'lTtT XIII-lI
•
•
~. ~1. g;i, ~smmf.A;rn f~,~, 1m!' ~~~ 1981 CENSUS-PUBLICATION PLAN
(1981 Census Publications, Series 11 in All India Series will be published ill the!ol!owing parts)
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA PUBLICATIONS
Part l:o-A Administration Report-Enumeration
Part I-B Administration Report-Tabulation
Part II-A General Population Tables
Part H-B, Primary Census Abstract
Part III General Economic Tables
P:Ht IV Social and Cultural Tables
Part V Migration Tables
Part VI Fertility Tables
Part VII Tables on Houses and Disabled Population
Part VIII Household Tables
Part IX Special Tables on Scheduled Casles and Scheduled Tribe~
Part X-A TOWIl Directory
Part X-B Survey Reports on selected Towns
Part X-C Survey Reports Oil selec:ed Villages
Part XI Ethnographic Notes and special studies on Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
Part XlI Census Atlas
Paper I of 1982 Primary Census Abstract for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
Paper I of 1984 Household Population by Religion of Head of Household
STATE GOVERNMENl' PUBLICATIONS
Part XIlI-A&B District Census Handbook for each of the 45 districts in the State (Village and Town Directory mid PrimaCY Cens us A1:!stp.~t) CONTENTS
1 Sfflfii~ Foreword J-TV
2 Sf~rt;{;;T Pref,ace 3 f~(:r 'fiT ifcf~T District Map 4 1=!~fa:~oT a{t \if'llfUfi'fT ~fHFf;T 'fiT ~fl~m arh Scope of District Censl~ H~oribook, eli;!' I fCl;)"(;rQUff'l1i'i'i fi!tq urr I Analytical Note 6 ff~fft~l ~ "f'f~) Tahsil Maps 7 crui!fi~~~H~ '«T'll tfft ~'qT ALPHABErTCl.L L1~;, v1' V!L .... GES 1-29 1-5 (i) f'FT'-?T (i~Tfr<1 5-1 !i ( ii) ~HT (i) Niv.'Jfi Tahsil 16-::0 (ii) J'ltara iand 20-24 (iii) Tika- garh 1,1 ~.l 2429 8 iirilf£'1f"fr!fiT SfT~flf!fi ~:n-nllT PRi\!,~ R\ CENSUS ALSTKACT ~(' 97 if.fi~~ fiir~ !fiT ~rd~ TI1\A" ARB DISF'ICT ABSn .\ CT 30-33 (l,[flftur ) Niwari Tah~il (i~l! I) 34-49 ('1lf<:lll ) {.Drb nJ 50-53 (ii) :j("1TU (1JTlrlllT ) Jatara Tahsil (Rural) 54-71 ( '1lf"\T 9 qfm~~;:rm:'lf !{llTf~ Gf"~lijl"T ~lT'd~ APPENDIX-Urban Primary Census Abstract 98-107 10 ~f;:m ~Tftf 'fiT 'SIT~f~ ~qV(;;r mmt Primary Census Abstract of Scheduled Castes lO8-111 11 i311~m ~'f3tlfa' 'fiT 'Stlqf~ ~~ ~l'&.it Primary Census Abstract of Scheduled Tribes 112-115 12 qf~-~~ ~n: Gt"~tOI'lT iiT 'StNfq~ APPENDIX - Development Blockwise Primary ~rmr Census Abstract 116-119 sn~ Gfi{i(1ltr(l ~f[i5i1 [r~r ~T;;:1f ~1"~'li'~T 'liT arh ij' ~\l' miiffirii I m fil'~furtiT iii ~T il1T 2,if: [l:TT<: 'li~ a'lif~~ fi;r<;rr ;;F'IlfUTiH ~f~'fiT ~UTi{T;fiT I:l;'li ~{ilf tfIf!l ~HlfrUT &tl'f if ~ tl'11~a arrcrf\'!i ~Ttll, ~q(1f;a' ~ I fGf('fT i;fi'IlTur'lT $f~'liT ~T IfRiIT f ~Rfa' ;rftu "SrnTmil'fi mr~T I ;;ri'flTUfi1' l;1'r<:fUrrt ilT~<: fifi :o'lili IJi;r 'iiI' ~m ~.ft'l: qf'\ aIT<: ;;IT,( ~. rn'liT I I1f -11T1T Ii m aft\: i'flT\: '!iT STNflr'l> 8filW'Cfi:'l' GTTftr aft\: arm_fi ~ il;m- il; .,~,r1l' el\;if, it :a-q(:fotT artcrf~'li ~f arTP.{'r: ih :>T"1r ';i!';fT ~ ort 'iT qf;:<{a-;; fif.!!; ~IT l '3';:~T 1r~ !r"liT11T'1" ,rm:r Ifl.l'T ~ I f;;r~r ;;r 'If fw;rr (tft 0 'rilRT'll) 26 ar~~ 1982 '+TT'<:<'f it; 1{il:T\f;;r~<:: ill FOREWORD The di~trict cemil'> handbook (Dc.~H), compiled by lht: Cen~us Organisation on behalf of the State govern.ntnts, i~ one of the mO~1 valuable produc1s of the Cen~us. The DCH is constantly referred to by planner~. adminl~trator" academiclan~ and researcher,. It is inter·alia u,ed for delimitation of eonstituendes, fClrmulatioil Of locall~vel and re!:'::onal plans and as an aid to District administr:ltion. Tlle di~trtlt census han 'b'lok i" the only pubhcatlOn~wh\ch provlJes Primary Cen~u, Ab,tr:tct (PCA) da'a upto villa' e level for the rural areas and \\ad\\he for eJ.ch c Iy or town. It al,o provilks data on infrastrucLUre anJ amenities in village, ~nd tOWlF, etc. The district cen, Part-B to village and town PCA and part-C comprbed analytical relor., admin istrative stall'lics. di,t;'ict cemus tables and certain analytical tables base While deoigning the format of 1981 DCH series some nel, featurt;. along with tbe restructuring of the f(lrnLlts of, "Iage and tOWIl .Jircctory have b,cn attetnpkd. At the ~ame time,comparability with the 1971 data bas als) been kept in view. All the amenities except power supply in the village have been brought tog~tter in the village directorv with the lllstruction that in ca,e an amenity is not available in the referrent village the di~tan.ce in broad rallges from the ne<.tre,t place where the amenity is available may be given. The re\tructuring of the formdt of the viliage directory and incroporating more exhau,tiv~ data 011 infraslfucture aspect particul early in relation to amenities and land-use pattern is e(epcted to further meet the need of micro level planning for rural areas. It i~ expectea to help Lot only in local area planning but regulating the plo,ision of goods and services a, .... ell so as io minimi,e the regional imblbllcfS in the rroces, of development. A few new iterrs of information have also been ntor ld'JceJ to m~,·t some of the rt,quirements of the Revis~d Minimum. Need Programme. Such new itelTlS of information a~ adult literacy centl'es, primary bealth suh-cen~r~s, and commu nity hellth workrrs in the vilbge have heen introduced in the vi'lage directory with this obj,ctiH' \1l mind. Tbe new item on approach to the village is to have au· idea about tbe Villages in the dlstrict ""hieh are in]cccssible A new column. "total poplllation and number of hou,etlohb" has been il1tro~urtd to ex~mine the correlation of the amenities with tl1e population an I num~er of households tbey lerve. Addillon of two more appendices listing the village; wherc no amenities are available and according to tbe proportion of scheduled ca'its and scheduled tribes populr.tioD to the total ropulation has also been llwlc Villi\ t!>is . i~w in mind. The forma,s of the town directory have abo t-ee" modified to meet the requirements of the Minimum Needs, Programme by providing inforllla,ion on a few Jlew items. A new stateme,lt on civil' and otter ameLities in slums in class-I and Oa;,s-l1 towns (Statement IV·A) has been introduced witb this objective in mind. It j, expc:cted ,hat this will help the planners to chalk out programmes on provIsion of civic aIT enities for the impro\'emen~ C'f slums. TL~ cloumns on Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes population in statemeut lV relatll1g to civic and. otber .lmenities and adult literacy classes/centres under educational facilIties in statement V me also aJdcJ illter·"l'a with this view. Asignificant addition is elas;, of town in all the SCVCn ~:atelJ1ents of the town dIrcctory. The infrastructure of amcnities in urban areas of tbe country call be best analysed by takiflg the ciass of towns into cOll'iideration. The addition of the columns on civic admini,tration status and popUlation in :l fcw statemcnts aiso serves this purpose. 1he formet of the primary censll~ abstract for the villages and to"IlS h~, becn formulated in the light of changes in the economic and other ques tions canvassed throught the individual slip of 1981 census. iv In order to avoid delay in publication of 1981 DCH series it has been so designed that Part-A of the volume contains villag~ and town directory and Part-B, the PCA of villages and towns including the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes PCA up to Tahsil/Town levels. At the beginning of the DCH a detaIled analytical note supported by a number of inset tables based on PCA and non census data iu'relation to the infrastructure has beell introduced to enhance its value. The district and tahsil/Police Stalion/C D Block etc., level maps depicting the boundaries and other important features have been inserted at appropriate places, to further enhance the V3'ue of the publication. This· publication is a joint venture of the State Government and the Census Organisation. The data have been collected alld compiled in the State under the direction of Shri K. C. Dubey the Director of Census Operation" ~adhya Predesh on behalf of the State Government which has bome the cost of printing. The task of plannintr, designing and coordination of this publication was carried out by Shri N. O. Nag, Deputy Regisrrar General (Social Studies) of my office. Dr. B. K. Roy, Deputy Registrar General (Map) provided the technical guid;mc(' in the preparation of the maps. Data recci\'ed from Ccn,us DireC:l;, J.t.::, h", \" 0':':.1 .(,·u,, ni,ed in the Social Studies Division at the head-quarters under the guidance of ~hri M. M. Dua, Selli,'r Research Offi:er. I am thankful to all who have contributed in the project. P. PADMANABHA REGISTRAR GENERAL, I:'-iDfA 1\'ew Delhi the 26 [h April, 1982 v PREFACE One of the most impofwnt publications of the Censw, are UIC District Census Handbooks. This pub lic.ltlon \\ as begun in thiS caption since 1951 Census. But prior to lhl:', a similar pUblicatioil was released in tIle CClbU~ earlier than 1951. That publicatIOn wa~ on the (Hie of Village Statistics and it contains only village names and total p'Jpulacion :h~rcof. The 1951 Cen,us co,lld, therefJre. be ~ai·j to represel1l a ,ignificallt step in the process of making detailed Census stati~tics available down upto the village level. In fact the District Censll5 H:mJbook is the 1110st important pUIJJiC:ltip,] :Jt IJJe Cen~us and is ;)Iso perhaps the most widely used. Also perhaps tnis is the only publication u,ed.:. lol: micro-level down upto the tahsil and development block. The form of Ute DistrIct i=ensus Handbook has gone consderable chang~ since 1951. This is basically due to the growing demand for more information. For the purpose of convenience as well a~ with a view of 'mking the baSIC ~Llt"tic, available with the d'lta u~ers as early as possible the District Census Handbooks have been split into 2 p:ws Part-A C1ntains the In'roductory Note on the distrd and Town!Villag~ Directory. This volume will be found useful 10 get almost all the non-Census statistics available at one place. Part-B contains an introductory note and the Primary Census Abstract. One of the inn lv.tttOn of the present Censuj hlS been in term; of allot,nent of Location Code number to the villages. In the earli~r O~nsuses the location code system was such tlIat the villages of a Patwari Circle w~rc t'oll'1d .ll differ~nt serial numbers. Since the Patwari Circle still remains an important administrative unit {he Location code numbers have been Sl) given in the present Census that It may be possible to locate all the villagc~ of a particuler Patwari Circle at one place one lJelow the other. When the planning for the present Census was started in 1979 the tahsils were still revivable as an important unit of the administration the who,Ie planning was, therefore, done taking. tahsil as the unit. It was during the course ofth~ C!nsus that 5 ')me requests were informally received for making blockwise data available. ~ince these requ:sts were received very late and w:,r.: also received only in an informal manner, it has not been possible to dlsturb tl-!e original pl •.mning of villages arranged according to the locati')n code numbers taking tll15il a') one unit. However ad iicio:lal e'<:ercise has been done and in addition to the tahsil figures blockwise figures have also hWl i 1dicated. It is hoped that the availability of these block wise data will enhance the ntility of this publication. It is hoped that Ihi:, handbook will provide Ihe basic statistical support to executive and developmental administration. It is needless to ~tate that ,the proper implementation of policy depen'ds on the ability of the administration authorities concerned. It may be remembered that the villlagewise area figures given in the Primary Census Abstract and lhe Village Directory are those based on the village papers while the tahsil totals given in PCA are obtained from the Land Records department which in many cases exclude forest area. The statistics that are contained in the district census handbooks are the result of a massive an d marathon exercise in the compilation and tabulation of voluminous statistics. The compilation of the statistics contained in this volume was carried out by 9 Regional Tabulation Offices each under a Regional Deputy Director of Census Operations. These Regional Offices were run with the help of purely temporary staff-roughly atout 1,500 Tabulat0rs, atout 250 Checkers and about 80 Supervi~ors_ I am grateful to my colleagues, the Regional Deputy Directors and those temporary staff for the speed and accuracy in the ed iting vi" ] am thallkful to all who have contributed ·to bring this publicatian possible. The census organisation i~ abo grateful to the Government of Madhya Pradesh for having been so kind as to undertake the pUblication of thc:,e handboo"-, :cnd 10 the Controller, Printing and Stationery, Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal and his staff for the printing arral1"ements made. The inspiration behind this ambitious venture is that of our indefatigable Regi~trar General, Shn P. Paumanabha to whom we are all deeply grateful. Our thanks are also due to Shri N. G. Nag. Deputy IZegistrm General (Social Studies) for all the help that we received from him uaCl his section. K. r. DlJBr.y Director of Cefl';U~ Oper,ltiom" Bhopal Ma,lhya Pradesh. Janma~htarnl. 31 Aug. 1983 30' 45' 11' bo' dJO' s MADHYA PRADESH DISTRICT TIKAMGARH 2S' I 12"'11.f.1 10' 25' 10' .'12 ItKILCMUAl! a:: ::l a. 0: 25' 00' !!~J 00 I '( <{ REFERENCE 1: BOUNDARY lUTE. ., :r: DISTRU .• ,y TIHSIL ._._,- (J HEADiUARTERS· DISTR~, TAHSIL @@ NATIONAL HIGHWAY. . ... __'_'_li __ STATE HIGHWAY . ". --'-"'-'-- METALL[O ROAD " UNMETALLED ROAD .. ,,------RAILWAY LINE WITH STATIoN: IROAD GAUGE .. .~ RIVER AND STREAM ..:::=...L' \ FOREST AREA. ~ I VILLAGE HAVING 5000 AND ABOVE • KARl KHAS POPULATION WITH NAME , 2" URBAN AREA WITH POI'ULATION SIZE 10 CLASS III, IV, V ••• POST AND TElEGRAPH OFFICE. no DEGREE COLLEGE [iJ REST HOUSE ...... ,,"" AH \, k_------~~------~-----~----~s_------~~------~:,------j-J0 0 18 1,1 30' .. S 7' 00' IS' 19 oj ANALYTICAL NOTE Xl NOTES AND EXPLANATIONS This note gives the meanings and explanations could be ensured and which should provide basis for of terms and concepts lIsed in tbi~ Handbook. This analysing of figures and urbanisalion in (he country. necessary becaube, \\ithout a proper grasp of the But it has to be remembered that the urban criterion 1neanings of such simplc. concepts as building, of 1981 varies slightly from that of 1961 and 1971 house, household. workers etc., it is not possible to Censuses is that the males working in activities such appreciate the data presented in the handbook. Thus as fishing. Logging, etc'. 'vere treated as engaged in one who does not know that an unpretentious hut non-agricultural activity and therefore contributed to in the thick of Bastar forests with unplastercd bam the 75% criterion in 1961 and 1971 Censuses, whereas boo walls and a thatch roof and wittt space hardly in the 1981 Census these activities are treated as on enouga for two cots is not a bit less of a building par with cultivation and agricultural labour for the than Ihe Indian versions of [he sky scrapers in one purpose of this criterion. of the metropolitan cities, or that a central jail housing all manner of criminals and ~hady chara~ Applying the criteria described abme. a list of is as much household as the household of the most 327 towns was finali~ed and it is these 327 towns pious and god-fearing citizen i. the State, may not whieh are treated as urban areas for the purpose of be able to apprecia'e what exactly the fignres 1981 Census. The Additional Secretary to the Gove represent. rnment of India in the Ministry of Home Affairs sent a letter (0 the Chicf Secretaries of the State Concepts and Definitions Governments as back as 10 Ih may, 1979. requesting Rural/Urban them to ensure that no changes are made in the jurisdiction and boundaries of municipalities aDd It has been the tradition of the Indian Census revenue villages, tahsi!s, sub-divisions and districts to present the Census data for rural and urban during the period from 1-1-1980 to 30-6-1981. Howe areas separately. In fact, in all the Censuses throug wr, sub,equent to our finalisation of rural and urban hout the world this classificatioJl of census data into frame the State Government in the Local Government rural and urban units is generally recognised. However, Department notified many places as notified areas distinction between rural and urban is not yet amen and municipalties. Such places have not been tteated able to a single definition which would be applicable as towns for the purpose of Census and the secretary to all countries. to Government in the Local Governmeo.t Department The definition of an urban unit at the 1971 had agreed to thi~. arrangements· Similarly the State Census was as follows :- Government raised the status of 6 municipal commi ttees to that of municipal corporations. These new (a) All places with a municipality, corporation, municipal corporatiOns. are also treated as municipal cantonment board or notified town area; committees. (b) All other places which satisfied .he followiug criteria; While dealing with the subject of rural and ( i) A minimum p 'pulation of 5,000; urban break up mention may b~ made of the area under the Special Area Development IAuthorlty. The (ii) At leaht 75 per ceot of male workiog Special Area Development Authority have been population engaged in non-agricultural cf)nstltuted under tbe Madhya Prade~h Nagar Tatha pursuits; and Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973 and they enjoy the (iii) A density of population of at least 400 the power to function as a municipality so far as the per·sq. km. (1,000 per sq. mile). municipal management of that area is concerned.The- The same criteria is retained at the 1981 Census limits of these Special Areas include large portions also so that comparability with the previous Census of a rural areas comprising number of villages situated xii around thc core town or villagc of ~uch ,Special Area. area should get fully urbanised in a period of two or for example Orchha i~ a SADA area in Tikamgarh three decades. Certain Standard Urban Areas were district but there is no town in this area. Similarly, determined on this basis in 1971 and some basic data Ma\anjkbanrl in Balaghat district, Bheraghat in were presented for 1951,196l and 1971 for such Jabalpur district, Mandav in Dhar district and similar areas and their components. Similar data have been otbar cases are SADA areas but there is no urban presented for the Standard Urban Area~ in 1981 also. area witbin that. The objective of the SADA area The idea is to present basic data for those areas for perhaps is to control the future development of these four to five decades so that the urbanisation process areas in a planned manner and that is aiL It was, in these areas can be studied. However, there have therefore, not considered desirable to treat such been minimum' changes in the constituent units SADA areas ~u PJ.l' with other urban bodies like of the Standard erban Areas of 198t Cellsu~ as municipal corpo'a!ions, municipal committee etc. compared to thosc of 1971, but the list of SUA and only that par, of it is treated as urban which is remains unchanged, really so, As mch in the Korba SAD A area only Size Class of Towns : Korba town has been treated as urban .and rest of The urban areas are classified into 6 classes he area remains in the rural fraJ;l1e. referred to as twons of Class r to VI. The classifica tion IS shown beloW Urban Agglomeration: Class 1,0:1.(100 and abO\c Apart from town/city the 1971 concept 0 urban Clas, II 50,000 to 99,999 ,'gglomeration is also adopted for the 1981 Census. CIa,s III 20,000 to 49,999 Very of en large railway colonies,unil-ersity campuses, Class IV 10,000 to 19,99Q port area~, military camps, etc. come up olltside the Class V 5.000 to 9.999 statutory Lmits or the city or town but adjoining it. Class VI Le~~ than 5.000 slich arev~ may not by themselves qualify to be It is customary to treat a town h~\\ ing a !Wpu! trea 'cd [I, towm but if they fvflll a contiguous spread alion of I lac and above a; a cit\', with the (('Wl1, they are outgrowths of the town 'and desen e to } e treated as urban. Such town, together Census House ; ",ith their omgrnvths have reen treated as one urban A Census House is a builthng or part " f a build unit and called urban agglomeration, An urban aggl- ing baving a separate main entrance form the road or 0meraticn may constitute.: common courtyard or stnircase, etc" u'cli or recogn ised as a sepamte unit. It may be occup'ed nr vacant. (a) A city with continunus outgrowth, tthe part It may be used for a re,i,:!cntial "r !>c'n-fcsidenti:J.I oU'grClwth being outside the ~tatUlory limits but perpose 0 r both, failing within the boundaries of the adjOining village or villages): If a building had a nurrbcr of tlats or b'ocks which were inoependent uf or,e another having >ep~, (b) One lown with similar outgrowth or two or rate enrr::lllce~ of their own form the road or a more adjoining (owns with their outgrowths as ill common stairca,e or a cOllunon courtyard lcadin:,: 10 (a): or a main gate, they have been considered as' ~eparate (c) J\ city and one or more adjoining to\vns census ho lIses. ,.. ith their oUigrowths <:111 of which form a continuous . spread, In some ca~es, however. it was difficult to apply the definition ·strictly. Fur example, in an urban area, Standard Crt-an Area: a flat has live rooms, each having direct cntrance ,to A ncw con~ept of Standard Urban Area introd the cummon stairca~e or courtyard which by defini uced ill 1971 Cen,us will also be follmled for the tion, had 10 be treated as jive census house,. If all 1981 CeE>lIs. The e"ential requllements for the these five rooms were found occupied by single cRm,titution uf a ;)taudard Urban Area are- hubschold entire flat ",as treated <\5 I)ne cemms iI()use. In such cases singleness of use was taken i 1110 ,,; 1l1si (i) it sllOUld have a core town of a minlJ11Um d.eration to avoid undue proliferation L r the number , population of 50,000 (ii) the contiguom. areas made of ('emu, homes. up 'of other urban as well a~ rural administrative 'l:nils should have mutual wlio-economic links with An oe~upied residential census house meul's a tne-ctire town and (iii) in all probability lhi, entire a cen,u'i hOllse which i~ actually I,Ised for J'c>iJential xiii purposes, either wholly or partly by one or more Dhar, Dewas, Guna, Gwa!i"i', in'!l;rl? Jhabua, households. Khargone Mand'aur, More' a, Ratr.:-:l1 11, Ratlam. Shajapur, Shivpuri. Ujjain ana Vt,lj,ha D::,r:ct<) and Household: Kumhar (in Chhatarpur, Datia, :'311na, Rewa, Satna, ShadaL Sidhi and Tikamgarh dlb.lJC,o) Scheduled The term household in census is defined as a Ca~tes. Likewise Kecr and Pardhi Scheduled Tribes group cf person who commonly live together and are ,till re,tricted only in Bhopal, Raisen and Sehore would take their meals from a common kitchen di~tricts: Milia in SlrO:Jj suh-division of Vidisha unless the exigencie, of work prevented anyone of district: Panika in Chhatarpur. Datta, Panna, Rewa, them from doing so. Tilcre rna, be a household of Satna Shahdol, Sidhi and Tikamgarh district>, Pardhi persons related by blood or a hOllsehold of Babeliia, Chita Pardhi.Umgoli Pardhi,Phame Pardhi, unrelated person" or hwing a mix of both. Examples Shikari, Takankar, T?k.a in (I) Bastar, Chhindwara, of unrelated.households are boarding houses,messess, Mandla, Raigarh, SCUd. and Surguja di,tricts. (2) hostels, residential hotels, w,cue homes, jaIls, ~shrams Baihar tha,il of Balaghat distnct, (3) Betul and etc. These are called Tnstitutional households. There Bhainsdehi tahsilS of Bewl district, (4) Bilaspur and may he one member households two member hOllse Katghora tahsils of Bilaspur di5tnct, (5) Durg and holds or multi-member households. For census purp Balod tahsil~ of Durg distoct, (6) Ctlowki. Manpur oses. each one of these types IS regarded as a and Mohalla Revenue Inspectors' Circle~ of Rajnan household. dgaon distr:ct, (7) Murward, Patan and Sil10ra tahsils of Jaba'pur di~rict, (8) Hosilangabad and Sohagpu r There are three types of hou,eholds viz., norma!, tahsils of Hoshangabad district and Narsimhapur IIlstitutional and housele>s hou~eholds. A houseless district, (9) HaTsud tahsil of Khandwa district, oousehold is that which is normally found to be (10) Bmdra-Nawagarh, Dhamtari and Mahasamuud residing on the road side, pavements, in hume pipes. tahslls of Raipur district. Persons belonging to the under staircases, or in OPCIl, temple, mandaps, castes/tribes mentioned above found in the districts platforms and the like. Insltittuional households have mher than those where Scheduled have not been been explained above. Those households whieh do treated as 5cheduled castes or scbduled tribes as the not fall in the category of Institutional household and case may be. It may be mentioned here that sche housele~s household have been cltegorised as Normal dued lcastes can belomg to the Hindu or the Sikh households, Tbe enumerator was required to indic religion only. The list of Seheduled Castes and Sche ate in the Household Scheduled whether the hOllse duled Tribes relating to Madhya Pradesh relevent to hold belonged to 'Institutional household' or 'House 1981 Census has been given Immediately after this ress household'. For in;titutional 'I' was writ:en note as Annexure-I against the que tioo 'Type of household" and '0' was indicated in the case of homeless houeshold. For Literates and Educated Persons normal household, DO entry was required to be made. A person who can both read and write with The enumeration of institutional households un,1erstanding III anv language is treated as literate. ""as done in the manner the normal households were A person who can merely read but cannot write, is enumerated durirg the enumeration period from 9th not literate. It is not necessary that a person who is February to 28 th Februarv, 1981. The houseless literate should have received any formal education households were enumerated on the night of 28th February, 1981. or should have passed any minimum educational standard. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes: The test for literacy was necessary only when Scheduled Ca~te~ and Scheduled Tribes are the enumerator bad any doubt about any person those found in the Notification of Scheduled Castes! returning as 'literate'. The test for literacy was Scheduled Tribes Order (Amendment) Act, 1976 (108 ability to read any portion of the Enumerator's of 1976). By tbis amendment, area restrictions for Instruclion Booklet and to write a simple letter. most of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Ability merely to sign one's name was not considered have been removed. However,' the area restriction adequate to quali~y a person as being able to write still remains in respect of Dhobi (in Bhopal, Raisen with understanding. If a person claimed to be literate an dSehore districts) Kotwal and Pard hi (in Bhind in some other language with which the enumerator xiv was not famIliar, the respondent's word was taken as (I) those who have worked any time at all Correct. during the last year, (2) those who have not worked at all. The latter group consists of the non workers. All children of the age of 4 years or less were This information is obtained in Q. 14A. Having treated as illiterate even if they might be going to classified the population into two grups, the next school and had picked up reading and writing a few attempt has been to classify those who have worked words. any time into Main workers and Marginal workers on the basis of time spent on work a~ well as secon 3. Classification of workers by Industrial Category: dary work, if any, of the Main workers. If a person had worked for six months or more (183 days or At the 1981 Census, the questions which, were more) he was treated as Main worker and if the pe ca nva;.sed in the Individual slip to elicit information riod of work wa~ less than six months he was regarded on cconomic characteristics of the population were as a Marginal Worker. In Q. ISB details of secon as foll(l\\~ :- dary work or marginal' work are obtained. Fmally an attempt has been made to determine whether those (i) Q. l4A W()fked any time at, all last Year? who are non-workers or marginal workers are seeking . or are avrcihible for work. Yes No(H;STfb7RIB/lfO) It will thus be seen that' thcse questions Oll economic aspects havc becn so designed as to Q. 14B If yes in 14A, did you work for major identify all workers, full time workers or seasonal parl of last year? Yes (1) No (2) workers or marginal workers and non-workers with reference to the actjvitie~ during the la,t one year (Ji) Q. 15A Main activity)a,t year? period prior to the date of enumcratlon. Yes in 14B (C/AL(HHI(OW) The various terms allJ definitions used in colle No it1 14B(H/sfiDjRjBjiTO) cting the economic datu J1Uve b~el1 explaificd brieily in the fol!owmg paragr:lphs, Q.ISB Yes-Any other work any time Jast year '? Q ISB Yes (C/ALjHHljOW) No Definition of work: Q.14B No~:' Workdolie-any 'Hme iiST-year ? Work has been delmcd as p.,uticipatioll in any CjALjHHljOW economically productive activity. SUch participation may be physical or menIal i,l nature. Work involve~ not only actual work but :,]$0 ctf"c',:\'c sup<:rvision (iii) Q .16- If No in 14A or 14B. seeking/available fof and direction of work, work? Yes (1)fNo (2) For persons 011 regular employment or engaged The abov\: quest;,ons were formulated after in regular type of work, temj?orarv absence during detailed d'scw,slon at the Data User's Conference the reference period on account of illness, holidav, and technical groups. At the 1961 and 1971 Cen5Uses, temporary closure, strike etc .. was not a dis~qualifica the economic questions were based on different ti.on for treating them as workers. approaches, namely, usual status and current slatus, Persons under training, such as apprentIce>, were adopted with reference period of one year and with or without stipend~ or wages were also treated one \l 'The above questions are in three parts and have 1n all these questi(}n~, the referen.ce period is the been designed in such a \II ay ilia! first of all it attem , one year; preceding the date of emimeratton, Certain p~s to divide the population into two broad groups type~ of work such us agriculrure, household industry viI., like gur making etc. ~re carried on either throughout xv the year or only during certain seasons or part of the Fishing, Hunting & Plantation." Orchards &. allieJ year, depending on the local circumstance. In all activites; (IV) Mining, (V) Manufacturing. Proce,s such cases the reference p!riod has been the broad ing and servicing with sub-categories (a) At House time span of the agricultural seasons preceding the hold Industry and (b) other than Household Industrv enumeration. (VI) Construction, (VII) Trade and Commerce (VlIl) Transport, Storage and Communications; and (IX) Main Workers: Other workers. The correspondence between the categories of 1981 and 1971 arc as under :- The main workers 'are thos~ who have worked for a major part ofthe year preceding the enume 1981 Categories 1971 Cat~gories ration. Main actvity of a person who was engaged in more than one activity was reckoned in terms of time disposition. For example, if a person had worked as II 11 daily wage labourer for 4 months, as an agricultural III V (A) labourer for 1 month anl as cultiva~ar for 2 months, IV III IV, V (b), VI, he was treated as a Main worker orr tJ'.c b:lsis of total VII, VIH & IX time spent on work and his main activity have been reckoned as Daily Wage Labourer since he spent Cultivator: major part of his time on work in this activity than <1$ culrivator or agneulturallabourer. For purposes of Census a person i~ workinL~ as cultivator if he or she is engaged either as employer, .\larginal Workers: single worker or family worker in CUltivation of j,llld owned or held from Government or beld from private M ANNEXURE I MADHYA PRADESH [The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act., 1976. Dated the 18 th Septemer, 1976]. Scheduled Castes : 1 Audhelia. 37 Mang, Mang Garodi, Mang Garu '0 i, Dankhni 2 Bagri, Bagdi. Mang, Mang Mahasi, Madari, Garudi, Radhe Mang. 3 Bahnu, Bahana. 38 MeghwaJ. 4 Balahi, Balai. 39 Moghia. 5 Banchada. 40 Muskhan. 6 Hurahur, Basad. 41 Nat, Kalbelia, Sapera, Navdigar, Kubutar. 7 Bargunda 42 Pardhi, (in Bhind, Dbar, Dewas, Guna, Gwalior, 8 Basor, Burud, Bansor, Bansodi, Bansphor, Basar. Indore, Jhabua, Khargone, Mandsaur, Morena, 9 Bed a. Rajgarh, Ratlam, Sh8Japur, Shivpuri, Ujpin and 10 Beldar. Sunkar. Vidisba Districts). 11 Bhangi, Mehtar, Ba1mik, Lalbegi, Dharkar. -1J Pasi. 12 B:lanU!11ati. 44 Rujjhar. 13 Chadar. 45 Sansi , Sansia. 14 Channr. Chamari, Bairwa, Bhambi, Jatav, 46 Silawat. Mllchi. Regar, Nona, Rohidas, Ramnami, S"ilnam', Suryabanshi, Surjyaramnami, Ahirwar, 47 Zamral. Chamar Mangan, Raidas. Scheduled Tribes J 5 Chidar. 16 Clllkwa. Chikvi. Agariya 17 Chitar. 2 Andh. 18 Dahait. Dahayat. Dahat. 3 Baiga. 19 Dewar. 4 Bhaina. 20 D:13nuk. 5 BJnria Bhumia. Bhiuuhar Bhumia, Bhumiy:l, 21 Dhed, Dher. Bhana, Paliha, Pando. 'l~ D hobi (in Bhopal, Raisen and Sehore Districts)' n Bhattra. 23 Oohor. 7 Bhil, Bhibb, Berela, P:\telia. 24 DJm. DLlmar, Dome, Domar, Doris. S Uhil, Mina. 25 Ganda, Gandi. 9 Bhunjw. 26 Gha~i, Ghasia. 10 Biar, Riyar. 27 Holiya. 11 Binjhwar. 2K Ka ~jar. 12 Birhul, Birhor. 29 Kail3, Pltharia. 13 Damar, Damaria. 30 Khatik. 14 Dhanwar. 31 Koll, Kori. 15 Gadaba, Gadba. 32. KOlwal (in Bhind, Dhar, Dewas, Guna, Gwalior, 16 Gond: Arakh, Arrakh, Agaria, Asur, Badi Ma~'ia lndcrc, Jhabua, Khargone, Mandsaur, Morena, Bada Maria. Bhotola, Bhimma, Bhuta Koilabhu Rajgharh, Ratlam, Shajapu T, Shivpuri, Ujjain, ta, Koliabhuti, Bhar, Bisonhorn Maria, Chota and Vidisha districts). Mria. Dandami Maria, Dhuru, Dhurwa, hDoba, 33 Khaog:n, Kanera, Mirdha. Dbulia, DorIa, Gaiki, Gatta GaHi, Gaita, Gend 34 Kuch banJhla. Gowari, Hill Maria, Kandra, Kalanga, Khatula 35 KumhaL (in Chhatarpur, Datia, Panna, Rewa, Koitar, Koya, Khirwar-Khirwara, Kucba Mari:" Satna, ShahdoJ, Sidhi & Tikamgarh Districts. Kuchaki Maria, Madia M'lria, Ma:la, M anne 36 MaharMehra; Mehar., war, Milghyu, Mog;a, Mooghya, Mudia, Muria, xviii Nagarchi, Nagwanshi, Ojha, Raj, Sopjhari Jhar 37 PaD. c'ka, Thatia, Thotya, Wade Maria, Vade Maria. 38 Pardban, Pathari, Saroti. Daroi. 39 Pardhi (in Bhopal, Raisen, and Schore districts). 17 Halba, Halbi. 40 Pardhj, Bahelia; Bahellia, Chita Pardhi, Langoli, 18 Kmar. Pardhi, Phanse Pardhi, Shikari. TakamkarTakia 19 Karku. (in (1) Bastar, Cbhindwara. Mandla, Raigarh,· 20 Kawar, Kanwar, Kaur, Cherwa, Rathia, Tanwar, Seoni and Surguja districts, (2) Baihar tahsil of Chattri. Balaghat district, (3) Bdul and Bhainsdehi tahsils 21 Keer (in Bhopal, Raisen and Sehore districts;. of Betul district. (4; Bilaspur and Katghora tahsil$ 22. Khirwar, Kondar. .of Bilaspur district, (5) Durg and Balod tahsils of Durg district, (6) ChowkL Manpur and 23 Kharia. Mahla Revenue lmpector's Circles Rajnan 24 Kondh, Khond, Kandh. of dgao district, (7) Murwara, Patan and Sihora 25 Ko!. n tahsih of Jabalpur di,trict (8) . 26 Kolam. Ho~hangabad 27 Korku, Bopchi, Mouasi, Nih aI, Nahul, Bondhi and Sohagpur tahsils of Hoshangabad districtf Bondeya. and NarsinhapuT district. (9) Harsud tahsil or 28 Korwa, Kodaku. Khandwa district, (10) Bindra-Nawagarb, Dha 29 Msjhi. mtari and Mahasamund tah>il~ of Raipuc 30 Majbwar. district) 31 Mawasi. 41 Parja. 32 Mina (in Sironj sub-division of Vidisha district). 42 Sahariya, Saharia, Scharia, Sosia, Sor. 33 Munda. 43 Saonta, Saunta. 34 Nagesia, Nagasia. 44 Sauro 35 Oraon, Dhanka Dhangad. 45 Sawar, Sawara. 36 Panika (in Chhatarpur, Datia, Panna, Rewa. 64 Som. Satna,hahd Siuhi and Tibmgarh districts. xix HISTORY AND SCOPE OF DISTRICT CENC\JS HANDBOOK The History of the District Census Handbooki sists of two volumes Vi7. DCHB Part A and DCHB Could be traced from the 'Village lists' brought out Part B. Part A contains the village/Town Directory for every district in 1901 and 'Village Statistics' for and Part B contains the Town/Vilhigewise Primary every district in 1911. But this was discontinued Census Abstract of the concerned district. 1921 and 1931. In 1941, however 'Village Statistics' were brought out by the then Central Provinces and Part A : Village Directory contains information Bentr Government. It wa~ for the :first time in 1951 about the name of village, total area of village, total the practice of bringing out a single volume known population and number of households in the ~illage, as the District Census Handbook, giving villagewise amenities like education, medical. drinking water, statistics and other Census tables for the district at post and telegraphs, market day, communications, the cost of the State Government was initiated and approach to village, distance from the nearest town, is continuing since then. power supply, staple food, land use, places of relig! ous, historical and arci:Jaeological interest etc. The District Census Handbook, compiled by the Census Organisation on behalf of the State Govenment In addition there are four appendices to the is one of the mmt important publication of the village Directory as under :- Census and is widely used by planners administrators (1) Tahsilwise abstract of educajonal, medical academicians and researchers. and other amenities. The scope of the District Census Handbook has (2) Land utilizatIOn data in respect of Censu~ gore considerable change since 1951. In 1951. the towns District Census Handbook contained only the Pri mary Census Abstract and the Census tables In view (3) Tahsilwise list of villa ges where no ameni of the usefulness of this publication, improvements ties are available. and were made in 1961 by including non-census data like climate, agriculture. cooperation industry, education, (4) Tahsilwise list of villages according to the Healtn etc., as also an 'Introductory' Note for each proportion of Scheduled Castes/Scheduled district. Unfortunately, the desire to make the District Tribes population by ranges. Cen~us Han,1book more comprehensive delayed its publication. Therefore, in 1971, it was decided to The last two appendices have been included for publish the District Census Hano book in three parts the first time in 1981 Census. Appendix-III WllJ be in order to release the maximum data as and when helpful for planning input in areas/villages where finalised. Part A contained the Village Directory which basic infrastructure is lacking and appendix-IV will be helpful for planning welfare programmes for gives villagewise non-census ~tatistics of land use, area and amenities available within the village, Part scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes at micro level, B contained the Villagewise Primary Census Abstract partic'Jlarly in relation to area development orienta. and Part C contained various adm.lnistratille statistics. tion programmes. Parts A and B were however, published in one vo Similarly the 'Town Directory contains seven lume since it was economical to do so as data for both statements as below ;- the parts become available early. Parts A and B were published separately in Hindi and English versions. Statement I-Status and growth history Coliection of data for Part C was cumbursome and it took unduly long time in its finalisation, and ultima Statement II-Phy!ical aspe·:ts and location fi)f tely this publication had to be abondoned in view of towns. the enormous delay in its printing. Statement III-Municipal Finance In 1981 Census, with a view to avoid delay in Statement IV-Civic and other amenities bringing out the nCH series, the part containing the administrative stati~tics has been dropped. Thus Statement IV A-Civic and oth.r Amlnitie5 in espreht ont series of District Census Handbook con Notified Slums. Statement V-Medical, educationl, recreational holds, population by sex, as also the sexwise population arid cultural facilities. of Scheduled Castts and Scheduled Tribes,lit(rac), and popUlation by sec into four broad industrial categories Statement VI-Trade, Commerce & Industry and viz., cultivators, agricultural lab-urers, hou~ehold Bankmg. industry and other workers, marginal workes and non-workers. An additional statement IV -A is meant only for 1 he inclusion of Primary Census Abstractr rela Class-I and Clas.-1I towns giving the civi~ and other ting to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tnbes at amenities III notified slums. This statement has been the tahsil/town level ill another important feature of introduced for the first time in 1981 census. the DCHB series of 1981 Census. Part B- rhe townfvillagewise Primary Cemus }\n appendix containing Development Block Abstract gjve~ the basic data like area of the village, wise-'Vlkas Kbandwar'totals of PCA figures has occupied re'tdentlal houses. total number ,)f house- a.so been included. XXI ANALYTICAL NOTE Tikamgarh district, in Sagar Revenue Division, confusion with the tehri ! During the period when it was a princely State, Ac;ording to the 1981 Census, the population original capital of this territory was at Orchha. In of the district is 736,981 persons (with 391,471 male! 1783 it was tran.ferred to Tehri (Tikamgarh was and 345,510 females). 647,5'71 persons are found to then known by this name). Subsequently in 1887 it be living in 869 inhabited villages and another 89,410 was officially reconllnised as Tikamgarh to avoid persons in 6 townll of the distrU:t. XXII The (ollowlng table gives the population, number of villages and towns, 1981. TABLE 1 Population Number of Villaaes and To'OS, 1981 POPULATION .------...... ------, No. of Villages No. Name Total Rural Urban .--...... ---. of Sl. of ,------"------. ,-----...... ----....., .----...... ----....., Total inha- Town, No. Tahsil P M F P M F P M F bited -1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Niwari 211,631 112,807 98,824 189,006 100,696 88,310 22,625 12,111 10,514 301 259 2 Tahsil l Jatara 257,176 136,981 120,195 239,704 127,680 112,024 17,472 9,301 8,171 349 299 2 Tahsil 3 Tikamgarh 268,174 141,683 126,491 218,861 115,693 103,168 49,313 25,990 23,323 347 311 2 Tahsil Total: District 736,981 391,471 345,510 647,571 344,069 303,502 89,410 47,402 42,008 997 869 6 The average population per village works put Niwari Tahsil: to 745 wh,ch is much above the Stale aveTage 01 582. Jcltara tah,n has Ihe highest average of 802 pel sons Niwari has been declared as a Notified Area vide Govt. of M.P. Nolification No. 391/18/275 per viJI~ge, whIle Tlkamgarh tahs I has the lowest of dated 26 5.1975. This bas been formed by including 704. Niwari occupies the intermediate pusltion area of tW) VIllages viz., Harshman (1971 L.c. No. WIth an average of 730 persons per vIlIJge. The district is not there[ lre characterised with preponde 177) and Niwari (1971 L.C. No. 183) and as such ramly small sized VIllages. The percem"l\e of urban these two villages have been eltcluded from the list ot villaoes of Niwari tahsil at the 1981 Census. population to lotal population of the di~1rict IS merely 1 .13 as "gainst the Slate average of 20.29 Jatara Tahsil: per cent. It follows (htlt the district is predomin antly rural in cl:mracter. (i) J tara has been declared as a Notified Area by including the area of two villages viz., Jatara There has been no jurisdicti nal change in the (19'71 L.e. No 253) and Marlansagar (1971 L C No. distdct "oundary betw en 1971-81. As againsf 1,003 254) vide Gf'vt of M.P. Notification No. 55~/ 81 i Villages in 1971 there are now 997. The difference dated 1.12.1974. in tne number of villages tahsllwise has been given belnw and the reasons there, 'f : (ii) Simil"rly the 1WO villllges of Palerahar (1971 L.C. No. 3 16) and Palerdkhas (1971 L.c. No. Table 1.t 318) have heen no1ifi-d to constotute Palera Notified ,Area vide Gov!. of M P. N >tificali n No ~ 54JI8/2f79 No. of villages dated 21.6.1979. Sl Distriet/ ,----...... ----, 1971 1981 Difference No. Tah.il Therefore the four villages mentioned above 2 3 4 5 hwe been excluded from the li-t ,f Villages at tht 1981 Census and hence the difference. 1 Niwari Tahsil 303 301 -2 2 .Jatara Tahsil 353 349 -4 3 Tikamgarh Tahsil 347 347 District Total 1,003 997 ------6 XXIII The following table gives the area, density and Madhya Pradesh is 4,626.6 sq.km. which differs from proportion of urban population tahsilwise. that (5,048.0 sq. km.) supplied by the Surveyor General of India. The difference is due to non Table 1.2 availability of reserve forest ared, tahsilv;ise. Accor ding to village papers, lQ80-81 the district contains Area. density and proportion of urban popUlation, 1981 only 5.12 per cent of its geographical area under forests, that too in small patches. il. Tahsil Area' in Density Proportion No. sq. km. per of urban Niwari is relatively densely populated tahsil with sq. km. population agriculturally prosperous tract while Jatara is th. 1 Niwari Tahsil 1,171.3 181 10.69 spusely populated tahsil. 2 Jatara Tahsil 1.739.0 148 6.79 The proportion of urban population in the 3 Tikamgarh Tahsil 1,716.3 156 18.39 disrtict is very low (12.13 percent) as compared to District Total: 4,626.6 159 12.13 the State average 0120 29 por cent. With the addi "Supplied by Commissioner. Land Record., Madhya Pradesh tion of 5 towns at tbe 1981 Census, there has been a· spurt in urbanisation during the decade 1971-81. The total geographical area of the district as Th. following table gives the cla~si:fication or supplied by tne Commissioner, Land Records, towns by size-class of population. Table 1.3 Classific.tion of towns by Size-Class of Population Size-class Location Name of town Population of town in tahsil .-_:_------..A..-______--, P~rsons Males Females -----_._---2 3 4 5 6 Class III (20,000-49,999) Tikamllarh Tikamgarh (M) 42,354 22.335 20,019 Class IV (10.000-19;999) Niwari Prithvipur (N. A.) 12.163 6,493. S,670 Niwari (N.A.) 10,462 5.618 4,844 Class V (5.000-9.999) Jatara latara (N.A.) 9,536 5,084 4,452 Patera (N.A.) 7.936 4,217 3,719 Tikamgarh Khargapur (N.A.) 6,959 3,655 3,304 Tlkamg"rh is the Only town continuiolZ as ~uch declassified at the next Census of 1961 wheJl the since 190 I I'lilt it had ~ very retarded g'ow'h during eliglbilitv test became rigourous. After a period of 1901 to 1951. It is dfter 1951 'hat the growth b"s 20 years boto have fulfilled the necessary crit~ria been quite satisfdctory. Niwdri and Jatara were fH bei 'g treated as tow" at this Census. Palera treated as'towns for the first time in 1'151 Crnsu5 and Khargapur are, however, new towns added for but had a very shon lite. Both these towns got the fim t'me in 1981 Censu~. XXIV The following table gives the decadal change in distribution of population. TABLE 2 Decadal Cbange in Distribution of Population Population ,------...... ------, Percentage decadal 1971 1981 Variation (1971-81) S1. Name of r------.A..------, ,------...... ------, ,---___J>-.. _____-, No.------Tahsil Total_-_._- Rural Urban Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 Niwari Tahsil 157,697 157.697 211,631 189,006 22.625 +34.20 +19.85 2 Jatara Tahsil 199,253 199.153 257,176 239,704 17,472 +29.07 +20.30 Tikam,am Tahsil 211,935 a4,030 27,905 268,174 218,861 49,313 +26.54 +18.93 +76.71 ------.,. ------,~~ Total 568,885 540,980 27.905 736,981 647,571 89,410 +29.55 +19.70 +220.41 The district has registered a higher growth rate sterilisation since the inception of the scheme till of 29 55 per cent as compared to the State average 1,981 was 20,858 and H1US the sterilisati~\n rate per of 25.27 during the decade 1971-81. This has been 1,000 population works out to 28.32 which is much an all-time high during the last eighty years. There below the State avera!;e of 52.09. does not seem to be a very favourable response of the people towards family welfare programmes. This The following table gives the decadal growth of is evident from the fact that the performance of population of the (li~trict since 1901. Table 2.1 Decadal growth of population since 1901 Census Population %Decadal year growth-rate 2 1901 326,139 1911 334,609 + 2.69 1921 288,901 -13.66 1931 317,059 + 9.75 1941 354,9n +11.96 1951 366,165 + 3.15 1961 455,662 +24.44 1971 568,885 +24.85 19 81 736,981 +29.55 xxv The district had a chequered growth of popula appears to be due to the prevalence of malaria and tion till 1951 and thereafter there has been a spurt that the climate of the area not being particularly in the growth rate. Consequent upon the merger healthy. Capt C.E Luard has mentioned in the of princely State of O(chha and formation of Orchha State Gazetteer (P-3) "The cimate of Orchha Vindbya Prade~h, a Part-C State in the Indian (territory comprising Tikrmgarh district) is said not Union, there has been an administrative shake-up to be particularly healthy, especially that of the 'whereb) this territory wa, opened up tor various north-western section wbere the inhabitants suffer develc)p'1lental activities. Mmement of p"pLllativn severely from malaria throughout the year*." also became frequent and thus the district had an Further thi, fact has been corroborated in 1951 by accelerated growth of population from 1961 onward. Shri N K. Dube, then Superintendent of Ceusus Operations, Vmdhya Pradesh while making an ob~er Looking back to the trend of population growth vatioD on "Natu' al increase Births and Ol'aths" "No in tbe early p ttt of this century, it i~ observed that vital statistics are avaIlable. In the decade there tile growth during 19D1-11 had been very low (2.60 was no serious epidemic and there was no famine. per cent). Tnis appear'! to be d,ue to severe famine Cholera appears in summer after the rains in of 1905-19')6 whi,h Was preceded by a severe frost the towns and spread, to neighbouring villages. in 1901-1905 ~esulting in mass exodus of population Inoculations against cholera and plague are given in from this tract. the towns to only a part of the popUlation. Malaria takes its toll everywhere. There is hardly any Villa Tile 1911-21 decade: has registered a decline of ger who d 'es not 5uffer from malana during <;eptem 13.66 per cent. Though no evidence is available ber ani Oct<,ber and suffers from its effects for 2 Or about thi 1 tract but the entire ,tate was gripped 3 months. Agricultural operatiom suffer very much with plague-epidemic during the early years 01 the on accou( of malaria ,,** deCide and later the fat!1 influenza epidemic of 1919-20. N dure's cruel spell took more than its fare It is therefore evident that during the first half sh lre which had literally dedmated the population. of the century the scourge of malaria remained in It is ill all pro"'ahility that the -rea comprising thIS territory. During the la'er period, h 'wever, Ti){amgifh di,trict was not free from this upheaval the district !Nas free from su_h upheaval, and there and thu~ there had been" a decrease of population was a steady growth of p"pulation from 1951 by 13.66 per cent at the count ot 1921, onward. Moreover the exp 1U~lOn of m dical servi ce., execution of puhlic health programmes and The II f owth of pcpulation during the decades devei, ·pment of agriculture, industn and allied acti IQ21-31, 1931-41 and 1941-51 had been slow. Though VIties through suc(;e,sive Five Year Plan, have attri there does no' seem to be m Ijor upheavals like that buted tJ higher growth rdte of population dUTIng flf of t"e earlier dec1de~ b'lt the slow rate grr'lwth these year~. ·Orchha Stale Gazetteer by Cap. C.B. Luard 1907(P-37) "'·Census oflndia, 1951 Vol. XVI Vindhya Pradesh. Part-I Report and subsidiary Tables by N.i:. Dube, Superintendent of Census Operation., Vindhya Prade&k. .' XXVI The following table gives the distribution of villages by population ranges: TABLE 3 DistributioD of ,mages by popnlatiOll rPees Tikamgarh District Niwari Tahsil latara Tahsil ,---_-.A._____ , Tikamgarh Tahsil llang,e of ~_-_.A.--_-, ,-:---_..A.. _____ , ~----..A.._---, Population No. of Pexccutag,c No. of Pcxcent",e No. of Percentage No. of Petcentalle villages in . villages in villages in villages in each rlnge eacl! ranle each range elch range 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 Le16 than 100 148 17.03 46 17.76 43 14.38 59 18.97 200-499 269 30.96 73 28.18 95 31.77 101 32.48 jOQ-I,999 404 46."9 114 47.88 144 48.16 136 43. '13 2,000-4,999 45 5.18 16 6.13 15 5.02 14 ".50 5,000-9,999 3 0.34 ! 0.67 0.3" 10,000+ Total 869 100.00 259 100.00 299 100.00 311 100.00 Tikamgarh is a district characterised with vlllages in the district works out to 5.18 which is not medium sized villages as the villages having popula a significant proportion. The propo rtion of 'very lation in the range 500-1,999 account for 46.49 per big' villages is insignificant. The proportion of 'big' cent of the total mlmber of villages in the district. villages is highest (6.18 per cent) in Niwari tahsil. Jatara tahsil has the highest proportion (48.16 per Of the three very big villages in the cistrict, two viz, cent) of villages lying in this population range. The Lidhora Khas (L.C. No. 160) and Chanderkhas villages in this tahsil are relatively bigger as compa (L.C. No. 172) in Jatara tahsil and the other one viz, red to the other two tahsils viz, Niwari and Tikam Karikhas (L.C. No.5) is in Tikamgarh tahsil. garh. If we take the villages coming under the These three villages may· be treated as town at the population range 2,000-4,999 as 'big' and tbose in the 1991 Census provided they qualify the eligibility test range 5,000-9,999 as 'very big' then the share of biLl laid down for the purpose. XXVII The following table gives the distribution of villages by density. TABLE 4 Distribution of Villages by Density Tikamgarh District Niwari Tahsil latara Tahsil Tikalllga.rh Tahsil ,.-___.A. ___--, Range of r-----.A.---, r----.A.----, r----.A.-----, Density Total No. Percentale Total No. Percentage Total No. PerceDta!;C Total No. Percentaae per Iq.km.) of villages of villa!;ell of Villages of viii ales in each Taole in each range in each range in each fanlle 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 Less than -1 0 :'6 2.99 6 2.32 10 3.34 HI 3.21 11-20 22 2.53 !I 3.48 2.68 5 Lei 21-30 68 7.83 10 3.86 26 8.69 32 10.29 51 -100 167 19.22 37 14.29 54 18.06 76 24.44 101-200 366 42.12 104 40.15 125 41.11 137 44.0S 201-300 138 15.88 58 22.39 44 14.72 36 IU7 301-500 64 7.36 28 10.81 2S 8.36 H 3.54 501+ 18 2.07 7 2.70 7 2.14 4 1.29 Not known Total 869 100.00 259 !OO.OO 299 100.00 311 00.00 Since the .. mages in this district are mostly ases, the number of villages lying under each range medium size, majority of them are in the density is more or less found to be steadily increasing till range 101-200. This accounts for 42.12 per cent the range 101-200 and thereafter with the increase in of the total nu mber of villages. the density range the number is found to be decreas ing. Tikamgarh tahsil has the highest proportion of It may be noted that as the density range inere- villages falling under the density Tallie IOJ-WO. XXVIII The following table gives the proportion of Scheduled Castes population to total population in the villages. TABLE 5 Proportion of Scheduled Castes' population to total population in the villages Percentage range Tikamgarh Districl Niwari Tahsil Jalara Tahsil Tikamgarh Tahsil of Scheduled Castes ,----.-1..-__-. ,-----'------, ,----A----. ,-_--A----. population No. of Percen- No. of Percen No. of Percen- No. of Percen- to total population "ii1ages lage villages tage villages lege villages tage in each in each in each in each range range range range 2 3 6 7 9 Nil 130 14.96 49 18.92 37 12.38 44 14.15 0-5 61 7.02 22 3.49 19 6.35 20 6.43 i-10 65 7.48 22 8.49 14 4.68 29 9.32 10-15 97 11.16 35 13.51 21 7.02 41 13.18 16-20 111 12.71 11.20 40 13.38 42 13.51 21-30 202 23.25 45 17.38 8l 2743 75 24.12 31 and above 203 23.36 '57 22.01 86 28.76 60 19.29 Total 869 100.00 259 100.00 299 100.00 100.00 The proportion of scheduled ca&tes population With the increase in tne percentage range of sche in the district is ll.71 per cent which is much higher duled castes population, the number "f villages than the Slate average of 14.52 per cent. Even falling under each range i~ f lU'1d to he increasing with thiS high proportion, there are 130 (14.96 per whIch seems to be due t 1 hIgher concentration of cent) villages out of a total uf ~69 which do not scheduled castes pJl1ulatlon in bigger villages. have any schedllled castes population in them. XXIX The following table will help in corroborating the statement made above. Table 5.1 Number of villages, population and scheduled castes by population range of villages Range of No. of Total Rural Scheduled %of Scheduled population villages Population Castes Castes to total Population Population 2 3 4 Leis than 200 148 15,319 ,2,440 15.93 200-499 26') 93,469 19,683 21.06 500-999 250 177,252 38,765 21.87 1,000-1,999 154 212,051 48,815 23.02 2,000-4,999 45 131,949 30,163 22.86 5,000-9,999 17,531 4,165 23.76 10,OOO_! Total 869 647,571 144,031 12.24 By and large, a similar pattern of distribution of scheduled castes population exists in all the tbree tahsils of the district. xxx The following table gives the proportion of Scheduled Tribes population in villages. TABLE 6 Proportion of Scheduled Tribes Population to Total Population in tbe Villages Percentage Range Tikamgarh District Niwari Tahsil Jatara Tahsil Tikamgarh Tahsil of Scheduled Tribe ,,----.A.----, ,,----.A.___ , ,..----...... ---, ,..----.A.-~ population to No. of Percentage No. of Percentage No. of Percentage No. of Percenta&e total population villages villages villages villages in each in each in each in each range range range range l 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Nil 439 50.52 143 55.21 154 5UI 142 45.66 0-5 195 22.44 55 21.24 66 22.07 74 J3.79 6-15 140 16.11 34 13.13 '0 16.72 56 18.00 16-25 50 5.75 16 6.18 17 5.69 17 5.47 26-35 29 3.34 7 2.70 9 3.01 13 4.13 36-50 9 1.04 4 1.54 5 1.61 51 and above 7 0.80 1.00 4 1.29 Total 869 100.00 259 100.00 299 100.00 311 100.00 The prop ·rtlon of scheduled trihes population p"pulation accounting for 50.52 per cent of the total to total populatIon of the oistrict (451 per cent) is number of vill'ges. The pr portion of sur.h villages significantly lower than the State average of 27.87 IS hight'st (55.21 per cent) in Niwari tahsil while it per cent. is lowest (45.61.1 per cent) JQ Tikamgarh tahsil. It is obviou~ly because the concentration of schedul'd There are as many 8S 4' 9 out of a tota I of 869 tnbe~ population is highest in Tikamgarh tahsil and villages which are without any scheduled tribes lowest In Niwari tahSIl XXXI It may be noted that with the increase in tbe i~ probably dae to the fact that smaller villages have populalion range, the number of vjllages falling greater concentration of scheduled tribes popula under each and the pr!'portion of scheduled tribes tion. This is evident from the following figures. population in them is found to be decreasing which Table 6.1 Number of villages, population and scheduled tribes by population range of villages Range of No. of Total rural Scheduled %or Scheduled Tribes population villages population Tribes population population 2 3 4 5 LeSi than 200 148 15,319 742 4.84 200-499 269 93,469 6,214 6.55 500-999 250 177,252 8,396 4.74 1,000-1.999 154 212,OS1 9,304 4.39 2,000-4,999 45 131.949 3,957 3.00 5,000-9,999 3 17,531 598 3.41 10,000+ Total 869 647,571 29,211 4.51 XXXII The following table gives the proportion of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes population.in towns. TABLE 7 Proportion of Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes population in towns 'Name of the Total Total Total Percentage of Percentage of Town ,. population Scheduled Scheduled Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes Castes Tribes population to total population to Population Population population total populati g 2 3 4 5 6 Jatara 9,536 1,430 151 15.00 1.58 Khargapur 6,9~9 1,108 15.'12 Niwari 10,462 3,101 175 29.64 1.67 Palera 7,936 2,096 396 26.41 4.99 Prithvipur 12,163 2,712 341 22.30 2.80 Tikarngarh 42,354 5,4'9 368 12.98 0.87 All Towns 89,410 15,946 1,431 17.83 1.60 Except for fikamgarh, Jatara, Khargapur, the obviously because these are just grown up villages. traditional rural pattern of concentration of SC/ST . The [.ll1owing table' gives the littHacy rate by population is visible in all the towns of the district pJpUlalion range. TABLE 8 Literacy rate by population ranges of villages Range of Tikamgarh District Niwari Tabsil Jatara Tah.il Tikamgarh Tahsil ,.-___.A.. ____, population ,----..A..----, ,---..A.-----. r----..A..--~ No, of Literacy No, of Literacy No. of Literacy No. of Literacy villages in vi11age~ in villases in villages in each range each range each range each range 2 4 6 7 8 9 ~~-..---- Less than-200 148 11.89 46 13.46 43 12.86 59 10.27 200-499 269 13.94 73 14.64 95 14.94 101 12.53 500-1,999 404 15.51 124 19.38 144 14.57 136 13.10 2,000-4,999 45 19.48 16 22.49 15 17.67 14 18.33 5,000-9,999 3 22.19 2 24.33 1 17.41 10,000+ Total 869 16.19 259 19.34 299 15.69 311 14.01 XXXIII The literacy rate in rural areas of the district is Literacy is generally associated with urbanisa 16.19 which is far below the State average of 21.22 tion. Greater the urbanisation of an area higher is per cent. The district has to strive hard to come the literacy rate there. This is by and large true in up to the level of State average. respect of various towns of the district. The f )lIo wing inset gives the ranking of the size of population With the increase in the population ranpe, the and literacy rate in towns of the district. literacy rate is found to he incre~sing successively. This is obviously beCause bigger villages are generally Table 9.1 equipped with better educ .tional amenities. The low literacy rate tn smaller villages is not however solely Ranking of size of population and literacy rate on a::count of non-availability of educational ameni ties but also because of lack of awareness among the SI. Name of Town Ranking of Literacy Rate No. Population rural mass. 2 3 4 . Among the tahsils, the position is not worse so Jatara 4 3 far as Niwari is concerned but the other two tahsils 2 Khargapur 6 4 viz Jatara and Tikamg.1rh are very poor in the field 3 Niwari 3 :1. of educarjon. 4 Palera 5 6 5 Prithvipur 2 5 The following table gives 1he literacy rates for 6 Tikamgarh 1 towns. TABLE 9 Name of the Town Literacy rates 2 Jatara 36.20 Khargapur 31.57 Niwari 37.84 Palera 28.30 Prithvillur 28.93 Tikamgarh 49.56 All TOtl'D 40.67 XXXIV The following table gives the literates, wOlkers, non-workers, Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes. TABLE Literates, Workers, Non-workers Scheduled Castes! PERCEN ,------S.C. S.T. Main worker~ Population Population Literates to total to total Name of Totall Total Population to total to total Population Population District{ Rural/ ,-----..A..---, popu\a- popula- ,.---..A..---, ,-----A.---, Tahsil Urban P M F tion lion l' M F P M F 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 7 Tikamgam T 736,981 39 t ,471 345,510 21.71 <1.16 19.16 28.61 8.44 34.79 53.26 13.87 . District R 647,571 344,069 303,502 22.24 4.51 16.19 25.44 5.70 35.69 54.42 14.46 U 89,410 47,402 42,008 17.83 1.60 40.67 51.68 28.24 21.28 44.82 9.61 Niwari T 211,631 112,807 98,824 22.59 3.98 20.80 31.51 8.58 35.25 52.71 15.32 Tahsil R 189,006 100,696 88,310 22.22 4.18 19.34 30.05 7.12 35.95 B.30 16.18 U 22,625 12,111 10,514 25.69 2.28 33.05 43.66 20.83 29.41 47.86 8.16 2 Jatara T 257,176 136,981 120,195 24.43 4.32 16.89 26.06 6.33 34.91 53.44 13.79 Tahsil R 239,704 127,680 112,024 24.74 4.41 15.69 24.80 5.30 35.16 53.97 13.72 U 17,472 9,301 8,171 20,18 3.13 32.61 43.26 20.49 31.48 46.19 14.7-' 3 Tikamgarh T 268,174 141,683 126,491 18.40 4.14 20.08 28.78 10.33 34.32 53.52 12.81 Tahsil R 218,861 115,693 103,168 19.53 4.90 14.01 22.12 4.91 36.05 55.90 13.79 U 49,313 25,990 23,323 13.40 0.75 47.02 58.43 34.31 26.63 42.9! 8.48 xxxv 10 Scheduled Tribes Population in tbe district TAGE ..A..--_-______• Marginal workers to Total workers to Non-workers to total total populati on total population population Name of Total/ ,---_.A.. ___ ---, ,----..A.-___ , ,----..A.----, District! Rural/ p M F P M F p M F Tahsil Uaban 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 2 7.33 1.21 14.26 42.12 54.47 28.13 57.88 45.53 71.87 Tikamgarh T 7.96 1.26 15.57 43.66 55.68 30.03 56.34 44.32 69.97 District R 2.74 0.88 4.84 31.02 45.70 14.46 68.98 54.30 85.54 U 5.15 0.72 10.20 40.44 53.43 25,52 59,60 46.57 74.48 Niwari T 5.38 0.77 10.63 41.33 54.07 26.81 58.67 45.93 73.19 Tahsil R 3.19 0.26 6.57 32.60 48.11 14.73 67.40 51.89 85.27 U 7.77 1.28 15.16 42.68 54.72 28.95 57.32 45.28 71.05 Jatara T 8.08 1.30 15.82 43.25 55.27 29.54 56.75 44.73 70.46 Tahsil R 3.42 1.08 6.09 34.90 47.26 20.83 65.10 52.74 79.17 U 8.63 1.53 16.58 42.95 55.05 29.39 57.05 44.95 70.61 TikamSarh T 10.06 1.63 19.51 46.11 57.53 33.30 53.89 42.47 66.70 Tahsil R 2.29 1.10 3.62 28.92 44.02 12.10 71.08 55.98 87.90 U lXXXVI The population of the district is 736981 which .he nonhern palt of the Stat~ which region is prone constitutes 1.41 per cent of tbe total population of to adver~.: sex-ratio. the State, the district has gained its po~ition from 40th rank in 1971 to 39th at the 1981 Census. The scx-rd.io in the di'lrict has always been lower than that for the st'lle as a whole. But for Tikamgarh is the big~est tahsil in the district 1911, the ~~x-rati<.) has be. u successively declining and Niwari, the smallest. ff( m Cen.>m to Cen'lUs right from :901 to 1971 and Sex-ratio: in 1981 the Jeclining trelld if checked and an impro vement is noticed. The ~ex-ratio ie. the number of females per 1,000 males in the district works out to 883 which is The followiu!1, tclble give, a comparative picture much lower than the State average of 941. Lying in of the sex-ratio in the district and State since 1901, Table 10.1 Sex-ratio in State and district, 1901-81 ____ ~o~ __ ..... _____ .. ,~~-- .---~--- . . "-- " .. .. . Madhya Pradesh Tikamgarh District ,------.A.. ______-, ,------..A...------, Census Year Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban 2 3 4 6 7 -'-"------,,,_,,_.----"'---"'------1901 990 995 937 941 939 977 1911 986 991 913 957 958 934 1921 974 982 878 932 932 930 1931 973 983 872 926 925 963 1941 970 980 882 921 921 913 1951 967 975 907 911 909 949 1961 953 970 856 906 906 914 1971 941 956 868 877 876 898 1981 HI 95€i 884 8~3 882 886 With the change in the trend in 1981, it is hoped Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes: that tbe adversities towards females will further get reduced owing to expansion of medical strvi;es and Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes respec extension of public health programmes. Onc of the tively cO'lstitute 21.71 per cent and 4.16 per cent of important reasons of the adverse sex-ratio being the total popuiation of the district a. against the neglect of female babies which attitude is gradually correspolding State averages of 1410 per cent and hding though the urge for male babies may continue 2"1.97 per cent. It is a pe.culiar feature of this State to persist. that where the proportiol1 of scheduled castes popu lation is high the proportion of scheduled tribes Urban anas generally exhibit a low sex·ratio which population is corre~pondingly low. This is what the trait is n)t difficult to understand but so far as situ Ilion that prevails in Tika:: 'parh district. Tikamgarh district is concerned, the.position is other wise. The Sex-ratio haq generally been higher in As :tf.:ainst the growth of 19.7', per cent of the urban areas as compared to that in rural areas. This total population of the distnct during the decade is obviously because the district lies in the \'ery low 1971-81 the growth among the scheduled castes sex-ra.tio region and thus the rULl) areas exhibit this populatiol1 has been rec· rded as :7.69 per cent, traditional pattern. This high growth is not because of any biological XXXVll phenomenon but because of the arca lcstfictiC'ns in Literacy: respect of a number of Scheduled Castes ilaving The literacy rate has moved up from 14.04 per been removed. For example Kba1'grr. Kancra and cent in 1'>11 to 19.16 p,:r cent in 1981 showing an Mirdha; Khatik; Koli, Kori etc which wcre not increase of 36.47 per CCI 1. Though a good stride scheduled in 1971 Census were no, ~llUmer,lted as has been m1de in this fieid but there is yet much to Scheduled Castes then but in view of th' ~ mend b,: desired, The fOJillWi Ii', tuLle gi~es .he literacy ment Act of 1976 they have been tre~.ted as buch at rates for the State and Tikamgarh district for total, the 1981 Census, tht1reby proliferating the figllres of ru,d and urb"n popula ion a,ld also by sex. Scheduled Castes population now. Table 10.2 Literacy rates 1981 ------Madhya Pradesh Tikamgarl:t District ,-----_-___ ..A.. ______, r------..A.. ------, Total/R ural IU rban Persons Males Females Persons Males Females 2 4 6 7 Total population 27,87 39.49 15.53 19.16 .28.61 8.44 Rural population 21.22 32.91 8.99 16.1'1 25.44 5.70 Urban population 54.02 64.41 42.26 40,67 51.68 28.24 The district is still far behind in terms of literacy them belt of Ihe district whe! e thl>' participation rate rates for totaL rural and ur'x:n population and for among females is very low as compared to other both the sexes as coo-,pared to that in the State as a areas, it has to be Doted that this district shows a whole. Among t i1 e tahsils, Niwari has higbe~t literacy departure fr ,:m that. The participrti0n rate is fairly rate in re~ pec! of rur;:l population for both the ~exes good among females in this district which is probably while in the case of mba\! pO::lulation the rat,~s are because of the predominant agrarian economy. highest in Tikamgarh tahsil for Doth the sexes, There is hardly any industry worth the name it) the obviously because the latter has relativeh large pro district. Agriculture is the mainstay of the popula portion of Ul b to population as compared to the tion in this district as 85.34 per cent of tt.e total other two tahsils. main workers are engaged in cultivation (Cultivation and ag'icul!ural labourers take .. together). wheat Participiation Rate: is the most important crup grow 1 in the district The definition of workers, marginal workers and which accounts for 24.89 per cent of the total non-workers has already been given at the beginning cropped area. lowar and Rice respectively form of this note. the s~conJ and Ihird important crops of the district '" ith 13.58 peF cent and 10.19 per cent of the total The palticipia1ion rate i.e. the percentage of area, Only 3.06 per cent of the total main workers workers (main workers and marginal workers taken are engaged iil Household Industry while other Wo[ together) to total population of tne di,trict works kers con~dtute 11.60 per oent of the total main wor out to 42.12 per ceut as ag:tinst the S'atc :perage- of kers, The district is therefMe predominantly rural 49.49 per' cent. Though the; district lie; ill the nor- iu character. POSillON L'f TAHSil HIWAAI IN ~mlCT MADHYA PUDESH . "!AMG~RH A TAHSIL NIWARI DISTRICT TIKAMGARH 14...... c ~"Im • rn-1.tI.OlllnI!t5 10 I REFERENCE TAHSIL ...... _ ••-_._ VILLAGE WITM LOCAT~ COD! HUN8!R. l~'r~':_-j HUOQUAATEAS: TAHSIL ...... VILLAGE WITM POPULATIOII SIZ! mow 100i 200-499,500-999, 1000-4999...... , •• ~ UNiNHABITEO VILLAGES ...... 10 UR8AN AREA WITH LOCATION COD! 10' NATIONAL HIGHIIIIY .... STAT! HIGHWAY ...... _JI_n__ Io£TALLEC ROAD. UNMEJAlllO ROlO. .,.",.,' .. ,' ••••••• 1: AUiMY LINE WITH STATIONRlI(110 GIUGE. V """'__.L:'-- RIVER AND STRUM...... -~ 8UNOS ...... FilSI OfFICE i ~Sl AND TElEGRAPH OFFiCE ..... POLICE STAIION ...... NIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL...... PRIMARY HEALTH CENTR!, DISPENSARV. MARKET/HAT. MAOI!S .. u S I l ~m'-I'1~lm LCtAllOW W[l~ {QUI NUllai~~ 1It/1II,)tf T ~ n !MD III !111m iHmv II mil mlADi1' 01 'in~IPUR TOil. IS' 10 POSITION OF TAHSIL IITARA IN OISTIICTTIKAMGARH MADHYA fRADESH TAHSIL JATARA DISTRICT TIKAMGARH ~iFUI'" 1\07 Ii ~1(~~n~I! REFERENCE OISTlICT TAHSil .. , VILlAGE WITH lOCATION COCE KUMlER a: HEAOQUARTERS: TIHSIL. I VW,GESWITilPoPULATIOIfSIZf8fLCIIIOO; .. ill 20lH991 loo-m; 1000-4999;1000ANOI8i1lE .. 0, ••• a UNIllHiBITEOlWiES .. UlliN AREIWITH LOCATION COOE .. STATfHI;HWAY METALLED MAl UHM£TALLEOROAII .... RIVER I STREAM ... FORESTIREA •.. POSTOFFICfjPOSTANOTELfORAPHOFIlct. POLICE STATION ... HIGHER moNOAR'lSCHoOl... 1 Ho5PITAl,PRIMIRYHEllTH CENIRE,oISPENSIRyi&,i,+ _ott Iw 1 ~1~\.6! \OWI~. WI'" lOt! IUUI~I m,m, MITERNITY AN~ CHilO WElFARE CEN1RE .•... ~tlA~ D~mDW1~ 1m • All "um WHIm u 0' 'Alii) iARmfHATI~~NOIES", rI 1itT-71u' ~'I'. --t.____.L_---+-:-----l------J,,---+-~_::±r_.]1~ ~~ ~ Pa~TION OF TAHSIL TIKIMiARH IN DISTRICTTIKAi6ARH MADHYA PRAD~5H ii /5~,,~ TAHSIL TIKAMGARH '::HIWI!I'(\\. \ (LJ~ DISTRICT TlKAMGARH \·rl ... .J \ ) JIIIII , , I 0 2 • 6i!U.f$ \. ~ ... ! :i! ! 0 ~ 4 , 'KiloIlTMs 50' 0. c REFiRENIt BOUNDAIIY: STAT£' .. ~STRICT. .' TIHSIL .... ~LLAGE WITIILOOOIO~ :tn ~OC;. C:~.) HEADQUARTERS.OISTRICT,TAHSIL .....•..•... VILLAGES WITH POPULATION Sllr il,L~ ~~, : : 201r499,100·m,10QIr4999,lOOO I j~IW("" I •• '1 i UNINIlABIT!D VILLAGE!...... t I UR51N AREA WITH LOCinoo CIIOL.... .~ I STAT! H~IIWIL ...... ~.1'"-. ! METALLED ROAD ...... o UNM£1ALLEO ROAD...... •...... ,.'''~ • 1 ::~T::::~~:O.S: .. A,:O,,:.t,~:~P~'~'ICI,.·.·,~~~~: _1• 1 HliHERSECONOIRVSCHOOL ...... 1 HOSPiTAl I PRliARV HEALTH CENTRE , ~IP~NUIV .. , ~ • + iATERMTV ANO CHILli wmm C'~TRI ...... ""." i 14' 11'1),' rJ ..... 1 C':rP,Pr 'Ii're """" , __.A. __----.. 1971 1981 1971 1981 4 2 4 ---.. -~---- "_-_-_ .. _---- 7/1 ii1 31 ~TIOT1T 211 209 32 ~T'!P."l 176 171 266 264 31'F""'H'1T 265 262 33 iI;.,-iTr 2 3f'! 1/~ 1~5 183 3!nrfr _v~ J6~ 35 >FIT 4 arnrit lOT" 105 10' 36 37 WAAr 'OT'f 119 118 135 135 6 38 f~T"![Gr(~) 7 68 68 39 f\'J'ir;r 8 151 151 40 ~?:T~ 9 ::;;1!fr 1·\6 146 41 .;;; 132 131 42 l[lT<:f 263 261 43 l[OO 166 161 44 17T';:fu;fr 110 110 10 alfmT 21 21 141 45 ~f 1-10 • 0 1~ 14 'Ii 46 'Ion] '!i'1r 47 'l-~1~T 1~ 13 16 11 'f.n'1i'; ;;r[ll 247 245 48 '!;'m 19 2:! 12 ~r '>m.1 2~8 246 49 T["i',[ 2n 301 13 'l'§tTr ~T 54 54 50 i["P-fr 7 r ilfffi 2.75 273 17) 14 'RTl'f'f 180 274 51 ~"T<:T'i['-';T 276 15 ,"c," 'Wr~f 125 124 52 1[11:T ~fir.g \lIfT 273 271 16 ,"",iTT 90 89 <[PJ "IP."T ~74 2n ' . JJ 17 oFiTT[,? ~s -' "" 54 ofl'1T WI''fl1f 283 281 18 'R'!9T 21S 216 55 ml'J'!! 291 289 19 'I7!14'1 152 153 20 ri~"-· 106 108 -n 21 ,"1'ft 'W.T,?'1 0' 39 4 "" ~J 101 101 56 11e:'Il5T 228 227 23 ~.~ 201 199 57 'l'if':T "IT'T[.,- 144 144 24 :;;"'1"-1 293 290 58 'l'llJT IFe: 2'J4 145 145 25 ~'q"-'I'T ~ 292 59 'i'lI'll1lTffi 26 'lj''! "'·iiTiI'i;:rr~ '1T~ IXI;rr ifif ~ nl..fi'l ;f, [3 'f' ".---...... -.~,..,...... ,.,. ~~-..------_.._,...... 4 2 711 f;:r'l"T¥T ~;ft;;r 160 160 ·83 E2 96 m'nl l1[ffi 62 :q~'~.~; ~F1 299 299 97 ~~-;-:~ '~TCi 1()~ 163 63 ""''''I"'l '!Iel 18 :.() 9S m'r 44 47 64 "!~ 42 41 65 'i'I""lT'ff:011<::! 147 148 105 fu";;m 200 198 106 i!"ln:TJ 1·29 130 51 49 74 ~ 40 107 cRr~~ 120 120 ;;r;fu;r! 40 75 102 14 17 108 ~~ 102 76 ;;r~;;qt 19m 15 15 109 0IcflWT (ift't~) 227 225 77 ;;r1j;f.1