DOCSLIB.ORG

The Effect of Scleral Buckling on Accommodative Amplitude

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Effect of Scleral Buckling on Accommodative Amplitude Ebrahimiadib et al. Int J Retin Vitr (2020) 6:14 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-020-00218-z International Journal of Retina and Vitreous ORIGINAL ARTICLE Open Access The efect of scleral buckling on accommodative amplitude Nazanin Ebrahimiadib1, Narges Hassanpoor1,2,4*, Mohammadreza Niyousha2 and Bobeck Seyed Modjtahedi3 Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the efect of scleral buckling on accommodative amplitude. Design: Non-randomized, prospective, double masked clinical trial in which the fellow eye of patients undergoing scleral buckling served as a control. Methods: Patients who underwent scleral bucking for the management of retinal detachment in at least one eye were enrolled. Accommodative amplitude was measured monocularly 1 month and 3 months post operatively by two masked optometrists using a near-point “push” technique and minus-to-blur technique. Accommodative amplitude in eyes that underwent scleral buckle surgery were compared to their fellow eyes. Buckle type, buckle loca- tion, lens status and age were analyzed. Generalized Estimation Equations (GEE) were used to compare means and percentages between two groups. Results: Seventy-four eyes of 37 patients were included in the study. Median age was 44 years old (range: 31–67 years old) and 68.4% of patients were male (n 24). Two patients required bilateral surgery. Thirty-six of 39 operated eyes (92.3%) were phakic and three were pseudophakic.= In phakic eyes there was a signifcantly higher amplitude of accommodation in operated eyes compared to their fellow eyes at post-operative month one (0.99 diopters, p value 0.002) and three (1.17 diopters, p value 0.001). The diference in accommodative amplitude in post-operative eyes= compared to control eyes did not reach= statistical signifcance in pseudophakic eyes nor did it difer between those who had an encircling band and those with a segmental buckle at both one and 3 months after surgery (p value 0.37 and 0.38, respectively). In those with a segmental buckle, inferior fxation resulted in a larger diference in accommodative= amplitude compared to control eyes than any other location fxation. Age under 40 years old and better post-operative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) both correlated with greater diference in accommodative amplitude compared to fellow eyes. Conclusion: Compared to fellow eyes not undergoing surgery, those eyes that underwent scleral buckling had a greater accommodative amplitude with larger diferences correlating with better post-operative BCVA and younger age. Keywords: Scleral expansion, Presbyopia, Accommodation, Buckling, Encircling band, Retinal detachment Introduction by Von Helmholz [1, 2] while pulling of the lens equator Te mechanisms responsible for accommodation remain towards the sclera by equatorial zonuleshas also been the- incompletely understood. Contraction of the ciliary mus- orized to induce accomodation [3–6] Attempts manipu- cles resulting in phakic lens steepening was proposed late the sclera to treat presbyopia have evolved and are gaining increasing attention. Tese eforts include scleral expansion including with implantation of band segments *Correspondence: [email protected] 4 Eye Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Qazvin Square, Tehran, Iran of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) which Qazi et al. Full list of author information is available at the end of the article found resulted in modest increases in accommodative © The Author(s) 2020. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creat iveco mmons .org/licen ses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creat iveco mmons .org/publi cdoma in/ zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. Ebrahimiadib et al. Int J Retin Vitr (2020) 6:14 Page 2 of 5 amplitude [1]. Scleral buckling similarly results in expan- surgeon. Segmental buckles covered at least 180 degrees sion of the sclera. Although myopic shifts following scle- of the sclera in most cases. ral buckling surgery are well characterized, less is known Written informed consent was acquired by patients about the efect of this surgery on accommodation. prior to enrollment to the study. Te study adhered to Tis study sought to characterize diferences in accom- the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and Institutional modative amplitude following scleral buckling surgery in Review Board (IRB) approval was attained from the Teh- patients undergoing retinal detachment repair. ran University of Medical Sciences. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS soft- ware (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0., Patients and methods Armonk, NY: IBM Corporation). Descriptive statis- Patients who underwent scleral buckling surgery for reti- tics were used to evaluate the distribution of the data. nal detachment repair in at least one eye between July 1, Continuous data with normal distribution were given 2018 and June 1, 2019 were included in this prospective as mean ± standard deviation or median. Both eyes study. All patients underwent complete ophthalmic eval- of one subject in this paper were included which may uations including manifest refraction post-operatively as cause errors using usual T test analyses considering the well as detailed examinations of the anterior and poste- dependency between two eyes in one subject. Tere- rior segments both pre- and post-operatively. Accom- fore, the other statistical analyses were carried out using modative amplitude was measured monocularly in all STATA software version 14.0 (StataCorp, College Station, patients by both near-point “push” technique and minus- Texas, USA). Generalized estimation equations (GEE) to-blur technique at post-operative months one and were used to compare means and percentages between three [1, 6]. Examinations were independently conducted two groups. A p value of 0.05 or less was considered sta- by two masked optometrists. All patients discontinued tistically signifcant. cycloplegic drugs at least 14 days before assessment of accommodative amplitudes. After evaluation of inter- Results rater agreement level, the mean of both measurements Tirty-seven patients underwent scleral buckling and of accommodative amplitude was used for analysis. Two were included in this study. Tere were 39 eyes in the patients underwent bilateral scleral buckling surgery due buckling group and 35 eyes in the control group (n = 74). to bilateral retinal detachment. Fellow eyes of patients Two patients underwent bilateral scleral buckling and with unilateral surgeries (35 eyes) served as the control both of their eyes were included in the analysis: both in this study. Due to including both eyes of bilateral cases patients were bilaterally phakic with one macula of reti- in the “case” group, we have more study eyes than control nal detachment and one macula on retinal detachment. eyes in this paper. Patients’ age ranged from 31 to 67-years-old (Median: Patients were classifed based on age, lens status, buckle 44). Twenty-four patients (64.8%) were male. Tirty-six type (encircling versus segmental), and buckle location in of 39 eyes in the scleral buckle group (92.3%) were phakic the case of segmental buckles. and 3 eyes (7.7%) were pseudophakic. Patients with a history of prior ocular surgeries (other Level of inter-rater agreement for measurements of than cataract extraction), prior ocular history other than accomodative amplitude were strong (Kappa: 0.83). refractive error, diferent phakic status in each eye, best In phakic eyes, there was a statistically signifcantly corrected visual acuity (BCVA) less than 0.6 logMAR in greater diference in accommodative amplitude com- the fellow eye, 1 month post-operative BCVA less than pared to fellow non-operated eyes at 1 month (0.99 1.0 logMAR in operated eye, failure of primary scleral diopters, p value = 0.002) and 3 months (1.17 diopters, buckle repair, history of diabetes mellitus and/or neuro- p value = 0.001) post-operatively (Tables 1 and 2). Pseu- logic disease that can cause accommodation disability, dophakic eyes did not show a signifcant diference in inability to participate in subjective visual tests, or use accommodative amplitude when compared to control of any topical or systemic medication that could impact eyes (p value = 0.86). accommodation within 2 weeks of measurements. Patients who underwent encircling (band or tire) or Scleral buckles were secured to the scleral using par- segmental buckles (sponge) both had a statistically sig- tial thickness passes of 5–0 mersilene sutures. Te type nifcantly higher accommodative amplitude compared to of buckle and the decision between encircling versus control eyes at one month (p = 0.04 and p = 0.03, respec- segmental buckles were done at the discretion of the tively) and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Accommodation in the Holmes-Adie Syndrome by G
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.21.4.290 on 1 November 1958. Downloaded from J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 1958, 21, 290. ACCOMMODATION IN THE HOLMES-ADIE SYNDROME BY G. F. M. RUSSELL From the Neurological Research Unit, the National Hospital, Queen Square, London In 1936, Bramwell suggested that the title response to near and far vision respectively. But it "Holmes-Adie syndrome" be given to the clinical has also been noted that the reaction to convergence complex of a slowly reacting pupil and absent tendon may be remarkably wide in its range, considering reflexes in recognition of the descriptions by Holmes that it often follows a stage of complete paralysis (1931) and Adie (1932). Both authors had empha- (Strasburger, 1902). Not only is the reaction to sized the chief clinical features-dilatation of the convergence well preserved when compared to the pupil, apparent loss of the reaction to light, slow reaction to light, but it may in fact be excessive constriction and relaxation in response to near and (Alajouanine and Morax, 1938; Heersema and distant vision, and partial loss of the tendon reflexes. Moersch, 1939). In assessing the degree of tonicity Although the syndrome had been recognized wholly there are, therefore, two criteria: slowness ofguest. Protected by copyright. or in part many years previously (Strasburger, 1902; pupillary movement and preservation of the range Saenger, 1902; Nonne, 1902; Markus, 1906; Weill of movement. and Reys, 1926), credit must go to Adie for stressing Adler and Scheie (1940) showed that the tonic the benign nature of the disorder and distinguishing pupil constricts after the conjunctival instillation it clearly from neurosyphilis.
    [Show full text]
  • Asymmetries of Dark and Bright Negative Afterimages Are Paralleled by Subcortical on and OFF Poststimulus Responses
    1984 • The Journal of Neuroscience, February 22, 2017 • 37(8):1984–1996 Systems/Circuits Asymmetries of Dark and Bright Negative Afterimages Are Paralleled by Subcortical ON and OFF Poststimulus Responses X Hui Li,1,2 X Xu Liu,1,2 X Ian M. Andolina,1 Xiaohong Li,1 Yiliang Lu,1 Lothar Spillmann,3 and Wei Wang1 1Institute of Neuroscience, State Key Laboratory of Neuroscience, Key Laboratory of Primate Neurobiology, Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China, 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China, and 3Department of Neurology, University of Freiburg, 79085 Freiburg, Germany Humans are more sensitive to luminance decrements than increments, as evidenced by lower thresholds and shorter latencies for dark stimuli. This asymmetry is consistent with results of neurophysiological recordings in dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) and primary visual cortex (V1) of cat and monkey. Specifically, V1 population responses demonstrate that darks elicit higher levels of activation than brights, and the latency of OFF responses in dLGN and V1 is shorter than that of ON responses. The removal of a dark or bright disc often generates the perception of a negative afterimage, and here we ask whether there also exist asymmetries for negative afterimages elicited by dark and bright discs. If so, do the poststimulus responses of subcortical ON and OFF cells parallel such afterimage asymmetries? To test these hypotheses, we performed psychophysical experiments in humans and single-cell/S-potential recordings in cat dLGN. Psychophysically, we found that bright afterimages elicited by luminance decrements are stronger and last longer than dark afterimages elicited by luminance increments of equal sizes.
    [Show full text]
  • Cone Contributions to Signals for Accommodation and the Relationship to Refractive Error
    Vision Research 46 (2006) 3079–3089 www.elsevier.com/locate/visres Cone contributions to signals for accommodation and the relationship to refractive error Frances J. Rucker ¤, Philip B. Kruger Schnurmacher Institute for Vision Research, State University of New York, State College of Optometry, 33 West 42nd Street, New York, NY 10036, USA Received 18 February 2005; received in revised form 7 April 2006 Abstract The accommodation response is sensitive to the chromatic properties of the stimulus, a sensitivity presumed to be related to making use of the longitudinal chromatic aberration of the eye to decode the sign of the defocus. Thus, the relative sensitivity to the long- (L) and middle-wavelength (M) cones may inXuence accommodation and may also be related to an individual’s refractive error. Accommodation was measured continuously while subjects viewed a sine wave grating (2.2 c/d) that had diVerent cone contrast ratios. Seven conditions tested loci that form a circle with equal vector length (0.27) at 0, 22.5, 45, 67.5, 90, 120, 145 deg. An eighth condition produced an empty Weld stimulus (CIE (x,y) co-ordinates (0.4554, 0.3835)). Each of the gratings moved at 0.2 Hz sinusoidally between 1.00 D and 3.00 D for 40 s, while the eVects of longitudinal chromatic aberration were neutralized with an achromatizing lens. Both the mean level of accommo- dation and the gain of the accommodative response, to sinusoidal movements of the stimulus, depended on the relative L and M cone sen- sitivity: Individuals more sensitive to L-cone stimulation showed a higher level of accommodation (p D 0.01; F D 12.05; ANOVA) and dynamic gain was higher for gratings with relatively more L-cone contrast.
    [Show full text]
  • Care of the Patient with Accommodative and Vergence Dysfunction
    OPTOMETRIC CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE Care of the Patient with Accommodative and Vergence Dysfunction OPTOMETRY: THE PRIMARY EYE CARE PROFESSION Doctors of optometry are independent primary health care providers who examine, diagnose, treat, and manage diseases and disorders of the visual system, the eye, and associated structures as well as diagnose related systemic conditions. Optometrists provide more than two-thirds of the primary eye care services in the United States. They are more widely distributed geographically than other eye care providers and are readily accessible for the delivery of eye and vision care services. There are approximately 36,000 full-time-equivalent doctors of optometry currently in practice in the United States. Optometrists practice in more than 6,500 communities across the United States, serving as the sole primary eye care providers in more than 3,500 communities. The mission of the profession of optometry is to fulfill the vision and eye care needs of the public through clinical care, research, and education, all of which enhance the quality of life. OPTOMETRIC CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE CARE OF THE PATIENT WITH ACCOMMODATIVE AND VERGENCE DYSFUNCTION Reference Guide for Clinicians Prepared by the American Optometric Association Consensus Panel on Care of the Patient with Accommodative and Vergence Dysfunction: Jeffrey S. Cooper, M.S., O.D., Principal Author Carole R. Burns, O.D. Susan A. Cotter, O.D. Kent M. Daum, O.D., Ph.D. John R. Griffin, M.S., O.D. Mitchell M. Scheiman, O.D. Revised by: Jeffrey S. Cooper, M.S., O.D. December 2010 Reviewed by the AOA Clinical Guidelines Coordinating Committee: David A.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Findings and Management of Posterior Vitreous Detachment
    American Academy of Optometry: Case Report 5 Clinical Findings and Management of Posterior Vitreous Detachment Candidate’s Name, O.D. Candidate’s Address Candidate’s Phone number Candidate’s email Abstract: A posterior vitreous detachment is a degenerative process associated with aging that affects the vitreous when the posterior vitreous cortex separates from the internal limiting membrane of the retina. The composition of the vitreous gel can degenerate two collective ways, including synchysis or liquefaction, and syneresis or shrinking. Commonly, this process of separation occurs with the posterior hyaloid resulting in a Weiss ring overlying the optic nerve. Complications of a posterior vitreous detachment may include retinal breaks or detachments, retinal or vitreous hemorrhages, or vitreomacular traction. This case presentation summarizes the etiology of this ocular condition as well as treatment and management approaches. Key Words: Posterior Vitreous Detachment, Weiss Ring, Vitreous Degeneration, Scleral Depression, Nd:YAG Laser 1 Introduction The vitreous humor encompasses the posterior segment of the eye and fills approximately three quarters of the ocular space.1 The vitreous is a transparent, hydrophilic, “gel-like” substance that is described as a dilute solution of collagen, and hyaluronic acid.2,3,4 It is composed of 98% to 99.7% water.4 As the eye matures, changes may occur regarding the structure and composition of the vitreous. The vitreous functions to provide support to the retina against the choroid, to store nutrients and metabolites for the retina and lens, to protect the retinal tissue by acting as a “shock absorber,” to transmit and refract light, and to help regulate eye growth during fetal development.3,4 Case Report Initial Visit (03/23/2018) A 59-year-old Asian female presented as a new patient for examination with a complaint of a new onset of floaters and flashes of light in her right eye.
    [Show full text]
  • Refractive Errors a Closer Look
    2011-2012 refractive errors a closer look WHAT ARE REFRACTIVE ERRORS? WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF REFRACTIVE ERRORS? In order for our eyes to be able to see, light rays must be bent or refracted by the cornea and the lens MYOPIA (NEARSIGHTEDNESS) so they can focus on the retina, the layer of light- sensitive cells lining the back of the eye. A myopic eye is longer than normal or has a cornea that is too steep. As a result, light rays focus in front of The retina receives the picture formed by these light the retina instead of on it. Close objects look clear but rays and sends the image to the brain through the distant objects appear blurred. optic nerve. Myopia is inherited and is often discovered in children A refractive error means that due to its shape, your when they are between ages eight and 12 years old. eye doesn’t refract the light properly, so the image you During the teenage years, when the body grows see is blurred. Although refractive errors are called rapidly, myopia may become worse. Between the eye disorders, they are not diseases. ages of 20 and 40, there is usually little change. If the myopia is mild, it is called low myopia. Severe myopia is known as high myopia. Lens Retina Cornea Lens Retina Cornea Light rays Light is focused onto the retina Light rays Light is focused In a normal eye, the cornea and lens focus light rays on in front of the retina the retina. In myopia, the eye is too long or the cornea is too steep.
    [Show full text]
  • Pupils and Near Vision
    PUPILS AND NEAR VISION Akilesh Gokul PhD Research Fellow Department of Ophthalmology Iris Anatomy Two muscles: • Radially oriented dilator (actually a myo-epithelium) - like the spokes of a wagon wheel • Sphincter/constrictor Pupillary Reflex • Size of pupil determined by balance between parasympathetic and sympathetic input • Parasympathetic constricts the pupil via sphincter muscle • Sympathetic dilates the pupil via dilator muscle • Response to light mediated by parasympathetic; • Increased innervation = pupil constriction • Decreased innervation = pupil dilation Parasympathetic Pathway 1. Three major divisions of neurons: • Afferent division 2. • Interneuron division • Efferent division Near response: • Convergence 3. • Accommodation • Pupillary constriction Pupil Light Parasympathetic – Afferent Pathway 1. • Retinal ganglion cells travel via the optic nerve leaving the optic tracts 2. before the LGB, and synapse in the pre-tectal nucleus. 3. Pupil Light Parasympathetic – Efferent Pathway 1. • Pre-tectal nucleus nerve fibres partially decussate to innervate both Edinger- 2. Westphal (EW) nuclei. • E-W nucleus to ipsilateral ciliary ganglion. Fibres travel via inferior division of III cranial nerve to ciliary ganglion via nerve to inferior oblique muscle. 3. • Ciliary ganglion via short ciliary nerves to innervate sphincter pupillae muscle. Near response: 1. Increased accommodation Pupil 2. Convergence 3. Pupillary constriction Sympathetic pathway • From hypothalamus uncrossed fibres 1. down brainstem to terminate in ciliospinal centre
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives on Presbyopia
    PERSPECTIVES ON PRESBYOPIA EXTRA CONTENT FOUR PATIENTS AVAILABLE FIVE EXPERTS BY MARY WADE, CONTRIBUTING WRITER ew presbyopia treatments, such as the corneal inlays Kamra and Raindrop, are slowly wending their way through the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval process. Entirely new approaches to intraocular lenses (IOLs) are in development internationally. Meanwhile,N patients arrive in your office daily, seeking better vision without reading glasses. What are the best treatments to offer them right now? EyeNet asked five leading refractive surgeons to review four hypothetical patients with pres- byopia or pre-presbyopia. The differing recommendations made by these clinicians illustrate the range of valid approaches. The surgeons emphasize that, in all cases, it’s critical to conduct a thorough assessment, talk with patients about their vision priorities, discuss the pros and cons of various approaches, and mention the option of “watchful waiting”—that is, forgoing treatment for the time being. When patients are considering corrective surgery, one of the surgeon’s most important tasks is to help them form realistic expectations regarding visual outcomes and possible complications. (See “Counseling Caveats.”) For those patients who choose to pursue vision correction surgery, the perspectives presented by these refractive experts can help to guide treatment choices with today’s technologies. BONNIE A. HENDERSON, MD KEVIN M. MILLER, MD J. BRADLEY RANDLEMAN, MD STEVEN I. ROSENFELD, MD, FACS SONIA H. YOO, MD ALFRED T. KAMAJIAN T. ALFRED eyenet 37 eventually need cataract surgery, prior refractive surgery may make accurate refraction difficult and constrain lens choices. It makes sense to leave the corneas pristine in older patients.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Multiple Mechanisms of Accommodation A. Variable Axial Length B
    Mechanics, Aging and Neurological Control of accommodation: I. Multiple Mechanisms of Accommodation A. Variable axial length B. Corneal Power C. Lenticular power D. Pupil size E. Lenticular refractive index gradient (isoindical surfaces) II. Anatomy A. Lens B. Capsule C. Zonules D. Ciliary Body E. Index gradient III. Autonomic innervation IV. Amplitude of accommodation and age A. Functional presbyopia B. Absolute presbyopia C. Treatment Bifocals Monovision Surgically implanted prosthesis Course title - (VS217) Oculomotor functions and neurology Instructor - Clifton Schor GSI: James O’Shea, Michael Oliver & Aleks Polosukhina Schedule of lectures, exams and laboratories : Lecture hours 10-11:30 Tu Th; 5 min break at 11:00 Labs Friday the first 3 weeks Examination Schedule : Quizes: January 29; February 28 Midterm: February 14: Final March 13 Power point lecture slides are available on a CD Resources: text books, reader , website, handouts Class Website: Reader. Website http://schorlab.berkeley.edu Click courses 117 class page name VS117 password Hering,1 First Week: read chapters 16-18 See lecture outline in syllabus Labs begin this Friday, January 25 Course Goals Near Response - Current developments in optometry Myopia control – environmental, surgical, pharmaceutical and genetic Presbyopia treatment – amelioration and prosthetic treatment Developmental disorders (amblyopia and strabismus) Reading disorders Ergonomics- computers and sports vision Virtual reality and personal computer eye-ware Neurology screening- Primary care gate keeper neurology, systemic, endocrines, metabolic, muscular skeletal systems. Mechanics, Aging and Neurological Control of accommodation : I. Five Mechanisms of Accommodation A. Variable axial length B. Corneal Power and astigmatism C. Lenticular power D. Pupil size & Aberrations E. Lenticular refractive index gradient (isoindical surfaces) II.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Impact of Presbyopia on Quality of Life in the Developing and Developed World
    Acta Ophthalmologica 2014 Review Article Review of the impact of presbyopia on quality of life in the developing and developed world Ariana D. Goertz,1 William C. Stewart,2 William R. Burns,3 Jeanette A. Stewart2 and Lindsay A. Nelson2 1University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA 2PRN Pharmaceutical Research Network, LLC, Cheyenne, Wyoming, USA 3Encore Vision, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas, USA ABSTRACT. (Barbero 2013). Everyone eventually Purpose: To examine the public health impact of presbyopia regarding its effect develops presbyopia but symptoms on quality of life (QoL) and society in both the developed and developing worlds. may vary. The major risk factor for Methods: A database was created from articles found on PubMed, the Cochrane presbyopia is age although the condi- Library and Science Direct using the following search terms: presbyopia, QoL, tion may be affected by other factors accommodation, impact, cost, prevention, treatment and public health. Articles including disease, trauma and medica- were accepted into the database if they addressed presbyopia and public health. tions (American Optometric Associa- Results: This study showed in the developed world presbyopic subjects treated tion 2010). with reading glasses suffered a reduction in QoL parameters compared with Presbyopia is classically believed to those who were younger and emmetropic. A small minority of subjects were result from hardening of the lens although other causes have been assessed to be a candidate for additional non-spectacle treatment measures. In described as well such as changes in undeveloped areas, the manifestations of presbyopia were similar to the tissue elasticity and the ciliary body developed world in symptoms, age and reduced QoL.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Presbyopia and Its Correction in Its Correction and of Presbyopia Impact Copyright © 2018 Asia-Pacific Academy of Ophthalmology
    REVIEW ARTICLE Impact of Presbyopia and Its Correction in Low- and Middle-Income Countries Ving Fai Chan, MSc, PhD,* Graeme E. MacKenzie, DPhil,† Jordan Kassalow, OD, MPH,‡§ Ella Gudwin, MA,‡ and Nathan Congdon, MD, MPH¶ǁ** 10,11 07/24/2019 on BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3XLe684GKHSUkTaSrkQQMT2tZTRYsAPrCn1WjGM14MXk= by https://journals.lww.com/apjoo from Downloaded Abstract: Presbyopia affects more than 1 billion people worldwide, of presbyopic correction with glasses are as low as 10%. The prevalence of presbyopia in LMICs ranges from 43.8% Downloaded and the number is growing rapidly due to the aging global population. 10,12–39 Uncorrected presbyopia is the world’s leading cause of vision impair- to 93.4%. However, most of these studies are of somewhat limited value in understanding the burden of presbyopia, as they from ment, and as with other causes. The burden falls unfairly on low- and https://journals.lww.com/apjoo middle-income countries (LMICs), in which rates of presbyopic correc- largely focus on distance vision, few were population-based, and tion are as low as 10%. The importance of presbyopia as a cause of vision definitions of disease and age group cut-offs also vary. impairment is further underscored by the fact that it strikes at the heart The definition of presbyopia is also potentially problematic. 10,16–19,40,41 of the productive working years, although it can be safely and effectively Many studies define NVI as uncorrected bilateral near treated with a pair of inexpensive glasses. To galvanize action for pro- visual acuity (NVA) worse than N6 or N8 at 40 cm (the 40 cm by BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3XLe684GKHSUkTaSrkQQMT2tZTRYsAPrCn1WjGM14MXk= grams to address uncorrected presbyopia in the workplace and beyond equivalent of less than or equal to 6/12 and 6/15, respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Presbyopia Presbyopia Is a Common Type of Vision Disorder That Occurs As You Age
    National Eye Institute Eye Institute National Institutes Institutes of Health of Health Presbyopia Presbyopia is a common type of vision disorder that occurs as you age. It is often referred to as the aging eye condition. Presbyopia results in the inability to focus up close, a problem associated with refraction in the eye. What is presbyopia? Presbyopia is a common type of vision disorder that occurs as you age. It is often referred to as the aging eye condition. Presbyopia results in the inability to focus up close, a problem associated with refraction in the eye. Can I have presbyopia and another type of refractive error at the same time? Yes. It is common to have presbyopia and another type of refractive error at the same time. There are several other types of refractive errors: myopia (nearsightedness), hyperopia (farsightedness), and astigmatism. An individual may have one type of refractive error in one eye and a different type of refractive error in the other. Presbyopia 1 What is refraction? Refraction is the bending of light as it passes through one object to another. Vision occurs when light rays are bent (refracted) by the cornea and lens. The light is then focused directly on the retina, which is a light-sensitive tissue at the back of the eye. The retina converts the light-rays into messages that are sent through the optic nerve to the brain. The brain interprets these messages into the images we see. How does presbyopia occur? Presbyopia happens naturally in people as they age. The eye is not able to focus light directly on to the retina due to the hardening of the natural lens.
    [Show full text]