DOCSLIB.ORG

PFD Ethylene PROCESS FLOW Ethylene DIAGRAM

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PFD Ethylene PROCESS FLOW Ethylene DIAGRAM PROCESS FLOW Ethylene DIAGRAM Liquid / Gas Steam Cracking Page 1 of 6 Ethylene – Liquid / Gas Steam Cracking Valve Valve Description Design Temperature Design Pressure Range Pipe Size Recommended Valve 1 Number Range deg F deg C psig bar g in dn ® C-Series T-Series G-Series 2.0 ISOLATOR iRSVP Series Watson FlexStream 1 Feed 50 – 100 10 – 37 150 – 200 10.3 – 13.8 10 – 14 250 – 350 • • 2 Steam 350 – 400 176 – 204 150 – 200 10.3 – 13.8 8 – 12 200 – 300 • • 3 Recycle Feed 50 – 100 10 – 37 150 – 200 10.3 – 13.8 6 – 10 75 – 250 • • 4 Primary Heat Exchanger 650 – 850 343 – 454 50 3.5 24 – 42 610–1070 • 5 Fuel Oil 300 – 500 149 – 260 50 3.5 10 – 14 250 – 350 • • 6 Primary Fractionator Overhead 200 – 400 93 – 148 50 3.5 24 – 36 610 – 915 • 7 Cooling Distillation Tower Ethylene 100 – 300 37 – 149 50 3.5 10 – 14 250 – 350 Cut • • 8 Cooling Distillation Tower Recycle 100 – 300 37 – 149 50 3.5 10 – 14 250 – 350 • • 9 Cooling Distillation Tower Water 100 – 300 37 – 149 50 3.5 6 – 10 75 – 250 • 10 Cooling Distillation Tower Overhead 100 – 200 37 – 93 50 3.5 24 – 36 610 – 915 • 11 Cracked Gas Compressor 100 – 200 37 – 93 150 – 500 10.3 – 34.5 24 – 36 610 – 915 • 12 Pre-Fractionator 100 – 200 37 – 93 150 – 200 10.3 – 13.8 12 – 18 300 – 460 • • 13 Caustic Wash Column 100 – 200 37 – 93 150 – 200 10.3 – 13.8 12 – 18 300 – 460 • • 14 Pre-Fractionator Overhead 100 – 200 37 – 93 150 – 200 10.3 – 13.8 24 – 36 610 – 915 • 15 Caustic Wash Column Overhead 100 – 200 37 – 93 150 – 200 10.3 – 13.8 12 – 18 300 – 460 • • 16 Drying Column 50 – 100 10 – 37 500 – 600 34.5 – 41.4 18 – 30 460 – 760 • 17 Main Cooler 50 – 100 10 – 37 300 – 500 20.7 – 34.5 18 – 30 460 – 760 • 18 Main Cooler Overhead 0 – 50 –17 – 10 200 – 300 10.3 – 20.7 12 – 18 300 – 460 • • 19 Hydrogen Separator Methane 0 – 50 –17 – 10 100 – 200 6.9 – 13.8 6 – 12 150 – 300 • 20 Hydrogen Separator Hydrogen 0 – 50 –17 – 10 100 – 200 6.9 – 13.8 6 – 12 150 – 300 • 21 De-methanizer –50 – 0 –45 – –17 50 – 100 3.5 – 6.9 12 – 18 300 – 460 • • 22 De-methanizer Overhead –50 – 0 –45 – –17 50 – 100 3.5 – 6.9 12 – 18 300 – 460 • • 23 De-ethanizer 0 – 50 –17 – 10 300 – 400 20.7 – 27.6 14 – 20 355 – 510 • 24 De-ethanizer Overhead 0 – 50 –17 – 10 300 – 400 20.7 – 27.6 14 – 20 355 – 510 • 25 Acetylene Hydrogenator 100 – 200 37 – 93 200 – 300 13.8 – 20.7 12 – 18 300 – 460 • • 26 Hydrogen 0 – 50 –17 – 10 100 – 200 6.9 – 13.8 6 – 12 150 – 300 • 27 Ethylene Separator 100 – 200 37 – 93 200 – 300 13.8 – 20.7 12 – 18 300 – 460 • • 28 Ethylene Overhead 100 – 200 37 – 93 200 – 300 13.8 – 20.7 12 – 18 300 – 460 • • 29 Ethylene Separator Bottoms 100 – 200 37 – 93 200 – 300 13.8 – 20.7 12 – 18 300 – 460 • • 30 De-propanizer 100 – 200 37 – 93 50 – 100 3.5 – 6.9 18 – 30 460 – 760 • 31 De-propanizer Overhead 50 –45 50 – 100 3.5 – 6.9 18 – 30 460 – 760 • 32 Methylacetylene Hydrogenation 50 –45 50 – 100 3.5 – 6.9 18 – 30 460 – 760 • 33 Hydrogen 0 – 50 –17 – 10 100 – 200 6.9 – 13.8 6 – 12 150 – 300 • 34 Propylene Splitter 50 –45 50 – 100 3.5 – 6.9 24 – 36 610 – 915 • 35 Propylene Splitter Overhead 50 –45 50 – 100 3.5 – 6.9 12 – 18 300 – 460 • • 36 De-butanizer 50 –45 50 – 100 3.5 – 6.9 24 – 36 610 – 915 • 1 Recommend ISOLATOR 2.0 or T-Series if size, pressure and temperature conditions are met. www.mogas.com © Copyright MOGAS Industries, Inc. All rights reserved. 07/25/2021 PFD Ethylene PROCESS FLOW Ethylene DIAGRAM Liquid / Gas Steam Cracking Page 2 of 6 Ethylene – Liquid / Gas Steam Cracking Valve Valve Description Design Temperature Design Pressure Range Pipe Size Recommended Valve 1 Number Range deg F deg C psig bar g in dn ® C-Series T-Series G-Series 2.0 ISOLATOR iRSVP Series Watson FlexStream – 37 De-butanizer C4 Overhead Fraction 50 45 50 – 100 3.5 – 6.9 12 – 18 300 – 460 • • 38 De-penthanizer 50 –45 50 – 100 3.5 – 6.9 24 – 36 610 – 915 • – 39 De-penthanizer C5 Overhead 50 45 50 – 100 3.5 – 6.9 12 – 18 300 – 460 Fraction • • 40 Gasoline Splitter 50 –45 50 – 100 3.5 – 6.9 24 – 36 610 – 915 • – 41 Gasoline Splitter C6-C9 Overhead 50 45 50 – 100 3.5 – 6.9 12 – 18 300 – 460 • • Heat Exchanger – Steam 300 – 1500 150 – 815 200 – 900 13.8 – 62.0 1/2 – 2 13 – 50 • General Ball Valves 25 – 900 –4 – 482 25 – 600 1.7 – 41.4 1 – 3 25 – 75 • 1 Recommend ISOLATOR 2.0 or T-Series if size, pressure and temperature conditions are met. www.mogas.com © Copyright MOGAS Industries, Inc. All rights reserved. 07/25/2021 PFD Ethylene PROCESS FLOW Ethylene DIAGRAM Liquid / Gas Steam Cracking Page 3 of 6 Ethylene Process Overview H2 H2 GASES 26 33 CRACKED GAS COMPRESSORS 15 H2 METHANE ETHYLENE PROPYLENE C4 FRACTION C5 FRACTION C6 – C9 FRACTION 20 22 24 29 31 35 37 39 41 6 10 14 16 PYROLYSIS REACTOR FURNACE STEAM FEED COLUMN 18 SEPARATOR 2 H CAUSTIC WASH 1 2 ACETHYLENE HYDROGENATOR HYDROGENATOR 11 METHYLACETYLENE COOLING COLUMN DRYING PRE-FRACTIONATOR DE-BUTANIZER COOLER DE-ETHANIZER DISTILLATION DE-PROPANIZER 19 DE-METHANIZER DE-PENTHANIZER COLUMN 13 GASOLINE SPLITTER HEAT PROPYLENE SPLITTER 25 ETHYLENE SEPARATOR 32 EX- FRACTIONATOR PRIMARY CHANGER METHANE 12 17 5 7 23 27 4 WATER 9 21 30 36 38 40 HEAVY 3 8 28 34 HYDROCARBONS FUEL OIL FROM COOLING TO DE-PROPANIZER DISTILLATION COLUMN FROM PROPYLENE SPLITTER PROPANE TO PYROLYSIS REACTOR FURNACE www.mogas.com © Copyright MOGAS Industries, Inc. All rights reserved. 07/25/2021 PFD Ethylene PROCESS FLOW Ethylene DIAGRAM Liquid / Gas Steam Cracking Page 4 of 6 Ethylene Process Overview H2 H2 GASES 26 33 CRACKED GAS COMPRESSORS 15 H2 METHANE ETHYLENE PROPYLENE C4 FRACTION C5 FRACTION C6 – C9 FRACTION 20 22 24 29 31 35 37 39 41 6 10 14 16 PYROLYSIS REACTOR FURNACE STEAM FEED COLUMN 18 SEPARATOR 2 H CAUSTIC WASH 1 2 ACETHYLENE HYDROGENATOR HYDROGENATOR 11 METHYLACETYLENE COOLING COLUMN DRYING PRE-FRACTIONATOR DE-BUTANIZER COOLER DE-ETHANIZER DISTILLATION DE-PROPANIZER 19 DE-METHANIZER DE-PENTHANIZER COLUMN 13 GASOLINE SPLITTER HEAT PROPYLENE SPLITTER 25 ETHYLENE SEPARATOR 32 EX- FRACTIONATOR PRIMARY CHANGER METHANE 12 17 5 7 23 27 4 WATER 9 21 30 36 38 40 HEAVY 3 8 28 34 HYDROCARBONS FUEL OIL FROM COOLING TO DE-PROPANIZER DISTILLATION COLUMN FROM PROPYLENE SPLITTER PROPANE TO PYROLYSIS REACTOR FURNACE www.mogas.com © Copyright MOGAS Industries, Inc. All rights reserved. 07/25/2021 PFD Ethylene PROCESS FLOW Ethylene DIAGRAM Liquid / Gas Steam Cracking Page 5 of 6 Ethylene Process Overview H2 H2 GASES 26 33 CRACKED GAS COMPRESSORS 15 H2 METHANE ETHYLENE PROPYLENE C4 FRACTION C5 FRACTION C6 – C9 FRACTION 20 22 24 29 31 35 37 39 41 6 10 14 16 PYROLYSIS REACTOR FURNACE STEAM FEED COLUMN 18 SEPARATOR 2 H CAUSTIC WASH 1 2 ACETHYLENE HYDROGENATOR HYDROGENATOR 11 METHYLACETYLENE COOLING COLUMN DRYING PRE-FRACTIONATOR DE-BUTANIZER COOLER DE-ETHANIZER DISTILLATION DE-PROPANIZER 19 DE-METHANIZER DE-PENTHANIZER COLUMN 13 GASOLINE SPLITTER HEAT PROPYLENE SPLITTER 25 ETHYLENE SEPARATOR 32 EX- FRACTIONATOR PRIMARY CHANGER METHANE 12 17 5 7 23 27 4 WATER 9 21 30 36 38 40 HEAVY 3 8 28 34 HYDROCARBONS FUEL OIL FROM COOLING TO DE-PROPANIZER DISTILLATION COLUMN FROM PROPYLENE SPLITTER PROPANE TO PYROLYSIS REACTOR FURNACE www.mogas.com © Copyright MOGAS Industries, Inc. All rights reserved. 07/25/2021 PFD Ethylene PROCESS FLOW Ethylene DIAGRAM Liquid / Gas Steam Cracking Page 6 of 6 Ethylene Process Overview H2 H2 GASES 26 33 CRACKED GAS COMPRESSORS 15 H2 METHANE ETHYLENE PROPYLENE C4 FRACTION C5 FRACTION C6 – C9 FRACTION 20 22 24 29 31 35 37 39 41 6 10 14 16 PYROLYSIS REACTOR FURNACE STEAM FEED COLUMN 18 SEPARATOR 2 H CAUSTIC WASH 1 2 ACETHYLENE HYDROGENATOR HYDROGENATOR 11 METHYLACETYLENE COOLING COLUMN DRYING PRE-FRACTIONATOR DE-BUTANIZER COOLER DE-ETHANIZER DISTILLATION DE-PROPANIZER 19 DE-METHANIZER DE-PENTHANIZER COLUMN 13 GASOLINE SPLITTER HEAT PROPYLENE SPLITTER 25 ETHYLENE SEPARATOR 32 EX- FRACTIONATOR PRIMARY CHANGER METHANE 12 17 5 7 23 27 4 WATER 9 21 30 36 38 40 HEAVY 3 8 28 34 HYDROCARBONS FUEL OIL FROM COOLING TO DE-PROPANIZER DISTILLATION COLUMN FROM PROPYLENE SPLITTER PROPANE TO PYROLYSIS REACTOR FURNACE www.mogas.com © Copyright MOGAS Industries, Inc. All rights reserved. 07/25/2021 PFD Ethylene.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Uncoupling Binding of Substrate CO from Turnover by Vanadium Nitrogenase
    Uncoupling binding of substrate CO from turnover by vanadium nitrogenase Chi Chung Leea, Aaron W. Faya, Tsu-Chien Wengb,c, Courtney M. Krestb, Britt Hedmanb, Keith O. Hodgsonb,d,1, Yilin Hua,1, and Markus W. Ribbea,e,1 aDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3900; bStanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, Menlo Park, CA 94025; cCenter for High Pressure Science & Technology Advanced Research, Shanghai 201203, China; dDepartment of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; and eDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-2025 Contributed by Keith O. Hodgson, October 5, 2015 (sent for review September 21, 2015; reviewed by Russ Hille and Douglas C. Rees) Biocatalysis by nitrogenase, particularly the reduction of N2 and toward certain substrates; most notably, the V-nitrogenase is CO by this enzyme, has tremendous significance in environment- ∼800-fold more active than its Mo counterpart in reducing CO to and energy-related areas. Elucidation of the detailed mechanism hydrocarbons (10, 11). The V-nitrogenase catalytically turns over of nitrogenase has been hampered by the inability to trap sub- CO as a substrate, generating 16.5 nmol reduced carbon/nmol strates or intermediates in a well-defined state. Here, we report protein/min; in contrast, the Mo-nitrogenase forms 0.02 nmol the capture of substrate CO on the resting-state vanadium-nitro- reduced carbon/nmol protein/min, which is far below the catalytic genase in a catalytically competent conformation. The close resem- turnover rate. Such a discrepancy implies a difference between the blance of this active CO-bound conformation to the recently described redox potentials of the protein-bound V and M clusters, which structure of CO-inhibited molybdenum-nitrogenase points to the could originate from a difference between the heterometal com- mechanistic relevance of sulfur displacement to the activation of positions (V vs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Analysis of Trace Contaminants in High Purity Ethylene and Propylene Using GC/MS Agilent Technologies/Wasson ECE Monomer Analyzer Application
    The Analysis of Trace Contaminants in High Purity Ethylene and Propylene Using GC/MS Agilent Technologies/Wasson ECE Monomer Analyzer Application (thermal conductivity detection), the Introduction Authors use of GC/MSD demonstrates com- Fred Feyerherm parable performance with respect to For the polymer industry, the 119 Forest Cove Dr. linearity and repeatability: for exam- purity of ethylene and propylene Kingwood, TX 77339 ple, for mercaptans and sulfides monomer feedstocks is a high (40–100 ppb) in the ethylene assay, priority. Trace contaminants at John Wasson correlation coefficients for calibra- the part-per-billion (ppb) con- Wasson-ECE Instrumentation tion curves range from 0.992 to 1.000 centration levels can affect 101 Rome Court and relative standard deviations yields dramatically by altering Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 range from 1.95% to 9.31% RSD. subsequent polymer properties Compared to GC/FID for the range of and characteristics. Additionally, contaminant analytes studied here, some trace impurities can irre- Abstract the sensitivity is increased 50-fold; versibly poison reactor catalysts. compared to GC/TCD, the sensitivity The competitive marketing A new product (Application 460B-00) is increased 5000-fold. While the strategies of monomer manufac- from Agilent Technologies/Wasson- sensitivity of MS detection is compa- turers include using new analyti- ECE uses a 5973N GC/MSD (gas rable to that of sulfur chemilumines- cal technologies to guarantee chromatograph/mass selective cence detection for sulfur-containing lower and lower trace impurity detector) for the determination of compounds, MS has the same sensi- levels. trace levels of impurities that are tivity for a broader range of com- moderate-to-low carbon-content pound types.
    [Show full text]
  • Process Modeling and Evaluation of Plasma-Assisted Ethylene Production from Methane
    processes Article Process Modeling and Evaluation of Plasma-Assisted Ethylene Production from Methane Evangelos Delikonstantis, Marco Scapinello and Georgios D. Stefanidis * Process Engineering for Sustainable Systems (ProcESS), Department of Chemical Engineering, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200F, 3001 Leuven, Belgium; [email protected] (E.D.); [email protected] (M.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +32-16-32-10-07 Received: 14 January 2019; Accepted: 28 January 2019; Published: 1 February 2019 Abstract: The electrification of the petrochemical industry, imposed by the urgent need for decarbonization and driven by the incessant growth of renewable electricity share, necessitates electricity-driven technologies for efficient conversion of fossil fuels to chemicals. Non-thermal plasma reactor systems that successfully perform in lab scale are investigated for this purpose. However, the feasibility of such electrified processes at industrial scale is still questionable. In this context, two process alternatives for ethylene production via plasma-assisted non-oxidative methane coupling have conceptually been designed based on previous work of our group namely, a direct plasma-assisted methane-to-ethylene process (one-step process) and a hybrid plasma-catalytic methane-to-ethylene process (two-step process). Both processes are simulated in the Aspen Plus V10 process simulator and also consider the technical limitations of a real industrial environment. The economically favorable operating window (range of operating conditions at which the target product purity is met at minimum utility cost) is defined via sensitivity analysis. Preliminary results reveal that the hybrid plasma-catalytic process requires 21% less electricity than the direct one, while the electric power consumed for the plasma-assisted reaction is the major cost driver in both processes, accounting for ~75% of the total electric power demand.
    [Show full text]
  • Wasson-ECE Instrumentation Refinery Gas Analyzers
    Wasson-ECE Instrumentation Wasson-ECE RGA Configuration Options Refinery Gas Analyzers Wasson-ECE Refinery Gas Analyzers (RGA) are an integral part of any HPI lab. These instruments often carry the heaviest sample loads Application Number 383 383(D)-OXY* 383(D)-MET* 383D-DHA* 383D-SCD* 583 783(D)* because of the critical information they provide. RGAs provide RGA and Standard RGA and RGA and RGA and Fast Description RGA and DHA heavy valuable information regarding plant operation, unit optimization, and RGA oxygenates trace CO/CO sulfurs RGA 2 hydrocarbons quality control. Our RGA systems are designed for flexibility while Runtime (min.) <20 <20/22 <20 <20/140 <20/25 <7 <20 maintaining the accurate and repeatable results our clients have RGA Analyses come to expect. Fixed Gases C1-C5 C1-C7, Configurable** H2S Sulfurs Oxygenates As a premier channel partner of Agilent Technologies, Wasson-ECE extends Trace CO/CO 2 the capabilities of the 7890 Gas Chromatograph to meet key requirements C -C 5 12 of refinery gas analysis. The Wasson-ECE RGA incorporates our specially BTEX designed auxiliary oven, which holds up to five additional rotary valves DHA and six columns, extending the analysis capabilities far beyond traditional Optional Analytical Upgrades methods. Ammonia* Analysis of LP Samples *** At Wasson-ECE we strive to produce a product that is innovative and Separation of O2 and Ar state-of-the-art to help our customers overcome their analytical Inert sample lines challenges. The flexibility of our RGA systems can ease bench space Standard Method Compliance (depending upon final configuration) issues by combining analyses into a single instrument while maintaining ASTM D1946 an easy to service system with minimal downtime.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemolithotrophic Nitrate-Dependent Fe(II)-Oxidizing Nature of Actinobacterial Subdivision Lineage TM3
    The ISME Journal (2013) 7, 1582–1594 & 2013 International Society for Microbial Ecology All rights reserved 1751-7362/13 www.nature.com/ismej ORIGINAL ARTICLE Chemolithotrophic nitrate-dependent Fe(II)-oxidizing nature of actinobacterial subdivision lineage TM3 Dheeraj Kanaparthi1, Bianca Pommerenke1, Peter Casper2 and Marc G Dumont1 1Department of Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany and 2Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Department of Limnology of Stratified Lakes, Stechlin, Germany Anaerobic nitrate-dependent Fe(II) oxidation is widespread in various environments and is known to be performed by both heterotrophic and autotrophic microorganisms. Although Fe(II) oxidation is predominantly biological under acidic conditions, to date most of the studies on nitrate-dependent Fe(II) oxidation were from environments of circumneutral pH. The present study was conducted in Lake Grosse Fuchskuhle, a moderately acidic ecosystem receiving humic acids from an adjacent bog, with the objective of identifying, characterizing and enumerating the microorganisms responsible for this process. The incubations of sediment under chemolithotrophic nitrate- dependent Fe(II)-oxidizing conditions have shown the enrichment of TM3 group of uncultured Actinobacteria. A time-course experiment done on these Actinobacteria showed a consumption of Fe(II) and nitrate in accordance with the expected stoichiometry (1:0.2) required for nitrate- dependent Fe(II) oxidation. Quantifications done by most probable number showed the presence of 1 Â 104 autotrophic and 1 Â 107 heterotrophic nitrate-dependent Fe(II) oxidizers per gram fresh weight of sediment. The analysis of microbial community by 16S rRNA gene amplicon pyrosequencing showed that these actinobacterial sequences correspond to B0.6% of bacterial 13 16S rRNA gene sequences.
    [Show full text]
  • Increased Instrument Uptime with Improved Methanizer for Dissolved Gas Analysis
    Increased Instrument Uptime with Improved Methanizer for Dissolved Gas Analysis Application Note Dissolved gas analysis (DGA)/Transformer oil gas analysis (TOGA) Author Andrew Jones Activated Research Company 7561 Corporate Way Eden Prairie, MN 55344 [email protected] Abstract A nickel catalyst methanizer that was previously poisoned by transformer oil gas was replaced by a Polyarc methanizer on an Agilent 7890 gas chromatograph (GC) analyzer equipped for dissolved gas analysis under ASTM D3612-C. The analyzer met or exceeded the performance criteria from the ASTM Figure 1. Power Transformer method in all aspects. The Polyarc’s two-stage oxidation-reduction catalyst system eliminated The introduction and propagation of new transformer unplanned downtime due to methanizer failures. oils have led to increased performance requirements These improvements led to considerable cost and time for methanizers that convert CO and CO2 to CH4 for savings, and increased sample throughput. FID quantification. Specifically, many labs have struggled with frequent methanizer failures due to catalyst poisoning from these oils. Introduction The Polyarc reactor introduced by ARC in October Dissolved gas analysis (DGA) is an important method 2015, is the latest improvement to methanizer designs for the determination of pending or current faults and utilizes advances in nanoengineered catalysts and within a power transformer. Specifically, as a 3D metal printing to improve robustness, resist transformer ages, the oil that insulates and cools poisons, and improve performance and ease of use. components can begin to degrade. The analysis of Here, we demonstrate how the replacement of a nickel several dissolved gases (H2, N2, O2, CO, CO2, C2H2, catalyst methanizer with a Polyarc can improve DGA C2H4, C2H6, C3H8, C3H6, C4H8) can give early indicators analysis and reduce instrument downtime leading to of faults and transformer stability.
    [Show full text]
  • Metal-Organic Framework Membranes with Single-Atomic Centers for Photocatalytic CO2 and O2 Reduction
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22991-7 OPEN Metal-organic framework membranes with single-atomic centers for photocatalytic CO2 and O2 reduction Yu-Chen Hao1, Li-Wei Chen1, Jiani Li1, Yu Guo 2, Xin Su1, Miao Shu3, Qinghua Zhang4, Wen-Yan Gao1, Siwu Li1, ✉ ✉ ✉ Zi-Long Yu1, Lin Gu 4, Xiao Feng 1, An-Xiang Yin 1 , Rui Si3 , Ya-Wen Zhang 2, Bo Wang 1,5 & Chun-Hua Yan2 1234567890():,; The demand for sustainable energy has motivated the development of artificial photo- synthesis. Yet the catalyst and reaction interface designs for directly fixing permanent gases (e.g. CO2,O2,N2) into liquid fuels are still challenged by slow mass transfer and sluggish catalytic kinetics at the gas-liquid-solid boundary. Here, we report that gas-permeable metal- organic framework (MOF) membranes can modify the electronic structures and catalytic properties of metal single-atoms (SAs) to promote the diffusion, activation, and reduction of gas molecules (e.g. CO2, O2) and produce liquid fuels under visible light and mild conditions. With Ir SAs as active centers, the defect-engineered MOF (e.g. activated NH2-UiO-66) particles can reduce CO2 to HCOOH with an apparent quantum efficiency (AQE) of 2.51% at 420 nm on the gas-liquid-solid reaction interface. With promoted gas diffusion at the porous gas-solid interfaces, the gas-permeable SA/MOF membranes can directly convert humid CO2 gas into HCOOH with a near-unity selectivity and a significantly increased AQE of 15.76% at 420 nm. A similar strategy can be applied to the photocatalytic O2-to-H2O2 conversions, suggesting the wide applicability of our catalyst and reaction interface designs.
    [Show full text]
  • Confirm Oil Integrity and Prevent Catastrophic Failure
    CONFIRM OIL INTEGRITY AND PREVENT CATASTROPHIC FAILURE Agilent Transformer Oil Gas Analyzer (TOGA) The performance and longevity of electrical transformers depend upon the stability of the oil used as an insulator and coolant. Normal transformer operation subjects the oil to electrical and mechanical Agilent Transformer Oil Gas Analyzers include stresses, causing aging, oxidation, vaporization, electrolytic action, and decomposition. These can change the oil’s chemical properties and result innovative technology and reflect our stringent in gas formation. quality control process. Systems include: Analyzing these dissolved gases provides crucial diagnostic information Factory about the transformer’s current and future stability – and helps you • System setup and leak testing determine whether a transformer should be decommissioned. • Instrument checkout • Installation of appropriate columns Reliably characterize oil composition and integrity • Factory-run checkout method using application checkout mix immediately after installation Delivery Based on Agilent 7890B GC system, Agilent Transformer Oil Gas Analyzers are factory-configured and chemically tested to help you • Instrument manual for running the method detect individual gas components – and measure their ratios – to predict • CD-ROM with method parameters and checkout data files for and prevent transformer failure. easy out-of-the-box operation • Application related consumables included – no separate ordering required • Easy consumables re-ordering information Installation • Duplicate factory checkout with checkout sample – onsite by factory-trained support engineer • Optional application startup assistance Perform fast, unattended analysis of transformer Ensure operational stability and generate oil gas using these built-in features: reproducible data… day in and day out • A robust method for measuring decomposition products, pA FID Channel including H , O , CO, CO , and C -C .
    [Show full text]
  • The SRI Methanizer GC Accessory
    GC ACCESSORIES Methanizer Stand-Alone Methanizer Accessory The Methanizer accessory enables any GC equipped with a Flame Ionization Detector to detect low levels of CO and CO2. It comes complete with its own temperature control box and universal power supply, which can operate on any of the various voltages around the world (100-240V). Equipped with swagelok type Power supply fittings, the Methanizer can be connected anywhere between the column and the FID detector. Like the FID detector, the Methanizer requires hydrogen for operation. The required flow rate of hydrogen through the Methanizer is 25mLs/minute. This Methanizer can be a combination of carrier and make-up gases. Connect your hydrogen supply to the 1/16” make-up line on the 1/8” bulkhead fitting. The bulkhead fitting Temperature may also be used to mount the Methanizer body on Hydrogen supply line control box your instrument. with bulkhead fitting Hydrogen Column Methanizer FID Detector Carrier Bulkhead fitting The Methanizer is packed with a nickel catalyst powder. During analysis, the Methanizer is heated to 380oC. This temperature is set at the factory, Actual and should not normally require user adjustment. temperature Once you turn the Methanizer ON, let it warm up display for at least two minutes before verifying the temperature setpoint. When the column effluent mixes with the hydrogen carrier or FID supply and Trimpot for passes through the Methanizer, CO and CO are temperature 2 setpoint converted to methane. Since the conversion of adjustment CO and CO2 to methane occurs after the sample compounds have passed through the column, their retention times are unchanged.
    [Show full text]
  • Trace 1310 Auxiliary Oven – Methanizer Assembly – User Guide
    TRACE 1310 Auxiliary Oven: Methanizer Assembly User Guide This note provides instruction for installing, maintaining, and troubleshooting the methanizer assembly for the TRACE 1310 Auxiliary Oven. Note This guide updates the sections related to the Methanizer Assembly described in the Chapter 3 and Chapter 5 of the TRACE 1310 Auxiliary Oven Instruction Manual PN 31705011. Contents • Installing the Methanizer Assembly • Maintaining the Methanizer • Methanizer Analytical Troubleshooting Installing the This section provides instruction for installing the methanizer assembly into the TRACE 1310 Auxiliary Oven. Methanizer See Figure 1. Assembly Figure 1. Methanizer Assembly OUT IN Methanizer To install the methanizer assembly 1. Remove the protective grid from the back panel by unscrewing the four fixing screws. See Figure 2. P/N 31715015 Revision B June 2014 © 2014 Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. All rights reserved. Figure 2. Methanizer (1) Protective Grid Protective Grid Fixing Screws 2. Look for the four slots and for the hole on the back wall of the main oven, and for the four hooks on the back of the methanizer assembly. See Figure 3. Figure 3. Methanizer Installation (2) Slots OUT Tubing Passing Hole Hooks 3. Insert the methanizer assembly into the back of the instrument, paying attention to guide the OUT tubing into the passing hole provided on the back wall of the main oven. 4. Push the assembly until the four hooks enter into the relevant slot, then hook the assembly pushing it downwards. See Figure 4. Figure 4. Secondary Oven Installation (3) 2 5. Connect the ground wire on the bottom of the assembly using the proper fixing screw, then connect the other end of the wire to the common ground point on the chassis of the instrument.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety and Techno-Economic Analysis of Ethylene Technologies
    SAFETY AND TECHNO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ETHYLENE TECHNOLOGIES A Thesis by PREETHA THIRUVENKATASWAMY Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Chair of Committee, Mahmoud El-Halwagi Committee Members, M. Sam Mannan Hisham Nasr-El-Din Head of Department, M. Nazmul Karim May 2015 Major Subject: Safety Engineering Copyright 2015 Preetha Thiruvenkataswamy ABSTRACT Inherent safety is a concept that enables risk reduction through elimination or reduction of hazards at the grass root level of a process development cycle. This proactive approach aids in achieving effective risk management while minimizing fixed and operating cost. Several indices which quantify the measures of inherent safety have been identified and by applying these techniques on conceptual design stage, an estimate of the inherent risk and additional safety cost measures can be developed. This approach facilitates easy decision making in an early stage, for choosing the best process that is superior in process, economic and safety performance. Yet, these quantitative techniques are not being used effectively in process industries. In this thesis, a comparative approach was developed wherein, two different process technologies producing same chemical were compared through techno-economic and safety analysis, to identify the superior process. Recent advancements in shale gas monetization have contributed to the growth and expansion of large number of petrochemical plants, particularly the ethylene industry. For this thesis, the production of ethylene through two process technologies were considered, such that one route is the primary process route while other is a novel process that is still in development stage.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Gas Analyzer Experts Online Gas Analyzer Experts
    Online Gas Analyzer Experts Online Gas Analyzer Experts Emissions & Odours 2019 Measurement of Aldehydes such as Formaldehyde in ambient air using airmoHCHO analyzer Anoulak Elfassi +33 6 60 30 70 68 [email protected] 15 rue d’Artiguelongue, 33240, St Antoine Online Gas Analyzer Experts Online ChromatotecGas Analyzer Experts overview ▪ French manufacturer for online analyzers : ▪ autoGC ▪ Multiplexing system ▪ Calibration system ▪ Gas generators ▪ Parternship to provide all-in-one solution ▪ Amount of certifications per country and on top 3 of providers selected by US EPA on autoGC evaluation for VOCs measurement in ambient air 2 Online Gas Analyzer Experts Online 40Gas Analyzer years Experts of expertise in gas analysis 1975 Medor range launched on the market by RN Electronique with « Gaz De France », (Research Center) 1986 Foundation of the firm CHROMATO-SUD by the current managers in BORDEAUX 1990 Creation of airmotec AG SAS, Switzerland (Instruments dedicated to the analysis of ambient air - technology coming from the Swiss pharmaceutical industry). 1996 airmotec AG, Chromato-Sud and RN Electronique integrated in Chromatotec Group 2001 airmOZONE and VistaCHROM development Chromatotec Inc in Houston 2002 Launching of air toxic range with new PID detection in ambient air and industrial hygiene 2005 New Office in Beijing 2009 ASTM Standard Test Method for Online Measurement of Sulfur Compounds in Natural Gas (MEDOR range) Analyzers for Hazardous areas range launched 2010 Chinese certification for VOCs system 2011 European
    [Show full text]