Catawba-Wateree Relicensing Project Agreement-In-Principle Lake Wateree Perspective
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Assessment of Water Resources and Watershed Conditions in Congaree National Park, South Carolina
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Assessment of Water Resources and Watershed Conditions in Congaree National Park, South Carolina Natural Resource Report NPS/SECN/NRR—2010/267 ON THE COVER Researchers at Wise Lake, an oxbow within Congaree National Park Photograph by: Michael Mallin Assessment of Water Resources and Watershed Conditions in Congaree National Park, South Carolina Natural Resource Report NPS/SECN/NRR—2010/267 Michael A. Mallin and Matthew R. McIver Center for Marine Science University of North Carolina Wilmington Wilmington, NC 28409 December 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received formal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data, and whose background and expertise put them on par technically and scientifically with the authors of the information. -
Finding Birds in South Carolina
Finding Birds in South Carolina Finding Birds in South Carolina Robin M. Carter University of South Carolina Press Copyright © 1993 University of South Carolina Published in Columbia, South Carolina, by the University of South Carolina Press Manufactured in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Carter, Robin M., 1945— Finding birds in South Carolina / Robin M. Carter. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and index. ISBN 0-87249-837-9 (paperback : acid-free) 1. Bird watching—South Carolina—Guidebooks. 1. Title. QL684.S6C27 1993 598'.07234757—dc20 92-24400 Contents Part A—General Information A-1 An Introduction to Finding Birds in South Carolina 1 A-1.1 An Overview of the Natural Regions of South Carolina 1 A-1.2 An Overview of the Habitats for Birds in South Carolina 3 A-2 How to Use This Book 9 A-2.1 Organized by County 9 A-2.2 The Best Birding Areas in South Carolina by Season 10 A-2.3 Birding near Major Highways 11 A-3 Other Sources of Information 12 Part 8 — Site Information B-1 Abbeville County 14 B-1.1 Parsons Mountain, Sumter National Forest 14 B-1.2 Long Cane Natural Area, Sumter National Forest 15 B-1.3 Lowndesville Park on Lake Russell 16 13-2 Aiken County 16 B-2.1 Savannah River Bluffs Heritage Preserve 17 B-2.2 Aiken State Park and Vicinity 18 B-2.3 Hitchcock Woods in the Clty of Aiken 19 B-2.4 Beech Island to Silver Bluff 20 B-3 Allendale County 22 B-3.1 A Savannah River Tour (North of US 301) 22 B-3.2 A Savannah River Tour (South of US 301) 24 B-4 Anderson -
A Catawba-Wateree River Case Study
Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses May 2020 What Elements and Preconditions Are Necessary for a Viable, Adaptive Compact? A Catawba-Wateree River Case Study Brennan Williams Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Recommended Citation Williams, Brennan, "What Elements and Preconditions Are Necessary for a Viable, Adaptive Compact? A Catawba-Wateree River Case Study" (2020). All Theses. 3342. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/3342 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WHAT ELEMENTS AND PRECONDITIONS ARE NECESSARY FOR A VIABLE, ADAPTIVE COMPACT? A CATAWBA-WATEREE RIVER CASE STUDY A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of City and Regional Planning by Brennan Thomas Williams May 2020 Accepted by: Dr. Caitlin Dyckman, Committee Chair Dr. Barry Nocks Dr. Timothy Green 1 ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to determine the elements and preconditions necessary for a viable, adaptive water compact particularly with climate change. Legal and scientific scholars generally agree interstate water compacts are the solution to transboundary water resource governance. Earlier water compacts in the west tend to resolve the issue of water allocation (McCormick, 1994). This research suggests which elements are necessary for a viable interstate that addresses climate change. The elements derive from scholarly writings. Then, using semi-structured interviews, I answer whether the elements are present in a setting with a contentious history over an integral water resource between two states. -
Water from the Catawba River. Bill of Compl., Prayer for Relief, 1 2
Whether the Court should grant South Carolina leave to file a Bill of Complaint seeking equitable apportionment of the waters of the Catawba River given that: (1) the flow of the Catawba River into South Carolina is currently being addressed in proceedings before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and (2) the Bill of Complaint does not identify any threatened invasion of South Carolina's rights. TABLE OF CONTENTS QUESTION PRESENTED .................... i ... TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .................. 111 JURISDICTION ........................... 1 STATEMENT ............................. 1 SUlMlMAR,Y OF ARGUMENT ................. 8 ARGUMENT .............................i 10 I. PROCEEDINGS CURRENTLY BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WILLDETERMINE THE WATER FLOW OF THE CATAWBA RIVER INTO SOUTH CAROLINA. .... 11 11. SOUTH CAROLINA HAS NOT DEMONSTRATED A THREATENED INVASION OF ITS RIGHTS. ........ 17 CONCLUSION ........................... 21 APPENDIX Fransen Declaration .................... la Hiatt Declaration ..................... 22a Legg Declaration ...................... 30a Morris Declaration .................... 38a Reed Declaration ...................... 53a Attachment A: Excerpts from Appendix C: Low Idow Protocol (LIP) for the Catawba- Wateree Project ............... 62a TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES California v. Texas, 457 U.S. 164 (1982) ..................... 11 Illinois v. City of Milwaukee, 406 U.S. 91 (1972)...................... 11 Louisiana v. Texas, 176 U.S. l(1900)....................... 11 Mississippi v. Louisiana, 506 U.S. 73 (1992) ................ 10, 11, 15 Nebraska v. Wyoming, 515 U.S. 1 (1995) .................... 10,20 Texas v. New Mexico, 462 U.S. 554 (1983) ..................... 10 Wyoming v. Oklahoma, 502 U.S. 437 (1992) .................. 10, 11 U.S. CONSTITUTION AND L FEDERAL STATUTES U.S. Const. art. 111, 5 2 . 1, 10 STATE STATUTES N.C. Const. art. 11, 5 22 . 5 N.C. Gen. Stat. 5 143-215.221 . -
General Description Surface Water Quality
03050104-01 (Wateree River/Lake Wateree) General Description Watershed 03050104-01 (formerly 03050104-010, 020) is located in Fairfield, Lancaster, and Kershaw Counties and consists primarily of the Wateree River and its tributaries from Big Wateree Creek to the Lake Wateree dam. The watershed occupies 246,371 acres of the Piedmont region of South Carolina. Land use/land cover in the watershed includes: 78.1% forested land, 10.6% agricultural land, 5.1% water, 3.3% urban land, 2.0% forested wetland (swamp), and 0.9% barren land. The Catawba River flows out of the Cedar Creek Dam and is joined by Cedar Creek (Bell Branch, Rocky Creek, Gar Creek), McDowell Creek, Crooked Creek, and Big Wateree Creek (Wall Creek, Willow Swamp Branch, Gaydens Creek, Scabber Branch, Hogfork Branch, Little Wateree Creek). The confluence with Big Wateree Creek forms the headwaters of the Wateree River and Lake Wateree. Duke Power Company oversees operation of Lake Wateree, which is used for power generation, water supply, and recreational purposes. Little Wateree Creek originates near the Town of Winnsboro and accepts drainage from Horse Creek, McCulley Creek, Ready Creek, Minton Creek (White Oak Branch), and Horse Branch before flowing into the Big Wateree Creek arm of Lake Wateree. Langley Branch enters the lake just downstream of the confluence, followed by Taylor Creek, Dutchmans Creek (Cedar Fork, Lots Fork), and Singleton Creek (McDow Creek, Rocky Branch). Moving downlake, the lake accepts drainage from Rochelle Creek, June Creek, Fox Creek, Beaver Creek (Tranham Creek, Showerbath Branch, Little Beaver Creek), Stillhouse Branch, Colonel Creek, and White Oak Creek. -
Environmental Report
Environmental Report for Docket Number 50/395 License Number NPF-12 VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION APPLICATION FOR RENEWED OPERATING LICENSE APPENDIX E - ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................... AA-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Purpose and Need For Action.................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Environmental Scope and Methodology.................................................................. 1-2 1.3 V. C. Summer Nuclear Station Licensee and Ownership ........................................ 1-3 1.4 References................................................................................................................ 1-4 2.0 SITE AND ENVIRONMENTAL INTERFACES................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Location and Features.............................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Aquatic and Riparian Ecological Communities....................................................... 2-2 2.3 Groundwater Resources........................................................................................... 2-10 2.4 Critical and Important Terrestrial Habitats .............................................................. 2-12 2.5 Threatened or Endangered Species......................................................................... -
2018 Engineering Excellence Awards
2018 Engineering Excellence Awards 2017 2015 2016 Tuesday February 6, 2018 Columbia Museum of Art ENGINEERING EXCELLENCE AWARDS Engineering Excellence is an annual competition sponsored by the American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC) and its member organizations. It recognizes engineering achievements which demonstrate the highest degree of merit and ingenuity. The ACEC-SC Palmetto Award (top overall project) and the five other entries judged to be the best overall were eligible to enter the national competition. National winners are announced in April at a gala event in Washington, D.C. The ACEC-SC competition is open to all firms engaged in the practice of consulting engineering. Projects must have been designed in the state of South Carolina with construction substantially completed between Nov. 1, 2015 and Oct. 31, 2017. Projects could have been constructed anywhere in the world as long as they were designed in South Carolina. A distinguished panel of judges was selected. Each judge separately reviewed the projects. Criteria for judging included: original or innovative application of new or existing techniques; future value to the engineering profession and perception by the public; social, economic and sustainable design considerations; complexity; and exceeding owner/client needs. We applaud and congratulate all the firms that entered the 2018 Engineering Excellence Awards Competition. PALMETTO AWARD A C E C F Thomas & Hutton Engineering Co. i n a l i s Driving Economic Growth in South Carolina t Berkeley County Special Projects Over $10 Million ACEC FINALIST · ENGINEERING EXCELLENCE AWARD In 2015, Volvo announced the construction of its first American manufacturing plant in Berkeley County, South Carolina. -
Santee Basin Diadromous Fish Restoration Plan
SANTEE BASIN DIADROMOUS FISH RESTORATION PLAN PREPARED BY: NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE NORTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE RESOURCES COMMISSION SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE 2017 1 | Page Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS --------------------------------------------------------------- 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 I. Introduction ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 A. Need for a Plan --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11 B. Santee Basin Description ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12 C. Santee River Basin Historical Perspective -------------------------------------------------------- 23 D. Santee Basin Diadromous Fish Accord ------------------------------------------------------------ 26 E. Review of Migration Barriers ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 32 II. Fishes Targeted for Restoration and Their Current Status ----------------------------------- 36 A. Atlantic Sturgeon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 36 B. Shortnose Sturgeon ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 38 C. American Eel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -
South Carolina Boating Facilities Guide
South Carolina Boating Facilities Guide 2002 A county by county list of public boating facilities in South Carolina. The South Carolina Department of Natural Resources Engineering Section Page 2 Boating Facilities Guide Introduction The construction of new public boat landings and improvements to public landings across South Carolina makes launching and loading boats more convenient for the thousands of recreational boat- ers, anglers, hunters, and nature enthusiasts who venture onto the state’s public waterways and coastal waters. Many facilities listed here contain features to provide handicapped access, such as van accessible parking and barrier-free fishing access. This document is a county by county summary of public boat landings and includes all the public boat- ing access facilities on the state’s navigable streams, rivers, lakes, reservoirs and coastal waters that have been constructed, upgraded or repaired with engineering consultation by the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources over the past 25 years. Boat Landing Details For each public landing, the information includes: specific road directions to the location, the body of water it is situated on and the main features of the landing, such as number of launching ramps, any restrooms, and parking capacity. The latitude and longitude are included for many landings, but they are approximate coordinates and should not be used for navigational purposes. The road directions should be used. Boat Landing Maintenance Maintenance authority for each public boat landing will vary by county and sometimes by landing. Most landings have a local group that monitors litter problems. Boat Landing Funding The construction and upgrading of public boating accesses is funded primarily by the Water Recrea- tion Resource Fund, which is derived from a portion of the state gas tax and are earmarked for im- proving use and accessibility to the state’s public waterways. -
Villages on Mill Street
A MARKET FEASIBILITY STUDY OF: THE VILLAGES ON MILL STREET A MARKET FEASIBILITY STUDY OF: THE VILLAGES ON MILL STREET 1000 Mill Street Camden, Kershaw County, South Carolina 29020 Effective Date: February 17, 2019 Report Date: March 3, 2019 Prepared for: Mr. Josh Thomason Principal Piedmont Housing Group 295 West Crossville Road Roswell, Georgia 30075 Prepared by: Novogradac & Company LLP 2325 Lakeview Parkway, Suite 450 Alpharetta, GA 30009 678-867-2333 March 3, 2019 Mr. Josh Thomason Principal Piedmont Housing Group 295 West Crossville Road Roswell, GA 30075 Re: Market Study for Villages on Mill Street, located in Camden, South Carolina Dear Mr. Thomason: At your request, Novogradac & Company LLP has performed a study of the multifamily rental market in the Camden, Kershaw County, South Carolina area relative to the above-referenced Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) project known as Villages on Mill Street, (the Subject). We concurrently completed a land appraisal for the Subject property. We have completed no additional work pertaining to the Subject over the three-year period preceding this engagement. The purpose of this market study is to assess the viability of Villages at Mill Street, a proposed 50- unit LIHTC project. The property will be a newly constructed affordable LIHTC project, with 50 units restricted to households earning 50 and 60 percent of the Area Median Income (AMI) or less. The following report provides support for the findings of the study and outlines the sources of information and the methodologies used to arrive at these conclusions. The scope of this report meets the requirements of the South Carolina State Housing Finance and Development Agency (SCSHFDA), including the following: . -
Supplementary Bird List
Supplementary Bird List e Supplementary Bird List addresses all birds documented in the Central Carolinas which have never been conrmed in Mecklenburg County, the county that lies at the heart of the region. ese birds are primarily of accidental, casual, or very rare occurrence, and all but one of them have been recorded in four or fewer counties in the region. Two species, the Rued Grouse and the Red-cockaded Woodpecker, are on the edge of their breeding range. One, the Scissor-tailed Flycatcher, has recently become a sporadic breeding bird here. ere are currently 36 species on the Supplementary List. Anatidae: the WHISTLING DUCKS, GEESE, SWANS, DUCKS Carolina. Today, biologists are banding many wild-born whistling-ducks in South Carolina in an eort to help Black-bellied Whistling-Duck Dendrocygna autumnalis conrm where these birds disperse aer the breeding e Black-bellied Whistling-Duck, formerly known as the season. Black-bellied Tree Duck, is actually taxonomically more closely related to geese than ducks. ese unique water Greater White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons birds truly do make a high-pitched “wheezy” whistle, and e Greater White-fronted Goose was once known as the they prefer to nest in tree cavities. Black-bellied Whistling “Speckle-belly.” It is a bird that breeds in the Arctic and Ducks historically bred primarily around freshwater generally winters along the Gulf Coast from Louisiana marshes and impoundments in Mexico, southern Texas, southward. In 1932, H.H. Brimley, Curator at the North and along the Gulf Coast of Texas and Louisiana. Carolina State Museum, opened a parcel he received in the Black-bellied Whistling-Ducks have oen been kept in mail and found the remains of a Greater White-fronted captivity, and until the turn of the twenty-rst century, Goose inside. -
Parr Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR HYDROPOWER LICENSE Parr Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No. 1894-211 South Carolina Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Office of Energy Projects Division of Hydropower Licensing 888 First Street, NE Washington, D.C. 20426 April 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................................... i LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................ iv LIST OF TABLES.............................................................................................................. iv ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS.......................................................................... vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ ix 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 1 1.1 APPLICATION ............................................................................................. 1 1.2 PURPOSE OF ACTION AND NEED FOR POWER .................................. 1 1.2.1 Purpose of Action ............................................................................... 1 1.2.2 Need for Power ................................................................................... 3 1.3 STATUTORY AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS ......................... 4 1.3.1 Federal Power Act .............................................................................