2017 Legislative Scorecard How Do Your State Legislators Score When It Comes to Guaranteeing a Fair and Just State for Lgbtq Coloradans and Their Families?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2017 Legislative Scorecard How Do Your State Legislators Score When It Comes to Guaranteeing a Fair and Just State for Lgbtq Coloradans and Their Families? LGBTQ EQUALITY 2017 LEGISLATIVE SCORECARD HOW DO YOUR STATE LEGISLATORS SCORE WHEN IT COMES TO GUARANTEEING A FAIR AND JUST STATE FOR LGBTQ COLORADANS AND THEIR FAMILIES? ONE COLORADO’S LEGISLATIVE SCORECARD highlights the priorities of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) Coloradans and their families in the 2017 legislative session. In this scorecard, you will find accurate, nonpartisan information on bills related to LGBTQ equality and how each member of the legislature voted on issues that affect Colorado’s LGBTQ community. USE THIS SCORECARD to find out if your elected officials’ votes align with your values of advancing equality for LGBTQ Coloradans. For more information, you can visit WWW.ONE-COLORADO.ORG. During the 2017 legislative session, we saw a number of victories for LGBTQ Coloradans and their families that were the product of successful, bipartisan cooperation. However, other measures that would have dramatically improved the lives of LGBTQ people were defeated—including a ban on the harmful and discredited practice of conversion therapy and a bill to make it less burdensome for transgender Coloradans to update the gender on their birth certificates. We also saw attempts to roll back protections for LGBTQ Coloradans, in the form of religious exemptions proposals, which were fortunately defeated in both chambers of the Colorado Legislature. WERE YOUR LEGISLATORS CHAMPIONS FOR LGBTQ EQUALITY THIS YEAR? Call or email them to thank them. Alternatively, if you aren’t satisfied with how your representatives and senators voted on this year’s scorecard, you can call, email, send a letter, or attend their town hall meetings to let them know how you feel. Between now and the end of the year, One Colorado will be making sure voters across the state know how their legislators voted on LGBTQ equality. If you want to help us hold our elected officials accountable, sign up to volunteer with us at WWW.ONE-COLORADO.ORG/VOLUNTEER. NEED TO FIND OUT WHO YOUR STATE LEGISLATORS ARE? Visit WWW.OPENSTATES.ORG/FIND_YOUR_LEGISLATOR. LGBTQ Equality 2017 Legislative Scorecard 2 WITH THE HELP OF OUR MEMBERS IN 2017, ONE COLORADO: Sent 10,564 letters to legislators Held 350 in-person legislator meetings Made 2,758 calls into legislators offices Generated 133 news stories, on TV and in newspapers across the state, on our priority proposals Brought 96 people to the capitol to testify LGBTQ Equality 2017 Legislative Scorecard 3 RELIGIOUS EXEMPTIONS Over the past three years, there have been numerous efforts across the country to pass religious exemption laws that would allow individuals to claim their religion gives them permission to pick and choose which laws to follow. Religious freedom is important, which is why the First Amendment to our Constitution already protects it, but that freedom does not give anyone the right to harm others. This year, we saw two attempts to roll back protections for LGBTQ Coloradans in the form of vague religious exemption measures. HOUSE BILL 1013 CONCERNING A PERSON’S FREE EXERCISE OF RELIGION This bill would have allowed businesses and individuals to claim that their religion gives them permission to exempt themselves from laws they don’t want to follow. House Bill 1013 was so broadly written that it would create exemptions for virtually anything that a person could contend is part of their religion and make our laws harder to follow. Bill Sponsors: Representatives Dave Williams and Stephen Humphrey, Senators Tim Neville and Vicki Marble House Vote: Failed 6-3 in State, Veterans, and Military Affairs Committee SENATE BILL 283 CLARIFY DISCRIMINATION AND RIGHT TO DISAGREE This bill would have allowed businesses and individuals to claim that any belief, including their religion, exempts them from non-discrimination laws they don’t want to follow. Senate Bill 283 was more broadly written than previous discriminatory laws that caused economic backlash in Indiana and North Carolina. Sponsors: Senator Kevin Lundberg Senate Committee Vote: Passed 3-2 • Senate Floor Vote: Failed 19-15 on division LGBTQ Equality 2017 Legislative Scorecard 4 TRANSGENDER EQUALITY Understanding what it’s like to be transgender can be hard, especially if you have never met a transgender person, but every transgender person deserves to be treated fairly and with respect. Most states offer no legal protections in housing, employment, or health care for individuals who experience discrimination based on their gender identity or expression. Thankfully, Colorado law protects transgender people from discrimination in these areas, but Colorado law still makes it burdensome for transgender Coloradans to obtain identity documents that match who they are. HOUSE BILL 1122 BIRTH CERTIFICATE MODERNIZATION ACT This bill would have made the process less burdensome for transgender Coloradans to update the gender on their birth certificate by removing the requirement that a transgender Coloradan undergo surgery and then obtain a court order from a judge. House Bill 1122 would have also brought Colorado law in line with current federal policy for updating the gender on a passport or Social Security card. Transgender people whose birth certificates reflect their sex at birth – and not their current gender – risk being denied housing, employment opportunities, and the right to vote because of this discrepancy. Bill Sponsors: Representative Daneya Esgar, Senator Dominick Moreno House Vote: Passed 37-26-2 • Senate Vote: Failed 3-2 in State, Veterans, and Military Affairs Committee LGBTQ Equality 2017 Legislative Scorecard 5 LGBTQ HEALTH While lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer Coloradans face many of the same health care challenges as the general population, they also encounter unique obstacles to fulfilling their specific health needs. Affordability, access, and quality issues confront LGBTQ Coloradans as a whole, and transgender people are often the most vulnerable. An equitable health care system in Colorado can be achieved, but only if disparities are clearly identified and action is taken to eliminate them. During this legislative session, a bill was introduced to protect LGBTQ young people from the harmful practice of conversion therapy along with an unsuccessful effort to defund the Healthy Kids Colorado Survey, which supports the needs of students across Colorado. HOUSE BILL 1156 BAN ON CONVERSION THERAPY Conversion therapy – sometimes referred to as “reparative therapy,” “ex-gay therapy,” or “sexual orientation change efforts” – includes a range of dangerous and discredited practices aimed at changing a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity. These harmful practices are based on the false claim that being lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer is a mental illness that should be cured. Unfortunately, many young people are coerced and subjected to these harmful practices, which put them at risk for depression, substance abuse, and suicide. House Bill 1156 would have prohibited state-licensed mental health care providers in Colorado from practicing conversion therapy on anyone under the age of 18. Bill Sponsors: Representative Paul Rosenthal, Senator Steve Fenberg House Vote: Passed 38-27 • Senate: Failed 3-2 in State, Veterans, and Military Affairs Committee AMENDMENT TO THE STATE BUDGET DEFUNDING THE HEALTHY KIDS COLORADO SURVEY The Healthy Kids Colorado Survey is a voluntary, anonymous survey that provides the state with vital information about the health and wellbeing of Colorado’s middle and high school students. The information in the survey helps government agencies address the challenges students across Colorado face, including lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer students. Senate Vote: Failed 18-17 LGBTQ Equality 2017 Legislative Scorecard 6 PROTECTING LGBTQ COLORADANS Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer Coloradans deserve to be protected from harassment, discrimination, and violence no matter where they live. During this legislative session, a bill was introduced to add sexual orientation, gender identity, and physical or mental disability to Colorado’s bias-motivated harassment statutes and, in an unprecedented action, the Colorado State Senate rejected an LGBTQ Coloradan’s appointment to the Colorado Civil Rights Commission. HOUSE BILL 1188 CONCERNING BIAS-MOTIVATED HARASSMENT This bill adds physical or mental disability and sexual orientation (including transgender status) to the protected categories in the harassment statute to make the statute consistent with Colorado’s existing law concerning bias-motivated crimes. Bill Sponsors: Representative Mike Foote, Senators Dominick Moreno and Don Coram House Vote: Passed 48-15-2 • Senate Committee Vote: Passed 5-0 • Senate Floor Vote: Passed 23-12 Signed by Governor: May 3, 2017 CONFIRMATION OF HEIDI HESS TO THE COLORADO CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION In a rare move, the Colorado State Senate voted to not confirm Heidi Hess – who is One Colorado’s part-time, Western Slope Field Organizer – to the Colorado Civil Rights Commission. Heidi has served on the Commission for over 4 years, and is currently its chair. As a proud, out, lesbian, Heidi’s work has been crucial in building public support for civil unions and the freedom to marry on the Western Slope. Over the past decade, she has been responsible for building a connected and robust community of LGBTQ people and allies in her community. Senate Vote: Failed 17-18 LGBTQ Equality 2017 Legislative Scorecard 7 2017 HOUSE VOTES LGBTQ Equality 2017 Legislative Scorecard 8 2017 HOUSE VOTES
Recommended publications
  • 2018 Scorecard
    A NOTE FROM PUBLIC POLICY DIRECTOR DENISE MAES COLORADO’S legislative ty jails. We also attempted to bring greater ABOUT THIS SCORECARD session is 120 days and transparency to police internal affairs’ files, a great deal happens in to no avail. Our efforts to stop the practice HOW WE CHOSE THE SCORED BILLS these mere four months of revoking an individual’s driver’s license for While the ACLU of Colorado took a po- that affect many Colora- their failure to pay a traffic-related fee was sition on more than 100 pieces of legis- dans. For example, in the also rejected. lation in 2018 alone, our practice is to 2018 session, transportation only score bills that were voted on by and education saw unprece- Our gains, however, are not insignificant. all members of at least one legislative dented gains in funding. The legis- We championed a bill sponsored by Sen. chamber. This precluded us from scor- lature infused $645 million into multi-modal Vicki Marble and Rep. Susan Lontine that ing several bills, including attacks on transportation and infrastructure and increased will bring independent and robust public per pupil funding by $469 per student. defenders to all Colorado municipal courts. reproductive rights that were rightly Incarcerating kids for missing school is a defeated in committee. From there, we Civil liberties legislation rarely gets much at- harsh punishment. Thanks to Sen. Chris chose the bills that we felt were the tention. The one exception this year was the Holbert and Rep. Pete Lee, this practice is best representations of the civil liber- reauthorization of the Colorado Civil Rights Di- now limited.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arc of Colorado 2019 Legislative Scorecard
    The Arc of Colorado 2019 Legislative Scorecard A Letter from Our Executive Director: Dear Members of The Arc Community, Once again, I would like to thank each of you for your part in a successful legislative session. We rely on your expertise in the field. We rely on you for our strength in numbers. For all the ways you contributed this session, we are deeply appreciative. I would like to give a special thanks to those that came and testified on our behalf; Stephanie Garcia, Carol Meredith, Linda Skafflen, Shelby Lowery, Vicki Wray, Rowan Frederiksen, and many others who I may not have mentioned here. This session was a historic one. For the first time in 75 years, one party had control of the house, senate, and governor’s office. Additionally, there were 43 new legislators! We enjoyed a productive year in which The Arc of Colorado monitored 100 bills. Of those that we supported, 92% were signed by the governor and 100% of the bills that we opposed died. This high success rate means that individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families will have more opportunity to better live, work, learn, and play in their Colorado communities, with increased support. We are excited about many of this year’s outcomes. In a very tight budget year, the Joint Budget Committee was able to free up money for 150 additional slots for the Developmental Disabilities waiver waitlist. After three years of involvement, we finally saw the passing of HB19-1194, which places restrictions on suspensions and expulsions of children from preschool, through to second grade.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly State of Colorado Denver
    General Assembly State of Colorado Denver August 14, 2020 Colorado Oil & Gas Conservation Commission 1120 Lincoln St #801 Denver, CO 80203 Via email: [email protected] Nearly a decade in the making, the Colorado legislature passed Senate Bill 19-181 last year, charging the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC) “shall regulate oil and gas operations in a manner to protect and minimize adverse impacts to public health, safety, and welfare, the environment, and wildlife resources and shall protect against adverse impacts on any air, water, soil, or biological resources resulting from oil and gas operations.” This historic bill shifted our state focus to better prioritize health and safety as we also regulate this important industry. SB19-181 also made a significant change to the agency itself shifting the COGCC to full time members who can focus on these key issues. In the coming months, we know that your hard work will be key to implementing the legislative vision of this law. Your presence on this commission is intended to ensure fulfillment of the agency’s new mission. Truly, our constituents and local economies are relying on you, in this role, to help improve their overall wellbeing. This is no small task, which is why your expertise and willingness to join this effort makes us proud. We appreciate your support improving protections for public health, safety, and the environment. Due to the previous mission, COGCC commissioners and staff were often drawn between competing interests, often in conflict. This led to permits granted for oil and gas facilities that were not protective of public health, safety, welfare, the environment and wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • Zero Waste and Recycling Interim Study Committee
    2019 Report to the Colorado General Assembly Zero Waste and Recycling Interim Study Committee Prepared by Legislative Council Staff Research Publication No. 728 December 2019 Zero Waste and Recyling Interim Study Committee Members of the Committee Representative Lisa Cutter, Chair Senator Dominick Moreno, Vice-Chair Senator Don Coram Representative Jeni James Arndt Senator Mike Foote Representative Marc Catlin Senator Kevin Priola Representative Meg Froelich Senator Tammy Story Representative Rod Pelton Legislative Council Staff Amanda King, Senior Research Analyst Andrea Denka, Research Analyst Clare Pramuk, Principal Fiscal Analyst Office of Legislative Legal Services Richard Sweetman, Senior Attorney Jennifer Berman, Senior Attorney Pierce Lively, Staff Attorney Thomas Morris, Managing Senior Attorney Vanessa Cleaver, Legislative Editor December 2019 COLORADO GENERAL ASSEMBLY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE COMMITTEE Sen. Leroy Garcia, Chair Sen. John Cooke Rep. KC Becker, Vice Chair Sen. Lois Court Sen. Stephen Fenberg Rep. Monica Duran Rep. Alec Garnett Rep. Dominique Jackson Sen. Chris Holbert Rep. Susan Lontine Rep. Patrick Neville Sen. Vicki Marble Sen. Dominick Moreno STAFF Rep. Kyle Mullica Natalie Mullis, Director Rep. Lori Saine Elizabeth Burger, Deputy Director Sen. Ray Scott Manish Jani, Deputy Director Rep. Kevin Van Winkle Sen. Angela Williams LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ROOM 029 STATE CAPITOL DENVER, COLORADO 80203-1784 E-mail: [email protected] 303-866-3521 FAX: 303-866-3855 TDD: 303-866-3472 December 2019 To Members of the Seventy-second General Assembly: Submitted herewith is the final report of the Zero Waste and Recycling Interim Study Committee. This committee was created pursuant to Interim Committee Request Letter 2019-02. The purpose of this committee is to study waste and recycling infrastructure, composting, and public awareness of moving toward zero waste in Colorado.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief of Amici Curiae Colorado Organizations and Individuals in Support of Respondents, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. V
    No. 16-111 In the Supreme Court of the United States MASTERPIECE CAKESHOP, LTD., ET AL., Petitioners, v. COLORADO CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION, ET AL., Respondents. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE COLORADO ORGANIZATIONS AND INDIVIDUALS IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS EVAN WOLFSON MELISSA HART LINO S. LIPINSKY DE ORLOV Schaden Chair and PETER Z. STOCKBURGER Professor of Law ERIC Y. WU CRAIG J. KONNOTH Dentons US LLP Associate Professor of Law 1400 Wewatta Street Counsel of Record Suite 700 SCOTT SKINNER-THOMPSON Denver, CO 80202-5548 Associate Professor of Law University of Colorado School of Law 425 Wolf Law Building, 401 UCB Boulder, CO 80309-0401 (303) 735-6397 [email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES....................................iii INTEREST OF THE AMICI CURIAE.....................1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT..................................2 ARGUMENT.............................................................4 I. CADA FULFILLS THE STATE’S COMPELLING INTEREST IN PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF ALL ITS CITIZENS, INCLUDING LGBT COLORADANS, TO EQUAL DIGNITY AND THE OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PUBLIC SPHERE BY PROTECTING THEM AGAINST DISCRIMINATION IN PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS ........................4 A. LGBT Coloradans have faced a history of demeaning and discriminatory treatment.........4 B. The legislative record of CADA demonstrates that it was amended to address this history of discrimination...........................9 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page II. AN EXPRESSIVE OR RELIGIOUS EXCEPTION TO CADA WOULD SEVERELY UNDERMINE ANTIDISCRIMINATION PROTECTIONS AND SUBJECT LGBT AND, MOST LIKELY, OTHER COLORADANS TO WIDESPREAD DISCRIMINATION ..........................14 A. CADA’s protections reach across a wide array of public and commercial contexts..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Social Media
    Social Media 1- Find your legislators based on your school district area ​ ​ 2- Do your homework to fill in the highlighted areas below ​ ​ 3- Have these talking points on hand ​ ​ Social media includes any form of online publication where end users post or engage in conversation and may include blogs, podcasts, virtual reality and social networks. Sample Social Media Content: Tweets — Week of May 4 Investment in schools is an investment in our state’s infrastructure.​ @dlesgar, @domoreno, @McCluskieforCO, @votebobrankin, @KimRansom, @Zenzinger_AtoZ — Create a budget that reflects this value. #OurCOFuture #coleg #FundingMatters https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/15/politics/what-matters-april-14/in dex.html @dlesgar, @domoreno, @McCluskieforCO, @votebobrankin, @KimRansom, @Zenzinger_AtoZ — Past solutions to statewide budget shortfalls have led to growing inequities across the state. It’s time for a change. #OurCOFuture #coleg #FundingMatters https://casb.memberclicks.net/assets/2020/COVID-19/colorado-re mote-learning-impact-final.pdf Just emailed @dlesgar, @domoreno, @McCluskieforCO, @votebobrankin, @KimRansom, @Zenzinger_AtoZ about providing adequate and sustainable funding in order to provide the essential services our communities need. #OurCOFuture #coleg #FundingMatters Colorado schools are facing devastating budget cuts without fully recovering from prior cuts. It took the state 11 years to recover from ​ 2008 and state share of ed funding never recovered. #OurCOFuture ​ #coleg #FundingMatters​ @dlesgar, @domoreno, ​ @McCluskieforCO, @votebobrankin,
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Journal-1St Day-January 4, 2019 Page 1 SENATE
    Senate Journal-1st Day-January 4, 2019 Page 1 SENATE JOURNAL 1 Seventy-second General Assembly 2 STATE OF COLORADO 3 First Regular Session 4 5 6 1st Legislative Day Friday, January 4, 2019 7 8 9 10 Prayer By the chaplain, Father Joseph Vigil, St. Joseph's Parish, Pueblo. 11 12 Presentation By the Pueblo Fire Department, IAFF Local 3. 13 of Colors Members: Ken Kilcullen, Jeff Aube, Joey Gutierrez, John Dorland, and Adam Haman. 14 Attending: Chief Shawn Shelton. 15 16 Pledge By Senator Garcia's sons, Jeremiah and Xan, and his nieces and nephews, Emmalyn, 17 of Allegiance Jacquline, Jasmine, Kourtney, Jake, and Logan. 18 19 Musical By The Sankey Sisters, Chelse Rollins and Chenia Sankey, from Pueblo. Performing 20 Presentation "The Star-Spangled Banner" and a medley "America the Beautiful/God Bless America". 21 22 Call to The hour of 10:00 a.m. having arrived, the Senate of the 72nd General Assembly of the 23 Order State of Colorado, pursuant to law, was called to order by Senator Kevin J. Grantham, 24 President of the Senate of the 71st General Assembly of the State of Colorado. 25 26 ____________ 27 28 29 LETTERS OF RESIGNATION 30 31 December 4, 2018 32 33 Effie Ameen, Secretary of the Senate 34 Max Majors, Assistant Secretary of the Senate 35 State Capitol Building 36 200 E. Colfax Avenue 37 Denver, Colorado 80203 38 39 RE: Resignation letter 40 41 This is to inform you that I am resigning my seat representing Senate District 17 in the 42 Colorado state legislature effective the end of the day on January 1, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Ballot Buddy - Congressional District 7 This Page Includes All of the State Legislative Districts That Are Within, Or Partially Within, Congressional District 7
    2020 Ballot Buddy - Congressional District 7 This page includes all of the state legislative districts that are within, or partially within, Congressional District 7. (Only one of the state house races and one of the state senate races will appear on your ballot). Candidates that CVA has endorsed are designated in the right-hand column as a "Pro-Animal Pick." We may not make an endorsement in every race. Our endorsements are non-partisan, and are based solely on the candidate’s stance on animal issues. We consider several factors including questionnaire responses and voting history. New this year, see the bottom of the chart for our full list of District Attorney endorsements. Office Sought and Candidates Incumbent Voting Record (last 6 years): Questionnaire listed in ballot order (may be for different offices) Notes Score Name Party 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 U.S. Senate John W. Hickenlooper DEM Cory Gardner REP 14% 12% 0% (so far) Daniel Doyle AVP Stephan "Seku" Evans UNI Raymon Anthony Doane LIB Danny Skelly (write-in) U Bruce Lohmiller (write-in) GRN Michael Sanchez (write-in) U U.S. Representative - Congressional District 7 Charles "Casper" Stockham REP Ed Perlmutter DEM 92% 86% 83% (so far) David Olszta UNI Ken Biles LIB Steve Zorn (write-in) DEM (Congressional scores compiled by the Humane Society Legislative Fund) Colorado State Senate - Senate District 19 Rachel Zenzinger DEM 100% A- 100% A 100% A+ 100% A++ 100% Pro-Animal Pick! Lynn Gerber REP No Response Colorado State Senate - Senate District 21 Dominick Moreno DEM 100% A-
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Lobby of Colorado 2018 Legislative Scorecard
    Women’s Lobby of Colorado 2018 Legislative Scorecard 1 Women’s Lobby of Colorado P.O. Box 300423 Denver, CO 80203-0423 www.womenslobbyofcolorado.org [email protected] www.facebook.com/WomensLobbyofColorado May 2018 Copyright © Women’s Lobby of Colorado 2018 Front and Back Cover: iStockphoto All other photos courtesy of Ashley Wheeland Designed by The Bridge Studio, a purpose driven, woman-owned small business based in Colorado. Women’s Lobby of Colorado 2018 Legislative Scorecard CELEBRATING 25 YEARS 1 Achievements 2 Rape Shield Law: Protecting Survivors of Assault Passed! 2 Looking Forward 3 2018 LEGISLATIVE SCORECARD 5 HB18-1243 Civil Rape Shield Law 6 HB18-1001 FAMLI – Family Medical Leave Insurance Program 6 HB18-1136 Substance Use Disorder Treatment 6 HB18-1256 Reauthorization of the Colorado Civil Rights Division 7 HB18-1262 Arbitration Services Provider Transparency Act 7 HB18-1352 Oil and Gas Facilities Distance From School Property 7 HB18-1377 Prohibit Seeking Salary Information Job Applicant 7 HB18-1436 Emergency Risk Protection Orders 8 HB18-1391 Sexual Misconduct in Higher Education 8 SB18-013 Expand Child Nutrition Act 8 SB18-024 Expand Access to Behavioral Health Care Providers 8 SB18-087 In-State Tuition Foreign Nationals Settled in Colorado 9 SB18-171 Marketplace Contractor Workers’ Compensation Unemployment 9 HB18-1438 Health Care Coverage Reproductive Health Care 9 Four Anti-Women’s Health Bills in 2018 9 Colorado Senate District, Score, and Votes 10 Colorado House of Representatives District, Score, and Votes 12 CONFRONTING SEXUAL HARASSMENT 17 Recommendations for Addressing Sexual Harassment 19 HR18-1005 Colorado House of Representatives: Votes to Expel Steve Lebsock 20 SR18-003 Colorado Senate: Votes to Expel Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of COLORADO DEPARTMENT of LAW Office of the Attorney General
    PHILIP J. WEISER RALPH L. CARR Attorney General COLORADO JUDICIAL CENTER NATALIE HANLON LEH 1300 Broadway, 8th Floor Chief Deputy Attorney General Denver, Colorado 80203 ERIC R. OLSON Phone (720) 508-6000 Solicitor General STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF LAW Office of the Attorney General November 1, 2019 The Honorable Dominick Moreno Chair, Joint Budget Committee Colorado General Assembly 200 E. 14th Avenue, Third Floor Legislative Services Building Denver, Colorado 80203 RE: FY 2020-2021 Department of Law Budget Request Dear Senator Moreno: Pursuant to Section 2-3-208(2)(a), C.R.S., enclosed is the FY 2020-2021 budget request submitted by the Department of Law (“Department” or “DOL”) to the Colorado General Assembly Joint Budget Committee (“JBC”). I firmly believe that each of these priorities, if approved, are important investments for the State and will provide the Department with necessary resources to fulfill our core mission of providing legal services to client agencies, protecting public safety, and supporting the rule of law. The following sections describe each request submitted for the JBC’s consideration. Decision Item Requests • $129,906 for the Safe2Tell Program to Address Ongoing Training and Materials Distribution Needs. The Safe2Tell program is required to annually provide free training and awareness materials. To do right by this effort so that Colorado students, teachers, and parents can best access information and reporting tools, Safe2Tell requires resources to continue and develop effective outreach. This is especially urgent in light of the dramatic and continuing increases in Safe2Tell tips; the program expects over 20,000 this school year.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Year End Report
    1 Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2014 A Message from Craig Silliman Verizon is affected by a wide variety of government policies ‐‐ from telecommunications regulation to taxation to health care and more ‐‐ that have an enormous impact on the business climate in which we operate. We owe it to our shareowners, employees and customers to advocate public policies that will enable us to compete fairly and freely in the marketplace. Political contributions are one way we support the democratic electoral process and participate in the policy dialogue. Our employees have established political action committees at the federal level and in 18 states. These political action committees (PACs) allow employees to pool their resources to support candidates for office who generally support the public policies our employees advocate. This report lists all PAC contributions, corporate political contributions, support for ballot initiatives and independent expenditures made by Verizon during 2014. The contribution process is overseen by the Corporate Governance and Policy Committee of our Board of Directors, which receives a comprehensive report and briefing on these activities at least annually. We intend to update this voluntary disclosure twice a year and publish it on our corporate website. We believe this transparency with respect to our political spending is in keeping with our commitment to good corporate governance and a further sign of our responsiveness to the interests of our shareowners. Craig L. Silliman Executive Vice President, Public Policy and General Counsel 2 Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2014 Political Contributions Policy: Our Voice in the Political Process What are the Verizon Good Government Clubs? contributions process including the setting of The Verizon Good Government Clubs (GGCs) exist to monetary contribution limitations and the help the people of Verizon participate in America’s establishment of periodic reporting requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Pfizer Inc. Regarding Congruency of Political Contributions on Behalf of Tara Health Foundation
    SANFORD J. LEWIS, ATTORNEY January 28, 2021 Via electronic mail Office of Chief Counsel Division of Corporation Finance U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20549 Re: Shareholder Proposal to Pfizer Inc. Regarding congruency of political contributions on Behalf of Tara Health Foundation Ladies and Gentlemen: Tara Health Foundation (the “Proponent”) is beneficial owner of common stock of Pfizer Inc. (the “Company”) and has submitted a shareholder proposal (the “Proposal”) to the Company. I have been asked by the Proponent to respond to the supplemental letter dated January 25, 2021 ("Supplemental Letter") sent to the Securities and Exchange Commission by Margaret M. Madden. A copy of this response letter is being emailed concurrently to Margaret M. Madden. The Company continues to assert that the proposal is substantially implemented. In essence, the Company’s original and supplemental letters imply that under the substantial implementation doctrine as the company understands it, shareholders are not entitled to make the request of this proposal for an annual examination of congruency, but that a simple written acknowledgment that Pfizer contributions will sometimes conflict with company values is all on this topic that investors are entitled to request through a shareholder proposal. The Supplemental letter makes much of the claim that the proposal does not seek reporting on “instances of incongruency” but rather on how Pfizer’s political and electioneering expenditures aligned during the preceding year against publicly stated company values and policies.” While the company has provided a blanket disclaimer of why its contributions may sometimes be incongruent, the proposal calls for an annual assessment of congruency.
    [Show full text]