DOCSLIB.ORG

Usability Engineering: Industry- Government Collaboration for System Effectiveness and Efficiency SYMPOSIUM TRANSCRIPTION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Usability Engineering: Industry- Government Collaboration for System Effectiveness and Efficiency SYMPOSIUM TRANSCRIPTION NIST Aiiios Dflfiibfi pecial Publication 500-237 PUBLICATIONS I' ^— Information Technology: Usability Engineering: Industry- Government Collaboration for System Effectiveness and Efficiency SYMPOSIUM TRANSCRIPTION Laura L. Downey and Sharon J. Laskowski, Editors U.S. Department of Commerce Technology Administration QQ National Institute of Standards and Technology 100 U57 Nisr NO. 500-237 1997 I rhe National Institute of Standards and Technology was established in 1988 by Congress to "assist industry in the development of technology . needed to improve product quality, to modernize manufacturing processes, to ensure product reliability . and to facilitate rapid commercialization ... of products based on new scientific discoveries." NIST, originally founded as the National Bureau of Standards in 1901, works to strengthen U.S. industry's competitiveness; advance science and engineering; and improve public health, safety, and the environment. One of the agency's basic functions is to develop, maintain, and retain custody of the national standards of measurement, and provide the means and methods for comparing standards used in science, engineering, manufacturing, commerce, industry, and education with the standards adopted or recognized by the Federal Government. As an agency of the U.S. Commerce Department's Technology Administration, NIST conducts basic and applied research in the physical sciences and engineering, and develops measurement techniques, test methods, standards, and related services. The Institute does generic and precompetitive work on new and advanced technologies. NIST's research facilities are located at Gaithersburg, MD 20899, and at Boulder, CO 80303. Major technical operating units and their principal activities are listed below. For more information contact the Publications and Program Inquiries Desk, 301-975-3058. Office of the Director Physics Laboratory • National Quality Program • Electron and Optical Physics • International and Academic Affairs • Atomic Physics • Optical Technology Technology Services • Ionizing Radiation • Standards Services • Time and Frequency' • Technology Partnerships • Quantum Physics' • Measurement Services • Technology Innovation Materials Science and Engineering • Information Services Laboratory • Intelligent Processing of Materials Advanced Technology Program • Ceramics • Economic Assessment • Materials Reliability' • Information Technology and Applications • Polymers • Chemical and Biomedical Technology • Metallurgy • Materials and Manufacturing Technology • NIST Center for Neutron Research • Electronics and Photonics Technology Manufacturing Engineering Manufacturing Extension Partnership Laboratory Program • Precision Engineering • Regional Programs • Automated Production Technology • National Programs • Intelligent Systems • Program Development • Fabrication Technology • Manufacturing Systems Integration Electronics and Electrical Engineering Laboratory Building and Fire Research • Microelectronics Laboratory • Law Enforcement Standards • Structures • Electricity • Building Materials • Semiconductor Electronics • Building Environment • Electromagnetic Fields' • Fire Safety Engineering • Electromagnetic Technology' • Fire Science • Optoelectronics' Information Technology Laboratory Chemical Science and Technology • Mathematical and Computational Sciences^ Laboratory • Advanced Network Technologies • Biotechnology • Computer Security • Physical and Chemical Properties^ • Information Access and User Interfaces • Analytical Chemistry • High Performance Systems and Services • Process Measurements • Distributed Computing and Information Services • Surface and Microanalysis Science • Software Diagnostics and Conformance Testing ' At Boulder, CO 80303. ^Some elements at Boulder, CO. NIST Special Publication 500-237 Information Technology: SYMPOSIUM TRANSCRIPTION Usability Engineering: Industry- Government Collaboration for System Effectiveness and Efficiency held February 26, 1996, at the National Institute of Standards and Technology Laura L. Downey and Sharon J. Laskowski, Editors Information Access and User Interfaces Division Information Technology Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899-0001 July 1997 U.S. Department of Commerce William M. Daley, Secretary Technology Administration Gary R. Bachula, Acting Under Secretary for Technology National Institute of Standards and Technology Robert E. Hebner, Acting Director Reports on Information Technology The Information Technology Laboratory (ITL) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) stimulates U.S. economic growth and industrial competitiveness through technical leadership and collaborative research in critical infrastructure technology, including tests, test methods, reference data, and forward-looking standards, to advance the development and productive use of information technology. To overcome barriers to usability, scalability, interoperability, and security in information systems and networks, ITL programs focus on a broad range of networking, security, and advanced information technologies, as well as the mathematical, statistical and computational sciences. This Special Publication 500 series reports on ITL's research in tests and test methods for information technology, and its collaborative activities with industry, government, and academic organizations. National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 500-237 Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 500-237 261 pages (July 1997) CODEN: NSPUE2 U.S. Government Printing Office Washington: 1997 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325 FOREWORD On February 26, 1996, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) sponsored the symposium "Usability Engineering: Industry-Government Collaboration for System Effectiveness and Efficiency." The symposium brought together over 100 industry and government professionals to exchange information and strategies for achieving effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction in computer-based government systems. It also provided a forum for raising awareness about usability engineering and its role in increasing productivity and decreasing costs. The symposium was the first of its kind to address the need to incorporate usability engineering practices into the design and development of computer-based government systems. With the mandate and fiscal necessity of employing commercial, off-the-shelf (COTS) products with legacy data, the complexity of government systems is only increased. It is critical that government and industry implement the best practices now available to ensure usability. This is especially applicable to goverment systems because of the large number (and high cost) of custom computer systems and legacy system integration and updates. This document provides a complete record of the workshop presentations in a conversational style based on the transcription of the symposium videotapes. Figures from the original proceedings were included and referenced to enhance the transcription of each speaker's presentation. For a brief overview of the symposium, including background information, attendee demographics, and feedback, see the symposium report in the SIGCHI Bulletin, October 1996, Volume 28, Number 4. Much positive feedback was received and a second symposium is planned for March 3, 1997. As a note of information, this version (August 1997) of the transcription supersedes the preliminary version dated February 27, 1997. Also, any mention of specific products in either version of the symposium transcription is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any recommendation and/or endorsement by NIST. Editors: Laura L. Downey, NIST (Symposixun Chair) Dr. Sharon J. Laskowski, NIST (Program Committee) (Any errors in the symposium record are a result ofthe transcription and editing done at NIST.) TABLE OF CONTENTS Presentation Page Foreword-- ~ iii Author Index vii Executive Overview of Usability Engineering 1 Rex Hartson, Virginia Tech Keynote - Usability Trends in Government 23 Bill Hefley, Software Engineering Institute Cost-Benefit Analysis of Usability Engineering 41 Clare-Marie Karat, IBM Making Sense ofHCI/GUI Standards and Guidelines ~ 61 Elizabeth Buie, Computer Sciences Corporation Success Stories: A Usability Success Story at the Social Security Administration (SSA) 77 Pat Stoos, OSDD at SSA Focusing on Usability at the Federal Intelligent Document Understanding Laboratory: A Success Story 89 Therasa O'Connell, PRC TIGERS — A Successful Usability Engineering Methodology 99 Daniel Wallace, Naval Surface Warfare Center Usability Engineering in Europe 125 Nigel Bevan, NPL Using Usability Testing to Manage Risk 133 Carolyn Snyder, User Interface Engineering Conduct Usability Testing! A Major Findingfrom a Study of Commercial Best Practices 149 Pascal Gambardella, Computer Sciences Corporation V TABLE OF CONTENTS (CON'T) Presentation Page Usability Issues in Complex Government Systems 169 Donna Cuomo and Jill Drury, MITRE Advanced Interface Design and Evaluation for Navy Applications 191 Astrid Schmidt-Nielsen, Naval Research Laboratory The Role of Users in the Development of Computer Systemsfor the National Airspace System 205 Allyn C. Dillman, Professional Airways System Specialists Needs Assessment/Open Forum 211 Laura Downey and Sharon Laskowski, NIST Closing Plenary - Making Usability Work in the Organization 219 George Casaday, DEC An European Perspective
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Human-Centred Design for Interactive Systems (ISO 9241-210:2010)
    Irish Standard I.S. EN ISO 9241-210:2010 Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (ISO 9241-210:2010) © NSAI 2010 No copying without NSAI permission except as permitted by copyright law. This is a free 13 page sample. Access the full version online. I.S. EN ISO 9241-210:2010 The National Standards Authority of Ireland (NSAI) produces the following categories of formal documents: I.S. xxx: Irish Standard – national specification based on the consensus of an expert panel and subject to public consultation. S.R. xxx: Standard Recommendation - recommendation based on the consensus of an expert panel and subject to public consultation. SWiFT xxx: A rapidly developed recommendatory document based on the consensus of the participants of an NSAI workshop. EN ISO 13407:1999 EN ISO 9241-210:2010 20 October, 2010 EN ISO 13407:1999 1 June, 1999 ICS number: This document was published 13.180 under the authority of the NSAI 35.180 This is a free 13 page sample. Access the full version online. and comes into effect on: 8 November, 2010 1 Swift Square, T +353 1 807 3800 T +353 1 857 6730 Northwood, Santry F +353 1 807 3838 F +353 1 857 6729 Dublin 9 E [email protected] W standards.ie W Údarás um Chaighdeáin Náisiúnta na hÉireann I.S. EN ISO 9241-210:2010 EUROPEAN STANDARD EN ISO 9241-210 NORME EUROPÉENNE EUROPÄISCHE NORM October 2010 ICS 13.180; 35.180 Supersedes EN ISO 13407:1999 English Version Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 210: Human- centred design for interactive systems (ISO 9241-210:2010) Ergonomie de l'interaction homme-système - Partie 210: Ergonomie der Mensch-System-Interaktion - Teil 210: Conception centrée sur l'opérateur humain pour les Prozess zur Gestaltung gebrauchstauglicher interaktiver systèmes interactifs (ISO 9241-210:2010) Systeme (ISO 9241-210:2010) This European Standard was approved by CEN on 30 September 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Performance Regression Testing
    Human Performance Regression Testing Amanda Swearngin, Myra B. Cohen Bonnie E. John, Rachel K. E. Bellamy Dept. of Computer Science & Eng. IBM T. J. Watson Research Center University of Nebraska-Lincoln, USA P.O. Box 704 Lincoln, NE 68588-0115 Yorktown Heights, NY 10598, USA faswearn,[email protected] fbejohn,[email protected] Abstract—As software systems evolve, new interface features common tasks, necessitating longer mouse movements and, in such as keyboard shortcuts and toolbars are introduced. While fact, decrease efficiency. In addition, many toolbars with small it is common to regression test the new features for functional icons may add screen clutter and may decrease a new user’s correctness, there has been less focus on systematic regression testing for usability, due to the effort and time involved in human ability to discover how to accomplish a task over a simpler studies. Cognitive modeling tools such as CogTool provide some UI design. help by computing predictions of user performance, but they still Usability testing has traditionally been empirical, bringing require manual effort to describe the user interface and tasks, end-users in to a testing facility, asking them to perform tasks limiting regression testing efforts. In recent work, we developed on the system (or prototype), and measuring such things as the CogTool-Helper to reduce the effort required to generate human performance models of existing systems. We build on this work time taken to perform the task, the percentage of end-users by providing task specific test case generation and present our who can complete the task in a fixed amount of time, and vision for human performance regression testing (HPRT) that the number and type of errors made by the end-users.
    [Show full text]
  • The Usability of a Visual, Flow-Based Programming Environment for Non-Programmers
    THE USABILITY OF A VISUAL, FLOW-BASED PROGRAMMING ENVIRONMENT FOR NON-PROGRAMMERS by Alia H. Shubair A thesis presented to Ryerson University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Program of Computer Science Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2014 © Alia H. Shubair 2014 ii Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I authorize Ryerson University to lend this thesis to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I further authorize Ryerson University to reproduce this thesis by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public for the purpose of scholarly research only. iii iv Abstract The Usability of A Visual, Flow-Based Programming Environment for Non-Programmers Alia H. Shubair Master of Science, Computer Science Ryerson University, 2014 Living with “Big Data” gives us the advantage of being able to exploit this wealth of data sources and derive useful insights to make better decisions, enhance productivity, and optimize resources. However, this advantage is limited to a small group of profes- sionals, with the rest of the population unable to access this data. Lack of support for non-professionals creates the need for data manipulation tools to support all sectors of society without acquiring complex technical skills.
    [Show full text]
  • Iso 9241-210:2010(E)
    This preview is downloaded from www.sis.se. Buy the entire standard via https://www.sis.se/std-912053 INTERNATIONAL ISO STANDARD 9241-210 First edition 2010-03-15 Ergonomics of human–system interaction — Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems Ergonomie de l'interaction homme–système — Partie 210: Conception centrée sur l'opérateur humain pour les systèmes interactifs Reference number ISO 9241-210:2010(E) © ISO 2010 This preview is downloaded from www.sis.se. Buy the entire standard via https://www.sis.se/std-912053 ISO 9241-210:2010(E) PDF disclaimer This PDF file may contain embedded typefaces. In accordance with Adobe's licensing policy, this file may be printed or viewed but shall not be edited unless the typefaces which are embedded are licensed to and installed on the computer performing the editing. In downloading this file, parties accept therein the responsibility of not infringing Adobe's licensing policy. The ISO Central Secretariat accepts no liability in this area. Adobe is a trademark of Adobe Systems Incorporated. Details of the software products used to create this PDF file can be found in the General Info relative to the file; the PDF-creation parameters were optimized for printing. Every care has been taken to ensure that the file is suitable for use by ISO member bodies. In the unlikely event that a problem relating to it is found, please inform the Central Secretariat at the address given below. COPYRIGHT PROTECTED DOCUMENT © ISO 2010 All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from either ISO at the address below or ISO's member body in the country of the requester.
    [Show full text]
  • Software Quality Management
    Software Quality Management 2004-2005 Marco Scotto ([email protected]) Software Quality Management Contents ¾Definitions ¾Quality of the software product ¾Special features of software ¾ Early software quality models •Boehm model • McCall model ¾ Standard ISO 9126 Software Quality Management 2 Definitions ¾ Software: intellectual product consisting of information stored on a storage device (ISO/DIS 9000: 2000) • Software may occur as concepts, transactions, procedures. One example of software is a computer program • Software is "intellectual creation comprising the programs, procedures, rules and any associated documentation pertaining to the operation of a data processing system" •A software product is the "complete set of computer programs, procedures and associated documentation and data designated for delivery to a user" [ISO 9000-3] • Software is independent of the medium on which it is recorded Software Quality Management 3 Quality of the software product ¾The product should, on the highest level… • Ensure the satisfaction of the user needs • Ensure its proper use ¾ Earlier: 1 developer, 1 user • The program should run and produce results similar to those expected ¾ Later: more developers, more users • Need to economical use of the storage devices • Understandability, portability • User-friendliness, learnability ¾ Nowadays: • Efficiency, reliability, no errors, able to restart without using data Software Quality Management 4 Special features of software (1/6) ¾ Why is software ”different”? • Does not really have “physical” existence
    [Show full text]
  • Cognitive and Usability Engineering Methods for the Evaluation of Clinical Information Systems
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Journal of Biomedical Informatics 37 (2004) 56–76 www.elsevier.com/locate/yjbin Methodological Review Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems Andre W. Kushniruka,* and Vimla L. Patelb a Information Technology Division, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, York University, Toronto, Canada b Laboratory of Decision Making and Cognition, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY Received 29 September 2003 Abstract Increasingly healthcare policy and decision makers are demanding evidence to justify investments in health information systems. This demand requires an adequate evaluation of these systems. A wide variety of approaches and methodologies have been applied in assessing the impact of information systems in health care, ranging from controlled clinical trials to use of questionnaires and interviews with users. In this paper we describe methodological approaches which we have applied and refined for the past 10 years for the evaluation of health information systems. The approaches are strongly rooted in theories and methods from cognitive science and the emerging field of usability engineering. The focus is on assessing human computer interaction and in particular, the usability of computer systems in both laboratory and naturalistic settings. The methods described can be a part of the formative evaluation of systems during their iterative development, and can also complement more traditional assessment methods used in summative system evaluation of completed systems. The paper provides a review of the general area of systems evaluation with the motivation and rationale for methodological approaches underlying usability engineering and cognitive task analysis as applied to health in- formation systems.
    [Show full text]
  • ISO 9241: Uma Proposta De Utilização Da Norma Para Avaliação Do Grau De Satisfação De Usuários De Software
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repositório Institucional da UFSC Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Produção ISO 9241: Uma Proposta de Utilização da Norma para Avaliação do Grau de Satisfação de Usuários de Software Dissertação submetida à Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina como requisito parcial para obtenção do grau de Mestre em Engenharia de Produção por Marco Aurélio Medeiros Florianópolis, 30 de julho de 1999 ISO 9241: Uma Proposta de Utilização da Norma para Avaliação do Grau de Satisfação de Usuários de Software Marco Aurélio Medeiros Esta dissertação foi julgada adequada para a obtenção do título de Mestre em Engenharia, especialidade Engenharia de Produção, área de concentração Ergonomia , e aprovada em sua forma final pelo curso de Pós-Graduação da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Prof. Walter de Abreu Cybis, Dr. Orientador Prof. Ricardo Miranda Barcia, Dr. Ph.D. Coordenador do Curso de Pós-Graduação Banca Examinadora Prof. Neri dos Santos, Dr. Prof. Vitorio Bruno Mazzola, Dr. Prof. Walter de Abreu Cybis, Dr. ii Dedico este trabalho à minha esposa Márcia e a meus filhos, Artur e Luiza, motivos da minha existência e da minha felicidade. iii AGRADECIMENTOS Minha sincera gratidão: à minha família e à de minha esposa, pelo exemplo e apoio; à Diretoria da Softplan, Ílson, Guto e Marafon, e colaboradores, especialmente Fábio Miranda, estagiário no DERPR; Aos Departamentos de Estradas de Rodagem da Bahia, Distrito Federal, Paraná e Santa Catarina; ao Prof. Dr. Jochen Prümper, BAO – Alemanha, pela colaboração fundamental para a realização deste trabalho; ao meu Orientador, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Quality-Based Software Reuse
    Quality-Based Software Reuse Julio Cesar Sampaio do Prado Leite1, Yijun Yu2, Lin Liu3, Eric S. K. Yu2, John Mylopoulos2 1Departmento de Informatica, Pontif´ıcia Universidade Catolica´ do Rio de Janeiro, RJ 22453-900, Brasil 2Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, M5S 3E4 Canada 3School of Software, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China Abstract. Work in software reuse focuses on reusing artifacts. In this context, finding a reusable artifact is driven by a desired functionality. This paper proposes a change to this common view. We argue that it is possible and necessary to also look at reuse from a non-functional (quality) perspective. Combining ideas from reuse, from goal-oriented requirements, from aspect-oriented programming and quality management, we obtain a goal-driven process to enable the quality-based reusability. 1 Introduction Software reuse has been a lofty goal for Software Engineering (SE) research and prac- tice, as a means to reduced development costs1 and improved quality. The past decade has seen considerable progress in fulfilling this goal, both with respect to research ideas and industrial practices (e.g., [1–3]). Current reuse techniques focus on the reuse of software artifacts on the basis of de- sired functionality. However, non-functional properties (qualities) of a software system are also crucial. Systems fail because of inadequate performance, security, reliability, usability, or precision, to name a few. Quality concerns, therefore, should also be front and centre in methods for software reuse. For example, in designing for the NASA Mars Spirit spacecraft, one would not adopt a “cosine” function from an arbitrary mathemat- ical library.
    [Show full text]
  • Isys Information Architects Inc
    Isys Information Architects Inc. Home Design Announcements Hall of Shame Isys Information Architects Inc. specializes in the design and development of New Entries robust, highly usable information systems. Isys focuses on ease of use, recognizing Controls that software should assist the user in the performance of some task rather than Stupidity becoming a task in itself. Isys was founded by Brian Hayes, a former professor of Visual Color Industrial Engineering, and system design consultant whose clients have included Terminology AT&T, General Electric, General Motors, Lucent Technologies, NASA, Siemens, Errors the U.S. Air Force, and the U.S. Army. Tabs Metaphors We are a full-service Our software development Globalization provider of user interface department specializes in the In-Depth design and usability design and development of engineering services. Our careful robust, highly usable information Books systems for the Windows operating Links attention to the user interface can system. We provide custom Index reduce system development time, Feedback increase user satisfaction, and reduce programming, database, and training costs. application development services. Hall of Fame Contact Us The Interface Hall of Shame The Interface Hall of is an irreverent look at Fame is a collection of ineffective interface design. images that demonstrate The site includes a collection of interface design solutions that are images from commercial, corporate, both creative and effective. and shareware applications that illustrate how software should not be designed. Isys Information Architects Inc. 5401 McNairy Drive, Suite 100 Greensboro, NC 27455 [email protected] © 1996-1999 Isys Information Architects Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.
    [Show full text]
  • Usability of Geographic Information; Current Challenges and Future Directions Brown M.1,2, Sharples S.2, Harding J.3, Parker C
    Usability of Geographic Information Page 1 Usability of Geographic Information; Current Challenges and Future Directions Brown M.1,2, Sharples S.2, Harding J.3, Parker C. J.4, Bearman N.5, Maguire M.4, Forrest D.6, Haklay M.7 and Jackson M.8. 1 Horizon Digital Economy Research, University of Nottingham, Innovation Park, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK 2Human Factors Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK 3Ordnance Survey, Adanac Drive, Southampton, SO16 0AS, UK 4 Loughborough Design School, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK 5 School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK 6 School of Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK 7Department of Civil, Environment and Geomatic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK 8Centre for Geospatial Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, University Park Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK ABSTRACT: The use of Geographic Information or GI, has grown rapidly in recent years. Previous research has identified the importance of usability and user centred design in enabling the proliferation and exploitation of GI. However, the design and development of usable GI is not simply a matter of applying the tried and tested usability methods that have been developed for software and web design. Dealing with data and specifically GI brings with it a number of issues that change the way usability and user centred design can be applied. This paper describes the outcomes of a workshop held in March 2010 exploring the core issues relating to GI usability.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Rules
    Design rules Chapter 7 adapted by Dr. Kristina Lapin, Vilnius University design rules Designing for maximum usability – the goal of interaction design • Principles of usability – general understanding • Standards and guidelines – direction for design • Design patterns – capture and reuse design knowledge types of design rules • principles – abstract design rules – low authority – high generality Guideline s • standards – specific design rules – high authority – limited application increasinggenerality Standards • guidelines generality increasing – lower authority increasing authority increasing authority – more general application Principles to support usability Learnability the ease with which new users can begin effective interaction and achieve maximal performance Flexibility the multiplicity of ways the user and system exchange information Robustness the level of support provided the user in determining successful achievement and assessment of goal- directed behaviour •Predictability •Synthezability Learnability •Familiarity •Generalizability •Consistency Principles of learnability Predictability – determining effect of future actions based on past interaction history – operation visibility Predictability http://www.webbyawards.com/ 7 Principles of learnability Synthesizability – assessing the effect of past actions – immediate vs. eventual honesty Synthesizability 1. 2. 3. 9 Principles of learnability (ctd) Familiarity – how prior knowledge applies to new system – guessability; affordance Principles of learnability (ctd) Generalizability
    [Show full text]
  • Usability Basics for Software Developers Usability Engineering
    focususability engineering Usability Basics for Software Developers Xavier Ferré and Natalia Juristo, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Helmut Windl, Siemens AG, Germany Larry Constantine, Constantine & Lockwood n recent years, software system usability has made some interesting ad- vances, with more and more organizations starting to take usability seri- ously.1 Unfortunately, the average developer has not adopted these new I concepts, so the usability level of software products has not improved. Contrary to what some might think, us- Usability engineering defines the target us- This tutorial ability is not just the appearance of the user ability level in advance and ensures that the examines the interface (UI). Usability relates to how the software developed reaches that level. The system interacts with the user, and it includes term was coined to reflect the engineering ap- relationship five basic attributes: learnability, efficiency, proach some usability specialists take.3 It is between usability user retention over time, error rate, and sat- “a process through which usability character- and the user isfaction. Here, we present the general us- istics are specified, quantitatively and early in interface and ability process for building a system with the the development process, and measured desired level of usability. This process, which throughout the process.”4 Usability is an is- discusses how most usability practitioners apply with slight sue we can approach from multiple view- the usability variation, is structured around a design- points, which is why many different disci- process follows a evaluate-redesign cycle. Practitioners initiate plines, such as psychology, computer science, design-evaluate- the process by analyzing the targeted users and sociology, are trying to tackle it.
    [Show full text]