Downloaded from Brill.Com10/02/2021 12:14:41PM Via Free Access T  E,  142, 1999

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Downloaded from Brill.Com10/02/2021 12:14:41PM Via Free Access T  E,  142, 1999 WOLFGANG SPEIDEL & WOLFRAM MEY Museum für Naturkunde, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin CATALOGUE OF THE ORIENTAL ACENTROPINAE (LEPIDOPTERA, CRAMBIDAE) Speidel, W. & W. Mey, 1999. Catalogue of the Oriental Acentropinae (Lepidoptera, Cram- bidae). – Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 142: 125-142, figs.1-3. [ISSN 0040-7496]. Published 22 September 1999. The catalogue contains all taxa of Acentropinae (= Nymphulinae) described from the Oriental Region with the references for every taxon. There are many new generic combinations for which the catalogue should be consulted. New synonyms: Neoschoenobia decoloralis Hampson, 1919 is a new junior synonym of Neoschoenobia testacealis Hampson, 1900; Cataclysta dohrni Hering, 1903 and Ephormotris oc- topis Meyrick, 1933 are new junior synonyms of Ephormotris dilucidalis Guérin-Méneville, [1832] 1829-1858 (Botys) comb. n. Oligostigma tripunctalis Snellen, 1876 is a junior primary homonym of Oligostigma tripunctalis Walker, [1866] 1865. This and the replacement name Aulacodes klimai Bryk, 1937 are new junior synonyms of Eoophyla parapomasalis Hampson, 1897 (Aulacodes) comb. n.; Oligostigma auropunctalis var. javanica Strand, 1914 is a new junior synonym of Eoophyla excisalis Snellen, 1901 (Oligostigma) comb. n.; Oligostigma hapilistale Strand, 1919 is a new junior synonym of Strepsinoma croesusalis Walker, 1859 (Cataclysta); Stenicula Snellen, 1901 and Micromania Swinhoe, 1894 (junior homonym of Micromania Christoph, 1893) are provisionally treated as new junior synonyms of Paracymoriza Warren, 1890; Paraponyx [sic] rugosalis Möschler, 1890 is a new junior synonym of Parapoynx fluctuos- alis Zeller, 1852 (Nymphula). Corespondence: W. Speidel, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Museum für Naturkunde, In- validenstr. 43, D-10115 Berlin. Germany. E-mail: [email protected] Key-words. – Pyraloidea; Crambidae; Acetropinae; Nymphulinae; catalogue; Oriental region The Acentropinae belong to the pyraloid family or catalogues. Checklists provide a synopsis of the Crambidae. This is a large family with numerous species occurring in a certain region and give the cur- species. Several monophyletic groups have been estab- rent state of knowledge including the results of mod- lished within the Crambidae (Minet 1981) which are ern taxonomic work. Secondly, a checklist is a neces- traditionally treated as subfamilies. The Acentropinae sary step in consolidating previous knowledge in seem to be most closely related to the Schoenobiinae order to allow research on the taxonomic group in (Yoshiyasu 1985, Passoa 1988). So far 183 described question. It is a prerequisite to all future revisions. species of Acentropinae are known from the Oriental Lists of Lepidoptera including the Acentropinae have Region. More species are recorded from the Neotrop- been available only for more limited geographical ar- ical Region which is apparently the richest biogeo- eas of the Oriental Region, e.g. Taiwan (Heppner & graphical region with 247 named species (Munroe in Inoue 1992), Thailand (Yoshiyasu 1987) and Nepal Heppner 1995). Most species of Acentropinae have (Robinson et al. 1995). aquatic larvae. Only a very few species are known to This is the first modern checklist of all Acentropi- have terrestrial larval instars (e.g. Nymphicula). The nae known to occur in the Oriental Biogeographical monophyly of the subfamily has been established by Region as a whole. larval and pupal characters: The setae S1 to S3 of the The geographical range adopted for the Oriental larval head are in a line (Passoa 1988) and the stigma- Region is shown in the map (fig. 1). In the Southeast, ta of abdominal segments 2 to 4 of the pupa are raised the boundaries are between Sulawesi and the Moluc- and chimney-like (Speidel 1981, Passoa 1988). cas, and between Sumbawa and Flores. In the West, The high biodiversity, especially in the tropics, the region extends along the southern slopes of the consequently necessitates the production of checklists Himalayas and Karakorum as far as Nuristan in Af- 125 Downloaded from Brill.com10/02/2021 12:14:41PM via free access T E, 142, 1999 Fig. 1. Range of the Orien- tal biogeographical region as adopted in the present catalogue. ghanistan. China is almost completely included, ex- priority of Acentropinae was stated (Speidel 1981). cept for the northernmost provinces from Xinjiang to Several authors do not accept the name Acentropinae, Heilongjiang. The inclusion of the major part of Chi- because Nymphulinae has been in general use for the na means that some palearctic species are listed here. aquatic moths. However, we cannot suppress the se- However, the distribution of all acentropine species nior name Acentropinae, as the synonymy is a subjec- in China is very poorly known. It is quite possible tive one based on a phylogenetic hypothesis. The that these palearctic species will turn out to be widely revalidation of Nymphulinae would be possible, if distributed in adjacent parts of the Oriental Region. new evidence is forwarded to show that Acentria rep- resents the most basal clade within the subfamily as currently defined. However, Acentria seems to be a N A highly specialized offshoot of younger clades of the In the past, the subfamily was generally known as subfamily (Speidel 1998). In our opinion, the present Nymphulinae or Hydrocampinae and the Acentro- state of knowledge does not justify a change in the pinae were treated as a separate subfamily with only priority of these family group names which were both one species, Acentria ephemerella [Denis & Schif- in use before their synonymisation. In an application fermüller], 1775. Recently, the subfamilies Acentro- to the ICZN, published while the present paper was in pinae and Nymphulinae were synonymised and the press, the commission was asked to give precedence to 126 Downloaded from Brill.com10/02/2021 12:14:41PM via free access S M: Oriental Acentropinae the family-group name Nymphulinae in the case that C Nymphulinae and Acentropinae are regarded as syn- onyms (Solis 1999). We do not agree with this pro- Acentropinae Stephens, [1836] 1835 posal and regard the application as unnecessary. A Aquaticae Hübner, 1796, Samml. europ. Schmett., Pyr.: 18 more detailed comment to this case is in preparation. Note: This name is not based on an existing genus-group- name Acentropidae Stephens, [1836] 1835, Illustr. Br. Ent. M (Mandibulata) 6: 148 Nymphulites Duponchel, [1845] 1844, Cat. méth. Lépid. All acentropine taxa of the species-group are listed Eur.: 201 in the present catalogue. The abbreviations for the Hydrocampidae Guenée, 1854, Hist. nat. Insectes (Spec. references are those used in the ‘World List of Scien- gén. Lépid.) 8: 254 Acentridae Speyer, 1869, Stettin. ent. Ztg 30: 406 tific Periodicals (Edn 4)’ and in ‘The Generic Names *Acentropodidae Dunning, 1872, Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. of Moths of the World’ (e. g. Fletcher & Nye 1984). 1872: 152 [invalid emendation] In addition, the full title of every quotation can be ? Lathrotelidae Clarke, 1971, Smithson. Contr. Zool. 56: 58 found in our references. The type species is cited for all taxa of the genus-group. The original combination Neoschoenobia Hampson, 1900 and type locality is provided for every taxon of the Neoschoenobia Hampson, 1900, Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. species-group. It is always indicated when the type lo- 1900: 374. Type species: Neoschoenobia testacealis Hamp- cality has been restricted by the selection of a lecto- son, 1900 by monotypy Note: The Australian genus Eranistis Meyrick, 1910 type. The citation of the localities of the paralectotypes seems to be close. may be regarded as redundant. The type localities are cited in the spelling given in the original description. Neoschoenobia testacealis Hampson, 1900 (Neoschoenobia) This catalogue is predominantly a compilation from Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. 1900: 374 published data in the literature which has been stud- Type locality: [RUSSIA] Amurland, Radeffka ied in detail. In addition, important new information decoloralis Hampson, 1919 (Neoschoenobia ) syn. n. Type locality: [CHINA] Pekin, Western Hills has been gathered by the study of type specimens dur- ing visits to different European museums or by loan of material (The Natural History Museum, London, Nymphicula Snellen, [1880] U. K., Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum Natu- Nymphicula Snellen, [1880] [in Veth, 1880-1892], Mid- ralis (formerly Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Histo- den-Sumatra 4 (8): 78. Type species: Nymphicula stipalis rie), Leiden, Netherlands, Muzeul de Istorie Naturala Snellen, [1880] 1892 by monotypy ‘Grigore Antipa’, Bukarest, Romania, Laboratory of Nymphicula patnalis (Felder & Rogenhofer, 1874) (Cata- Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyoto Prefec- clysta) tural University, Japan). The catalogue is also based Reise öst. Fregatte Novara (Zool.) 2 (Abt. 2): pl. 136, fig. 7 on the identified material of several expeditions, espe- Type locality: [INDIA] Calcutta [lectotype]; [INDONESIA] cially on the material in the Museum für Naturkunde Amboina Note: The specimen figured in the original description in Berlin, Germany (including many types). The was treated as the ‘holotype’ by Speidel, 1984, Neue ent. nomenclature used in the present catalogue follows Nachr. 12: 30. This is here accepted as a lectotype-selection. the rules of the International Code of Zoological Nymphicula bombayensis (Swinhoe & Cotes, 1889) [in Nomenclature in the third edition (February 1985). Cotes & Swinhoe, 1889] (Cataclysta) The original genus is always given and the authors Cat.
Recommended publications
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents Plenary Using ecological site information to evaluate the probabilities and effects of Joel Brown Page 6 restoration Andrew Campbell The last four decades of land repair in Australia: what have we learnt? Page 6 Kingsley Dixon Restoring the island continent Page 6 Restoring species rich and functionally complex grassy communities – feasible Paul Gibson-Roy Page 7 or fiction? Pollination services in restoration – comparing intact and degraded Caroline Gross Page 7 communities provides assembly rules for restoring cleared landscapes Where to from here? Challenges for restoration and revegetation in a fast- Richard Hobbs Page 8 changing world Thomas Jones Ecosystem restoration: recent advances in theory and practice Page 8 Tein McDonald National standards for the practice of ecological restoration in Australia Page 9 David Norton Upscaling the restoration effort – a New Zealand perspective Page 9 A changing climate, considerations for future ecological management and Kristen Williams Page 10 restoration Keynote Linda Broadhurst Restoration genetics – how far have we come and we are we going? Page 10 Turquoise is the new green: riparian restoration and revegetation in the Samantha Capon Page 10 Anthropocene Carla Catterall Fauna: passengers and drivers in vegetation restoration Page 11 Veronica Doerr Landscape connectivity: do we have the right science to make a difference? Page 11 Josh Dorrough Grazing management for biodiversity conservation Page 12 Invasive species and their impacts on agri-ecosystems: issues and solutions
    [Show full text]
  • Fung Yuen SSSI & Butterfly Reserve Moth Survey 2009
    Fung Yuen SSSI & Butterfly Reserve Moth Survey 2009 Fauna Conservation Department Kadoorie Farm & Botanic Garden 29 June 2010 Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden Publication Series: No 6 Fung Yuen SSSI & Butterfly Reserve moth survey 2009 Fung Yuen SSSI & Butterfly Reserve Moth Survey 2009 Executive Summary The objective of this survey was to generate a moth species list for the Butterfly Reserve and Site of Special Scientific Interest [SSSI] at Fung Yuen, Tai Po, Hong Kong. The survey came about following a request from Tai Po Environmental Association. Recording, using ultraviolet light sources and live traps in four sub-sites, took place on the evenings of 24 April and 16 October 2009. In total, 825 moths representing 352 species were recorded. Of the species recorded, 3 meet IUCN Red List criteria for threatened species in one of the three main categories “Critically Endangered” (one species), “Endangered” (one species) and “Vulnerable” (one species” and a further 13 species meet “Near Threatened” criteria. Twelve of the species recorded are currently only known from Hong Kong, all are within one of the four IUCN threatened or near threatened categories listed. Seven species are recorded from Hong Kong for the first time. The moth assemblages recorded are typical of human disturbed forest, feng shui woods and orchards, with a relatively low Geometridae component, and includes a small number of species normally associated with agriculture and open habitats that were found in the SSSI site. Comparisons showed that each sub-site had a substantially different assemblage of species, thus the site as a whole should retain the mosaic of micro-habitats in order to maintain the high moth species richness observed.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Ferns Azolla Spp. (Azollaceae) As New Host Plants for the Small China-Mark Moth, Cataclysta Lemnata (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera, Crambidae, Acentropinae)
    ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.soceurlep.eu/ und www.zobodat.at Nota Lepi. 40(1) 2017: 1–13 | DOI 10.3897/nl.40.10062 Water ferns Azolla spp. (Azollaceae) as new host plants for the small China-mark moth, Cataclysta lemnata (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera, Crambidae, Acentropinae) Atousa Farahpour-Haghani1,2, Mahdi Hassanpour1, Faramarz Alinia2, Gadir Nouri-Ganbalani1, Jabraeil Razmjou1, David Agassiz3 1 University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Department of Plant Protection, Ardabil, Iran 2 Rice Research Institute of Iran (RRII), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Rasht, Iran 3 Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, England http://zoobank.org/307196B8-BB55-492B-8ECC-1F518D9EC9E4 Received 1 August 2016; accepted 3 November 2016; published: 20 January 2017 Subject Editor: Bernard Landry. Abstract. Water ferns (Azolla spp., Azollaceae) are reported for the first time as host plants for the larvae of the small China-mark moth Cataclysta lemnata (Linnaeus) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae: Acentropinae) in rice fields and waterways of northern Iran. Cataclysta lemnata is a semi-aquatic species that has been recorded to feed on Lemnaceae and a few other aquatic plants. However, it has not been reported before on Azolla spp. Larvae use water fern as food source and shelter and, at high population density in the laboratory, they completely wiped water fern from the water surface. Feeding was confirmed after rearing more than eight continual generations of C. lemnata on water fern in the laboratory. Adults obtained this way are darker and have darker fuscous markings in both sexes compared with specimens previously reported and the pattern remains unchanged after several generations.
    [Show full text]
  • A Molecular Phylogeny for the Pyraloid Moths (Lepidoptera: Pyraloidea) and Its Implications for Higher-Level Classification
    Systematic Entomology (2012), 37, 635–656 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2012.00641.x A molecular phylogeny for the pyraloid moths (Lepidoptera: Pyraloidea) and its implications for higher-level classification JEROME C. REGIER1,2, CHARLES MITTER1,M.ALMASOLIS3, JAMES E. HAYDEN4, BERNARD LANDRY5, MATTHIAS NUSS6, THOMAS J. SIMONSEN7, SHEN-HORN YEN8, ANDREAS ZWICK9 andMICHAEL P. CUMMINGS10 1Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, U.S.A., 2Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, College Park, MD, U.S.A., 3Systematic Entomology Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD, U.S.A., 4Florida State Collection of Arthropods, Gainesville, FL, U.S.A., 5Museum´ d’Histoire Naturelle, Geneva, Switzerland, 6Senckenberg Naturhistorische Sammlungen Dresden, Museum fur¨ Tierkunde, Konigsbr¨ ucker¨ Landstr., Dresden, Germany, 7Department of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, London, U.K., 8Department of Biological Sciences, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 9Department of Entomology, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany and 10Laboratory of Molecular Evolution, Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, U.S.A. Abstract. Pyraloidea, one of the largest superfamilies of Lepidoptera, comprise more than 15 684 described species worldwide, including important pests, biological control agents and experimental models. Understanding of pyraloid phylogeny, the basis for a predictive classification, is currently provisional. We present the most detailed molecular estimate of relationships to date across the subfamilies of Pyraloidea, and assess its concordance with previous morphology-based hypotheses. We sequenced up to five nuclear genes, totalling 6633 bp, in each of 42 pyraloids spanning both families and 18 of the 21 subfamilies, plus up to 14 additional genes, for a total of 14 826 bp, in 21 of those pyraloids plus all 24 outgroups.
    [Show full text]
  • Micro-Moth Grading Guidelines (Scotland) Abhnumber Code
    Micro-moth Grading Guidelines (Scotland) Scottish Adult Mine Case ABHNumber Code Species Vernacular List Grade Grade Grade Comment 1.001 1 Micropterix tunbergella 1 1.002 2 Micropterix mansuetella Yes 1 1.003 3 Micropterix aureatella Yes 1 1.004 4 Micropterix aruncella Yes 2 1.005 5 Micropterix calthella Yes 2 2.001 6 Dyseriocrania subpurpurella Yes 2 A Confusion with fly mines 2.002 7 Paracrania chrysolepidella 3 A 2.003 8 Eriocrania unimaculella Yes 2 R Easier if larva present 2.004 9 Eriocrania sparrmannella Yes 2 A 2.005 10 Eriocrania salopiella Yes 2 R Easier if larva present 2.006 11 Eriocrania cicatricella Yes 4 R Easier if larva present 2.007 13 Eriocrania semipurpurella Yes 4 R Easier if larva present 2.008 12 Eriocrania sangii Yes 4 R Easier if larva present 4.001 118 Enteucha acetosae 0 A 4.002 116 Stigmella lapponica 0 L 4.003 117 Stigmella confusella 0 L 4.004 90 Stigmella tiliae 0 A 4.005 110 Stigmella betulicola 0 L 4.006 113 Stigmella sakhalinella 0 L 4.007 112 Stigmella luteella 0 L 4.008 114 Stigmella glutinosae 0 L Examination of larva essential 4.009 115 Stigmella alnetella 0 L Examination of larva essential 4.010 111 Stigmella microtheriella Yes 0 L 4.011 109 Stigmella prunetorum 0 L 4.012 102 Stigmella aceris 0 A 4.013 97 Stigmella malella Apple Pigmy 0 L 4.014 98 Stigmella catharticella 0 A 4.015 92 Stigmella anomalella Rose Leaf Miner 0 L 4.016 94 Stigmella spinosissimae 0 R 4.017 93 Stigmella centifoliella 0 R 4.018 80 Stigmella ulmivora 0 L Exit-hole must be shown or larval colour 4.019 95 Stigmella viscerella
    [Show full text]
  • Nota Lepidopterologica
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Nota lepidopterologica Jahr/Year: 2005 Band/Volume: 28 Autor(en)/Author(s): Agassiz David J.L. Artikel/Article: Book Review Barry Goater, Matthias Nuss & Wolfgang Speidel. Pyraloidea I (Crambidae: Acentropinae, Evergestinae, Heliothelinae, Schoenobiinae, Scopariinae). - In: Peter Huemer & Ole Karsholt (eds.), Microlepidoptera of Europe, Volume 4 161-162 ©Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica; download unter http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ und www.zobodat.at Notalepid. 28 (3/4): 159-161 161 The species was described from 24 cT and 29 collected on Tagarsky island (river Yenisey, near Minusinsk). Afterwards, it was only mentioned as a member of Cossidae (Daniel 1955; Schoorl 1990; Yakovlev 2004), and only on the basis of the detailed original description. After a thorough analysis of Koshantschikov's description, Vladimir V. Dubatolov (Novosibirsk, Russia) assumed that the taxon could belong to Brachodidae. The same assumption was admitted by Axel Kallies (Australia). My study of the type material shows that the taxon does in fact belong to Brachodidae and that it is conspecific with Brachodes appendiculata (Esper, 1783), a species known from South and Central Europe, southern Urals, northern Kazakhstan, and southern Siberia (Zagulyaev 1978). Acknowledgements I am grateful to S. Yu. Sinev (St. Petersburg) for his help during my work with the type material of the Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, to V. V. Dubatolov (Novosibirsk) and Axel Kallies (Australia) for their fruitful comments on the analysis of the Stygia gerassimovii description, to J. W. Schoorl jr. (Holland) for his help in my search for rare publications, to Thomas Witt (Germany) for his all-round support of this investigation, and to V.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of the Aphnaeinae: Myrmecophilous African Butterflies
    Systematic Entomology (2015), 40, 169–182 DOI: 10.1111/syen.12098 Phylogeny of the Aphnaeinae: myrmecophilous African butterflies with carnivorous and herbivorous life histories JOHN H. BOYLE1,2, ZOFIA A. KALISZEWSKA1,2, MARIANNE ESPELAND1,2,3, TAMARA R. SUDERMAN1,2, JAKE FLEMING2,4, ALAN HEATH5 andNAOMI E. PIERCE1,2 1Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, U.S.A., 2Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, U.S.A., 3Museum of Natural History and Archaeology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway, 4Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, U.S.A. and 5Iziko South African Museum, Cape Town, South Africa Abstract. The Aphnaeinae (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) are a largely African subfamily of 278 described species that exhibit extraordinary life-history variation. The larvae of these butterflies typically form mutualistic associations with ants, and feed on awide variety of plants, including 23 families in 19 orders. However, at least one species in each of 9 of the 17 genera is aphytophagous, parasitically feeding on the eggs, brood or regurgitations of ants. This diversity in diet and type of symbiotic association makes the phylogenetic relations of the Aphnaeinae of particular interest. A phylogenetic hypothesis for the Aphnaeinae was inferred from 4.4 kb covering the mitochondrial marker COI and five nuclear markers (wg, H3, CAD, GAPDH and EF1) for each of 79 ingroup taxa representing 15 of the 17 currently recognized genera, as well as three outgroup taxa. Maximum Parsimony, Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Inference analyses all support Heath’s systematic revision of the clade based on morphological characters.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Flowering Phenology and Anthophilous Insect Community at a Threatened Natural Lowland Marsh at Nakaikemi in Tsuruga, Japan
    Flowering phenology and anthophilous insect community at a Title threatened natural lowland marsh at Nakaikemi in Tsuruga, Japan Author(s) KATO, Makoto; MIURA, Reiichi Contributions from the Biological Laboratory, Kyoto Citation University (1996), 29(1): 1 Issue Date 1996-03-31 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/156114 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University Contr. biol. Lab. Kyoto Univ., Vol. 29, pp. 1-48, Pl. 1 Issued 31 March 1996 Flowering phenology and anthophilous insect community at a threatened natural lowland marsh at Nakaikemi in Tsuruga, Japan Makoto KATo and Reiichi MiuRA ABSTRACT Nakaikemi marsh, located in Fukui Prefecture, is one of only a few natural lowland marshlands left in westem Japan, and harbors many endangered marsh plants and animals. Flowering phenology and anthophilous insect communities on 64 plant species of 35 families were studied in the marsh in 1994-95. A total of 936 individuals of 215 species in eight orders of Insecta were collected on flowers from mid April to mid October, The anthophilous insect community was characterized by dominance of Diptera (58 9e of individuals) and relative paucity of Hymenoptera (26 9o), Hemiptera (6 9e), Lepidoptera (5 9e), and Coleoptera (5 9o), Syrphidae was the most abundant family and probably the most important pollination agents. Bee community was characterized by dominance of an aboveground nesting bee genus, Hylaeus (Colletidae), the most abundant species of which was a minute, rare little-recorded species. Cluster analysis on fiower-visiting insect spectra grouped 64 plant species into seven clusters, which were respectively characterized by dominance of small or large bees (18 spp.), syrphid fiies (13 spp.), Calyptrate and other flies (11 spp.), wasps and middle-sized bees (8 spp.), Lepidoptera (2 spp.), Coleoptera (1 sp.) and a mixture of these various insects (11 spp.).
    [Show full text]
  • 150 © Амурский Зоологический Журнал. Vii(2), 2015. 150-153
    © Амурский зоологический журнал. VII(2), 2015. 150-153 Accepted: 11.05. 2015 УДК 595.782 © Amurian zoological journal. VII(2), 2015. 150-153 Published: 30.06. 2015 ОБЗОР ШИРОКОКРЫЛЫХ ОГНЕВОК (LEPIDOPTERA: CRAMBIDAE, PYRAUSTINAE) ЮЖНОЙ ЧАСТИ АМУРО-ЗЕЙСКОГО МЕЖДУРЕЧЬЯ А.Н. Стрельцов [Streltzov A.N. The review of pyraustid moths (Lepidoptera: Crambidae, Pyraustinae) of the southern Amur-Zeya interfluve plain] Кафедра биологии, Благовещенский государственный педагогический университет, ул. Ленина, 104, г. Благовещенск, 675000, Россия. E-mail: [email protected] Department of Biology, Blagoveshchensk State Pedagogical University, Lenina str., 104, Blagoveshchensk, 675000, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Ключевые слова: огневки, Pyraloidea, Crambidae, Pyraustinae, фауна, Амуро-Зейское междуречье, Дальний Восток России Key words: Pyraloidea, Crambidae, Pyraustinae, fauna, Amur-Zeya plain, Russian Far East Резюме. Для территории Амуро-Зейского междуречья приводится 76 видов ширококрылых огневок, относящих- ся к 35 родам из 5 триб. Впервые для территории Амурской области приводится 10 видов – Anania (Anania) egentalis (Christoph, 1881), Uresiphita gilvata (Fabricius, 1794), Ostrinia latipennis (Warren, 1892), Patania expictalis (Christoph, 1881), Nosophora maculalis (Leech, 1889), Herpetogramma luctuosalis (Guenée, 1854), Spoladea recurvalis (Fabricius, 1775), Aripana lactiferalis (Walker, 1859), Botyodes diniasalis (Walker, 1859) и Maruca vitrata (Fabricius, 1787). Для структуры фауны характерно наличие двух примерно равновесных ареалогических
    [Show full text]
  • RECORDS of the HAWAII BIOLOGICAL SURVEY for 1994 Part 2: Notes1
    1 RECORDS OF THE HAWAII BIOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR 1994 Part 2: Notes1 This is the second of two parts to the Records of the Hawaii Biological Survey for 1994 and contains the notes on Hawaiian species of plants and animals including new state and island records, range extensions, and other information. Larger, more comprehensive treatments and papers describing new taxa are treated in the first part of this volume [Bishop Museum Occasional Papers 41]. New Hawaiian Plant Records. I BARBARA M. HAWLEY & B. LEILANI PYLE (Herbarium Pacificum, Department of Natural Sciences, Bishop Museum, P.O. Box 19000A, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817, USA) Amaranthaceae Achyranthes mutica A. Gray Significance. Considered extinct and previously known from only 2 collections: sup- posedly from Hawaii Island 1779, D. Nelson s.n.; and from Kauai between 1851 and 1855, J. Remy 208 (Wagner et al., 1990, Manual of the Flowering Plants of Hawai‘i, p. 181). Material examined. HAWAII: South Kohala, Keawewai Gulch, 975 m, gulch with pasture and relict Koaie, 10 Nov 1991, T.K. Pratt s.n.; W of Kilohana fork, 1000 m, on sides of dry gulch ca. 20 plants seen above and below falls, 350 °N aspect, 16 Dec 1992, K.R. Wood & S. Perlman 2177 (BISH). Caryophyllaceae Silene lanceolata A. Gray Significance. New island record for Oahu. Distribution in Wagner et al. (1990: 523, loc. cit.) limited to Kauai, Molokai, Hawaii, and Lanai. Several plants were later noted by Steve Perlman and Ken Wood from Makua, Oahu in 1993. Material examined. OAHU: Waianae Range, Ohikilolo Ridge at ca. 700 m elevation, off ridge crest, growing on a vertical rock face, facing northward and generally shaded most of the day but in an open, exposed face, only 1 plant noted, 25 Sep 1992, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Article in PDF Format
    Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst. 2018, 419, 42 Knowledge & © K. Pabis, Published by EDP Sciences 2018 Management of Aquatic https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2018030 Ecosystems www.kmae-journal.org Journal fully supported by Onema REVIEW PAPER What is a moth doing under water? Ecology of aquatic and semi-aquatic Lepidoptera Krzysztof Pabis* Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology, University of Lodz, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Lodz, Poland Abstract – This paper reviews the current knowledge on the ecology of aquatic and semi-aquatic moths, and discusses possible pre-adaptations of the moths to the aquatic environment. It also highlights major gaps in our understanding of this group of aquatic insects. Aquatic and semi-aquatic moths represent only a tiny fraction of the total lepidopteran diversity. Only about 0.5% of 165,000 known lepidopterans are aquatic; mostly in the preimaginal stages. Truly aquatic species can be found only among the Crambidae, Cosmopterigidae and Erebidae, while semi-aquatic forms associated with amphibious or marsh plants are known in thirteen other families. These lepidopterans have developed various strategies and adaptations that have allowed them to stay under water or in close proximity to water. Problems of respiratory adaptations, locomotor abilities, influence of predators and parasitoids, as well as feeding preferences are discussed. Nevertheless, the poor knowledge on their biology, life cycles, genomics and phylogenetic relationships preclude the generation of fully comprehensive evolutionary scenarios. Keywords: Lepidoptera / Acentropinae / caterpillars / freshwater / herbivory Résumé – Que fait une mite sous l'eau? Écologie des lépidoptères aquatiques et semi-aquatiques. Cet article passe en revue les connaissances actuelles sur l'écologie des mites aquatiques et semi-aquatiques, et discute des pré-adaptations possibles des mites au milieu aquatique.
    [Show full text]
  • Crambidae Biosecurity Occurrence Background Subfamilies Short Description Diagnosis
    Diaphania nitidalis Chilo infuscatellus Crambidae Webworms, Grass Moths, Shoot Borers Biosecurity BIOSECURITY ALERT This Family is of Biosecurity Concern Occurrence This family occurs in Australia. Background The Crambidae is a large, diverse and ubiquitous family of moths that currently comprises 11,500 species globally, with at least half that number again undescribed. The Crambidae and the Pyralidae constitute the superfamily Pyraloidea. Crambid larvae are concealed feeders with a great diversity in feeding habits, shelter building and hosts, such as: leaf rollers, shoot borers, grass borers, leaf webbers, moss feeders, root feeders that shelter in soil tunnels, and solely aquatic life habits. Many species are economically important pests in crops and stored food products. Subfamilies Until recently, the Crambidae was treated as a subfamily under the Pyralidae (snout moths or grass moths). Now they form the superfamily Pyraloidea with the Pyralidae. The Crambidae currently consists of the following 14 subfamilies: Acentropinae Crambinae Cybalomiinae Glaphyriinae Heliothelinae Lathrotelinae Linostinae Midilinae Musotiminae Odontiinae Pyraustinae Schoenobiinae Scopariinae Spilomelinae Short Description Crambid caterpillars are generally cylindrical, with a semiprognathous head and only primary setae (Fig 1). They are often plainly coloured (Fig. 16, Fig. 19), but can be patterned with longitudinal stripes and pinacula that may give them a spotted appearance (Fig. 10, Fig. 11, Fig. 14, Fig. 22). Prolegs may be reduced in borers (Fig. 16). More detailed descriptions are provided below. This factsheet presents, firstly, diagnostic features for the Pyraloidea (Pyralidae and Crambidae) and then the Crambidae. Information and diagnostic features are then provided for crambids listed as priority biosecurity threats for northern Australia.
    [Show full text]