9.4 TOWNSHIP of HAMILTON This Section Presents the Jurisdictional Annex for the Township of Hamilton

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

9.4 TOWNSHIP of HAMILTON This Section Presents the Jurisdictional Annex for the Township of Hamilton SECTION 9.4: TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON 9.4 TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON This section presents the jurisdictional annex for the Township of Hamilton. 9.4.1 HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT The following individuals have been identified as the hazard mitigation plan’s primary and alternate points of contact. Primary Point of Contact Alternate Point of Contact David Carothers, Public Works Lt. Jeff Martin, Police Department 240 Tampa Avenue, Hamilton, NJ 08650 1270 Whitehorse-Mercerville Road, Hamilton, NJ 08650 (609) 890-3567 (609) 581-4012 [email protected] [email protected] 9.4.2 MUNICIPAL PROFILE Hamilton Township is located southern Mercer County and encompasses an area of 40.4 square miles. It was incorporated on April 11, 1842. The Township is bordered to the north by Lawrence Township, to the east by the Townships of West Windsor, Robbinsville and Upper Freehold (Monmouth County), to the south by the Townships of Bordentown and Chesterfield (both Burlington County), and the west by the City of Trenton and the Delaware River. Other rivers, streams, lakes and ponds in the Township include: Miry Run, Assunpink Creek, Pond Run, Crosswicks Creek, Doctors Creek, Gropp Lake, and Spring Lake. Within the Township, there are several unincorporated communities: Groveville, Hamilton Square, Mercerville, White Horse, Yardville, Briar Manor, Broad Street Park, Bromley, Chewalla Park, Creston, DeCou Village, Deutzville, Duck Island, East Trenton Heights, Edgebrook, Extonville, Golden Crest, Gropps Lake, Haines Corner, Hutchinson Mills, Lakeside Park, Maple Shade, North Crosswicks, Nottingham, Oil City, Pond Run, Quaker Bridge, Quaker Gardens, Rosemont, The Orchards, Trenton Gardens, Warner Village, White City and Yardville Heights. Van Nest Wildlife Refuge is a 98-acre wildlife management area in the Township. According to the U.S. Census, the 2010 population for the Township was 88,464, making it the ninth largest municipality, by population, in New Jersey. Growth/Development Trends The following table summarizes recent residential/commercial development since 2011 to present and any known or anticipated major residential/commercial development and major infrastructure development that has been identified in the next five years within the municipality. Refer to the map in Section 9.4.9 of this annex which illustrates the hazard areas along with the location of potential new development. Table 9.4-1. Growth and Development Property or Type Known Development (e.g. Res., # of Units / Address and/or Block & Hazard Description/Status of Name Comm.) Structures Lot Zone(s) Development Recent Development from 2011 to Present Hamilton Chase Residential 109 units Block 2154 – Lot 12.02 No Under Construction Panfilli Residential 21 units Block 2226 – Lot 1-18 No Under Construction Walmart Commercial 160,000 sq ft Block 1589 – Lot 167 No Under Construction Twin Ponds Residential 144 units Block 2173 – Lot 16 No Under Construction Homewood Suites Hotel 117 Rooms Block 2594 – Lot 17 No Completed 2015 DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update – Mercer County, New Jersey 9.4-1 June 2016 SECTION 9.4: TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON Property or Type Known Development (e.g. Res., # of Units / Address and/or Block & Hazard Description/Status of Name Comm.) Structures Lot Zone(s) Development Assisted Homestead 221,116 sq ft Block 2173 – Lot 8 No Under Construction Living Known or Anticipated Development in the Next Five (5) Years Sharbell Residential 55 Lots Block 2575 – Lot 47.01 Hewitt Square Residential 94 units Block 2176 – Lot 2 Sun Cap Warehouse 343,477 sq ft Block 2610 – Lot 26 IPT Warehouse 339,000 sq ft Block 2591 Lot1 * Only location-specific hazard zones or vulnerabilities identified. 9.4.3 NATURAL HAZARD EVENT HISTORY SPECIFIC TO THE MUNICIPALITY Mercer County has a history of natural and non-natural hazard events as detailed in Volume I, Section 5.0 of this plan. A summary of historical events is provided in each of the hazard profiles and includes a chronology of events that have affected the County and its municipalities. For the purpose of this plan update, events that have occurred in the County from 2008 to present were summarized to indicate the range and impact of hazard events in the community. Information regarding specific damages at the municipal level, is presented in the table below. This summary is based on reference material or local sources. For further details on these and additional events, refer to Volume I, Section 5.0 of this plan. Table 9.4-2. Hazard Event History FEMA Date(s) of Declaration # County Event Event Type (If Applicable) Designated? Summary of Damages/Losses This event led to numerous road closures due to heavy rains in conjunction with melting snow causing flooding. High winds associated with this storm caused downed trees and power lines, which resulted in power outages. There were volunteer evacuations and a resource center was available to residents. Public March 12 – Severe Storms assistance was requested for Categories A and B that April 15, DR-1897 Yes and Flooding totaled $85,761.20. The Water Pollution Control 2010 Department responded to numerous high water alarms at the sanitary pump stations. The police department continued to provide protective measures for multiple road closures, traffic control, etc. Barricades, traffic cones and video message boards were used to control vehicular traffic in the Township. Plowing operations, including snow plow contractors to clear 625 lane miles of roadway. Brine was placed on Severe Winter February 4, roadways prior to event. OEM command center open to Storm and DR-1954 Yes 2011 assist PD, Fire and EMS response to residents. Snowstorm Township requested public assistance for Category B totaling $425,357.23. Irene led to numerous road closures in the Township due to flooding and debris. Approximately 146 homes were affected by flooding. There were volunteer August 26 – Hurricane evacuations, a reception center was open and there was September 5, DR-4021 Yes Irene one medical fatality. Infrastructure damage in the 2011 Township included Tattletown Road near the bridge was washed out by flood water. Temporary repairs were made to make the roadway passable followed by DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update – Mercer County, New Jersey 9.4-2 June 2016 SECTION 9.4: TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON FEMA Date(s) of Declaration # County Event Event Type (If Applicable) Designated? Summary of Damages/Losses permanent repairs. The fire department completed 146 de-watering assignments, five water rescues, numerous assists with downed power lines, and transformer fires. The police department provided emergency protection for multiple road closures, traffic control, etc. Barricades, traffic cones and video message boards were used all over the Township to control traffic. Public assistance was requested for Category A, B, and C that totaled $157,311.52. Sandy led to voluntary evacuations, the opening of a reception center for residents, and the relocation of ambulances to the fire department. Due to the loss of power, there were many requests for assistance for low levels of oxygen. Three residents were transported to the hospital due to oxygen issues. The Township delivered water to the animal shelter for drinking water for the animals. A travel ban was in effect for the safety of the public. Multiple large trees fell and blocked roadways. This caused multiple power outages that lasted for up to 13 days in some areas of the Township. Three township-owned vehicles were damaged by fallen trees. A section of roof was torn off building #6 in the public works complex. Two schools had damage due to downed utility poles. During PDA, Township October 26 – Hurricane inspectors visited approximately 175 structures that November 8, DR-4086 Yes Sandy received damage including commercial buildings. Part 2012 of the roof was torn off the Winding Brook Apartments. The fire department completed 135 assignments, three water rescues, numerous assists with downed power lines, and transformer fires. The Township requested public assistance for Categories A, B and E totaling $1,303,542.09. Other damages noted by the Township included: seven traffic intersection lights were inoperable; police and sheriff officers were used to direct traffic; light plans were placed for the protection of officers; several of the sewage pumping stations were on generator power along with the police department and EOC; fuel truck was dispatched to maintain fuel levels for generators and light plants; debris dumpsters were placed in residential areas; Township collected debris for over 30 days. 9.4.4 HAZARD VULNERABILITIES AND RANKING The hazard profiles in Section 5.0 of this plan have detailed information regarding each plan participant’s vulnerability to the identified hazards. The risk ranking methodology is presented in Section 5.3. However, each municipality had the opportunity to adjust the final ranking based on municipal feedback. The following summarizes the hazard vulnerabilities and their ranking in the Township of Hamilton. For additional vulnerability information relevant to this jurisdiction, refer to Section 5.0. Hazard Risk/Vulnerability Risk Ranking The table below summarizes the hazard risk/vulnerability rankings of potential hazards for the Township of Hamilton. DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update – Mercer County, New Jersey 9.4-3 June 2016 SECTION 9.4: TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON Table 9.4-3. Hazard Risk/Vulnerability Risk Ranking Risk Ranking Probability Score Estimate of Potential Dollar Losses to of (Probability
Recommended publications
  • North Atlantic Ocean
    210 ¢ U.S. Coast Pilot 3, Chapter 6 26 SEP 2021 75°W 74°30'W Chart Coverage in Coast Pilot 3—Chapter 6 NOAA’s Online Interactive Chart Catalog has complete chart coverage http://www.charts.noaa.gov/InteractiveCatalog/nrnc.shtml Trenton 75°30'W 12314 P ENNSYLV ANIA Philadelphia 40°N 12313 Camden E R I V R E R Wilmington A W A L E D NEW JERSEY 12312 SALEM RIVER CHESAPEAKE & DELAWARE CANAL 39°30'N 12304 12311 Atlantic City MAURICE RIVER DELAWARE BAY 39°N 12214 CAPE MAY INLET DELAWARE 12216 Lewes Cape Henlopen NORTH ATL ANTIC OCEAN INDIAN RIVER INLET 38°30'N 26 SEP 2021 U.S. Coast Pilot 3, Chapter 6 ¢ 211 Delaware Bay (1) This chapter describes Delaware Bay and River and (10) Mileages shown in this chapter, such as Mile 0.9E their navigable tributaries and includes an explanation of and Mile 12W, are the nautical miles above the Delaware the Traffic Separation Scheme at the entrance to the bay. Capes (or “the Capes”), referring to a line from Cape May Major ports covered are Wilmington, Chester, Light to the tip of Cape Henlopen. The letters N, S, E, or Philadelphia, Camden and Trenton, with major facilities W, following the numbers, denote by compass points the at Delaware City, Deepwater Point and Marcus Hook. side of the river where each feature is located. Also described are Christina River, Salem River, and (11) The approaches to Delaware Bay have few off-lying Schuylkill River, the principal tributaries of Delaware dangers. River and other minor waterways, including Mispillion, (12) The 100-fathom curve is 50 to 75 miles off Delaware Maurice and Cohansey Rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Resource Inventory for Bordentown Township, Burlington County, New Jersey
    Created in 1965, the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) is an interstate, intercounty and intercity agency that provides continuing, comprehensive and coordinated planning to shape a vision for the future growth of the Delaware Valley region. The region includes Bucks, Chester, Delaware, and Montgomery counties, as well as the City of Philadelphia, in Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester and Mercer counties in New Jersey. DVRPC provides technical assistance and services; conducts high priority studies that respond to the requests and demands of member state and local governments; fosters cooperation among various constituents to forge a consensus on diverse regional issues; determines and meets the needs of the private sector; and practices public outreach efforts to promote two-way communication and public awareness of regional issues and the Commission. Our logo is adapted from the official DVRPC seal, and is designed as a stylized image of the Delaware Valley. The outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole, while the diagonal bar signifies the Delaware River. The two adjoining crescents represent the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of New Jersey. DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding sources including federal grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation=s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Pennsylvania and New Jersey departments of transportation, as well as by DVRPC=s state and local member governments. The authors, however, are solely responsible for its findings and conclusions, which may not represent the official views or policies of the funding agencies. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................ 6 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 7 BRIEF TOWNSHIP HISTORY.................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Trenton Complex
    Transportation Research Record 1033 93 Making the Environmental Process Work: The Trenton Complex THOMAS L. WECK, JOHN A. HOTOPP, A. BROOK CROSSAN, and HOW ARD ZAHN ABSTRACT The Environmental Impact Statement on the Trenton Complex Highway System is a classic example of how, through extensive and meaningful coordination, a highly complex and controversial highway project can move through the process of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to implementation with the full sup­ port of all review agencies as well as those that issue permits. Throughout the NEPA process, the Trenton Complex received broad-based public support while simultaneously being shadowed by well-defined and intricately interrelated environmental concerns--mainly those related to cultural resources and wetlands. The challenge was to minimize or eliminate these and other environ­ mental problems while simultaneously maintaining public support, keeping construction cost down, minimizing delays, and refraining from creating new environmental problems as a result of resolving existing ones. What finally evolved during the coordination process was an ingenious compromise, carefully integrated with the design efforts, which resulted in substantial cost savings while simultaneously protecting otherwise adversely impacted archaeological resources and wetlands areas. Many review agencies such as the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation have referred to the Trenton complex project as a textbook case of how environmental studies on transportation and other devel­ opment projects should be carried out. This praise illustrates that the team concept used for this project, with all participants pulling together toward a common goal, can succeed even in projects as environmentally challenging as the Trenton Complex. Completion of the final links of the I-195/I-295, NJ Statement (EIS) issued in 1976.
    [Show full text]
  • The ABBOTT FARM NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK INTERPRETIVE PLAN
    THE ABBOTT FARM NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK INTERPRETIVE PLAN CULTUral RESOUrcE TECHnical docUMENT HAMILTON TOWNSHIP, MERCER COUNTY BORDENTOWN TOWNSHIP AND THE CITY OF BORDENTOWN, BURLINGTON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY Prepared for: COUNTY OF MERCER Prepared by: HUNTER RESEARCH, INC. AUGUST 2009 THE ABBOTT FARM NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK INTERPRETIVE PLAN CULTUral RESOUrcE TECHnical docUMENT HAMILTON TOWNSHIP, MERCER COUNTY BORDENTOWN TOWNSHIP AND THE CITY OF BORDENTOWN, BURLINGTON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY Prepared For: County of Mercer Prepared By: Richard Hunter, Principal Damon Tvaryanas, Principal Architectural Historian/Historian with David Byers, Landscape Architect R. Michael Stewart, Ph.D., Prehistorian AUGUST 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research undertaken in support of this document, and the production of the document itself, have been fund- ed by a historic site management grant from the Garden State Historic Preservation Trust Fund (administered by the New Jersey Historic Trust) and by a grant from the Mercer County Open Space Preservation Trust Fund. Compiling and analyzing the voluminous cultural resources data that pertains to the Abbott Farm National Historic Landmark (AFNHL) has been an exceptionally daunting task that would have been well nigh impos- sible to complete without the input and assistance of several valued colleagues, amongst whom are government officials, cultural resource and planning professionals, scholars and knowledgeable residents. Within Mercer County government we offer profound thanks to Lisa Fritzinger, Supervising Planner, and Marisa Wieczorek, Senior Planner, of the Planning Division. Throughout this exercise, Lisa and Marisa have kept us on task, provided us with critical background information and mapping, and shared their immense enthusiasm for the cultural and natural history of the landmark.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamilton-Trenton Marsh Wildlife
    The Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission is dedicated to uniting the region’s elected officials, planning professionals, and the public with a common vision of making a great region even greater. Shaping the way we live, work, and play, DVRPC builds consensus on improving transportation, promoting smart growth, protecting the environment, and enhancing the economy. We serve a diverse region of nine counties: Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, and Philadelphia in Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester, and Mercer in New Jersey. DVRPC is the federally designated Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Greater Philadelphia Region — leading the way to a better future. The symbol in our logo is adapted from the official DVRPC seal and is designed as a stylized image of the Delaware Valley. The outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole while the diagonal bar signifies the Delaware River. The two adjoining crescents represent the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of New Jersey. DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding sources including federal grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Pennsylvania and New Jersey departments of transportation, as well as by DVRPC’s state and local member governments. The authors, however, are solely responsible for the findings and conclusions herein, which may not represent the official views or policies of the funding agencies. DVRPC fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. DVRPC’s website (www.dvrpc.org) may be translated into multiple languages.
    [Show full text]