Covered Bridges National Historic Landmark Context Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Covered Bridges National Historic Landmark Context Study NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 08-2002) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. X New Submission Amended Submission ======================================================================================= A. Name of Multiple Property Listing ======================================================================================= COVERED BRIDGES NHL CONTEXT STUDY ======================================================================================= B. Associated Historic Contexts ======================================================================================= ======================================================================================= C. Form Prepared by ======================================================================================= name/title Lola Bennett, Historian organization Heritage Documentation Programs, National Park Service address 1201 I Street NW, 7th Floor city/town Washington state DC zip 20005 code ======================================================================================= D. Certification ======================================================================================= As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation. (See continuation sheet for additional comments.) ____________________________________________ _________________________________ Signature and Title of Certifying Official Date ____________________________________________ _________________________________ State or Federal Agency or Tribal Government Date I hereby certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing in the National Register. ____________________________________________ _________________________________ Signature of the Keeper Date NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 08-2002) COVERED BRIDGES NHL CONTEXT STUDY Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form Provide the following information on continuation sheets. Cite the letter and the title before each section of the narrative. Assign page numbers according to the instructions for continuation sheets in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Fill in page numbers for each section in the space below. Page Number E. Statement of Historic Contexts 3 F. Associated Property Types 28 G. Geographical Data 31 H. Summary of Identification and Evaluation Methods 32 Covered Bridges Proposed for National Historic Landmark Consideration 35 I. Major Bibliographical References 42 =============================================================================== Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for listing, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.). A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. Estimated Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 120 hours per response including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this form to the National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C St., NW, Washington, DC 20240. NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 08-2002) COVERED BRIDGES NHL CONTEXT STUDY Page 3 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form E. STATEMENT OF HISTORIC CONTEXTS Covered bridges are a pre-eminently American phenomenon. Nowhere else in the world were such impressive timber bridges attempted, and nowhere else were they built in such vast numbers.1 Over the course of two centuries, covered bridges have played a significant role in American life, by facilitating settlement, transportation, and commerce. They also represent a period of remarkable achievement in civil engineering, during which bridge building evolved from an empirical craft to a science. At the height of covered bridge building, around 1870, there were well over 10,000 covered bridges in the United States.2 Timber bridges have been built in forested regions of the world for centuries.3 Wood is an excellent material for building; it is strong, relatively lightweight, and easy to work with. Since most species of wood suitable for structural applications deteriorate rapidly when exposed to the weather, bridge builders quickly learned the value of covering wood bridges with roofs and siding to protect the underlying framework.4 Several European covered bridges have survived for more than three centuries, while a few in the United States are nearing the two-century mark.5 Following the American Revolutionary War, the demand for roads and bridges, coupled with access to abundant forests, spurred the independent development of timber bridge design in the United States.6 In 1805, America's first known covered bridge was completed across the Schuylkill River at Philadelphia. By 1810, there were covered bridges at most major river crossings in the Northeast. From Philadelphia, covered bridge building spread northward, southward, and westward at a rapid pace. The construction of timber bridges utilized readily available materials and common hand tools. Skilled carpenters could erect an average-sized covered bridge within a few weeks. By 1850, there were covered bridges in most settled regions of the United States. The golden era of covered bridge building lasted about a century in most areas of United States, and even longer in areas where timber was plentiful.7 In the late-nineteenth century, timber truss bridges were eclipsed by comparable spans of iron. Railroads enabled manufacturers to ship prefabricated metal bridges to distant markets and compete with local builders for contracts. The last decade of the nineteenth century saw the rise of the Good Roads Movement and growing demand for modern bridges, a trend that gained momentum with the advent of the automobile. In the face of the technological and industrial advances of the first decades of the 1900s, covered bridges, now traversed by motorized vehicles or glimpsed from modern highways, generated powerful 1 American scholars have recently become aware of hundreds of ancient covered bridges in China; however, most of these bridges were built for pedestrian use and their construction techniques and reason for covering differ from the Western tradition. 2 This is only a rough estimate of known covered bridges that existed c.1870. Initial data compiled by the “Covered Spans of Yesteryear Project,” http://www.lostbridges.org, suggests that this figure may be too low. 3 In 55 BC, Julius Caesar (100 BC-44 BC) built the world’s first major timber bridge across the Rhine River near present-day Koblenz, Germany. 4 It is believed that this practice originated in Switzerland. 5 Hyde Hall Bridge (1825) is believed to be the oldest covered bridge in the United States. See HAER No. NY-330, Hyde Hall Bridge, Otsego County, New York. 6 While it is likely that American builders were aware of covered bridges in Europe, there is very little documentation to suggest a direct transfer of knowledge from Europe to America. 7 Covered bridge building persisted longer in different regions. For example, it ended in New England around 1920, in the Midwest around 1925, and in the South around 1935. Covered bridges continued to be built in Oregon into the 1950s. NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 08-2002) COVERED BRIDGES NHL CONTEXT STUDY Page 4 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form feelings of nostalgia for many Americans. In the 1930s, covered bridges emerged in popular culture. During this period, antiquarians and hobbyists also set out to visit, photograph, and gather information about those structures that survived. Collecting images and information about these historic structures led to the formation of covered bridge societies in the 1940s. As this movement gained momentum in the 1950s and 60s, local and state officials began to promote covered bridges as tourist attractions to boost their local economies.
Recommended publications
  • Group Tour Manual
    Group Tour GUIDE 1 5 17 33 36 what's inside 1 WELCOME 13 FUN FACTS – (ESCORT NOTES) 2 WEATHER INFORMATION 17 ATTRACTIONS 3 GROUP TOUR SERVICES 30 SIGHTSEEING 5 TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION 32 TECHNICAL TOURS Airport 35 PARADES Motorcoach Parking – Policies 36 ANNUAL EVENTS Car Rental Metro & Trolley 37 SAMPLE ITINERARIES 7 MAPS Central Corridor Metro Forest Park Downtown welcome St. Louis is a place where history and imagination collide, and the result is a Midwestern destination like no other. In addition to a revitalized downtown, a vibrant, new hospitality district continues to grow in downtown St. Louis. More than $5 billion worth of development has been invested in the region, and more exciting projects are currently underway. The Gateway to the West offers exceptional music, arts and cultural options, as well as such renowned – and free – attractions as the Saint Louis Art Museum, Zoo, Science Center, Missouri History Museum, Citygarden, Grant’s Farm, Laumeier Sculpture Park, and the Anheuser-Busch brewery tours. Plus, St. Louis is easy to get to and even easier to get around in. St. Louis is within approximately 500 miles of one-third of the U.S. population. Each and every new year brings exciting additions to the St. Louis scene – improved attractions, expanded attractions, and new attractions. Must See Attractions There’s so much to see and do in St. Louis, here are a few options to get you started: • Ride to the top of the Gateway Arch, towering 630-feet over the Mississippi River. • Visit an artistic oasis in the heart of downtown.
    [Show full text]
  • Jefferson National Expansion Memorial______AND/OR COMMON the Gateway Arch, the Old Courthouse, and the Old Cathedral LOCATION
    Form No. 10-306 (Rev. 10-74) UNlTtDSTATtS DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY -- NOMINATION FORM FOR FEDERAL PROPERTIES SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS __________TYPE ALL ENTRIES - COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS_________ | NAME HISTORIC Jefferson National Expansion Memorial____________________ AND/OR COMMON The Gateway Arch, The Old Courthouse, and The Old Cathedral LOCATION _NOT FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT St. Louis t _ VICINITY OF Third STATE CODE COUNTY CODE Missouri 29 St. Louis 510 HCLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE ^-DISTRICT X-PUBLIC X-OCCUPIED —AGRICULTURE. XJVIUSEUM _ BUILDING(S) X-PRIVATE —UNOCCUPIED —COMMERCIAL X-PARK _ STRUCTURE —BOTH X_WORK IN PROGRESS —EDUCATIONAL —PRIVATE RESIDENCE —SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE —ENTERTAINMENT X.RELIGIOUS —OBJECT —IN PROCESS —YES: RESTRICTED —GOVERNMENT —SCIENTIFIC —BEING CONSIDERED X-YES: UNRESTRICTED —INDUSTRIAL —TRANSPORTATION —NO —MILITARY —OTHER: AGENCY REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS (If applicable) U.S. National Park Service, Midwest Regional Office STREET & NUMBER 1709 Jackson Street CITY. TOWN STATE Omaha VICINITY OF Nebraska LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS'. u>s> National Park Service. MWRO STREET & NUMBER 1709 Jackson Street CITY, TOWN STATE Omaha Nebraska 1 REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE .Historic American Buildings Survey DATE X 1936 ^FEDERAL —STATE —COUNTY —LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS Library of Congress CITY. TOWN STATE Washington B.C. (See Continuation Sheet, page l) CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE —EXCELLENT —DETERIORATED —UNALTERED X-QRIGINAL SITE X_GOOD —RUINS X_ALTERED —MOVED DATE_______ X-FAIR _UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IFKNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The "business center of old St. Louis grew up along the levee, where the riverfront was the jumping-off place for journeys westward.
    [Show full text]
  • The Designing of the Eads Bridge John A. Kouwenhoven Technology
    The Designing of the Eads Bridge John A. Kouwenhoven Technology and Culture, Vol. 23, No. 4. (Oct., 1982), pp. 535-568. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0040-165X%28198210%2923%3A4%3C535%3ATDOTEB%3E2.0.CO%3B2-0 Technology and Culture is currently published by The Johns Hopkins University Press. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/jhup.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. http://www.jstor.org Thu Sep 13 11:00:37 2007 The Designing of the Eads Bridge JOHN A.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridging the Mississippi: a History of the Rivalry Between Suspension and Arch Modes of Engineering Kurt Timmerman University of Missouri-St
    University of Missouri, St. Louis IRL @ UMSL Theses Graduate Works 10-31-2014 Bridging the Mississippi: A History of the Rivalry between Suspension and Arch Modes of Engineering Kurt Timmerman University of Missouri-St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: http://irl.umsl.edu/thesis Recommended Citation Timmerman, Kurt, "Bridging the Mississippi: A History of the Rivalry between Suspension and Arch Modes of Engineering" (2014). Theses. 166. http://irl.umsl.edu/thesis/166 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Works at IRL @ UMSL. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of IRL @ UMSL. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Bridging the Mississippi: A History of the Rivalry between Suspension and Arch Modes of Engineering Kurt J. Timmerman M.A., History, University of Missouri-St. Louis, 2014 B.S., Systems and Data Processing, Washington University, 1991 A Thesis submitted to The Graduate School at the University of Missouri-St. Louis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in History December 2014 Advisory Committee Louis S. Gerties, Ph.D. Chairperson Steven Rowan, Ph. D. Carlos A. Schwantes, Ph.D. Copyright, Kurt J. Timmerman, 2014 Acknowledgements Thanks to Dr. Steven Rowan and Dr. Carlos Schwantes, who provided valuable insight, knowledge, perspective, and a fresh review of my manuscript. Both were very helpful in reviewing my manuscript and offering improvements that made it a much better document. Dr. Gerteis, my thesis advisor, was very helpful and patient during my research and never hesitated to give answers to my questions in a calm, instructive manner.
    [Show full text]
  • A Context for Common Historic Bridge Types
    A Context For Common Historic Bridge Types NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15 Prepared for The National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Council National Research Council Prepared By Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage October 2005 NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15 A Context For Common Historic Bridge Types TRANSPORATION RESEARCH BOARD NAS-NRC PRIVILEGED DOCUMENT This report, not released for publication, is furnished for review to members or participants in the work of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). It is to be regarded as fully privileged, and dissemination of the information included herein must be approved by the NCHRP. Prepared for The National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Council National Research Council Prepared By Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage October 2005 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SPONSORSHIP This work was sponsored by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration, and was conducted in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program, which is administered by the Transportation Research Board of the National Research Council. DISCLAIMER The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied in the report are those of the research team. They are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board, the National Research Council, the Federal Highway Administration, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, or the individual states participating in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research reported herein was performed under NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 15, by Parsons Brinckerhoff and Engineering and Industrial Heritage. Margaret Slater, AICP, of Parsons Brinckerhoff (PB) was principal investigator for this project and led the preparation of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Merchants Bridge Main Span and East Approach
    Merchants Bridge Main Span and East Approach Allen Smith Nick Staroski HISTORY St Louis Merchants Exchange funded to compete with Eads Bridge Panic of 1893 resulted in St Louis Merchants Exchange giving up ownership TRRA took ownership 1890 First Major rehabilitation occurred in 1902 Second Major rehab occurred in 2004 CONSTRUCTION HISTORY – MAIN SPAN CONSTRUCTION HISTORY – MAIN SPAN CONSTRUCTION HISTORY – EAST APPROACH CONSTRUCTION HISTORY – PNEUMATIC CAISSONS GEORGE MORISON Harvard Graduate. Lawyer and engineer Mentored by Octave Chanute Mentored Ralph Modjeski Designed multiple truss bridges over Mississippi, Ohio, and Missouri River Instrumental in the location of the Panama Canal BRIDGE OWNERSHIP HISTORY St Louis Merchants Exchange 1890-1893 Terminal Railroad of St Louis 1893-present BRIDGE DESCRIPTION 3 Span Through Truss 4,340-ft Total Length: 518’-518’-518’ Main Spans Deck plate Girder Approaches BRIDGE DESCRIPTION Multi–beam Trestles Constructed 1902 BRIDGE DESCRIPTION Deck Plate Girder Approaches Constructed 2004 PROJECT GOALS Return service to both tracks across bridge at E80 loading 15-ft track centers Minimize maintenance Minimize impacts to rail and maritime traffic during construction Minimize risk due to vessel impact and seismic events Inspection access PROJECT TEAM TranSystems Corporation- Prime Burns and McDonnell – Major Sub SCI Engineering - Geotechnical EDSI – Pick-up Survey Cardno/KCI – Utility Coordination PROJECT TIMELINE West Approach Project Began 2014 Consultant selected for Main
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown St. Louis Transportation Guide
    Transportation St. Louis Lambert International Airport St. Louis is situated at the geographic hub of the United States. Our location makes it possible for your attendees to fly to St. Louis from most major U.S. cities in just two to three hours. Flights St. Louis Wayfinding Signage MetroLink Station On average there are more than 237 daily departures from St. Louis to 74 non-stop destinations. Ten airlines, along with their affiliates and charter companies, offer service to/from St. Louis. MetroLink St. Louis’ light rail system, MetroLink, has been called one of the best mass transit systems in the country. The system – which begins at St. Louis Lambert International Airport and covers 48 miles – ends in suburban Belleville, Illinois at Scott Air Force Base/Shiloh and stops at 37 Missouri and Illinois stations in between. A one-way ride on MetroLink costs $2.50. Tickets may be purchased and validated at each station. Tickets from the airport station to downtown St. Louis cost $4.00. Day Passes for MetroLink and MetroBus are $7.50. Trains run every seven St. Louis Lambert International Airport minutes during rush hours, every 10 minutes during non-rush hours and every 15 minutes in the evening during the week. For Ride Sharing Services schedule information, dial (314) 231-2345. TTY: (314) 982-1555. Uber and Lyft are both available in St. Louis. Several Visit www.metrostlouis.org for more information. major venues such as Busch Stadium, Ballpark Village, Chaifetz Arena and more offer designated pick-up and Buses drop-off spots. The Bi-State MetroBus system serves most areas of St.
    [Show full text]
  • REHABILITATION PROJECT FACTS Mike Bost • First Full-Scale Rehabilitation of the Truss and U.S
    TODAY’S AGENDA “THE STAR-SPANGLED BANNER” by F.S. Key and J.S. Smith | arr. D. Burke East St. Louis Senior High School Marching Flyer Band John C. Barnes, Band Director University City High School “Golden Explosion” Marching Band Daniel Shavers, Band Director | Rob Giles, Assistant Band Director INTRODUCTION At the dedication of the bridge in 1874, James Eads declared that the bridge would endure John Nations President and CEO, Bi-State Development just so long as it continues to be REMARKS useful to the people that come after us David Dietzel —Howard Miller, “The Eads Bridge” Board Chairman, Bi-State Development Ray Friem BRIDGE FACTS Executive Director, Metro Transit • Length: 4,600 feet Mokhtee Ahmad • Width: 54 feet, 4 inches Regional Administrator, Federal Transit Administration • Designed by James Buchanan Eads Emeka Jackson-Hicks • Dedicated on July 4, 1874 Mayor, City of East St. Louis, Illinois • Designated a National Historic Landmark in 1964 • Added to National Register of Historic Places in 1966 Mark Kern St. Clair County, Illinois Board Chairman, REHABILITATION PROJECT FACTS Mike Bost • First full-scale rehabilitation of the truss and U.S. Representative, 12th Congressional District, Illinois superstructure of the 142-year old Eads Bridge William ‘Lacy’ Clay • The project team installed more than 580 tons of U.S. Representative, 1st Congressional District, Missouri steel and applied 7,500 gallons of protective coating Richard Durbin during the rehabilitation of the bridge U.S. Senator, Illinois • Over 1,200 individual structural repairs were made • Extended the life of the bridge by 75 years INCLUDING • All work was completed while also keeping the Special tours of the Eads Bridge rail deck on MetroLink bridge open to MetroLink, vehicle and river traffic Food and beverages available for purchase from local food trucks HISTORY A true engineering marvel, the Eads Bridge is the oldest bridge still in operation over the Mississippi River.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Bridges” – GSSI Junior Council’S Own Badge
    “Building Bridges” – GSSI Junior Council’s Own Badge There are more than half a million bridges in the USA and you rely on them every day to cross a river, road or other obstacle. The Mississippi River Region is a showcase of bridges from our past and westward expansion. Today they serve as a vital role in the economy and the region. In this badge you will learn about different bridges and their uses, engineering, construction and design. Get ready and cross the bridge to understanding these structures and the impact they have on your life! Steps 1. Be a bridge detective 2. Take a trip 3. Go back in time 4. Tools of the Trade 5. Under Construction Purpose When I’ve earned this badge, I’ll have explored bridge design and construction in my community. Step 1 Be a bridge detective Be a detective and learn about the design of bridges. CHOICES – DO ONE: Bridge design. Bridges come in all kinds of designs. Find out about the four basic types of bridges: beam, arch, truss and suspension. Why are some curved and others straight? Learn about the advantages and disadvantages of each. How do bridges effect the environment? Discuss the impact of bridges on transportation and the environment. Find out what steps are taken to ensure that a new bridge will be built in a most needed area with as little impact as possible on the environment and natural habitats. Did you know that archeologists who are experts in the past, research a possible bridge site for artifacts, cemetaries, burial grounds or other significant historical items before the project begins? Famous bridges.
    [Show full text]
  • Detour Directions to the Riverboats at the Gateway Arch
    Detour Directions to the Riverboats at the Gateway Arch ALERT: South Access CLOSED 8pm – 6am every Friday – Sunday Leonor K Sullivan Blvd access is restricted from 8pm – 6am on Friday, Saturday & Sunday evenings. During these times, levee parking and access to the Riverboats at the Gateway Arch Riverboats is only available from the NORTH via Biddle Street. From Illinois: Poplar Street Bridge Heading WEST on the Poplar Street Bridge, in the far right lane, take exit 40B for 44East/70West to Kansas City/Walnut Street. Keep LEFT on the ramp to merge onto I-44 East. Remain in the Exit Only lane and take first exit 292 for 3rd Street/Washington Ave./Eads Bridge. Quickly merge to the far right lane, then continue straight ahead (crossing Washington Ave.) Continue NORTH on 3rd Street (past Laclede’s Landing Blvd. & Carr Street) then turn RIGHT on Biddle Street. Continue EAST on Biddle to the riverfront and turn RIGHT onto Leonor K. Sullivan Blvd. The levee entrance will be on your LEFT across from Laclede’s Landing Blvd. Turn left to access the levee then continue south along the levee past the Eads Bridge to reach the Riverboats at the Gateway Arch. From Illinois: MLK Bridge Heading WEST on MLK Bridge, after crossing the bridge, follow the road to the right (careful not to take the interstate on-ramp onto 44E). Continue NORTH on Lumiere Place Blvd. (past Carr Street) then turn RIGHT on Biddle Street. Continue EAST to the riverfront and turn RIGHT onto Leonor K. Sullivan Blvd. The levee entrance will be on your LEFT across from Laclede’s Landing Blvd.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstruction of the Eads Bridge Highway Deck
    Reconstruction of the Eads Bridge Highway Deck Michael J. Cronin, PE, SE Eads Bridge History y Opened to traffic July 4, 1874 y Designed and planned by James Buchanan Eads − Underwater salvage expert − Shipbuilder − No formal education − Hired by the St. Louis and Illinois Bridge Company as engineer-in-chief for this project Eads Bridge History y Design and construction innovations − deep pressurized caisson construction Eads Bridge History y Design and construction innovations − deep pressurized caisson construction − high strength cast steel Eads Bridge History y Design and construction innovations − deep pressurized caisson construction − high strength cast steel − design of components to permit ease of replacement Eads Bridge History y Design and construction innovations − deep pressurized caisson construction − high strength cast steel − design of components to permit ease of replacement − cantilever construction of main arch spans Eads Bridge History y Design and construction innovations − Deep pressurized caisson construction − high strength cast steel − design of components to permit ease of replacement − cantilever construction of main arch spans − 500 ft spans were 200 ft longer than any built previously Bridge Ownership History y Illinois and St Louis Bridge Company y Missouri Pacific Railroad Company y Terminal Railroad Association y City of St. Louis / Bi-State Development Agency Rehabilitation Challenges y Preserve historically important aesthetic elements y Use existing substructure to support new highway deck y Maintain
    [Show full text]
  • Pedestrian CRUISES 55 Entrance to Riverboats Mississippi River Poplar Street Bridge Street Poplar Macarthur Bridge
    N 13th St N 13th St Mullanphy St Howard St Hadley St Madison St N Tucker Blvd Biddle St Cole St S Tucker Blvd Carr St S 11th St Hadley St N 11th St Chambers St N 11th St S 11th St N Tucker Blvd S 10th St N 11th St Tyler St La Beaume St Olive St Olive Pine St Pine Spruce St Spruce Clark Ave Market St N 10th St Walnut St Walnut Locust St Locust St. Charles St St. Dr. MLK Dr MLK Dr. Lucas Ave Lucas S 10th St Chestnut St N 10th St Ave Washington Convention Plaza Convention Cerre St Cerre Gratiot St Gratiot Dickson St Cass Ave S 9th St Hempstead St N 9th St S 9th St N 9th St Renaissance The Westin Citygarden St Howard St. Louis N 8th St Grand Hotel S 8th St S 8th St America’s N 8th St Center Lebanon Dr Lebanon N 7th St Mound St N 7th St O’Fallon St Biddle St N 7th St Cole St Carr St Embassy Suites Busch Mullanphy St Stadium Chestnut St The Dome at Stan Musial Veterans Memorial Bridge Locust St Locust N 6th St S 6th St Clark Ave Ballpark Village America’s Center Lasalle St Hickory St Florida St Market St Kiener Chouteau Ave Chouteau Drury Inn Hilton Plaza Cass Ave Walnut St Walnut & Suites Ballpark N Broadway Dickson St Mound St Convention Plaza Convention Gratiot St Gratiot S Broadway N Broadway Collin St 40 Old N Broadway Court- Hilton O’Fallon St house St Pine Cerre St Cerre Down- Ave Lucas Spruce St Spruce Olive St Olive 44 N 2nd St 64 Ave Washington town N 3rd St Biddle St S 4th St N 4th St Charles St St.
    [Show full text]