DOCSLIB.ORG

Exploring Cascadia Earthquake Probabilities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Exploring Cascadia Earthquake Probabilities Is the coast toast? Exploring Cascadia earthquake probabilities Seth Stein, Dept. of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Northwestern University, and Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA; Leah Salditch, Dept. of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA; Edward Brooks, Dept. of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Northwestern University and Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA; Bruce Spencer, Dept. of Statistics, Northwestern University and Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA; and Michael Campbell, Dept. of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA The earthquake hazard in the Pacific earthquake occurred in 1700 CE. This cannot be “overdue.” Using the entire Northwest due to subduction of the Juan record (Fig. 1B) spans 10,000 years, among paleoearthquake record, the chance of an de Fuca plate beneath North America the world’s longest (Goldfinger et al., 2012, earthquake in the next 50 years is 50/530 = (Fig. 1A) is drawing much media attention. 2013). 0.094 or 9.4%. Alternatively, assuming that A The New Yorker article (Schulz, 2015) The recurrence intervals, differences we are still in the recent cluster gives a begins, “An earthquake will destroy a between the dates of successive paleo- probability about twice as large: 50/326 = sizable portion of the coastal Northwest. earthquakes, are key to estimating when 0.15 or 15%. The question is when.” The article quotes the next may occur. The 18 intervals have Time-independent models are used in a FEMA official saying “everything west a mean of 530 years and a standard devia- forecasting floods or hurricanes and in of Interstate 5 will be toast.” CBS stated, tion of 271 years. However, earthquakes many earthquake hazard studies. However, “Northwest in fear of massive earthquake, seem to have happened in clusters of seismological instincts favor earthquake tsunami.” NPR reported “Sleeping giant events, separated by 700–1000-year gaps. cycle models, in which strain builds up overdue.” Stories include statements like, The recent cluster covering 1500 years has slowly after an earthquake to produce the “In the next 50 years, there is a 1-in-10 a mean of 326 years and standard deviation next one. In this case, the probability of a chance a ‘really big one’ will erupt,” or, of 88 years. Earthquakes within a cluster large earthquake is small immediately “the odds of the big Cascadia earthquake occur more frequently and regularly than after one occurs and grows with time. In in the next fifty years are roughly one in in the full record. Hence, when to expect such time-dependent models, the recur- three.” the next earthquake depends on whether rence interval is described by a probability These stories lead students to ask where we assume that we are in the recent cluster, density function. The simplest uses the these probabilities come from and what they or that the cluster is over. familiar Gaussian distribution. The “bell mean, which offers an educational oppor- curves” in Figure 1C show probabilities of tunity. Although earthquake probabilities EARTHQUAKE PROBABILITY an earthquake in the next year, which peak are typically addressed in upper-level MODELS at dates corresponding to the assumed classes (Stein and Wysession, 2003; Stein Most students have learned about prob- mean recurrence. Assuming we are in the and Stein, 2014), they can be discussed at ability models from games of chance—the recent cluster, the probability is high, an introductory level. chance of a flipped coin coming up heads because the 317 years since 1700 CE is Earthquake probability estimates is 50%. However, earthquake probabilities about the mean recurrence of 326 years. involve two primary choices: which data are more complicated. Despite years of The probability is lower assuming that we are used to describe when past earth- effort, seismologists have not found a are not in the cluster, because the mean quakes happened and which models are good way to describe them. Although recurrence for the entire record is 530 used to forecast when future earthquakes many methods are used, all fall into two years, so we are not as far into the cycle. will happen. These choices’ effects can be basic classes. To find the probability of an earthquake illustrated with simple examples. In one, large earthquakes’ recurrence is in 50 years, we integrate under a bell curve described by a time-independent (Poisson) from a start time to 50 years in the future, PAST EARTHQUAKE DATA process. This has no “memory,” so a future and include the fact that the earthquake Although no large earthquakes occurred earthquake is equally likely immediately hasn’t happened by the start time. The along the plate interface for hundreds of after the past one and much later. The resulting curves (Fig. 1D), called condi- years, a record of large paleoearthquakes probability of an earthquake in the next tional probabilities, are small shortly after has been compiled from subsidence data t years is approximately t/τ, where τ is the 1700 CE and increase with time. Using the on land and turbidites, offshore deposits assumed mean recurrence time. Because entire record, the chance of an earthquake recording slope failure. The most recent this probability is constant, an earthquake in 50 years after 2017 is 0.074 or 7.4%. GSA Today, v. 27, doi: 10.1130/GSATG350GW.1. Copyright 2017, The Geological Society of America. A B Goldfinger et al. (2012). Earthquake prob- ability issues can be explored from discus- sions in Stark and Freedman (2003), Parsons (2008), Matthews et al. (2002), and Paleoearthquake History Kagan et al. (2012). recent cluster The take-home message for students is that saying “the probability of an earth- quake is N%” involves specifying the assumptions made. Different plausible 8000 BCE 6000 BCE 4000 BCE 2000 BCE 0 2000 CE assumptions yield different probabilities. This situation may seem frustrating, but it lets instructors explain how limitations in Earthquake probability our knowledge give young scientists D opportunities for major advances. in next 50 years C Annual earthquake probability 40% ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Time dependent We thank Michael Hubenthal and three reviewers for helpful comments. 0.004 2017- 30% 2067 Recent cluster REFERENCES CITED 20% Recent cluster Time independent Goldfinger, C., Nelson, C.H., Morey, A.E., 0.002 Johnson, J.E., Patton, J.R., Karabanov, E., All data Time independent Gutiérrez-Pastor, J., Eriksson, A.T., Gràcia, E., 10% Dunhill, G., Enkin, R.J., Dallimore, A., and All data Time Vallier, T., 2012, Turbidite event history— 0 Dependent 0% Methods and implications for Holocene 1700 1900 2100 2300 2500 2700 1700 1800 1900 2000 paleoseismicity of the Cascadia subduction zone: Date Date USGS Professional Paper 1661-F. Figure 1. (A) Geometry of the Cascadia subduction zone. (B) Paleoearthquake history from turbidite Goldfinger, C., Ikeda, Y., and Yeats, R.S., 2013, deposits. (C) Probabilities of an earthquake in the next year as a function of time assuming a Gauss- Superquakes, supercycles, and global earthquake ian distribution of recurrence times with mean and standard deviation corresponding to the recent clustering, 7 Jan. 2013: Earth, https://www. cluster (red/dashed lines) or the entire paleoearthquake record (blue/solid lines). Shaded area earthmagazine.org/article/superquakes- under the curves corresponds to the probability in next 50 years. (D) Conditional probability of an supercycles-and-global-earthquake-clustering- earthquake in next 50 years, given that last was in 1700, for the four cases discussed. recent-research-and-recent-quakes (last accessed 17 Aug. 2017). However, assuming that we are still in the subduction zone. Each choice yields a dif- Kagan, Y.Y., Jackson, D.D., and Geller, R.J., 2012, Characteristic earthquake model, 1884–2011, recent cluster gives a probability ~6 times ferent probability estimate. R.I.P.: Seismological Research Letters, v. 83, larger: 0.41 or 41%. The higher probability A baseball analogy illustrates these p. 951–953, doi:10.1785/0220120107. results from the smaller mean recurrence ideas. Whether to assume that we are in Matthews, M.V., Ellsworth, W.L., and Reasenberg, time and standard deviation. the cluster is like whether to assume that a P.A., 2002, A Brownian model for recurrent Figure 1D also shows flat lines starting hitter’s performance in the next game is earthquakes: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 92, p. 2233–2250, at 1700 CE, corresponding to time-inde- better described by his lifetime batting doi:10.1785/0120010267. pendent models. If the time-dependent average or by the past few games, because Parsons, T., 2008, Earthquake recurrence on the model predicts higher probability than the he may be hitting unusually well or in a south Hayward fault is most consistent with a time-independent model, an earthquake slump. Choosing between time‐indepen- time dependent, renewal process: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 35, can be considered “overdue,” which occurs dent or time-dependent models is like doi:10.1029/2008GL035887. if we are in the cluster. assuming either that the player’s hitting is Schulz, K., 2015, The really big one: The New the same from year to year or that it Yorker, 20 July, p. 20. IMPLICATIONS AND changes systematically over his career. The Stark, P.B., and Freedman, D., 2003, What is the OPPORTUNITIES chance of an earthquake?, in Mulargia, F., Geller, probability of a hit in the next game R.J. eds., Earthquake Science and Seismic Risk Comparing these cases shows how depends on the assumptions. Reduction: Dordrecht, Netherlands, Kluwer. earthquake probability estimates depend There are many opportunities for delv- Stein, S., and Stein, J., 2014, Playing against nature: on the probability model chosen and the ing further.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What's Shaking
    ISSUE 03 - February 2016 WHAT’S SHAKING newsletter of the THE NEVADA SEISMOLOGICAL LABORATORY Earthquake Update NEVADA Carson RENO City Maps of earthquakes located by the Nevada Seismo- logical Laboratory (NSL) between 1/1/16 and 1/31/16, within the NSL network (right). Truckee Meadows region (above), Hawthorne, Nevada area (bottom left) and the area surrounding Las Vegas, Nevada (bottom right). HAWTHORNE Earthquakes located by the NSL (1/1/16-1/31/16) ML Quantity 4.0+ 1 3.0-3.9 2 2.0-2.9 67 Nevada 1.0-1.9 478 National ML < 1.0 809 Security Site Total 1357 eismicity during January included a small sequence near Haw- Sthorne, Nevada (above), and a notable sequence near Enter- LAS VEGAS prise, Utah (right). The largest of these Hawthorne events measured M3.2, and several events greater than M2.0 were also recorded. An event (M4.3) that occurred near Enterprise, Utah shook several eastern Nevada communities on January 15, 2016. The Sheldon Sequence also continues to be active in northwestern Nevada. Maps compiled by D. Molisee (2016) www.graphicdiffer.comwww.seismo.unr.edu @NVSeismoLab1 DEVELOPMENTS NSL Graduate Students Leverage Funding from the National Science Foundation unding for Steve Angster and will focus on the Agai-Pai, Indian FIan Pierce has come from Head, Gumdrop, Benton Springs, a National Science Foundation and Petrified fault systems, while grant (Steve Wesnousky, lead PI) Ian will study the Tahoe, Carson, focused on the deformation pat- Antelope Valley, Smith Valley, Ma- tern and kinematics of the Walker son Valley, and Walker Lake fault Lane.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic History of Siletzia, a Large Igneous Province in the Oregon And
    Geologic history of Siletzia, a large igneous province in the Oregon and Washington Coast Range: Correlation to the geomagnetic polarity time scale and implications for a long-lived Yellowstone hotspot Wells, R., Bukry, D., Friedman, R., Pyle, D., Duncan, R., Haeussler, P., & Wooden, J. (2014). Geologic history of Siletzia, a large igneous province in the Oregon and Washington Coast Range: Correlation to the geomagnetic polarity time scale and implications for a long-lived Yellowstone hotspot. Geosphere, 10 (4), 692-719. doi:10.1130/GES01018.1 10.1130/GES01018.1 Geological Society of America Version of Record http://cdss.library.oregonstate.edu/sa-termsofuse Downloaded from geosphere.gsapubs.org on September 10, 2014 Geologic history of Siletzia, a large igneous province in the Oregon and Washington Coast Range: Correlation to the geomagnetic polarity time scale and implications for a long-lived Yellowstone hotspot Ray Wells1, David Bukry1, Richard Friedman2, Doug Pyle3, Robert Duncan4, Peter Haeussler5, and Joe Wooden6 1U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefi eld Road, Menlo Park, California 94025-3561, USA 2Pacifi c Centre for Isotopic and Geochemical Research, Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, 6339 Stores Road, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada 3Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 1680 East West Road, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA 4College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, 104 CEOAS Administration Building, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-5503, USA 5U.S. Geological Survey, 4210 University Drive, Anchorage, Alaska 99508-4626, USA 6School of Earth Sciences, Stanford University, 397 Panama Mall Mitchell Building 101, Stanford, California 94305-2210, USA ABSTRACT frames, the Yellowstone hotspot (YHS) is on southern Vancouver Island (Canada) to Rose- or near an inferred northeast-striking Kula- burg, Oregon (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Cascadia Low Frequency Earthquakes at the Base of an Overpressured Subduction Shear Zone ✉ Andrew J
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17609-3 OPEN Cascadia low frequency earthquakes at the base of an overpressured subduction shear zone ✉ Andrew J. Calvert 1 , Michael G. Bostock 2, Geneviève Savard 3 & Martyn J. Unsworth4 In subduction zones, landward dipping regions of low shear wave velocity and elevated Poisson’s ratio, which can extend to at least 120 km depth, are interpreted to be all or part of the subducting igneous oceanic crust. This crust is considered to be overpressured, because fl 1234567890():,; uids within it are trapped beneath an impermeable seal along the overlying inter-plate boundary. Here we show that during slow slip on the plate boundary beneath southern Vancouver Island, low frequency earthquakes occur immediately below both the landward dipping region of high Poisson’s ratio and a 6–10 km thick shear zone revealed by seismic reflections. The plate boundary here either corresponds to the low frequency earthquakes or to the anomalous elastic properties in the lower 3–5 km of the shear zone immediately above them. This zone of high Poisson’s ratio, which approximately coincides with an electrically conductive layer, can be explained by slab-derived fluids trapped at near-lithostatic pore pressures. 1 Department of Earth Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada. 2 Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, 2207 Main Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada. 3 Department of Geosciences, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada. 4 Department of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep-Water Turbidites As Holocene Earthquake Proxies: the Cascadia Subduction Zone and Northern San Andreas Fault Systems
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Faculty Publications 10-1-2003 Deep-water turbidites as Holocene earthquake proxies: the Cascadia subduction zone and Northern San Andreas Fault systems Chris Goldfinger Oregon State University C. Hans Nelson Universidad de Granada Joel E. Johnson University of New Hampshire, Durham, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/faculty_pubs Recommended Citation Goldfinger, C. Nelson, C.H., and Johnson, J.E., 2003, Deep-Water Turbidites as Holocene Earthquake Proxies: The Cascadia Subduction Zone and Northern San Andreas Fault Systems. Annals of Geophysics, 46(5), 1169-1194. http://dx.doi.org/10.4401%2Fag-3452 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ANNALS OF GEOPHYSICS, VOL. 46, N. 5, October 2003 Deep-water turbidites as Holocene earthquake proxies: the Cascadia subduction zone and Northern San Andreas Fault systems Chris Goldfinger (1),C. Hans Nelson (2) (*), Joel E. Johnson (1)and the Shipboard Scientific Party (1) College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, U.S.A. (2) Department of Oceanography, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas, U.S.A. Abstract New stratigraphic evidence from the Cascadia margin demonstrates that 13 earthquakes ruptured the margin from Vancouver Island to at least the California border following the catastrophic eruption of Mount Mazama. These 13 events have occurred with an average repeat time of ¾ 600 years since the first post-Mazama event ¾ 7500 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • New Stratigraphic Evidence from the Cascadia Margin Demonstrates That
    Agency: U. S. Geological Survey Award Number: 03HQGR0059 Project Title: Holocene Seismicity of the Northern San Andreas Fault Based on Precise Dating of the Turbidite Event Record. Collaborative Research with Oregon State University and Granada University. End Date: 12/31/2003 Final Technical Report Keywords: Paleoseismology Recurrence interval Rupture characteristics Age Dating Principle Investigators: Chris Goldfinger College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331; email: [email protected] C. Hans Nelson Now at Instituto Andaluz de Ciencias de la Tierra, CSIC, Universidad de Granada, Campus de Fuente Nueva s/n ,Granada,18071 Graduate Student: Joel E. Johnson College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331; email: [email protected] Northern San Andreas Seismotectonic Setting The San Andreas Fault is probably the best-known transform system in the world. Extending along the west cost of North America, from the Salton Sea to Cape Mendocino, it is the largest component of a complex and wide plate boundary that extends eastward to encompass numerous other strike-slip fault strands and interactions with the Basin and Range extensional province. The Mendocino Triple junction lies at the termination of the northern San Andreas, and has migrated northward since about 25-28 Ma. As the triple junction moves, the former subduction forearc transitions to right lateral transform motion. West of the Sierra Nevada block, three main fault systems accommodate ~75% of the Pacific-North America plate motion, distributed over a 100 km wide zone (Argus and Gordon, 1991). The remainder is carried by the Eastern California Shear Zone (Argus and Gordon, 1991; Sauber, 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquake Scenario
    CCaassccaaddiiaa SSuubbdduuccttiioonn ZZoonnee EEaarrtthhqquuaakkeess:: AA MMaaggnniittuuddee 99..00 EEaarrtthhqquuaakkee SScceennaarriioo Update, 2013 Cascadia Region Earthquake Workgroup Also available as Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Information Circular 116, Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Open-File Report 0-13-22, and British Columbia Geological Survey Information Circular 2013-3 Cascadia Region Earthquake Workgroup (CREW) CREW is a non-profit coalition of business people, emergency managers, scientists, engineers, civic leaders, and government officials who are working together to reduce the effects of earthquakes in the Pacific Northwest. Executive Board President: John Schelling, Washington Emergency Management Division Vice President: Michael Kubler, Emergency Management, Providence Health & Services, Portland, OR Past President: Cale Ash, Degenkolb Engineers Secretary: Teron Moore, Emergency Management, British Columbia Treasurer: Timothy Walsh, State of Washington Department of Natural Resources Executive Director: Heidi Kandathil Board of Directors Steven Bibby, Security and Emergency Services, BC Housing Josh Bruce, Oregon Partnership for Disaster Resilience Kathryn Forge, Public Safety Canada Jere High, Oregon State Public Health Division Andre LeDuc, University of Oregon Charlie Macaulay, Global Risk Consultants Ines Pearce, Pearce Global Partners Althea Rizzo, Oregon Emergency Management Bill Steele, University of Washington, Pacific Northwest Seismic Network Yumei Wang, Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Supporting members Tamra Biasco, FEMA, Region X Craig Weaver, U.S. Geological Survey Joan Gomberg, U.S. Geological Survey Nate Wood, U.S. Geological Survey Acknowledgments CREW would like to thank Tamra Biasco and Joan Gomberg for overseeing the development of this updated edition of Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquakes: A Magnitude 9.0 Earthquake Scenario. We would also like to thank everyone who shared information and materials or contributed their time and expertise to this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Estimates of Future Earthquake Losses
    Earthquake damage in Oregon: Preliminary estimates of future earthquake losses Cascadia Subduction lone earthquake model: Least dangerous areas are yellow, most dangerous are darkest red. 500 year recurrence interval model (including many earth quakes): Least dangerous areas are yellow, most dangerous are darkest red. - l Special Paper 29 by Yumei Wang and J. L. Clark Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries 1999 Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Special Papers, JSSN 0278-3703 PUblished in conformance with ORS 516.030 This report is a summay of a more complete description of a Deportment of Geology and Minerallndus1ries study. Open-File Report 0-98-3, which contains details about vaious types of acceleration and ground motion and is targeted to scientific and engineering users. as well as emergency planners. For copies of these publications or other information about Oregon's geology and natural resources. contact: Nature of the Northwest Information Center 800 NE Oegon Street #5 Portland. Oegon 972':!2. (503) 872-275) http:/ /www.naturenw.org SPECIAL PAPER 29 EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE IN OREGON: Preliminary estimates of future earthquake losses by Yumei Wang and J.L Clark Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries 1999 STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES Donald A. Hull. State Geologist Table of Contents Executive summary ................... ... ......................................................... ............... ............ ......... 1 Introduction ................. .. .......
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary Rupture of a Crustal Fault Beneath Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
    Quaternary Rupture of a Crustal Fault beneath Victoria, British Columbia, Canada Kristin D. Morell, School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia V8P 5C2, Canada, kmorell@ uvic.ca; Christine Regalla, Department of Earth and Environment, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA; Lucinda J. Leonard, School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia V8P 5C2, Canada; Colin Amos, Geology Department, Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington 98225-9080, USA; and Vic Levson, School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia V8P 5C2, Canada ABSTRACT detectable by seismic or geodetic monitor- US$10 billion in damage (Quigley et The seismic potential of crustal faults ing (e.g., Mosher et al., 2000; Balfour et al., al., 2012). within the forearc of the northern Cascadia 2011). This point was exemplified by the In the forearc of the Cascadia subduc- 2010 M 7.1 Darfield, New Zealand tion zone (Fig. 1), where strain accrues due subduction zone in British Columbia has W remained elusive, despite the recognition (Christchurch), earthquake and aftershocks to the combined effects of northeast- of recent seismic activity on nearby fault that ruptured the previously unidentified directed subduction and the northward systems within the Juan de Fuca Strait. In Greendale fault (Gledhill et al., 2011). This migration of the Oregon forearc block this paper, we present the first evidence for crustal fault showed little seismic activity (McCaffrey et al., 2013), microseismicity earthquake surface ruptures along the prior to 2010, but nonetheless produced a data are sparse and do not clearly elucidate Leech River fault, a prominent crustal fault 30-km-long surface rupture, caused more planar crustal faults (Cassidy et al., 2000; near Victoria, British Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Hanford Sitewide Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis 2014
    Hanford Sitewide Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis 2014 Contents 4.0 The Hanford Site Tectonic Setting ............................................................................................... 4.1 4.1 Tectonic Setting.................................................................................................................... 4.1 4.2 Contemporary Plate Motions and Tectonic Stress Regime .................................................. 4.11 4.3 Late Cenozoic and Quaternary History ................................................................................ 4.16 4.3.1 Post-CRB Regional Stratigraphy ............................................................................... 4.17 4.3.2 Summary of Late Miocene, Pliocene and Quaternary History .................................. 4.19 4.4 Seismicity in the Hanford Site Region ................................................................................. 4.21 4.4.1 Crustal Seismicity ..................................................................................................... 4.21 4.4.2 Cascadia Subduction Zone Seismicity ...................................................................... 4.26 4.5 References ............................................................................................................................ 4.28 4.i 2014 Hanford Sitewide Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis Figures 4.1 Plate tectonic setting of the Hanford Site .................................................................................... 4.1 4.2 Areal extent
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoseismicity of the Southern End of the Cascadia Subduction Zone, Northwestern California by David W
    Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 102, No. 3, pp. 1059–1078, June 2012, doi: 10.1785/0120110103 Ⓔ Paleoseismicity of the Southern End of the Cascadia Subduction Zone, Northwestern California by David W. Valentine, Edward A. Keller, Gary Carver, Wen-Hao Li, Christine Manhart, and Alexander R. Simms Abstract The southern end of the Cascadia subduction zone (CSZ) in northwestern California poses a high seismic hazard. This study uses the Quaternary stratigraphy of the bays and estuaries to reconstruct coseismic subsidence caused by strong to great earthquakes. We used lithology, macrofossils, and microfossils to estimate the amount of relative sea-level change at contacts caused by coseismic subsidence. Our paleo- seismic record contains evidence of four to six earthquakes over the past 2000 years. Using the pattern and magnitude of submergence and other paleoseismic information (trenches and other sites), we determine whether the earthquakes were local or regio- nal. We found that the record contained evidence for both smaller strong to major earthquakes on local structures (Mw 6.5–7.2) and larger regional subduction-zone- M >8:2 related great earthquakes ( w ). We compared our record to other records from Oregon and Washington and found three earthquakes likely caused by the rupture of the entire CSZ around approximately 230–270 (the A.D. 1700 event), 1150–1400, and 1750–1900 cal B.P. In addition, two other local earthquakes likely occurred around 500–600, 1000–1250, and possibly 1500–1650 cal B.P. Online Material: Table of radiocarbon ages obtained in the study. Introduction Prior to the works of Heaton and Kanamori (1984) and Our new record of earthquakes is compared to other paleoseis- Atwater (1987), the earthquake and tsunami threat along the mic studies further to the north to provide a better understand- Cascadia subduction zone (CSZ) was classified as minimal ing of the length of rupture along the CSZ.
    [Show full text]
  • California Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquake and Tsunami
    California Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquake and Tsunami Response Plan US Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency Region IX California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services September 2013 Public Version California Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquake and Tsunami Response Plan This page intentionally left blank. ii California Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquake and Tsunami Response Plan Security Information The full version of this document contains sensitive but unclassified information and is FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO). Due to the sensitive nature of information contained in parts of this plan, these materials are classified as “Sensitive But Unclassified” and only available to individuals requiring a “need-to- know” basis. All individuals needing this information have been provided these materials as appropriate. Those materials in this document have been identified with a note of redaction. iii California Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquake and Tsunami Response Plan This page intentionally left blank. iv California Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquake and Tsunami Response Plan Message from FEMA RIX Regional Administrator and the Governor’s Office of Emergency Services Director A catastrophic earthquake and tsunami event along the 800-mile-long Cascadia Subduction Zone, which lies off the northwest coast of the United States, presents a significant danger and a tremendous challenge to the State of California and FEMA Region IX, as well as to the states of Oregon and Washington and FEMA Region X. Earthquakes strike without warning and can forever alter people’s lives, cripple infrastructure, and disrupt the economic and social stability of communities. The Cascadia Subduction Zone (CSZ) experiences a full fault rupture, with earthquakes of magnitudes greater than 7.0, once every 500 years, on average.
    [Show full text]
  • Not My Fault: When It Comes to Cascadia, Not All Parts Are Equal
    There were many areas of agreement. The central or Juan de Fuca region offshore of Oregon and Washington is the only part that is behaving like a classic plate with earthquakes concentrated on the boundaries and a quake- Not My Fault: When it comes to free interior. The Gorda and Explorer regions are riddled Cascadia, not all parts are equal with intraplate earthquakes. Since 2000, over 200 Lori Dengler/For the Times-Standard earthquakes of magnitude 4 and larger have occurred Posted June 27, 2021 within the Explorer plate, including nine in the M6 range. https://www.times-standard.com/2021/06/26/lori-dengler- The Gorda plate is likewise earthquake prone. More than when-it-comes-to-cascadia-not-all-parts-are-equal/ 130 M4 and larger earthquakes have occurred with the plate’s interior including a 7.2 and three in the M6 range At some point in the next 15 million years, the Cascadia since 2000. Two 5.9s were recorded only three weeks ago subduction zone (CSZ) will no long pose an earthquake far offshore of the CA-OR border. In contrast, only nine threat to Northern California and the Pacific Northwest. M≥4 intraplate quakes were recorded within the central That’s not a long time geologically speaking, but from a Juan de Fuca plate in this same time period. human perspective it means that in the foreseeable future, the CSZ threat is real. The rate of intraplate earthquake activity in the Gorda and Explorer interiors have led some scientists to argue they The CSZ marks the convergent boundary between the Juan shouldn’t be called ‘plates’ and that ‘deformation zone’ is de Fuca plate system and the North American plate.
    [Show full text]