DOCSLIB.ORG

A Quantum Gravity Tensor Equation Formally Integrating General Relativity with Quantum Mechanics Abstract

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A quantum gravity tensor equation formally integrating general relativity with quantum mechanics XU DUAN Zhengzhou City Construction Engineering Foundation Institute - 450000 Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China Abstract Extending black-hole entropy to ordinary objects, we propose kinetic entropy tensor, based on which a quantum gravity tensor equation is established. Our investigation results indicate that if N=1 , the quantum gravity tensor equation returns to Schrödinger integral equation. When N becomes sufficiently large, it is equivalent to Einstein field equation. This illustrates formal unification and intrinsic compatibility of general relativity with quantum mechanics. The quantum gravity equation may be utilized to deduce general relativity, special relativity, Newtonian mechanics and quantum mechanics, which has paved the way for unification of theoretical physics. 1. Introduction The unification of general relativity and quantum mechanics, a long-standing unsolved difficult problem, is one of the most important frontier researches in theoretical physics. It has puzzled many famous grandmasters of science for decades, including Albert Einstein. A current viewpoint suggests that they are essentially contradictory in their ideas and explanation of our world. General relativity is a very effective theory concerning macroscopic objects, especially cosmology. But in contrast, quantum mechanics specializes in dealing with molecules and atoms. Both theories have their own scope of application, and seem to be incomplete. It appears that we can’t simply com- bine these two theories to create a single equation of quantum gravity. Although substantial exciting progresses, such as black hole entropy, holographic principle, M (superstring) theory and loop quantum gravity, have emerged in the domain of quantum gravity, yet up till now, all the attempts to discover a theory of formally unified and complete quantum gravity are far from succeeding. Inspired by black-hole thermodynamics, we propose in this paper kinetic entropy tensor and successfully con- struct a quantum gravity tensor equation, which could integrate Schrödinger equation with Einstein field equation self-consistently. This means general relativity and quantum mechanics have intrinsic compatibility, instead of be- ing irreconcilable with each other, as is thought previously. The quantum gravity equation may be utilized to de- duce general relativity, special relativity, Newtonian mechanics and quantum mechanics, which has paved the way for unification of theoretical physics. E-mail: [email protected] - 1 - 2. Derivation of kinetic entropy In 1976 William G. Unruh[1] put forward his famous Unruh effect，indicating that accelerated motion is equivalent to thermal radiation of black bodies. It gives a strong hint that temperature and entropy are closely re- lated to kinetics. However, previously the concept of entropy was only restricted to classical equilibrium state in thermodynamics. To deduce kinetic entropy, we need to take advantage of entropy force together with Unruh for- mula. Entropy force[2,3], as a real force driven by entropy changes of a system, could be written as follows: TdS FdR (1) among which, T and S represent temperature and entropy, respectively. F is entropy force and R is space coordinate. Unruh law[1] in quantum field theory is expressed by 1 a kT (2) 2 c where T is Unruh temperature and a is acceleration. k , and c are respectively Boltzmann constant, re- duced Planck constant and velocity of light in vacuum. By combining (1) with (2), we have: c MRTSc2 kT d = d (3) 2 Furthermore, we acquire: k dS 2 M c2 dR (4) c The integral form of kinetic entropy is: k S 2 MR c2 (5) c 3. Kinetic entropy and Unruh temperature of general objects Black-hole thermodynamics developed during 1970’s reveals that black holes possess temperature and entropy. In fact, general objects (not only black holes) also have kinetic entropy and Unruh temperature. So how to extend thermodynamics of black holes to general objects? First we introduce escape velocity v 2 GM R . It is not hard to find that energy U 、space R and escape velocity v could be generalized into the following relationship, which applies to an ordinary object. UR v2 2 (6) Ep x p 2c - 2 - 3 5 2 xP called Planck scale, xP G c , EP called Planck energy, EP c G , UM c , G representing uni- versal gravitational constant. In appendix (the last section), we will see that (6) could be derived directly from Friedmann equation in flat space-time. Based on (6), kinetic entropy and Unruh temperature of ordinary objects are easy to obtain, including black-hole entropy and black-hole temperature. Specifically speaking, putting (6) into (5), we obtain kinetic entropy of ordinary objects: 2 U R R v2 S 2 k = 2 k (7) 2 Ep xp x p 2c If v c , it’s just Bekenstein’s black-hole entropy[4]. 2 R R2 c 3 S k k (8) BH xp G Furthermore, by transformation of Unruh formula, we get: 2 c v (9) kTR 2 2 2c After (9) is plugged into (6), Unruh temperature of general objects is acquired: 2 2 2 Ep 1 v kT 2 2 (10) 2Mc 2c In particular, when v c , black-hole temperature derived by Hawking [5] is easily got from our method: E 2 c3 kT p = 8 Mc2 8 G M It is not hard to prove that kinetic entropy and Unruh temperature of general objects invariably satisfy the rela- tionship below, which is very useful in the deduction of Newton’s law later. 1 T S Mv2 (11) 2 4. Kinetic entropy tensor Maybe an important enlightenment of general relativity is that theories in the form of tensors are genuinely com- plete. The key to unification of general relativity and quantum mechanics lies in that kinetic entropy must be rewrit- ten as a second-order symmetrical tensor. How to determine the expressions of kinetic entropy tensor Sab ? Obviously by analogy with kinetic entropy (5), we presume kinetic entropy tensor Sab should be defined as: def k S 2 UIX (12) abc ab ab ab - 3 - 4 3 Here UTab ab r , and Tab denotes energy-momentum tensor. Xab stands for tensor of space-time 3 coordinate, and Iab is coefficient matrix. The next crucial step is to write out the specific components of Uab and Xab under Cartesian coordinate system, although they are arbitrary and depend on selection of metric tensor. But we know Uab has a standard form: v vxy v z 1 c c c 2 2 Mc Px c P y c P z c v vv v v v x xx y x z 2 2 2 2 Px c Mv x Mv x v y Mv x v z c c c c UP = Mc2 = Mc 2 abP c Mv v Mv2 Mv v v v v v2 v v ab y y x y y z y x y y y z 2 2 2 2 Pz c Mv z v x Mv z v y Mv z c c c c 2 v v vvy v z v z x z z c c2 c 2 c 2 To satisfy the covariant principle, we designate Xab adopt the same symmetrical form: vxvy v z ct x y z 1 c c c v vxy v z 2 x x x x vx v xvx v y v x v z c c c c c2 c 2 c 2 XPv = ct = ct abvxy v z 2 ab y y y y vy v x v y v y v y v z c c c c c2 c 2 c 2 vv v z zx z y z z v v vv v v2 c c c z x zy z z c c2 c 2 c 2 After repeated speculations and tentative calculations, an important matrix relation is ultimately obtained: v v vxy v z v x y v z 1 1 c c c c c c v 2 v v2v v v v - 0 0 0 v v 2 v v v v x xx y x z2c 2 x x x y x z c c2 c 2 c 2 c c 2 c 2 c 2 0 1 0 0 2 2 vvvvvvyxyyyz vvvvvv yxyyyz 0 0 1 0 c c2 c 2 c 2 c c 2 c 2 c 2 0 0 0 1 v v2 v v 2 vz v x v zy z v z v z v x v z y z v z c c2 c 2 c 2 c c 2 c 2 c 2 v vxy v z 1 c c c 2 v v vx v xx y v x v z v 2 c c2 c 2 c 2 = 2 2 2c vy v x v y v y v y v z 2 2 2 c c c c v v 2 vz v x v zy z v z 2 2 2 c c c c So we learn proper choice of coefficient matrix Iab helps to make Sab , Uab and Xab always covariant. Hence coefficient matrix Iab is determined as follows: v 2 PPPabI ab ab = 2 ab 2c - 4 - Or v2 -2 0 0 0 2c Iab 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 4 If we employ Bits number (or degree of freedom) tensor Nab to fulfill the quantization of entropy: Sab N ab k then there is: 2UIXNab ab ab = ab c (13) We have actually established a half of the quantum gravity equation. 5. Wave function tensor and kinetic entropy tensor Is there any correlation between kinetic entropy and wave function? Our investigation offers a definite answer.
Recommended publications
  • A Mathematical Derivation of the General Relativistic Schwarzschild

    A Mathematical Derivation of the General Relativistic Schwarzschild

    A Mathematical Derivation of the General Relativistic Schwarzschild Metric An Honors thesis presented to the faculty of the Departments of Physics and Mathematics East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Honors Scholar and Honors-in-Discipline Programs for a Bachelor of Science in Physics and Mathematics by David Simpson April 2007 Robert Gardner, Ph.D. Mark Giroux, Ph.D. Keywords: differential geometry, general relativity, Schwarzschild metric, black holes ABSTRACT The Mathematical Derivation of the General Relativistic Schwarzschild Metric by David Simpson We briefly discuss some underlying principles of special and general relativity with the focus on a more geometric interpretation. We outline Einstein’s Equations which describes the geometry of spacetime due to the influence of mass, and from there derive the Schwarzschild metric. The metric relies on the curvature of spacetime to provide a means of measuring invariant spacetime intervals around an isolated, static, and spherically symmetric mass M, which could represent a star or a black hole. In the derivation, we suggest a concise mathematical line of reasoning to evaluate the large number of cumbersome equations involved which was not found elsewhere in our survey of the literature. 2 CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................. 2 1 Introduction to Relativity ...................... 4 1.1 Minkowski Space ....................... 6 1.2 What is a black hole? ..................... 11 1.3 Geodesics and Christoffel Symbols ............. 14 2 Einstein’s Field Equations and Requirements for a Solution .17 2.1 Einstein’s Field Equations .................. 20 3 Derivation of the Schwarzschild Metric .............. 21 3.1 Evaluation of the Christoffel Symbols .......... 25 3.2 Ricci Tensor Components .................
  • Kaluza-Klein Gravity, Concentrating on the General Rel- Ativity, Rather Than Particle Physics Side of the Subject

    Kaluza-Klein Gravity, Concentrating on the General Rel- Ativity, Rather Than Particle Physics Side of the Subject

    Kaluza-Klein Gravity J. M. Overduin Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 3055, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, V8W 3P6 and P. S. Wesson Department of Physics, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1 and Gravity Probe-B, Hansen Physics Laboratories, Stanford University, Stanford, California, U.S.A. 94305 Abstract We review higher-dimensional unified theories from the general relativity, rather than the particle physics side. Three distinct approaches to the subject are identi- fied and contrasted: compactified, projective and noncompactified. We discuss the cosmological and astrophysical implications of extra dimensions, and conclude that none of the three approaches can be ruled out on observational grounds at the present time. arXiv:gr-qc/9805018v1 7 May 1998 Preprint submitted to Elsevier Preprint 3 February 2008 1 Introduction Kaluza’s [1] achievement was to show that five-dimensional general relativity contains both Einstein’s four-dimensional theory of gravity and Maxwell’s the- ory of electromagnetism. He however imposed a somewhat artificial restriction (the cylinder condition) on the coordinates, essentially barring the fifth one a priori from making a direct appearance in the laws of physics. Klein’s [2] con- tribution was to make this restriction less artificial by suggesting a plausible physical basis for it in compactification of the fifth dimension. This idea was enthusiastically received by unified-field theorists, and when the time came to include the strong and weak forces by extending Kaluza’s mechanism to higher dimensions, it was assumed that these too would be compact. This line of thinking has led through eleven-dimensional supergravity theories in the 1980s to the current favorite contenders for a possible “theory of everything,” ten-dimensional superstrings.
  • Conformal Symmetry in Field Theory and in Quantum Gravity

    Conformal Symmetry in Field Theory and in Quantum Gravity

    universe Review Conformal Symmetry in Field Theory and in Quantum Gravity Lesław Rachwał Instituto de Física, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília DF 70910-900, Brazil; [email protected] Received: 29 August 2018; Accepted: 9 November 2018; Published: 15 November 2018 Abstract: Conformal symmetry always played an important role in field theory (both quantum and classical) and in gravity. We present construction of quantum conformal gravity and discuss its features regarding scattering amplitudes and quantum effective action. First, the long and complicated story of UV-divergences is recalled. With the development of UV-finite higher derivative (or non-local) gravitational theory, all problems with infinities and spacetime singularities might be completely solved. Moreover, the non-local quantum conformal theory reveals itself to be ghost-free, so the unitarity of the theory should be safe. After the construction of UV-finite theory, we focused on making it manifestly conformally invariant using the dilaton trick. We also argue that in this class of theories conformal anomaly can be taken to vanish by fine-tuning the couplings. As applications of this theory, the constraints of the conformal symmetry on the form of the effective action and on the scattering amplitudes are shown. We also remark about the preservation of the unitarity bound for scattering. Finally, the old model of conformal supergravity by Fradkin and Tseytlin is briefly presented. Keywords: quantum gravity; conformal gravity; quantum field theory; non-local gravity; super- renormalizable gravity; UV-finite gravity; conformal anomaly; scattering amplitudes; conformal symmetry; conformal supergravity 1. Introduction From the beginning of research on theories enjoying invariance under local spacetime-dependent transformations, conformal symmetry played a pivotal role—first introduced by Weyl related changes of meters to measure distances (and also due to relativity changes of periods of clocks to measure time intervals).
  • Unification of Gravity and Quantum Theory Adam Daniels Old Dominion University, Adani005@Odu.Edu

    Unification of Gravity and Quantum Theory Adam Daniels Old Dominion University, [email protected]

    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Faculty-Sponsored Student Research Electrical & Computer Engineering 2017 Unification of Gravity and Quantum Theory Adam Daniels Old Dominion University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/engineering_students Part of the Elementary Particles and Fields and String Theory Commons, Engineering Physics Commons, and the Quantum Physics Commons Repository Citation Daniels, Adam, "Unification of Gravity and Quantum Theory" (2017). Faculty-Sponsored Student Research. 1. https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/engineering_students/1 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Electrical & Computer Engineering at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty-Sponsored Student Research by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Unification of Gravity and Quantum Theory Adam D. Daniels [email protected] Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Old Dominion University Norfolk, Virginia, United States Abstract- An overview of the four fundamental forces of objects falling on earth. Newton’s insight was that the force that physics as described by the Standard Model (SM) and prevalent governs matter here on Earth was the same force governing the unifying theories beyond it is provided. Background knowledge matter in space. Another critical step forward in unification was of the particles governing the fundamental forces is provided, accomplished in the 1860s when James C. Maxwell wrote down as it will be useful in understanding the way in which the his famous Maxwell’s Equations, showing that electricity and unification efforts of particle physics has evolved, either from magnetism were just two facets of a more fundamental the SM, or apart from it.
  • Introductory Lectures on Quantum Field Theory

    Introductory Lectures on Quantum Field Theory

    Introductory Lectures on Quantum Field Theory a b L. Álvarez-Gaumé ∗ and M.A. Vázquez-Mozo † a CERN, Geneva, Switzerland b Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain Abstract In these lectures we present a few topics in quantum field theory in detail. Some of them are conceptual and some more practical. They have been se- lected because they appear frequently in current applications to particle physics and string theory. 1 Introduction These notes are based on lectures delivered by L.A.-G. at the 3rd CERN–Latin-American School of High- Energy Physics, Malargüe, Argentina, 27 February–12 March 2005, at the 5th CERN–Latin-American School of High-Energy Physics, Medellín, Colombia, 15–28 March 2009, and at the 6th CERN–Latin- American School of High-Energy Physics, Natal, Brazil, 23 March–5 April 2011. The audience on all three occasions was composed to a large extent of students in experimental high-energy physics with an important minority of theorists. In nearly ten hours it is quite difficult to give a reasonable introduction to a subject as vast as quantum field theory. For this reason the lectures were intended to provide a review of those parts of the subject to be used later by other lecturers. Although a cursory acquaintance with the subject of quantum field theory is helpful, the only requirement to follow the lectures is a working knowledge of quantum mechanics and special relativity. The guiding principle in choosing the topics presented (apart from serving as introductions to later courses) was to present some basic aspects of the theory that present conceptual subtleties.
  • Post-Newtonian Approximation

    Post-Newtonian Approximation

    Post-Newtonian gravity and gravitational-wave astronomy Polarization waveforms in the SSB reference frame Relativistic binary systems Effective one-body formalism Post-Newtonian Approximation Piotr Jaranowski Faculty of Physcis, University of Bia lystok,Poland 01.07.2013 P. Jaranowski School of Gravitational Waves, 01{05.07.2013, Warsaw Post-Newtonian gravity and gravitational-wave astronomy Polarization waveforms in the SSB reference frame Relativistic binary systems Effective one-body formalism 1 Post-Newtonian gravity and gravitational-wave astronomy 2 Polarization waveforms in the SSB reference frame 3 Relativistic binary systems Leading-order waveforms (Newtonian binary dynamics) Leading-order waveforms without radiation-reaction effects Leading-order waveforms with radiation-reaction effects Post-Newtonian corrections Post-Newtonian spin-dependent effects 4 Effective one-body formalism EOB-improved 3PN-accurate Hamiltonian Usage of Pad´eapproximants EOB flexibility parameters P. Jaranowski School of Gravitational Waves, 01{05.07.2013, Warsaw Post-Newtonian gravity and gravitational-wave astronomy Polarization waveforms in the SSB reference frame Relativistic binary systems Effective one-body formalism 1 Post-Newtonian gravity and gravitational-wave astronomy 2 Polarization waveforms in the SSB reference frame 3 Relativistic binary systems Leading-order waveforms (Newtonian binary dynamics) Leading-order waveforms without radiation-reaction effects Leading-order waveforms with radiation-reaction effects Post-Newtonian corrections Post-Newtonian spin-dependent effects 4 Effective one-body formalism EOB-improved 3PN-accurate Hamiltonian Usage of Pad´eapproximants EOB flexibility parameters P. Jaranowski School of Gravitational Waves, 01{05.07.2013, Warsaw Relativistic binary systems exist in nature, they comprise compact objects: neutron stars or black holes. These systems emit gravitational waves, which experimenters try to detect within the LIGO/VIRGO/GEO600 projects.
  • Gravity, Inertia, and Quantum Vacuum Zero Point Fields

    Gravity, Inertia, and Quantum Vacuum Zero Point Fields

    Foundations of Physics, Vol.31,No. 5, 2001 Gravity, Inertia, and Quantum Vacuum Zero Point Fields James F. Woodward1 Received July 27, 2000 Over the past several years Haisch, Rueda, and others have made the claim that the origin of inertial reaction forces can be explained as the interaction of electri- cally charged elementary particles with the vacuum electromagnetic zero-point field expected on the basis of quantum field theory. After pointing out that this claim, in light of the fact that the inertial masses of the hadrons reside in the electrically chargeless, photon-like gluons that bind their constituent quarks, is untenable, the question of the role of quantum zero-point fields generally in the origin of inertia is explored. It is shown that, although non-gravitational zero-point fields might be the cause of the gravitational properties of normal matter, the action of non-gravitational zero-point fields cannot be the cause of inertial reac- tion forces. The gravitational origin of inertial reaction forces is then briefly revisited. Recent claims critical of the gravitational origin of inertial reaction forces by Haisch and his collaborators are then shown to be without merit. 1. INTRODUCTION Several years ago Haisch, Rueda, and Puthoff (1) (hereafter, HRP) pub- lished a lengthy paper in which they claimed that a substantial part, indeed perhaps all of normal inertial reaction forces could be understood as the action of the electromagnetic zero-point field (EZPF), expected on the basis of quantum field theory, on electric charges of normal matter. In several subsequent papers Haisch and Rueda particularly have pressed this claim, making various modifications to the fundamental argument to try to deflect several criticisms.
  • Loop Quantum Cosmology, Modified Gravity and Extra Dimensions

    Loop Quantum Cosmology, Modified Gravity and Extra Dimensions

    universe Review Loop Quantum Cosmology, Modified Gravity and Extra Dimensions Xiangdong Zhang Department of Physics, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China; [email protected] Academic Editor: Jaume Haro Received: 24 May 2016; Accepted: 2 August 2016; Published: 10 August 2016 Abstract: Loop quantum cosmology (LQC) is a framework of quantum cosmology based on the quantization of symmetry reduced models following the quantization techniques of loop quantum gravity (LQG). This paper is devoted to reviewing LQC as well as its various extensions including modified gravity and higher dimensions. For simplicity considerations, we mainly focus on the effective theory, which captures main quantum corrections at the cosmological level. We set up the basic structure of Brans–Dicke (BD) and higher dimensional LQC. The effective dynamical equations of these theories are also obtained, which lay a foundation for the future phenomenological investigations to probe possible quantum gravity effects in cosmology. Some outlooks and future extensions are also discussed. Keywords: loop quantum cosmology; singularity resolution; effective equation 1. Introduction Loop quantum gravity (LQG) is a quantum gravity scheme that tries to quantize general relativity (GR) with the nonperturbative techniques consistently [1–4]. Many issues of LQG have been carried out in the past thirty years. In particular, among these issues, loop quantum cosmology (LQC), which is the cosmological sector of LQG has received increasing interest and has become one of the most thriving and fruitful directions of LQG [5–9]. It is well known that GR suffers singularity problems and this, in turn, implies that our universe also has an infinitely dense singularity point that is highly unphysical.
  • Electromagnetic Field Theory

    Electromagnetic Field Theory

    Electromagnetic Field Theory BO THIDÉ Υ UPSILON BOOKS ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD THEORY Electromagnetic Field Theory BO THIDÉ Swedish Institute of Space Physics and Department of Astronomy and Space Physics Uppsala University, Sweden and School of Mathematics and Systems Engineering Växjö University, Sweden Υ UPSILON BOOKS COMMUNA AB UPPSALA SWEDEN · · · Also available ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD THEORY EXERCISES by Tobia Carozzi, Anders Eriksson, Bengt Lundborg, Bo Thidé and Mattias Waldenvik Freely downloadable from www.plasma.uu.se/CED This book was typeset in LATEX 2" (based on TEX 3.14159 and Web2C 7.4.2) on an HP Visualize 9000⁄360 workstation running HP-UX 11.11. Copyright c 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 by Bo Thidé Uppsala, Sweden All rights reserved. Electromagnetic Field Theory ISBN X-XXX-XXXXX-X Downloaded from http://www.plasma.uu.se/CED/Book Version released 19th June 2004 at 21:47. Preface The current book is an outgrowth of the lecture notes that I prepared for the four-credit course Electrodynamics that was introduced in the Uppsala University curriculum in 1992, to become the five-credit course Classical Electrodynamics in 1997. To some extent, parts of these notes were based on lecture notes prepared, in Swedish, by BENGT LUNDBORG who created, developed and taught the earlier, two-credit course Electromagnetic Radiation at our faculty. Intended primarily as a textbook for physics students at the advanced undergradu- ate or beginning graduate level, it is hoped that the present book may be useful for research workers
  • Introduction to General Relativity

    Introduction to General Relativity

    INTRODUCTION TO GENERAL RELATIVITY Gerard 't Hooft Institute for Theoretical Physics Utrecht University and Spinoza Institute Postbox 80.195 3508 TD Utrecht, the Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] internet: http://www.phys.uu.nl/~thooft/ Version November 2010 1 Prologue General relativity is a beautiful scheme for describing the gravitational ¯eld and the equations it obeys. Nowadays this theory is often used as a prototype for other, more intricate constructions to describe forces between elementary particles or other branches of fundamental physics. This is why in an introduction to general relativity it is of importance to separate as clearly as possible the various ingredients that together give shape to this paradigm. After explaining the physical motivations we ¯rst introduce curved coordinates, then add to this the notion of an a±ne connection ¯eld and only as a later step add to that the metric ¯eld. One then sees clearly how space and time get more and more structure, until ¯nally all we have to do is deduce Einstein's ¯eld equations. These notes materialized when I was asked to present some lectures on General Rela- tivity. Small changes were made over the years. I decided to make them freely available on the web, via my home page. Some readers expressed their irritation over the fact that after 12 pages I switch notation: the i in the time components of vectors disappears, and the metric becomes the ¡ + + + metric. Why this \inconsistency" in the notation? There were two reasons for this. The transition is made where we proceed from special relativity to general relativity.
  • General Relativity Fall 2019 Lecture 11: the Riemann Tensor

    General Relativity Fall 2019 Lecture 11: the Riemann Tensor

    General Relativity Fall 2019 Lecture 11: The Riemann tensor Yacine Ali-Ha¨ımoud October 8th 2019 The Riemann tensor quantifies the curvature of spacetime, as we will see in this lecture and the next. RIEMANN TENSOR: BASIC PROPERTIES α γ Definition { Given any vector field V , r[αrβ]V is a tensor field. Let us compute its components in some coordinate system: σ σ λ σ σ λ r[µrν]V = @[µ(rν]V ) − Γ[µν]rλV + Γλ[µrν]V σ σ λ σ λ λ ρ = @[µ(@ν]V + Γν]λV ) + Γλ[µ @ν]V + Γν]ρV 1 = @ Γσ + Γσ Γρ V λ ≡ Rσ V λ; (1) [µ ν]λ ρ[µ ν]λ 2 λµν where all partial derivatives of V µ cancel out after antisymmetrization. σ Since the left-hand side is a tensor field and V is a vector field, we conclude that R λµν is a tensor field as well { this is the tensor division theorem, which I encourage you to think about on your own. You can also check that explicitly from the transformation law of Christoffel symbols. This is the Riemann tensor, which measures the non-commutation of second derivatives of vector fields { remember that second derivatives of scalar fields do commute, by assumption. It is completely determined by the metric, and is linear in its second derivatives. Expression in LICS { In a LICS the Christoffel symbols vanish but not their derivatives. Let us compute the latter: 1 1 @ Γσ = @ gσδ (@ g + @ g − @ g ) = ησδ (@ @ g + @ @ g − @ @ g ) ; (2) µ νλ 2 µ ν λδ λ νδ δ νλ 2 µ ν λδ µ λ νδ µ δ νλ since the first derivatives of the metric components (thus of its inverse as well) vanish in a LICS.
  • JOHN EARMAN* and CLARK GL YMUURT the GRAVITATIONAL RED SHIFT AS a TEST of GENERAL RELATIVITY: HISTORY and ANALYSIS

    JOHN EARMAN* and CLARK GL YMUURT the GRAVITATIONAL RED SHIFT AS a TEST of GENERAL RELATIVITY: HISTORY and ANALYSIS

    JOHN EARMAN* and CLARK GL YMUURT THE GRAVITATIONAL RED SHIFT AS A TEST OF GENERAL RELATIVITY: HISTORY AND ANALYSIS CHARLES St. John, who was in 1921 the most widely respected student of the Fraunhofer lines in the solar spectra, began his contribution to a symposium in Nncure on Einstein’s theories of relativity with the following statement: The agreement of the observed advance of Mercury’s perihelion and of the eclipse results of the British expeditions of 1919 with the deductions from the Einstein law of gravitation gives an increased importance to the observations on the displacements of the absorption lines in the solar spectrum relative to terrestrial sources, as the evidence on this deduction from the Einstein theory is at present contradictory. Particular interest, moreover, attaches to such observations, inasmuch as the mathematical physicists are not in agreement as to the validity of this deduction, and solar observations must eventually furnish the criterion.’ St. John’s statement touches on some of the reasons why the history of the red shift provides such a fascinating case study for those interested in the scientific reception of Einstein’s general theory of relativity. In contrast to the other two ‘classical tests’, the weight of the early observations was not in favor of Einstein’s red shift formula, and the reaction of the scientific community to the threat of disconfirmation reveals much more about the contemporary scientific views of Einstein’s theory. The last sentence of St. John’s statement points to another factor that both complicates and heightens the interest of the situation: in contrast to Einstein’s deductions of the advance of Mercury’s perihelion and of the bending of light, considerable doubt existed as to whether or not the general theory did entail a red shift for the solar spectrum.