DOCSLIB.ORG

Cover Women in Prison

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cover Women in Prison SLC Special Series Report Female Offenders: Special Needs and Southern State Challenges Prepared by Todd Alan Edwards, Regional Representative Southern Legislative Conference of The Council of State Governments Female Offenders: Special Needs and Southern State Challenges A Special Series Report of the Southern Legislative Conference © Copyright August 2000 Southern Office The Council of State Governments 3355 Lenox Road, N.E. Suite 1050 Atlanta, Georgia 30326 404/266-1271 Colleen Cousineau, Executive Director Acknowledgments The Human Services and Public Safety Committee of the Southern Legislative Conference, chaired by Senator Yvonne B. Miller, Virginia, has long focused on key correctional issues affecting Southern states. This Special Series Report examines the recent growth in the female inmate population, the unique characteristics and needs of women offenders, and the challenges states face in addressing those needs through their corrections systems. A special thanks to all those whose research has been incorporated in this report, and to the corrections administrators and staff across the South who assisted in gathering and verifying the information contained here. Their prior research and vital assistance provides an invaluable foundation on which this report is based. This report was prepared by Todd Edwards, Regional Representative for the Southern Legislative Conference of The Council of State Governments, under the Chairmanship of Speaker Jody Richards, Kentucky. Any concerns or comments may be addressed directly to Mr. Edwards via e-mail at [email protected]. Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 SECTION 1: The Female Offender Population: Trends, Offenses and Correctional Facilities .................................................................................. 3 The Numbers.................................................................................................................................. 3 Women Under State and Federal Correctional Supervision, 1980-1998 .................................. 3 Gender Comparisons ................................................................................................................. 5 Proportionately Speaking .......................................................................................................... 5 Other Correctional Supervision................................................................................................. 7 Womens Offenses: The War on Drugs ...................................................................... 8 Womens Correctional Facilities and Placement ................................................................... 10 Brief History of Women’s Prisons in America ....................................................................... 10 SLC State-Operated Women’s Prisons ................................................................................... 10 Prison Populations and Design Capacity ................................................................................ 11 Classification and Placement .................................................................................................. 13 SECTION 2: Womens Needs, Corrections Policies and Programs ................................... 14 Health Care .................................................................................................................................. 14 Access to Medical Care and Staff ........................................................................................... 14 Medical Co-Payments .............................................................................................................15 Substance Abuse ..................................................................................................................... 15 Mental Health .......................................................................................................................... 17 HIV/AIDS ............................................................................................................................... 18 Summary of Health Care Issues .............................................................................................. 19 Education, Vocational Training and Work Programs ............................................................ 20 Education ................................................................................................................................. 20 Vocational Training ................................................................................................................ 21 Prison Industry ........................................................................................................................ 21 Work ........................................................................................................................................ 22 Family Matters ............................................................................................................................. 23 Visitation ................................................................................................................................. 23 Pregnancy ................................................................................................................................ 25 Childbirth ................................................................................................................................ 25 Child Custody .......................................................................................................................... 26 Bonding and On-Site Care ...................................................................................................... 26 Placement of Newborns .......................................................................................................... 27 Parenting.................................................................................................................................. 28 Abuse and Victimization .........................................................................................................29 Addressing Abuse ................................................................................................................... 29 Staffing Issues and Privacy Concerns ...................................................................................... 31 Gender-Specific Staff Training ............................................................................................... 31 Custodial Sexual Misconduct .................................................................................................. 31 Other Privacy Restrictions ......................................................................................................32 SECTION 3: Facilities, Policies, Programs and Procedures: Southern State Comparisons ............................................................................................. 34 The Survey .................................................................................................................................... 34 Alabama .................................................................................................................................. 35 Arkansas .................................................................................................................................. 37 Florida ..................................................................................................................................... 39 Georgia .................................................................................................................................... 42 Kentucky ................................................................................................................................. 44 Louisiana ................................................................................................................................. 46 Maryland ................................................................................................................................. 48 Mississippi ............................................................................................................................... 51 Missouri ................................................................................................................................... 53 North Carolina ......................................................................................................................... 56 Oklahoma ................................................................................................................................ 59 South Carolina ......................................................................................................................... 62 Tennessee ................................................................................................................................ 65 Texas ...................................................................................................................................... 68 Virginia.................................................................................................................................... 72 West Virginia .......................................................................................................................... 75 Report Summary: State Challenges, Planning and Future
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Comparative Study of Female Sex Offenders and Female Offenders
    A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FEMALE SEX OFFENDERS AND FEMALE OFFENDERS: EXPLORING ISSUES OF PERSONALITY, TRAUMA, AND COGNITIVE DISTORTIONS by SUSAN McCARTHY STRICKLAND (Under the Direction of Kevin DeWeaver) ABSTRACT Although crime rates are declining in recent years, crime rates for women are increasing. Incarceration rates have increased for women by 121% in the last 12 years (compared to an 84% rise for men) (Sacks, 2004). In comparison to the general population, female offenders tend to have higher levels of chemical dependency, personality disorders, childhood trauma histories, including sexual abuse (DOJ, 1992; 1994). In the last 10 years, sexual crime committed by women has been identified and adjudicated at higher frequencies. Few studies have investigated the characteristics of female sex offenders, factors and/or causes of female deviance, and how best to rehabilitate them. Research to date has been descriptive in nature, with few comparison studies. Since women share the similar socialization, sexual development, trauma histories, and gender-specific issues, the pathway to female sexual deviance is unclear. This study used a correlational design, comparing two independent groups. Three valid and reliable test instruments, the Multiphasic Sex Inventory – II (female version) (MSI-II), the Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory – 3 (SASSI-3), and the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), were used to identify differences between female sex offenders and other female offenders in the areas of personality disorders, chemical dependency, childhood trauma, sexual trauma, emotional neediness, cognitive distortions, and social competence. A sample of 130 incarcerated females, 60 sex offenders, and 70 non-sexual offenders, was used. Results indicate few differences exist between female sex offenders and female non-sex offenders.
    [Show full text]
  • California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
    California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Institution abbreviation, City, State and zip code. Prison Name Abbreviation City State Zip Avenal State Prison ASP Avenal CA 93204 California City Correctional Center CAC California City CA 93505 California State Prison, Calipatria CAL Calipatria CA 92233 California Correctional Center CCC Susanville CA 96130 California Correctional Institution CCI Tehachapi CA 93561 Centinela State Prison CEN Imperial CA 92251 Central California Women’s Facility CCWF Chowchilla CA 93610 California Health Care Facility CHCF Stockton CA 95215 California Institution for Men CIM Chino CA 91710 California Institution for Women CIW Corona CA 92878 California Men's Colony CMC San Luis Obispo CA 93409 California Medical Facility CMF Vacaville CA 95696 California State Prison, Corcoran COR Corcoran CA 93212 California Rehabilitation Center CRC Norco CA 92860 Correctional Training Facility CTF Soledad CA 93960 Chuckawalla Valley State Prison CVSP Blythe CA 92225 Deuel Vocational Institute DVI Tracy CA 95376 Folsom State Prison FSP Represa CA 95671 High Desert State Prison HDSP Susanville CA 96127 Ironwood State Prison ISP Blythe CA 92225 Kern Valley State Prison KVSP Delano CA 93216 California State Prison, Lancaster LAC Lancaster CA 93536 Mule Creek State Prison MCSP Ione CA 95640 North Kern State Prison NKSP Delano CA 93215 Pelican Bay State Prison PBSP Crescent City CA 95531 Pleasant Valley State Prison PVSP Coalinga CA 93210 RJ Donovan Correctional Facility RJD San Diego CA 92179 California State Prison, Sacramento SAC Represa CA 95671 Substance Abuse Treatment Facility SATF Corcoran CA 93212 Sierra Conservation Center SCC Jamestown CA 95327 California State Prison, Solano SOL Vacaville CA 95696 San Quentin SQ San Quentin CA 94964 Salinas Valley State Prison SVSP Soledad CA 93960 Valley State Prison VSP Chowchilla CA 93610 Wasco State Prison WSP Wasco CA 93280 N.A.
    [Show full text]
  • State of California California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Adult Programs
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION ADULT PROGRAMS Annual Report Division of Addiction and Recovery Services June 2009 MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Division of Addiction and Recovery Services (DARS) is to provide evidence-based substance use disorder treatment services to California’s inmates and parolees. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION ADULT PROGRAMS DIVISION OF ADDICTION AND RECOVERY SERVICES MATTHEW L. CATE SECRETARY KATHRYN P. JETT UNDERSECRETARY, ADULT PROGRAMS C. ELIZABETH SIGGINS CHIEF DEPUTY SECRETARY (Acting), ADULT PROGRAMS THOMAS F. POWERS DIRECTOR DIVISION OF ADDICTION AND RECOVERY SERVICES SHERRI L. GAUGER DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIVISION OF ADDICTION AND RECOVERY SERVICES ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This report was prepared by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations’ (CDCR) Division of Addiction and Recovery Services’ (DARS) Data Analysis and Evaluation Unit (DAEU) with assistance from Steven Chapman, Ph.D., Assistant Secretary, Office of Research. It provides an initial summary of performance indicators, demographics and background information on the DARS Substance Abuse Treatment Programs. The information presented in this report is designed to assist the treatment programs and institutional staff in assessing progress, identifying barriers and weaknesses to effective programming, and analyzing trends, while establishing baseline points to measure outcomes. Under the direction of Bill Whitney, Staff Services Manager II; Gerald Martin, Staff Services Manager I; Sheeva Sabati, Research Analyst II; Ruben Mejia, Research Program Specialist; Krista Christian, Research Program Specialist, conducted extensive research and analysis for this report. Peggy Bengs, Information Officer II and Norma Pate, Special Assistant to the Deputy Director, DARS provided editorial contributions. NOTE: In 2007, DARS designed the Offender Substance Abuse Treatment Database to monitor and evaluate programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory of Programs Serving Families of Adult Offenders National Institute of Corrections
    U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Corrections 11/03 Directory of Programs Serving Families of Adult Offenders National Institute of Corrections Morris L. Thigpen, Director George M. Keiser, Chief Community Corrections Division Kenneth S. Carpenter, Project Manager Directory of Programs Serving Families of Adult Offenders James W. Mustin Editor Stephanie Halfacre Associate Editor August 1998 This project was supported by the National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. ii Introduction This directory was prepared by the Family and Corrections Network to update the Directory of Programs Serving Families of Adult Offenders dated October 1995. This revised directory lists programs in the United States and Canada offering services specifically for families of adult offenders. Entries were identified by sending survey forms to directors of departments of corrections in the United States and Canada, to programs listed in the 1995 directory, and to other programs known to the Family and Corrections Network. Questions about this Directory should be addressed to Jim Mustin, 32 Oak Grove Road, Palmyra, VA 22963. Reproduction and distribution of this document are permitted and encouraged. The document can be downloaded from the Internet at the NIC Information Center website—www.nicic.org. For a single printed copy of the document, contact the NIC Information Center at 800-877-1461 or via the Internet at [email protected]. iii Contents Programs in the United States Alabama ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Accountability Audit Review of Audits of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation 2000–2006
    ACCOUNTABILITY AUDIT REVIEW OF AUDITS OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION 2000–2006 OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL MATTHEW L. CATE INSPECTOR GENERAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA APRIL 2008 ACCOUNTABILITY AUDIT REVIEW OF AUDITS OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION 2000–2006 OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL MATTHEW L. CATE INSPECTOR GENERAL STATE OF CALIFORNIA APRIL 2008 P.O. Box 348780, Sacramento, CA 95834-8780 (916) 830-3600 fax: (916) 928-5974 [email protected] Copies of this publication may be downloaded from the Office of the Inspector General’s Web site: www.oig.ca.gov Contents Executive Summary....................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 8 Background ......................................................................................................................... 8 Objectives, Scope, and Methodology ............................................................................... 10 Chapter 1: Initial Follow-up Results for Four Reports Issued in 2005 and 2006 ............................................. 14 Special Review into the Shooting of Inmate Daniel Provencio......................................... 18 Improper Housing of Maximum Custody Inmates at California State Prison Reception Centers..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE DOC EAGLE Summer, 2003 “Soaring to Greater Heights of Excellence”
    Volume 2, Issue 1 THE DOC EAGLE Summer, 2003 “Soaring to Greater Heights of Excellence” Message From the Acting Commissioner... Georgia, its taxpayers, and its state agencies are facing a difficult time due to the economy. Our de- partment, in particular, faces the challenges of providing public safety by ensuring that we do not let even one of the 47,000 prisoners in our custody escape and that we provide effective supervision to the 125,000 probationers on our caseloads. We are doing this in Fiscal Year 2004 with $41 million less than we had last year. We can only perform our important mission, even in the best of times, with good leadership. Leadership is even more important during difficult times. And the kind of leadership we need must exist all the way from the commissioner’s office to the folks doing the front line work in our facilities and on the street. During my military duty in Washington, D.C., this summer, I have had the opportunity to visit some historic sites and many of the memorials in this city, from Mt. Vernon to the Lincoln Memorial. They Joe Ferrero have all reminded me of the leadership that our Founders and those who followed brought to our Acting Commissioner country during its difficult times. I have also had the opportunity to study while stationed here. Dur- ing my studies, I came across a quote from Colonel John Boyd, USAF (retired), who said that leader- ship is “the art of inspiring people to cooperate and enthusiastically take action toward the achieve- ment of uncommon goals.” (Cont.
    [Show full text]
  • GDC FY2019 Annual Report.Pdf
    GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Fiscal Year 2019 ANNUAL REPORT INDEX Letter from the Commissioner...................................................................... 4 Commissioner's Top 5 Priorities.................................................................. 5 Board of Corrections..................................................................................... 6 GDC Leadership & Organization................................................................. 7 Agency Highlights for Fiscal Year 2019....................................................... 8 Staff First....................................................................................................... 11 Safe & Secure Facilities.................................................................................. 21 Process Improvements.................................................................................. 27 ACA Accreditation........................................................................................ 33 Zero Tolerance............................................................................................... 37 Offender Wellness & Programming.............................................................. 41 Legal Services................................................................................................ 50 Georgia Correctional Industries................................................................... 53 Report designed by: Jessica Eanes MISSION The Georgia Department of Corrections protects the public by operating safe and
    [Show full text]
  • Case 7:08-Tc-05000 Document 2 Filed 01/08/2008 Page 1 of 96
    Case 7:08-tc-05000 Document 2 Filed 01/08/2008 Page 1 of 96 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION ASTANIEL JARVIS MANN, CIVIL ACTION NO. PIP HENG, ELIJAH ADCOCK, RONNY N. ASKEW, RICKIE LEE FOX, JODRPH DANIEL FINCHER, and SHEDRICK D. ROSS, Plaintiffs, Vs. CLASS ACTION COMMISSIONER JAMES DONALD, RICK JACOBS, SARAH DRAPER, DR. SHARON LEWIS, MD., WARDEN HART, DEPUTY WARDEN MCLAUGHLIN, ALBERT JONES, CAPTAIN MORRIS, LT. MAINE, OFFICER POWELL, OFFICER JESSE HOWELL, OFFICER T. BROWN, OFFICER YANCEY, OFFICER CANNON, OFFICER SNAKE, OFFICER SMITH, OFFICER SHANE, OFFICER GRAINGER, OFFICER RADCLIFF, SERGEANT BOND, OFFICER PAGE, OFFICER DANIEL, OFFICER BATES, OFFICER JOHN DOE NO. 1, and OFFICER JOHN DOE NO. 2, Defendants. Case 7:08-tc-05000 Document 2 Filed 01/08/2008 Page 2 of 96 COMPLAINT – CLASS ACTION Plaintiffs, Astaniel Jarvis Mann, (“Mann”), Pip Heng (“Heng”), Elijah Adcock (“Adcock”), Ronnie N. Askew (“Askew”), Ricky Lee Fox (“Fox”), Joseph Daniel Fincher (“Fincher”), and Shedrick D. Ross (“Ross”) file this Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in accordance with FRCP Rule 23, and show the Court as follows: PLAINTIFFS 1. Plaintiffs Mann, Heng, Adcock, Askew, Fox, Fincher, and Ross were incarcerated in the Georgia Department of Corrections and at all times relevant were inmates at the Valdosta State Prison or at Lowndes State Prison in Valdosta, Georgia which is within the Middle District of Georgia. DEFENDANTS 2. Defendant James E. Donald (“ Commissioner Donald”) was at all times relevant and is currently Commissioner of the Georgia Department of Corrections; Defendant Rick Jacobs (“ Jacobs”) was at all times relevant and is currently Director of Special Operations Sections of the Corrections Divisions of the Georgia Department of Corrections; Defendant Sarah Draper (“Draper”) was at all times relevant and currently Director of Internal Case 7:08-tc-05000 Document 2 Filed 01/08/2008 Page 3 of 96 Investigations of the Georgia Department of Corrections; Defendant Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Mental Health Treatment in State Prisons, 2000 by Allen J
    U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report July 2001, NCJ 188215 Mental Health Treatment in State Prisons, 2000 By Allen J. Beck, Ph.D. and Laura M. Maruschak Highlights BJS Statisticians Nearly all State adult confinement facilities screen inmates On June 30, 2000, 1,394 of the for mental health problems or provide treatment Nation’s 1,558 State public and private Percent of facilities Mental health screening and treat- adult correctional facilities reported that Mental Confine- Community- ment services were more frequently they provide mental health services to health policy ment based reported by State confinement facili- their inmates.* Nearly 70% of facilities Any 95% 82% ties (95%) than by community-based housing State prison inmates reported Screen at intake 78 47 Conduct psychiatric facilities (82%). that, as a matter of policy, they screen assessments 79 30 inmates at intake; 65% conduct psychi- Provide 24-hour care 63 20 Community-based facilities, in atric assessments; 51% provide Provide therapy/counseling 84 35 which at least 50% of the inmates 24-hour mental health care; 71% Distribute psychotropic regularly depart unaccompanied, were medications 83 49 less likely to report mental health provide therapy/counseling by trained Assist releasees 72 51 mental health professionals; 73% screening (47%), assessment (30%), distribute psychotropic medications to and therapy/counseling (35%). their inmates; and 66% help released 1 in 10 State inmates receiving psychotropic medications; inmates obtain community mental 1 in 8 in mental health therapy or counseling health services. Percent of inmates On June 30, 2000, an estimated One in every 8 State prisoners was receiving 150,900 State inmates were in mental receiving some mental health therapy Facility Therapy/ Psychotropic health therapy/counseling programs; characteristic counseling medications 114,400 inmates were receiving or counseling services at midyear All 13% 10% psychotropic medications; and 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Pleasant Valley State Prison (PVSP)
    Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) Audit Report Adult Prisons & Jails ☐ Interim ☒ Final Date of Report: February 23, 2019 Auditor Information Name: Amanda Rasmussen Email: [email protected] Company Name: Oregon Department of Corrections Mailing Address: 2575 Center Street NE City, State, Zip: Salem, OR 97301 Telephone: 503-569-8578 Date of Facility Visit: August 7-10, 2018 Agency Information Name of Agency: Governing Authority or Parent Agency (If Applicable): California Department of Corrections & Click or tap here to enter text. Rehabilitation Physical Address: 1515 S Street, Suite 351-N City, State, Zip: Sacramento, CA 95811 Mailing Address: PO Box 924883 City, State, Zip: Sacramento, CA 94283 Telephone: 916-985-2561 Is Agency accredited by any organization? ☒ Yes ☐ No The Agency Is: ☐ Military ☐ Private for Profit ☐ Private not for Profit ☐ Municipal ☐ County ☒ State ☐ Federal Agency mission: We enhance public safety through safe and secure incarceration of offenders, effective parole supervision, and rehabilitative strategies to successfully reintegrate offenders into our communities. Agency Website with PREA Information: https://cdcr.ca.gov/PREA/index.html Agency Chief Executive Officer Name: Ralph Diaz Title: CDCR Secretary Email: [email protected] Telephone: 916-323-6001 PREA Audit Report Page 1 of 97 Pleasant Valley State Prison Agency-Wide PREA Coordinator Name: Shannon Stark Title: Captain, Agency PREA Coordinator Email: [email protected] Telephone: 916-324-6688 PREA Coordinator Reports to: Number
    [Show full text]
  • The Correctional Peace Officers Foundation National Honor Guard
    CPO FAMILY Autumn 2017 A Publication of The CPO Foundation Vol. 27, No. 2 The Correctional Peace Officers Foundation National Honor Guard To see the CPOF National Honor Guard members “up close and personal,” go to pages 24-25. Bravery Above and Beyond the Call of Duty See page 20 for the inspiring stories of these three life-saving Corrections Professionals whose selfless acts of Sgt. Mark Barra bravery “off the job” Calipatria State Prison, CA earned them much- Lt. John Mendiboure Lt. Christopher Gainey deserved recognition at Avenal SP, CA Pender Correctional Project 2000 XXVIII. Institution, NC Inside, starting on page 4: PROJECT 2000 XXVIII ~ June 15-18, 2017, San Francisco, CA 1 Field Representatives CPO FAMILY Jennifer Donaldson Davis Alabama Carolyn Kelley Alabama The Correctional Peace Officers Foundation Ned Entwisle Alaska 1346 N. Market Blvd. • Sacramento, CA 95834 Liz Shaffer-Smith Arizona P. O. Box 348390 • Sacramento, CA 95834-8390 Annie Norman Arkansas 916.928.0061 • 800.800.CPOF Connie Summers California cpof.org Charlie Bennett California Guy Edmonds Colorado Directors of The CPO Foundation Kim Blakley Federal Glenn Mueller Chairman/National Director George Meshko Federal Edgar W. Barcliff, Jr. Vice Chairman/National Director Laura Phillips Federal Don Dease Secretary/National Director John Williams Florida Richard Waldo Treasurer/National Director Donald Almeter Florida Salvador Osuna National Director Jim Freeman Florida Jim Brown National Director Vanessa O’Donnell Georgia Kim Potter-Blair National Director Rose Williams
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Councils 2018.Xlsx
    ADDED ON Last Update: 1/10/2018 State/Country Ad Council/Organization Location Program MOU Alabama Aliceville Federal Correctional Facility Aliceville, Alabama Kairos Women Inside Bibb Correctional Facility Brent, Alabama Kairos Men Inside Added 8.11.15 Decatur Work Release Center Decatur; Alabama Kairos Men Inside Donaldson Correctional Facility (Max/Death Row) Bessemer, Alabama Kairos Men Inside Draper Correctional Facility Elmore, Alabama Kairos Men Inside Elmore Correctional Facility Elmore, Alabama Kairos Men Inside GK Fountain Correctional Facility Atmore, Alabama Kairos Men Inside Hamilton Aged & Infirmed Hamilton, Alabama Kairos Men Inside Holman (Death Row) Correctional Facility Atmore, Alabama Kairos Men Inside Limestone Correctional Facility Harvest, Alabama Kairos Men Inside St. Clair Correctional Facility Springville, Alabama Kairos Men Inside Staton Correctional Facility Elmore, Alabama Kairos Men Inside Talladega Federal Talladega, Alabama Kairos Men Inside Tutwiler Prison for Women Wetumpka, Alabama Kairos Women Inside Was KO Alabama 1.30.17 Kairos Outside North Alabama Calera, Alabama Kairos Outside Added 11.7.16 Kairos Outside South Alabama Southern Alabama Kairos Outside Alaska Hiland Mountain Correction Center (HMCC) Eagle River, Alaska KairosWomen Inside Wildwood Correction Center (WCC) Kenai, Alaska Kairos Men Inside Arizona La Palma Correctional Center Eloy, Arizona Kairos Men Inside Added 9.18.17 Wilmot State Prison Tucson, Arizona Kairos Men Inside Added 5.21.16 Arizona State Prison - Perryville (Lumley Unit)
    [Show full text]