DOCSLIB.ORG

Israel Faces the Ultra-Orthodox Challenge: Why Now, and What

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Israel Faces the Ultra-Orthodox Challenge: Why Now, and What Israel Faces the Ultra-Orthodox 12 Challenge: Why Now, and What Next? !e integration of the ultra-Orthodox (Haredi) sector t Why has the ultra-Orthodox issue moved to into the general Israeli society has been at the center the top of the political and social agenda at of the political agenda for over a year now, and is this particular time? expected to grip Israel in the coming months and years t What are the main components of proposed with a relatively high level of intensity. It is a complex changes in the ultra-Orthodox sector’s issue with many important and interconnected sub- relationship with the larger Israeli society? issues, so finding a single quick ‘solution’ that would satisfy all concerned parties is highly unlikely. In t What are the chances of implementing change, principle, the dynamics of Israeli Haredim vis-à-vis and what could facilitate or obstruct steps the wider society involve three key problems: their toward implementation? economic integration as a productive sector that contributes to Israel’s economy; equality in burden Background: '!e Year sharing – meaning, primarily, drafting Haredi youth of the Haredim' for IDF or national service; and reformulating the cultural-religious status quo to diminish the Haredi Israel’s ‘Year of the Haredim’ began with a legal crisis, influence on institutions that impact the lives of other continued with a coalition crisis, and concluded Israeli citizens.1 !e rapid demographic growth of the (for the time being) in a political reshu"ing that ultra-Orthodox (forecasts estimate that by 2020, 50% holds both challenges and opportunities for of the Jewish first-graders will be ultra-Orthodox) addressing tensions between the ultra-Orthodox reinforces the need for a timely response to these minority and the non-Orthodox majority in Israel. dilemmas. In the absence of appropriate solutions, !e legal crisis erupted in February 2012, when the they may prove intractable in the future. Supreme Court2 decided to revoke the extension !is paper is an elaboration of some fundamental of the Tal Law, which is the legal basis for Torato issues and how they have developed in the last year: Omanuto [lit. Torah Study is his main occupation] THE JEWISH PEOPLE POLICY INSTITUTE 189 arrangement, which exempted (couched as the Knesset’s largest party, joined under the ‘deferment of service’) over 60,000 Haredi Yeshiva leadership of Shaul Mofaz. !is surprise move, students from compulsory military duty. !e which granted the prime minister a majority of court’s action was the result of an appeal contesting 94 of 120 MKs, was justified by the two leaders the constitutionality of the arrangement allowing in a press conference as heralding a new agenda Yeshiva students to avoid military duty, arguing with four key action items: first among them, as that such an arrangement “violates the right defined by Netanyahu, was “to pass a fair and equal to equality as part of the basic right of human division of the burden to replace the Tal Law”; in dignity.” !e Tal Law’s annulment (August 2012) other words, to formulate a new law to replace the e#ectively toppled the legal structure enabling existing one exempting ultra-Orthodox students the exemption, and at least on its face, obliged from military duty. Following the coalition’s the Israeli government expansion, a commission ‘for equality in the and the IDF to prepare burden,’ headed by Kadima MK Yohanan Plesner, for the induction of many was set up and tasked with formulating the !e Plesner thousands of Yeshiva replacement bill. !e committee’s term, however, Committee students (in 2011 alone, was brief, ending abruptly in a political crisis after also considered 7,700 individuals, for the prime minister canceled it for undisclosed conscription the first time, formally reasons. Its conclusions, published only after it of Israel’s declared Torah study their was clear that Netanyahu had no intention of Arab citizens main occupation and endorsing them, asserted a key principle, ‘military had their military duty service for all,’ and included a 2016 target draft deferred). !e urgent rate of 80% of each recruitment-age cohort in the need to find an alternative Haredi sector. Heavy penalties were also stipulated to the Tal Law – which, on for draft evaders and the learning institutions one hand, would exempt harboring them. !e Plesner Committee also the state from a legal obligation it does not want considered conscription of Israel’s Arab citizens, and probably cannot meet without expending declaring that the principle of universal service considerable resources, and on the other hand, should also apply to them. Nevertheless, the would curb the upward trend in the number of Plesner Committee avoided setting specific target annual exemptions – triggered various political numbers for Arab service, suggesting that they maneuvers culminating in the coalition agreement be defined by a future committee set up for that with the Kadima Party (‘the Coalition of 94’ purpose. As mentioned, the prime minister had [Knesset members]) in the summer of 2012. reservations about the committee’s conclusions, In early May 2012, Prime Minister Netanyahu’s finding its proposals exaggerated and “aggressive,” governing coalition was expanded when Kadima, and called for a more consensual and gradual 190 THE JEWISH PEOPLE POLICY INSTITUTE solution to the ‘equal burden sharing’ problem. Why Now? In any case, the dismantling of the Plesner Committee rang in the demise of the short-lived !ere is no single answer to the question why ‘grand coalition,’ and soon after, Netanyahu called Israeli society has reached its moment of crisis in for early elections. regard to the Haredim at this particular point in time. A confluence of several di#erent factors and !e legislative and political crises resulting from circumstances pushed the Haredi question to the the failure to find a Tal Law replacement were top of the agenda, while clearing the agenda of integral to the 2013 elections and the formation other competing issues. of a new coalition government. Haredi parties were not invited into this coalition, the result of !e Decline of the Peace Process an ultimatum by the two key leaders: Yair Lapid of the liberal centrist party Yesh Atid (!ere is a !e set of factors behind Future), and Naftali Bennett of the religious-Zionist the ascent of the Haredi Lapid: party Habait Hayehudi (!e Jewish Home). In the issue to the top of the I don’t believe negotiations leading to the coalition agreement, agenda certainly includes Shas and both leaders insisted that they would not join the marginalization of Yahadut the coalition unless the Haredi parties (Shas and political/diplomatic HaTorah can sit Yahadut HaTorah) were excluded. Lapid explained: issues, especially the Israeli- in a government “I don’t believe Shas and Yahadut Hatorah can sit Palestinian peace process. that will pursue in a government that will pursue the change for !is marginalization the change which we have campaigned: changing the criteria process actually began for which we for housing, a core education for all, burden immediately after the campaigned sharing, the requisite cuts in Yeshiva budgets.”3 collapse of the Camp In this, Lapid e#ectively made changing societal David conference in 2000 arrangements with the Haredim one of the new and the outbreak of the government’s top priorities. !e prime minister, Second Intifada, and has strengthened in recent who wanted the new coalition to include the years. A consensus opinion has crystallized in current member parties and the ultra-Orthodox Israeli society that questions the probability of a parties, was forced to come to terms with a reality diplomatic breakthrough vis-à-vis the Palestinian that encumbers him with a political agenda Authority, and of achieving a peace agreement. he never wanted. !is new reality also found 67% agreed with the statement, “regardless of expression in the agreements the prime minister which party wins the elections, the peace process ultimately reached with his coalition partners. !e with the Palestinians will remain stuck for reasons key points are discussed below. unrelated to Israel, and there is no chance for any progress in the foreseeable future.”4 !is consensus THE JEWISH PEOPLE POLICY INSTITUTE 191 has marginalized the Palestinian issue in favor of and with the two-bloc constellation no longer other topics on the national agenda, allowing a central element in coalition-building tactics, a focus on a more ‘civil’ agenda compared to the ultra-Orthodox have lost their bargaining previous years. !is preference has been evident position. !is was especially visible in the pact in every sector of Israeli society, but it has been between Yesh Atid and HaBayit HaYehudi, two especially salient among centrist and center-left parties with several political disagreements. !ey voters who, in previous years, had placed greater managed to locate considerable common ground emphasis on the peace issue. In 2013, they opted on other issues deemed more urgent by their to give priority to the top domestic/internal issues: leaders, allowing them to join forces despite their religion, society, and the economy (80% of Yesh political divide. Atid voters; 51% of all voters).5 !is shift not only !e Frustration of the Silent Majority impacted the 2013 For a while now, there has been a widespread !e perception election results, but also sentiment in the public discourse objecting that a the shaping of the new to what many Israelis regard as ‘minority rule.’ minority rules coalition. Historically, the Di#erent groups have identified this minority the majority political parties tended according to their worldviews: at times it has leads to to align in a right-left been the settlers, whom the Israeli left perceives agitation bloc formation – i.e.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2016 Annual Report
    Research. Debate. Impact. 2016 ANNUAL REPORT 1 Table of Contents Message from the President and the Chairman of the Board 4 Sixth Meeting of IDI's International Advisory Council 8 The Center for Democratic Values and Institutions 11 The Center for Religion, Nation and State 23 The Center for Governance and the Economy 29 The Center for Security and Democracy 35 The Guttman Center for Surveys and Public Policy Research 41 IDI in the Media 47 Our Team 50 Our Leaders 51 Our Partners 52 Financials 53 Message from the President and the Chairman of the Board Dear Friends, 2016 was a year of change and upheaval throughout the jobs available to Haredim. The government adopted most of democratic world. Set against the tumult of Brexit and the the recommendations and is now in the process of allocating US elections, Israel seemed at times like an island of stability. a half-billion-shekel budget in line with these proposals. This However, under the surface, Israeli society is changing, and IDI success story illustrates the potential of turning relatively small took on a leading role in identifying those changes and working philanthropic investments into large-scale transformational with policymakers to address them. change by affecting policy and legislation on the basis of outstanding applied research. As the report that follows lays out, 2016 was a year rich in activity and achievements. In this letter, we have chosen to single Several new scholars joined our team in 2016. Ms. Daphna out the impact one program had on government policy in the Aviram-Nitzan, former director of research for the Israel employment area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Israeli Anti-Boycott Law: Should Artists Be Worried?
    Peled.Note-final for publisher (Do Not Delete) 4/24/2014 4:42 PM THE ISRAELI ANTI-BOYCOTT LAW: SHOULD ARTISTS BE WORRIED? INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 752 I. THE ORIGIN AND SCOPE OF BOYCOTTS AGAINST ISRAEL ............... 752 A. The Arab League Boycott ................................................. 752 B. The Palestinian BDS Movement: Combining the Goals of the Arab League, the Methods of the African National Congress, and the Rhetoric of Apartheid ....................... 753 C. International Manifestations of the Cultural Boycott on Israel ............................................................................... 756 D. Domestic Manifestations of the Cultural Boycott on Israel ............................................................................... 759 II. LEGISLATIVE RESPONSE TO THE BDS CAMPAIGN: THE LAW FOR PREVENTION OF HARM TO THE STATE OF ISRAEL BY MEANS OF BOYCOTT................................................................................ 762 A. Textual Analysis of the Anti-Boycott Law ........................ 763 B. Legislative History of the Anti-Boycott Law ..................... 766 C. Applicability of the Anti-Boycott Law to Foreign Nationals Located Abroad.............................................. 768 D. Potential Domestic Israeli Application of the Anti-Boycott Law ................................................................................. 772 III. THE ISRAELI SUPREME COURT SHOULD FIND THE ANTI-BOYCOTT LAW UNCONSTITUTIONAL .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Pre-Feasibility Study on Water Conveyance Routes to the Dead
    A PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY ON WATER CONVEYANCE ROUTES TO THE DEAD SEA Published by Arava Institute for Environmental Studies, Kibbutz Ketura, D.N Hevel Eilot 88840, ISRAEL. Copyright by Willner Bros. Ltd. 2013. All rights reserved. Funded by: Willner Bros Ltd. Publisher: Arava Institute for Environmental Studies Research Team: Samuel E. Willner, Dr. Clive Lipchin, Shira Kronich, Tal Amiel, Nathan Hartshorne and Shae Selix www.arava.org TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 HISTORICAL REVIEW 5 2.1 THE EVOLUTION OF THE MED-DEAD SEA CONVEYANCE PROJECT ................................................................... 7 2.2 THE HISTORY OF THE CONVEYANCE SINCE ISRAELI INDEPENDENCE .................................................................. 9 2.3 UNITED NATIONS INTERVENTION ......................................................................................................... 12 2.4 MULTILATERAL COOPERATION ............................................................................................................ 12 3 MED-DEAD PROJECT BENEFITS 14 3.1 WATER MANAGEMENT IN ISRAEL, JORDAN AND THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY ............................................... 14 3.2 POWER GENERATION IN ISRAEL ........................................................................................................... 18 3.3 ENERGY SECTOR IN THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY .................................................................................... 20 3.4 POWER GENERATION IN JORDAN ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Letterhead 2014.07
    Wednesday, July 16, 2014 This most recent wave of rocket attacks on Israeli population centers serve as a reminder that asymmetric warfare poses a fundamental challenge to Israel’s national security, international standing, and democratic character. For a democracy like Israel, finding a way to defeat terrorist organizations within the bounds of the rule of law is essential for three reasons: first, no independent government can tolerate a threat that sends masses of its citizens to the shelters at a moment’s notice; second, no society can long remain free if it continually sacrifices its liberties on the altar of national security; and third, no democracy can maintain its standing among the family of enlightened nations if it does not adhere to the international norms of armed conflict. Twelve years ago, in the midst of a deadly wave of suicide attacks, the leadership of IDI established the National Security and Democracy Program. Born out of a dialogue with the leadership of the Israel Defense Forces, this flagship program seeks to help Israeli decision makers develop effective counterterrorism policies that strike a balance between national security, civil liberties and the rule of law. To help concerned parties in Israel and around the world understand the legal aspects of this extraordinary conflict, the leaders of IDI’s National Security and Democracy Program have put together a brief outlining the basic legal concepts involved and the boundaries of permissible action according to standard interpretations of existing international law. The authors of this brief are internationally recognized experts on the legal aspects of asymmetric warfare and counterterrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • Burden Sharing and the Haredim
    8 Burden Sharing and the Haredim On March 12, 2014 the Knesset passed, on its which scholars should remain exempt, but also third reading, Amendment 19 to the Military states that draft evaders will be subject to arrest if Service Law, which aims to widen the participation quotas are unmet. !e comprehensive exemption of Ultra-Orthodox young men and yeshiva granting all Haredi yeshiva students aged 22 students in military and civilian national service. and over who join the workforce is of particular !is amendment also aims to promote their significance. integration into the working population. On April 17, 2014, the Ministerial Committee on Background: !e History of Burden Sharing in Military Service set concrete steps for the amendment’s implementation the Exemption (!e Arrangement and follow up. !ese were given the force of a for Deferral of Army Service Cabinet resolution. Under the new arrangement, by Yeshiva Students) the amendment will take full e"ect on July 1, Compulsory military service applies under the 2017, following an adjustment period. When in Security Service Law (Combined Version) of 1986. full force, the military or civilian national service According to this law, Israeli citizens are subject inductees will number 5,200 a year (two thirds to conscription at age 18 unless granted an of the age cohort according to current figures). exemption. Exemption was the subject of lively Until then, yeshiva students will be able to defer debates between yeshiva heads and the political their enlistment and receive an exemption at age leadership in the early days of the state. !e 22, as long as the yeshivot meet their recruitment executive committee of the Center for Service targets, which will be implemented according to to the People considered the conscription of the mandated schedule: in 2014, a total of 3,800 yeshiva students, and in March 1948 authorized Haredim are expected to join the IDF or national a temporary army service deferment for yeshiva service; in 2015, 4,500; and 5,200 in the years that students whose occupation was Torah study.1 follow.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Speakers on Israel 2004-2005
    Consulate General of Israel to New England We are pleased to present to you the 2004-2005 edition of the Consulate General of Israel’s Speakers Bureau “Guide to Speakers on Israel.” We are grateful for the vast wealth of resources that our speakers can provide to you and to us. Our speakers come Guide to Speakers from many different walks of life, vary in their fields of expertise, and can address a wide array of topics. Unlike the picture of Israel that is depicted through news reports, these on Israel speakers paint diverse views of life in Israel – politics, technology, arts, and culture – as seen through their own eyes. Each individual can provide his or her own views about the daily challenges and achievements that affect Israelis and Americans alike. We encourage you to use these speakers as a window into the diverse and rich culture that is Israel. We thank you for your continued support and hope you will take advantage of this excellent resource. We encourage you to bring these speakers to both familiar and unfamiliar audiences – their messages are universal. Hillel Newman 2004-2005 Consul 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Three Easy Steps to Book a Speaker 1) Choose your speaker or topic. When requesting a speaker, you Welcome .................................1 Professors & Researchers can either request a specific speaker by name, or you can simply How to book a speaker............3 Tal Ben-Shahar .................... 19 provide us with a general topic, and the Speakers Bureau staff will Ehud Eiran........................... 20 match the topic with an appropriate speaker. A list of speakers Consulate Officials Tamar Frankel.....................
    [Show full text]
  • Israel Has Been Home to a Renaissance of Jewish Culture
    INTRODUCTION Israel celebrates its 70th birthday this year, 2018, on 19 April. After 2,000 years of exile and persecution, the Jewish people have made up for lost time now that they finally have a state of their own again. Israel has flourished in its first 70 years of statehood and achieved more than many far older countries. Here are 70 of Israel’s achievements we are highlighting – from the sublime and world changing to the small but important: ISRAEL HAS ACHIEVED ITS CORE MISSION OF PROVIDING A STATE FOR THE JEWS WHERE THEY CAN BE FREE FROM PERSECUTION Israel, the only Jewish state, is open to all Jews. It serves as a lifeboat state for Jews from around the world. It provided refuge for many European Jews after the Holocaust, with 25% of the population in the 1960s being Holocaust survivors. If the Jewish people had had a state of their own in the 1930s, many more Jews would have been saved from the Holocaust. Israel survived an attack by 4 neighboring armies when it declared Independence in 1948. Israel has achieved peace with both Egypt and Newly formed Israel built an army to Jordan after multiple wars. defend itself with 50% of the soldiers being Holocaust survivors. In 1979 Israel withdrew from the Sinai Peninsula in return for normalising relations and demilitarisation of the Sinai. This agreement ended any prospect of another general Arab-Israeli war and has been a cornerstone of regional stability for nearly 40 years. Israel and Jordan signed a peace agreement in 1994. Not only did Israel achieve a successful emergency rescue of 14,500 Ethiopian Jews, nearly the entire Jewish population of Ethiopia, in under 36 hours, but it also broke the world record of carrying the most passengers on a 747 or any flying vehicle in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Netanyahu Soundly Defeats Chief Rival in Israeli Elections
    Middle East Netanyahu Soundly Defeats Chief Rival in Israeli Elections By Jodi Rudoren, March 17, 2015 TEL AVIV — After a bruising campaign focused on his failings, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel won a clear victory in Tuesday’s elections and seemed all but certain to form a new government and serve a fourth term, though he offended many voters and alienated allies in the process. With 99.5 percent of the ballots counted, the YNet news site reported Wednesday morning that Mr. Netanyahu’s Likud Party had captured 29 or 30 of the 120 seats in Parliament, sweeping past his chief rival, the center-left Zionist Union alliance, which got 24 seats. Mr. Netanyahu and his allies had seized on earlier exit polls that showed a slimmer Likud lead to create an aura of inevitability, and celebrated with singing and dancing. While his opponents vowed a fight, Israeli political analysts agreed even before most of the ballots were counted that he had the advantage, with more seats having gone to the right-leaning parties likely to support him. It was a stunning turnabout from the last pre-election polls published Friday, which showed the Zionist Union, led by Isaac Herzog, with a four- or five-seat lead and building momentum, and the Likud polling close to 20 seats. To bridge the gap, Mr. Netanyahu embarked on a last-minute scorched-earth campaign, promising that no Palestinian state would be established as long as he remained in office and insulting Arab citizens. Mr. Netanyahu, who served as prime minister for three years in the 1990s and returned to office in 2009, exulted in what he called “a huge victory” and said he had spoken to the heads of all the parties “in the national camp” and urged them to help him form a government “without any further ado.” “I am proud of the Israeli people that, in the moment of truth, knew how to separate between what’s important or what’s not and to stand up for what’s important,” he told an exuberant crowd early Wednesday morning at Likud’s election party at the Tel Aviv Fairgrounds.
    [Show full text]
  • POST-ELECTIONS UPDATE April 2015
    POST-ELECTIONS UPDATE April 2015 Israel’s Arab Citizens and the 2015 General Elections: Post-election Review In the General Elections of 2015, Arab citizens achieved greater prominence in Israel and on the world stage than any time in recent history. Successful creation of the Joint List – a merger of the 2 Arab and 1 Jewish-Arab parties that formerly represented Arab society in the Knesset – raised the profile of Arab political domestic aspirations in Israel and inspired Arab voters to come out in higher numbers. In addition, controversy surrounding PM Benjamin Netanyahu’s comments about Arab voters in the last hours of the campaign made headlines within Israel, the Jewish diaspora, and among Israel’s international relations. Now, with 13 mandates, the Joint List is taking its first steps to address issues important to the Arab community and cement its place in the 20th Knesset. Arab voting participation rates, election results, and controversial campaigning all set the tone for the new reality in which the Joint List is takes its place as the third largest political party. Election Results The Joint List secured 13 seats in the new Knesset (12 filled by Arab MKs and 1 by Jewish MK from Hadash.) This is two seats more than the Arab and Jewish-Arab parties secured by running individually in 2013. Joint List leaders hoped to win as many as 14-15 seats, enough to function as an obstructive block to a right-wing government. Thus, the result comes with some disappointment. At 13 seats and a right-wing government, Joint List MKs may find it “difficult to present significant achievements to the constituents, achievements that will prove to them that the unification was worth it.”1 Overall there are fewer parties in the 20th Knesset (the number dropped from 14 to 10 due to the higher electoral 1 Eldar, Shlomi.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel 2019 Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals
    IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS National Review ISRAEL 2019 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS National Review ISRAEL 2019 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Acknowledgments are due to representatives of government ministries and agencies as well as many others from a variety of organizations, for their essential contributions to each chapter of this book. Many of these bodies are specifically cited within the relevant parts of this report. The inter-ministerial task force under the guidance of Ambassador Yacov Hadas-Handelsman, Israel’s Special Envoy for Sustainability and Climate Change of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and Galit Cohen, Senior Deputy Director General for Planning, Policy and Strategy of the Ministry of Environmental Protection, provided invaluable input and support throughout the process. Special thanks are due to Tzruya Calvão Chebach of Mentes Visíveis, Beth-Eden Kite of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Amit Yagur-Kroll of the Israel Central Bureau of Statistics, Ayelet Rosen of the Ministry of Environmental Protection and Shoshana Gabbay for compiling and editing this report and to Ziv Rotshtein of the Ministry of Environmental Protection for editorial assistance. 3 FOREWORD The international community is at a crossroads of countries. Moreover, our experience in overcoming historical proportions. The world is experiencing resource scarcity is becoming more relevant to an extreme challenges, not only climate change, but ever-increasing circle of climate change affected many social and economic upheavals to which only areas of the world. Our cooperation with countries ambitious and concerted efforts by all countries worldwide is given broad expression in our VNR, can provide appropriate responses. The vision is much of it carried out by Israel’s International clear.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Israeli Democracy (2011)
    Measuring Israeli Democracy (2011): Epistemological, Methodological, and Ethical Dilemmas Paper prepared for presentation at the WZB, Berlin, 23 January, 2012 Prof. Tamar Hermann* The Open University of Israel & the Israel Democracy Institute Draft, not for citation *Email address: [email protected] Personal homepage: http://www.openu.ac.il/Personal_sites/tamar-hermannE.html 1 This paper aims at presenting, from a reflective perspective, the various dilemmas facing the team conducting the Israeli Democracy Index annual research project in general and its 2011 edition1 in particular. After dealing generally with the issue of measuring democracy and contextualizing this project in the “universe” of similar measurements/indices/barometers, the article will focus on the epistemological, methodological, and ethical dilemmas to be dealt with when assessing—by surveying public opinion—the democratic qualities of the Israeli regime, which are closely linked, it will be maintained here, to its unique political system and complex political situation. This will be done with a number of illustrations and through references to findings of the latest, as well as previous, Israeli Democracy annual reports. Introduction: In a nutshell—why and how to measure democracy? Since the mid twentieth century, global political discourse has been idolizing democracy. This regime type is widely perceived as the only one which—at least in principle—respects the universally most highly cherished set of human rights and civil rights. Democracy in general and liberal democracy in particular are therefore almost unanimously considered as morally superior to all others regimes, past, present, and perhaps even future. Thus, today, especially in the West but also in other parts of the world, very few dare publicly to foster and legitimize any other form of government even if in fact they ideologically or practically do endorse it.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Resistance Among Israel's Arab-Palestinian Minority
    Doron Matza Matza Doron Patterns of Resistance among Israel’s Arab-Palestinian Minority: A Historical Review and a Look to the Future to and a Look Minority: A Historical Review Arab-Palestinian among Israel’s of Resistance Patterns COVER Doron Matza Patterns of Resistance among Israel’s Arab-Palestinian Minority A Historical Review and a Look to the Future 170 Memorandum 170 Doron Matza Patterns of Resistance among Israel’s Arab-Palestinian Minority A Historical Review and a Look to the Future Institute for National Security Studies The Institute for National Security Studies (INSS), incorporating the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies, was founded in 2006. The purpose of the Institute for National Security Studies is first, to conduct basic research that meets the highest academic standards on matters related to Israel’s national security as well as Middle East regional and international security affairs. Second, the Institute aims to contribute to the public debate and governmental deliberation of issues that are – or should be – at the top of Israel’s national security agenda. INSS seeks to address Israeli decision makers and policymakers, the defense establishment, public opinion makers, the academic community in Israel and abroad, and the general public. INSS publishes research that it deems worthy of public attention, while it maintains a strict policy of non-partisanship. The opinions expressed in this publication are the author’ s alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Institute, its trustees, boards, research staff, or the organizations and individuals that support its research. Doron Matza Patterns of Resistance among Israel’s Arab-Palestinian Minority A Historical Review and a Look to the Future Memorandum No.
    [Show full text]