DOCSLIB.ORG

Circle Hooks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Circle Hooks North Carolina BlueprintsUNC-SG-BP-2004-02 North Carolina Sea Grant NC State University Box 8605 Raleigh, NC 27695-8605 Circle Hooks: A Way to Reduce Injury and Mortality in Grouper? Could hook type, hook size and water depth Commercial and recreational fishers often catch decrease the injury and post-release mortality of undersized groupers. There are at least two poten- undersized grouper and bycatch in commercial tial sources of mortality for undersized grouper: fishing? • If the grouper is hooked in the gut, the probabil- A North Carolina Fishery Resource Grant (FRG) ity that the fish will die increases. study (03-FEG-10) compared • If the grouper is caught — circle hook and J-hook perfor- and quickly pulled to the surface mance in a commercial hook- Photo by Alex Ng — from relatively deep water, it and-line grouper fishery. may die as a result of injuries The project demonstrated from decompression associated that circle hooks significantly with an enlarged gas bladder. decrease gut hooking of grou- Hook size and type have been per. Reduced injury likely de- shown to influence the size of fish creases post-release mortality of captured and how fish are undersized fish. The use of hooked. Moreover, the use of an circle hooks also lowers bycatch improper hook size may result in of nontargeted species. catches of undesirable bycatch The results concur with species that are released in an studies elsewhere on a variety of injured state. species that have shown that the The goal of the FRG study location of the hook wound is a was to collect data that managers critical factor influencing the could use to reduce mortality of survival of the released fish. undersized gag and red grouper Additionally, the FRG study and to reduce the bycatch of shows that fishing for grouper in undesirable reef fish. more shallow, near-shore waters The project team set out to: reduces incidents of distended, Nate Bacheler displays a gag grouper. • Examine numbers and sizes or blown, stomachs. of grouper caught in relation to All these benefits come at no additional cost, hook type and size; because circle hooks caught similar numbers and • Collect data on five anatomical hook placements sizes of grouper as J-hooks did. in relation to hook type and size; Background • Determine injury to the fish as a function of hook Many grouper species are overfished — espe- type and water depth. cially species such as red, gag and scamp grouper Methods — because of long life span and late reproduction. Twenty research trips were conducted between Efforts to manage these species in North Carolina May 14, 2003 and Aug. 20, 2003 over Continental include size limits, daily bag limits and closures Shelf waters of North Carolina, between 20 and 60 during periods of spawning aggregation. miles offshore. Under 2004 N.C. Division of Marine Fisheries A normal day of fishing consisted of eight to 10 (DMF) regulations, the legal size of a gag grouper is hours of bottom fishing, plus traveling three to four 24 inches and the legal size of a red and scamp hours to and from fishing grounds. grouper is 20 inches. Fishing time occurred from about 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. during each trip. Typical conditions consisted of species were grouped together in a bycatch cat- winds of 5 to 15 knots and seas of five feet or less. egory because no one species was caught fre- The terminal tackle consisted of the standard 2- quently enough to allow robust statistical analyses. hook, low-high bottom rig using 150-pound test monofilament leader, 2 three-way swivels, and a 16 Results to 20 ounce sinker. A total of 1,249 fish were landed during 20 The four hook treatments were 5/0, 7/0 and 9/0 research trips. The number of fish caught per trip offset J-hooks and a 12/0 circle hook. The research- ranged from 17 to 113 (mean=62.5 fish), and the ers used a Precision auto electric motor attached to number of grouper caught per trip ranged from 3 to a 6/0 Penn reel on a stand-up fishing rod with 130- 60 (mean=28.2 fish). The catch was comprised of pound test braided fishing line. 33 species of fish, but the most numerous six The four hook treatments were fished simulta- species accounted for 85 per cent of the total neously. Hook treatments were assigned randomly catch. to four rods. All fish except sharks and moray eels The three most numerous species caught were were brought on board. As fish were caught, data red grouper, red porgy and Atlantic sharpnose were recorded on species of fish; fork length (mm); sharks. hook type and size; the anatomical position of the hook (jaw, gut, body, eyes or gills); bleeding (yes or • The use of 12/0 circle hooks resulted in signifi- no); stomach distention (yes or no); and water depth. cantly fewer gut-hooked grouper than the use of Analyses 5/0, 7/0 and 9/0 J-hooks. (Fig. A) Certain fish species were combined in the analy- • Only 1 per cent of fish caught on 12/0 circle ses based upon their morphological, anatomical and hooks were gut hooked. ecological similarities in order to increase sample • For all J-hook sizes, 15 per cent were gut- sizes and allow a general understanding of the effect hooked. of hooking on similar groups of fish species. For • Larger hooks catch less bycatch. (Fig. B) example, all grouper species — gag, red, scamp, red • Grouper catch rates and sizes were the same hind, rock hind and Coney groupers — were in- for J-hooks and circle hooks. (Fig. B & C) cluded in a grouper category. • The incidents of “blown” stomachs directly Likewise, the three different shark species caught relates to water depth fished. More grouper had — Atlantic sharpnose, dusky and tiger sharks — blown stomachs when caught in deeper waters. were combined into a shark category. All other (Fig. D) Four hook treatments were fished simultaneously and were randomly assigned to four rods. Results 16 0.18 14 Large grouper 0.16 Bycatch Gut 0.14 12 Gills -1 0.12 10 Body 0.10 Eye 8 0.08 6 Proportion 0.06 Number caught d 0.04 4 0.02 2 0.00 0 5/0 J 7/0 J 9/0 J 12/0 C 5/0 J 7/0 J 9/0 J 12/0 C Hook treatment Hook treatment Fig. A Proportion of hooking locations in grouper for Fig. B Catch rates of large grouper and bycatch four hook treatments. Grouper wer gut-hooked more often across hook treatments. Catch rates of large grouper with J-hooks. The remaining proportion of fish for each (>20 inches) were not significantly influenced by hook hook treatment were jaw-hooked. treatment, while catch rates of bycatch were significantly reduced at larger hook sizes. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. 35 132 172 177 132 30 0.70 16 25 0.60 0.50 20 9 0.40 15 0.30 10 Proportion Fork length (inches) 0.20 15 5 0.10 510 0.00 0 40-59 60-79 80-99 100-119 120-139 5/0 J 7/0 J 9/0 J 12/0 C Depth (ft) Hook treatment Fig. C Hook treatments did not have a significant effect Fig. D Proportion of gag grouper with distended on grouper size. Numbers above bars indicate number of stomachs across five depth ranges. Note number of fish measured for each hook treatment. fish sampled for each depth range. About this report... This report is based on North Carolina Fishery For complete information about the FRG pro- Resource Grant 03-FEG-10 by: gram, visit North Carolina Sea Grant online at • Jeffrey Buckel and Nathan Bacheler of North www.ncseagrant.org and click on "Research." Carolina State University; A copy of the full FRG report can be down- • Alex Ng and Anthony Ng of Atlantic Beach. loaded. Or, request a copy from North Carolina Sea The FRG program is funded by the N.C. General Grant, North Carolina State University, Box 8605, Assembly and administered by North Carolina Sea Raleigh, NC 27695-8605; Phone: 919/515-2454. Grant. — Jeffrey Buckel A publication of North Carolina Sea Grant pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. NA86RG0036, Support also provided by the North Carolina North Carolina Fishery Resource Grant Program..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Comparison of Circle Hook and “J” Hook Performance in Recreational Catch-And-Release Fisheries for Billfish
    *MS07 Prince 4/11/02 11:26 AM Page 1 American Fisheries Society Symposium XX: pp. xxx–xxx, 2002 © Copyright by the American Fisheries Society 2002 A Comparison of Circle Hook and “J” Hook Performance in Recreational Catch-and-Release Fisheries for Billfish Eric D. Prince, Mauricio Ortiz, and Arietta Venizelos National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Fisheries Science Center 75 Virginia Beach Drive Miami, Florida 33149, USA Abstract.—This study evaluates the performance of circle and comparable-size “J” hooks on Atlantic and Pacific sailfish Istiophorus platypterus and, to a lesser extent, on Pacific blue marlin Makaira nigricans. Terminal gear performances were assessed in terms of fishing success, hook location, and bleeding associated with physical hook damage and trauma. Evaluations of trolling with dead bait took place off Iztapa, Guatemala, during the spring and summer of 1999, and assessment of drifting/kite fishing with live bait took place off South Florida, during the summer of 1999. Three hundred and sixty Pacific sailfish were caught in Iztapa, Guatemala, to assess terminal gear perfor- mance; 235 sailfish were on circle hooks, and 125 were on “J” hooks. Circle hooks used on sailfish had hooking percentages (i.e., fish hooked/fish bite) that were 1.83 times higher compared with “J” hooks. Once the fish were hooked, no difference in catch percentage (i.e., fish caught/fish hooked) between hook types was detected. Sig- nificantly more sailfish were hooked in the corner of the mouth using circle hooks (85%), as compared with “J” hooks (27%). In contrast, significantly more sailfish were deep hooked in the throat and stomach with “J” hooks (46%), as compared with circle hooks (2%).
    [Show full text]
  • IFS Carp Management Program 2013
    IFS Carp Management Program 2013 Carp Captures at a Glance Lake Sorell October – December Total 2013 Adult/Juvenile 1995 to present (Total) 556 0-556 37,542 Lake Crescent October – December Total 2013 Adult/Juvenile 1995 to present (Total) 0 0 - 0 7797 Overview Lake Sorell Figure 1. Proportion of carp captures during the October to December 2013 period per method 1 2013 IFS Carp Management Program The beginning of the 2013-14 carp spawning season in October was much slower than previous years, which was attributed to cooler than average weather in spring and early summer. The large aggregations of carp (over 700 fish in a single targeting event) which were caught during this period last year were not observed this season. Changes in water temperature are particularly important triggers for seasonal aggregations of carp. The cool, unsettled weather over the last three months has therefore had an impact on the overall numbers of carp caught. However, carp management staff have adapted quickly to these conditions by using the tracking data from radio tagged carp in conjunction with an increased emphasis on overnight gill net sets to continue fishing down carp numbers. The data indicated that the carp were moving, and becoming more active during the night, and are thus more susceptible to being caught in gill nets. Fishing has been focused on shallow bays and natural bottlenecks in the lake where carp were observed to be moving through. This strategy has provided results at a time when other methods were not proving fruitful. Over the period between October and December, 80 gill net sets accounted for a large proportion of the carp captured (Figure 1), with an average of just over 4 carp per net shot.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Fishing Guide |
    Texas Commercial Fishing regulations summary 2021 2022 SEPTEMBER 1, 2021 – AUGUST 31, 2022 Subject to updates by Texas Legislature or Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission TEXAS COMMERCIAL FISHING REGULATIONS SUMMARY This publication is a summary of current regulations that govern commercial fishing, meaning any activity involving taking or handling fresh or saltwater aquatic products for pay or for barter, sale or exchange. Recreational fishing regulations can be found at OutdoorAnnual.com or on the mobile app (download available at OutdoorAnnual.com). LIMITED-ENTRY AND BUYBACK PROGRAMS .......................................................................... 3 COMMERCIAL FISHERMAN LICENSE TYPES ........................................................................... 3 COMMERCIAL FISHING BOAT LICENSE TYPES ........................................................................ 6 BAIT DEALER LICENSE TYPES LICENCIAS PARA VENDER CARNADA .................................................................................... 7 WHOLESALE, RETAIL AND OTHER BUSINESS LICENSES AND PERMITS LICENCIAS Y PERMISOS COMERCIALES PARA NEGOCIOS MAYORISTAS Y MINORISTAS .......... 8 NONGAME FRESHWATER FISH (PERMIT) PERMISO PARA PESCADOS NO DEPORTIVOS EN AGUA DULCE ................................................ 12 BUYING AND SELLING AQUATIC PRODUCTS TAKEN FROM PUBLIC WATERS ............................. 13 FRESHWATER FISH ................................................................................................... 13 SALTWATER FISH .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Snapper Grouper Regulatory Amendment 29 (Best Fishing Practices and Powerheads)
    South Atlantic Snapper Grouper Regulatory Amendment 29 (Best Fishing Practices and Powerheads) Scoping Summary July 2018 Regulatory Amendment 29 to the Fishery Management Plan for the Snapper Grouper Fishery of the South Atlantic Region (Regulatory Amendment 29) addresses the use of best fishing practices and adjusts powerhead regulations. Written comments on Snapper Grouper Regulatory Amendment 29 will be accepted until 5:00 p.m. on August 17, 2018. Comments may be submitted in writing at the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) address at the end of this document. Comments may also be submitted via fax (843-769-4520) with the subject “SG Reg 29 Scoping” or online using the public comment form that can be found by clicking HERE. South Atlantic Snapper Grouper 1 Scoping Summary Regulatory Amendment 29 July 2018 What is scoping? Scoping is the first stage of the process to amend a fishery management plan after an issue has been identified (see steps in the process below). Scoping has two main purposes: (1) to inform you that the Council may propose new regulations or change existing ones and (2) to allow you the opportunity to comment on the issue or identify other issues that may need the attention of the Council. You will have more opportunity to provide comments as the amendment is developed; however, scoping is the first and best opportunity to make suggestions for the Council to consider before an amendment is developed. Note: Public comment prior to final approval of the amendment is the last opportunity for public input during the Council amendment development process.
    [Show full text]
  • Circle Hooks in the Pacific
    usually as hand-carved shell or CIRCLE HOOKS bone pendants on necklaces. A circle hook is defined as any IN THE PACIFIC round-shaped hook with a point that is perpendicular, or at a 90° angle, to the shank of the hook Circle hooks were probably first (Fig. 2). Figure 3 shows the parts used by Polynesian and Amer- Steve Beverly of a basic fish hook, including indian fishermen in the Pacific the point and the shank. It can SPC Fisheries hundreds or even thousands of be seen by comparison to a cir- Development Officer years ago.1 Now they are widely cle hook, that the hook in the used not only because they are (steveb@spc.int) diagram — which is actually a good at catching fish, but also J hook — has the point parallel because they are “friendlier” to to the shank. Circle hooks are bycatch species in commercial is showing that circle hooks are sometimes called C hooks or G fisheries and catch-and-release able to maintain the same catch hooks because of their rounded species in recreational fisher- rates of target species so fisher- shape resembling those letters ies. In ancient times circle hooks ies that use circle hooks can re- of the alphabet. They are also were very well adapted to catch- main viable. often referred to as rotating, or ing small bottomfish from shore self-setting hooks. Circle hooks and from canoes using simple No one knows who invented the rotate in the direction of the handlines. In more recent times, circle hook but it was probably point when a fish takes the bait circle hooks are used as the developed by fishermen from and pulls on the line (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Longline Catalog
    Bellingham:Seattle: 800-647-2135 800-426-8860 or 206-789-8110 • • Fax: Seattle: 206-789-7834 800-647-2135 • seattle@lfsinc.com LONGLINE SUPPLIES INDEX Anchors, kedge 8 Baskets, fish 10 Beckets 5 Bouy coatings 8 Bouys 8 Brushes, scrub 8 Cocoa mats 10 C-links 6 DFM swivel gear 2 Eagle Claw hooks 4 Files, mill bastard 11 Flags, halibut 7 Floats, longline 7 Floats, pole 7 Gaffs 9 Gangens & gangen twine 5 Groundline 3 Heaving hooks 8 Hog rings & hog ring pliers 6 Hooks 4 Hooks, boning 9 Ice breakers 11 Knife sharpeners 11 Knives 12 Lead weights 7 Marco System accessories & hooks 4 Mono fishing line 5 Mustad Autoline accessories & hooks 4 Pac lights 7 Paint brushes, disposable 8 Pliers, hog ring 6 Pole floats 7 Poles, longline 7 Radar reflectors 7 Rope burners 11 Rubbers, door 11 Scrapers, halibut & black cod 10 Sharpening steels 11 Shrink wrap 11 Skate tops & bottoms 10 Sleeves, aluminum 6 Snaps 5 Strobes 7 Swagers 6 Swivels 6 Tape, electrical, duct, & clear 11 Tape gun 11 Totes, halibut 10 Tubs, longline 10 Tubing, PVC, for gangens 5 Weights, clamp-on 7 Whetstones 11 Page 1 Bellingham: 800-426-8860 or 360-734-3336 • Fax: 360-734-4058 • Seattle: 800-647-2135 or 206-789-8110 • Fax: 206-789-7834 • seattle@lfsinc.com DFM longline Other features DFM will also build your gear specially Specially profiled sleeves that cannot be to suit your needs. bent or crushed in normal use; welded swivel eyes for extra strength; all components are Replacement swivels & accessories stainless steel for ling life; ropes are manu- Replacement swivels are available, with factured by DFM shareholders to guarantee open eye end for easy replacement.
    [Show full text]
  • International Symposium on Circle Hooks in Research, Management, and Conservation Abstracts*
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE. 88(3):791–815. 2012 http://dx.doi.org/10.5343/bms.2012.1031 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCLE HOOKS IN RESEARCH, MANAGEMENT, AND CONSERVATION ABSTRACTS* Challenges OF circle hook adoption in Indonesian live bait long- line Fisheries by Ahmad Hafizh Adyas and Imam Musthofa Zainudin.—Since 2005, WWF-Indonesia has facilitated efforts to reduce sea turtle bycatch on tuna longlines. The onboard observer data collected between 2006 and 2010 covering 49 vessels documented 359 sea turtles harvested. While fishermen did not think this bycatch was a major problem, con- sidering the large number of vessels in the fleet there is a large potential of cumulative im- pacts. Forty vessels from Benoa-Bali and Bitung North Sulawesi have been involved in circle hook trials and adoption between 2006 and 2010, covering 128 fishing trips, 3361 settings, and using >70,000 circle hooks. The results are promising—circle hooks reduced sea turtle bycatch by 78% while catching target fish as effectively as traditional J-hooks. However, the circle hooks (C16) could not be applied in live bait fisheries due to their large size; the 5 mm shank of the circle hook was inadequate to hold the bait (typically milkfish of 15–20 cm) and also the bait typically dies faster. Given that around 90% of Indonesia’s tuna longline fleet use live bait (with shallow sets), this is a considerable issue to resolve. Other obstacles for adop- tion stem from the use of monofilament line and the basket hauling technique, and the shape and weight of the circle hooks, all of which are perceived by fishermen as making their work more difficult (e.g., harder to haul and also causes a rumpling in the line).
    [Show full text]
  • Cheney District Fisheries Volume 8, Issue 1 Summer, 2017
    Cheney District Fisheries Volume 8, Issue 1 Summer, 2017 District News: Cheney, Hutchinson and Wichita Fishing After an unusually wet spring, the weather is beginning to dry out and area lakes have Inside This Issue returned to normal levels. Most species of fish (except catfish) are done spawning and have moved into their summer patterns. Although the potential for finding a red-hot bite is District News lower now than in the spring, summer fishing is more predictable. If you can determine a pattern, it will likely persist through the summer. Fishing Q&A Hook, Line & Sinker New Fisheries Biologist for Cheney District Hello everyone, my name is Andrew Schaefer and I’m the new District Fisheries Biologist for the Cheney District. I was born and raised in Waterloo, IA and attended Iowa State University, where I received a Bachelor’s Degree in Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences in 2009. Prior to moving to Kansas, I was a Freshwater Fisheries Biologist at the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission for several years. While in Florida, I completed a Master’s Degree in Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences at the University of Florida. In my free time, I enjoy waterfowl and upland bird hunting, as well as all manner of fishing, of course! I am excited to be back in the Midwest and I am looking forward to experiencing all the outdoor opportunities Kansas has to offer! Cheney Reservoir Spring Morones Run a Success Biologists often use the Latin designation Morones (MO-RO-NEEZ) when referring to all members of the temperate bass family, which includes White Bass, White Perch, and Wiper.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterizing a Hidden Fishery: Setline Fishing in the New River, Virginia
    CHARACTERIZING A HIDDEN FISHERY: SETLINE FISHING IN THE NEW RIVER, VIRGINIA Benjamin D. Dickinson Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science In Fisheries and Wildlife Science Donald J. Orth, Co-Chair Steve L. McMullin, Co-Chair Brian R. Murphy John R. Copeland December 9, 2013 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: catfish, setline, trotline, human dimensions, by-catch Copyright 2013, Benjamin D. Dickinson Characterizing a Hidden Fishery: Setline Fishing in the New River, Virginia Benjamin D. Dickinson ABSTRACT Catfishes Ictaluridae are important food fish that are harvested from the New River, Virginia by multiple methods, yet standard creel survey approaches do not accurately sample setline effort, a popular fishing gear for catfish. I characterized the New River setline fishery by estimating setline effort and catch rates of catfish and by-catch in 2011, and by investigating the attitudes and opinions of setline users during 2012. Setline effort was highest during June-August, and declined significantly by mid-September. Several dedicated setline users accounted for a significant portion of total setline effort. Experimental setlines baited with live minnows Cyprinidae proved to be an effective method for catching catfish but caught few walleye Sander vitreus, smallmouth bass Micropterus dolomieu, and muskellunge Esox masquinongy. Estimated by-catch of these species by setline fishers is small compared to catch by hook-and-line anglers, though walleye experienced high setline hooking mortality, and catch rates increased in autumn months. Setlines appear to be part of a larger “way of life” for some rural individuals, who may also hunt, trap, and garden as part of activities to supplement their diet or income.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide Program 2016
    GUIDE PROGRAM 2016 Dear Charter Captain, We would like to take this opportunity to introduce our exciting new captain’s program designed just for you! First, a little bit about us; Lee Fisher Interna- tional, Inc. has been the leading manufacturer of high-end cast nets for over 30 years. We pride ourselves in making the highest quality nets while offering them at the most reasonable prices in the market today. Moreover, cast nets are not our only offer anymore! We have introduced the Ohero brand to cover sports fishing products as well. Ohero offers new line of rods, reels, braided lines, leaders and hooks. They have been tested and re-tested to meet the highest quality standards for our customers. We are proud to introduce a new net to our lineup, The HUMPBACK Cast net. One of the highest quality and best built nets on the market. Check out www.justcastnets.com for more details. As a participant of this program, you are entitled to special discounts on our best offerings listed in the attached price sheet. They include our top-of-the- line Bait Buster hand-made cast nets, all Ohero rods, reels, braided lines, lead- ers, and our new Trident Hook. ***New members to the program will receive free shipping on their first order and 50% off the Guide price on their first cast net!*** All we ask is that you promote Lee Fisher Nets and Ohero products as often as possible. You can do this by simply placing the provided decals on your boat, trailer, vehicle, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Circle Hook Use and Management Measures in UNITED STATES Marine Fisheries
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE. 88(3):771–788. 2012 http://dx.doi.org/10.5343/bms.2011.1061 AN OVERVIEW OF CIRCLE HooK USE AND MANAGEMENT MEASURES IN UNITED STATES MARINE FISHERIES Jacqueline A Wilson and Guillermo A Diaz ABSTRacT We provide an overview of the use of, and management measures for, circle hooks in various marine fisheries of the United States. Circle hooks have long been known for their conservation benefits, such as reducing deep hooking, and therefore, reducing post-release mortality associated with this event. Some US commercial pelagic longline vessels voluntarily started using circle hooks due to increased catch rates for some target species and increased post-release survival of non-target species, whereas recreational anglers began using circle hooks to reduce post-release mortality in catch-and-release fisheries. Despite previous voluntary circle hook use, circle hooks have been a relatively new fishery management tool in SU state and federal fisheries. However, the difference in jurisdiction between state and federal waters has resulted in some disparity in state and federal circle hook regulations. In general, consistent management regulations between state and federal waters should be more beneficial for fish stocks that have both state and federal fisheries. Finally, while state and federal circle hook regulations are documented, voluntary circle hook use by commercial and recreational fishers participating in different state and federal fisheries is more difficult to characterize. Thus, overall circle hook use is difficult to quantify. The use of circle hooks in different fisheries is not a recent phenomenon. The original development of circle hooks occurred centuries ago in the Pacific (Hurum 1977, Johannes 1981).
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the U.S. Longline Bycatch Reduction Assessment and Planning Workshop
    Report of the U.S. Longline Bycatch Reduction Assessment and Planning Workshop Seattle, Washington, USA 18-20 September 2007 Conveners: Office of Protected Resources National Marine Fisheries Service Silver Spring, MD 20910 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-OPR-41 September 2008 Report of the U.S. Longline Bycatch Reduction Assessment and Planning Workshop Office of Protected Resources National Marine Fisheries Service Silver Spring, MD 20910 NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-OPR-41 September 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce Carlos M. Gutiérrez, Secretary National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Vice Admiral Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr., USN (Ret.) Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere National Marine Fisheries Service James W. Balsiger, Acting Assistant Administrator for Fisheries Suggested citation: National Marine Fisheries Service. 2008. Report of the U.S. Longline Bycatch Reduction Assessment and Planning Workshop. U.S. Dep. Commerce, NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-OPR- 41, 42 p. A copy of this report may be obtained from: Office of Protected Resources NMFS, NOAA 1315 East-West Highway, F/PR2 Silver Spring, MD 20910 Or online at: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/publications/techmemos.htm Technical Memoranda are used for documentation and timely communication of preliminary results, interim reports, or special-purpose information and have not received complete review, editorial control, or detailed editing, however they are expected to reflect sound professional work. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... iv PART I. WORKSHOP BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION ........................................ 1 PART II. SUMMARY OF WORKSHOP DELIBERATIONS AND OUTCOMES .............. 4 SECTION 1: OVERVIEW OF BYCATCH REDUCTION BY SPECIES GROUPS................................
    [Show full text]