DOCSLIB.ORG

[71] Erasmus the Sophist?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
[71] Erasmus the Sophist? Erasmus the Sophist? by Eric MacPhail sophists were professional educators whose reputation was established byThe their enemies. This factor leads to a number of complications in as- sessing their activity and their legacy. From the time of Plato, sophist or uo+LuT1js was a term of derision and reproach, carrying connotations of a mercenary and amoral facility with language. This reputation was transmit- ted to the Renaissance under the authority of Xenophon, Plato, Aristotle, and Cicero, so that by the time of Erasmus, sophist was an invidious title which the humanists were eager to concede to their institutional rivals, the scholastics. Indeed, as Erika Rummel reminds us, we find "sophist" applied as a term of mutual reproach in the humanist-scholastic debated Yet at the same time some of the ancient sophists managed to retain a resilient prestige and to elicit the admiration of a wide spectrum of Renaissance readers and editors, so that the sophist can be said to have served as both example and counterexample for both the humanists and their adversaries. In his own work Erasmus fully exemplifies the complex and contradictory legacy of the sophists, for he makes frequent use of the pejorative and polemical connota- tion of "sophist" even as he proudly inscribes himself in the pedagogical and rhetorical tradition of the First and Second Sophistic. It is this tension which I propose to examine by discussing Erasmus' use of the Latin term sophista as well as his undeniable affinity for the teachings of the ancient sophists. In particular I will try to elucidate his appropriation of the concept of kairos so crucial to the early sophists and to show how Erasmus followed a precise humanist model in his appropriation of sophistic techniques. In this way I hope to re-evaluate the legacy of the sophists and to re-emphasize the rhetor- ical and philological side of Erasmus' humanism. In his fragmentary dialogue known as the Academica, Cicero furnished Latin humanism with a concise definition of the sophists as philosophers with an ulterior motive. In the early version of the dialogue, which goes by [71] 72 the name of Lucullus, Cicero distinguishes the noblest philosophers such as Anaxagoras from the sophists, who philosophize for the sake of gain or for showing off: "nos autem ea dicimus nobis videri quae vosmet ipsi nobilissimis philosophis placuisse conceditis. Anaxagoras nivem nigram dixit esse ... at quis est? num hic sophistes (sic enim appellabantur ii qui ostentationis aut quaestus causa philosophantur)?" (Academica 2.23.72).2 This parenthetical disparagement of the sophists is faithful to the polemic initiated by Socrates' disciples Plato and Xenophon in the early fourth century BC. In Plato's dia- logue Sophistes, the Eleatic stranger enumerates the attributes of the sophist, calling him first a hunter of the young and rich, secondly a merchant of knowledge, thirdly a retailer, and fourthly a setf-satesman or autopoles (231d), in each instance emphasizing the profit motive of sophistry. Xenophon con- firms this reputation in his Memorabilia, where Socrates in debate with An- tiphon compares the sophist, who sells wisdom, to the pornos or prostitute, who sells beauty (1.6.13). The author of the treatise on hunting entitled Kynegetikos, usually attributed to Xenophon, sums up the whole antisophist tradition when he declares, in the conclusive chapter to his work, where it is not clear why he should mention the sophists, that the worst thing about the sophists is that they are proud to be called sophists, a name which to any right-thinking person is an insult or a shame, oneidos (13.8). The name of sophist retained its potency as an insult even when the sophists themselves had been long defunct, replaced by their descendants the modern professors of rhetoric and philosophy. One of the major conduits for the transmission of the antisophist polemic from antiquity to the Renaissance was Marsilio Ficino's epitome of Plato's dialogue Protagoras. Here Ficino re- groups all the Platonic commonplaces against the sophists from the Gorgias, Hippias, Euthydemus, and elsewhere, providing a handy guide for subsequent vilifications of the sophists. He especially emphasizes the characterization of the sophists as salesmen, "quasi disciplinarum mercatores et caupones."? Crit- ics have acknowledged Ficino's ambivalence in the humanist-scholastic de- bate, and his divided allegiances may have facilitated the free circulation of the epithet "sophist" in the sixteenth century.4 It is curious to remark how .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Teachers' Pay in Ancient Greece
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers from the University Studies series (The University of Nebraska) University Studies of the University of Nebraska 5-1942 Teachers' Pay In Ancient Greece Clarence A. Forbes Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/univstudiespapers Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University Studies of the University of Nebraska at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers from the University Studies series (The University of Nebraska) by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Teachers' Pay In Ancient Greece * * * * * CLARENCE A. FORBES UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA STUDIES Ma y 1942 STUDIES IN THE HUMANITIES NO.2 Note to Cataloger UNDER a new plan the volume number as well as the copy number of the University of Nebraska Studies was discontinued and only the numbering of the subseries carried on, distinguished by the month and the year of pu blica tion. Thus the present paper continues the subseries "Studies in the Humanities" begun with "University of Nebraska Studies, Volume 41, Number 2, August 1941." The other subseries of the University of Nebraska Studies, "Studies in Science and Technology," and "Studies in Social Science," are continued according to the above plan. Publications in all three subseries will be supplied to recipients of the "University Studies" series. Corre­ spondence and orders should be addressed to the Uni­ versity Editor, University of Nebraska, Lincoln. University of Nebraska Studies May 1942 TEACHERS' PAY IN ANCIENT GREECE * * * CLARENCE A.
    [Show full text]
  • Iamblichus and Julian''s ''Third Demiurge'': a Proposition
    Iamblichus and Julian”s ”Third Demiurge”: A Proposition Adrien Lecerf To cite this version: Adrien Lecerf. Iamblichus and Julian”s ”Third Demiurge”: A Proposition . Eugene Afonasin; John M. Dillon; John F. Finamore. Iamblichus and the Foundations of Late Platonism, 13, BRILL, p. 177-201, 2012, Ancient Mediterranean and Medieval Texts and Contexts. Studies in Platonism, Neoplatonism, and the Platonic Tradition, 10.1163/9789004230118_012. hal-02931399 HAL Id: hal-02931399 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02931399 Submitted on 6 Sep 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Iamblichus and Julian‟s “Third Demiurge”: A Proposition Adrien Lecerf Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France [email protected] ABSTRACT. In the Emperor Julian's Oration To the Mother of the Gods, a philosophical interpretation of the myth of Cybele and Attis, reference is made to an enigmatic "third Demiurge". Contrary to a common opinion identifying him to the visible Helios (the Sun), or to tempting identifications to Amelius' and Theodorus of Asine's three Demiurges, I suggest that a better idea would be to compare Julian's text to Proclus' system of Demiurges (as exposed and explained in a Jan Opsomer article, "La démiurgie des jeunes dieux selon Proclus", Les Etudes Classiques, 71, 2003, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Pico, Plato, and Albert the Great: the Testimony and Evaluation of Agostino Nifo EDWARD P
    Pico, Plato, and Albert the Great: The Testimony and Evaluation of Agostino Nifo EDWARD P. MAHONEY Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (1463-1494) is without doubt one of the most intriguing figures of the Italian Renaissance. It is thus no surprise that he has attracted the attention of many modern scholars. By reason of the varied interests that are reflected in his writings, contrasting interpretations of Pico have been proposed.1 Our purpose here is not to present a new and different picture of Pico but, rather, to offer a contribution to one fruitful area of research pursued by some recent historians of philosophy, namely, Pico's debt to, and 1. For general presentations of Pico's life and thought, see the classic study of Eugenio Garin, Giovanni Pico della Mirandola: Vita e dottirina (Florence: F. Le Monnier, 1937); Garin's magisterial Storia della filosofia italiana, 2d ed. (Turin: G. Einaudi 1966), 1:458-495. Among more recent general accounts are Pierre-Marie Cordier, Jean Pic de la Mirandole (Paris: Debresse, 1958); Engelbert Monnerjahn, Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (Wiesbaden: F. Steiner, 1960); Paul Oskar Kristeller, Eight Philosophers of the Italian Renaissance (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1964), pp. 54-71; Giovanni di Napoli, Giovanni Pico della Mirandola e laproblemaύca dottrinale del suo tempo (Rome: Desclee, 1965); Charles Trinkaus, In Our Image and Likeness (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970), 2:505-526; and Henri de Lubac, Pic de la Mirandole: Etudes et discussions (Paris: Aubier Montaigne, 1974). 165 166 EDWARD P. MAHONEY use of, medieval philosophy in his overall philosophical enterprise.2 Of particular concern will be the influence of Albert the Great on Pico, which can be established by a connection that has apparently not been noticed by Pico's historians.
    [Show full text]
  • Platonic Mysticism
    CHAPTER ONE Platonic Mysticism n the introduction, we began with the etymology of the word I“mysticism,” which derives from mystes (μύστης), an initiate into the ancient Mysteries. Literally, it refers to “one who remains silent,” or to “that which is concealed,” referring one’s direct inner experi- ence of transcendence that cannot be fully expressed discursively, only alluded to. Of course, it is not clear what the Mysteries revealed; the Mystery revelations, as Walter Burkert suggested, may have been to a significant degree cosmological and magical.1 But it is clear that there is a related Platonic tradition that, while it begins with Plato’s dialogues, is most clearly expressed in Plotinus and is conveyed in condensed form into Christianity by Dionysius the Areopagite. Here, we will introduce the Platonic nature of mysticism. That we focus on this current of mysticism originating with Plato and Platonism and feeding into Christianity should not be understood as suggesting that there is no mysticism in other tradi- tions. Rather, by focusing on Christian mysticism, we will see much more clearly what is meant by the term “mysticism,” and because we are concentrating on a particular tradition, we will be able to recog- nize whether and to what extent similar currents are to be found in other religious traditions. At the same time, to understand Christian mysticism, we must begin with Platonism, because the Platonic tra- dition provides the metaphysical context for understanding its latest expression in Christian mysticism. Plato himself is, of course, a sophisticated author of fiction who puts nearly all of what he wrote into the form of literary dialogues 9 © 2017 Arthur Versluis 10 / Platonic Mysticism between various characters.
    [Show full text]
  • Leibniz: the Last Great Christian Platonist
    chapter 3 Leibniz: The Last Great Christian Platonist Jack Davidson Many of the Platonic doctrines are … most beautiful.1 ∵ Leibniz (1646–1716) was the last great philosopher in the rich tradition of Christian Platonism that began before Augustine (354–430) and ran through Pseudo-Dionysius (early sixth century), John Scottus Eriugena (c. 800– c. 877), Anselm (1033–1109), Nicholas of Cusa (1401–64) and Marsilio Ficino’s (1433–1499) Florentine Academy. With the advent of figures like John Locke (1632–1704), David Hume (1711–1776), Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712–1778) and Immanuel Kant (1724–1804), philosophy became both mundane and largely secular. This chapter focuses on the most influential of the 17th-century German Platonists, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. As anyone who knows of the history of Platonism from Plato onward realizes, classifying Leibniz as a Platonist is to place him in the company of philosophers who hold (sometimes wildly) different views, so some specifi- cation is necessary. These days, “Platonism” is used by scholars of ancient philosophy to describe what they take to be actual doctrines in the Platonic canon, doctrines Plato developed or continued to hold in the dialogues after the early, Socratic dialogues, e.g., the theory of the Forms.2 In contemporary metaphysics, “Platonism” refers to the view that certain abstract truths, like those of mathematics and logic, exist independently of time and space and human thought. Frege, Gödel, and Russell were all Platonists in this sense, as 1 D ii 222/l 592. Leibniz citations in the text and notes are by abbreviation keyed to the bibli- ography.
    [Show full text]
  • Marsilio Ficino and Avicennian Psychology: on Prophecy and Miracles
    Marsilio Ficino and Avicennian Psychology: on Prophecy and Miracles Naznin Idris Patel School of Religious Studies McGill University, Montreal August 2017 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. © Naznin Idris Patel 2017 Abstract Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology is a philosophical work whose aim is to establish the immortality of the soul. Book XIII contains an account of prophetic visions and miracles that is often compared to Avicenna’s accounts found in his De Anima and Metaphysics. Indeed, Ficino’s relation to Avicenna cannot be overlooked. However, the nature and scope of this relation is not well understood. I argue that a close analysis of both of their psychologies will elucidate the debt Ficino owes to Avicenna as well as Ficino’s motives in doing so. A comparison of their theories reveals that Ficino’s synthetic use of Avicennian ideas allows him to make a compelling case for the immortality of the soul and its divine origins. He uses prophecy and miracles in order to demonstrate the power inherent in the rational soul when it manages to transcend its body. Résumé La Théologie Platonicienne de Marcil Ficin est un texte philosophique dont le but est d’établir l’immortalité de l’âme. Le treizième livre contient une description des visions prophétiques et des miracles qui est souvent comparée aux rapports d’Avicenne d’après son de Anima et La métaphysique. Certes, la relation entre Ficin et Avicenne ne peut être ignorée. Toutefois, la nature et portée de cette relation ne sont pas bien comprises.
    [Show full text]
  • Marsilio Ficino, Philosopher, and Head of the Platonic Academy of Florence
    Ho\oler Thef,, mutilation, and underlining of books '''«'P""<'^y action and may Zl',rTresult m dismissal from the University BUILDING US|E ONLY PEB-|6 1974 /£B . 6 197^ BUlLDlNcj USE ONLY 0CTi9|l979 OCT 131 L161 — O-I096 MARSILIO FICINO, PHILOSOPHER, AND HEAD OF THE PLATONIC ACADEMY OF FLORENCE BY HARRIET WELLS HOBLER A. B. Rockford College, 1882 THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN HISTORY IN THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OP THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS 1917 H^^ UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS THE GRADUATE SCHOOL i -^^ .9. 7 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPER- VISION BY ____ ENTITLED BE ACCEPTED AS FULFILLING THIS PART OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF In Charge of Thesis Head of Department Recommendation concurred in :* Committee on Final Examination* ^Required for doctor's degree but not for master's. 376559 UlUc' . TABLE OF CONTENTS PROLOG: Two portraits of Marsilio Ficino. INTRODUCTION: The study of Greek in the fifteenth century CHAPTER I: Ficino' s early dedication to the study of Plato; his education; devotion to the work; Cosmo de' Medici's gifts to him; his study of Greek; his letters; his friends; intimate friendships; loyal- ty to Medici family; habits; personal appearance; character; his father, who lived with him; foreign friends; offers of honor and homes; death and burial CHAPTER II: The Florentine Academy; banquets, Landino' description of them; course of instruction in Acad emy; description of assembly rooms; importance; spread of movement. CHAPTER III: Ficino' s works; produced under Lorenzo's patronage; Dialogues of Plato; Enneads of Plotinus Teologica Platonica; Orphic Hymns; other writers of Neo-Platonic School; St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of Presocratic Philosophy Its Origin, Development
    © Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. CHAPTER 1 ~ Presocratics: Ancient Antecedents The term “PresOcratIc” Is a modern creatIOn. The earlI- est attestation discovered so far is found in a manual of the univer- sal history of philosophy published in 1788 by J.- A. Eberhard (the addressee of a famous letter by Kant): one section is entitled “Pre- socratic Philosophy” (“vorsokratische Philosophie”).1 But the idea that there is a major caesura between Socrates and what preceded him goes back to Antiquity. In order to understand the modern debates that have developed around the Presocratics, it is indispensable to go back to these ancient Presocratics, whom by convention I pro- pose to designate “pre- Socratics” (in lowercase, and with a hyphen), in order to distinguish them from the “Presocratics,” the historio- graphical category to whose creation they contributed but under which they cannot be entirely subsumed. Even if undeniable simi- larities make the ancient “pre- Socratics” the natural ancestors of our modern Presocratics, the differences between the two groups are in fact not less significant, in particular with regard to the stakes involved in both of them. Antiquity knew of two ways to conceive of the dividing line be- tween what preceded Socrates and what followed him: either Soc- rates abandoned a philosophy of nature for the sake of a philosophy of man (this is the perspective that I shall call Socratic- Ciceronian, which also includes Xenophon), or he passed from a philosophy of things to a philosophy of the concept (this is the Platonic- Aristotelian tradition).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Twenty-Seven Catholic Europe's Road to the Renaissance
    Chapter Twenty-seven Catholic Europe’s Road to the Renaissance In twelfth- and thirteenth-century Christendom the excitement over the new religious movements all but obscured the beginnings of more secular interests, which in the very long run have been far more consequential. Ultimately they undermined both Christianity and Judaism, and led to the replacement of Christendom by Western (a better adjective is “modern”) civilization. In order to appreciate the twelfth-century seeds of this great change we must see it in perspective. The First Crusade permanently widened the horizons of Catholic Christendom, and the widening brought with it a revival of learning. The “pilgrims” who went to the Holy Land saw parts of the world whose inhabitants were much better off than were the pilgrims themselves or the communities from which they had come. In addition, the leaders of the First Crusade set up kingdoms or counties in the Levant. Some of these crusader kingdoms survived for only a few decades, and none of them for more than a few generations. Ephemeral as they were, however, they allowed Christians of northern Europe and Italy to come into continuing contact with the Dar al-Islam. What seemed especially to differentiate easterners from westerners in the early twelfth century was the sophistication of the former: in the Byzantine empire and especially in the Dar al-Islam the pilgrims encountered societies much more complex and advanced than anything they had seen at home. For centuries western Christians had been focused on Heaven and Hell and had been generally satisfied with (or resigned to) the conditions of earthly life that they had inherited from their parents and grandparents.
    [Show full text]
  • Pattison, Kirsty Laura (2020) Ideas of Spiritual Ascent and Theurgy from the Ancients to Ficino and Pico. Mth(R) Thesis
    Pattison, Kirsty Laura (2020) Ideas of spiritual ascent and theurgy from the ancients to Ficino and Pico. MTh(R) thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/81873/ Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Ideas of Spiritual Ascent and Theurgy from the Ancients to Ficino and Pico Kirsty Laura Pattison MA (Hons) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of MTh (by Research). School of Critical Studies College of Arts University of Glasgow Supervisors Prof Charlotte Methuen Dr Mia Spiro October 2020 Declaration of Originality Form – Research Degrees This form must be completed and signed and submitted with your thesis. Name Kirsty Laura Pattison ............................................................................................................. Student Number ........................................................................................................... Title of degree MTh (by Research) .................................................................................................. Title of thesis Ideas of Spiritual Ascent from the Ancients to Ficino and Pico .................................. The University's degrees and other academic awards are given in recognition of a student's personal achievement. All work submitted for assessment is accepted on the understanding that it is the student's own effort.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ship of Virtuous Ladies
    SYMPHORIEN CHAMPIER The Ship of Virtuous Ladies • Edited and translated by TODD W. REESER Iter Press Toronto, Ontario Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies Tempe, Arizona 2018 Iter Press Tel: 416/978–7074 Email: [email protected] Fax: 416/978–1668 Web: www.itergateway.org Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies Tel: 480/965–5900 Email: [email protected] Fax: 480/965–1681 Web: acmrs.org © 2018 Iter, Inc. and the Arizona Board of Regents for Arizona State University. All rights reserved. Printed in Canada. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Champier, Symphorien, 1472?–approximately 1535, author. | Reeser, Todd W., 1967– editor, translator. Title: The ship of virtuous ladies / Symphorien Champier ; edited and translated by Todd W. Reeser. Other titles: Nef des dames vertueuses. English Description: Toronto, Ontario : Iter Press ; Tempe, Arizona : Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 2018. | Series: The other voice in early modern Europe. The Toronto series ; 61 | Series: Medieval and Renaissance texts and studies ; volume 528 | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2017029563 (print) | LCCN 2017039867 (ebook) | ISBN 9780866987417 (ebook) | ISBN 9780866985857 (pbk. : alk. paper) Subjects: LCSH: French literature--16th century. | Women--France--History--To 1500. | Women-- France--History--16th century. | Neoplatonism in literature. Classification: LCC PQ1553.C45 (ebook) | LCC PQ1553.C45 N4313 2018 (print) | DDC 848/.309--dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017029563 Cover illustration: Bibliothèque municipale de Lyon, Rés. Inc. 830, title page. From La nef des dames vertueuses / compo- sée par maistre Simphorien Champier. 1503. Cover design: Maureen Morin, Information Technology Services, University of Toronto Libraries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Presocratics
    1 The Presocratics Preliminaries The writings of the Presocratics are substantial – the standard edition of their works (by Hermann Diels, 1922, revised by Walther Kranz, 1961) contains three large volumes – and so we are immediately faced with the problem of text selection discussed in the Introduction. There is, in addition, another significant problem when it comes to the source material of Presocratic philosophy: it is fragmentary in nature. Further- more, the fragments are of two kinds (at least according to Diels): some (the “A” fragments) are reports about the Presocratics given by other ancient thinkers, while others seem to be original to the thinkers them- selves (“B”). Trying to defend a coherent interpretation of these fragments is a monumental challenge for a philological detective. The “A” fragments pose a unique difficulty. For example, several of the most extensive of them come from Aristotle. But, as one scholar, echoing the complaint made by Kingsley cited in the Introduction, says, “Aristotle focuses narrowly on exactly that aspect of [his predecessors’] theories which is of relevance to his own intellectual concerns” (Inwood The Presocratics 11 RTAC01 11 27/2/04, 3:07 PM 2001, p. 73). In short, Aristotle may not give us an objective or accurate account of the Presocratics. In this chapter, all my citations of the Presocratics will be from Diels and will be indicated by using his notation (for example, A12, B34). Unless mentioned otherwise in the notes, translations are my own. Before beginning, however, a small step backwards must be taken. The first author to be discussed in this book will not be a philosopher at all.
    [Show full text]