DOCSLIB.ORG

Growth Motor Development Levels of Young Children in Cricket, Volleyball and Athletics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Growth Motor Development Levels of Young Children in Cricket, Volleyball and Athletics International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences Vol. 7, Special Issue - 4th International Conference on Educational Research and Practice 2017 ISSN: 2222-6990 Growth Motor Development Levels of Young Children in Cricket, Volleyball and Athletics Borhannudin Abdullah, Nor Amalina Shafie, Aminuddin Yusof, Shamsulariffin Shamsudin and Siti NurSarah Salehhodin Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia DOI: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i14/3666 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i14/3666 Abstract The purpose of this study was to identify the gross motor development level of primary school students playing three different sports (athletics, volleyball and cricket). A total of 90 subjects (athletics = 30, volleyball=30, cricket =30) participated in the study. Gross motor development tests Ulrich (2000) with a coefficient of 0.88-0.96 (Hardy, 2009) was conducted to assess the level of gross motor development of young athletes from different sports. There was a significant difference [F (2,87) = 108.2, p = 0.00 ] for gross motor development among young athletes for different sports (athletics, crickets, and volleyball). Post hoc analysis on the GMDQ mean scores showed cricket and volleyball players differed from athletics (p<0.01). Age of locomotor (AEL) scores for the three types of sports also shows significant differences [F (2,87)=86.6, p<0.00] for all three sports. For control object scores (AEM), there were significant differences [F (2,87) = 61.2 , p = 0.00 ] between volleyball and cricket (p <0.01) players. There are differences in gross motor development among young children participating in sports such as athletics, volleyball, and cricket. Keywords: Motor Development, GMDQ, Volleyball Players Introduction Gross motor skills involve the use of large muscle groups in performing daily activities by individuals. Some examples of daily movements that involve gross motor skills are climbing, dancing, running, jumping and kicking. The acquisition of movement skills is very important for young children (Gallahue & Donnelly, 2003) because problems in motor development at an early age may result in less involvement in sports activities or games during childhood and adolescence (Hardy , 2009 ). Applicable motor development involves not only an increase regarding age and physical growth but refers to the physiology, motor system and nervous system. Motor development is a process that is continuous and lifelong starting in the womb until death (Gallahue & Ozmun, 1998). As a child grows, they acquired movement skills and increased physical competence. At this age period, development of basic movement skills children are sensitive (Gallahue & Donnelly, 2003). 265 www.hrmars.com International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences Vol. 7, Special Issue - 4th International Conference on Educational Research and Practice 2017 ISSN: 2222-6990 Locomotor skills are the ability to make changes to body movement in activities that involve the whole body such as changing position in galloping, running, or jumping either with one leg or standing long jump and leaping. Object control skills are the ability to manipulate the equipment with the coordination of the body such as hands and feet position either by moving or in a static condition. Examples of object control skills are hitting a stationary ball, bouncing a ball, catching a ball, kicking a ball or throwing a ball. Gross Motor Development Test (TGMD - 2) is a norm-referenced measure of common gross motor skills of children. It has been used by researchers to identify gross motor functioning by combining fun activities with a reliable and valid measure of gross motor development. TGDM-2 measures locomotor skills (run, gallop, hop, leap, horizontal jump, slid) and object control skills (striking a stationary ball, stationary dribble, kick, catch, overhand throw, and underhand roll). Data are collected through video recordings, and scores are awarded based on successful or failed attempts. The literature suggests there are no other measures of gross motor abilities for children aged 3 through 10 years. Physical Education teachers are trained to measure the physical performance of children regarding fitness such as cardiovascular endurance, muscular endurance, flexibility and the ability of the other components of fitness. However, teachers are not trained on how to measure the gross motor development of a child. appropriate instructional program in gross motor skill development. This results in the no assessment of the gross motor functioning of children and teachers are not able to identify children who are significantly behind their peers in gross motor skill development and formulate an appropriate instructional program in gross motor skill development. Consequently, children failed to acquire basic movement skills throughout their childhood and adolescents (Gallahue, 2011; Goodway, Crowe, & Ward; 2003). Since problems in motor development at an early age may result in less involvement in sports activities or games during childhood and adolescence, it is important to study common gross motor skills of children. This study seeks to : 1) Identify the level of gross motor development among young children in the sports of cricket, volleyball and athletics. 2) Determine differences in gross motor development of young children in the sports of cricket, volleyball and athletics. 3) Determine differences in the scores for age equivalent locomotor skills young children in the sports of cricket, volleyball and athletics. 4) Determine differences in the scores for age equivalent object control skills young children in the sports of cricket, volleyball and athletics. Methodology This ex-post facto study involves six tests of locomotor skills and object control skills using the Test of Gross Motor Development (TGMD) by Ulrich (2000). TGMD is a test of skills such as running, walking, gallop, jump on one foot, standing long jump, leaping , and sliding. Object 266 www.hrmars.com International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences Vol. 7, Special Issue - 4th International Conference on Educational Research and Practice 2017 ISSN: 2222-6990 control skills test involves hitting a stationary ball, catching, rolling, throwing, kicking and bouncing a ball. Both locomotor skills and control objects contain scores ranging from 0 to 48. The subject chosen was children who represented their school in cricket, volleyball and athletics in the state of Selangor. The gross motor development test (TGMD) is used to measure the development of respondents with the accountability test level, r=.96 to .97 within high contains validity (Anastasi & Urbina, 1997: Wouter, Kristine, Christiane, & Coroline, 2008). Findings ANOVA for Gross Motor Development Quotient (GMDQ) between groups The three groups of subjects were analysed descriptively. Table 1 shows the scores for GMDQ to evaluate the mean and standard deviation for each group of subjects. The mean value for subjects in the cricket group was 46.0 with a standard deviation of 7.02. While the mean value for volleyball subjects was 73.5 with a standard deviation of 12.92 followed by mean of 85.5 for subjects in the athletics group with a standard deviation of 13.1. Table 1. Descriptive Statistics for GMDQ Overall Score according to the Type of Sports Variable Sport N Mean Standard Deviation GMDQ Cricket 30 46.0 7.02 Volleyball 30 73.5 12.92 Athletic 30 85.5 13.1 Subjects in the athletics group obtainde the highest mean and standard deviation (mean = 85.5 , sd = 13.1). Based on ANOVA analysis, there were significant differences in GMDQ scores for three different groups [F (2,87) = 108.2 , p = 0.00 ] as shown in Table 2 . Table 2. Summary of ANOVA for Comparison between Sports Scores GMDQ Variance df Min (Square) F P Value Between Groups 2 12302.5 108.2 0.01 In Groups 87 113.6 Post Hoc Analysis of Gross Motor Development Quotient (GMDQ) between Groups Post hoc analysis (Tukey HSD) is shown in table 3. There is a significant difference in GMDQ scores between those in the athletics group from those in volleyballl and cricket (p <.01). Subjects in the volleyball and cricket gropus also differed significantly also showed a significant difference (p < 01). Table 3. Difference Scores GMDQ Post Hoc Analysis between Sports 267 www.hrmars.com International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences Vol. 7, Special Issue - 4th International Conference on Educational Research and Practice 2017 ISSN: 2222-6990 Sport Difference Mean P Value Athletic Volleyball 12.00 0.01 Cricket 39.5 0.01 Volleyball Cricket 27.5 0.01 ANOVA for Age Equivalent Locomotor (AEL) and Age Equivalent Object Control (AEM) between Groups Table 4 shows the mean score for AEL for subjects in the athletics group was 7.30 with a standard deviation of 1.71. For the volleyball group, AEL mean score was 5.73 with a standard deviation of 1.31, followed by cricket (mean=3.10, s.dev = 0.16). For AEM, subjects in the athletics group obtained the highest mean scores of 7.77 with a standard deviation of 1.18 followed by volleyball (mean=6.74) and cricket (mean=3:58). Results of ANOVA analysis age equivalent of locomotor for young athletes, there are significant differences in the level of p <0.05 in AEL score for three games [F (2 , 87) = 86.6 , p = 0.00 ] as shown in Table 5 . Table 4. Descriptive Statistics for Scoring Difference Age Equivalent of Locomotor and ObjectControl Overall by Sports Variable Sport N Mean Standard Deviation Athletic 30 7.30 1.71 AEL Volleyball 30 5.73 1.31 Cricket 30 3.10 0.16 AEM Athletic 30 7.77 1.18 Volleyball 30 6.74 1.88 Cricket 30 3.58 0.37 Table 5. Summary of Comparison on ANOVA for AEL Scores between Sports Variance df Min (Square) F P Value Between Groups 2 135.5 86.6 0.00 In Groups 87 1.56 Table 6 are the results of the analysis ANOVA test showed that there were significant differences [F (2 , 87) = 61.2, p = 0.00] to age equivalent of control object for young athletes in sports.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Child Assessment
    CHILD ASSESSMENT “ I have used my observations overview to plan opportunities that Child Assessment evaluates individual encourage physical activity developmental patterns and milestones, for an infant, three 2-year- including the development of gross motor olds, one 4-year-old and and fine motor skills. Observing and documenting two 6-year-olds. Some each child’s development helps to: of the ways that I have • Identify delays or any unusual development done this is to watch for the for early intervention types of activities that are • Understand each child’s capabilities so that lesson plans address the needs of piquing their curiosity at all children each age.” • Sequence skill development throughout a curriculum – Brenda Flannery, • Know how to adapt physical activity Lil Blessings Child Care, programs and environments Crandon • Observe a child’s behavior and understand more about the reasons or context for those behaviors assessing the children in your program The Gross Motor Developmental Milestones Quick Reference Chart (on pages 16 and 17) will help you observe and assess the physical development of individual children in your care. Features include: • A focus on physical development and skills • Skill categories within the physical development domain • Suggestions for sequencing physical skill development • Separate versions created for different age groups • 24 • CHILD ASSESSMENT how to fit assessment physical development of all of your children, you can prepare adaptations for children at into your day different skill levels. Be sure to communicate successes to parents and give them ideas Observing the physical and gross motor quick tips of how to continue their child’s growth and development of the children in your development at home.
    [Show full text]
  • Rationale of the Study
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences 2015; provided by European www.european Online Journal- science.comof Natural and Social Sciences (ES) Vol.4, No.1 Special Issue on New Dimensions in Economics, Accounting and Management ISSN 1805-3602 The Effect of Eight Weeks of Gymnastics Exercises on the Development of Gross Motor Skills of Five to Six Years Old Girls Elham Fallah, Parivash Nourbakhsh*, Jaleh Bagherly College of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran *E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of pre-level gymnastics exercises on the development of gross motor skills of five to six years old girls. Also, it aimed to examine the effects of exercises on sub-tests of balance, running, galloping, hopping, leaping, horizontal jumping, and sliding. A quasi-experimental research design was conducted. The study samples were preschool girls, randomly placed in an experimental group (n = 20) and a control group (n = 20). The instrumentation included gross motor skill tests of Bruininks-Oseretsky (1978) and Ulrich (2000). Hypotheses testing showed that pre-level gymnastics exercises had a significant effect on the development of balance and gross motor skills of locomotors and sub- scales of its as galloping, hopping, leaping. Therefore, it is recommended to increase learning level and gross motor skill development of children, namely, implement regular and organized motor activities in preschool centers. Keywords: Balance, Gross motor skill, Locomotors Introduction Physical movement is one of the most important aspects of human life, and motor skills allow children gain greater control over their living environment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Motor Development on Typical and Atypical Social Cognition and Language: a Systematic Review
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Goldsmiths Research Online MOTOR DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL COGNITION 1 Leonard H.C. & Hill E.L. (2014). The impact of motor development on typical and atypical social cognition and language: A systematic review. Child & Adolescent Mental Health, ?, ?-?. (John Wiley & Sons Ltd) DOI: 10.1111/camh.12055 The impact of motor development on typical and atypical social cognition and language: A systematic review Hayley C. Leonard* & Elisabeth L. Hill Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, UK * Corresponding Author: KEYWORDS: Motor development, social cognition, Autism Spectrum Disorders, Developmental Coordination Disorder, Specific Language Impairment Abstract Background: Motor development allows infants to gain knowledge of the world but its vital role in social development is often ignored. Method: A systematic search for papers investigating the relationship between motor and social skills was conducted, including research in typical development and in Developmental Coordination Disorder, Autism Spectrum Disorders and Specific Language Impairment. Results: The search identified 42 studies, many of which highlighted a significant relationship between motor skills and the development of social cognition, language and social interactions. Conclusions: This complex relationship requires more attention from researchers and practitioners, allowing the development of more tailored intervention techniques for those at risk of motor, social
    [Show full text]
  • Test of Gross Motor Development (TGMD-2) Procedures Manual
    National Youth Fitness Survey (NYFS) Test of Gross Motor Development (TGMD-2) Procedures Manual April 2012 Table of Contents Chapter Page 1 Overview of The Gross Motor Development (TGMD-2) ...................... 1-1 1.1 Background ................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Key Elements ............................................................................. 1-2 2 Equipment, Supplies and Set-up ............................................................ 2-1 2.1 Test Elements ............................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Supplies ...................................................................................... 2-2 3 Examination Protocol............................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Eligibility ................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Examination Conditions............................................................. 3-1 3.3 Administration Procedures......................................................... 3-1 3.4 Examination Procedures ............................................................ 3-2 3.4.1 Scoring Directions ....................................................... 3-10 3.4.2 Report of Findings ....................................................... 3-10 4 Integrated Survey Information System (ISIS) Data Entry ..................... 4-1 4.1 General Screen Information ....................................................... 4-1 4.2 Recording the
    [Show full text]
  • A Narrative Review of Motor Competence in Children and Adolescents: What We Know and What We Need to Find Out
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Review A Narrative Review of Motor Competence in Children and Adolescents: What We Know and What We Need to Find Out Luís Lopes 1,*,† , Rute Santos 1,2,† , Manuel Coelho-e-Silva 3 , Catherine Draper 4 , Jorge Mota 1 , Boris Jidovtseff 5 , Cain Clark 6 , Mirko Schmidt 7 , Philip Morgan 8 , Michael Duncan 6, Wesley O’Brien 9 , Peter Bentsen 10,11 , Eva D’Hondt 12 , Suzanne Houwen 13, Gareth Stratton 14 , Kristine De Martelaer 12 , Claude Scheuer 15 , Christian Herrmann 16 , António García-Hermoso 17,18, Robinson Ramírez-Vélez 19 , António Palmeira 20 , Erin Gerlach 21, Rafaela Rosário 22 , Johann Issartel 23, Irene Esteban-Cornejo 24 , Jonatan Ruiz 25, Sanne Veldman 26 , Zhiguang Zhang 27,28, Dario Colella 29, Susana Póvoas 30,31, Pamela Haibach-Beach 32, João Pereira 3,28 , Bronagh McGrane 33, João Saraiva 34, Viviene Temple 35 , Pedro Silva 1 , Erik Sigmund 36 , Eduarda Sousa-Sá 1,20,28 , Manolis Adamakis 9 , Carla Moreira 1 , Till Utesch 37 , Larissa True 38 , Peggy Cheung 39 , Jaime Carcamo-Oyarzun 40 , Sophia Charitou 41 , Palma Chillón 24 , Claudio Robazza 42 , Ana Silva 43, Danilo Silva 44 , Rodrigo Lima 45 , Isabel Mourão-Carvalhal 46 , Zeinab Khodaverdi 47 , Marcela Zequinão 48, Beatriz Pereira 43, António Prista 49 and César Agostinis-Sobrinho 1,50 1 Research Centre in Physical Activity, Health and Leisure, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal; [email protected] (R.S.); [email protected] (J.M.); [email protected] (P.S.); [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Review on Motor Skill and Physical Activity in Preschool Children in New Zealand
    Advances in Physical Education, 2017, 7, 10-26 http://www.scirp.org/journal/ape ISSN Online: 2164-0408 ISSN Print: 2164-0386 Literature Review on Motor Skill and Physical Activity in Preschool Children in New Zealand Ajmol Ali1*, Deborah Pigou1,2, Linda Clarke3, Claire McLachlan3,4 1School of Sport and Exercise, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand 2Harbour Sport, North Shore, Auckland, New Zealand 3Institute of Education, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand 4Faculty of Education, Te Hononga School of Curriculum and Pedagogy, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand How to cite this paper: Ali, A., Pigou, D., Abstract Clarke, L., & McLachlan, C. (2017). Litera- ture Review on Motor Skill and Physical Children’s physical activity levels have decreased significantly over the past Activity in Preschool Children in New Zea- 20 - 30 years, coinciding with obesity rates reaching epidemic levels. There is land. Advances in Physical Education, 7, 10- little research into typically developing preschool (birth to 5 year-olds) child- 26. https://doi.org/10.4236/ape.2017.71002 ren’s physical activity, with the majority of research focusing on children at risk of motor skill or neurological deficiencies. This review examines current Received: December 22, 2016 research into young children’s development, especially motor development Accepted: February 6, 2017 and physical activity, the effectiveness of intervention programmes for pro- Published: February 9, 2017 moting children’s physical development and the various methods used to as- Copyright © 2017 by authors and sess physical development. A decrease in children’s physical activity levels has Scientific Research Publishing Inc. coincided with an increase in obesity rates.
    [Show full text]
  • Running Head: MOTOR ACTIVITIES 1
    Running head: MOTOR ACTIVITIES 1 Embedding Motor Activities into Inclusive Preschools Hsiu-wen Yang, M.S. University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign Michaelene M. Ostrosky, Ph. D. University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign Paddy C. Favazza, Ed. D. University of Massachusetts Boston Melissa V. Stalega, M. Ed University of Massachusetts Boston Marty E. Block, Ph. D. University of Virginia Yang, H. W., Ostrosky, M. M., Favazza, P. C., Stalega, M. & Block, M. (2018). Embedding motor activities into inclusive preschools. Young Exceptional Children. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1096250618783994. First Published June 29, 2018 Acknowledgments Grant number R324A150074, from the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education made this article possible. The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official views or an endorsement by the funding agency. MOTOR ACTIVITIES Abstract During the preschool years children develop many new skills, including gross motor abilities, which serve as a foundation for school readiness skills in areas such as language, socialization and cognition. Like other domains, motor skill development does not happen without practice opportunities. That is, it requires multiple opportunities whereby children engage in physical activities to become proficient at skills such as marching, climbing, and throwing. The purpose of this article is to describe strategies that teachers can use to encourage and facilitate all children’s participation in motor activities within inclusive preschool settings. Keywords: physical activity, preschool, inclusion, universal design for learning, gross motor development, disabilities MOTOR ACTIVITIES 3 Embedding Motor Activities into Inclusive Preschools As a half-day preschool teacher, Stephanie observes Tiffany, a happy albeit shy child, who often plays alone during outdoor time.
    [Show full text]
  • Preschoolers Build Fundamental Motor Skills Critical to an Active Lifestyle: the All 4 Kids© Intervention Study
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article Preschoolers Build Fundamental Motor Skills Critical to an Active Lifestyle: The All 4 Kids© Intervention Study Anne R. Lindsay 1,*, Angela Starrett 2 , Ali Brian 3 , Teresa A. Byington 1, Jennifer Lucas 4 and Madeleine Sigman-Grant 1 1 Extension, College of Agriculture, Biotechnology & Natural Resources (CABNR), University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89123, USA; [email protected] (T.A.B.); [email protected] (M.S.-G.) 2 Department of Educational Studies, College of Education, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Physical Education, College of Education, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA; [email protected] 4 Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-702-940-5434 Received: 19 February 2020; Accepted: 24 April 2020; Published: 29 April 2020 Abstract: This pragmatic, real world study examined the effects of the All 4 Kids© intervention on preschoolers’ mastery of movement skills and determined whether the instruction had greater impact than natural development. Methods included a quasi-experimental intervention-comparison subsample of 379 children (COMPARISON) and a pretest-posttest design with convenience scale-up sampling of 2817 preschoolers (SCALE-UP). Children receiving education and dance instruction 3 times/week for 8 weeks were assessed using the Preschool Movement Assessment to evaluate skills pre and post intervention. Using repeated measures ANOVA, McNemar and Wilcoxon signed ranks tests, preschooler’s participation in the intervention resulted in greater improvement in 12 movement skills (F = 83.451, df = 1, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.555), balance (p = 0.028), hopping (t = 3.545, df = 112, p − p = 0.001) and crossing the midline (p < 0.001) than natural development (COMPARISON).
    [Show full text]
  • Motor Skill Performance and Physical Activity in Preschool Children Harriet G
    nature publishing group ARTICLES EPIDEMIOLOGY Motor Skill Performance and Physical Activity in Preschool Children Harriet G. Williams1, Karin A. Pfeiffer2, Jennifer R. O’Neill1, Marsha Dowda1, Kerry L. McIver1, William H. Brown3 and Russell R. Pate1 Children with better-developed motor skills may find it easier to be active and engage in more physical activity (PA) than those with less-developed motor skills. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between motor skill performance and PA in preschool children. Participants were 80 three- and 118 four-year-old children. The Children’s Activity and Movement in Preschool Study (CHAMPS) Motor Skill Protocol was used to assess process characteristics of six locomotor and six object control skills; scores were categorized as locomotor, object control, and total. The actigraph accelerometer was used to measure PA; data were expressed as percent of time spent in sedentary, light, moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA), and vigorous PA (VPA). Children in the highest tertile for total score spent significantly more time in MVPA (13.4% vs. 12.8% vs. 11.4%) and VPA (5% vs. 4.6% vs. 3.8%) than children in middle and lowest tertiles. Children in the highest tertile of locomotor scores spent significantly less time in sedentary activity than children in other tertiles and significantly more time in MVPA (13.4% vs. 11.6%) and VPA (4.9% vs. 3.8%) than children in the lowest tertile. There were no differences among tertiles for object control scores. Children with poorer motor skill performance were less active than children with better-developed motor skills.
    [Show full text]
  • Sudden Unexplained Infant Death Investigation Manual, Chapter 2
    24 SUDDEN, UNEXPLAINED INFANT DEATH INVESTIGATION 2 c h a p t e r Kay Tomashek, M.D., M.P.H. Sarah Blanding, M.P.H., R.D. Laura Crandall, M.A., P.T., N.C.S. CHAPTER 2 INFANT GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT SECTION 1: INFANT DEATH INVESTIGATION FOUNDATION SKILLS 25 Infant Growth and Development Birth to One Year of Age Unit 3: Infant Growth Unit 4: Infant Developmental Milestones Unit 5: Infant Feeding, Diet, and Risks Unlike most decedents encountered by death investigators, infants have limited ability to put themselves in harm's way. This chapter covers basic human growth and development, and dietary issues as applicable to infants from birth to one year of age, and information and technologies that can assist the investigator in evaluating the plausibility of witness accounts and observations as they pertain to infant abilities and purported actions prior to death. CHAPTER 2 INFANT GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT 26 SUDDEN, UNEXPLAINED INFANT DEATH INVESTIGATION OVERVIEW One of the most difficult tasks the infant death investigator has to perform is sorting the numerous details each case produces. Often, these details are part of a witness account of infant activity prior to the incident that preceded the death. Investigators must understand normal infant abilities—based on age—and be able to correlate these with those activities reported by witnesses. This chapter details normal, and abnormal infant growth and development. The student will also be introduced to the most common growth charts and developmental screening tests used in the United States. SUPPORT MATERIALS In addition to the SUIDI Reporting Form or jursidictionally approved equivalent, the following support materials are suggested: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Differences in Gross and Fine Motor Abilities in Preschool Aged Children in West Virginia Kelly R
    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Theses, Dissertations and Capstones 2002 Gender Differences in Gross and Fine Motor Abilities in Preschool Aged Children in West Virginia Kelly R. Pennington Follow this and additional works at: http://mds.marshall.edu/etd Part of the Child Psychology Commons, Developmental Psychology Commons, Life Sciences Commons, Psychiatry and Psychology Commons, and the School Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Pennington, Kelly R., "Gender Differences in Gross and Fine Motor Abilities in Preschool Aged Children in West Virginia" (2002). Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. Paper 783. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Gender Differences in Gross and Fine Motor Abilities in Preschool Aged Children in West Virginia A Thesis Submitted in Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Psychology Kelly R. Pennington Marshall University Graduate College February 7, 2002 Abstract Gender Differences in Gross and Fine Motor Abilities in Preschool Aged Children in West Virginia By Kelly Pennington The purpose of this study was to investigate gender differences in gross and fine motor abilities in preschool aged children in West Virginia. Subjects consisted of 21 males and 16 females. Data was collected via the West Virginia Educare Initiative using the Carolina Curriculum for Preschoolers with Special Needs. Results of this study indicate that there are no significant gender differences in either gross motor or fine motor abilities in preschool aged children.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of Fine and Gross Motor Skills in Adolescents with Down Syndromes1
    International Journal of Science Culture and Sport June 2016 : 4(2) ISSN : 2148-1148 Doi : 10.14486/IntJSCS509 Field : Sport Sciences, Physiology Type : Research Article Recieved: 22.03.2016 – Accepted: 26.04.2016 An Evaluation of Fine and Gross Motor Skills in Adolescents with Down Syndromes1 Şehmus ASLAN1, Ummuhan BAŞ ASLAN2 1 Pamukklae University Faculty of Sport Sciences, Denizli, TURKEY 2 Pamukklae University School of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Denizli, TURKEY Email: [email protected] Abstract Down syndrome (DS) is the most common genetic cause of intellectual disability. Motor development of children with DS is delayed. The aim of the present study was to evaluate of fine and gross motor skills of adolescents with DS. The study sample of a total of 34 participants aged between 14 to 20 years comprised 16 adolescents with DS and a normally developing group of 18 adolescents without DS. Fine and gross motor skills of the participants were assessed by Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, second edition short form (BOT-2 SF). The highest score of the test is 88 and higher score shows higher performance. The average age of adolescents with DS and without DS who participated in the study were 17.06±2.79 and 16.56±1.09, respectively. All partcipants were male. It was found a significant differences for all BOT-2 SF subtests and total scores when compared between adolescents with DS and adolescents without DS (p<0.05). Adolescents without DS has higher scores than adolescents with DS. In conclusion, both fine and gross motor skill performance of adolescents with DS is lower than normally developing adolescents.
    [Show full text]