DOCSLIB.ORG

Blind River Refinery Licence Renewal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Blind River Refinery Licence Renewal CAMECO CORPORATION FUEL SERVICES DIVISION 2022 LICENCE RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR THE BLIND RIVER REFINERY SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 2022 LICENCE RENEWAL APPLICATION BLIND RIVER REFINERY SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................1 1.1 CAMECO CORPORATION AND THE FUEL SERVICES DIVISION .............................................................1 1.2 BLIND RIVER REFINERY .....................................................................................................................2 1.3 APPLICATION FOR LICENCE RENEWAL ...............................................................................................2 1.4 LICENSING BASIS ...............................................................................................................................3 1.5 APPLICATION FORMAT .......................................................................................................................4 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS AND OTHER LICENSED ACTIVITIES .........................5 2.1 ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES .............................................................................................5 2.2 FACILITY LOCATION AND LAYOUT ....................................................................................................5 2.3 PROCESSES AND MATERIALS .............................................................................................................9 2.3.1 Uranium Trioxide (UO 3) ......................................................................................................... 9 2.3.2 Other Activities Supporting UO 3 Operations........................................................................ 10 2.3.3 Nuclear Substances and Radiation Devices .......................................................................... 11 2.4 PUBLIC INFORMATION PROGRAM ..................................................................................................... 11 2.4.1 Public Engagement Strategies .............................................................................................. 11 2.4.2 Target Audiences .................................................................................................................. 12 2.4.3 Engagement Mechanisms ..................................................................................................... 12 2.4.4 Information Products ............................................................................................................ 13 2.4.5 Indigenous Engagement ........................................................................................................ 14 2.5 FINANCIAL GUARANTEE .................................................................................................................. 15 3.0 SITE PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW .......................................................................................... 16 3.1 PERFORMANCE IN THE CURRENT LICENCE PERIOD .......................................................................... 16 3.2 FACILITY OPERATION AND PHYSICAL DESIGN ................................................................................. 16 3.3 RADIATION PROTECTION ................................................................................................................. 17 3.4 CONVENTIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ............................................................................................ 17 3.5 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ........................................................................................................ 17 3.6 PUBLIC INFORMATION AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ................................................................. 18 4.0 SAFETY AND CONTROL AREAS .............................................................................................. 19 4.1 MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ................................................................................................................... 19 4.1.1 Organizational Structure ....................................................................................................... 20 4.1.2 Safety, Health, Environment and Quality (SHEQ) Policy .................................................... 23 4.1.3 Safety Culture ....................................................................................................................... 23 4.2 HUMAN PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT ........................................................................................... 24 4.2.1 Training Program .................................................................................................................. 24 4.3 OPERATING PERFORMANCE ............................................................................................................. 25 4.3.1 Operating Limits ................................................................................................................... 25 4.3.2 Operating Plan ...................................................................................................................... 25 4.3.3 Reporting Requirements ....................................................................................................... 26 4.3.4 Regulated Activities.............................................................................................................. 26 4.4 SAFETY ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................... 27 4.4.1 Safety Analysis Report ......................................................................................................... 27 4.5 PHYSICAL DESIGN ............................................................................................................................ 28 4.5.1 Facility Design ...................................................................................................................... 29 4.5.2 Facility and Process Changes ............................................................................................... 29 4.5.3 Third Party Review for Fire Protection ................................................................................ 29 4.5.4 Pressure Boundary Program ................................................................................................. 29 4.6 FITNESS FOR SERVICE ...................................................................................................................... 30 i 2022 LICENCE RENEWAL APPLICATION BLIND RIVER REFINERY SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 4.6.1 Maintenance Program ........................................................................................................... 30 4.6.2 In-service Inspection Program .............................................................................................. 30 4.6.3 Periodic Inspection and Testing for Fire Protection Systems ............................................... 30 4.7 RADIATION PROTECTION ................................................................................................................. 30 4.7.1 Radiation Protection Program ............................................................................................... 31 4.7.2 Potential Radiological Hazards ............................................................................................. 31 4.7.3 In-Plant Monitoring .............................................................................................................. 32 4.7.4 Nuclear Energy Workers ...................................................................................................... 32 4.7.5 Personal Dosimetry ............................................................................................................... 33 4.7.6 External Dosimetry ............................................................................................................... 33 4.7.7 Internal Dosimetry ................................................................................................................ 33 4.7.8 Urine Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 34 4.7.9 Lung Counting ...................................................................................................................... 34 4.7.10 Contamination Control ......................................................................................................... 35 4.7.11 Monitoring at the Point of Final Exit .................................................................................... 35 4.7.12 Radioisotope Control ............................................................................................................ 35 4.8 CONVENTIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ............................................................................................ 35 4.8.1 Conventional Safety Program ............................................................................................... 36 4.8.2 Hazards ................................................................................................................................. 36 4.8.3 Work Controls ...................................................................................................................... 37 4.8.4 Health and Safety Committee ............................................................................................... 37 4.9 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION .......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Manulife Global Fund Unaudited Semi-Annual Report
    Unaudited Semi-Annual Report Manulife Global Fund Société d'Investissement à Capital Variable for the six month period ended 31 December 2020 No subscription can be received on the basis of nancial reports. Subscriptions are only valid if made on the bases of the current prospectus, accompanied by the latest annual report and semi-annual report if published thereaer. SICAV R.C.S Luxembourg B 26 141 Contents Directors ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Management and Administration ............................................................................................................. 2 Directors’ Report ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Statement of Net Assets ........................................................................................................................... 10 Statement of Changes in Net Assets ........................................................................................................ 15 Statement of Operations ........................................................................................................................... 20 Statistical Information ............................................................................................................................... 25 Statement of Changes in Shares .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • View of the Extant Literature and a De- There Is Widespread Interest in Social Responsibility Scription of Our Research Methods, Our Findings Suggest Reporting”
    Fuller International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility (2018) 3:12 International Journal of https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-018-0034-3 Corporate Social Responsibility ORIGINAL ARTICLE Open Access Letters from the top: a comparative control group study of CEO letters to stakeholders Mark Fuller Abstract This paper examines corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting with a focus on communications from management. It examines letters from the board chair, CEO and/or senior CSR lead to gain a deeper understanding of how firms disclose their past performance and whether firms noted for the CSR reporting disclose their information in meaningfully different ways compared to other firms. Using a comparative analysis between treatment and control groups, we explore whether there is a difference in reporting approaches between a sample of highly regarded CSR reporters vis-à-vis firms recognized for their high profitability. Our findings suggest CSR-recognized firms discuss sustainability issues in greater quantity but without much meaningful difference in quality. We postulate a parabolic relationship between report quality and cost to explain this situation, discussing both the theoretical and the practical implications. Keywords: Corporate social responsibility, CSR reporting, CEO communications, Voluntary reporting, Mandatory reporting, Stakeholder management, Letters to stakeholders, Canada Introduction Management’s discussion and analysis of a firm’sCSR CSR reporting activities have been explored in many con- activities are a critical component within a firm’s texts, with stakeholder theory playing a prominent role in reporting activities. It is the focal point of the reporting both theory and practice (Waddock 2004; Reynolds and effort whereby management can discuss past CSR per- Yuthas 2008; Hahn and Lülfs 2014; Orzes et al.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Canada's Uranium Industry
    6-Orono Weekly Times, Wednesday, August 24, 1983 to increase • "efficiency, pro­ cesses were unproved and the New Recreation Building for senior citizens ’ plant was enlarged from a random collection of buildings to a sophisticated complex. In 1954 the refinery Orono was overhauled and a new , system installed which enabl ­ ed the company to obtain a Building purified metal product. Four -, years later its uranium metal Contractor plant began production of a ; fuel to be used in research Brick - Block - Concrete | reactors, such as those at Stone Work Chalk River, and in,reactors which created electrical Carpentry - Cabinet energy. Previously this fuel Work had had to be imported front the United States. Floors - Tile Eldorado also continued to play a dominant regulating Phbne 983-5444 ORONO role in the industry. Passage of the Atomic Energy Con ­ trol Act in 1946 evidenced the Canadian government ’s in : ' terest in supervising the development, application and Clarke Public The new recreation Lodge in Orono now pro­ area in the basement for shuf­ pleted at a cost of $100,000 use of atomic energy. For building officially opened' on vides facilities of a banquet fle board, pool table, hand which money was supplied by . over a decade it used the firm LIBRARY and assembly hall, a kitchen, shuffle board and darts. the Durham County Senior as the producer-consumer in ­ Monday night at the Durham Tuesday 1-8 p.m. a laundry and a recreational The new hall was com­ Citizen ’s Lodge. termediary in the marketing County Senior Citizen ’s Wednesday 1-5p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Management Proxy Circular May 1, 2014
    NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND MANAGEMENT PROXY CIRCULAR MAY 1, 2014 WHAT’S INSIDE Page Page 1 Chairman’s message to shareholders 51 Performance graph 2 Notice of annual meeting of shareholders 53 Named executive officer compensation for 2013 5 General information 59 Compensation details 6 Business of the meeting 59 Summary compensation table 1. Financial statements 61 Incentive Plan Awards 2. Appointment of auditors 62 Management stock option incentive plan 3. Advisory vote on executive compensation 64 Pension plan benefits 4. Election of directors 67 Termination and change in control benefits 8 Questions and answers about voting and proxies 71 Indebtedness of directors and 12 Nominees for election to the board executive officers 28 Directors’ compensation 71 Directors’ and officers’ insurance 32 Board and Committees 71 Shareholder proposals 38 2013 Executive compensation 71 Availability of documents Letter to shareholders 72 Directors’ approval 39 Statement of executive compensation 73 Schedule “A” – Statement of 42 Compensation discussion and analysis Corporate Governance 43 Compensation elements for executive officers 86 Schedule “B” – Comparator Group 45 2013 Compensation and performance 87 Schedule “C” – Director Independence 48 Other key compensation policies of the company CANADIAN PACIFIC March 3, 2014 DEAR FELLOW SHAREHOLDER, It is my pleasure to invite you to the annual meeting of shareholders of Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, to be held at the Telus Convention Centre, Macleod Hall, 120 – 9th Avenue S.E., Calgary, Alberta on Thursday, May 1, 2014 at 9:00 am local time. Canadian Pacific’s performance over this past year has been remarkable. The benefits of our ongoing cultural change are demonstrated through CP’s improved service and positive direction.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiation Protection Program
    Radiation Protection Program Introduction Radiation Protection The Cameco Corporation (Cameco) Cigar Lake The Cigar Lake RPP discusses radiation Operation (Cigar Lake) is located approximately protection measures employed at Cigar Lake. At 660 kilometers (km) north of Saskatoon, a high level, the radiation protection measures Saskatchewan. Cigar Lake holds a Uranium are as follows: Mine Licence (Licence) from the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) to prepare Radiation Exposure Control: a site for, construct, operate, modify and • Controls such as exposure monitoring, decommission a nuclear facility for mining radiation work permits, personal protective uranium ore, as well as an Approval to Operate equipment (e.g.: coveralls, gloves, safety Pollutant Control Facilities (Approval to footwear, safety glasses and respiratory Operate) from the Saskatchewan Ministry of protection) and radiation safety training are Environment (SMOE). used to keep radiation exposures at Cigar The CNSC requires operators of licensed nuclear Lake as low as reasonably achievable; facilities to prepare a Radiation Protection Radiation Code of Practice: Program (RPP) to manage workplace radiation protection issues and keep radiation exposures as • Action levels for radiation concentrations or low as reasonably achievable. levels at Cigar Lake are detailed in a The Cigar Lake RPP provides a summary of the radiation code of practice (RCOP) within the Cigar Lake RPP; radiation protection activities for Cigar Lake. • The Cigar Lake RPP was developed in The Cigar Lake RCOP describes the specific consideration of applicable regulatory actions to be taken in response to measured requirements, industry standards, Cameco radiations concentrations above the defined requirements and Cameco’s Safety, Health, action level; Environment and Quality (SHEQ) Policy.
    [Show full text]
  • MONTHLY ATHABASCA BASIN EXPLORATION UPDATE April 2020
    MONTHLY ATHABASCA BASIN EXPLORATION UPDATE April 2020 Could Cameco suspension kick-start the uranium sector? UxC Consulting Spot Price (US$) Source: Resource World February 28, 2020 $24.75/lb U3O8 March 31, 2020 $27.25/lb U3O8 Cameco Corp. [CCO-TSX; CCJ-NYSE] is temporarily suspending production at its Cigar Lake uranium mine in northern Saskatchewan. It said the move is a safety precaution that stems Change of +2.50/lb U3O8 from the threat posed by the Coronavirus [COVID-19] pandemic. Cameco is one of the world’s leading uranium producers. Cigar Lake is the globe’s largest UxC Consulting Long-Term Price operating uranium mine and represents 100% of the company’s current output of 9.0 mil- (US$) lion pounds. Cigar Lake also accounts for 13% of the world’s mine supply and 10% of total February 28, 2020 $32.00/lb U3O8 supply, including secondary material. As result, the suspension at Cigar Lake is being viewed by analysts at Scotiabank as a po- March 31, 2020 $31.00/lb U3O8 tential turning point for the uranium sector, which has been locked in a bear market since a 2011 earthquake and tsunami in Japan disabled three reactors at the Fukushima nuclear Change of -$1.00/lb U3O8 plant, causing their cores to melt down, forcing Japan to shut down 50 nuclear reactors that remained intact. Key Basin Announcements Spot uranium is trading this week at US$24.10 a pound. That is down from US$72.63 a pound just prior to the Fukushima disaster, which prompted major producers like Cameco and Kazakh state-owned KazAtomProm, to shut down production and announce indefinite 03-09-2020: Skyharbour option partner layoffs.
    [Show full text]
  • Saskatchewan's Mining Supply Chain
    Saskatchewan Mining Supply Chain First in Canada and top ten in the world for mining investment the past six of seven years. Fraser Institute, Survey of Mining Companies 2019 Our Mining Industry Saskatchewan mineral sales totalled $7.9 billion in In addition, the province has deposits of copper, zinc, 2019. Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) estimates that nickel, rare earth minerals and platinum group metals Saskatchewan accounted for 14% of national sales value, third as well as various industrial minerals including sodium highest in Canada. sulphate and salt. The province is the largest potash producer in the world, Major Mining Companies Operating in Saskatchewan accounting for approximately one-third of total production • Nutrien in 2019, and hosting over half of the globe’s potash reserves. • Mosaic Company Saskatchewan is also one of the world’s largest producers of uranium, with the Athabasca Basin containing the largest • BHP Billiton Canada Inc. high-grade uranium deposits in the world. • K+S Potash Canada Saskatchewan is Canada’s third-largest producer of coal, • ORANO Canada producing an average of 10 million tonnes per year. • Cameco The province is also home to one of the world’s largest fields • Vale Limited of diamond-bearing kimberlite. This discovery has led to • Rio Tinto extensive exploration and evaluation. • Acron Saskatchewan has large underexplored areas with high gold potential. The Seabee Operation produced 112,137 ounces • Yancoal of gold in 2019, a record annual production up 17% for the previous year. saskatchewan.ca/invest
    [Show full text]
  • Public Confidence in the Management of Radioactive Waste: the Canadian Context
    Cov-Public Confidence Canadian 30/09/03 12:45 Page 1 Radioactive Waste Management Public Confidence in the Management of Radioactive Waste: The Canadian Context Workshop Proceedings Ottawa, Canada 14-18 October 2002 NUCLEAR•ENERGY•AGENCY Radioactive Waste Management Public Confidence in the Management of Radioactive Waste: The Canadian Context Workshop Proceedings Ottawa, Canada 14-18 October 2002 © OECD 2003 NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Pursuant to Article 1 of the Convention signed in Paris on 14th December 1960, and which came into force on 30th September 1961, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) shall promote policies designed: − to achieve the highest sustainable economic growth and employment and a rising standard of living in Member countries, while maintaining financial stability, and thus to contribute to the development of the world economy; − to contribute to sound economic expansion in Member as well as non-member countries in the process of economic development; and − to contribute to the expansion of world trade on a multilateral, non-discriminatory basis in accordance with international obligations. The original Member countries of the OECD are Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The following countries became Members subsequently through accession at the dates indicated hereafter: Japan (28th April 1964), Finland (28th January 1969), Australia (7th June 1971), New Zealand (29th May 1973), Mexico (18th May 1994), the Czech Republic (21st December 1995), Hungary (7th May 1996), Poland (22nd November 1996), Korea (12th December 1996) and the Slovak Republic (14 December 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Radioactive Waste in Canada 2016 Inventory of Radioactive Waste in Canada 2016 Ix X 1.0 INVENTORY of RADIOACTIVE WASTE in CANADA OVERVIEW
    Inventory of RADIOACTIVE WASTE in CANADA 2016 Inventory of RADIOACTIVE WASTE in CANADA 2016 Photograph contributors: Cameco Corp.: page ix OPG: page 34 Orano Canada: page x Cameco Corp.: page 47 BWX Technologies, Inc.: page 2 Cameco Corp.: page 48 OPG: page 14 OPG: page 50 OPG: page 23 Cameco Corp.: page 53 OPG: page 24 Cameco Corp.: page 54 BWX Technologies, Inc.: page 33 Cameco Corp.: page 62 For information regarding reproduction rights, contact Natural Resources Canada at [email protected]. Aussi disponible en français sous le titre : Inventaire des déchets radioactifs au Canada 2016. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Natural Resources, 2018 Cat. No. M134-48/2016E-PDF (Online) ISBN 978-0-660-26339-7 CONTENTS 1.0 INVENTORY OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE IN CANADA OVERVIEW ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 1�1 Radioactive waste definitions and categories �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 3 1�1�1 Processes that generate radioactive waste in canada ����������������������������� 3 1�1�2 Disused radioactive sealed sources ����������������������������������������� 6 1�2 Responsibility for radioactive waste �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 6 1�2�1 Regulation of radioactive
    [Show full text]
  • Women in Leadership at S&P/Tsx Companies
    WOMEN IN LEADERSHIP AT S&P/TSX COMPANIES Women in Leadership at WOMEN’S S&P/TSX Companies ECONOMIC Welcome to the first Progress Report of Women on Boards and Executive PARTICIPATION Teams for the companies in the S&P/TSX Composite Index, the headline AND LEADERSHIP index for the Canadian equity market. This report is a collaboration between Catalyst, a global nonprofit working with many of the world’s leading ARE ESSENTIAL TO companies to help build workplaces that work for women, and the 30% Club DRIVING BUSINESS Canada, the global campaign that encourages greater representation of PERFORMANCE women on boards and executive teams. AND ACHIEVING Women’s economic participation and leadership are essential to driving GENDER BALANCE business performance, and achieving gender balance on corporate boards ON CORPORATE and among executive ranks has become an economic imperative. As in all business ventures, a numeric goal provides real impetus for change, and our BOARDS collective goal is for 30% of board seats and C-Suites to be held by women by 2022. This report offers a snapshot of progress for Canada’s largest public companies from 2015 to 2019, using the S&P/TSX Composite Index, widely viewed as a barometer of the Canadian economy. All data was supplied by MarketIntelWorks, a data research and analytics firm with a focus on gender diversity, and is based on a review of 234 S&P/TSX Composite Index companies as of December 31, 2019. The report also provides a comparative perspective on progress for companies listed on the S&P/TSX Composite Index versus all disclosing companies on the TSX itself, signalling the amount of work that still needs to be done.
    [Show full text]
  • Cameco 2021 Management Proxy Circular
    What’s inside Message from the Chair of the Board and the CEO 1 ESG Content map 4 Notice of our 2021 annual meeting of shareholders 5 Management proxy circular 6 Business of the meeting 7 • Delivery of meeting materials 9 • Voting 9 About the nominated directors 17 • Director profiles • 2020 Meetings and attendance • Director compensation and share ownership Our board 32 • Board structure, composition and succession • Skills, attributes and experience • Board diversity • Board, committee and director assessments • Director development Our corporate governance 41 Key elements of our corporate governance 41 How the board operates 41 • Role of the board • Executive succession planning and leadership development • Internal controls Our expectations of directors 47 • Code of conduct and ethics • Serving on other boards • Board interlocks • Change in position Board independence standards 50 Stakeholder engagement 50 • Disclosure • Engagement with the investment community • Say on pay • How to engage with the board Voting results 53 Shareholder proposals 53 Advance notice by-law 53 Accessing our governance and other regulatory disclosure 53 Compliance 54 Governance guidelines 54 Board committees 55 • Committee responsibilities What’s inside • Committee membership • Committee chair rotation • Cross-committee attendance • Access to management and outside advisors • Committee reports Message from the Chair of Human Resources and 62 Compensation Committee Compensation discussion and analysis 65 Our 2020 named executive officers 66 Compensation governance
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography on Saskatchewan Uranium Inquiries and the Northern and Global Impact of the Uranium Industry
    University of Regina iNis-mf—13125 __ CA9200098 Prairie Justice Research Bibliography on Saskatchewan Uranium Inquiries and The Northern and Global Impact of the Uranium Industry :• IN THF PimhlC INTEREST BIBLIOGRAPHY ON SASKATCHEWAN URANIUM INQUIRIES AND THE NORTHERN AND GLOBAL IMPACT OF THE URANIUM INDUSTRY Jim Harding, B.A. (Hons.), M.A., Ph.D. Director, Prairie Justice Research Beryl Forgay, B.Ed., B.HE., M.A. Research Officer, Prairie Justice Research Mary Gianoli, B.Ed. Research Co-ordinator, Prairie Justice Research Cover Design: Rick Coffin Published by PRAIRIE JUSTICE RESEARCH 1988 SERIES: IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST (Research Report No. 1) Published by: Prairie Justice Research Room 515 Library Building University of Regina Regina, Saskatchewan Canada S4S OA2 Cataloguing in Publication Data Harding, Jim, 1941- Bibliography on Saskatchewan uranium inquiries and the northern and global impact of the uranium industry ISBN 0-7731-0052-0 I. Uranium mines and mining - Environmental aspects - Saskatchewan - Bibliography. 2. Uranium industry - Environmental aspects - Saskatchewan - Bibliography. 3. Uranium industry - Government policy - Saskatchewan - Bibliography. I. Forgay. Beryl, 1926- II. University of Regina. Prairie Justice Research. III. Title. Z6738.U7H37 1986 016.3637'384 C86-091166-: ISBN 0-7731-0135 (Set) This is a publication of Prairie Justice Research at the University of Regina. Prairie Justice Research is funded by an operating contract with the Ministry of the Solicitor General and has the capacity to conduct socio-legal research for a diverse range of constituencies. For further informaiton contact: Dr. Jim Harding Director Prairie Justice Research Library Building University of Regina Regina, Saskatchewan Canada S4S 0A2 (306) 584-4064 NOTE: This research project was funded through "Human Context of Science and Technology" strategic grants of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.
    [Show full text]