DOCSLIB.ORG

1938 Journal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

— — ^1) I OCTOBER TERM, 1938 .T^Z^, STATISTICS Original Appellate Total Number of cases on docket 13 1, 007 1,020 Cases disposed of __ __ 1 922 923 Remaining on docket- _ ____ 12 85 97 Cases disposed of By written opinions 174 By per curiam opinions 65 By denial or dismissal of petitions for certiorari 676 By motion to dismiss or per stipulation 8 Number of written opinions 139 Number of admissions to bar 1, 075 RETEEENCE INDEX Page Cardozo, J., death of, announced 1 Cardozo, J., resolutions of the Bar presented by Attorney Gen- eral Cummings 91 Brandeis, J., correspondence upon retirement 166 Frankfurter, J., commission read and oath taken (January 30, 1939) 131 Douglas, J., commission read and oath taken (April 17, 1939). 194 Frank Murphy, Attorney General, presented 115 Allotment of Justices 106, 145, 209 Disbarment, in the matter of W. A. Denson 6,85,103,129 J. William Tomlinson 7 Walter C. Balderston 159 William H. GrifSn 182,225 Pierce Lonergan 210,247 Rules of Supreme Court, general revision announced 155 Bankruptcy, revision of the General Orders and Forms 138 Admiralty Rules revised 233 Copyright Rule 1 amended 247 Counsel appointed to argue (No. 359 and Ex Parte Holchak) __ 36, 69 Judgment amended (Nos. 3, 294, 528) 84, 182, 191 Opinion amended (Nos. 3, 127, 312, 441, 498, 449, 441) 84, 169,175,233,248 99087—39 93 8 II Page Judgment affirmed by equally divided Court (Nos. 10, 104) 35, 119 Judgment in case on direct appeal from U. S. District Court affirmed, on consideration of jurisdictional statements, on ground that questions were so unsubstantial as not to need further argument, citing Rule 7, par. 4. (No. 643) 159 Notice to Attorney General under Act of August 24, 1937 (No. 277) 10,39,44 Habeas corpus—rule to show cause issued (Ex Parte Holchak) 7,69,139,145 Habeas corpus—motion for award of writ of, denied 78, 83 Moot case—motion of appellant to reverse on that ground granted (No. 567) 170,181 Appeal dismissed as to certain appellants on their own motion (No. 27) 2, 30, 64 Appeal dismissed on motion of appellants, later reinstated on motion (Nos. 146, 151) 3,51,60 Appeal dismissed as to one of two appellants (No. 368) 35 Appeal dismissed as to certain appellees (No. 329) 52 Appeal dismissed on ground appellants had no standing to raise validity of State statute under commerce clause (No. 112) 4 Appeal dismissed and certiorari granted (No. 158) 10 Appeal docketed and dismissed (Nos. 624, 728) 139, 170 Certiorari denied for failure to file within time provided by Criminal Appeals Rule XI (Nos. 301, 324, 636) 8, 153 (In No. 636 counsel by rehearing questioned Court's authority to limit time for filing to thirty days.) Certiorari denied for failure to file within time (No. 162) 16 Certiorari—motion for rule to show cause why certiorari should not issue denied without prejudice to the filing of a petition for certiorari in accordance with the rules of this Court (C. I. O. V, Hague). [Petitioner sought certiorari before judgment in the C. C. A. but, because the record had not yet been made up for the purpose of appeal to that court, compliance with Rule 38 was impossible.] 71, 72 Certiorari denied with two Justices dissenting (No. 6) 15, 62 Suggestion of diminution of record (No. 21) 2, 8 Motion as to printing record (No. 188) 15,52 Motion to enlarge record (Nos. 310, 311) 56, 61 Motion to file supplemental record (No. 418) 130,135 Motion to retax costs denied (No. 594 O. T. 1937) 2, Motion to tax costs denied without prejudice (No. 314) 168 Motion as to costs denied (No. 582) 242,248 Ill Motion for injunction denied (Arrow Distilleries v. Alex- Page ander) 104 Motion for injunction granted (No. 528) 105 Motion for stay and supersedeas granted (No. 221) 10 Stay granted (No. 651) 146 Motion for bail presented to the entire court and denied (Nar- done ^. U. S.) 236 Motion for bond denied (No. 367) 121,128 Motion to substitute and to make a new party denied (No. 22) _ 52 Motion to withdraw appearance (No. 277) 129 Motion to set aside judgment of this court on ground of dis- qualification of a Justice denied (No. 391) 182 Motion for recall and clarification of mandate denied (No. 16). [A further effort to obtain the relief sought was made by mandamus, motion for leave to file being denied.] _ 186, 191, 212, 219 Eehearing granted (No. 10, 372 O. T. 1937, 166, 76)__- 55, 62, 70, 145 Rehearing—motion for leave to file where petition for certio- rari was denied at prior term, denied (No. 848 O. T. 1937)— 106 Rehearing—motion for leave to file and application for stay of judgment in District Court, following denial of certiorari, granted (No. 65) 126,128 Motion to extend time for filing rehearing to next term of Court denied (Nos. 614, 899). See also No. 52 (p. 251) where application to file rehearing or in alternative to postpone action to next term was denied 236,240,248 Order suspending call of docket 212 Order fixing tentative adjournment date 222 Adjournment order 242 Final order 252 U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1939 : MONDAY, OCTOBEK 3, 1938 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Present: The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Brandeis, Mr. Justice Butler, Mr. Justice Stone, Mr. Justice Koberts, Mr. Justice Black, and Mr. Justice Reed. Ellison A. Neel, of Kansas City, Mo. ; Dean D. Sturgis, of Union- town, Pa.; William Brown Higbee, of Uniontown, Pa.; Donald Mestrezat Higbee, of Connellsville, Pa. Henry Silverman, of New ; York City; Walter M. Andrew, of New York City; Clifford A. Taney, Jr., of Minneapolis, Minn.; J. Lloyd Schaffer, of Baltimore, Md.; Robert W. Lewis, of Worcester, Mass.; John B. Baratta, of Atlantic City, N. J.; J. J. Speight, of Dothan, Ala.; Andrew B. Crummy, of Newark, N. J.; John A. Matthews, of Newark, N. J.; French B. Loveland, of Ocean City, N. J. ; John T. Houser, of Long Beach, Calif. ; Atwood Wolf, of Jersey City, N. J. Henry Jacob- C. ; sen, Jr., of San Francisco, Calif.; Robert S. Keebler, of Memphis^ Tenn. ; John Palermo, of Cleveland, Ohio; Charles L. Anderson, of Logansport, Ind. ; J. Arthur Moran, of Delavan, Wis. ; H. Donald Kistler, of Washington, D. C. ; Claire Woodworth Hardy, of Chicago, 111.; Walter T. Fahy, of Philadelphia, Pa.; William B. Layton, of Portland, Oreg. ; Horace B. Sessions, of Ballinger, Tex.; Ellis L. Quiett, Jr., of Tulsa, Okla.; Jerome Goldman, of Cincinnati, Ohio; Carl E. Ring, of New York City ; Chas. C. Goldman, of Cleveland^ Ohio ; and Irving F. Goodfriend, of New York City, were admitted to practice. The Chief Justice said "Since our last session, we have suffered an irreparable loss in the death of our brother. Justice Cardozo. At a time when he should have enjoyed the full exercise of his remarkable powers he was fatally stricken and we are inexpressibly saddened by this tragic termination of his judicial service and the breaking of our cherished ties of personal association. Admitted to the Bar of New York at the age of twenty-one, Benjamin Nathan Cardozo rapidly won the esteem of lawyers and judges and his special qualifications for judicial work were early recognized. He was elected a Justice of the Supreme Court of New York in 1913 and was almost at once designated for service on the Court of Appeals of that State. This was followed in a few years by his election as Associate Judge of that Court and 99087—38—1 ; MONDAY, OCTOBER 3, 19 3 8 2 in 1926 he was made Chief Judge. On the retirement of Mr. Justice Holmes, and in response to a widespread appreciation of the fitness of the succession, Judge Cardozo was appointed Associate Justice of this Court in February, 1932. His service on the Bench thus spanned nearly twenty-five years, and his contributions to the development of our jurisprudence made his judicial career one of the most illustrious in American annals. His erudition, acumen, and technical skill, com- bined with a philosophic outlook and a passion for justice, made him an ideal Judge, and the wide range of his cultural interests, his modesty and personal charm, made fellowship with him a most precious privilege. With deep sorrow at our loss, we turn to our work with a fresh inspiration as w^e contemplate his devotion to the highest standards of the Bench. At an appropriate time, the Court will receive the resolutions of the Bar in tribute to his memory." No. 1, original. October Term, 1937. State of Georgia, complain- ant, V. Tennessee Copper Company et al. Supplemental return to the rule to show cause presented. No. 2, original. State of Wisconsin et al., complainants, v. State of Illinois et al. No. 3, original. State of Michigan et al., complainants, v. State of Illinois et al. ; and No. 4, original. State of New York et al., complainants, v. State of Illinois et al. Report of defendant, Sanitary District of Chicago, dated July 1, 1938, presented. No. 8, original. State of Nebraska, complainant, v. State of Wy- oming et al. Petition of intervention of the United States and answers of the several States presented. No. 13, original. State of California, complainant, v. Murray W. Latimer et al. Motion to dismiss and answer of the defendants presented. No. 594, October Term, 1937. Calmar Steamship Corporation, petitioner, v. Charles W. Taylor. Motion to retax costs submitted by Mr. Howard M. Long and Mr.
Recommended publications
  • Law Review Scholarship in the Eyes of the Twenty-First Century Supreme Court Justices: an Empirical Analysis

    Law Review Scholarship in the Eyes of the Twenty-First Century Supreme Court Justices: an Empirical Analysis

    2012] APPENDIX TO 4 DREXEL L. REV. 399 A-1 LAW REVIEW SCHOLARSHIP IN THE EYES OF THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY SUPREME COURT JUSTICES: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS Brent E. Newton APPENDIX: OPINIONS ISSUED DURING 2001-11, IN WHICH ONE OR MORE JUSTICES CITED AT LEAST ONE LAW REVIEW ARTICLE 1. Solid Waste Agency of N. Cook Cnty. v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng‘rs, 531 U.S. 159 (2001). Id. at 177 (Stevens, J., dissenting) (citing Sam Kalen, Commerce to Conservation: The Call for a National Water Policy and the Evolution of Federal Jurisdiction Over Wetlands, 69 N.D. L. REV. 873 (1993)). Author: Associate, Van Ness, Feldman & Curtis Law Review Ranking: 454 Id. at 178 n.4 (Stevens, J., dissenting) (citing Garrett Power, The Fox in the Chicken Coop: The Regulatory Program of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 63 VA. L. REV. 503 (1977)). Author: Professor of Law, University of Maryland School of Law Law Review Ranking: 6 Id. at 195–96 (Stevens, J., dissenting) (citing Richard L. Revesz, Rehabilitating Interstate Competition: Rethinking the ―Race-to-the-Bottom‖ Rationale for Federal Environmental Regulation, 67 N.Y.U. L. REV. 1210 (1992)). Author: Professor of Law, New York University Law Review Ranking: 5 2. Glover v. United States, 531 U.S. 198 (2001). No citations 3. Gitlitz v. Comm‘r of Internal Revenue, 531 U.S. 206 (2001). Id. at 221 (Breyer, J., dissenting) (citing James F. Loebl, Does the Excluded COD Income of an Insolvent S Corporation Increase the Basis of the Shareholders‘ Stock?, 52 U.
  • The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) Analyst: C

    The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) Analyst: C

    St. John’s University Undergraduate Student Managed Investment Fund Presents: The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) Analyst: Christopher Inderjit ([email protected]) Teng-Yi (Jason) Huang ([email protected]) Kreshnik N. Sadiku ([email protected]) Alexis Miranda ([email protected]) Recommendations: Buy 150 shares (Limit Order @ $215.00) Share Data: Fundamentals: Price (5/3/07): $221.56 P/E (11/30/06): 9.893 Shares outstanding: 408.47 Forward P/E, 2007 (E): 10.68 Market Cap: 90.50B Diluted EPS, 2006: 19.69 Beta: 1.2307 Diluted EPS, 2007 (E): 29.98 52 Week High: $226.61 Dividend Yield: .63% 52 Week Low: $136.79 Last Dividend: (4/30/07) $0 .35 Corporate credit rating S&P Short-term Debt: A-1+ Long-term Debt: AA- Subordinate Debt: A+ Preferred Securities: A 1 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY After conducting an analysis on Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. financial statements, business operations and business environment as a whole, we recommend that 200 shares be added to the Student Managed Investment Fund portfolio. We based this decision on a number of factors: Increasing corporate activity that will lead to a surge in mergers and acquisitions activities. An increase in investment banking services for established companies and companies looking to issue an initial public offering. Goldman Sachs has established itself as a leader in the investment banking and securities brokerage industry and has shown that it will continue to grow due to the expansion of global equity markets and the need for new sources of financing for firms considering to buy an interest in other companies or acquire target companies.
  • The Bar of Rye Township, Westchester County, New York : an Historical and Biographical Record, 1660-1918

    The Bar of Rye Township, Westchester County, New York : an Historical and Biographical Record, 1660-1918

    i Class JHlS ^ Book_t~Bii5_W_6 Edition limited to two hundred and fifty numbered copies, of which this is number .\ — The Bar of Rye Township Westchester County New York An Historical and Biographical Record 1660-1918 Arthur Russell Wilcox " There is properly no history, only biography." Emerson 8 Copyright, 191 BY ARTHUR R. WILCOX 2^ / i-o Ubc "ftnicftctbocftcr press, tKz\o aoch TO MY MOTHER THIS VOLUME IS LOVINGLY AND .VFFECTIONATELY INSCRIBED — " Discourage litigation. Persuade your neighbors to compromise whenever you can. Point out to them how the nominal winner is often a real loser—in fees, expenses and waste of time. As a peacemaker, the lawyer has a superior opportunity of being a good man. Never stir up litigation. A worse man can scarcely be found than one who does this. Who can be more nearly a fiend than he who habitually overhauls the register of deeds in search of defects in titles, whereupon to stir up strife and put money in his pocket? A moral tone ought to be enforced in the profession which would drive such men out of it." Lincoln. Foreword This work, undertaken chiefly as a diversion, soon became a considerable task, but none the less a pleasant one. It is something which should have been done long since. The eminence of some of Rye's lawyers fully justifies it. It is far from complete. Indeed, at this late day it could not be otherwise; records have disappeared, recollections have become dim, and avenues of investigation are closed. Some names, perhaps, have been rescued from oblivion.
  • How Goldman Sachs Turned the Great Recession Into Competitive Advantage Using Strategic Management

    How Goldman Sachs Turned the Great Recession Into Competitive Advantage Using Strategic Management

    How Goldman Sachs Turned the Great Recession into Competitive Advantage Using Strategic Management Mine Doyran The City University of New York Abstract What are the strategic questions confronting Goldman Sachs in the wake of the Great Recession? Goldman Sachs has been considered the most prestigious investment banking firm on Wall Street. Since September 2008, Goldman operates as a bank holding company and financial holding company regulated by the Federal Reserve. It gives advice on how to achieve long-term financial goals in times of both prosperity and crisis. This case reveals how Goldman Sachs became the quintessential global firm for the current period, which combines both growth and weaknesses. It further argues that Goldman Sachs has adopted innovative strategies one step ahead of its competitors, thus surviving the worst of times and redefining the traditional investment banking field. Background Founded in 1869, Goldman Sachs has been considered the most prestigious investment banking firm on Wall Street. Its clients include both public and private institutions seeking funding for expansion to meet the needs of their clients and advice on how to achieve long-term financial goals in times of both prosperity and crisis. Indeed, Goldman would be the quintessential firm for the current period, which combines both growth and weakness. Currently, Goldman Sachs operates as bank holding company and a financial holding company. It is regulated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. It has an American depository institution subsidiary, Goldman Sachs Bank USA, which is a “New York State-chartered bank.”1 The business of investment firm includes help in planning corporate mergers, Rutgers Business Review Vol.
  • “Al” Alford State Historian

    “Al” Alford State Historian

    BY: Garnel E. “Al” Alford State Historian INTRODUCTION The American Legion is a patriotic, nonmilitary, nonpartisan organization to which all of those who served honorably in the Armed Forces of the United States of America during World War I, World War II, the Korean War, Vietnam War, Lebanon/Grenada, Panama and The Persian Gulf Wars from August 2, 1990 to the cessation of hostilities as determined by the U.S. Government, are eligible for membership. This Organization thrives today by the efforts put forth by a group of officers who served in the American Expeditionary Forces in France in World War II, who are credited with planning the Legion, The American Expeditionary Forces Headquarters asked these officers to ideas on how to improve troop morale. One officer, Lieutenant Colonel Theodore Roosevelt, Jr., proposed an organization of veterans. In February 1919, this group formed a temporary committee and selected several hundred officers who had the confidence and respect of the whole Army. The American Legion was born at a caucus of the American Expeditionary Force (A.E.F.) in Paris, France. This caucus was the result of a proposal by Lieutenant Colonel Theodore Roosevelt, Jr., to a group of representatives of the A.E.F. division and service units. Roosevelt’s vision resulted in the founding Paris caucus of March 15-17, 1919, and subsequent organizational caucus held May 8-10, 1919, in Saint Louis, Missouri. His unwavering service during these vital times won him the affectionate title, “Father of The American Legion.” As the weary, homesick delegates assembled for the first Paris caucus, they brought with them the raw materials with which to build an association of veterans whose primary 2 devotion was to God and Country.
  • Office of Solicitor General

    Office of Solicitor General

    THE JOURNAL OF APPELLATE PRACTICE AND PROCESS THE OFFICE OF SOLICITOR GENERAL PREFACE If any legal position warrants the appellation, "the appellate lawyer's lawyer," it is that of Solicitor General. Seth Waxman, himself a former Solicitor General, has pointed out that "the office of the Solicitor General of the United States is a wonderful and unique creation,"' noting that only the holder of that office, among all the officers of the federal government, is required by statute to be "learned in the law." 2 President after president has complied with that instruction: The list of Solicitors General that follows this preface includes the names of some of this country's most distinguished lawyers. There may even be those who think of the Solicitors General as a corps of immortals, for as Waxman discovered, "[s]ome 60 years ago, a letter found its way into the United States mail addressed simply 'The Celestial General, Washington, D.C." 3 The inadequacy of the address notwithstanding, the Post Office "apparently had no trouble discerning to whom it should be delivered. It went to Robert H. 1. Seth P. Waxman, Speech, Presenting the Case of the United States As It Should Be: The Solicitor General in Historical Context (address to the Supreme Court Historical Society, Washington, June 1, 1998) at I (available at <http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/about osg/sgarticle.html>). 2. Id. 3. Id. THE JOURNAL OF APPELLATE PRACTICE AND PROCESS Vol. 3, No. 2 (Fall 2001) THE JOURNAL OF APPELLATE PRACTICE AND PROCESS Jackson, then Solicitor General of the United States." 4 Waxman is quick to point out that neither he nor any of his predecessors had "pretensions of other-worldliness," but he does acknowledge that they "have all been fortunate to have been able to serve in what Thurgood Marshall called 'the best job I've ever had." We in the law can see that it is indeed a special job, for the Solicitor General is the only lawyer who, as Francis Biddle put it, "has no master to serve except his country." 6 The responsibilities of the job are great, but so are the rewards.
  • The Rededication of Court of Appeals Hall

    The Rededication of Court of Appeals Hall

    The Rededication of the Court of Appeals "The Rededication of the Court of Appeals" The Rededication of COURT OF APPEALS HALL Albany, New York October Fifth, 1959 The Historical Society of the Courts of the State of New York New York State Judicial Institute 84 North Broadway, White Plains, NY 10603 phone: (914) 682-3222 The Rededication of the Court of Appeals "The Rededication of the Court of Appeals" IN THE RESTORATION and modernization of Court of Appeals Hall, formerly the old State Hall, erected in 1842, and occupied by the Court since January 8, 1917, we have had the utmost co-operation and the devoted services of many persons in public and private life. We are especially grateful to Governor Nelson A. Rockefeller, former Governor Averell Harriman, the members of our State Legislature, the Attorney General, the State Comptroller, the Directors of the Budget, the Superintendents of Public Works and their staffs, the State Architect, the Appellate Division of the Third Department, the Mayor of Albany and his Commissioners, the consulting architects, the general contractor, the subcontractors, and the many skilled craftsmen and co-workers. The restoration of this 117 year old building to its original architectural beauty, and its modernization to cope with the business of the Court, will aid in serving the cause of justice for many years, and Court of Appeals Hall will be a monument to which not only the People of Albany but those of our Empire State may point with pride. CHIEF JUDGE The Rededication of the Court of Appeals "The Rededication of the Court of Appeals" COURT OF APPEALS HALL TODAY The Rededication of the Court of Appeals "The Rededication of the Court of Appeals" Rededication Presiding HON.
  • Risk Management 15.433 Financial Markets November 7 & 9, 2017

    Risk Management 15.433 Financial Markets November 7 & 9, 2017

    15.433 Financial Markets Risk Management Risk Management 15.433 Financial Markets November 7 & 9, 2017 Fall 2017 Jun Pan, MIT Sloan –1– 15.433 Financial Markets Risk Management Outline for Today Why Risk Management? • Market Risk Measurement. • Regulatory Requirements. • Fall 2017 Jun Pan, MIT Sloan –2– 15.433 Financial Markets Risk Management The Economics of Risk Management In perfect capital markets, adding or subtracting financial risk has no • impact on the market value of a publicly traded corporation or on the welfare of its shareholders. Capital markets are not perfect. Market imperfections underlie significant • benefits to bearing and controlling financial risks. Capital — a Scarce Resource: • – If new capital could be obtained in perfect financial markets, we would expect a financial firm to raise capital as necessary to avoid the costs of financial distress. – In such a setting, purely financial risk would have a relatively small impact, and risk management would likewise be less important. – In practice, however, capital is a scarce resource, especially when it is most needed. Fall 2017 Jun Pan, MIT Sloan –3– 15.433 Financial Markets Risk Management The Leverage of Financial Firms Compared with other types of corporations, financial firms have relatively • liquid balance sheets, made up largely of financial positions. This relative liquidity allows a typical financial firm to operate with a high • degree of leverage. For example, major broker-dealers regulated by SEC frequently have a • level of accounting capital that is close to the regulatory minimum of 8% of accounting assets, implying a leverage ratio on the order of 12-to-1.
  • Introduction to the Ninth Annual Chief Judge Lawrence H

    Introduction to the Ninth Annual Chief Judge Lawrence H

    BONVENTRE 11/18/2015 3:53 PM INTRODUCTION TO THE NINTH ANNUAL CHIEF JUDGE LAWRENCE H. COOKE SYMPOSIUM, HIGH COURTS, CENTER SEAT: CHIEF JUSTICES AT ALBANY LAW SCHOOL; AND “THE LIPPMAN TOP TEN” Vincent Martin Bonventre* Welcome to the Chief Judge Cooke Symposium. Named after Lawrence H. Cooke, this symposium has previously brought some of the nation’s most preeminent jurists to Albany Law School, such as: Chief Justice Margaret Marshall of Massachusetts,1 Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson of Wisconsin,2 Chief Justice Christine Durham of Utah,3 Chief Justice Marsha Ternus of Iowa,4 and Chief Judge Judith Kaye of New York.5 We have even invited a few men: Chief Justice Jim Hannah of Arkansas,6 Justice Jack Landau of Oregon,7 and of course, Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman of New York.8 Additionally, both Chief Judge Kaye9 and Chief Judge Lippman10 have each brought the entire Court of Appeals with them to participate in previous Cooke symposia. The last time the Judges of the court discussed “The Untold Secrets of Eagle Street”—including the handshake. We know there’s a handshake; we just don’t know * Editor, State Constitutional Commentary, Faculty Advisor, Albany Law Review; Ph.D., M.A.P.A., University of Virginia; J.D., Brooklyn Law School; B.S., Union College. Professor of Law, Albany Law School; Blog: New York Court Watcher. 1 Symposium, Great Women, Great Chiefs, 74 ALB. L. REV. 1595 (2010/2011). 2 Symposium, The State of State Courts, 75 ALB. L. REV. 1703 (2011/2012). 3 Id. 4 Great Women, Great Chiefs, supra note 1.
  • Imprisoning the Innocent: the "Knowledge of Law" Fiction

    Imprisoning the Innocent: the "Knowledge of Law" Fiction

    Liberty University Law Review Volume 12 Issue 2 Article 6 January 2018 Imprisoning the Innocent: The "Knowledge of Law" Fiction Phillip D. Kline Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lu_law_review Recommended Citation Kline, Phillip D. (2018) "Imprisoning the Innocent: The "Knowledge of Law" Fiction," Liberty University Law Review: Vol. 12 : Iss. 2 , Article 6. Available at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lu_law_review/vol12/iss2/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Liberty University School of Law at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Liberty University Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE IMPRISONING THE INNOCENT: THE “KNOWLEDGE OF LAW” FICTION Phillip D. Kline† I. THE PRESENT PROBLEM OF PUNISHING THE MORALLY INNOCENT Disorientation alarmed him. Ocie Mills was accustomed to deciding his direction and defining his purpose. But today, Monday, May 15, 1989, Ocie and his son Cary were reporting to prison, adjudged felons by the country they loved.1 *** Tension between individual liberty and the state, and the inherent metaphysical mysteries of that tension,2 are at least as old as humankind’s earliest discovered written stories. In The Epic of Gilgamesh, written from circa. 2150-1400 BC and considered the most ancient example of literature, † B.A. Central Missouri State University (1982); J.D., University of Kansas (1987). Phill Kline is an Associate Professor at Liberty University School of Law where he teaches Evidence, Bioethics and Law and Trial Practice. He served as a member of the Kansas House of Representatives (1993-2001), Kansas Attorney General (2003-2007) and Johnson County District Attorney (2007-2009).
  • 1930 Journal

    1930 Journal

    ; ; MONDAY, OCTOBER 6, 19 3 0 -f^^ 1 SUPEEME COURT OE THE UisTITED STATES Present: The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Holmes, Mr. Justice Van Devanter, Mr. Justice McReynolds, Mr. Justice Brandeis, Mr. Jus- tice Sutherland, Mr. Justice Butler, Mr. Justice Stone, and Mr. Justice Roberts. Louis Charney Friedman, of Paterson, N. J.; A. F. Kingdon, of Bluefield, W. Va. ; Edward H. Dell, of Middletown, Ohio ; Francis P. Farrell, of New York City; John E. Snyder, of Hershey, Pa.; Francis E. Delamore, of Little Rock, Ark.; William R. Carlisle, of New York City; William Geo. Junge, of Los Angeles, Calif.; Francis Harold Uriell, of Chicago, 111.; John Butera, of Dallas, Tex.; Alean Brisley Clutts, of Detroit, Mich.; Cornelius B. Comegys, of Scranton, Pa.; Walter J. Rosston, of New York City; John A. Coleman, of Los Angeles, Calif. Harry F. Brown, of Guthrie, Okla. ; Wm. W. Montgomery, Jr., of Philadelphia, Pa.; Joe E. Daniels, of New York City; Winthrop Wadleigh, of Milford, N. H.; Ernest C. Griffith, of Los Angeles, Calif. ; and K. Berry Peterson, of Phoenix, Ariz., were admitted to practice. No. 380* R. D. Spicer et al., petitioners, v. The United States of America No. 381. G. C. Stephens, petitioner, v. The United States of America; and No. 382. B. M. Wotkyns, petitioner, v. The United States of America. Leave granted the respondent to file brief on or before October 20, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General Thacher for the respondent. No. 5. Indian Motocycle Company v. The United States of Amer- ica. Joint motion to amend certificate submitted by Mr.
  • The Formation of Italian-American Diasporic Space: an Account of the Emergence of an Italian-American Community in Philadelphia Hechen Liu1,A

    The Formation of Italian-American Diasporic Space: an Account of the Emergence of an Italian-American Community in Philadelphia Hechen Liu1,A

    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 466 Proceedings of the 2020 4th International Seminar on Education, Management and Social Sciences (ISEMSS 2020) The Formation of Italian-American Diasporic Space: An Account of the Emergence of An Italian-American Community in Philadelphia Hechen Liu1,a College of Arts and Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63105, USA *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT In this paper, the author seeks to outline and theorize the emergence and formation of a diasporic Italian American identity. The researcher focuses on historical concerns as well as contemporary dynamics but is principally interested in the creation of an identity that is sustained even today while being internally diverse and continually subject to change. The author will illustrate this, concerning the Italian-American community in Philadelphia. The paper will be concluded with how a diasporic space is formed and how it mutually interacts with the formation of a diasporic identity. Moreover, the paper will explain how the process of formation of collective identification, or nationality, is imagined and re-imagined in an Italian-American community in South Philadelphia. Keywords: Diasporic space, Imagined community, Nationality, Italian-American community, South Philadelphia corresponded with a significant change in the regional origin of the newcomers of Italian background. The early 1. INTRODUCTION immigration before the 1880s was commonly comprised of people from northern Italy, especially places like Liguria As the reference to a real or imagined homeland suggest, we and Piedmont [8]. Later, as records show, the northerners need to grasp that the Italian presence in the US is not just were increasingly accompanied by greater numbers of about continuity with what came before, but also about how southerners migrating to the United States [6].