DOCSLIB.ORG

COMMUNITY FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN Town of Greenburgh, New York

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
COMMUNITY FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN Town of Greenburgh, New York October 2020 STANDARD INVENTORY ANALYSIS AND COMMUNITY FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN Town of Greenburgh, New York Prepared for: Prepared by: Town of Greenburgh Davey Resource Group, Inc. Town Hall 295 S. Water Street, Suite 300 117 Hillside Avenue Kent, Ohio 44240 Greenburgh, New York 10607 800-828-8312 Davey Resource Group, Inc.1May 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................................ ii Standard Inventory Analysis and Community Forest Management Plan Executive Summary ......... iii Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Section 1: Structure and Composition of the Public Tree Resource .......................................................... 4 Section 2: Functions and Benefits of the Public Tree Resource ................................................................ 19 Section 3: Recommended Management of the Public Tree Resource ..................................................... 26 Conclusion ....................................................................................................................................................... 41 References ........................................................................................................................................................ 43 TABLES 1. Defect observations recorded during the tree inventory ..................................................................... 8 2. Pests detected during the inventory ...................................................................................................... 10 3. ROW trees noted to be conflicting with overhead utilities ................................................................ 15 4. Summary of benefits provided by inventoried trees ranked by species importance value .......... 22 5. Matrix 1. Likelihood matrix .................................................................................................................... 27 6. Matrix 2. Risk tating matrix .................................................................................................................... 27 7. Trees recommended for further inspection .......................................................................................... 31 8. Summary of estimated costs of the ten-year management plan ...................................................... 39 FIGURES 1. Estimated costs and workload for each year of the ten-year management plan. ............................ iii 2. Number of inventoried sites by type. ..................................................................................................... 4 3. Inventoried tree population distribution of most abundant species. ................................................. 5 4. Inventoried tree population distribution of most abundant genera. .................................................. 6 5. Inventoried tree population distribution of most abundant families. ................................................ 7 6. Public tree resource susceptibility to pests with a regional presence. ................................................ 9 7. Condition of inventoried trees. .............................................................................................................. 12 8. Relative age distribution of the inventoried trees. .............................................................................. 13 9. Condition of inventoried trees by relative age (size class). ................................................................ 14 10. Estimated height of inventoried trees in ten-foot increments. .......................................................... 16 11. Estimated crown width of inventoried trees in ten-foot increments. ............................................... 17 12. Estimated annual value of the functional benefits provided by the inventoried tree resource. .. 20 13. Estimated value of removing air pollution by weight and type. ...................................................... 24 14. Recommended pruning by size class and risk rating. ........................................................................ 29 15. Recommended removals by size class and risk rating. ...................................................................... 30 16. Routine pruning cycle by diameter class. ............................................................................................. 35 17. Young tree training cycle by diameter class. ........................................................................................ 35 APPENDICES A. Data Collection and Site Location Methods B. Invasive Pests and Diseases C. Risk Assessment/Priority and Proactive Maintenance D. Suggested Tree Species Davey Resource Group, Inc. i October 2020 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project supports the Town of Greenburgh’s vision to promote and enhance community well- being through public tree conservation and improved urban forestry management practices. This Standard Inventory Analysis and Community Forest Management Plan offers expertise in preserving and expanding urban canopy so the environmental, economic, and social benefits it provides continue for generations. Greenburgh is thankful for the grant funding it received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) in cooperation with U.S. Forest Service (USFS) through its Urban and Community Forestry (U&CF) Grant Program. The U&CF Grant Program is designed to encourage communities to create and support sustainable urban forestry programs throughout the United States. Greenburgh also recognizes the support of the following individuals and groups: Greenburgh Town Supervisor Paul Feiner Greenburgh Town Councilwoman Gina Jackson Greenburgh Town Councilman Ken Jones Greenburgh Town Councilwoman Diana Juettner Greenburgh Town Councilman Francis Sheehan Town of Greenburgh Conservation Advisory Council Town of Greenburgh Nature Center Greenburgh Department of Public Works Greenburgh Bureau of Engineering Greenburgh Department of Community Development and Conservation Notice of Disclaimer: Inventory data provided by Davey Resource Group, Inc. “DRG” are based on visual recording at the time of inspection. Visual records do not include individual testing or analysis, nor do they include aerial or subterranean inspection. DRG is not responsible for the discovery or identification of hidden or otherwise non- observable hazards. Records may not remain accurate after inspection due to the variable deterioration of inventoried material. DRG provides no warranty with respect to the fitness of the urban forest for any use or purpose whatsoever. Clients may choose to accept or disregard DRG’s recommendations or to seek additional advice. Important: know and understand that visual inspection is confined to the designated subject tree(s) and that the inspections for this project are performed in the interest of facts of the tree(s) without prejudice to or for any other service or any interested party. Davey Resource Group, Inc. ii October 2020 ERecommended Maintenance Types STANDARD INVENTORY ANALYSIS AND COMMUNITY FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Town of Greenburgh Standard Inventory Analysis and Community Forest Management Plan focuses on quantifying the benefits provided by the inventoried tree resource and addressing its maintenance needs. DRG completed a tree inventory for Greenburgh in March 2020 and analyzed the inventory data to understand the structure of the town’s inventoried tree resource. DRG also estimated the economic values of the various environmental benefits provided by this public tree resource by analyzing inventory data with i-Tree Eco and recommended a prioritized management program for future tree care. The functions of Greenburgh’s inventoried tree population provide benefits with an annual estimated total value of $78,816. The town‘s annual tree maintenance budget is around $300,000, making Greenburgh’s return on investment 26% annually. The functions of Greenburgh’s inventoried tree population throughout its trees’ lifetimes are worth an estimated $29,530,838. Supporting and funding proactive maintenance of the public tree resource is a sound long-term investment that will reduce tree management costs over time. High-priority tree removal and pruning is costly and mitigation of these elevated risk trees accounts for the higher costs in the first year of the ten-year management program (Figure 1). Tree maintenance costs decrease after high-priority work has been completed and management transitions from reactive to proactive maintenance. Proactive maintenance also reduces the number of elevated risk trees over time by preventing deteriorating conditions of trees with initially minor defects. Therefore, budgets for later years are projected to stabilize around $273,090 as work becomes routine. Cost Grand Total Activity Grand Total (# of trees managed) $320,000 1,680 $310,000 1,660 $300,000 1,640 $290,000 1,620 $280,000 1,600 $270,000 Tasks Cost Over Time $260,000 1,580 $250,000 1,560 Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Number of Maintenance Figure 1. Estimated costs and workload for each year of the ten-year management plan. Davey Resource Group, Inc. iii October 2020 Recommended Maintenance Types Tree Removal Total = 691 trees Extreme Risk = 0 trees Trees designated for removal
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Insects and Diseases
    INSECTS AND DISEASES Important Problems of Florida’s Forest and Shade Tree Resources INSECTS AND DISEASES Important Problems of Florida’s Forest and Shade Tree Resources by Edward L. Barnard Pathologist, Florida Division of Forestry and Wayne N. Dixon Entomologist, Florida Division of Forestry Illustrations by Wayne N. Dixon Table of Contents FOREWORD ................................................................................................................... 7 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... 9 HOW TO USE THE BOOK ............................................................................................ 10 DAMAGE KEYS ............................................................................................................ 11 Tree Insects – Key 1 Conifer Foliage .......................................................................... 11 Tree Insects – Key 2 Conifer Branch and Stem .......................................................... 1 Tree Insects – Key 3 Hardwood Foliage ...................................................................... 2 Tree Insects – Key 4 Hardwood Branch and Stem....................................................... 3 Tree Insects – Key 5 Roots ........................................................................................... 4 Diseases of Trees – Key 1 Conifer Foliage .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • No Slide Title
    Tachinidae: The “other” parasitoids Diego Inclán University of Padova Outline • Briefly (re-) introduce parasitoids & the parasitoid lifestyle • Quick survey of dipteran parasitoids • Introduce you to tachinid flies • major groups • oviposition strategies • host associations • host range… • Discuss role of tachinids in biological control Parasite vs. parasitoid Parasite Life cycle of a parasitoid Alien (1979) Life cycle of a parasitoid Parasite vs. parasitoid Parasite Parasitoid does not kill the host kill its host Insects life cycles Life cycle of a parasitoid Some facts about parasitoids • Parasitoids are diverse (15-25% of all insect species) • Hosts of parasitoids = virtually all terrestrial insects • Parasitoids are among the dominant natural enemies of phytophagous insects (e.g., crop pests) • Offer model systems for understanding community structure, coevolution & evolutionary diversification Distribution/frequency of parasitoids among insect orders Primary groups of parasitoids Diptera (flies) ca. 20% of parasitoids Hymenoptera (wasps) ca. 70% of parasitoids Described Family Primary hosts Diptera parasitoid sp Sciomyzidae 200? Gastropods: (snails/slugs) Nemestrinidae 300 Orth.: Acrididae Bombyliidae 5000 primarily Hym., Col., Dip. Pipunculidae 1000 Hom.:Auchenorrycha Conopidae 800 Hym:Aculeata Lep., Orth., Hom., Col., Sarcophagidae 1250? Gastropoda + others Lep., Hym., Col., Hem., Tachinidae > 8500 Dip., + many others Pyrgotidae 350 Col:Scarabaeidae Acroceridae 500 Arach.:Aranea Hym., Dip., Col., Lep., Phoridae 400?? Isop.,Diplopoda
    [Show full text]
  • Juzwik, Jennifer
    The Proceedings of the 2nd National Oak Wilt Symposium Edited by: Ronald F. Billings David N. Appel Sponsored by International Society of Arboriculture – Texas Chapter Cooperators Texas Forest Service Texas AgriLife Extension Service The Nature Conservancy of Texas Lady Bird Johnson Wildflower Center USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Protection 2009 EPIDEMIOLOGY AND OCCURRENCE OF OAK WILT IN MIDWESTERN, MIDDLE, AND SOUTH ATLANTIC STATES Jennifer Juzwik USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station 1561 Lindig Avenue St. Paul, MN 55108 Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT In Midwestern, Middle, and South Atlantic states, the oak wilt fungus (Ceratocystis fagacearum) is transmitted from diseased to healthy oaks below ground via root grafts and above ground via insect vectors. Recent studies have identified insect species in the family Nitidulidae that likely account for the majority of above-ground transmission during spring in several Midwestern states based on frequencies of fungus-contaminated beetles dispersing in oak stands and visiting fresh wounds. Other investigations have utilized quantitative and spatial data to predict root-graft spread in red oak stands. Although the disease is widely distributed in the regions, disease severity ranges from low to high among the regions and within states of the Midwestern region. Knowledge of spread frequencies and relationships between disease spread/severity and various physiographic factors is important in the development of tools for effective disease management. Key words: Ceratocystis fagacearum, disease spread, Nitidulidae New oak wilt infection centers (= foci) are the result of above-ground transmission of the pathogen (Ceratocystis fagacearum (Bretz) Hunt) by animal vectors, primarily insects. Outward expansion of foci from the initial infection(s) occur below ground when fungal propagules move through vascular root connections between a diseased and a nearby healthy oak.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health Manual
    FOREST HEALTH THREATS TO SOUTH CAROLINA’S FORESTS 1 Photo by Southern Forest Insect Work CONTENTS Conference (Bugwood.org) 3STEM, BRANCH & TRUNK DISEASES 9 ROOT DISEASES 13 VASCULAR DISEASES Forest Health: Threats to South Carolina’s Forests, published by the South Carolina Forestry Commission, August 2016 This forest health manual highlights some of the insect pests and diseases you are likely to encounter BARK-BORING INSECTS in South Carolina’s forests, as well as some threats 18 that are on the horizon. The South Carolina Forestry Commission plans to expand on the manual, as well as adapt it into a portable manual that can be consulted in the field. The SCFC insect and disease staff hopes you find this manual helpful and welcomes any suggestions to improve it. 23 WOOD-BORING INSECTS SCFC Insect & Disease staff David Jenkins Forest Health Program Coordinator Office: (803) 896-8838 Cell: (803) 667-1002 [email protected] 27 DEFOLIATING INSECTS Tyler Greiner Southern Pine Beetle Program Coordinator Office: (803) 896-8830 Cell: (803) 542-0171 [email protected] PIERCING INSECTS Kevin Douglas 34 Forest Technician Office: (803) 896-8862 Cell: (803) 667-1087 [email protected] SEEDLING & TWIG INSECTS 2 35 Photo by Robert L. Anderson (USDA Forest DISEASES Service, Bugwood.org) OF STEMS, BRANCHES & TRUNKS and N. ditissima) invade the wounds and create cankers. BEECH BARK DISEASE Spores are produced in orange-red fruiting bodies that form clusters on the bark. The fruiting bodies mature in the fall Overview and release their spores in moist weather to be dispersed by This disease was first reported in Europe in 1849.
    [Show full text]
  • Pest Categorisation of Pseudopityophthorus 
    SCIENTIFIC OPINION ADOPTED: 22 November 2018 doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5513 Pest categorisation of Pseudopityophthorus minutissimus and P. pruinosus EFSA Panel on Plant Health (EFSA PLH Panel), Claude Bragard, Katharina Dehnen-Schmutz, Francesco Di Serio, Paolo Gonthier, Marie-Agnes Jacques, Josep Anton Jaques Miret, Annemarie Fejer Justesen, Alan MacLeod, Christer Sven Magnusson, Juan A Navas-Cortes, Stephen Parnell, Roel Potting, Philippe Lucien Reignault, Hans-Hermann Thulke, Wopke Van der Werf, Antonio Vicent Civera, Jonathan Yuen, Lucia Zappala, Jean-Claude Gregoire, Virag Kertesz and Panagiotis Milonas Abstract The Panel on Plant Health performed a pest categorisation of Pseudopityophthorus minutissimus and Pseudopityophthorus pruinosus, two well-defined insect species in the family Curculionidae, subfamily Scolytinae (Insecta: Coleoptera). They can be identified using taxonomic keys. P. minutissimus is present in parts of Canada and the USA, and P. pruinosus is present in parts of the USA, Guatemala, Honduras and Mexico. The main host plants of the two species are Quercus spp., but they also attack several other genera. The two species mostly colonise weakened or dead branches but can also attack the stems. They are mostly secondary pests but they vector the oak wilt fungus, Bretziella fagacearum, which causes heavy damage in American Quercus spp. populations. The fungus is mainly transmitted by the young adults during their maturation feeding on twigs, leaf petioles and young acorn stems. The beetles are polygamous and have two generations per year in most of their range. The main pathways are wood, bark, plants for planting, cut branches, chips and wood waste. These pathways are fully or partly regulated for the genera Quercus, Castanea and Prunus.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Coarse Woody Debris in Southern Forests Proceedings of the Workshop on Coarse Woody Debris in Southern Forests: Effects on Biodiversity
    Biodiversity and Coarse woody Debris in Southern Forests Proceedings of the Workshop on Coarse Woody Debris in Southern Forests: Effects on Biodiversity Athens, GA - October 18-20,1993 Biodiversity and Coarse Woody Debris in Southern Forests Proceedings of the Workhop on Coarse Woody Debris in Southern Forests: Effects on Biodiversity Athens, GA October 18-20,1993 Editors: James W. McMinn, USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Athens, GA, and D.A. Crossley, Jr., University of Georgia, Athens, GA Sponsored by: U.S. Department of Energy, Savannah River Site, and the USDA Forest Service, Savannah River Forest Station, Biodiversity Program, Aiken, SC Conducted by: USDA Forest Service, Southem Research Station, Asheville, NC, and University of Georgia, Institute of Ecology, Athens, GA Preface James W. McMinn and D. A. Crossley, Jr. Conservation of biodiversity is emerging as a major goal in The effects of CWD on biodiversity depend upon the management of forest ecosystems. The implied harvesting variables, distribution, and dynamics. This objective is the conservation of a full complement of native proceedings addresses the current state of knowledge about species and communities within the forest ecosystem. the influences of CWD on the biodiversity of various Effective implementation of conservation measures will groups of biota. Research priorities are identified for future require a broader knowledge of the dimensions of studies that should provide a basis for the conservation of biodiversity, the contributions of various ecosystem biodiversity when interacting with appropriate management components to those dimensions, and the impact of techniques. management practices. We thank John Blake, USDA Forest Service, Savannah In a workshop held in Athens, GA, October 18-20, 1993, River Forest Station, for encouragement and support we focused on an ecosystem component, coarse woody throughout the workshop process.
    [Show full text]
  • Attracted to Avocado, Lychee, and Essential Oil Lures
    Diversity of Ambrosia Beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) Attracted to Avocado, Lychee, and Essential Oil Lures Paul E. Kendra1*, Jorge S. Sanchez1, Wayne S. Montgomery1, Jerome Niogret1, and Katherine E. Okins2 1USDA-ARS, Subtropical Horticulture Research Station, Miami, FL USA 2Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, DPI, CAPS, Gainesville, FL USA Field trapping studies conducted in Alachua and Marion Counties, Florida, for the redbay ambrosia beetle (Xyleborus glabratus) captured numerous non-target ambrosia beetles, providing information on species diversity and relative abundance. Traps (Lindgren funnels and sticky panels) baited with essential oil lures (manuka and phoebe) or freshly-cut bolts of avocado and lychee wood attracted 17 species of Scolytinae, including 5 species of Xyleborus. Xyleborus glabratus comprised 75% of the captures in a mixed pine-oak-swampbay forest with advanced stages of laurel wilt. The table below summarizes the species caught, representing four tribes within the Scolytinae subfamily, and their respective numbers captured over a three-month period (October-December 2009). Photos of most species are presented. Tribe Xyleborini Tribe Dryocoetini Tribe Corthylini Ambrosiodmus lecontei Hopkins 1 Coccotrypes distinctus (Motshulsky) 1 Subtribe Corthylina Ambrosiodmus obliquus (LeConte) 20 Corthylus papulans Eichhoff 1 Premnobius cavipennis Eichhoff 1 Monarthrum mali (Fitch) 1 Theoborus ricini (Eggers) 2 Xyleborus affinis (Eichhoff) 16 Tribe Cryphalini Subtribe Pityophthorina Xyleborus
    [Show full text]
  • Community Forest Management Plan
    Community Forest Management Plan City of Newburgh, New York July 2015 Prepared for: City of Newburgh Conservation Advisory Council City Hall 83 Broadway Newburgh, New York 12550 Prepared by: Davey Resource Group A Division of The Davey Tree Expert Company 1500 North Mantua Street Kent, Ohio 44240 800-828-8312 Acknowledgments The City of Newburgh’s vision to promote and preserve the urban forest and improve the management of public trees was a fundamental inspiration for this project. This vision will ensure canopy continuity, which will reduce stormwater runoff and improve air quality, public health, and aesthetic values. The City of Newburgh also recognizes the support of its Mayor and City Council: Judy Kennedy – Mayor Genie Abrams – Council Member Regina Angelo – Council Member Cedric Brown – Council Member Cindy Holmes – Council Member Gay Lee – Council Member Karen Mejia – Council Member Notice of Disclaimer. Inventory data provided by Davey Resource Group, a division of The Davey Tree Expert Company, are based on visual recording at the time of inspection. Visual records do not include individual testing or analysis and do not include aerial or subterranean inspection. Davey Resource Group is not responsible for the discovery or identification of hidden or otherwise non-observable hazards. Records may not remain accurate after inspection due to the variable deterioration of inventoried material. Davey Resource Group provides no warranty with respect to the fitness of the urban forest for any use or purpose whatsoever. Clients may choose to accept or disregard Davey Resource Group’s recommendations or to seek additional advice. Important: know and understand that visual inspection is confined to the designated subject tree(s), and that the inspections for this project are performed in the interest of facts of the tree(s) without prejudice to or for any other service or interested party.
    [Show full text]
  • June 24, 2019 Detection of Geosmithia Morbida on Numerous
    Plant Health Progress ¿ 2019 ¿ 00:1–7 https://doi.org/10.1094/PHP-02-19-0016-RS Research Detection of Geosmithia morbida on Numerous Insect Species in Q:1 Four Eastern States Melanie Moore,1,† Jennifer Juzwik,1 Fredric Miller,2 Leah Roberts,3 and Matthew D. Ginzel4 1 USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, St. Paul, MN 55108 2 Department of Horticulture, Joliet Junior College, Joliet, IL 60431 3 6209 Wynbrook Way, Raleigh, NC 27612 4 Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907 Accepted for publication 30 May 2019. Abstract Thousand cankers disease is caused by the coalescence of nu- beetles, bark beetles, and other weevils was conducted in four merous Geosmithia morbida cankers on branches and stems of eastern states, and captured beetles were assayed to detect G. Juglans species, leading to branch dieback and eventual tree morbida using both culture and PCR-based methods. A new death. The fungus sporulates in galleries of the walnut twig beetle primer pair (GmF3/GmR13), based on the b-tubulin region, was (Pityophthorus juglandis), allowing for acquisition of pathogen designed for G. morbida DNA detection. The pathogen was de- propagules and its subsequent transmission to other branches or tected on 18 insect species using molecular methods, and live trees following adult emergence. Recently, G. morbida has been cultures were isolated from two species. This is the first report of isolated from Xylosandrus crassiusculus and Xyleborinus saxesenii the pathogen in Illinois and Minnesota. collected in Ohio and Stenomimus pallidus collected in Indiana. These beetles are known to colonize diseased Juglans nigra in Keywords: diagnostics, trees, thousand cankers disease, Juglans, Q:2 these states.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phylogenetics of Tachinidae (Insecta: Diptera) with an Emphasis on Subfamily Structure
    Wright State University CORE Scholar Browse all Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2013 The Phylogenetics of Tachinidae (insecta: Diptera) with an Emphasis on Subfamily Structure Daniel J. Davis Wright State University Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all Part of the Biology Commons Repository Citation Davis, Daniel J., "The Phylogenetics of Tachinidae (insecta: Diptera) with an Emphasis on Subfamily Structure" (2013). Browse all Theses and Dissertations. 650. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all/650 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Browse all Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF TACHINIDAE (INSECTA: DIPTERA) WITH A FOCUS ON SUBFAMILY STRUCTURE A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science By DANIEL J DAVIS B.S., Wright State University, 2010 2012 Wright State University WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL December 13, 2012 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Daniel J Davis ENTITLED The phylogenetic relationships of Tachinidae (Insecta: Diptera) with a focus on subfamily structure BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Science _____________________________ John O. Stireman III, Ph.D. Thesis Director _____________________________ David Goldstein, Ph.D., Chair Department of Biological Sciences College of Science and Mathematics Committee on Final Examination ____________________________ John O. Stireman III, Ph.D. ____________________________ Jeffrey L. Peters, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the 5Th International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods (Eds
    112 7.1 Friend or Foe: The Role of Native, Natural Enemies in the Biological Control of Winter Moth H.J. Broadley1, J.S. Elkinton2 and G.H. Boettner3 1Organismic and Evolutionary Biology Graduate Program, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA, [email protected], 2Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA, [email protected], 3Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA, [email protected] Natural enemies that cross over from related native species to invasive species mediate invasions in complex ways (Strauss et al., 2012; Dearborn et al., 2016; Faillace et al., 2017). They have the potential to slow down invasions and aid in biological control efforts (Kenis et al., 2008; Vindstad et al., 2013; Dearborn et al., 2016). In the northeastern United States, the European winter moth, Operophtera brumata L. (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) is an invasive, forest pest causing widespread defoliation in rural and urban settings (Elkinton et al., 2014). Following successful biological control of winter moth in Nova Scotia and British Columbia using the tachinid fly, Cyzenis albicans (Fallén) (Diptera: Tachinidae) (Embree 1966; Murdoch et al., 1985; Roland and Embree, 1995), similar efforts are underway in the northeastern United States (Elkinton et al., 2015). While biocontrol shows promising results, success likely depends on additional mortality from native natural enemies. In the northeast U.S., the closest relative to winter moth is Bruce spanworm, O. bruceata (Hulst) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). The two are congeners and can hybridize (Gwiazdowski et al., 2013; Havill et al., 2017), thus it is likely that natural enemies from Bruce spanworm as well as other generalists could cross over to cause mortality to the winter moth population.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Economic Value of Arthropod Biological Control
    ©CAB International – for Steven Naranjo 4 Economic Value of Arthropod Biological Control STEVEN E. NARANJO1*, GEORGE B. FRISVOLD2 AND PETER C. ELLSWORTH3 1USDA-ARS, Arid-Land Agricultural Research Center, Maricopa, AZ, USA; 2Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA; 3Department of Entomology, University of Arizona, Maricopa Agricultural Center, Maricopa, AZ, USA Integrated pest management (IPM) is the strategic control are very low, successful programmes have integration of multiple control tactics resulting in the resulted in essentially permanent pest control with amelioration of pest damage that takes into consid- very favourable economic outcomes (Cock et al., eration environmental safety, and the reduction of 2015; Naranjo et al., 2015). risk and favourable economic outcomes for growers A second approach – augmentative biological and society at large. For thousands of years, natural control – involves the initial (inoculation) or enemies of pests have been harnessed for crop pro- repeated (inundation) introduction of native or tection (Simmonds et al., 1976). Maximizing this exotic natural enemies to suppress pest populations. source of natural control is a foundational element Augmentative biological control has been widely in IPM for suppressing the growth of incipient pest and successfully deployed in many parts of the populations (Stern et al., 1959). Biological control world. It is perhaps most well known in protected has been defined as the purposeful use of natural agricultural production, particularly in Europe and enemies, such as predators, parasitoids and patho- in developing regions such as China, India and gens, to regulate another organism’s populations to Latin America (van Lenteren et al., 2017).
    [Show full text]