DOCSLIB.ORG

Generic Names Published in Salisbury's Reviews of Robert Brown's Works Author(S): D

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Generic Names Published in Salisbury's Reviews of Robert Brown's Works Author(S): D Generic Names Published in Salisbury's Reviews of Robert Brown's Works Author(s): D. J. Mabberley Source: Taxon, Vol. 29, No. 5/6 (Nov., 1980), pp. 597-606 Published by: International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT) Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1220331 . Accessed: 15/09/2011 02:33 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT) is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Taxon. http://www.jstor.org TAXON 29(5/6):597-606. NOVEMBER1980 GENERIC NAMES PUBLISHED IN SALISBURY'S REVIEWS OF ROBERT BROWN'S WORKS D. J. Mabberley' Summary Generic names validly publishedin the Monthly review by Salisburyare identified, as are other overlooked names publishedby him elsewhere. Kunzea Rchb. (Myrtaceae)should be conserved againstTillospermum Salisb. Three of Salisbury'sgeneric names in currentuse are antedatedby others. It is pointedout thatHomoglossum is antedatedby Petamenes [Salisb.ex] J. W. Loud. (Iridaceae)and that Eurycles is a synonym of Proiphys Herb. (Amaryllidaceae), while Dipidax gives way to Onixotis Raf. (Liliaceae);the four necessary new combinationsare made. Appendedis a list of 64 overlooked names of tropicaland subtropicalplants of the Old World, though some names referableto South AfricanAloe and Erica spp. remainobscure. Introduction In August 1818, Robert Brown, then Librarian both to the Linnean Society and to Sir Joseph Banks, wrote to the Linnean's President, Sir James Edward Smith, "In the last No. of the Monthly Review you will find a remarkable botanical article, of which you will be at no loss to discover the author" (Sm. Corr. 2: 163 at Linnean Society). In the issue for July 1818 (vol. 86: 298-305) is a spiteful anonymous review of Brown's account of the plants collected on the disastrous Congo expedition led by Tuckey. As is obvious from its contents, and as is confirmed by the copy in the Bodleian Library, annotated 'R.A.S... .. y' by George Edward Griffiths (d. 1829), son of the Monthly review's founder, Ralph Griffiths (1720-1803), the author was Richard Anthony Salisbury (1761-1829). Salisbury criticizes Brown's prolixity, his overuse of the word 'remarkable' and his comments on the work of Cassini and others. Further, he notes, "The author [Brown] of this communication we have, on a former occasion, designated the most learned botanist living; and we say learned because all his works prove that indefatigable labour, joined to the unparalleled and we may add exclusive advantages which he enjoys as successor to Dryander in the Banksian Library, have enabled him to acquire so much knowledge, rather than any predilection for botany. ... In so extensive a field as this [the recognition of 'Natural Orders'] . a great deal of drudgery must be performed, to which labour- ers [unlike Brown] of the very highest talents will never submit"! The relationship between Salisbury and Brown had soured long before this, as I have tried to show in my forthcoming Jlpiter botanicus--Robert Brown of the British Museum, partly due to Salisbury's use of Brown's material on Proteaceae and other plants in his own publications and partly to the relationship between Salisbury and Smith, which began to deteriorate at the beginning of the century. Gone were the days when Smith had toppled Linnaeus's Ginkgo to make way for his Salisbltria, "named in honour of Richard Anthony Salisbury, Esq., F.R.S. and F.L.S. of whose acuteness and inde- fatigable zeal in the service of botany no testimony is necessary in this society, nor in any place which his writings have reached" (Trans. Linn. Soc. 3: 330, 1797). By April Departmentsof Botany and Forestry, Universityof Oxford, England. NOVEMBER 1980 597 1807 (Sm./McL. Corr.: 41 at Linnean Society), Smith was writing to the Society's secretary, Alexander MacLeay, "I wonder how some of Salisbury's trash got admit- ted [to the Transactions of the Linnean Society] " and they seemed to be taking every opportunity to slight one another in print as well as in correspondence. It appears that, in 1802, Salisbury had attempted to lead astray Smith's protege, William (later the Reverend William) Drake, then just sixteen years old, by offering to take him to see "a girl of his acquaintance in London," explaining that "it would be good for him, manly &c &c." (Banks Corr. 2: 324 at Kew). The ingenuous Drake sought the prim Smith's permission for the proposed excursion, to Salisbury's em- barrassment. Further, Smith disapproved of the way Salisbury had declared himself a bankrupt in order to regain possession of his estates in Yorkshire and even hinted that Salisbury's benefactrice, whose name Salisbury had taken, might be a fiction. The difference in their characters overcame their common link of botany and, despite Banks's effort to mediate, the rift between them widened, as Salisbury strengthened his views on the Natural System and Smith maintained the Linnaean System until more should be known, when a possibly more stable arrangement might be con- structed. Salisbury attacked Smith's copying of Linnaeus's descriptions in his Eng- lis/ botany and Smith was quick to deny this. Salisbury printed a pamphlet, Generic characters in the English botany, which he presented to the Society on 4 March 1806 (General Minute Book 2: 150). It caused uproar and the two were never reconciled, their arguments becoming so public that by February 1808, Samuel Frederick Gray was writing in his Botanical Report in the Monthly magazine, "Unfortunately for the science, Dr. Smith and Mr. Salisbury after professing the most inviolate friendship, for several years, have fallen out, are become such inveterate enemies, that while the one refuses to acknowledge even honours received from the hands of the other, the latter has declared war against the Linnaean System, apparently for no other reason, but through it, to wound the sides of his former friend, the professed admirer and champion of that system." In reply Smith wrote in the April issue that he and Salisbury had had no [botanicall quarrel before 1805, but when Salisbury tried to weigh in with a vindication of his views the editor wrote on 22 April 1808 (Letter with Misc. Salisbury MSS at British Museum (Natural History)): "Sir, I returnto you the enclosed paperbecause I shouldconsider it indecorousto give place in the MonthlyMagazine to so manyallegations & insinuationsrelative to a Gentlemanwhose charac- ter is generally respected & because I do not consider it necessary to impartany defence of yours, except in regardto the points relativeto which you feel yourself attacked. If the controversialistswho write in a periodicalwork were to reply to one allegationby retortingothers of differentkinds, the literaryJournals would be filled with little besides attack & defence & the Magazineswould become as contemptiblefrom their disregardof good man- ners as the reviews, which of late yours have outragedpublic decency by the personalrancour & privatemalice in whichtheir anotnymous writers indulge. Criticism has in consequencelost its respectability& utility & the magazineswould share the fate of the reviews if they were to pursue the same dishonourable course. I am anxious that my magazine should be the medium of correspondence & discussion among men of Letters, but I can never consent that it should become a sort of arena in which they should worry each other for the amusementof Bystanders. As far as you have been attacked by the worthy President, I shall cheerfully admit your reply, but as I do not wish to lengthen the controversy, I hope you will strictly confine yourself to these points. I am, Sir, Your Obdt Svt. R. Phillips Bridge Street April 22 1808" 598 TAXON VOLUME 29 Undeterred, Salisbury published his sally as a pamphlet in two editions, A letter to the editor of the Monthly Magazine, dated 10 April 1808 (copies at Linn. Soc. and at Kew) making their personal as well as botanical differences public. Smith had much to lose if the Linnaean System was dropped and his cautious approach to the Natural System was perhaps scarcely impartial. Nevertheless, the Natural System was firmly launched in France and Brown had set the seal on it in Britain with his Prodromius florae novae liollandiae et insulae van Diemen (1810). The Transactions were full of papers dealing with the 'new' system, but despite their ideological differences Brown and Smith got on reasonably well. Salisbury still frequented Banks's Library and, by the time of Banks's death in 1820, was still on good terms with John Lindley and William Herbert at least (Lindley Letters L-Z, Kew). For Smith he had become a bogeyman, so that as late as 1821, Smith was writing to Brown (10 i 1821, British Museum (Natural History)) of an article in Thomson's Annals of philosophy, where the Natural System was being promoted by Gray, "Who is Sam.1 Fred.k Gray Esqr? It must be R A (lie)S Esq. I could swear to the passage in Thompson's [sic] Annals v. 16 p. 130." In fact, Gray had criticized Salisbury's work in Hooker's Paradisiis londinensis, where many of his attacks including that on English botany had ap- peared, noting (Monthly magazine 23: 618, 1807), that Salisbury, "deaf to all remon- strances against the continual changing of names, never adopts such as do not accord with his own principles of nomenclature." Further, he wrote a laudatory account of Brown's Prodromiis, the only English review of the work, in the Monthly magazine and again praised it there in 1814 (Britten, 1922).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “Some Favourites Amongst Daffodils I Have Raised,” Guy L. Wilson
    PLANT LIFE, VOL. 9, NO. 1, JANUARY, 1953 BEkTIA ROPERTY OF AMERICAN DAFFODIL SOCIETY 1953 HERBERTIA EDITION [3 PREFACE The Narcissus articles for this SECOND NARCISSUS EDITION were as- sembled by the NARCISSUS COMMITTEE—Mr. Grant E. Mitsch, Chairman, and the other Committee Members. The NARCISSUS COMMITTEE is to be congratulated for an excellent job. The Committee has appropriately voted the 1953 HERBERT MEDAL Award to Mr. E. A. Bowles, V. M. H.. the eminent authority on Narcissus and the Galantheae. On account of the infirmities of advanced age, it has not been possible for Mr. Bowles to send in his autobiography in time for inclusion in this issue. There is a wealth of Narcissus lore in this SECOND NARCISSUS EDITION beginning with Mr. Wilson's interesting article on 40 years de- voted to Narcissus breeding. The 1946 HERBERT MEDAL was awarded to Mr. Wilson in recognition of his outstanding achievements in Narcissus treedirT. Mr. Quinn contributes a thought provoking paper on minia- ture and decorative daffodils, naturalizing in the Washington, D. C. re- gion, and a comprehensive beginners' list of daffodils, Mr. Hannibal writes about Narcissus viridiflorus, the green Narcissus, and other fall- flowering Narcissus, Mr. Powell, about his 30 years devoted to Narcissus breeding, Prof. Ballard, and Dr. Cooley, on Narcissus, Mr. Tuggle, on daffodils in Piedmont, Virginia, Mrs. Evans, on old naturalized Nar- cissus in the South, Mr. Mitsch, on daffodils in Oregon in 1952, and Mr. Johnson, on daffodils in northern California. The other amaryllids, as usual, are not neglected in this issue. Mrs. Morton reports on the 1952 New Orleans Amaryllis Show, and the dedi- cation of the New Orleans Amaryllis Garden, Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Chloroplast Genomes Shed Light on Phylogenetic
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Complete chloroplast genomes shed light on phylogenetic relationships, divergence time, and biogeography of Allioideae (Amaryllidaceae) Ju Namgung1,4, Hoang Dang Khoa Do1,2,4, Changkyun Kim1, Hyeok Jae Choi3 & Joo‑Hwan Kim1* Allioideae includes economically important bulb crops such as garlic, onion, leeks, and some ornamental plants in Amaryllidaceae. Here, we reported the complete chloroplast genome (cpDNA) sequences of 17 species of Allioideae, fve of Amaryllidoideae, and one of Agapanthoideae. These cpDNA sequences represent 80 protein‑coding, 30 tRNA, and four rRNA genes, and range from 151,808 to 159,998 bp in length. Loss and pseudogenization of multiple genes (i.e., rps2, infA, and rpl22) appear to have occurred multiple times during the evolution of Alloideae. Additionally, eight mutation hotspots, including rps15-ycf1, rps16-trnQ-UUG, petG-trnW-CCA , psbA upstream, rpl32- trnL-UAG , ycf1, rpl22, matK, and ndhF, were identifed in the studied Allium species. Additionally, we present the frst phylogenomic analysis among the four tribes of Allioideae based on 74 cpDNA coding regions of 21 species of Allioideae, fve species of Amaryllidoideae, one species of Agapanthoideae, and fve species representing selected members of Asparagales. Our molecular phylogenomic results strongly support the monophyly of Allioideae, which is sister to Amaryllioideae. Within Allioideae, Tulbaghieae was sister to Gilliesieae‑Leucocoryneae whereas Allieae was sister to the clade of Tulbaghieae‑ Gilliesieae‑Leucocoryneae. Molecular dating analyses revealed the crown age of Allioideae in the Eocene (40.1 mya) followed by diferentiation of Allieae in the early Miocene (21.3 mya). The split of Gilliesieae from Leucocoryneae was estimated at 16.5 mya.
    [Show full text]
  • The Correspondence of Julius Haast and Joseph Dalton Hooker, 1861-1886
    The Correspondence of Julius Haast and Joseph Dalton Hooker, 1861-1886 Sascha Nolden, Simon Nathan & Esme Mildenhall Geoscience Society of New Zealand miscellaneous publication 133H November 2013 Published by the Geoscience Society of New Zealand Inc, 2013 Information on the Society and its publications is given at www.gsnz.org.nz © Copyright Simon Nathan & Sascha Nolden, 2013 Geoscience Society of New Zealand miscellaneous publication 133H ISBN 978-1-877480-29-4 ISSN 2230-4495 (Online) ISSN 2230-4487 (Print) We gratefully acknowledge financial assistance from the Brian Mason Scientific and Technical Trust which has provided financial support for this project. This document is available as a PDF file that can be downloaded from the Geoscience Society website at: http://www.gsnz.org.nz/information/misc-series-i-49.html Bibliographic Reference Nolden, S.; Nathan, S.; Mildenhall, E. 2013: The Correspondence of Julius Haast and Joseph Dalton Hooker, 1861-1886. Geoscience Society of New Zealand miscellaneous publication 133H. 219 pages. The Correspondence of Julius Haast and Joseph Dalton Hooker, 1861-1886 CONTENTS Introduction 3 The Sumner Cave controversy Sources of the Haast-Hooker correspondence Transcription and presentation of the letters Acknowledgements References Calendar of Letters 8 Transcriptions of the Haast-Hooker letters 12 Appendix 1: Undated letter (fragment), ca 1867 208 Appendix 2: Obituary for Sir Julius von Haast 209 Appendix 3: Biographical register of names mentioned in the correspondence 213 Figures Figure 1: Photographs
    [Show full text]
  • Synopsis and Typification of Mexican and Central American
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien Jahr/Year: 2018 Band/Volume: 120B Autor(en)/Author(s): Berger Andreas Artikel/Article: Synopsis and typification of Mexican and Central American Palicourea (Rubiaceae: Palicoureeae), part I: The entomophilous species 59-140 ©Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, download unter www.zobodat.at Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien, B 120 59–140 Wien, Jänner 2018 Synopsis and typification of Mexican and Central American Palicourea (Rubiaceae: Palicoureeae), part I: The entomophilous species A. Berger* Abstract The prominent but complex genus Psychotria (Rubiaceae: Psychotrieae) is one of the largest genera of flow- ering plants and its generic circumscription has been controversial for a long time. Recent DNA-phyloge- netic studies in combination with a re-evaluation of morphological characters have led to a disintegration process that peaked in the segregation of hundreds of species into various genera within the new sister tribe Palicoureeae. These studies have also shown that species of Psychotria subg. Heteropsychotria are nested within Palicourea, which was traditionally separated by showing an ornithophilous (vs. entomophilous) pol- lination syndrome. In order to render the genera Palicourea and Psychotria monophyletic groups, all species of subg. Heteropsychotria have to be transferred to Palicourea and various authors and publications have provided some of the necessary combinations. In the course of ongoing research on biotic interactions and chemodiversity of the latter genus, the need for a comprehensive and modern compilation of species of Pali­ courea in its new circumscription became apparent. As first step towards such a synopsis, the entomophilous Mexican and Central American species (the traditional concept of Psychotria subg.
    [Show full text]
  • Australasian Lichenology Australasian Lichenology Number 45, July 1999 Number 45, July 1999
    Australasian Lichenology Australasian Lichenology Number 45, July 1999 Number 45, July 1999 Byssoloma sublmdulatllm lmm Byssoloma subdiscordans lmm ANNOUNCEMENTS Dampier 300, Biodiversity in Australia, Perth, 1999 .................................. ....... 2 14th meeting of Australasian lichenologists, Melbourne, 1999 ......................... 2 4th IAL Symposium, Barcelona, 2000 ..... .. .......................................................... 2 The Southern Connection, Christchurch, 2000 .. ............................ ..................... 3 ADDITIONAL LICHEN RECORDS FROM AUSTRALIA Archer, AW (40}-Pertusaria knightiana MUll. Arg........................................... 4 Elix, JA; Streimann, H (41}-Parmeliaceae. .................................... .. ................ 5 ADDITIONAL LICHEN RECORDS FROM NEW ZEALAND Galloway, DJ; Knight, A; Johnson, PN; Hayward, BW (30)-Polycoccum galli­ genum .. ............................................................................................................... 8 ARTICLES Lumbsch, HT-Notes on some genera erroneously reported for Australia ........ 10 Elix, JA; McCaffery, LF-Three new tridepsides in the lichenPseudocyphellaria billardierei ................................................................................ .. ................ ..... 12 Trinkaus, U; Mayrhofer, H; Matzer, M-Rinodinagennarii (Physciaceae), a wide­ spread species in the temperate regions of the Southern Hemisphere ........ 15 Malcolm, WM; Vezda, A; McCarthy, PM; Kantvilas, G-Porina subapplanata, a new species from
    [Show full text]
  • The Cultural Circulation of Political Economy, Botany, and Natural Knowledge
    social sciences $€ £ ¥ Article Malthus and the Philanthropists, 1764–1859: The Cultural Circulation of Political Economy, Botany, and Natural Knowledge J. Marc MacDonald Department of History, University of Prince Edward Island, 550 University Avenue, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada; [email protected]; Tel.: +1-902-569-4865 Academic Editor: Bryan L. Sykes Received: 16 July 2016; Accepted: 3 January 2017; Published: 10 January 2017 Abstract: Modernity does not possess a monopoly on mass incarceration, population fears, forced migration, famine, or climatic change. Indeed, contemporary and early modern concerns over these matters have extended interests in Thomas Malthus. Yet, despite extensive research on population issues, little work explicates the genesis of population knowledge production or how the process of intellectual transfer occurred during the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. This paper examines the Delessert network’s instrumental role in cultivating, curating, and circulating knowledge that popularized Malthusian population theory, including the theory’s constitutive elements of political economy, philanthropy, industry, agriculture, and botany. I show how deviant, nonconformist groups suffered forced migration for their political philosophy, particularly during the revolutionary 1790s, resulting in their imprisonment and migration to America. A consequence of these social shifts was the diffusion and dissemination of population theory—as a pursuit of scientific knowledge and exploration—across both sides of the Atlantic. By focusing on the Delesserts and their social network, I find that a byproduct of inter and intra continental migration among European elites was a knowledge exchange that stimulated Malthus’s thesis on population and Genevan Augustin Pyramus Candolle’s research on botany, ultimately culminating in Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection and human evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Rubiaceae, Ixoreae
    SYSTEMATICS OF THE PHILIPPINE ENDEMIC IXORA L. (RUBIACEAE, IXOREAE) Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades Dr. rer. nat. an der Fakultät Biologie/Chemie/Geowissenschaften der Universität Bayreuth vorgelegt von Cecilia I. Banag Bayreuth, 2014 Die vorliegende Arbeit wurde in der Zeit von Juli 2012 bis September 2014 in Bayreuth am Lehrstuhl Pflanzensystematik unter Betreuung von Frau Prof. Dr. Sigrid Liede-Schumann und Herrn PD Dr. Ulrich Meve angefertigt. Vollständiger Abdruck der von der Fakultät für Biologie, Chemie und Geowissenschaften der Universität Bayreuth genehmigten Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.). Dissertation eingereicht am: 11.09.2014 Zulassung durch die Promotionskommission: 17.09.2014 Wissenschaftliches Kolloquium: 10.12.2014 Amtierender Dekan: Prof. Dr. Rhett Kempe Prüfungsausschuss: Prof. Dr. Sigrid Liede-Schumann (Erstgutachter) PD Dr. Gregor Aas (Zweitgutachter) Prof. Dr. Gerhard Gebauer (Vorsitz) Prof. Dr. Carl Beierkuhnlein This dissertation is submitted as a 'Cumulative Thesis' that includes four publications: three submitted articles and one article in preparation for submission. List of Publications Submitted (under review): 1) Banag C.I., Mouly A., Alejandro G.J.D., Meve U. & Liede-Schumann S.: Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of Philippine Ixora L. (Rubiaceae). Submitted to Taxon, TAXON-D-14-00139. 2) Banag C.I., Thrippleton T., Alejandro G.J.D., Reineking B. & Liede-Schumann S.: Bioclimatic niches of endemic Ixora species on the Philippines: potential threats by climate change. Submitted to Plant Ecology, VEGE-D-14-00279. 3) Banag C.I., Tandang D., Meve U. & Liede-Schumann S.: Two new species of Ixora (Ixoroideae, Rubiaceae) endemic to the Philippines. Submitted to Phytotaxa, 4646.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Robert Scott (Ca
    Glasra 3: 115–143 (1998) ‘A willing Cicerone’: Professor Robert Scott (ca. 1757–1808) of Trinity College, Dublin, Fermanagh’s first botanist E. CHARLES NELSON Tippitiwitchet Cottage, Hall Road, Outwell, Wisbech, PE14 8PE, U.K. INTRODUCTION Having been brought up in the lakeland of County Fermanagh, it is hardly surprising that Robert Scott1 (Figure 1) loved outdoors pursuits, fishing for trout, fowling, and geological or botanical rambles looking for minerals, or mosses, lichens and fungi, those inconspicuous but ubiquitous plants that are so often ignored. He was an ‘ingenious, lively man with great merit, and a good botanist’2 and to him Dawson Turner, a Norfolk banker who was also an antiquarian and an eminent botanist, dedicated Muscologiae Hibernicae spicilegium (Figures 2a & b), published privately in Yarmouth in the early Spring 1804. Only the scantiest fragments of information have been published about Scott, who was Professor of Botany in the University of Dublin from late November 1800 until his death in September 1808. Praeger3 recounted his professorship (but gave incorrect dates4) and noted that Scott had discovered intermediate bladderwort, Utricularia intermedia, in Fermanagh5 and the moss Dicranum scottianum in Cavan, that Muscologiae Hibernicae spicilegium was dedicated to him by his ‘chief friend’, Dawson Turner, and that Robert Brown coined Scottia for an Australian genus in the Fabaceae in his memory. Scott received brief mentions in Smith’s English botany,6 Moore’s synopsis of the mosses of Ireland,7 and in the historical preface to Colgan’s Flora of the county Dublin8 where he is credited with adding upright brome, Bromus (= Bromopsis) erectus, to the county’s flora, as well as horned pondweed, Zannichellia palustris, beaked tasselweed, Ruppia maritima, and greater pond-sedge, Carex riparia.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation and Soil Assessment of Selected Waterholes of the Diamantina and Warburton Rivers, South Australia, 2014-2016
    Vegetation and Soil Assessment of Selected Waterholes of the Diamantina and Warburton Rivers, South Australia, 2014-2016 J.S. Gillen June 2017 Report to the South Australian Arid Lands Natural Resources Management Board Fenner School of Environment & Society, Australian National University, Canberra Disclaimer The South Australian Arid Lands Natural Resources Management Board, and its employees do not warrant or make any representation regarding the use, or results of use of the information contained herein as to its correctness, accuracy, reliability, currency or otherwise. The South Australian Arid Lands Natural Resources Management Board and its employees expressly disclaim all liability or responsibility to any person using the information or advice. © South Australian Arid Lands Natural Resources Management Board 2017 This report may be cited as: Gillen, J.S. Vegetation and soil assessment of selected waterholes of the Diamantina and Warburton Rivers, South Australia, 2014-16. Report by Australian National University to the South Australian Arid Lands Natural Resources Management Board, Pt Augusta. Cover images: Warburton River April 2015; Cowarie Crossing Warburton River May 2016 Copies of the report can be obtained from: Natural Resources Centre, Port Augusta T: +61 (8) 8648 5300 E: [email protected] Vegetation and Soil Assessment 2 Contents 1 Study Aims and Funding Context 6 2 Study Region Characteristics 7 2.1 Location 7 2.2 Climate 7 3 The Diamantina: dryland river in an arid environment 10 3.1 Methodology 11 3.2 Stages 12
    [Show full text]
  • The Linnean NEWSLETTER and PROCEEDINGS of the LINNEAN SOCIETY of LONDON
    The Linnean NEWSLETTER AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY OF LONDON Volume 36 Number 1 April 2020 Gangetic Fishes: Parallel History: A British Discovery: Francis Hamilton's Gesellscha� Naturforschender William Bingley FLS commissioned images Freunde zu Berlin AND MORE... Communicating nature since 1788 The Linnean Society of London Burlington House, Piccadilly, London W1J 0BF UK Toynbee House, 92–94 Toynbee Road, Wimbledon SW20 8SL UK (by appointment only) +44 (0)20 7434 4479 www.linnean.org [email protected] @LinneanSociety President SECRETARIES COUNCIL Dr Sandra Knapp Scienti fi c The Offi cers () Vice Presidents Vice Presidents Prof. Simon Hiscock Dr Malcolm Scoble Dr Colin Clubbe Dr Olwen Grace Mathew Frith Dr Blanca Huertas Editorial Prof. Beverley Glover Prof. Paul Henderson Prof. Mark Chase FRS Prof. Anjali Goswami Dr Malcolm Scoble Prof. Alistair Hetherington Collecti ons Prof. Alan Hildrew Treasurer Prof. Dame Georgina Mace FRS Dr Mark Watson Dr John David Dr Silvia Pressel Strategy Prof. Max Telford Dr Natasha de Vere Prof. David Cutler Stephanie West THE TEAM Execu� ve Secretary Financial Controller & Conservator Dr Elizabeth Rollinson Membership Offi cer Janet Ashdown Priya Nithianandan Head of Collec� ons Special Publica� ons Manager Dr Isabelle Charman� er Buildings & Offi ce Manager Leonie Berwick Librarian Helen Shaw Educa� on & Public Engagement Will Beharrell Communica� ons & Events Manager Joe Burton Archivist Manager (To be announced) Mul� media Content Producer c Ross Ziegelmeier Liz M Gow Room Hire & Membership Assistant Archivist Assistant Ta� ana Franco BioMedia Meltdown Project Luke Thorne Offi cer Daryl Stenvoll-Wells Digital Assets Manager Archivist emerita Andrea Deneau Engagement Research & Gina Douglas Delivery Offi cer Zia Forrai Editor Publishing in The Linnean Gina Douglas The Linnean is published twice a year, in April and October.
    [Show full text]
  • The Flower Chain the Early Discovery of Australian Plants
    The Flower Chain The early discovery of Australian plants Hamilton and Brandon, Jill Douglas Hamilton Duchess of University of Sydney Library Sydney, Australia 2002 http://setis.library.usyd.edu.au/ozlit © University of Sydney Library. The texts and images are not to be used for commercial purposes without permission Source Text: Prepared with the author's permission from the print edition published by Kangaroo Press Sydney 1998 All quotation marks are retained as data. First Published: 1990 580.994 1 Australian Etext Collections at botany prose nonfiction 1940- women writers The flower chain the early discovery of Australian plants Sydney Kangaroo Press 1998 Preface Viewing Australia through the early European discovery, naming and appreciation of its flora, gives a fresh perspective on the first white people who went to the continent. There have been books on the battle to transform the wilderness into an agriculturally ordered land, on the convicts, on the goldrush, on the discovery of the wealth of the continent, on most aspects of settlement, but this is the first to link the story of the discovery of the continent with the slow awareness of its unique trees, shrubs and flowers of Australia. The Flower Chain Chapter 1 The Flower Chain Begins Convict chains are associated with early British settlement of Australia, but there were also lighter chains in those grim days. Chains of flowers and seeds to be grown and classified stretched across the oceans from Botany Bay to Europe, looping back again with plants and seeds of the old world that were to Europeanise the landscape and transform it forever.
    [Show full text]
  • ALKALOID-BEARING PLANTS and THEIR CONTAINED ALKALOIDS by J
    ALKALOID-BEARING PLANTS and Their Contained Alkaloids TT'TBUCK \ \ '■'. Technical Bulletin No. 1234 AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors are indebted to J. W. Schermerhorn and M. W. Quimby, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy, for access to the original files of the Lynn Index; to K. F. Rauiïauf, Smith, Kline & French Labora- tories, and to J. H. Hoch, Medical College of South Carolina, for extensive lists of alkaloid plants; to V. S. Sokolov, V. L. Komarova Academy of Science, Leningrad, for a copy of his book; to J. M. Fogg, Jr., and H. T. Li, Morris Arboretum, for botanical help and identification of Chinese drug names ; to Michael Dymicky, formerly of the Eastern Utilization Research and Development Division, for ex- tensive translations; and to colleagues in many countries for answering questions raised during the compilation of these lists. CONTENTS Page Codes used in table 1 2 Table 1.—Plants and their contained alkaloids 7 Table 2.—Alkaloids and the plants in which they occur 240 Washington, D.C. Issued August 1961 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Qovemment Printing OflSce. Washington 25, D.C. Price $1 ALKALOID-BEARING PLANTS AND THEIR CONTAINED ALKALOIDS By J. J. WiLLAMAN, chemist, Eastern Utilization Research and Development Division, and BERNICE G. SCHUBERT, taxonomist. Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service This compilation assembles in one place all the scattered information on the occurrence of alkaloids in the plant world. It consists of two lists: (1) The names of the plants and of their contained alkaloids; and (2) the names and empirical formulas of the alkaloids.
    [Show full text]