Behavior and Ecology of Silky Sharks Around the Chagos Archipelago and Evidence of Indian Ocean Wide Movement
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
fmars-07-596619 December 16, 2020 Time: 13:10 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 16 December 2020 doi: 10.3389/fmars.2020.596619 Behavior and Ecology of Silky Sharks Around the Chagos Archipelago and Evidence of Indian Ocean Wide Movement David J. Curnick1,2*, Samantha Andrzejaczek3, David M. P. Jacoby1, Daniel M. Coffey4, Aaron B. Carlisle5, Taylor K. Chapple3,6, Francesco Ferretti7, Robert J. Schallert3, Timothy White3,8, Barbara A. Block3, Heather J. Koldewey9,10 and Ben Collen2† 1 Institue of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, United Kingdom, 2 Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom, Edited by: 3 Hopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, CA, United States, 4 Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Mourier Johann, Studies, Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, TX, United States, 5 School of Marine Science and Policy, Institut de Recherche Pour le University of Delaware, Lewes, DE, United States, 6 Oregon State University, Hatfield Marine Science Center, Newport, OR, Développement (IRD), France United States, 7 Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States, 8 Global Fishing Reviewed by: Watch, Washington, DC, United States, 9 Zoological Society of London, London, United Kingdom, 10 Centre for Ecology John David Filmalter, and Conservation, University of Exeter, Cornwall, United Kingdom South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, South Africa Paul Brickle, Silky sharks (Carcharhinus falciformis) represent a major component of global shark South Atlantic Environmental catch, both directly and as bycatch, and populations are declining as a result. An Research Institute, Falkland Islands Marc Soria, improved understanding of their movement ecology is needed to support conservation Institut de Recherche Pour le efforts. We deployed satellite and acoustic tags (2013–2018) and analyzed historical Développement (IRD), France fisheries records (1997–2009), to investigate the spatial ecology of silky sharks in the *Correspondence: central Indian Ocean and a large Marine Protected Area (MPA; 640,000 km2) around David J. Curnick [email protected] the Chagos Archipelago. We observed high fidelity to the MPA, and a sustained †Deceased diurnal association with a seamount complex, with individuals moving off at night and returning at sunrise. Yet, we also observed large-scale divergent movements in Specialty section: This article was submitted to two satellite tagged individuals and documented the furthest recorded displacement Marine Megafauna, distance for a satellite tagged silky shark to date, with one individual moving from a section of the journal the MPA to the Kenyan coast—a displacement distance of 3,549 km (track distance Frontiers in Marine Science ∼4,782 km). Silky sharks undertook diel vertical migrations and oscillatory diving Received: 19 August 2020 Accepted: 10 November 2020 behavior, spending > 99% of their time in the top 100 m, and diving to depths of Published: 16 December 2020 greater than 300 m, overlapping directly with typical deployments of purse seine and Citation: longline sets in the Indian Ocean. One individual was recorded to a depth of 1,112 Curnick DJ, Andrzejaczek S, Jacoby DMP, Coffey DM, Carlisle AB, m, the deepest recorded silky shark dive to date. Individuals spent 96% of their time ◦ Chapple TK, Ferretti F, Schallert RJ, at liberty within water temperatures between 24 and 30 C. Historic fisheries data White T, Block BA, Koldewey HJ and revealed that silky sharks were a major component of the shark community around the Collen B (2020) Behavior and Ecology of Silky Sharks Around the Chagos archipelago, representing 13.69% of all sharks caught by longlines before the fishery Archipelago and Evidence of Indian closed in 2010. Over half (55.88%) of all individuals caught by longlines and purse Ocean Wide Movement. Front. Mar. Sci. 7:596619. seiners were juveniles. The large proportion of juveniles, coupled with the high site doi: 10.3389/fmars.2020.596619 fidelity and residence observed in some individuals, suggests that the MPA could provide Frontiers in Marine Science| www.frontiersin.org 1 December 2020| Volume 7| Article 596619 fmars-07-596619 December 16, 2020 Time: 13:10 # 2 Curnick et al. Spatial Ecology of Silky Sharks considerable conservation benefits for silky sharks, particularly during early life-history stages. However, their high mobility potential necessitates that large MPAs need to be considered in conjunction with fisheries regulations and conservation measures in adjacent EEZs and in areas beyond national jurisdiction. Keywords: fisheries, seamount, Carcharhinus falciformis, habitat use, biotelemetry, residency, migration, marine protected area INTRODUCTION in the West Indian Ocean and Pacific Ocean to explore the movement and mortality rates of these sharks in response to Significant historical declines have been observed in pelagic fisheries’ bycatch (Musyl et al., 2003, 2011a; Filmalter et al., 2011; shark populations (Baum et al., 2003; Ferretti et al., 2010; Poisson et al., 2011, 2014; Hutchinson et al., 2015; Musyl and Dulvy et al., 2014). This has largely been driven by high spatial Gilman, 2018), and to quantify associations with fishing gear, overlap with industrial fishing activities (Queiroz et al., 2016, such as fish aggregation devices (FADs) (Filmalter et al., 2010, 2019), where pelagic sharks account for over half of shark catch 2015; Muir et al., 2012). A few tagging studies have also evaluated globally (Worm et al., 2013). Central to developing the effective key behaviors such as residency patterns or habitat utilization, but conservation and management strategies urgently needed for these have been focused in the Pacific Ocean (Musyl et al., 2011b; these species is a firm understanding of their spatial ecology Hutchinson et al., 2019) and the Red Sea (Clarke et al., 2011a), (Boerder et al., 2019). covering just a fraction of their circumtropical range. Pelagic sharks spend considerable periods of time on the Silky sharks are one of the most heavily exploited high seas, in areas beyond national jurisdiction (Queiroz et al., elasmobranch species, targeted by both artisanal and industrial 2019), where there are limited legal frameworks to protect them longline shark fisheries (Hazin et al., 2007; Bonfil, 2008; (Wright et al., 2019). However, electronic tagging indicates some Henderson et al., 2009). Their tendency to associate with schools pelagic shark species exploit their environment in predictable of tuna also results in them representing a major component of ways (Block et al., 2011; Lea et al., 2015; Doherty et al., 2017) or bycatch in tropical longline and purse seine fisheries (Román- show residency to certain sites or features (e.g., Jorgensen et al., Verdesoto and Orozco-Zöller, 2005; Bonfil, 2008; Watson 2010; Queiroz et al., 2016; Carlisle et al., 2019; Aldana-Moreno et al., 2009; Clarke et al., 2011b; Gilman, 2011). Furthermore, et al., 2020) providing target areas for effective management. their propensity to associate with floating objects, especially as Yet, existing studies into pelagic shark spatial ecology are juveniles (Romanov, 2002; Amandè et al., 2008), makes them taxonomically and geographically biased. In a recent analysis of particularly vulnerable to FAD fishing (Filmalter et al., 2011), pelagic shark tagging data, nearly 77% of pelagic sharks tagged where they can comprise up to 95% of the total elasmobranch were from just six species (blue shark Prionace glauca, shortfin bycatch (Román-Verdesoto and Orozco-Zöller, 2005; Gilman, mako Isurus oxyrinchus, tiger shark Galeocerdo cuvier, salmon 2011; Lawson, 2011), with a high proportion being juveniles shark Lamna ditropis, whale shark Rhincodon typus, and white (Amandè et al., 2008, 2010). Mortality rates of sharks caught shark Carcharodon carcharias) and highlighted that the Indian by purse seiners is also high, with less than 20% of released Ocean was generally data-poor compared to the Pacific and individuals thought to survive (Poisson et al., 2014; Hutchinson Atlantic Oceans (Queiroz et al., 2019). As such, there is a pressing et al., 2015). As a result, the silky shark population in the need to broaden our understanding of pelagic shark ecology to Atlantic Ocean is declining (Rigby et al., 2017) and stocks in the understudied species and underrepresented regions. Western and Central Pacific (WCPFC, 2018) and Indian Ocean Silky sharks (Carcharhinus falciformis) are important, yet are “subject to overfishing” (Urbina et al., 2018). A number of relatively understudied, pelagic predators that inhabit continental conservation and management actions have been initiated to 1 shelves, slopes, and offshore waters from the surface down to address perceived declines, such as the listing of silky sharks on 500 m (Compagno, 1984; Bonfil, 2008). Adult silky sharks are of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species 1 primarily piscivorous (Compagno, 1984), with juveniles also of Wild Animals (CMS) and see footnote of the Convention feeding on pelagic crustaceans (Filmalter et al., 2017), and they on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna & form large feeding aggregations when food is plentiful (Bonfil, Flora (CITES), or the prohibition of all vessels from retaining or 2008). In the Gulf of Mexico, neonates and young juveniles have landing any silky shark in the Western and Central Pacific Region