Kinematic Traits of an Elite Paralympic Karateka: a Case Study
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA Kinematic traits of an elite Paralympic karateka: a case study Journal: The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness Paper code: J Sports Med Phys Fitness-10141 Submission date: July 1, 2019 Article type: Case Report Files: 1. Reply letter to comments on the manuscript Version: 3 Description: Reply to reviewers File format: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document 2. Manuscript Version: 2 Description: manoscritto revisionato File format: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document 3. Figures 1 Version: 2 Description: figura 1 File format: image/jpeg 4. Figures 2 Version: 2 Description: figura 2 File format: image/jpeg EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA Page 1 of 31 1 Milan, November 22nd, 2019 2 3 Dr. Alberto Oliaro 4 Editor 5 6 The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 7 8 9 Dear Dr. Oliaro, 10 11 12 Please find enclosed the revised version of the manuscript J Sports Med Phys Fitness-10141 13 14 entitled “Kinematic traits of an elite Paralympic karateka: a case study.” 15 16 17 We thoroughly considered all the comments of the Reviewers, and we revised the current 18 19 version of the manuscript. In the following, we provide a description of the changes introduced, 20 which are also highlighted in the manuscript. 21 22 23 24 We would like to thank you and the Reviewers for the time and expertise devoted to 25 improving the quality of our manuscript. I trust that this revised version will be suitable for 26 27 publication in The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 28 29 30 Best regards, 31 32 33 Chiarella Sforza 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 Page 2 of 31 1 2 3 # Reviewer 1 4 R1.1 Major corrections (main criticisms) 5 6 Here are several major concerns: (1) The participant performed a traditional Shotokan 7 8 karate – KATA which is a standardized sequence of karate movements. The some 9 parameters from CoM and knee were analyzed. Those parameters are critical factors to 10 11 KATA? It needs solid evidence-based support. 12 13 We would like to thank the Reviewer for his/her precious suggestions. 14 We thoroughly reconsidered the main passages of the Discussion and Introduction, as 15 16 marked in the text. As suggested, we added in the Introduction a paragraph containing 17 information about the critical factors for Kata performance, that on a biomechanical 18 19 perspective include also those mentioned by the Reviewer. These data are supported by 20 21 previously published studies. 22 23 24 R1.2 (2) Those parameters were analyzed from which karate movement of KATA? which 25 26 movement phase? 27 We agree that the data extraction flow was not clear and we thank the Reviewer for the 28 29 chance to clarify this point. We now added details about the computation of kinematic 30 31 data in the Procedures section. Moreover, we added in the Discussion some features 32 regarding relevant outcomes for knee kinematics in particular step of the sequence. 33 34 35 36 R1.3 (3) Kumite and Kata are two types of karate. The scoring requirements and critical 37 factors are very different between Kumite and Kata. However, some literatures on 38 39 Kumite also cited in the discussion. 40 41 The point raised by the Reviewer is correct. However, the studies we included 42 addressed both kata and kumite athletes (references #2 and #5) in order to highlight 43 44 the relevance of dynamic postural control during the execution karate techniques. In 45 such papers, the importance of the achievement of a adequate technique (also in terms 46 47 of biomechanical parameters) is addressed, and its role in the obtainment of a high-level 48 49 performance is discussed. 50 51 52 # Reviewer 2 53 54 Major corrections (main criticisms) 55 Page 3 of 31 1 R2.1 The usage of expressions as “reduced” or “decreased” (see detailed comments) are 2 3 inappropriate and should be replaced throughout. However, I feel some speculations on 4 practical consequences or specific recommendations would enhance the value for the 5 6 reader. All the areas where the manuscript needs further improvement have been 7 8 pointed in the specific comments. 9 We would like to thank the Reviewer for his/her precious suggestions. We thoroughly 10 11 checked the manuscript and clarified all the potentially misleading expressions. 12 13 As prompted by this suggestion, we also added some practical outcomes and 14 recommendations that could provide useful insights for the reader. 15 16 17 R2.2 Minor corrections (page, paragraph, line where the author must make the 18 19 corrections) 20 21 Page 2, Line 7: replace “study is” with “study was” 22 Fixed as suggested by the Reviewer. 23 24 25 26 R2.3 Page 2, Line 16: Please delete “traditional”. 27 This word was deleted as suggested by the Reviewer. 28 29 30 31 R2.4 Page 2, Line 16: Please delete “Shotokan” (doubling). 32 Thank you for noticing the typo. We deleted the doubling. 33 34 35 36 R2.5 Page 2, Line 20: replace “more” with “longer” 37 Corrected as suggested by the Reviewer. 38 39 40 41 R2.5 Page 2, Line 22: replace “decreased” with “lower” 42 Corrected as suggested by the Reviewer. 43 44 45 R2.6 Page 2, Line 27: replace “reduced” with “lower” 46 47 Corrected as suggested by the Reviewer. 48 49 50 R2.7 Page 3, Line 9: change “incoming” into “upcoming” 51 52 Changed as suggested by the Reviewer. 53 54 55 Page 4 of 31 1 R2.8 Page 3, Line 12: change “involving a sequence” into “involving sequences” 2 3 Changed as suggested by the Reviewer. 4 5 6 R2.9 Page 3, Lines 28-30: This is also true for the non-paralympic games, I guess. 7 8 The point raised by the Reviewer is correct. We focused only on the Paralympic Program 9 to highlight the lack of international recognition for top level competitions of para- 10 11 karate. However, if the Reviewer believes that adding a reference to able-bodied 12 13 competitions should clarify the context for the reader, we are open to add more details. 14 15 16 R2.10 Page 3, Line 53: change “Participants” into “Participant” 17 We made the change as suggested by the Reviewer. 18 19 20 21 R2.11 Page 4, Lines 14-16: What does “5/6” or “3/4” mean in this context? 22 The Paralympic karateka trained 5 to 6 times per week before and 3 to 4 times per week 23 24 after the operations. We agreed that there was a lack of clarity. We clarified this 25 26 sentence by replacing “/” with “to”. 27 28 29 R2.12 Page 4, Line 29: Which kata was performed? 30 31 As stated, the kata was the same of the previous study (reference #14) taken as a 32 comparison with able-bodied athletes. We intentionally didn’t report the entire 33 34 sequence of movements to avoid redundancy. However, if the Reviewer believes that 35 36 adding the description of the whole sequence of movement should be useful for the 37 reader, we are available to add the details of kata performed. 38 39 40 41 R2.13 Page 4, Line 37: What does “advancement” means? “in front”? “forwards”? 42 We acknowledge that passage was not as clear as we intended. We added “forward” 43 44 before “advancement” to clarify the direction of the movement. 45 46 47 R2.14 Page 5, Line 43: replace “reduced” with “lower” 48 49 Replaced as suggested by the Reviewer. 50 51 52 R2.15 Page 6, Line 29: replace “decreased” with “was lower” 53 54 Replaced as suggested by the Reviewer. 55 Page 5 of 31 1 2 3 R2.16 Page 7, Line 13: What does “decreasing” mean in this context? 4 Thanks for the question. We replaced “decreasing” with a more consistent expression to 5 6 highlight physical impairments negative effects. 7 8 9 R2.17 Page 9, Lines 19-21: Please correct citation #5. 10 11 Thanks for noticing the error. We corrected the citation adding the missing details. 12 13 14 R2.18 Figures 1 and 2: The resolution of the figures should be improved. Why did you 15 16 report the median instead of the mean with 95% confidence intervals? 17 We now exported the figures at higher resolution. 18 19 Thanks for noticing the typo. We replaced “median” with “mean”. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 Page 6 of 31 1 Kinematic traits of an elite Paralympic karateka: a case study 2 3 4 Authors: Filippo BERTOZZI1#, Matteo ZAGO1,2#, Daniela CIPRANDI1, Christel GALVANI3, 5 6 Chiarella SFORZA1,4* 7 8 9 Authors affiliations: 1Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di 10 2 11 Milano, Milan, Italy; Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering (DEIB), 12 Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy; 3Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro 13 14 Cuore, Milan, Italy; 4Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research 15 16 Council, Segrate, Italy 17 #Dr Bertozzi and Dr Zago equally contributed to this study 18 19 20 *Corresponding author: 21 22 Prof. Chiarella Sforza, MD 23 24 Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano 25 Via Mangiagalli 31, 20133, Milan, Italy 26 27 [email protected] 28 29 30 Abstract word count: 215 31 32 Text-only word count: 1920 33 Number of figures and tables: 2 figures; 1 table 34 35 Number of references: 26 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 Page 7 of 31 1 ABSTRACT 2 3 Karate is a martial art that include striking, kicking and punching techniques, demanding and 4 requires high levels of functional abilities skills.