DOCSLIB.ORG

Regolamento Fantaeurovision

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regolamento Fantaeurovision Regolamento FantaEurovision - Ogni giocatore ha a disposizione 100 draghi1 per acquistare 5 degli artisti in gara - È obbligatorio schierare una squadra di 5 artisti e nominare capitano uno di loro - È possibile iscrivere la squadra entro lunedì 17 maggio 2021 alle ore 23.59 - I bonus e i malus per ogni artista verranno attribuiti in base al regolamento sottostante: qualora la valutazione di un bonus o di un malus dovesse essere soggettiva, spetterà alla FIF2 l’ultima parola che valuterà l’accaduto in modo professionale, incondizionato e obiettivo - I bonus e i malus della finale dell’artista nominato capitano verranno raddoppiati - L’assegnazione dei bonus e dei malus si applica agli artisti a partire dal primo minuto dell’Eurovision Song Contest fino al termine della diretta della serata finale (tutto ciò che avviene prima e dopo l’Eurovision Song Contest non verrà conteggiato) - Nel caso in cui un artista in gara dovesse risultare positivo al Covid-19 o fosse impossibilitato a raggiungere Rotterdam verrà utilizzata una esibizione di backup. In questo caso verranno comunque assegnati bonus e malus basandosi sull’esibizione di backup - Vince chi, terminata l’ultima puntata dell’Eurovision Song Contest, ha totalizzato il maggior numero di punti - Il regolamento potrà subire lievi variazioni da parte della FIF fino a lunedì 17 maggio 2021 alle ore 23.59 Bonus e Malus - Punti posizione in classifica della serata finale3: o 1° classificato = +50 o 2° classificato = +35 o 3° classificato = +25 o 4° e 5° classificato = +15 o 6°, 7°, 8°, 9°, 10° classificato = +10 o 11°, 12°, 13°, 14°, 15° classificato = +5 o 16°, 17°, 18°, 19° classificato = 0 o 20°, 21°, 22° classificato = -5 o 23°, 24°, 25° classificato = -10 o 26° classificato = +25 - Bonus Podio4 (valido per ogni artista che arriva nelle prime tre posizioni) = +10 - Punti posizione in classifica parziale semifinali 5: o L’artista con diritto di voto in serata è già qualificato in Finale (con o senza esibizione) = +30 o L’artista si qualifica alla Finale = +10 o L’artista non si qualifica alla Finale = -10 - Altri premi consegnati durante le puntate dell’Eurovision Song Contest = +25 - Standing ovation del pubblico dell’Eurovision Song Contest (il bonus non vale se il pubblico è sempre in piedi) = +25 - Il cantante suona anche uno strumento (bonus assegnato soltanto la prima volta che l’artista o un membro del gruppo canterà e suonerà contemporaneamente) = +10 - Tatuaggio in zone pubiche in bella vista = +20 - Capezzolo femminile in vista (il vedononvedo non conta) = +30 (per ogni capezzolo) 1Drago = moneta del FantaEurovision. 2Il giudizio della FIF (Federazione Italiana FantaSanremo) è insindacabile. 3Qualora alcune delle posizioni in classifica non vengano specificate, i punti di suddette posizioni non verranno assegnati. 4Il Bonus Podio è valido solo nell’ultima puntata ed è soggetto a raddoppio qualora il capitano arrivi tra i primi 3 classificati. - Capezzolo maschile in vista (il vedononvedo non conta) = +10 (per ogni capezzolo) - Artista scalzo pre, durante o post-esibizione = +10 - Artista indossa come ornamento o porta con sé fiori veri = +10 - Animali veri sul palco durante l’esibizione = +10 - Twerking durante l’esibizione = +10 - Bacio sulla guancia sul palco dell’Ahloy (sulla bocca raddoppia, alla francese triplica) = +10 - Gesti e/o simboli pro LGBTQ+ = +10 - L’artista, i ballerini o i performer indossano o portano vestiti, gadgets, trucco, parrucco o altro con i colori della bandiera del paese per il quale l’artista gareggia = +10 - L’artista, i ballerini o i performer portano sul palco durante l’esibizione la bandiera del paese per il quale l’artista gareggia = +20 - Ballerini durante l’esibizione = +10 - Altri tipi di coreografie con la partecipazione di performer non in gara (esclusi i ballerini) = +20 - Utilizzo di fuochi d’artificio durante l’esibizione = +20 - Parole di ringraziamento post-esibizione = +5 - Commozione con evidente lacrimazione durante o al termine dell’esibizione = +10 - Primo artista ad esibirsi (ogni serata) = +10 - Ultimo artista ad esibirsi (ogni serata) = +10 - Parolacce pre o post esibizione, non contano le parolacce nel testo5 = +20 - Insulti o gesti provocatori contro il pubblico (diverso dall’incitamento) = +30 - Invasione di palco non programmata durante l’esibizione = +50 - L’artista dice espressamente la parola FantaEurovision durante interviste, comunicazioni social e/o ospitate6 (bonus assegnato soltanto la prima volta che l’artista dirà espressamente la parola FantaEurovision al di fuori dal palco dell’Ahoy) = +50 - L’artista dice espressamente la parola FantaEurovision sul palco dell’Ahoy = +100 - Morte durante la settimana dell’Eurovision Song Contest (dalla semifinale alla finale, ma non durante l'esibizione) = +500 - Morte durante l'esibizione = +1000 - Utilizzo dell’autotune (malus assegnabile una sola volta ad artista, al primo utilizzo) = -10 - Artista siede sul palco, sulle scale o a terra durante l’esibizione = -10 - Inciampo o caduta involontaria durante l'esibizione = -25 - Utilizzo dello stesso abito in semifinale e in finale = -10 - Caduta o spostamento vistoso della dentiera = -30 - Caduta del parrucchino = -30 - Fischi del pubblico = -30 - Problemi tecnici che causano l’interruzione del brano = -50 - Artista positivo al Covid-19 durante la settimana dell’Eurovision Song Contest7 = -50 - Bestemmia in diretta8 = -66,6 - Canzone e/o artista squalificati = -100 FIF Federazione Italiana FantaSanremo 5La Fif assegnerà il bonus quando riuscirà a captare e/o comprendere le eventuali parolacce. La Fif è aperta a qualsiasi segnalazione che la possa aiutare. 6Il bonus verrà assegnato nella puntata successiva. 7Il malus verrà assegnato nella puntata successiva alla comunicazione di positività. 8La Fif assegnerà il malus quando riuscirà a captare e/o comprendere le eventuali bestemmie. La Fif è aperta a qualsiasi segnalazione che la possa aiutare. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eurovision’ European Contest ∗
    Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid https://repositorio.uam.es Esta es la versión de autor de la comunicación de congreso publicada en: This is an author produced version of a paper published in: WIMS '11: Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics, ACM, 2011. 25 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1988688.1988718 Copyright: © 2011 ACM El acceso a la versión del editor puede requerir la suscripción del recurso Access to the published version may require subscription A Study on the Impact of Crowd-Based Voting Schemes in the ’Eurovision’ European Contest ∗ Gema Bello Orgaz, Raul Cajias and David Camacho Computer Science Department Escuela Politécnica Superior Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Madrid, Spain {gema.bello, raul.cajias, david.camacho}@uam.es ABSTRACT Categories and Subject Descriptors The Eurovision contest has been the reference on european H.3.3 [Information Systems]: Information Storage and song contests for the past 50 years. Countries in the Euro- Retrieval|Information Search and Retrieval, Clustering pean Union can shows the rest of the participants their cur- rent music tendencies. This phenomena has been studied in General Terms domains like physic and social sciences to find correlations CPM, Edge Betweenness, Data Mining, Eurovision, Televot- between contests and current political and socio-economy ing, Voting Partnership trends in EU. The inclusion of web and social technologies some years ago, have caused a disruption in the traditional voting system whereby the audience is encouraged to par- Keywords ticipate by casting votes for their favorite song. As a result, Graph Based Algorithms, Network, Web Mining, Social Min- this system yields new, relevant information that may be ex- ing trapolated to social and political tendencies in Europe with a higher degree accuracy than by data collected using the 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender and Geopolitics in the Eurovision Song Contest Introduction
    Gender and Geopolitics in the Eurovision Song Contest Introduction Catherine Baker Lecturer, University of Hull [email protected] http://www.suedosteuropa.uni-graz.at/cse/en/baker Contemporary Southeastern Europe, 2015, 2(1), 74-93 Contemporary Southeastern Europe is an online, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, scholarly, and policy-oriented research on issues relevant to societies in Southeastern Europe. For more information, please contact us at [email protected] or visit our website at www.contemporarysee.org Introduction: Gender and Geopolitics in the Eurovision Song Contest Catherine Baker* Introduction From the vantage point of the early 1990s, when the end of the Cold War not only inspired the discourses of many Eurovision performances but created opportunities for the map of Eurovision participation itself to significantly expand in a short space of time, neither the scale of the contemporary Eurovision Song Contest (ESC) nor the extent to which a field of “Eurovision research” has developed in cultural studies and its related disciplines would have been recognisable. In 1993, when former Warsaw Pact states began to participate in Eurovision for the first time and Yugoslav successor states started to compete in their own right, the contest remained a one-night-per- year theatrical presentation staged in venues that accommodated, at most, a couple of thousand spectators and with points awarded by expert juries from each participating country. Between 1998 and 2004, Eurovision’s organisers, the European Broadcasting Union (EBU), and the national broadcasters responsible for hosting each edition of the contest expanded it into an ever grander spectacle: hosted in arenas before live audiences of 10,000 or more, with (from 2004) a semi-final system enabling every eligible country and broadcaster to participate each year, and with (between 1998 and 2008) points awarded almost entirely on the basis of telephone voting by audiences in each participating state.
    [Show full text]
  • Identity, Spectacle and Representation: Israeli Entries at the Eurovision
    Identity, spectacle and representation: Israeli entries at the Eurovision Song Contest1 Identidad, espectáculo y representación: las candidaturas de Israel en el Festival de la Canción de Eurovisión José Luis Panea holds a Degree in Fine Arts (University of Salamanca, 2013), and has interchange stays at Univer- sity of Lisbon and University of Barcelona. Master’s degree in Art and Visual Practices Research at University of Castilla-La Mancha with End of Studies Special Prize (2014) and Pre-PhD contract in the research project ARES (www.aresvisuals.net). Editor of the volume Secuencias de la experiencia, estadios de lo visible. Aproximaciones al videoarte español 2017) with Ana Martínez-Collado. Aesthetic of Modernity teacher and writer in several re- views especially about his research line ‘Identity politics at the Eurovision Song Contest’. Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, España. [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0002-8989-9547 Recibido: 01/08/2018 - Aceptado: 14/11/2018 Received: 01/08/2018 - Accepted: 14/11/2018 Abstract: Resumen: Through a sophisticated investment, both capital and symbolic, A partir de una sofisticada inversión, capital y simbólica, el Festival the Eurovision Song Contest generates annually a unique audio- de Eurovisión genera anualmente un espectáculo audiovisual en la ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978 visual spectacle, debating concepts as well as community, televisión pública problematizando conceptos como “comunidad”, Europeanness or cultural identity. Following the recent researches “Europeidad” e “identidad cultural”. Siguiendo las investigaciones re- from the An-glo-Saxon ambit, we will research different editions of cientes en el ámbito anglosajón, recorreremos sus distintas ediciones the show.
    [Show full text]
  • Inte Bara Bögarnas Fest” En Queer Kulturstudie Av Melodifestivalen
    ”Inte bara bögarnas fest” En queer kulturstudie av Melodifestivalen Institutionen för etnologi, religionshistoria och genusvetenskap Examensarbete 30 HP Mastersprogrammet i genusvetenskap 120 HP Vårterminen 2018 Författare: Olle Jilkén Handledare: Kalle Berggren Abstract Uppsatsen undersöker hur TV-programmet Melodifestivalen förhåller sig till sin homokulturella status genom att studera programmets heteronormativa ramar och porträttering av queerhet. Det teoretiska ramverket grundar sig i representationsteori, kulturstudier, gaystudier och queerteori. Analysen resulterar i att de heteronormativa ramarna framställer heterosexualitet som en given norm i programmet. Detta uppvisas bland annat av en implicit heterosexuell manlig blick som sexualiserar kvinnokroppar och ser avklädda män, queerhet och femininitet som något komiskt. Detta komplicerar tidigare studiers bild av melodifestivaler som huvudsakligen investerade och accepterande av queera subjekt. Den queera representationen består främst av homosexuella män. Den homosexuellt manliga identiteten görs inte enhetlig och bryter mot heteronormativa ideal i olika grad. Några sätt som den homosexuellt manliga identiteten porträtteras är artificiell, feminin, icke-monogam, barnslig och investerad i schlager. Analysen påpekar att programmet har queert innehåll trots dess kommersiella framställning och normativa ideal. Nyckelord: Melodifestivalen, schlager, genusvetenskap, homokultur, gaystudier, bögkultur, heteronormativitet. Innehållsförteckning 1. En älskad och hatad ”homofilfestival” 1
    [Show full text]
  • OGAE Contest Rulebook Table of Contents
    CONTEST RULEBOOK accepted by presidents on 18/03/2020 OGAE Contest Rulebook Table of Contents Table of Contents About ............................................................................................................................................................3 Contest Responsibilities .....................................................................................................................3 New Contests ........................................................................................................................................3 Contest Coordinator ................................................................................................................................4 Contest Rules .........................................................................................................................................4 Timetable ................................................................................................................................................5 OGAE Second Chance Contest ............................................................................................................6 General Rules .........................................................................................................................................6 Special Rules ..........................................................................................................................................8 Procedures ..............................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Does Winning Eurovision Impact a Country's Economy? Kendall Bard University of Tennessee, Knoxville, [email protected]
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange University of Tennessee Honors Thesis Projects University of Tennessee Honors Program 5-2018 Does Winning Eurovision Impact a Country's Economy? Kendall Bard University of Tennessee, Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj Part of the Economics Commons Recommended Citation Bard, Kendall, "Does Winning Eurovision Impact a Country's Economy?" (2018). University of Tennessee Honors Thesis Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/2160 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Tennessee Honors Program at Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Tennessee Honors Thesis Projects by an authorized administrator of Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Does Winning Eurovision Impact a Country’s Economy? Kendall Bard Advisor: Dr. Holladay Global Leadership Scholars, Class of 2018 Bard 2 Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................... 3 Contest History and Participants ............................................................................... 6 Voting and Entries .................................................................................................... 9 Win and Host History ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 'Gay Olympics'?: the Eurovision Song Contest and the Politics of LGBT/European Belonging Catherine Baker
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repository@Hull - CRIS The ‘Gay Olympics’?: The Eurovision Song Contest and the politics of LGBT/European belonging Catherine Baker (University of Hull) Accepted for publication in European Journal of International Relations Abstract The politics of gay and transgender visibility and representation at the Eurovision Song Contest, an annual televised popular music festival presented to viewers as a contest between European nations, show that processes of interest to Queer International Relations do not just involve states or even international institutions; national and transnational popular geopolitics over ‘LGBT rights’ and ‘Europeanness’ equally constitute the understandings of ‘the international’ with which Queer IR is concerned. Building on Cynthia Weber’s reading the persona of the 2014 Eurovision winner Conchita Wurst with ‘queer intellectual curiosity’, this paper demonstrates that Eurovision shifted from, in the late 1990s, an emerging site of gay and trans visibility to, by 2008–14, part of a larger discursive circuit taking in international mega-events like the Olympics, international human-rights advocacy, Europe/Russia relations, and the politics of state homophobia and transphobia. Contest organisers thus had to take positions – ranging from detachment to celebration – about ‘LGBT’ politics in host states and the Eurovision region. The construction of spatio-temporal hierarchies around attitudes to LGBT rights, however, revealed exclusions that corroborate other critical arguments on the reconfiguration of national and European identities around ‘LGBT equality’. Introduction The theoretical interventions of Queer International Relations, which recognise how sexualities and gender non-conformity are embedded in international politics, have ‘transformative’ potential for International Relations (Langlois, 2015: 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Your Guide to Ebu Services
    YOUR GUIDE TO EBU SERVICES 1 The European Broadcasting Union (EBU) is the world’s foremost alliance of public service media (PSM). Our mission is to make PSM indispensable. We have 115 Member organizations in 56 countries in Europe, and an additional 31 Associates in Asia, Australasia, Africa and the Americas. Our Members operate almost 2,000 television, radio and online channels and services and offer a wealth of content across other platforms. Together, they reach audiences of more than one billion people around the world, broadcasting in almost 160 languages. We are one EBU with two distinct fields of activity: Member Services and Business Services. Our Member Services strive to secure a sustainable future for public service media, provide our Members with a centre for learning and sharing, and build on our founding ethos of solidarity and cooperation to provide an exchange of world-class news, sports news, and music. Our Business Services, operating as Eurovision Services, are the media industry’s premier distributor and producer of high-quality live news, sport and entertainment with over 70,000 transmissions and 100,000 hours of news and sport every year. We return the profits of Business Services to the organization for the benefit of Members. 2 2 WELCOME TO THE EBU! As a Member, you are part of a unique community of media organizations from 56 countries that together provide a powerful voice championing and upholding the values of PSM. We are a network of like-minded people that not only share the same ideals but come together to share knowledge, ideas and inspiration.
    [Show full text]
  • Intrattenimento Eurovision Song Contest 2021
    Intrattenimento Eurovision song contest 2021 @ Semifinali Finale martedì 18 e giovedì 20 maggio sabato 22 maggio alle 20.35 alle 20.35 @ @ Rai Radio 1 proporrà finestre di approfondimento all’interno di Prima Fila e dei Gr* con Ema Stokholma e Saverio Raimondo *salvo variazioni editoriali Una nuova era, lo spirito di sempre lo slogan i nostri rappresentanti la sede «Open up» Måneskin Rotterdam, Paesi Bassi vincitori di Sanremo 2021 il format abbattimento delle frontiere Un evento ad alto tasso emozionale che unisce multiculturalismo le persone sotto la bandiera della musica inclusività diversitàarte si trasforma Eurovision non si piega, Ascolti 2020 ascolto medio share % 2.800.000 11 individui individui affinità 139 115 donne 15-24 laurea fonte Auditel/Nielsen Tam Impaginazione finale su Rai 1 break access break access break A break B break C break D 20.35 20.55 21.40 22.20 23.20 24.05 Eurovision song contest 2021 billboard 20.56 billboard billboard anteprima 24.34 20.36 billboard anteprima 20.50 gli orari possono subire variazioni impaginazione vincolata alla trasmissione in eurovisione Impaginazione semifinali su Rai 4 break access break A break B break C 20.55 21.30 22.00 22.30 Eurovision song contest 2021 billboard 20.56 billboard 22.55 Modalità di vendita moduli evento* break interni A/B/C venduti a pacchetto sulla finale di Rai 1 e sulle due semifinali di Rai 4 pacchetti disponibili su spot, spot p/u, fuori break, intro break, billboard e inviti all'ascolto acquisto in libera break access di Rai 1 e Rai 4 break D di Rai 1 su formati/posizioni
    [Show full text]
  • Eurovision Song Contest 1970Er Jahre
    Alle 1. Platzierten in der ESC-Geschichte Eurovision Song Contest 1950er Jahre Jahr Austragungsort Gewinner 1956 Lugano, Schweiz Lys Assia, Schweiz Song:„Refrain“ 1957 Frankfurt, Corry Brokken, Deutschland Niederlande Song: „Net als toen“ 1958 Hilversum, André Claveau, Niederlande Frankreich Song: „Dors, mon amour“ 1959 Cannes, Frankreich Teddy Scholten, Niederlande Song: „Een beetje“ Eurovision Song Contest 1960er Jahre Jahr Austragungsort Gewinner 1960 London, Jacqueline Boyer, Großbritannien Frankreich Song: „Tom Pillibi“ 1961 Cannes, Frankreich Jean Claude Pascal, Luxemburg Song: „Nous les amoureux“ 1962 Luxemburg, Isabelle Aubert, Luxemburg Frankreich Song: „Un premier amour“ 1963 London, Grethe & Jorgen Großbritannien Ingmann, Dänemark Song: „Dansevise“ 1964 Kopenhagen, Gigliola Cinquetti, Dänemark Italien Song: „Non ho l’eta (per amarti)“ 1965 Neapel, Italien France Gall, Luxemburg Song: „Poupée de circe, poupée de son“ 1966 Luxemburg, Udo Jürgens, Luxemburg Österreich Song: „Merci Chérie“ 1967 Wien, Österreich Sandie Shaw, Großbritannien Song: „Puppet On A String“ 1968 London, Massiel, Spanien Großbritannien Song: „ La La La“ 1969 Madrid, Spanien Lenny Kuhr, Niederlande Song: „Vivo cantando“ Eurovision Song Contest 1970er Jahre Jahr Austragungsort Gewinner 1970 Amsterdam, Dana, Irland Niederlande „All Kinds Od Everything“ 1971 Dublin, Irland Séverine, Monaco Song: „Un banc, u narbe, un rue“ 1972 Edinburgh, Vicky Leandros, Großbritannien Luxemburg Song: „Après toi“ 1973 Luxemburg, Anne-Marie David, Luxemburg Luxemburg Song: Tu te
    [Show full text]
  • Eurovision Song Contest
    Eurovision Song Contest The Eurovision Song Contest is an annual competition held among active member countries of the European Broadcasting Union (EBU). Each member country submits a song to be performed on live television and then casts votes for the other countries' songs to determine the most popular song in the competition. Each country participates via one of their national EBU-member television stations, whose task it is to select a singer and a song to represent their country in the international competition. The Contest has been broadcast every year since its inauguration in 1956 and is one of the longest-running television programmes in the world. It is also one of the most-watched non-sporting events in the world, with audience figures having been quoted in recent years as anything between 100 million and 600 million internationally. Eurovision has also been broadcast outside Europe to such places as Argentina, Australia, Canada, China, Egypt, India, Japan, Jordan, Mexico, New Zealand, the Philippines, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand and Uruguay despite the fact that they do not compete. Since the year 2000, the Contest has also been broadcast over the Internet. Origins In the 1950s, as a war-torn Europe rebuilt itself, the European Broadcasting Union (EBU)—based in Switzerland—set up a committee to search for ways of bringing together the countries of the EBU around a "light entertainment programme".At a committee meeting held in Monaco in January 1955, director general of Swiss television and committee chairman Marcel Bezençon conceived the idea of an international song contest where countries would participate in one television programme, to be transmitted simultaneously to all countries of the union.
    [Show full text]
  • Nation Branding, National Identity and the Eurovision Song Contest in Estonia Politics and Society in the Baltic Sea Region 2
    This book provides a unique and intriguing insight into current debates concerning the relationship between nation and state Jordan Paul as well as the political management of international image in today’s Europe through an examination of debates on nation branding and the Eurovision Song Contest. Europe is a con- tested construct and its boundaries are subject to redefinition. This work aims to advance critical thinking about contempo- rary nation branding and its relationship to, and influence on, Paul Jordan nation building. In particular it focusses on key identity debates The Modern Tale Fairy that the Eurovision Song Contest engendered in Estonia in the run-up to EU accession. The Eurovision Song Contest is an event which is often dismissed as musically and culturally The Modern Fairy Tale: inferior. However, this work demonstrates that it has the capac- ity to shed light on key identity debates and illuminate wider Nation Branding, National Identity socio-political issues. Using a series of in-depth interviews with and the Eurovision Song Contest political elites, media professionals and opinion leaders, this book is a valuable contribution to the growing field of research in Estonia on nation branding and the Eurovision Song Contest. Paul Jordan obtained his PhD from the University of Glasgow in 2011. His research interests include nation building and nation branding of post-communist states, national identity and nationalist politics. He is also a regular media commenta- tor on the Eurovision Song Contest. Politics and Society in the Baltic Sea Region Politics and Society ISBN 978-9949-32-558-0 2 in the Baltic Sea Region 9 789949 325580 > www.tyk.ee 2 Politics and Society in the Baltic Sea Region 2 Paul Jordan The Modern Fairy Tale: Nation Branding, National Identity and the Eurovision Song Contest in Estonia Politics and Society in the Baltic Sea Region 2 Politics and Society in the Baltic Sea Region is a series devoted to contemporary social and political issues in the countries surrounding the Baltic Sea.
    [Show full text]