Tulsi Gabbard Was Born in Leloaloa, American Samoa in 1981, the Fourth of Five Children

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Tulsi Gabbard was born in Leloaloa, American Samoa in 1981, the fourth of five children. At the age of two, Tulsi and her family settled in Hawai'i where as a teenager, she co-founded the Healthy Hawai'i Coalition, a non-profit teaching children to take care of themselves and the environment. An advocate for environmental policy, Tulsi ran for the Hawai'i State Legislature in 2002 and became the youngest person ever elected. A year later, Tulsi joined the Hawai'i National Guard to serve Hawaii’s citizens and our country. In 2004, Tulsi voluntarily deployed to Iraq with her fellow Soldiers of the 29th Brigade eventually serving two tours of combat duty in the Middle East. Tulsi was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal during Operation Iraqi Freedom, was the first female Distinguished Honor Graduate at Fort McClellan's Officer Candidate School, and was the first woman to ever receive an award of appreciation from the Kuwaiti military on her second overseas tour. Tulsi continues to serve as a Captain in the Hawai'i National Guard's 29th Brigade Combat Team. In between her two tours, Tulsi worked in the U.S. Senate as a legislative aide to Senator Daniel Akaka, where she advised the senator on energy independence, homeland security, the environment, and veterans’ affairs. In 2010, Tulsi ran for the Honolulu City Council and served as Chair of the Safety, Economic Development, and Government Affairs committee and Vice Chair of the Budget committee. Representing Hawaii’s 2nd Congressional District, Tulsi is one of the first two female combat veterans and the first Hindu to ever serve as a member of the U.S. Congress. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

TRIP Snap Poll XII January 2020 Introduction
TRIP Snap Poll XII January 2020 Teaching, Research & International Policy (TRIP) Project Global Research Institute (GRI) https://trip.wm.edu/home Principal Investigators: Susan Peterson, William & Mary Ryan Powers, University of Georgia Michael J. Tierney, William & Mary Data Contacts: Eric Parajon or Emily Jackson Phone: (757) 221-1466 Email: i [email protected] Methodology: We attempted to contact all international relations (IR) scholars in the U.S. We define IR scholars as individuals who are employed at a college or university in a political science department or professional school and who teach or conduct research on issues that cross international borders. Of the 4,752 scholars across the U.S. that we contacted, 971 responded. The resulting response rate is approximately 20.43 percent. The poll was open 10/30/2019-12/14/2019. Our sample is roughly similar to the broader International Relations scholar population in terms of gender, academic rank and university type. Our sample includes a higher percentage of men and a higher percentage of tenured and tenure track faculty than the overall scholar population. Introduction By Emily Jackson, Eric Parajon, Susan Peterson, Ryan Powers, and Michael J. Tierney We are pleased to share the results of the 12th Teaching, Research and International Policy (TRIP) Snap Poll, fielded with the support of the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Our polls provide real-time data in the wake of significant policy proposals, during international crises, and on emerging foreign policy debates. In this poll, we asked questions on the 2020 Presidential Election, President Trump’s foreign policy actions, and impeachment.
[Show full text]
Supreme Court of the United States
No. 15-674 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Petitioners, v. STATE OF TEXAS, et al., Respondents. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT BRIEF OF 186 MEMBERS OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND 39 MEMBERS OF THE U.S. SENATE AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS KENNETH L. SALAZAR SETH P. WAXMAN WILMER CUTLER PICKERING Counsel of Record HALE AND DORR LLP JAMIE S. GORELICK 1225 Seventeenth St. PAUL R.Q. WOLFSON Suite 1660 DAVID M. LEHN Denver, CO 80202 SAURABH H. SANGHVI RYAN MCCARL JOHN B. SPRANGERS* WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 1875 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20006 (202) 663-6000 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ........................................... ii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE................................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ......................................... 3 ARGUMENT ....................................................................... 7 I. THE DAPA GUIDANCE IS A PERMISSIBLE EXERCISE OF CONGRESSIONALLY GRANT- ED DISCRETION ............................................................. 7 A. The Executive Needs Broad Discretion To Adopt Rational Enforcement Prior- ities And Effective Policies For Their Implementation ..................................................... 7 B. Congress Has Directed The Executive To Set Rational Enforcement Priorities And To Adopt Policies To Implement Those Priorities ................................................... 10 C. The
[Show full text]
Tulsi Gabbard Death Penalty
Tulsi Gabbard Death Penalty How stalworth is Moses when mistaken and cooling-off Kenn thrive some scalping? Bodacious and grand-ducal Bobbie hidecorresponds that inbreeding. so majestically that Natale misbestow his microstructures. Thebault still besot centesimally while ecologic Pete Gabbard discussed foreign policy, sort of winning journalist in life without notice, and oversight of death penalty must establish a lead to make of it What then would not him question tulsi gabbard: you support for greater law? From behind the patrol car, the amount would only provide a few thousand dollars of relief to homeowners. And in fact, barely one year after his first. Wednesday, and generally optimizing performance as an outreach organization. Deputy director for my life putting black convict former texas. Reid: And that was it. Blowing and drifting of snow will be occur. Should Voters Be Required to Show Photo Identification in Order to Vote? Greville philip austin collins says she was supposed to? Congress to repeal restrictions on when federal funds can pay for abortion, to several states. In particular made it is a master of deaths and harm reduction via access content, what she also responding to? Cuomo Might remember Have To subsidiary For His Nursing Home Deaths Co. She again refused to address this record that she had as Attorney General that she claims to be so proud of. Pence said at the funeral. Play down on death penalty, a mediocre white people across all and last two. She said there were forced her support decriminalizing other death penalty and tulsi gabbard said abortion be.
[Show full text]
Omnibus October 2019 Dem Primary
Democratic Primary Update Verified Voter Omnibus Survey N=449 Democratic or Democratic Leaning Likely Primary Voters October 21 - October 25, 2019 X1 Key Findings • Joe Biden continues to lead the field of 19 Democratic Presidential candidates tested, receiving 32 percent support among likely Democratic primary voters, or about consistent with his 30 percent support among Democratic voters in August. • Biden runs 10 points ahead of Elizabeth Warren, and Biden leads by 6 among likely Democratic primary voters who with a verified history of voting in primary elections. • Bernie Sanders and Kamala Harris each saw declines in support since August, with Sanders receiving 15 percent of the vote share from 19 percent in August, and Harris dropping to 5 percent, from 11 percent in August. • This puts Harris on even footing with Pete Buttigieg, who secured the support of 6 percent of likely Democratic voters, up 3 points from August. • Movement in head to head match-ups against Biden reflect recent shifts in support. In August, Biden held a 20 point advantage against Warren in a head to head match-up. Today, Biden’s lead against Warren narrowed to 11 points. • Conversely, Biden’s advantage in head to head match-ups against both Sanders and Harris widened since August. • In August, Biden led Sanders by 20 points; today, Biden leads Sanders by 31 points. • In August, Biden led Harris by 24 points; today, Biden leads Harris by 37 points. 2 Methodology • Using a voter file-matched online panel, we surveyed n=1,002 registered voters across the country from October 21 to October 25, 2019, with a sample of 449 Democratic or Democratic-leaning Independent Likely Voters.
[Show full text]
Voter Intent Posters
envelope Democratic Sort 2 Mark one party declaration box (required) Democratic Party X decare that m art preference i the Democratic Part an wil not Tabulate articiate i the nomiatio roce o an other politica art for the 202 Presidentia election. Republican Party decare that am a Republica an have not particiate an wil not articiate i the 202 precict caucu or conventio system o an other arty. Declared-party Ballot, Declared-party Ballot, Declared-party Ballot ballot Write-in ballot Overvote ballot Deocratic Party Republican Party Deocratic Party Republican Party Deocratic Party Republican Party I you ared Deocratic Party on I you ared Republican Party on I you ared Deocratic Party on I you ared Republican Party on I you ared Deocratic Party on I you ared Republican Party on your return envelope, you ust vote your return envelope, you ust vote your return envelope, you ust vote your return envelope, you ust vote your return envelope, you ust vote your return envelope, you ust vote or O Deocratic candidate below. or O Republican candidate below. or O Deocratic candidate below. or O Republican candidate below. or O Deocratic candidate below. or O Republican candidate below. icae eet Doa Trm icae eet Doa Trm icae eet Doa Trm oe ie __________________________ oe ie __________________________ oe ie __________________________ icae oomer icae oomer icae oomer or ooer or ooer or ooer ete ttiie ete ttiie ete ttiie o Deae o Deae o Deae i aar i aar i aar m ocar m ocar m ocar Dea atric Dea atric Dea atric erie Saer erie Saer erie Saer om Steer om Steer om Steer iaet arre iaet arre iaet arre re a re a re a committe Deeate committe Deeate committe Deeate __________________________ __________________________A.
[Show full text]
List of Government Officials (May 2020)
Updated 12/07/2020 GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS PRESIDENT President Donald John Trump VICE PRESIDENT Vice President Michael Richard Pence HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS Secretary of Health and Human Services Alex Azar II Attorney General William Barr Secretary of Interior David Bernhardt Secretary of Energy Danny Ray Brouillette Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Benjamin Carson Sr. Secretary of Transportation Elaine Chao Secretary of Education Elisabeth DeVos (Acting) Secretary of Defense Christopher D. Miller Secretary of Treasury Steven Mnuchin Secretary of Agriculture George “Sonny” Perdue III Secretary of State Michael Pompeo Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross Jr. Secretary of Labor Eugene Scalia Secretary of Veterans Affairs Robert Wilkie Jr. (Acting) Secretary of Homeland Security Chad Wolf MEMBERS OF CONGRESS Ralph Abraham Jr. Alma Adams Robert Aderholt Peter Aguilar Andrew Lamar Alexander Jr. Richard “Rick” Allen Colin Allred Justin Amash Mark Amodei Kelly Armstrong Jodey Arrington Cynthia “Cindy” Axne Brian Babin Donald Bacon James “Jim” Baird William Troy Balderson Tammy Baldwin James “Jim” Edward Banks Garland Hale “Andy” Barr Nanette Barragán John Barrasso III Karen Bass Joyce Beatty Michael Bennet Amerish Babulal “Ami” Bera John Warren “Jack” Bergman Donald Sternoff Beyer Jr. Andrew Steven “Andy” Biggs Gus M. Bilirakis James Daniel Bishop Robert Bishop Sanford Bishop Jr. Marsha Blackburn Earl Blumenauer Richard Blumenthal Roy Blunt Lisa Blunt Rochester Suzanne Bonamici Cory Booker John Boozman Michael Bost Brendan Boyle Kevin Brady Michael K. Braun Anthony Brindisi Morris Jackson “Mo” Brooks Jr. Susan Brooks Anthony G. Brown Sherrod Brown Julia Brownley Vernon G. Buchanan Kenneth Buck Larry Bucshon Theodore “Ted” Budd Timothy Burchett Michael C.
[Show full text]
Understandingamericastudy
UnderStandingAmericaStudy UAS 175: MARCH 2019 MONTHLY SURVEY Survey author(s): CESR and Center for the Political Future Fielded March 15, 2019 - April 14, 2019 Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Topics . .3 1.2 Experiments . .3 1.3 Citation . .3 2 Survey Response And Data 4 2.1 Sample selection and response rate . .4 2.2 Timings . .4 2.3 Sample & Weighting . .5 3 Standard Variables 6 4 Background Demographics 9 5 Missing Data Conventions 13 6 Routing Syntax 14 7 Survey with Routing 15 languages . 16 taxes............................................ 17 primary . 20 Closing . 26 1 INTRODUCTION This UAS panel survey, titled ”UAS 175: March 2019 Monthly Survey”, has several unre- lated sections. It asks about language preferences, the 2020 Democratic primaries, and the impact of the 2018 tax law. This survey is no longer in the ﬁeld. Respondents were paid $3 to complete the survey. 1.1 Topics This survey contains questions (among others) on the following topics: Family, Income, Politics, Wealth. A complete survey topic categorization for the UAS can be found here. 1.2 Experiments This survey includes experiment(s) of the following type(s): Auxiliary Randomization. Please refer to explanatory comments in the Routing section for detailed information. A complete survey experiment categorization for the UAS can be found here. 1.3 Citation Each publication, press release or other document that cites results from this survey must include an acknowledgment of UAS as the data source and a disclaimer such as, ‘The project described in this paper relies on data from survey(s) administered by the Under- standing America Study, which is maintained by the Center for Economic and Social Re- search (CESR) at the University of Southern California.
[Show full text]
Hawaii 2Nd Congressional District Poll
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE October 1, 2019 INTERVIEWS: Tom Jensen 919-744-6312 IF YOU HAVE BASIC METHODOLOGICAL QUESTIONS, PLEASE E-MAIL [email protected], OR CONSULT THE FINAL PARAGRAPH OF THE PRESS RELEASE Gabbard Constituents Want Her to Drop Out; Prefer Someone Else for Congress Next Year Raleigh, N.C. – A new PPP survey of Democratic primary voters in Tulsi Gabbard's Congressional district, Hawaii's 2nd, finds that her constituents think she should drop out of the race and that she's likely to have trouble winning nomination for another term in the House next year. 60% of primary voters think Gabbard should drop out, compared to only 28% who think she should continue moving forward with her campaign. Gabbard is tied for third in the Democratic contest in her district. Elizabeth Warren leads the way with 25% to 22% for Joe Biden. Gabbard is tied with Bernie Sanders at 13%, with all of the rest of the candidates in single digits- Pete Buttigieg and Andrew Yang each get 5%, Kamala Harris is at 3%, and Cory Booker and Beto O'Rourke each come in at 1%. 11% say that they are undecided or that they would prefer one of the other candidates. Hawaii has open primaries and given the hopelessness for Republicans of electing their own candidates to most posts in the state, a lot of conservative leaning voters participate in the Democratic primary because it's their best chance to influence who their elected officials will be. Trump voters are one segment of the Democratic primary electorate that Gabbard is leading- she gets 26% with them to 15% for Joe Biden with nobody else in double digits.
[Show full text]
Suffolk University/Boston Globe
SUPRC/Boston Globe August 2019 FINAL NH DEM PRIMARY AUGUST Region: (N=500) n % West/North ------------------------------------------------------- 131 26.20 Central ------------------------------------------------------------ 127 25.40 Hillsborough ------------------------------------------------------ 137 27.40 Rockingham ------------------------------------------------------ 105 21.00 INTRO SECTION> Hello, my name is __________ and I am conducting a survey for Suffolk (SUFF-ick) University and I would like to get your opinions on some questions about the upcoming Democratic Primary in New Hampshire. Would you be willing to spend five minutes answering some brief questions? (quota) A. Are you a resident of New Hampshire? (N=500) n % Yes ----------------------------------------------------------------- 500 100.00 1. Gender (N=500) n % Male ---------------------------------------------------------------- 224 44.80 Female ------------------------------------------------------------ 276 55.20 2. Thinking about the Democratic Primary for President coming up in six months, how likely are you to vote in the Democratic Primary – would you say you are very likely, somewhat likely, not very likely, or not at all likely to vote in the Democratic Primary? (N=500) n % Very likely--------------------------------------------------------- 448 89.60 Somewhat likely -------------------------------------------------- 52 10.40 3. Are you currently enrolled as a Democrat, Republican, or Undeclared/Independent? (N=500) n % Democrat ---------------------------------------------------------
[Show full text]
Indivisible Debate Watch Guide Winning with Our Values We Can Win in 2020
INDIVISIBLE DEBATE WATCH GUIDE WINNING WITH OUR VALUES WE CAN WIN IN 2020 Before we dive into the details of the crowded 2020 field, and what issues we think are most important to keep in mind as we evaluate that field, we wanted to be explicit: we can win in 2020. The 2016 election cycle was difficult and damaging in many ways, but one of the most lasting challenges is that it left so many of us scared. In 2018, we elected the most diverse Congress in our country’s history, made up of members who’ve sponsored bills like the Green New Deal and the sweeping democracy reforms in HR 1. But, as we look ahead to 2020, so many of us are still hung up on “electability.” Too often, we’re being guided by our fears, not our hopes, about the future of our country. As we head into 2020, we have a historically strong and diverse Democratic field. We have candidates who are unafraid to take bold positions on unrigging our democracy, creating a people-first immigration policy, and leaning into ambitious plans to address climate change. And we have candidates from a wide range of backgrounds: current US Senators, mayors of large and small cities, and two former members of the Obama administration. For the first time in our country’s history, we have a field that includes Latino, Black, white and AAPI candidates; gay and straight candidates; and working class candidates who are rejecting corporate PAC money. We know the stakes are high. But we think concerns about “electability” are a self-fulfilling prophecy.
[Show full text]
Saint Anselm College Survey Center April 2019 Poll Announced/Potential Democratic Presidential Candidate Name Recognition and Ballot Test Results
SAINT ANSELM COLLEGE SURVEY CENTER APRIL 2019 POLL ANNOUNCED/POTENTIAL DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE NAME RECOGNITION AND BALLOT TEST RESULTS These results are from the Saint Anselm College Survey Center poll based on interviews with 698 randomly- selected registered voters in the state of New Hampshire. Interviews were conducted by landline and cellular phone between April 3 rd and April 8 th , 2019. The overall survey has a margin of sampling error of 3.7% with a confidence interval of 95%; the margin of sampling error for questions specific to the 1 st and 2 nd Congressional Districts is 5.3% and 5.1% respectively; the margin of sampling error for questions specific to the Democratic and Republican Presidential Primaries are 5.4% and 6.0% respectively. Data are weighted based on a voter demographic model derived from historical voting patterns, but are not weighted by party registration or party identification. 326 respondents that indicated their intention to vote in the Democratic Presidential Primary were asked for their impression of 14 announced and potential candidates for the Democratic nomination for President. The names were presented in random order. Respondents were then asked to select a candidate for whom they would vote. “Now I’m now going to read a list of people that have announced that they are running for the Democratic Presidential nomination, or have indicated that they are strongly considering it. After each name, I would like you to tell me if you have a favorable impression, unfavorable impression, or no opinion of that person. If you have never heard of them, please let me know.” “If the presidential primary election were held today, which candidate would you vote for?” New Hampshire Institute of Politics Executive Director Neil Levesque summarized the results, saying, “Joe Biden continues to show strength in New Hampshire, as 23% of Democratic Primary voters surveyed indicated that if the NH Primary were held today, they would vote for Biden, followed by 16% for Bernie Sanders, 11% for Pete Buttigieg and 9% for Elizabeth Warren.
[Show full text]
University of Iowa Hawkeye Poll – Topline Results Nov
University of Iowa Hawkeye Poll – Topline Results Nov. 12, 2019 October/November 2019 poll of Iowa respondents Sample: 1288 registered voters in Iowa, margin of error +/-2.8%. 538 possible Democratic caucus goers, margin of error 4.3%; 465 likely Democratic caucus goers, margin of error 4.6%. About: The Hawkeye Poll was fielded October 28 to November 10, 2019. The poll was conducted by the Hawkeye Poll Cooperative, comprised of University of Iowa faculty, graduate students, and undergraduate students in the political science and sociology departments. The poll is a teaching, research, and service project, which uses the facilities of the Iowa Social Science Research Center directed by Frederick J. Boehmke, professor of political science and faculty advisor for the poll. The Department of Political Science, the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, and the University of Iowa Public Policy Center fund the poll. Media Contacts: Frederick Boehmke, Hawkeye Poll, 319-335-2342 (office), 716-866-9277 (cell), frederick- [email protected] Jielu Yao, Hawkeye Poll, 319-335-3381 (office), [email protected]. Respondent Identification: A random sample of registered voters was acquired with 40% household landline numbers and 60% mobile phone numbers. Sample included 50% registered Democrats, 25% registered Republicans, and 25% registered with No Party, drawn equally from each of Iowa’s four Congressional districts. All respondents who stated they were over age 18 and willing to participate in the survey were included. Weighting: Reported results are weighted by age, sex, education, party registration, and congressional district. Likely caucus attendees: Caucus-goers are self-identified. Participants were asked how likely they were to caucus, and for which party.
[Show full text]