Botanical Study for the Silimela/Groblersdal Project
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Agri-Hubs Identified by Limpopo
ONE PAGER EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES – AGRI-HUBS as on 6 November 2015 Agri-Hubs Identified by the Province LIMPOPO PROVINCE 27 PRIORITY DISTRICTS PROVINCE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY PROPOSED AGRI-HUB Limpopo Vhembe Nwanedi Mopani Tzaneen Sekhukhune Groblersdal Capricorn Ga-Poopedi Waterberg Modimolle 1 Capricorn District Municipality Proposed Agri-Hub Location :Ga-Poopedi District Context Demographics The district is situated at the core of economic development in The district has 1 1261 463 people and the total number of households the Limpopo Province and includes the capital of the province, the is 342838 with an average household size of 3.7 (Census 2011). City of Polokwane. Total Area: 21 705km². Capricorn District 59.9% of the population is within the 15 to 64 year age group. Municipality falls under the Limpopo province, located on the northern Unemployment rate is at 37.2% with 49.9% of all households that are side of South Africa. It derives its name from the Tropic of Capricorn, female headed. According to Census 2011, half of the population along which it is situated. It is predominantly rural in nature. It of the CDM resides in the Polokwane Municipality, followed by consists of the following five local municipalities: Aganang, Blouberg, Lepelle-Nkumpi, Blouberg and Aganang with 18%, 13% and 10% Lepelle-Nkumpi, Molemole and Polokwane. Limpopo's capital, respectively, while Molemole Local Municipality accounts for 9% Polokwane (previously Pietersburg), lies in the heart of the Capricorn of the population of the district. Although the population of the region. The district has an internal airport, and is linked to Gauteng by district is growing, the rate of growth is declining. -
Limpopo Proposed Main Seat / Sub District Within the Proposed Magisterial District Groblersdal Main Seat of Elias Motsoaledi
!C ^ !.C! !C ^!C ^ ^ !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C ^ !C^ !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C ^ !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C ^ ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !.!C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C ^ ^ !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ ^ !C !C !. !C !C ^!C ^ !C !C !C ^ !C !C ^ ^!C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C !.^ !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !. !C !C !C !C !C !C!. ^ ^ ^ !C !. !C^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C!C !. !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !.!C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C!.^ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C ^ ^ !C !C !C!.^ !C !. !C !C ^ ^ !. !C ^ ^!C ^ !C ^ ^ ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !. !C ^ !C !. !C !C !C ^ !C.^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C !C ^!. !. !. !C !. ^ !C !C !C !C ^ !C ^ !C !C !C !. !C ^ !C !C !C !C !C !C !. ^ !C !C ^ !C ^!C !C !C !C ^ !C !C !C ^!. !C ^ !C GGrroobblleerrssddaall MMaaiinn SSeeaatt!C ooff EElliiaass MMoottssooaalleeddii MMaaggiisstteerriiaall DDiissttrriicctt !C !C !C !C !. -
2016/17-2020/21Mlm Approved Idp/Budget (5Years)
2016/17-2020/21MLM APPROVED IDP/BUDGET (5YEARS) ADOPTED 31ST MAY 2016 ESC/5.1/05/2016 1 TABLE OF CONTENT NO DESCRIPTION PAGE NO 1. 1. Vision and Mission 6 2. 2.Foreword by the Mayor 7 3. 3.Executive Summary 9 4. 4.Situational analysis 66 4.1.Introduction 66 4.2.KPA 1:Spatial rationale 78 4.3.KPA 2:Basic Service Delivery and Infrastructure Development 104 4.4 KPA 3:LED 192 4.5.KPA 4:Financial Viability 206 4.6.KPA 5: Good Governance and Public Participation 214 4.7.KPA 6:Municipal Transformation and Organisational 229 Development 5. 5.Strategies Phase 241 6. 6.Projects Phase 248 7. 7.Integration Phase 298 8 8 .1.Annexure A:Budget Summary 304 8.2.Annexure B:Organisational Structure 306 2 LIST OF ACRONYMS AC : Audit Committee AFS : Annual Financial Statements AG : Auditor General AIDS : Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome ANC : African National Congress BTO : Budget and Treasury Office CBO : Community Based Organisation CDG : Care Dependency Grant CGIS : Corporate Geographic Information System CSG : Child Support Grant CAPEX: Capital Expenditure CWP : Community Works Programme CRDP : Comprehensive Rural Development Programme COGTA: Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs CoGHSTA: Corporate Governance Human Settlement and Traditional Affairs COPE : Congress of the People DCF : District Coordinating Forum DG : Disability Grant DWS : Department of Water and Sanitation DRDLR: Department of Rural Development and Land Reform ECD : Early Childhood Development EDP : Economic Development and Planning EPWP : Expanded Public Works Programme FBW : Free Basic Water FCG : Foster Care Grant HDI : Historically Disadvantaged Individuals 3 ICT : Information and Communication Technology IDP : Integrated Development Plan ITP Integrated Transport Plan IGF : Internally Generated Funds IGR : Inter Governmental Relations IT : Information Technology IWMP : Integrated Waste Management Plan KFA : Key Focus Area KPI : Key Performance Indicator LED : Local Economic Development LEDET : Limpopo Economic Development, Environment and Tourism. -
Threatened Ecosystems in South Africa: Descriptions and Maps
Threatened Ecosystems in South Africa: Descriptions and Maps DRAFT May 2009 South African National Biodiversity Institute Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism Contents List of tables .............................................................................................................................. vii List of figures............................................................................................................................. vii 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 8 2 Criteria for identifying threatened ecosystems............................................................... 10 3 Summary of listed ecosystems ........................................................................................ 12 4 Descriptions and individual maps of threatened ecosystems ...................................... 14 4.1 Explanation of descriptions ........................................................................................................ 14 4.2 Listed threatened ecosystems ................................................................................................... 16 4.2.1 Critically Endangered (CR) ................................................................................................................ 16 1. Atlantis Sand Fynbos (FFd 4) .......................................................................................................................... 16 2. Blesbokspruit Highveld Grassland -
MOUTSE DEMARCATION FORUM and 15 Applicants OTHERS
IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA CASE NO. 40/08 In the matter between: MOUTSE DEMARCATION FORUM AND 15 Applicants OTHERS And PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH Respondents AFRICA AND 17 OTHERS ANSWERING AFFIDAVIT ON BEHALF OF THE SEVENTH, EIGHTH AND NINTH RESPONDENTS I, the undersigned, PHUTI CHRISTOPHER RAMMUTLA do hereby make oath and state that: 2 1. I am the Chief State Law Advisor in the Office of the Premier, Limpopo Province. 2. I have been authorized to oppose this application and to depose to this affidavit on behalf of the seventh, eighth and ninth respondents. 3. The facts that I describe in this affidavit fall within my personal knowledge, unless the context indicates otherwise, and are, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct. 4. As set out in the answering affidavit deposed to on behalf of the second respondent, the applicants rely on two alternative causes of action in this application: 4.1. They challenge the Constitution Twelfth Amendment Act of 2005 (“the Amendment Act”) and the Cross-Boundary Municipalities Laws Repeal and Related Matters Act 23 of 2005 (“the Cross- Boundary Act”) which effects the transfer of Moutse 1 and 3 to Limpopo province on the basis that it is irrational and therefore inconsistent with the Constitution (“the rationality argument”). 4.2. They contend that the province of Mpumalanga failed to follow the prescribed procedure set out in section 118(1)(a) of the Constitution 3 by failing to facilitate public involvement in considering and approving the part of the Amendment Act that related to Moutse 1, 2 and 3 (“the public participation argument”). -
Sorghum and Millet Consumption Practices in the Limpopo Province
Centre de coopération internationale en recherche agronomique pour le développement SORGHUM AND MILLET CONSUMPTION PRACTICES IN THE LIMPOPO PROVINCE A feedback to the stakeholders Fieldwork report Anne BICHARD – [email protected] - Cirad & University of Pretoria Sandrine Dury – [email protected] – Cirad Nicolas Bricas – [email protected] – Cirad Hettie Schönfeldt - [email protected] RESUME In 2002, studies were conducted to understand the consumption patterns of indigenous cereals in the Limpopo Province. Fieldwork was implemented in July 2003 in order to present findings of this consumption study to different stakeholders involved in the sorghum sector in the Limpopo Province. People met were not surprised by the results of the study. Some people, especially from the Limpopo Province Department of Agriculture, are convinced that sorghum (or millet) is more adapted than maize to the environment of the Limpopo Province. They regret that most investments for agronomical research were dedicated to maize, which has become now more attractive for local farmers. Seed breeders are also interested in consumers’ perceptions, which should be taken into consideration more for seeds selection. In fact, criteria of selection focus more on agronomical criteria (drought resistance, yield, ..). Farmers were not surprised by the information disseminated. They agreed with the urban consumers’ perception towards sorghum. Some consider that access to urban markets could be a good opportunity to motivate farmers to produce. However, reaching urban markets seems premature at this stage, as most farmers are only involved in subsistence farming. Their production excess is limited and can moreover be sold locally at a very good price. The harvest in 2003 was extremely bad because of drought. -
English Version (First Draft) Table of Contents
A RD O R IN O , F. (2002). Issues and conflicts about w ater m anagem ent in S outh A frica. T he exam ple of the S teelpoort River Basin. M sc report. IW M I-Cem agref-Cirad-Cnearc. English version (first draft) T able of contents 1 Introduction ______________________________________________________ 6 2 Context and objectives of the study __________________________________ 6 3 Methodology _____________________________________________________ 7 3.1 Data collection about the basin state of knowledge and the management system ___ 8 3.2 Stakeholders points of view collection _____________________________________ 8 3.2.1 Interviews selection ________________________________________________ 8 3.2.2 Interviews development ____________________________________________ 11 3.3 Analysis ___________________________________________________________ 11 4 Results _________________________________________________________ 12 4.1 Hydrosystem characteristics ___________________________________________ 12 4.2 Water usages _______________________________________________________ 13 4.2.1 Usage distribution highly impacted by recent political history ______________ 13 4.2.2 The Lebowa area _________________________________________________ 16 4.2.3 A contrasted landscape and major development stakes ____________________ 18 4.3 How to evaluate and manage water uses impacts on the system ? ______________ 22 4.3.1 A stress related to the high seasonal variability __________________________ 23 4.3.2 Agricultural sector : the main water user _______________________________ -
Sekhukhune District Draft Development Plan
1 SEKHUKHUNE District Municipality SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT DRAFT DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2 KEY ACRONYMS 4IR Fourth Industrial Revolution B2B Back to Basics CoGTA Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs DM District Municipality DWS Department of Water and Sanitation GIS Geographic Information System IDP Integrated Development Plan LM Local Municipality KPA Key Performance Area KPI Key Performance Indicator EM Executive Mayor MM Municipal Manager MTEF Mid-Term Expenditure Framework MuSSA Municipal Strategic Self-Assessment MISA Municipal Infrastructure Support Agent MPAP Municipal Priority Action Plan PAC Performance Audit Committee PSP Professional Service Provider RMCSP Regional Management Contractor Support Programme SCM Supply Chain Management SDBIP Service Delivery and Budget Implementation Plan DWS Department of Water and Sanitation HOD Head of Department PGM Platinum Group Metals GDP Gross Domestic Product GGP Gross Geographic Product SDM Sekhukhune District Municipality MMC Member of Mayoral Committee GVA Gross Value Added HDI Human Development Index 3 HIV Human Immune Virus AIDS Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome NDP National Development Plan SAPS South African Police Services MIG Municipal Infrastructure Grant OECD Organisation for Economic cooperation and Development SEZ Special Economic Zone LEDA Limpopo Economic Development Agency VIP Ventilated Improved Pit 4 Table of Contents Contents KEY ACRONYMS ....................................................................................................................... 2 Table of -
Accredited COVID-19 Vaccination Sites Limpopo
Accredited COVID-19 Vaccination Sites Limpopo Permit Number Primary Name Address 202101850 Dis-Chem Musina Mall Cnr N1 and Smelter Pharmacy Avenue Vhembe DM Limpopo 202101539 Medlin Apteek Shop 26, Bushveld Centre, Cnr Marx & Potgieter Street Waterberg DM Limpopo 202102472 Soutpansberg Family 61 Baobab Street Louis Pharmacy Trichardt Vhembe DM Limpopo 202102793 Clicks Pharmacy Junction Of R524 and Thavhani Mall New Giyani Road Vhembe DM Limpopo 202101395 Van Heerden Pharmacy Shop 16, Bela Mall, Bela Mall R101 Road Waterberg DM Limpopo 202103499 Dis-Chem Thavhani Mall shop L164, Thavhani Pharmacy Mall, Thohoyandou, Limpopo. Vhembe DM Limpopo 202102098 Witpoort Hospital Shongane Road Waterberg DM Limpopo 202102481 Clicks Pharmacy Mall of Capricorn DM the North Limpopo 202100290 Dichoeung Clinic None Dichoeung Sekhukhune DM Limpopo 202101021 Clicks Pharmacy Corner Hans Van Polokwane 2 Rensburg and Grobler Street Capricorn DM Limpopo Updated: 30/06/2021 202101917 Dis-Chem Pharmacy - Cnr R81 & N1 Roads Polokwane North Capricorn DM Limpopo 202102772 Clicks Pharmacy Cnr Smelter Avenue & Musina Mall The Great North Road N1 Vhembe DM Limpopo 202101540 Van Heerden Apteek En Voortrekkerweg 25 Medisyne Depot Waterberg DM Limpopo 202100910 Polokwane CBD Clicks Middestad 1 Cnr Pharmacy Marbet & Rissik Streets Limpopo 202102975 Amandelbult Hospital Hospital street. Amandelbult Complex Waterberg DM Limpopo 202102418 Kalapeng Mankweng Shop no 23 Paledi Mall Pharmacy Mankweng Sovenga 0727 Capricorn DM Limpopo 202100407 Thabazimbi Hospital 1 Hospital Street -
Manche Masemola History and Heritage Project
PART A SEBATAKGOMO-FETAKGOMO HISTORY AND HERITAGE PROJECT & PART B MANCHE MASEMOLA PILGRIMAGE PROJECT Funded by Limpopo Heritage Resources Authority (LIHRA) The association names Sebatakgomo and Fetakgomo were inspired by the significance of cattles in the economic, social and religious life of the Bapedi ba GaSekhukhune (Picture by TM Mojapelo) 1 REPORT ON THE RECORDING AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE SEBATAKGOMO-FETAKGOMO HISTORY AND HERITAGE PROJECT & MANCHE MASEMOLA PILGRIMAGE PROJECT IN SEKHUKHUNELAND 2008 The gravesite of Manche Masemola at GaMarishane, Makhuduthamaga Municipality (Picture by TM Mojapelo) 2 Executive Summary of the Project and its Aims Research on the above project was commissioned by Limpopo Heritage Resource Authority (LIHRA). Bohwa-Boeti Consulting (BBC), as the service provider entered into an agreement with the Authority to gather and package information in a manner that would uncover heritage potential in the identified areas. As reflected in the title, the project is divided into two segments viz. Sebatakgomo-Fetakgomo History and Heritage Project, as well as the Manche Masemola Pilgrimage Project. The first part of this report deals with the Sebatakgomo-Fetakgomo History and Heritage Project. Two municipalities in the Greater Sekhukhune District Municipality have been named in honour of the resistance association launched in the late 1950‟s. Makhuduthamaga Municipality was named by the new government in recognition of the vital role played by the Makhuduthamaga1 in the struggle against the Bantustan policy. Members of the community who supported the policy were labelled as Marantšere2, while supporters of the resistance movement were known as Makhuduthamaga (Central Committee sympathizers). Later the resistance association was renamed Fetakgomo, one of the two mentioned municipalities. -
Resistance to Lutheran Missionary Activities
HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies ISSN: (Online) 2072-8050, (Print) 0259-9422 Page 1 of 11 Original Research Resistance to Lutheran missionary activities through antagonism, traditional beliefs, customs and practices: The case of the Bapedi tribe in Limpopo province, South Africa Author: Before the intervention of the missionaries in Bapedi society, the traditional beliefs, customs and 1 Morakeng E.K. Lebaka practices, such as traditional healing, circumcision, polygamy, indigenous music and rituals, had Affiliation: a vibrant existence. These practices had been prevalent for centuries before the arrival of 1Department of Art and Christianity. After the missionaries of all church denominations were welcomed in Bapedi Music, College of Human society to establish churches and schools as the main vehicles for the dissemination of European Sciences, University of culture, confusion started to build. In this article, I will highlight the reaction of Bapedi people of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa Sekhukhune district, Limpopo province, South Africa, to the missionary activities of Berlin Mission Society (BMS), Germany, from 19 July 1860 to 08 July 2018. The purpose of this study Corresponding author: was to explain the conflict or integration of different cultural norms and the missionary influence Morakeng Lebaka, on the Bapedi indigenous way of life. The questions that I attempt to answer in this article are: [email protected] (1) how do people understand one another when they do not share a common cultural experience? Dates: and (2) who are to blame, the missionaries or the Bapedi people themselves? I address this Received: 13 June 2019 question by analysing the missionary influence on Bapedi traditional beliefs, customs and Accepted: 26 Nov. -
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa: Rationalisation of Magisterial Districts for Limpopo and Mpumalanga
4 No. 39365 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 5 NOVEMBER 2015 GOVERNMENT NOTICES • GOEWERMENTSKENNISGEWINGS Justice and Constitutional Development, Department of/ Justisie en Staatkundige Ontwikkeling, Departement van DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT NO. 1059 05 NOVEMBER 2015 1059 The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996: Invitation to submit comments on the Proposed Rationalisation of Magisterial Districts for the Limpopo and Mpumalanga Provinces 39365 INVITATION TO SUBMIT COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED RATIONALISATION OF MAGISTERIAL DISTRICTS FOR THE LIMPOPO AND MPUMALANGA PROVINCES The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 enjoins the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services to manage the rationalisation of all courts with a view to establishing a court system suited to the requirements of the Constitution (Item 16 (6) to the Constitution). The rationalisation of magisterial districts is part of this exercise. In accordance with this constitutional imperative, the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services, Adv. Michael Masutha, intends to rationalise magisterial districts in the Republic in order to align the territorial jurisdictions of all courts with the Constitution, thereby correcting the legacy of the old districts which are based on the defunct independent, self-governing states and Old RSA territories. The rationalisation process is undertaken gradually and commenced with Gauteng and North West provinces which were implemented with effect from 1 December 2014 followed by the Limpopo and Mpumalanga provinces. Comments are invited on the proposed changes to the magisterial districts indicated in the Schedule below with regard to the Provinces of Limpopo and Mpumalanga. (Proposed changes to the magisterial districts in respect the outstanding Provinces will be published at a later stage).