct and Indirect Effects from Alternative 2 – Proposed Action Alternative .... 3-69 3.5.6 Cumulative Effects ........................................................................................... 3-74 3.5.7 Recommended Mitigation ................................................................................ 3-75 Bureau of Land Management Glennallen Field Office, P.O. Box 147, Milepost 186.5, Glennallen, Alaska 99588 ii Palmer Exploration Project | Draft Environmental Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS 3.6 Issue 6: Geology and Soil/Geologic Hazards .......................................................... 3-77 3.6.1 Literature Review ............................................................................................. 3-77 3.6.2 Study Methodology .......................................................................................... 3-78 3.6.3 Affected
Load more

Recommended publications
  • November 10, 2015 As Residents of the Eagle Vista Subdivision
    November 10, 2015 As residents of the Eagle Vista subdivision between mile 26 and 27, Haines Highway, we are vehemently opposed to the proposed establishment of a heliport in our long-established, quiet residential neighborhood. In fact, we moved from Juneau to this neighborhood specifically to move to a quieter locale, and escape the noise of helicopters and traffic in Juneau. We believe an introduction of such facilities in our established neighborhood violates the longstanding (and successfully litigated) principle of quiet enjoyment of home property. What is more, a strong majority of our neighbors feel the same way. In short, this quiet residential neighborhood was here first. The written covenants for the Eagle Vista subdivision clearly demonstrate the value that this neighborhood has always placed on its extremely quiet rural character. Inserting a heliport in our midst would be both disruptive and incompatible. There is no comparing the occasional noise of a local sawmill to that of a busy heliport operating the bulk of daylight hours during season. The expensive noise study was skewed in its parameters, methodology, and interpretation. There is no way you can mix in A-Stars taking off and landing in sequence in a narrowing, sound-amplifying valley and come up with any manner of relative quiet. We deserve protection from the incursion of helicopters taking off and landing less than a mile from our homes. We obviously moved here because we value that rural peace over convenience. As residents of the Haines Borough, we implore the planning commission to sustain our rights to quiet enjoyment of our property.
    [Show full text]
  • Haines Highway Byway Corridor Partnership Plan
    HAINES HIGHWAY CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP PLAN 1 Prepared For: The Haines Borough, as well as the village of Klukwan, and the many agencies, organizations, businesses, and citizens served by the Haines Highway. This document was prepared for local byway planning purposes and as part of the submission materials required for the National Scenic Byway designation under the National Scenic Byway Program of the Federal Highway Administration. Prepared By: Jensen Yorba Lott, Inc. Juneau, Alaska August 2007 With: Whiteman Consulting, Ltd Boulder, Colorado Cover: Haines, Alaska and the snow peaked Takhinska Mountains that rise over 6,000’ above the community 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION..............................................................5-9 2. BACKGROUND ON Byways....................................11-14 3. INSTRINSIC QUALITY REVIEW..............................15-27 4. ROAD & TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM...................29-45 5. ToURISM & Byway VISITATION...........................47-57 6. INTERPRETATION......................................................59-67 7. PURPOSE, VISION, GOALS & OBJECTIVES.......69-101 8. APPENDIX..................................................................103-105 3 4 INTRODUCTION 1 Chilkat River Valley “Valley of the Eagles” 5 The Haines Highway runs from the community byway. Obtaining national designation for the of Haines, Alaska to the Canadian-U.S. border American portion of the Haines highway should station at Dalton Cache, Alaska. At the half way be seen as the first step in the development of an point the highway passes the Indian Village of international byway. Despite the lack of a byway Klukwan. The total highway distance within Alaska program in Canada this should not prevent the is approximately 44 miles, however the Haines celebration and marketing of the entire Haines Highway continues another 106 miles through Highway as an international byway.
    [Show full text]
  • Constantine Mine Complaint
    Kenta Tsuda (Alaska Bar No. 1605046) (admission pending) Eric P. Jorgensen (Alaska Bar No. 8904010) EARTHJUSTICE 325 Fourth Street Juneau, AK 99801 T: 907.586.2751 E: [email protected] [email protected] Peter Heisler (Alaska Bar No. 1602005) (admission pending) EARTHJUSTICE 441 W 5th Avenue, Suite 301 Anchorage, AK 99501 T: 907.792.7104 E: [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiffs Chilkat Indian Village of Klukwan et al. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA CHILKAT INDIAN VILLAGE OF KLUKWAN; ) SOUTHEAST ALASKA CONSERVATION COUNCIL; ) LYNN CANAL CONSERVATION; and ) RIVERS WITHOUT BORDERS, a project of TIDES ) Case No. CENTER, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT; BRIAN STEED, in ) his official capacity as Acting Director of the Bureau of Land ) Management; KAREN MOURITSEN, in her official ) capacity as Acting Alaska State Director of the Bureau of ) Land Management; and DENNIS TEITZEL, in his official ) capacity as Field Manager of the Bureau of Land ) Management Glennallen Field Office, ) ) Defendants. ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706; 42 U.S.C. § 4332) INTRODUCTION 1. This action challenges Defendants’ approvals advancing a hardrock mine exploration project within the Chilkat River watershed northwest of Haines, Alaska. Defendants’ actions violate the National Environmental Policy Act and the Administrative Procedure Act. 2. The Chilkat watershed and its natural values are central to the livelihoods and culture of many who fish, hunt, and otherwise enjoy its natural beauty and wildlife. The watershed’s wild stocks of salmon have been, and continue to be, essential to the way of life of the Tlingit people who have resided there for millennia, and are important to commercial and recreational users in the region as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Haines Coastal Management Plan - 2007 Ii Haines Coastal Management Plan - 2007 Iii Acknowledgements
    Haines Coastal Management Program Final Plan Amendment With Assistance from Sheinberg Associates Juneau, Alaska Haines Coastal Management Plan - 2007 ii Haines Coastal Management Plan - 2007 iii Acknowledgements This plan revision and update would not have been possible without the help of many people who gave their time and expertise. Most important were the Haines Coastal District Coordinator Scott Hansen, who produced maps and provided support for meetings and guidance, Borough Manager Robert Venables, and the Haines Borough Planning Commission: Jim Stanford, Chair Harriet Brouillette Bob Cameron Rob Goldberg Lee Heinmiller Bill Stacy Lynda Walker The Haines Borough Mayor and Assembly also contributed to the development of this Plan. They were: Mike Case, Mayor Jerry Lapp, Deputy Mayor Scott Rossman Stephanie Scott Debra Schnabel Norman Smith Herb VanCleve Others who assisted in the development of this plan by providing information or by following its development include local groups such as the Takshanuk Watershed Council and Chilkat Indian Association. State and Federal staff were helpful in their review and comments on resource inventory and analysis and policy development. Gina Shirey-Potts, OPMP was especially attentive and helpful as were Patty Craw, DGGS-ADNR; Joan Dale, SHPO-ADNR; Mike Turek, ADFG; Roy Josephson, Forestry and Roselynn Smith, ADNR. My apologies to anyone inadvertently left off the acknowledgements. Frankie Pillifant, Sheinberg Associates. Haines Coastal Management Plan - 2007 iv Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A, Index Map of the St. Elias Mountains of Alaska and Canada Showing the Glacierized Areas (Index Map Modi- Fied from Field, 1975A)
    Figure 100.—A, Index map of the St. Elias Mountains of Alaska and Canada showing the glacierized areas (index map modi- fied from Field, 1975a). B, Enlargement of NOAA Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) image mosaic of the St. Elias Mountains in summer 1995. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration image from Mike Fleming, USGS, EROS Data Center, Alaska Science Center, Anchorage, Alaska. K122 SATELLITE IMAGE ATLAS OF GLACIERS OF THE WORLD St. Elias Mountains Introduction Much of the St. Elias Mountains, a 750×180-km mountain system, strad- dles the Alaskan-Canadian border, paralleling the coastline of the northern Gulf of Alaska; about two-thirds of the mountain system is located within Alaska (figs. 1, 100). In both Alaska and Canada, this complex system of mountain ranges along their common border is sometimes referred to as the Icefield Ranges. In Canada, the Icefield Ranges extend from the Province of British Columbia into the Yukon Territory. The Alaskan St. Elias Mountains extend northwest from Lynn Canal, Chilkat Inlet, and Chilkat River on the east; to Cross Sound and Icy Strait on the southeast; to the divide between Waxell Ridge and Barkley Ridge and the western end of the Robinson Moun- tains on the southwest; to Juniper Island, the central Bagley Icefield, the eastern wall of the valley of Tana Glacier, and Tana River on the west; and to Chitistone River and White River on the north and northwest. The boundar- ies presented here are different from Orth’s (1967) description. Several of Orth’s descriptions of the limits of adjacent features and the descriptions of the St.
    [Show full text]
  • HAINES HIGHWAY CORRIDOR Partnership PLAN
    HAINES HIGHWAY CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP PLAN 1 Prepared For: The Haines Borough, as well as the village of Klukwan, and the many agencies, organizations, businesses, and citizens served by the Haines Highway. This document was prepared for local byway planning purposes and as part of the submission materials required for the National Scenic Byway designation under the National Scenic Byway Program of the Federal Highway Administration. Prepared By: Jensen Yorba Lott, Inc. Juneau, Alaska August 2007 With: Whiteman Consulting, Ltd Boulder, Colorado Cover: Haines, Alaska and the snow peaked Takhinska Mountains that rise over 6,000’ above the community 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION..............................................................5-9 2. BACKGROUND ON Byways....................................11-14 3. INSTRINSIC QUALITY REVIEW..............................15-27 4. ROAD & TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM...................29-45 5. ToURISM & Byway VISITATION...........................47-57 6. INTERPRETATION......................................................59-67 7. PURPOSE, VISION, GOALS & OBJECTIVES.......69-101 8. APPENDIX..................................................................103-105 3 4 INTRODUCTION 1 Chilkat River Valley “Valley of the Eagles” 5 The Haines Highway runs from the community byway. Obtaining national designation for the of Haines, Alaska to the Canadian-U.S. border American portion of the Haines highway should station at Dalton Cache, Alaska. At the half way be seen as the first step in the development of an point the highway passes the Indian Village of international byway. Despite the lack of a byway Klukwan. The total highway distance within Alaska program in Canada this should not prevent the is approximately 44 miles, however the Haines celebration and marketing of the entire Haines Highway continues another 106 miles through Highway as an international byway.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT—Report to the Alaska Board of Fisheries
    DRAFT—Report to the Alaska Board of Fisheries Chilkat River and King Salmon River King Salmon Stock Status and Action Plan, 2018. By Divisions of Sport Fish and Commercial Fisheries Staff, Southeast Alaska Region January 2018 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Divisions of Sport Fish and Commercial Fisheries Symbols and Abbreviations The following symbols and abbreviations, and others approved for the Système International d'Unités (SI), are used without definition in the following reports by the Divisions of Sport Fish and of Commercial Fisheries: Fishery Manuscripts, Fishery Data Series Reports, Fishery Management Reports, Special Publications and the Division of Commercial Fisheries Regional Reports. All others, including deviations from definitions listed below, are noted in the text at first mention, as well as in the titles or footnotes of tables, and in figure or figure captions. Weights and measures (metric) General Measures (fisheries) centimeter cm Alaska Administrative fork length FL deciliter dL Code AAC mideye-to-fork MEF gram g all commonly accepted mideye-to-tail-fork METF hectare ha abbreviations e.g., Mr., Mrs., standard length SL kilogram kg AM, PM, etc. total length TL kilometer km all commonly accepted liter L professional titles e.g., Dr., Ph.D., Mathematics, statistics meter m R.N., etc. all standard mathematical milliliter mL at @ signs, symbols and millimeter mm compass directions: abbreviations east E alternate hypothesis HA Weights and measures (English) north N base of natural logarithm e cubic feet per second ft3/s south S catch per unit effort CPUE foot ft west W coefficient of variation CV gallon gal copyright common test statistics (F, t, χ2, etc.) inch in corporate suffixes: confidence interval CI mile mi Company Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Chart 5-25 Haines Event Visitors, 2008-2011
    Despite receiving few cruise ships in port, Haines benefits from the Skagway cruise ship port of call because Haines businesses and the HCVB worked to develop opportunities for cruise passengers to visit Haines during their stay in Skagway. In 2011, approximately 28,500 cruise ship passengers visited Haines via fast day ferry between Skagway and Haines to do day excursions in Haines. These visitors spent an average of $135 per person in Haines during their stay in 2011, or $3.8 million (2011 Haines Cruise and Fast Ferry Passenger Survey, McDowell Group). Dependable fast day boat runs between these communities is essential to capture this business. The Haines Borough’s Convention and Visitor Bureau has partnered with community organizations and businesses to actively create destination events and market them. The Haines Chamber of Commerce’s annual events calendar lists a number of activities that attract nearly 15,000 independent visitors annually (Chart 5-25). The largest of these is the multi-day Southeast Alaska State Fair that features live music, food, arts and crafts, farm animals, and amusement rides. In 2011, this event attracted 11,500 people. The next largest event is the 148 mile Kluane Chilkat International Bike Race in June, popular with local, Juneau and Whitehorse residents. Chart 5-25 Haines Event Visitors, 2008-2011 15,000 12,500 10,000 7,500 5,000 2,500 - 2008 2009 2010 2011 SE Fair Spring Fling 187 187 187 187 Eagle Festival 271 266 Alaska Brew Fest 665 683 953 1,009 Kluane Bike Race 1,200 1,041 1,282 1,223 SE State Fair 10,000 10,000 11,000 11,500 HAINES BOROUGH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN / September 2012 page 92 The opportunities for recreation related tourism are deep in the community with access to so many varied outdoor settings.
    [Show full text]
  • ALASKA FISH FACTOR Event in the World
    Serving Haines and Klukwan, Alaska since 1966 Chilkat Valley News Volume XLIV Number 9 Thursday, March 6, 2014 $1 Borough Heli-ski firms: pursues Open more bonds for area for ‘event’ By Karen Garcia school Two local heli-ski companies are asking the Haines Borough to temporarily open nearly 10,000 acres of Up to $7 million terrain closed to the sport for a month-long special event. in repair identified The “Make it Live!” photography competition proposed by Southeast Alaska Backcountry Adventures By Tom Morphet and Alaska Heliskiing would be open to all heli-ski Acting as a combined body, clients in Haines between March 21 and April 21. the Haines Borough Assembly and school board voted Tuesday to begin a process that could Heliport appeal hearing Tuesday put $6.94 million in school improvements before voters in - page 8 October in the form of school bonds. MAKE BELIEVE -- Austin Jackson plays with handmade puppets during a The group voted to spend recent puppet-making workshop at Haines School last week. Upcoming puppet SEABA co-owner Scott Sundberg said temporarily up to $6,000 to apply through a events include Tlingit-language ventriloquist Carlton Smith, who performs 2:30 opening new areas for skiing would draw more clients state program that reimburses the p.m. Friday at the school library. Tom Morphet photo. to Haines and “save the season” after a “dramatic loss borough up to 70 percent for the of snowpack in January” and “horrible exposure” in cost of the projects. The projects the press about poor snow conditions in Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining Barriers to Harvest Assessment a Southeast Alaska Subsistence Salmon Fishery
    Managing by the Numbers? Examining Barriers to Harvest Assessment a Southeast Alaska Subsistence Salmon Fishery by Morgen Elizabeth Smith B.A., Macalester College, 1999 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTERS OF ARTS IN ANTHROPOLOGY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of Anthropology and Sociology) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA July 2003 © Morgen Elizabeth Smith, 2003 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of Anthropology and Sociology The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada Date IS Ay,^ ^Cl3 Abstract Title: Managing by the Numbers? Examining Barriers to Harvest Assessment in a Southeast Alaska Subsistence Salmon Fishery This thesis identifies and discusses a variety of historical, economic, and regulatory barriers to the collection of harvest data for a subsistence salmon fishery on Southeast Alaska's Chilkat River. The research on which this paper is based also elicited suggestions for improving participation in and accuracy of future harvest assessment efforts. Research was conducted using standard social science interview methodology, participant observation, and reviews of historical and regulatory documents.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Eagles Gather
    WHERE EAGLES GATHER WHERE EAGLES GATHER THE STORY OF THE ALASKA CHILKAT BALD EAGLE PRESERVE Haines, Alaska JOE ORDÓÑEZ This book is dedicated to the memory of my friend Norm Blank, whose positive presence promoted a pure and healthy Chilkat Valley. FRONT COVER Two eagles lock talons in a battle over a fish. The eagle on the bottom was eating the fish. When the other eagle approached, the eagle on the fish flipped over and reached out to fend off the attack. PREVIOUS PAGE Fog and clouds lift off the Chilkat Summit, exposing the peaks and valleys of the Klehini and Kelsall Rivers’ headwaters. OPPOSITE Fall colors enliven views from Mosquito Lake State Park and Campground, located in the preserve. Large numbers of black cottonwood, birch, and other hardwood trees give Haines and the preserve some of the best fall foliage in the State of Alaska. INSIDE BACK COVER Northern lights brighten up the sky above Swan View Cabin in the preserve. BACK COVER With wings flared and talons forward, an eagle prepares for a landing. The Takhinsha Mountains provide a stunning backdrop to a bald eagle in flight in the Bald Eagle Preserve Council Grounds. Foreword THE FUTURE of the EAGLES Senator Gary Hart A phrase usually used to describe rare political leaders—“charismatic”—is sometimes applied to extraordinary animals. Lions are often described as charismatic. And in the world of birds, few would dispute the use of the word to describe the American bald eagle. The largest congregation of bald eagles in the world occurs outside Haines, Alaska, where every November upwards of 3,600 of the magnificent creatures feed Lupines, members of on salmon run from the Chilkat and Chilkoot Rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Squaw Creek- Rainy Hollow Area
    BRITISH COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF MINES HON. R. C. MACDONALD,Minister JOHN F. WALKER,Deputy Minister BULLETIN No. 25 THE SQUAW CREEK- RAINY HOLLOW AREA Northern.British Columbia By K. DeP. Watson 1948 4 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS . Geological Map of Squaw Creek-Rainy Hollow area ............................................... an pocket Fig. 1. Key-map of north-western British Columbia, showing 1oc:ation of Squaw Creek-Rainy Hollow area................................................................................................. 9 Fig. 2. Map of part of Squaw Creek........................................................................... In pocket Fig. 3. Geological map of part of Maid of Erin' claim facing 42 Fig . 4 . Cross-sections of part of Maid of Erin claim ......................................................... 45 Fig . 5 . Geological map of part of State of Montana claim ............................................. 49 Fig . 6. Geological map of part of Adamsclaim 51 Fig . 7. Geological map of part of Victoria claim .............................................................. 54 Fig. 8. Geological map of part of Lawrence claim ............................................................. 56 Plate I- A . Coast Mountains; view eastward across head of Clayton Clreek ...................... 63 B . View up valley of Inspector Creek toward Nadahini Mounta.in .......................... 63 Plate II- A . Looking south-westward from Lawrence claim, Rainy Hollow.......................... 64 B . Looking north-westward from Maid of Erin claim,
    [Show full text]