DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1306.2974V1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1306.2974V1 Draft version June 14, 2013 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 03/07/07 STELLAR DIAMETERS AND TEMPERATURES III. MAIN SEQUENCE A, F, G, & K STARS: ADDITIONAL HIGH-PRECISION MEASUREMENTS AND EMPIRICAL RELATIONS Tabetha S. Boyajian1,2, Kaspar von Braun3,4, Gerard van Belle5, Chris Farrington6, Gail Schaefer6, Jeremy Jones1, Russel White1, Harold A. McAlister1, Theo A. ten Brummelaar6, Stephen Ridgway7, Douglas Gies1, Laszlo Sturmann6, Judit Sturmann6, Nils H. Turner6, P. J. Goldfinger6, Norm Vargas6 Draft version June 14, 2013 ABSTRACT Based on CHARA Array measurements, we present the angular diameters of 23 nearby, main- sequence stars, ranging from spectral type A7 to K0, five of which are exoplanet host stars. We derive linear radii, effective temperatures, and absolute luminosities of the stars using HIPPARCOS parallaxes and measured bolometric fluxes. The new data are combined with previously published values to create an Angular Diameter Anthology of measured angular diameters to main-sequence stars (luminosity class V and IV). This compilation consists of 125 stars with diameter uncertainties of less than 5%, ranging in spectral types from A to M. The large quantity of empirical data are used to derive color-temperature relations to an assortment of color indices in the Johnson (BV RJIJJHK), Cousins (RCIC), Kron (RKIK), Sloan (griz), and WISE (W3W4) photometric systems. These relations have an average standard deviation of ∼ 3% and are valid for stars with spectral types A0 to M4. To derive even more accurate relations for Sun-like stars, we also determined these temperature relations omitting early-type stars (Teff > 6750 K) that may have biased luminosity estimates because of rapid rotation; for this subset the dispersion is only ∼ 2.5%. We find effective temperatures in agreement within a couple percent for the interferometrically characterized sample of main sequence stars compared to those derived via the infrared-flux method and spectroscopic analysis. Subject headings: Stars: fundamental parameters, Stars: late-type, Stars: low-mass, Infrared: stars, Techniques: interferometric, Techniques: high angular resolution, Stars: atmo- spheres, Stars: general, (Stars:) Hertzsprung-Russell and C-M diagrams, (Stars): planetary systems 1. INTRODUCTION empirically determine the absolute properties of the star, Aside from our Sun, stars are often-times considered namely the linear radius and effective temperature (e.g. unresolved point sources, with no readily measurable 2- Boyajian et al. 2012a). D structure obtainable. However, current technology en- Stellar properties can also be indirectly estimated from ables measurements of angular diameters of stars with comparisons of spectral lines and predictions from at- somewhat large angular sizes (θ > a few × ∼ 0.1 mas, mospheric models. Strengths in such stellar atmosphere where θ is the angular diameter) to be spatially resolved and evolutionary models as well as less-direct methods via long-baseline optical/infrared interferometry (LBOI) of characterizing stellar properties do not just rely upon (refer to references in Table 3 for examples). The two the input physics; very often it is necessary to calibrate general flavors of observable stellar diameters include the zero points from direct measurements. The ability evolved stars (giants/supergiants), whose extended lin- to characterize empirically the fundamental properties of arXiv:1306.2974v1 [astro-ph.SR] 12 Jun 2013 ear diameter compensate for their relatively large dis- stars through interferometry provides us with the criti- tance from the observer, and main-sequence stars, whose cal information needed to constrain and allow improve- linear size remains non-inflated from stellar evolution and ments for stellar atmosphere and evolutionary models therefore must reside in the observer’s close vicinity. It (Andersen 1991; Torres et al. 2010). is these nearby stars with known parallaxes and inter- General characterization of stars using spectroscopic ferometrically measured angular sizes that enable us to analysis in combination with evolutionary models (e.g., Valenti & Fischer 2005; Takeda 2007) are dependent on 1 Center for High Angular Resolution Astronomy and Depart- the accuracies of models and uniqueness of solutions ob- ment of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University, P. O. tainable. Such model atmosphere codes used to analyze Box 4106, Atlanta, GA 30302-4106 the stellar spectrum are dependent on many variables 2 Department of Astronomy, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511 such as metallicity, temperature, gravity, and microtur- 3 NASA Exoplanet Science Institute, California Institute of bulent velocity, and existing degeneracies between pa- Technology, MC 100-22, Pasadena, CA 91125 rameters make for difficult analysis given such a large and 4 Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69117 Hei- correlated parameter space. Spectroscopic solutions for delberg 5 Lowell Observatory, Flagstaff, AZ 86001 effective temperature, surface gravity, and atmospheric 6 The CHARA Array, Mount Wilson Observatory, Mount Wil- abundances are the leading constraints to subsequent son, CA 91023 analysis using evolutionary models, where the stellar 7 National Optical Astronomy Observatory, P.O. Box 26732, mass and radius may be determined. Tucson, AZ 85726-6732 2 Boyajian & von Braun et al. The work in Boyajian et al. (2012a) compares interfer- A census of angular diameter measurements of lower- ometrically determined properties to those using model- mass K- and M-dwarfs recently enumerated in DT2 yield dependent methods. They find that the use of spectro- a total of 33 stars. In this work, we expand on the DT2 scopically or photometrically defined properties tend to sample to describe fully the current state of measured overestimate the effective temperatures compared to di- angular diameters including all A-, F-, and G-type main- rectly measured values. This discrepancy in tempera- sequence stars. We follow the same method and criteria ture is strongly correlated to an offset in spectroscopi- as in DT2, admitting only stars where the angular diam- cally measured surface gravities - consequently yielding eter was measured to better than 5%. higher masses and younger ages for the stars studied (see In addition to the collection of literature measure- their figures 22 and 23). Offsets in spectroscopic sur- ments, in this work we present new angular diameters face gravities have also been noted to be present through for 23 stars (Section 2.1). Stars with multiple measure- spectroscopic analysis alone, as discussed in section 7.4 of ments are also examined in Section 2.2, where we deter- Valenti & Fischer (2005). However as they note, the lack mine mean values for use in the determination of their of data available to calibrate these properties limits the fundamental properties (Section 2.3) and the analysis of accuracies of their solutions. Iterative techniques using the data (Section 3). interferometrically constrained parameters in combina- tion with spectroscopic analysis have proven to yield ro- 2.1. Observations with the CHARA Array bust results, such as the one used in Crepp et al. (2012). Akin to the observing outlined in DT1 and DT2, ob- Unfortunately, however, such targets are scarce, given servations for this project were made with the CHARA the observability requirements (brightness and proxim- Array, a long-baseline optical/infrared interferometer lo- ity) of LBOI. cated on Mount Wilson Observatory in southern Cali- Stellar temperatures from the infrared flux fornia (see ten Brummelaar et al. 2005 for details). The method (IRFM), a technique first developed by target stars were selected based on their approximate Blackwell & Shallis (1977), is a popular substitute angular size (a function of their intrinsic linear size and for defining stellar properties, and the least model distance to the observer). We limit the selection to stars dependent behind interferometric measurements. The with angular sizes > 0.45 mas, in order to adequately photometrically based IRFM is advantageous in ap- resolve their sizes to a few percent precision with the se- proach because it may be applied to a large number of lected instrument set-up. Note that all stars that meet stars, spanning a large range in metallicities. Tremen- this requirement are brighter than the instrumental lim- dous work has blossomed in the field over the past few its of our detector by several magnitudes. The stars also decades, however its true validity is somewhat plagued have no known stellar companion within three arcsec- by systematic differences between the temperature onds to avoid contamination of incoherent light in the scales used in the literature, which can be as large as interferometers field of view. From 2008 to 2012, we used ∼ 100 K (see Gonz´alez Hern´andez & Bonifacio 2009; the CHARA Classic beam combiner operating in H-band ′ Casagrande et al. 2010, and references therein). As (λH = 1.67µm) and K -band (λK′ = 2.14µm) to collect many argue, the zero-point calibration of the IRFM observations of 23 stars using CHARA’s longest baseline lacks the empirical data as a good foundation - always combinations. A log of the observations can be found in referring to the paucity of interferometric measurements Table 1. available. As is customary, all science targets were observed in A few years past, we embarked on a interferometric bracketed sequences along with calibrator stars. To survey of main-sequence stars, as previously reported in choose an appropriate
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE EVOLUTION of SOLAR FLUX from 0.1 Nm to 160Μm: QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATES for PLANETARY STUDIES
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by St Andrews Research Repository The Astrophysical Journal, 757:95 (12pp), 2012 September 20 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/95 C 2012. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. THE EVOLUTION OF SOLAR FLUX FROM 0.1 nm TO 160 μm: QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATES FOR PLANETARY STUDIES Mark W. Claire1,2,3, John Sheets2,4, Martin Cohen5, Ignasi Ribas6, Victoria S. Meadows2, and David C. Catling7 1 School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK NR4 7TJ; [email protected] 2 Virtual Planetary Laboratory and Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195, USA 3 Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, P.O. Box 85561, Seattle, WA 98145-1561, USA 4 Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Wyoming, Box 204C, Physical Sciences, Laramie, WY 82070, USA 5 Radio Astronomy Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411, USA 6 Institut de Ciencies` de l’Espai (CSIC-IEEC), Facultat de Ciencies,` Torre C5 parell, 2a pl, Campus UAB, E-08193 Bellaterra, Spain 7 Virtual Planetary Laboratory and Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Box 351310, Seattle, WA 98195, USA Received 2011 December 14; accepted 2012 August 1; published 2012 September 6 ABSTRACT Understanding changes in the solar flux over geologic time is vital for understanding the evolution of planetary atmospheres because it affects atmospheric escape and chemistry, as well as climate. We describe a numerical parameterization for wavelength-dependent changes to the non-attenuated solar flux appropriate for most times and places in the solar system.
    [Show full text]
  • Stellar Magnetic Activity – Star-Planet Interactions
    EPJ Web of Conferences 101, 005 02 (2015) DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/2015101005 02 C Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2015 Stellar magnetic activity – Star-Planet Interactions Poppenhaeger, K.1,2,a 1 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambrigde, MA 02138, USA 2 NASA Sagan Fellow Abstract. Stellar magnetic activity is an important factor in the formation and evolution of exoplanets. Magnetic phenomena like stellar flares, coronal mass ejections, and high- energy emission affect the exoplanetary atmosphere and its mass loss over time. One major question is whether the magnetic evolution of exoplanet host stars is the same as for stars without planets; tidal and magnetic interactions of a star and its close-in planets may play a role in this. Stellar magnetic activity also shapes our ability to detect exoplanets with different methods in the first place, and therefore we need to understand it properly to derive an accurate estimate of the existing exoplanet population. I will review recent theoretical and observational results, as well as outline some avenues for future progress. 1 Introduction Stellar magnetic activity is an ubiquitous phenomenon in cool stars. These stars operate a magnetic dynamo that is fueled by stellar rotation and produces highly structured magnetic fields; in the case of stars with a radiative core and a convective outer envelope (spectral type mid-F to early-M), this is an αΩ dynamo, while fully convective stars (mid-M and later) operate a different kind of dynamo, possibly a turbulent or α2 dynamo. These magnetic fields manifest themselves observationally in a variety of phenomena.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Article in PDF Format
    A&A 646, A77 (2021) Astronomy https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039765 & c ESO 2021 Astrophysics Stellar chromospheric activity of 1674 FGK stars from the AMBRE-HARPS sample I. A catalogue of homogeneous chromospheric activity? J. Gomes da Silva1, N. C. Santos1,2, V. Adibekyan1,2, S. G. Sousa1, T. L. Campante1,2, P. Figueira3,1, D. Bossini1, E. Delgado-Mena1, M. J. P. F. G. Monteiro1,2, P. de Laverny4, A. Recio-Blanco4, and C. Lovis5 1 Instituto de Astrofísica e Ciências do Espaço, Universidade do Porto, CAUP, Rua das Estrelas, 4150-762 Porto, Portugal e-mail: [email protected] 2 Departamento de Fiísica e Astronomia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal 3 European Southern Observatory, Alonso de Cordova 3107, Vitacura, Santiago, Chile 4 Université Côte d’Azur, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, CNRS, Laboratoire Lagrange, Nice, France 5 Observatoire Astronomique de l’Université de Genève, 51 Ch. des Maillettes, 1290 Versoix, Switzerland Received 26 October 2020 / Accepted 15 December 2020 ABSTRACT Aims. The main objective of this project is to characterise chromospheric activity of FGK stars from the HARPS archive. We start, in this first paper, by presenting a catalogue of homogeneously determined chromospheric emission (CE), stellar atmospheric parameters, and ages for 1674 FGK main sequence (MS), subgiant, and giant stars. The analysis of CE level and variability is also performed. Methods. We measured CE in the Ca ii H&K lines using more than 180 000 high-resolution spectra from the HARPS spectrograph, as compiled in the AMBRE project, obtained between 2003 and 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • ASTR 545 Module 2 HR Diagram 08.1.1 Spectral Classes: (A) Write out the Spectral Classes from Hottest to Coolest Stars. Broadly
    ASTR 545 Module 2 HR Diagram 08.1.1 Spectral Classes: (a) Write out the spectral classes from hottest to coolest stars. Broadly speaking, what are the primary spectral features that define each class? (b) What four macroscopic properties in a stellar atmosphere predominantly govern the relative strengths of features? (c) Briefly provide a qualitative description of the physical interdependence of these quantities (hint, don’t forget about free electrons from ionized atoms). 08.1.3 Luminosity Classes: (a) For an A star, write the spectral+luminosity class for supergiant, bright giant, giant, subgiant, and main sequence star. From the HR diagram, obtain approximate luminosities for each of these A stars. (b) Compute the radius and surface gravity, log g, of each luminosity class assuming M = 3M⊙. (c) Qualitative describe how the Balmer hydrogen lines change in strength and shape with luminosity class in these A stars as a function of surface gravity. 10.1.2 Spectral Classes and Luminosity Classes: (a,b,c,d) (a) What is the single most important physical macroscopic parameter that defines the Spectral Class of a star? Write out the common Spectral Classes of stars in order of increasing value of this parameter. For one of your Spectral Classes, include the subclass (0-9). (b) Broadly speaking, what are the primary spectral features that define each Spectral Class (you are encouraged to make a small table). How/Why (physically) do each of these depend (change with) the primary macroscopic physical parameter? (c) For an A type star, write the Spectral + Luminosity Class notation for supergiant, bright giant, giant, subgiant, main sequence star, and White Dwarf.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Article in PDF Format
    A&A 562, A92 (2014) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321493 & c ESO 2014 Astrophysics Li depletion in solar analogues with exoplanets Extending the sample, E. Delgado Mena1,G.Israelian2,3, J. I. González Hernández2,3,S.G.Sousa1,2,4, A. Mortier1,4,N.C.Santos1,4, V. Zh. Adibekyan1, J. Fernandes5, R. Rebolo2,3,6,S.Udry7, and M. Mayor7 1 Centro de Astrofísica, Universidade do Porto, Rua das Estrelas, 4150-762 Porto, Portugal e-mail: [email protected] 2 Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, C/ Via Lactea s/n, 38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 3 Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna, 38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 4 Departamento de Física e Astronomia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal 5 CGUC, Department of Mathematics and Astronomical Observatory, University of Coimbra, 3049 Coimbra, Portugal 6 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, CSIC, Spain 7 Observatoire de Genève, Université de Genève, 51 ch. des Maillettes, 1290 Sauverny, Switzerland Received 18 March 2013 / Accepted 25 November 2013 ABSTRACT Aims. We want to study the effects of the formation of planets and planetary systems on the atmospheric Li abundance of planet host stars. Methods. In this work we present new determinations of lithium abundances for 326 main sequence stars with and without planets in the Teff range 5600–5900 K. The 277 stars come from the HARPS sample, the remaining targets were observed with a variety of high-resolution spectrographs. Results. We confirm significant differences in the Li distribution of solar twins (Teff = T ± 80 K, log g = log g ± 0.2and[Fe/H] = [Fe/H] ±0.2): the full sample of planet host stars (22) shows Li average values lower than “single” stars with no detected planets (60).
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2105.11583V2 [Astro-Ph.EP] 2 Jul 2021 Keck-HIRES, APF-Levy, and Lick-Hamilton Spectrographs
    Draft version July 6, 2021 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX63 The California Legacy Survey I. A Catalog of 178 Planets from Precision Radial Velocity Monitoring of 719 Nearby Stars over Three Decades Lee J. Rosenthal,1 Benjamin J. Fulton,1, 2 Lea A. Hirsch,3 Howard T. Isaacson,4 Andrew W. Howard,1 Cayla M. Dedrick,5, 6 Ilya A. Sherstyuk,1 Sarah C. Blunt,1, 7 Erik A. Petigura,8 Heather A. Knutson,9 Aida Behmard,9, 7 Ashley Chontos,10, 7 Justin R. Crepp,11 Ian J. M. Crossfield,12 Paul A. Dalba,13, 14 Debra A. Fischer,15 Gregory W. Henry,16 Stephen R. Kane,13 Molly Kosiarek,17, 7 Geoffrey W. Marcy,1, 7 Ryan A. Rubenzahl,1, 7 Lauren M. Weiss,10 and Jason T. Wright18, 19, 20 1Cahill Center for Astronomy & Astrophysics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 2IPAC-NASA Exoplanet Science Institute, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 3Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 4Department of Astronomy, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 5Cahill Center for Astronomy & Astrophysics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 6Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, The Pennsylvania State University, 525 Davey Lab, University Park, PA 16802, USA 7NSF Graduate Research Fellow 8Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA 9Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 10Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawai`i,
    [Show full text]
  • STELLAR SPECTRA A. Basic Line Formation
    STELLAR SPECTRA A. Basic Line Formation R.J. Rutten Sterrekundig Instituut Utrecht February 6, 2007 Copyright c 1999 Robert J. Rutten, Sterrekundig Instuut Utrecht, The Netherlands. Copying permitted exclusively for non-commercial educational purposes. Contents Introduction 1 1 Spectral classification (“Annie Cannon”) 3 1.1 Stellar spectra morphology . 3 1.2 Data acquisition and spectral classification . 3 1.3 Introduction to IDL . 4 1.4 Introduction to LaTeX . 4 2 Saha-Boltzmann calibration of the Harvard sequence (“Cecilia Payne”) 7 2.1 Payne’s line strength diagram . 7 2.2 The Boltzmann and Saha laws . 8 2.3 Schadee’s tables for schadeenium . 12 2.4 Saha-Boltzmann populations of schadeenium . 14 2.5 Payne curves for schadeenium . 17 2.6 Discussion . 19 2.7 Saha-Boltzmann populations of hydrogen . 19 2.8 Solar Ca+ K versus Hα: line strength . 21 2.9 Solar Ca+ K versus Hα: temperature sensitivity . 24 2.10 Hot stars versus cool stars . 24 3 Fraunhofer line strengths and the curve of growth (“Marcel Minnaert”) 27 3.1 The Planck law . 27 3.2 Radiation through an isothermal layer . 29 3.3 Spectral lines from a solar reversing layer . 30 3.4 The equivalent width of spectral lines . 33 3.5 The curve of growth . 35 Epilogue 37 References 38 Text available at \tthttp://www.astro.uu.nl/~rutten/education/rjr-material/ssa (or via “Rob Rutten” in Google). Introduction These three exercises concern the appearance and nature of spectral lines in stellar spectra. Stellar spectrometry laid the foundation of astrophysics in the hands of: – Wollaston (1802): first observation of spectral lines in sunlight; – Fraunhofer (1814–1823): rediscovery of spectral lines in sunlight (“Fraunhofer lines”); their first systematic inventory.
    [Show full text]
  • Spectral Classification and HR Diagram of Pre-Main Sequence Stars in NGC 6530
    A&A 546, A9 (2012) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219853 & c ESO 2012 Astrophysics Spectral classification and HR diagram of pre-main sequence stars in NGC 6530,, L. Prisinzano, G. Micela, S. Sciortino, L. Affer, and F. Damiani INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Palermo, Piazza del Parlamento, Italy 1, 90134 Palermo, Italy e-mail: [email protected] Received 20 June 2012 / Accepted 3 August 2012 ABSTRACT Context. Mechanisms involved in the star formation process and in particular the duration of the different phases of the cloud contrac- tion are not yet fully understood. Photometric data alone suggest that objects coexist in the young cluster NGC 6530 with ages from ∼1 Myr up to 10 Myr. Aims. We want to derive accurate stellar parameters and, in particular, stellar ages to be able to constrain a possible age spread in the star-forming region NGC 6530. Methods. We used low-resolution spectra taken with VLT/VIMOS and literature spectra of standard stars to derive spectral types of a subsample of 94 candidate members of this cluster. Results. We assign spectral types to 86 of the 88 confirmed cluster members and derive individual reddenings. Our data are better fitted by the anomalous reddening law with RV = 5. We confirm the presence of strong differential reddening in this region. We derive fundamental stellar parameters, such as effective temperatures, photospheric colors, luminosities, masses, and ages for 78 members, while for the remaining 8 YSOs we cannot determine the interstellar absorption, since they are likely accretors, and their V − I colors are bluer than their intrinsic colors.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11 SOLAR RADIO EMISSION W
    Chapter 11 SOLAR RADIO EMISSION W. R. Barron E. W. Cliver J. P. Cronin D. A. Guidice Since the first detection of solar radio noise in 1942, If the frequency f is in cycles per second, the wavelength radio observations of the sun have contributed significantly X in meters, the temperature T in degrees Kelvin, the ve- to our evolving understanding of solar structure and pro- locity of light c in meters per second, and Boltzmann's cesses. The now classic texts of Zheleznyakov [1964] and constant k in joules per degree Kelvin, then Bf is in W Kundu [1965] summarized the first two decades of solar m 2Hz 1sr1. Values of temperatures Tb calculated from radio observations. Recent monographs have been presented Equation (1 1. 1)are referred to as equivalent blackbody tem- by Kruger [1979] and Kundu and Gergely [1980]. perature or as brightness temperature defined as the tem- In Chapter I the basic phenomenological aspects of the perature of a blackbody that would produce the observed sun, its active regions, and solar flares are presented. This radiance at the specified frequency. chapter will focus on the three components of solar radio The radiant power received per unit area in a given emission: the basic (or minimum) component, the slowly frequency band is called the power flux density (irradiance varying component from active regions, and the transient per bandwidth) and is strictly defined as the integral of Bf,d component from flare bursts. between the limits f and f + Af, where Qs is the solid angle Different regions of the sun are observed at different subtended by the source.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sun's Dynamic Atmosphere
    Lecture 16 The Sun’s Dynamic Atmosphere Jiong Qiu, MSU Physics Department Guiding Questions 1. What is the temperature and density structure of the Sun’s atmosphere? Does the atmosphere cool off farther away from the Sun’s center? 2. What intrinsic properties of the Sun are reflected in the photospheric observations of limb darkening and granulation? 3. What are major observational signatures in the dynamic chromosphere? 4. What might cause the heating of the upper atmosphere? Can Sound waves heat the upper atmosphere of the Sun? 5. Where does the solar wind come from? 15.1 Introduction The Sun’s atmosphere is composed of three major layers, the photosphere, chromosphere, and corona. The different layers have different temperatures, densities, and distinctive features, and are observed at different wavelengths. Structure of the Sun 15.2 Photosphere The photosphere is the thin (~500 km) bottom layer in the Sun’s atmosphere, where the atmosphere is optically thin, so that photons make their way out and travel unimpeded. Ex.1: the mean free path of photons in the photosphere and the radiative zone. The photosphere is seen in visible light continuum (so- called white light). Observable features on the photosphere include: • Limb darkening: from the disk center to the limb, the brightness fades. • Sun spots: dark areas of magnetic field concentration in low-mid latitudes. • Granulation: convection cells appearing as light patches divided by dark boundaries. Q: does the full moon exhibit limb darkening? Limb Darkening: limb darkening phenomenon indicates that temperature decreases with altitude in the photosphere. Modeling the limb darkening profile tells us the structure of the stellar atmosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • SYNTHETIC SPECTRA for SUPERNOVAE Time a Basis for a Quantitative Interpretation. Eight Typical Spectra, Show
    264 ASTRONOMY: PA YNE-GAPOSCHKIN AND WIIIPPLE PROC. N. A. S. sorption. I am indebted to Dr. Morgan and to Dr. Keenan for discussions of the problems of the calibration of spectroscopic luminosities. While these results are of a preliminary nature, it is apparent that spec- troscopic absolute magnitudes of the supergiants can be accurately cali- brated, even if few stars are available. For a calibration of a group of ten stars within Om5 a mean distance greater than one kiloparsec is necessary; for supergiants this requirement would be fulfilled for stars fainter than the sixth magnitude. The errors of the measured radial velocities need only be less than the velocity dispersion, that is, less than 8 km/sec. 1 Stebbins, Huffer and Whitford, Ap. J., 91, 20 (1940). 2 Greenstein, Ibid., 87, 151 (1938). 1 Stebbins, Huffer and Whitford, Ibid., 90, 459 (1939). 4Pub. Dom., Alp. Obs. Victoria, 5, 289 (1936). 5 Merrill, Sanford and Burwell, Ap. J., 86, 205 (1937). 6 Pub. Washburn Obs., 15, Part 5 (1934). 7Ap. J., 89, 271 (1939). 8 Van Rhijn, Gron. Pub., 47 (1936). 9 Adams, Joy, Humason and Brayton, Ap. J., 81, 187 (1935). 10 Merrill, Ibid., 81, 351 (1935). 11 Stars of High Luminosity, Appendix A (1930). SYNTHETIC SPECTRA FOR SUPERNOVAE By CECILIA PAYNE-GAPOSCHKIN AND FRED L. WHIPPLE HARVARD COLLEGE OBSERVATORY Communicated March 14, 1940 Introduction.-The excellent series of spectra of the supernovae in I. C. 4182 and N. G. C. 1003, published by Minkowski,I present for the first time a basis for a quantitative interpretation. Eight typical spectra, show- ing the major stages of the development during the first two hundred days, are shown in figure 1; they are directly reproduced from Minkowski's microphotometer tracings, with some smoothing for plate grain.
    [Show full text]
  • Stellar Atmospheres I – Overview
    Indo-German Winter School on Astrophysics Stellar atmospheres I { overview Hans-G. Ludwig ZAH { Landessternwarte, Heidelberg ZAH { Landessternwarte 0.1 Overview What is the stellar atmosphere? • observational view Where are stellar atmosphere models needed today? • ::: or why do we do this to us? How do we model stellar atmospheres? • admittedly sketchy presentation • which physical processes? which approximations? • shocking? Next step: using model atmospheres as \background" to calculate the formation of spectral lines •! exercises associated with the lecture ! Linux users? Overview . TOC . FIN 1.1 What is the atmosphere? Light emitting surface layers of a star • directly accessible to (remote) observations • photosphere (dominant radiation source) • chromosphere • corona • wind (mass outflow, e.g. solar wind) Transition zone from stellar interior to interstellar medium • connects the star to the 'outside world' All energy generated in a star has to pass through the atmosphere Atmosphere itself usually does not produce additional energy! What? . TOC . FIN 2.1 The photosphere Most light emitted by photosphere • stellar model atmospheres often focus on this layer • also focus of these lectures ! chemical abundances Thickness ∆h, some numbers: • Sun: ∆h ≈ 1000 km ? Sun appears to have a sharp limb ? curvature effects on the photospheric properties small solar surface almost ’flat’ • white dwarf: ∆h ≤ 100 m • red super giant: ∆h=R ≈ 1 Stellar evolution, often: atmosphere = photosphere = R(T = Teff) What? . TOC . FIN 2.2 Solar photosphere: rather homogeneous but ::: What? . TOC . FIN 2.3 Magnetically active region, optical spectral range, T≈ 6000 K c Royal Swedish Academy of Science (1000 km=tick) What? . TOC . FIN 2.4 Corona, ultraviolet spectral range, T≈ 106 K (Fe IX) c Solar and Heliospheric Observatory, ESA & NASA (EIT 171 A˚ ) What? .
    [Show full text]