DOCSLIB.ORG

Gene Regulation by Different Proteins of Tgfβ Superfamily

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gene Regulation by Different Proteins of Tgfβ Superfamily Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine 1404 Gene regulation by different proteins of TGFβ superfamily VARUN MATURI ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1651-6206 ISBN 978-91-513-0172-3 UPPSALA urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-334411 2018 Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Room B42, BMC, Husargatan 3, Uppsala, Monday, 29 January 2018 at 09:15 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Faculty of Medicine). The examination will be conducted in English. Faculty examiner: Senior Researcher Anita Göndör (Karolinska Institutet). Abstract Maturi, V. 2018. Gene regulation by different proteins of TGFβ superfamily. Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine 1404. 50 pp. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. ISBN 978-91-513-0172-3. The present thesis discusses how gene regulation by transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) family cytokines is affected by post-translational modifications of different transcription factors. The thesis also focuses on gene regulation by transcription factors involved in TGFβ signaling. The importance of the poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) family in controlling gene expression in response to TGFβ and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) is analyzed first. PARP2, along with PARP1, ADP-ribosylates Smad2 and Smad3, the signaling mediators of TGFβ. On the other hand, poly ADP-ribose glycohydrolase (PARG) removes the ADP-ribose from Smad2/3 and antagonizes PARP1 and PARP2. ADP-ribosylation of Smads in turn affects their DNA binding capacity. We then illustrate how PARP1 and PARG can regulate gene expression in response to BMP that signals via Smad1, 5. Over-expression of PARP1 suppressed the transcriptional activity of Smad1/5. Knockdown of PARP1 or over-expression of PARG enhanced the transcriptional activity of BMP-Smads on target genes. Hence our data suggest that ADP-ribosylation of Smad proteins controls both TGFβ and BMP signaling. I then focus on elucidating novel genes that are regulated by ZEB1 and Snail1, two key transcriptional factors in TGFβ signaling, known for their ability to induce EMT and cancer metastasis. Chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-seq) and targeted whole genome transcriptomics in triple negative breast cancer cells were used, to find binding regions and the functional impact of ZEB1 and Snail1 throughout the genome. ZEB1 binds to the regulatory sequences of a wide range of genes, not only related to cell invasion, pointing to new functions of ZEB1. On the other hand, Snail1 regulated only a few genes, especially related to signal transduction and cellular movement. Further functional analysis revealed that ZEB1 could regulate the anchorage-independent growth of the triple negative breast cancer cells, whereas Snail1 could regulate the expression of BMP6 in these cells. We have therefore elucidated novel functional roles of the two transcription factors, Snail1 and ZEB1 in triple negative breast cancer cells. Keywords: EMT, Snail1, ZEB1, TGFβ, BMP, Gene regulation Varun Maturi, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Box 595, Uppsala University, SE-75124 Uppsala, Sweden. © Varun Maturi 2018 ISSN 1651-6206 ISBN 978-91-513-0172-3 urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-334411 (http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-334411) To my family and my teachers తృ భవ తృ భవ ఆర భవ In a day when you don’t come across any problems, you can be sure that you are going in a wrong path. - Swamy Vivekananda Main Supervisor Aristidis Moustakas, Professor Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology Uppsala University, Sweden Associate supervisor Carl-Henrik Heldin, Professor Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala Univeristy, Sweden Stefan Enroth, Senior Researcher Department of Immunology Genetics and pathology Uppsala University Sweden Opponent Anita Göndör, Associate Professor Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology Karolinska Institute Sweden Committee Members Tanel Punga, Associate Professor Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology Uppsala University Sweden Lars Forsberg, Associate Professor Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology Uppsala University Sweden Lars-Gunnar Larsson, Professor Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology Karolinska Institute Sweden List of Papers This thesis is based on the following papers, which are referred to in the text by their Roman numerals. I Markus Dahl*, Maturi V*, Peter Lönn*, Panagiotis Papout- soglou*, Agata Zieba, Michael Vanlandewijck, Lars P. van der Heide, Yukihide Watanabe, Ola Söderberg, Michael O. Hottiger, Carl-Henrik Heldin and Aristidis Moustakas. (2014). Fine tuning of Smad protein function by poly (ADP-ribose) polymerases and poly (ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase during TGFβ signaling PLoS One. Aug 18; 9(8):e103651). II Watanabe, Y.*, Papoutsoglou, P.*, Maturi, V.*, Yutaro Tsu- bakihara, Hottiger, M.O., Heldin, C.-H. and Moustakas, A. (2016). ADP-ribosylating enzymes control bone morphogenetic protein signaling. Journal of Biological chemistry. Apr 21. III Maturi, V. Enroth, S. Heldin, C.-H. and Moustakas, A. (2017) Genome-wide binding of transcription factor ZEB1 in triple neg- ative breast cancer cells. Manuscript. IV Maturi, V. Enroth, S. Heldin, C.-H. and Moustakas, A. (2017) Genome-wide binding of transcription factor Snail1 in triple neg- ative breast cancer cells. Manuscript. *Indicates authors contributed equally to the work Reprints were made with permission from the respective publishers. Other Papers not included in the thesis I. Kahata K, Maturi V, Moustakas A, (2017). TGF-β Family Signaling in Ductal Differentiation and Branching Morphogenesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. Mar.13 pii: a031997. II. Lehmann L, Aibara S, Hewitt G, Leitner A, Marklund E, Maturi V, Van der spoel D, Moustakas A, Boulton SJ, and Deindl S. (2017) Mechanistic insights into the auto-inhibition of the oncogenic chromatin remodeler alc1. Molecular Cell. (In Press). Contents Introduction ................................................................................................... 13 Overview .................................................................................................. 13 Gene regulation ........................................................................................ 14 PARP Family............................................................................................ 16 Gene regulation by signaling pathways .................................................... 19 TGFβ family ............................................................................................. 19 TGFβ-dependent Smad signaling ........................................................ 20 Bone Morphogenetic Proteins ............................................................. 21 Negative regulation of TGFβ and BMP pathways ............................... 22 Non-Smad signaling ............................................................................ 23 TGFβ in cancer ......................................................................................... 23 Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) ......................................... 24 Zinc finger E-box binding homeobox1 (ZEB1) .................................. 25 Snail1 ................................................................................................... 26 Methods ........................................................................................................ 28 Proximity ligation assay ........................................................................... 28 Chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing ........................................... 29 Ampliseq transcriptomic array ................................................................. 30 CRISPR-Cas9 ........................................................................................... 30 Present Investigation ..................................................................................... 32 Paper I ...................................................................................................... 32 Aim ...................................................................................................... 32 Background .......................................................................................... 32 Methods ............................................................................................... 32 Results ................................................................................................. 32 Conclusions ......................................................................................... 33 Paper II ..................................................................................................... 33 Aim ...................................................................................................... 33 Background .......................................................................................... 33 Methods ............................................................................................... 33 Results ................................................................................................. 34 Conclusions ......................................................................................... 34 Paper III .................................................................................................... 34 Aim ...................................................................................................... 34 Background .........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Supplemental Figures
    A B Previously-induced Doxycycline-naïve survival (%) survival (%) Recurrence-free Recurrence-free Days following dox withdrawal Age C D Primary Recurrent ** Par-4 mRNA H2B-mCherry DAPI Primary Recurrent Supplemental Figure 1: Recurrent tumors are derived from primary tumors. A. Kaplan-Meier survival plot showing recurrent tumor-free survival in mice previously induced with doxycycline (n=30) or tumor-free survival in doxycycline-naïve mice (n=10). B. Kaplan-Meier survival plot showing recurrence-free survival following doxycycline withdrawal in a cohort of recipient mice with orthotopic tumors (n=5). C. Representative images (40x magnification) of primary and recurrent orthotopic tumors following injection of H2B-mCherry labeled primary tumor cell line #1 into recipient mice. D. qRT-PCR analysis of Par-4 transcripts from primary (n=5) and recurrent (n=5) orthotopic tumors. Significance determined by Student’s t-test. Error bars denote mean ± SEM. **p<0.01. A B 1 TWIST1 TWIST2 0.5 SNAI2 0 VIM -0.5 ZEB1 ZEB2 -1 SNAI1 PAWR Positively correlated Negatively correlated with Par-4 with Par-4 CDH1 CLDN7 CLDN4 CLDN3 KRT18 NES = -2.07335 q-value = 0.001129 KRT8 TWIST1 TWIST2 SNAI2 VIM ZEB1 ZEB2 SNAI1 PAWR CDH1 CLDN7 CLDN4 CLDN3 KRT18 KRT8 Marcotte, et al. C 1 SNAI1 0.5 TWIST1 TWIST2 0 VIM -0.5 SNAI2 -1 ZEB1 ZEB2 PAWR CDH1 KRT18 KRT8 CLDN7 CLDN3 CLDN4 SNAI1 TWIST1 TWIST2 VIM SNAI2 ZEB1 ZEB2 PAWR CDH1 KRT18 KRT8 CLDN7 CLDN3 CLDN4 TCGA, Cell 2015 Supplemental Figure 2: Par-4 expression is negatively correlated with EMT in human breast cancer. A.
    [Show full text]
  • PAX4 R192H and P321H Polymorphisms in Type 2 Diabetes and Their Functional Defects
    Journal of Human Genetics (2016) 61, 943–949 & 2016 The Japan Society of Human Genetics All rights reserved 1434-5161/16 www.nature.com/jhg ORIGINAL ARTICLE PAX4 R192H and P321H polymorphisms in type 2 diabetes and their functional defects Jatuporn Sujjitjoon1,6, Suwattanee Kooptiwut2,6, Nalinee Chongjaroen3, Namoiy Semprasert2, Wanthanee Hanchang2, Kanjana Chanprasert3,4, Watip Tangjittipokin3, Pa-thai Yenchitsomanus1 and Nattachet Plengvidhya5 We have previously identified PAX4 mutations causing MODY9 and a recent genome-wide association study reported a susceptibility locus of type 2 diabetes (T2D) near PAX4. In this study, we aim to investigate the association between PAX4 polymorphisms and T2D in Thai patients and examine functions of PAX4 variant proteins. PAX4 rs2233580 (R192H) and rs712701 (P321H) were genotyped in 746 patients with T2D and 562 healthy normal control subjects by PCR and restriction- fragment length polymorphism method. PAX4 variant proteins were investigated for repressor function on human insulin and glucagon promoters and for cell viability and apoptosis upon high glucose exposure. Genotype and allele frequencies of PAX4 rs2233580 were more frequent in patients with T2D than in control subjects (P = 0.001 and 0.0006, respectively) with odds ratio of 1.66 (P = 0.001; 95% confidence interval, 1.22–2.27). PAX4 rs712701 was not associated with T2D but it was in linkage disequilibrium with rs2233580. The 192H/321H (A/A) haplotype was more frequent in T2D patients than in controls (9.5% vs 6.6%; P = 0.009). PAX4 R192H, but not PAX4 P321H, impaired repression activities on insulin and glucagon promoters and decreased transcript levels of genes required to maintain β-cell function, proliferation and survival.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcriptional Regulation of RKIP in Prostate Cancer Progression
    Health Science Campus FINAL APPROVAL OF DISSERTATION Doctor of Philosophy in Biomedical Sciences Transcriptional Regulation of RKIP in Prostate Cancer Progression Submitted by: Sandra Marie Beach In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biomedical Sciences Examination Committee Major Advisor: Kam Yeung, Ph.D. Academic William Maltese, Ph.D. Advisory Committee: Sonia Najjar, Ph.D. Han-Fei Ding, M.D., Ph.D. Manohar Ratnam, Ph.D. Senior Associate Dean College of Graduate Studies Michael S. Bisesi, Ph.D. Date of Defense: May 16, 2007 Transcriptional Regulation of RKIP in Prostate Cancer Progression Sandra Beach University of Toledo ACKNOWLDEGMENTS I thank my major advisor, Dr. Kam Yeung, for the opportunity to pursue my degree in his laboratory. I am also indebted to my advisory committee members past and present, Drs. Sonia Najjar, Han-Fei Ding, Manohar Ratnam, James Trempe, and Douglas Pittman for generously and judiciously guiding my studies and sharing reagents and equipment. I owe extended thanks to Dr. William Maltese as a committee member and chairman of my department for supporting my degree progress. The entire Department of Biochemistry and Cancer Biology has been most kind and helpful to me. Drs. Roy Collaco and Hong-Juan Cui have shared their excellent technical and practical advice with me throughout my studies. I thank members of the Yeung laboratory, Dr. Sungdae Park, Hui Hui Tang, Miranda Yeung for their support and collegiality. The data mining studies herein would not have been possible without the helpful advice of Dr. Robert Trumbly. I am also grateful for the exceptional assistance and shared microarray data of Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Table S1 the Four Gene Sets Derived from Gene Expression Profiles of Escs and Differentiated Cells
    Table S1 The four gene sets derived from gene expression profiles of ESCs and differentiated cells Uniform High Uniform Low ES Up ES Down EntrezID GeneSymbol EntrezID GeneSymbol EntrezID GeneSymbol EntrezID GeneSymbol 269261 Rpl12 11354 Abpa 68239 Krt42 15132 Hbb-bh1 67891 Rpl4 11537 Cfd 26380 Esrrb 15126 Hba-x 55949 Eef1b2 11698 Ambn 73703 Dppa2 15111 Hand2 18148 Npm1 11730 Ang3 67374 Jam2 65255 Asb4 67427 Rps20 11731 Ang2 22702 Zfp42 17292 Mesp1 15481 Hspa8 11807 Apoa2 58865 Tdh 19737 Rgs5 100041686 LOC100041686 11814 Apoc3 26388 Ifi202b 225518 Prdm6 11983 Atpif1 11945 Atp4b 11614 Nr0b1 20378 Frzb 19241 Tmsb4x 12007 Azgp1 76815 Calcoco2 12767 Cxcr4 20116 Rps8 12044 Bcl2a1a 219132 D14Ertd668e 103889 Hoxb2 20103 Rps5 12047 Bcl2a1d 381411 Gm1967 17701 Msx1 14694 Gnb2l1 12049 Bcl2l10 20899 Stra8 23796 Aplnr 19941 Rpl26 12096 Bglap1 78625 1700061G19Rik 12627 Cfc1 12070 Ngfrap1 12097 Bglap2 21816 Tgm1 12622 Cer1 19989 Rpl7 12267 C3ar1 67405 Nts 21385 Tbx2 19896 Rpl10a 12279 C9 435337 EG435337 56720 Tdo2 20044 Rps14 12391 Cav3 545913 Zscan4d 16869 Lhx1 19175 Psmb6 12409 Cbr2 244448 Triml1 22253 Unc5c 22627 Ywhae 12477 Ctla4 69134 2200001I15Rik 14174 Fgf3 19951 Rpl32 12523 Cd84 66065 Hsd17b14 16542 Kdr 66152 1110020P15Rik 12524 Cd86 81879 Tcfcp2l1 15122 Hba-a1 66489 Rpl35 12640 Cga 17907 Mylpf 15414 Hoxb6 15519 Hsp90aa1 12642 Ch25h 26424 Nr5a2 210530 Leprel1 66483 Rpl36al 12655 Chi3l3 83560 Tex14 12338 Capn6 27370 Rps26 12796 Camp 17450 Morc1 20671 Sox17 66576 Uqcrh 12869 Cox8b 79455 Pdcl2 20613 Snai1 22154 Tubb5 12959 Cryba4 231821 Centa1 17897
    [Show full text]
  • Context-Specific A-To-B-Cell Reprogramming by Forced Pdx1
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 30, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press RESEARCH COMMUNICATION from a cells via a bihormonal glucagon+insulin+ (Gcg+Ins+) Context-specific a-to-b-cell transitional state (Thorel et al. 2010). The interconversion reprogramming by forced presumably occurs in response to a combination of the physiological need to replenish b cells and regeneration- Pdx1 expression induced stress, raising questions as to the local or systemic 1 2 1 signals triggered by such lesions. Direct superimposition of Yu-Ping Yang, Fabrizio Thorel, Daniel F. Boyer, apro-b-lineage condition was reported when Pax4 expres- Pedro L. Herrera,2 and Christopher V.E. Wright1,3 sion was forced in pancreatic or endocrine progenitors or in 1 embryonic a cells to redirect endocrine differentiation or Vanderbilt University Program in Developmental Biology, coax pre-existing a cells into b cells. The converted cells Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt seemed similar to normal b cells and temporarily im- University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, USA; 2 proved glycemia under induced diabetes, although the Department of Cell Physiology and Metabolism, University effect was superseded by uncontrolled a-cell neogenesis of Geneva Faculty of Medicine, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland and fatality caused by extreme hyperglycemia (Collombat et al. 2009). These studies on the ability of a single Using single transcription factors to reprogram cells could lineage-allocating transcription factor to sustain com- produce important insights into the epigenetic mechanisms plete cell fate conversion suggest that similar analyses that direct normal differentiation, or counter inappropriate for other transcription factors could be insightful.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • 4-6 Weeks Old Female C57BL/6 Mice Obtained from Jackson Labs Were Used for Cell Isolation
    Methods Mice: 4-6 weeks old female C57BL/6 mice obtained from Jackson labs were used for cell isolation. Female Foxp3-IRES-GFP reporter mice (1), backcrossed to B6/C57 background for 10 generations, were used for the isolation of naïve CD4 and naïve CD8 cells for the RNAseq experiments. The mice were housed in pathogen-free animal facility in the La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology and were used according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and use Committee. Preparation of cells: Subsets of thymocytes were isolated by cell sorting as previously described (2), after cell surface staining using CD4 (GK1.5), CD8 (53-6.7), CD3ε (145- 2C11), CD24 (M1/69) (all from Biolegend). DP cells: CD4+CD8 int/hi; CD4 SP cells: CD4CD3 hi, CD24 int/lo; CD8 SP cells: CD8 int/hi CD4 CD3 hi, CD24 int/lo (Fig S2). Peripheral subsets were isolated after pooling spleen and lymph nodes. T cells were enriched by negative isolation using Dynabeads (Dynabeads untouched mouse T cells, 11413D, Invitrogen). After surface staining for CD4 (GK1.5), CD8 (53-6.7), CD62L (MEL-14), CD25 (PC61) and CD44 (IM7), naïve CD4+CD62L hiCD25-CD44lo and naïve CD8+CD62L hiCD25-CD44lo were obtained by sorting (BD FACS Aria). Additionally, for the RNAseq experiments, CD4 and CD8 naïve cells were isolated by sorting T cells from the Foxp3- IRES-GFP mice: CD4+CD62LhiCD25–CD44lo GFP(FOXP3)– and CD8+CD62LhiCD25– CD44lo GFP(FOXP3)– (antibodies were from Biolegend). In some cases, naïve CD4 cells were cultured in vitro under Th1 or Th2 polarizing conditions (3, 4).
    [Show full text]
  • Insulin/Glucose-Responsive Cells Derived from Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells: Disease Modeling and Treatment of Diabetes
    Insulin/Glucose-Responsive Cells Derived from Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells: Disease Modeling and Treatment of Diabetes Sevda Gheibi *, Tania Singh, Joao Paulo M.C.M. da Cunha, Malin Fex and Hindrik Mulder * Unit of Molecular Metabolism, Lund University Diabetes Centre, Jan Waldenströms gata 35; Box 50332, SE-202 13 Malmö, Sweden; [email protected] (T.S.); [email protected] (J.P.M.C.M.d.C.); [email protected] (M.F.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (S.G.); [email protected] (H.M.) Supplementary Table 1. Transcription factors associated with development of the pancreas. Developmental Gene Aliases Function Ref. Stage SRY-Box Transcription Factor Directs the primitive endoderm SOX17 DE, PFE, PSE [1] 17 specification. Establishes lineage-specific transcriptional programs which leads DE, PFE, PSE, Forkhead Box A2; Hepatocyte to proper differentiation of stem cells FOXA2 PMPs, EPs, [2] Nuclear Factor 3-β into pancreatic progenitors. Regulates Mature β-cells expression of PDX1 gene and aids in maturation of β-cells A pleiotropic developmental gene which regulates growth, and Sonic Hedgehog Signaling differentiation of several organs. SHH DE [3] Molecule Repression of SHH expression is vital for pancreas differentiation and development Promotes cell differentiation, proliferation, and survival. Controls C-X-C Motif Chemokine the spatiotemporal migration of the Receptor 4; Stromal Cell- CXCR4 DE angioblasts towards pre-pancreatic [4] Derived Factor 1 Receptor; endodermal region which aids the Neuropeptide Y3 Receptor induction of PDX1 expression giving rise to common pancreatic progenitors Crucial for generation of pancreatic HNF1 Homeobox B HNF1B PFE, PSE, PMPs multipotent progenitor cells and [5] Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1-β NGN3+ endocrine progenitors Master regulator of pancreatic organogenesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Cancer Biomed Central
    Molecular Cancer BioMed Central Research Open Access Androgen-regulated genes differentially modulated by the androgen receptor coactivator L-dopa decarboxylase in human prostate cancer cells Katia Margiotti†2,3, Latif A Wafa†1,2, Helen Cheng2, Giuseppe Novelli3, Colleen C Nelson1,2 and Paul S Rennie*1,2 Address: 1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada, 2The Prostate Centre at Vancouver General Hospital, 2660 Oak Street, V6H 3Z6, Vancouver, BC, Canada and 3Department of Biopathology and Diagnostic Imaging, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Viale Oxford, 81-00133, Rome, Italy Email: Katia Margiotti - [email protected]; Latif A Wafa - [email protected]; Helen Cheng - [email protected]; Giuseppe Novelli - [email protected]; Colleen C Nelson - [email protected]; Paul S Rennie* - [email protected] * Corresponding author †Equal contributors Published: 6 June 2007 Received: 27 March 2007 Accepted: 6 June 2007 Molecular Cancer 2007, 6:38 doi:10.1186/1476-4598-6-38 This article is available from: http://www.molecular-cancer.com/content/6/1/38 © 2007 Margiotti et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: The androgen receptor is a ligand-induced transcriptional factor, which plays an important role in normal development of the prostate as well as in the progression of prostate cancer to a hormone refractory state.
    [Show full text]
  • Combined Ectopic Expression of Pdx1 and Ptf1a/P48 Results in the Stable Conversion of Posterior Endoderm Into Endocrine and Exocrine Pancreatic Tissue
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 2, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press RESEARCH COMMUNICATION results reported in this communication, ectopic expres- Combined ectopic expression sion of Pdx1 in nonpancreatic chicken endoderm re- of Pdx1 and Ptf1a/p48 results sulted in the initiation of pancreatic budding, but it was not sufficient to promote differentiation of either exo- in the stable conversion crine or endocrine cells (Grapin-Botton et al. 2001). of posterior endoderm into Ptf1a/p48 is a bHLH transcription factor, which was originally identified as a part of a heterotrimeric pan- endocrine and exocrine creas transcription factor complex, referred to as PTF1 that activates transcription of exocrine specific pancre- pancreatic tissue atic genes in the mature pancreas (Cockell et al. 1989; Beres et al. 2006). Mice bearing a null mutation of Ptf1a/ Solomon Afelik, Yonglong Chen, p48 are completely devoid of exocrine pancreas, while 1 and Tomas Pieler endocrine pancreatic cells still form, but are found to be translocated to the spleen (Krapp et al. 1998). More re- Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Zentrum Biochemie und cent studies have revealed that Ptf1a/p48 is already ex- Molekular Zellbiologie, Abteilung Entwicklungsbiochemie, pressed in pancreatic precursor cells which contribute to 37077 Göttingen, Germany all pancreatic cell types, and that, in the absence of Patterning of the embryonic endoderm into distinct sets Ptf1a/p48, pancreatic precursor cells adopt a duodenal fate (Kawaguchi et al. 2002). These findings suggest a of precursor cells involves the precisely regulated activi- role for Ptf1a/p48 that is not solely in exocrine differen- ties of key transcription regulators.
    [Show full text]
  • De Novo, Systemic, Deleterious Amino Acid Substitutions Are Common in Large Cytoskeleton‑Related Protein Coding Regions
    BIOMEDICAL REPORTS 6: 211-216, 2017 De novo, systemic, deleterious amino acid substitutions are common in large cytoskeleton‑related protein coding regions REBECCA J. STOLL1, GRACE R. THOMPSON1, MOHAMMAD D. SAMY1 and GEORGE BLANCK1,2 1Department of Molecular Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida; 2Immunology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA Received June 13, 2016; Accepted October 31, 2016 DOI: 10.3892/br.2016.826 Abstract. Human mutagenesis is largely random, thus large Introduction coding regions, simply on the basis of probability, represent relatively large mutagenesis targets. Thus, we considered Genetic damage is largely random and therefore tends to the possibility that large cytoskeletal-protein related coding affect the larger, functional regions of the human genome regions (CPCRs), including extra-cellular matrix (ECM) more frequently than the smaller regions (1). For example, coding regions, would have systemic nucleotide variants that a systematic study has revealed that cancer fusion genes, on are not present in common SNP databases. Presumably, such average, are statistically, significantly larger than other human variants arose recently in development or in recent, preceding genes (2,3). The large introns of potential cancer fusion genes generations. Using matched breast cancer and blood-derived presumably allow for many different productive recombina- normal datasets from the cancer genome atlas, CPCR single tion opportunities, i.e., many recombinations that would allow nucleotide variants (SNVs) not present in the All SNPs(142) for exon juxtaposition and the generation of hybrid proteins. or 1000 Genomes databases were identified. Using the Protein Smaller cancer fusion genes tend to be associated with the rare Variation Effect Analyzer internet-based tool, it was discov- types of cancer, for example EWS RNA binding protein 1 in ered that apparent, systemic mutations (not shared among Ewing's sarcoma.
    [Show full text]
  • Unique Variant Spectrum in a Jordanian Cohort with Inherited Retinal Dystrophies
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article Unique Variant Spectrum in a Jordanian Cohort with Inherited Retinal Dystrophies Bilal Azab 1,2,*,†, Zain Dardas 2,3,† , Dunia Aburizeg 2, Muawyah Al-Bdour 4 , Mohammed Abu-Ameerh 4, Tareq Saleh 5, Raghda Barham 6, Ranad Maswadi 7, Nidaa A Ababneh 6 , Mohammad Alsalem 8, Hana Zouk 9,10, Sami Amr 11 and Abdalla Awidi 6,* 1 Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298-0565, USA 2 Department of Pathology and Microbiology and Forensic Medicine, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan; [email protected] (Z.D.); [email protected] (D.A.) 3 Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA 4 Department of Ophthalmology, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan; [email protected] (M.A.-B.); [email protected] (M.A.-A.) 5 Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa 13115, Jordan; [email protected] 6 Cell Therapy Center, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan; [email protected] (R.B.); [email protected] (N.A.A.) 7 Department of Ophthalmology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, UK; [email protected] 8 Department of Anatomy and Histology, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan; [email protected] 9 Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners HealthCare Personalized Medicine, Citation: Azab, B.; Dardas, Z.; Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; [email protected] 10 Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA Aburizeg, D.; Al-Bdour, M.; 11 Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Abu-Ameerh, M.; Saleh, T.; Barham, [email protected] R.; Maswadi, R.; Ababneh, N.A; * Correspondence: [email protected] (B.A.); [email protected] (A.A.); Alsalem, M.; et al.
    [Show full text]