Anti-Cancer Drugs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Introduction Malignant disease accounts for a high proportion of deaths in industrialised countries. The treatment of anticancer drug is to give palliation, induce remission and if possible, cure. Introduction Cancer occurs after normal cells have been transformed into neoplastic cells through alteration of their genetic material and the abnormal expression of certain genes. Neoplastic cells usually exhibit chromosomal abnormalities and the loss of their differentiated properties. These changes lead to uncontrolled cell division and many result in the invasion of previously unaffected organs a process called metastasis. Treatment options of cancer: Surgery: before 1955 Radiotherapy: 1955~1965 Chemotherapy: after 1965 Immunotherapy and Gene therapy According to chemical structure and resource of the drug; According to biochemistry mechanisms of anticancer action; According to the cycle or phase specificity of the drug According to chemical structure and resource of the drug: Alkylating Agents, Antimetabolite, Antibiotics, Plant Extracts,Hormones, ImmunotherapyRadiotherapeutic Agents, Cytoprotective Agents, Antineoplastic Platinum Compounds According to biochemistry mechanisms of anticancer action: Block nucleic acid biosynthesis Direct influence the structure and function of DNA Interfere transcription and block RNA synthesis Interfere protein synthesis and function Influence hormone homeostasis According to the cycle or phase specificity of the drug: Cell cycle nonspecific agents (CCNSA) Cell cycle specific agents (CCSA) The cycle of cell replication includes: G1(Gap1, period S(DNA synthesis) before S)phase phase G2(Gap2,period M(Mitosis)phase after S)phase The Basic Concept of Cell Generation Cycle The G1 phase is the period when newly created cell is born. The period of time the cell remains in the G1 phase depends upon the type of cell (tumor cell or normal cell).Cells can be born in proliferated or non-proliferated state. If the cell is a proliferating cell,it will move quickly to S or synthesis phase. In this period, DNA replicates and two copies of DNA are present in the cell. The next phase is G2 phase and cells are prepared for final cell cycle M phase or Mitosis. There are two major control points in cell cycle, G1/S phase, the cell replicates and G2 / M phase, the cell divides. G1 / S phase is important in understanding cancer and cancer treatment. Tumor cells can be classified as proliferating cells and non-proliferating cells. The ratio of proliferating cells in the whole tumor tissue is called growth fraction (GF). Proliferating cell group GF= Total tumor cell group The faster the tumor cells proliferate, the bigger the GF is and the higher the sensitivity of tumor to a drug is. Generally, in the early stage, the GF of a tumor is bigger and the effect of a drug on the tumor is better CCNSA:drugs that are active throughout the cell cycle. CCSA: drugs that act during a specific phase of the cell cycle. Cell Cycle Nonspecific Agents (CCNSA) drugs that are active throughout the cell cycle Alkylating Agents Platinum Compounds Antibiotics Cell Cycle Specific Agents (CCSA) drugs that act during a specific phase of the cell cycle S Phase Specific Drug: Antimetabolites, Topoisomerase Inhibitors M Phase Specific Drug: Vinca Alkaloids, Taxanes G2 Phase Specific Drug: Bleomycin One of the frightening developments of World War I was the introduction of chemical warfare. These compounds were known as the nitrogen mustard gases. The nitrogen mustards were observed to inhibit cell growth, especially of bone marrow. Shortly after the war, these compounds were investigated and shown to inhibit the growth of cancer cells. Alkylating Agents Alkylating agents were one of the earliest classes of drugs used to treat cancer, beginning in the 1940’s. The biggest weakness of most cancer cells is that they are very sensitive to DNA damage. Alkylating agents work by reacting with the proteins that bond together to form the very delicate double helix structure of a DNA molecule, adding an alkyl group to some or all of them. This prevents the proteins from linking up as they should, causing breakage of the DNA strands and eventually, the death of the cancer cell. Alkylating Agents This phenomenon is essentially a mutation that takes away the cancer cell’s ability to multiply. While there are many different classes of alkylating agents, they all work by this same chemical mechanism. Alkylating agents are highly electrophilic compounds which react with nucleophiles to form a strong covalent bond. It acts by transfer of alkyl group to biologically important constituents such as amino, sulfhydryl or phosphate group whose function is then impaired. Alkylating Agents Alkylating agents are known to react with DNA, RNA and protein They act by alkylating N - 7 position of guanine in DNA, which results in the formation of apurinic site. The alkylating agent appears to be most effective in G1 or S phase. nu – H + alkyl - Y alkyl – nu + H+ +Y+ Nucleophile of Alkylating biopolymer agent Alkylating Agents The five major categories of alkylating agents are Nitrogen mustard Alkyl sulfonates Ethylenimines Methylmelamine Methyl hydrazines Nitrosourea Imidazo tetrazines Resistance to alkylating agents has several causes: Membrane transport may be decreased. The drug may be bound by glutathione (GSH) via GSH-S-transferase or metallothioneins in the cytoplasm and inactivated. The drug may be metabolized to inactive species. Myelosuppression is the dose-limiting adverse effect for alkylating agents. Nausea and vomiting are common as are teratogenesis and gonadal atrophy, although in the latter cases these are variable, according to the drug, its schedule, and route of administration. Treatment also carries a major risk of leukemogenesis and carcinogenesis. O O (ClCH2 CH2)2N P H2O HN 2-[Bis (2-chloroethyl) amino] tetrahydro - 2H -1,3,2- oxazo - phosphorin -2- oxide monohydrate Use: It is used against multiple myeloma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia and acute leukemia of children Block nucleic acid (DNA, RNA) biosynthesis Directly destroy DNA and inhibit DNA reproduction Interfere transcription and block RNA synthesis Interfere protein synthesis and function Influence hormone homeostasis Antimetabolites: • Folic Acid Antagonist: inhibit dihydrofolate reductase (methotrexate) • Pyrimidine Antagonist: inhibit thymidylate synthetase (fluorouracil) ; inhibit DNA polymerase (cytarabine) • Purine Antagonist: inhibit interconversion of purine nucleotide (mercaptopurine) • Ribonucleoside Diphosphate Reductase Antagonist: (hydroxyurea) A. Fluorouracil (5FU – CBC, Flocil) O F HN O N H 5-Fluoro - 2, 4- (1H, 3H) pyrimidindione. O O CF 3OF HN Fluoroxy tri F fluoro methane HN O Fluorination N O H N H Uracil Fluorouracil Use: It is effective in palliative management of carcinoma of the breast, colon, pancreas, rectum and stomach in patient who cannot be cured by surgery. It is also used in the treatment of skin and basal cell carcinomas. S H N N N H2N N H 2-Amino-7H-purin-6-thiol It is a guanine analogue, belongs to the family of drugs called antimatabolites. Its act by integrated into DNA and RNA, which result in the inhibition of synthesis and metabolism of purine nucleotides. Antitubulin: Mitotic spindles serve as molecular railroads with "North and South Poles" in the cell when a cell starts to divide itself into two new cells. These spindles are very important because they help to split the newly copied DNA such that a copy goes to each of the two new cells during cell division. These drugs disrupt the formation of these spindles and therefore interrupt cell division vinca alkaloids and taxanes; Interfere the function of ribosome: harringtonines; Influence amino acid supply: L-asparaginase Bind tubulin, destroy spindle to produce mitotic arrest. In the 1950's a biochemical difference in metabolism related to the amino acid asparagine was found. Normal cells apparently can synthesize asparagine while leukemia cells cannot. If leukemia cells are deprived of asparagine, they will eventually die If the enzyme L-asparaginase is given to humans, various types of leukemias can be controlled. Tumor cells, more specifically lymphatic tumor cells, require huge amounts of asparagines to keep up with their rapid, malignant growth. L-asparaginase is an enzyme that destroys asparagine external to the cell. Normal cells are able to make all the asparagine they need internally whereas tumor cells become depleted rapidly and die. Bind with DNA to block RNA production. doxorubicin Alkylating Agent: mechlorethamine, cyclophosphamide and thiotepa Platinum: cis-platinium Antibiotic: bleomycin and mitomycin C Topoismerase inhibitor: camptothecine and podophyllotoxin These drugs bind to hormone receptors to block the actions of the sex hormones which results in inhibition of tumor growth. Estrogens and estrogen antagonistic drug Androgens and androgen antagonistic drug Progestogen drug Glucocorticoid drug gonadotropin-releasing hormone inhibitor: leuprolide, goserelin aromatase inhibitor: aminoglutethimide, anastrazole General Characteristics: ¾ Antimetabolites are S phase-specific drugs that are structural analogues of essential metabolites and that interfere with DNA synthesis. ¾ Myelosuppression is the dose-limiting toxicity for all drugs in this class. Folic acid Antagonists:MTX Purine Antagonists:6MP 6TG Pyrimidine Antagonists:5FU araC HU Methotrexate (MTX) Mechanism of Action: ¾ The structures of MTX and folic acid are similar. MTX is actively
Recommended publications
  • WHO Drug Information Vol

    WHO Drug Information Vol

    WHO Drug Information Vol. 31, No. 3, 2017 WHO Drug Information Contents Medicines regulation 420 Post-market monitoring EMA platform gains trade mark; Automated 387 Regulatory systems in India FDA field alert reports 421 GMP compliance Indian manufacturers to submit self- WHO prequalification certification 421 Collaboration 402 Prequalification process quality China Food and Drug Administration improvement initiatives: 2010–2016 joins ICH; U.S.-EU cooperation in inspections; IGDRP, IPRF initiatives to join 422 Medicines labels Safety news Improved labelling in Australia 423 Under discussion 409 Safety warnings 425 Approved Brimonidine gel ; Lactose-containing L-glutamine ; Betrixaban ; C1 esterase injectable methylprednisolone inhibitor (human) ; Meropenem and ; Amoxicillin; Azithromycin ; Fluconazole, vaborbactam ; Delafloxacin ; Glecaprevir fosfluconazole ; DAAs and warfarin and pibrentasvir ; Sofosbuvir, velpatasvir ; Bendamustine ; Nivolumab ; Nivolumab, and voxilaprevir ; Cladribine ; Daunorubicin pembrolizumab ; Atezolizumab ; Ibrutinib and cytarabine ; Gemtuzumab ozogamicin ; Daclizumab ; Loxoprofen topical ; Enasidenib ; Neratinib ; Tivozanib ; preparations ; Denosumab ; Gabapentin Guselkumab ; Benznidazole ; Ciclosporin ; Hydroxocobalamine antidote kit paediatric eye drops ; Lutetium oxodotreotide 414 Diagnostics Gene cell therapy Hightop HIV home testing kits Tisagenlecleucel 414 Known risks Biosimilars Warfarin ; Local corticosteroids Bevacizumab; Adalimumab ; Hydroquinone skin lighteners Early access 415 Review outcomes Idebenone
  • Weak Interaction of the Antimetabolite Drug Methotrexate with a Cavitand Derivative

    Weak Interaction of the Antimetabolite Drug Methotrexate with a Cavitand Derivative

    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Weak Interaction of the Antimetabolite Drug Methotrexate with a Cavitand Derivative Zsolt Preisz 1,2, Zoltán Nagymihály 3,4, Beáta Lemli 1,4 ,László Kollár 3,4 and Sándor Kunsági-Máté 1,2,4,* 1 Institute of Organic and Medicinal Chemistry, Medical School, University of Pécs, Szigeti 12, H-7624 Pécs, Hungary; [email protected] (Z.P.); [email protected] (B.L.) 2 Department of General and Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Pécs, Ifjúság 6, H 7624 Pécs, Hungary 3 Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Pécs, Ifjúság 6, H 7624 Pécs, Hungary; [email protected] (Z.N.); [email protected] (L.K.) 4 János Szentágothai Research Center, University of Pécs, Ifjúság 20, H-7624 Pécs, Hungary * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +36-72-503600 (ext. 35449) Received: 2 June 2020; Accepted: 16 June 2020; Published: 18 June 2020 Abstract: Formation of inclusion complexes involving a cavitand derivative (as host) and an antimetabolite drug, methotrexate (as guest) was investigated by photoluminescence measurements in dimethyl sulfoxide solvent. Molecular modeling performed in gas phase reflects that, due to the structural reasons, the cavitand can include the methotrexate in two forms: either by its opened structure with free androsta-4-en-3-one-17α-ethinyl arms or by the closed form when all the androsta-4-en-3-one-17α-ethinyl arms play role in the complex formation. Experiments reflect enthalpy driven complex formation in higher temperature range while at lower temperature the complexes are stabilized by the entropy gain.
  • Public Assessment Report

    Public Assessment Report

    Public Assessment Report Tifix 150mg and 500mg film-coated tablets Capecitabine BE/H/195/01-02/DC BE licence no: BE423552-BE423561 Applicant: Alfred E. Tiefenbacher, Germany Date: 27-04-2012 Toepassingsdatum : 15-09-10 Page 1 of 17 Blz. 1 van 17 This assessment report is published by the Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products following Article 21 (3) and (4) of Directive 2001/83/EC, amended by Directive 2004/27/EC and Article 25 paragraph 4 of Directive 2001/82/EC as amended by 2004/28/EC. The report comments on the registration dossier that was submitted to the Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products and its fellow organisations in all concerned EU member states. It reflects the scientific conclusion reached by the Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products and all concerned member states at the end of the evaluation process and provides a summary of the grounds for approval of a marketing authorisation. This report is intended for all those involved with the safe and proper use of the medicinal product, i.e. healthcare professionals, patients and their family and carers. Some knowledge of medicines and diseases is expected of the latter category as the language in this report may be difficult for laymen to understand. This assessment report shall be updated by a following addendum whenever new information becomes available. To the best of the Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products’ knowledge, this report does not contain any information that should not have been made available to the public. The Marketing Autorisation Holder has checked this report for the absence of any confidential information.
  • Hepatic Arterial Infusion for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases Combined Or Not with Systemic Chemotherapy

    Hepatic Arterial Infusion for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases Combined Or Not with Systemic Chemotherapy

    ANTICANCER RESEARCH 29: 4139-4144 (2009) Hepatic Arterial Infusion for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases Combined or Not with Systemic Chemotherapy PIERLUIGI PILATI, ENZO MAMMANO, SIMONE MOCELLIN, EMANUELA TESSARI, MARIO LISE and DONATO NITTI Clinica Chirurgica II, Department of Oncological and Surgical Sciences, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy Abstract. Background: The hypothesis was tested that CRC have liver metastases at autopsy, and the majority of systemic chemotherapy might contribute to improving overall these patients die as a result of their metastatic disease. survival (OS) of patients with unresectable colorectal liver Surgical resection represents the standard treatment of metastases treated with hepatic arterial infusion (HAI). resectable disease and is followed by 5-year overall Patients and Methods: We considered 153 consecutive patients survival (OS) rates of 20% to 40% (2, 3). Unfortunately, retrospectively divided into group A (n=72) treated with HAI only 20% of patients with liver metastases from CRC alone (floxuridine [FUDR] + leucovorin [LV]), and group B present with liver-confined resectable disease and/or are (n=81) treated with HAI combined with systemic candidates for major surgical operation (depending on chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil [5FU] + LV). Results: No comorbidities) (4, 5). significant difference in OS was observed between the two The therapeutic management of unresectable metastases is groups. Median OS was better in patients with <50% of liver more controversial and is generally associated with a dismal involvement (21.3 vs. 13.2 months; p<0.0001) and in prognosis. In fact, despite the improvements achieved with responders vs. non-responders (24.4 vs. 13.4 months; modern systemic chemotherapy (SCT) regimens (e.g.
  • Drugs and Life-Threatening Ventricular Arrhythmia Risk: Results from the DARE Study Cohort

    Drugs and Life-Threatening Ventricular Arrhythmia Risk: Results from the DARE Study Cohort

    Open Access Research BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016627 on 16 October 2017. Downloaded from Drugs and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia risk: results from the DARE study cohort Abigail L Coughtrie,1,2 Elijah R Behr,3,4 Deborah Layton,1,2 Vanessa Marshall,1 A John Camm,3,4,5 Saad A W Shakir1,2 To cite: Coughtrie AL, Behr ER, ABSTRACT Strengths and limitations of this study Layton D, et al. Drugs and Objectives To establish a unique sample of proarrhythmia life-threatening ventricular cases, determine the characteristics of cases and estimate ► The Drug-induced Arrhythmia Risk Evaluation study arrhythmia risk: results from the the contribution of individual drugs to the incidence of DARE study cohort. BMJ Open has allowed the development of a cohort of cases of proarrhythmia within these cases. 2017;7:e016627. doi:10.1136/ proarrhythmia. Setting Suspected proarrhythmia cases were referred bmjopen-2017-016627 ► These cases have provided crucial safety by cardiologists across England between 2003 and 2011. information, as well as underlying clinical and ► Prepublication history for Information on demography, symptoms, prior medical and genetic data. this paper is available online. drug histories and data from hospital notes were collected. ► Only patients who did not die as a result of the To view these files please visit Participants Two expert cardiologists reviewed data the journal online (http:// dx. doi. proarrhythmia could be included. for 293 referred cases: 130 were included. Inclusion org/ 10. 1136/ bmjopen- 2017- ► Referral of cases by cardiologists alone may have criteria were new onset or exacerbation of pre-existing 016627).
  • Palladium-Mediated Dealkylation of N-Propargyl-Floxuridine As a Bioorthogonal Oxygen-Independent Prodrug Strategy

    Palladium-Mediated Dealkylation of N-Propargyl-Floxuridine As a Bioorthogonal Oxygen-Independent Prodrug Strategy

    OPEN Palladium-Mediated Dealkylation of SUBJECT AREAS: N-Propargyl-Floxuridine as a CHEMOTHERAPY CHEMICAL TOOLS Bioorthogonal Oxygen-Independent DRUG DISCOVERY AND DEVELOPMENT Prodrug Strategy Jason T. Weiss, Neil O. Carragher & Asier Unciti-Broceta Received 2 December 2014 Edinburgh Cancer Research UK Centre, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road Accepted South, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK. 26 February 2015 Published 19 March 2015 Herein we report the development and biological screening of a bioorthogonal palladium-labile prodrug of the nucleoside analogue floxuridine, a potent antineoplastic drug used in the clinic to treat advanced cancers. N-propargylation of the N3 position of its uracil ring resulted in a vast reduction of its biological activity (,6,250-fold). Cytotoxic properties were bioorthogonally rescued in cancer cell culture by Correspondence and heterogeneous palladium chemistry both in normoxia and hypoxia. Within the same environment, the requests for materials reported chemo-reversible prodrug exhibited up to 1,450-fold difference of cytotoxicity whether it was in the absence or presence of the extracellular palladium source, underlining the precise modulation of bioactivity should be addressed to enabled by this bioorthogonally-activated prodrug strategy. A.U.-B. (Asier.Unciti- [email protected]. uk) ioorthogonally-activated prodrug therapies are a heterogeneous group of experimentally and clinically- used therapeutic strategies that are founded on a common principle: the site-specific activation of phar- B maceutical substances by the mediation of non-biological, non-perturbing physical or chemical stimuli. While the nature and properties of the triggering stimulus can be manifestly diverse and seemingly unrelated (e.g.
  • The Universe of Normal and Cancer Cell Line Responses to Anticancer Treatment: Lessons for Cancer Therapy

    The Universe of Normal and Cancer Cell Line Responses to Anticancer Treatment: Lessons for Cancer Therapy

    The universe of normal and cancer cell line responses to anticancer treatment: Lessons for cancer therapy Alexei Vazquez Department of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Institute of New Jersey and UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School. 120 Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA Abstract According to the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results report, 1,479,350 men and women will be diagnosed with and 562,340 will die of cancer of all sites in 2009, indicating that about 40% of the cancer patients do not respond well to current anticancer therapies. Using tumor and normal tissue cell lines as a model, we show this high mortality rate is rooted in inherent features of anticancer treatments. We obtain that, while in average anticancer treatments exhibit a two fold higher efficacy when applied to cancer cells, the response distribution of cancer and normal cells significantly overlap. Focusing on specific treatments, we provide evidence indicating that the therapeutic index is proportional to the fraction of cancer cell lines manifesting significantly good responses, and propose the latter as a quantity to identify compounds with best potential for anticancer therapy. We conclude that there is no single treatment targeting all cancer cell lines at a non-toxic dose. However, there are effective treatments for specific cancer cell lines, which, when used in a personalized manner or applied in combination, can target all cancer cell lines. Background a collaboration between The Cancer Genome Project at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute Cell culture studies are the starting point of most (UK) and the Center for Molecular Therapeutics screens for anticancer treatments [1, 2].
  • August 2019: Methotrexate Mistakes

    August 2019: Methotrexate Mistakes

    August, 2019 www.nursingcenter.com Methotrexate Mistakes Methotrexate is an antimetabolite that interferes with DNA synthesis, repair, and cellular replication. Initially developed as a cancer treatment, methotrexate dosing is based on body surface area and is administered in cycles, rarely daily. The indications for methotrexate expanded to include treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis which requires a low dose typically once or twice a week. Because only a few medications are dosed weekly, overdoses have been common, resulting in vomiting, mouth sores, stomatitis, skin lesions, liver failure, renal failure, myelosuppression, gastrointestinal bleeding, pulmonary symptoms, and death. Methotrexate errors have occurred in the following scenarios: • Medication reconciliation and transitions-of-care: missteps happen when patients are admitted to the hospital and upon discharge to home or other healthcare facilities. o Orders may be entered incorrectly into the electronic medical record (EMR). o Errors occur with medication transcription. o Failure to verify the correct indication (cancer versus non-oncologic). o Medications are not reconciled prior to discharge. • Confusing instructions misunderstood by the patient: Methotrexate dosing is complex, often involving titration or escalating weekly doses. This can be very confusing for patients. o For example, an 8-week supply of 2.5 mg tablets (30 tablets) were dispensed with a prescription that read “Take 3 tablets by mouth 1 day for 2 weeks then increase to 4 tablets by mouth 1 day per week thereafter”. The patient erroneously took 3 tablets (7.5 mg) daily for 5 days which caused serious illness. • Look-alike and sound-alike drug names: Methotrexate has been mistaken for metolazone, a diuretic prescribed daily to treat congestive heart failure or kidney disease.
  • Gemcitabine Class: Antineoplastic Agent, Antimetabolite (Pyrimidine

    Gemcitabine Class: Antineoplastic Agent, Antimetabolite (Pyrimidine

    Gemcitabine Class: Antineoplastic Agent, Antimetabolite (Pyrimidine Analog) Indications: Breast cancer Non small cell lung cancer Ovarian cancer Pancreatic cancer Unlabeled use: Bladder cancer Cervical cancer Head and neck cancer Hepatobiliary cancer Hodgkin lymphoma Malignant pleural mesothelioma Non-Hodgkin lymphoma Sarcoma Small cell lung cancer Testicular cancer Unknown-primary, adenocarcinoma Uterine cancer Available dosage form in the hospital: 200 mg VIAL 1gVIAL Trade Names: Gemzar Doses: Details concerning dosing in combination regimens should also be consulted.Note: Prolongation of the infusion duration >60 minutes and administration more frequently than once weekly have been shown to increase toxicity. -Breast cancer, metastatic: I.V.: 1250 mg/m2 over 30 minutes days 1 and 8; repeat cycle every 21 days (in combination with paclitaxel) or (unlabeled dosing; as a single agent) 800 mg/m2 over 30 minutes days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day treatment cycle (Carmichael, 1995) -Non small cell lung cancer, locally advanced or metastatic: I.V.: 1000 mg/m2 over 30 minutes days 1, 8, and 15; repeat cycle every 28 days (in combination with cisplatin) or 1250 mg/m2 over 30 minutes days 1 and 8; repeat cycle every 21 days (in combination with cisplatin) or (unlabeled dosing/combination) 1000 mg/m2 over 30 minutes days 1 and 8; repeat cycle every 21 days (in combination with carboplatin) for up to 4 cycles. -Ovarian cancer, advanced: I.V.: 1000 mg/m2 over 30 minutes days 1 and 8; repeat cycle every 21 days (in combination with carboplatin) or (unlabeled
  • Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitors and Clinical Outcomes in Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients

    Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitors and Clinical Outcomes in Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients

    Article Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitors and Clinical Outcomes in Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients | Sunil V. Badve,*†‡ Elaine M. Pascoe,* Michael Burke,§ Philip A. Clayton, ¶ Scott B. Campbell,§ Carmel M. Hawley,*§ | Wai H. Lim,** Stephen P. McDonald, ¶ Germaine Wong,†† and David W. Johnson*§ Abstract Background and objectives Emerging evidence from recently published observational studies and an individual – *Australasian Kidney patient data meta analysis shows that mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor use in kidney transplantation Trials Network, School is associated with increased mortality. Therefore, all-cause mortality and allograft loss were compared of Medicine, between use and nonuse of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in patients from Australia and New University of Zealand, where mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor use has been greater because of heightened skin Queensland, cancer risk. Brisbane, Australia; †Department of Nephrology, Design, setting, participants, & measurements Our longitudinal cohort study included 9353 adult patients who St. George Hospital, underwent 9558 kidney transplants between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 2012 and had allograft survival Sydney, Australia; ‡ $1 year. Risk factors for all-cause death and all–cause and death–censored allograft loss were analyzed by Renal and Metabolic Division, The George multivariable Cox regression using mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor as a time-varying covariate. fi Institute for Global Additional analyses evaluated mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor use at xed time points of baseline and Health, Sydney, 1year. Australia; §Department of Results Patients using mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors were more likely to be white and have a history Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, of pretransplant cancer. Over a median follow-up of 7 years, 1416 (15%) patients died, and 2268 (24%) allografts Brisbane, Australia; | were lost.
  • Cancer Treatment Drugs

    Cancer Treatment Drugs

    University of Massachusetts Medical School eScholarship@UMMS Cancer Concepts: A Guidebook for the Non- Oncologist Radiation Oncology 2016-02-22 Cancer Treatment Drugs Richard J. Horner University of Massachusetts Medical School Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Follow this and additional works at: https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cancer_concepts Part of the Cancer Biology Commons, Neoplasms Commons, Oncology Commons, and the Therapeutics Commons Repository Citation Horner RJ. (2016). Cancer Treatment Drugs. Cancer Concepts: A Guidebook for the Non-Oncologist. https://doi.org/10.7191/cancer_concepts.1004. Retrieved from https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/ cancer_concepts/5 Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License. This material is brought to you by eScholarship@UMMS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cancer Concepts: A Guidebook for the Non-Oncologist by an authorized administrator of eScholarship@UMMS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cancer Treatment Drugs Citation: Horner R. Cancer Treatment Drugs. In: Pieters RS, Liebmann J, eds. Cancer Concepts: A Richard J. Horner, MD Guidebook for the Non-Oncologist. Worcester, MA: University of Massachusetts Medical School; nd 2016. 2 ed. doi: 10.7191/cancer_concepts.1004. This project has been funded in whole or in part with federal funds from the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, under Contract No. HHSN276201100010C with the University of Massachusetts, Worcester. Copyright: All content in Cancer Concepts: A Guidebook for the Non-Oncologist, unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike License, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Summary and Key Points 4.
  • Dual Kinase Targeting in Leukemia

    Dual Kinase Targeting in Leukemia

    cancers Review Dual Kinase Targeting in Leukemia Luca Mologni 1, Giovanni Marzaro 2 , Sara Redaelli 1 and Alfonso Zambon 3,* 1 Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy; [email protected] (L.M.); [email protected] (S.R.) 2 Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padova, Via Marzolo 5, I-35131 Padova, Italy; [email protected] 3 Department of Chemistry and Geological Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-059-2058-640 Simple Summary: A new option to treat cancer is based on the use of so-called multi-targeting drugs. This strategy can replace the standard treatment based on the co-administration of several drugs. An increased and uncontrolled activity of kinases (enzymes devoted to the regulation of several cell pathways) is often seen in hematological malignancies. The development of multi-kinase inhibitors is having a great impact on the treatment of this kind of cancer. Here, we review the most recent findings on this novel class of drugs. Abstract: Pharmacological cancer therapy is often based on the concurrent inhibition of different survival pathways to improve treatment outcomes and to reduce the risk of relapses. While this strategy is traditionally pursued only through the co-administration of several drugs, the recent development of multi-targeting drugs (i.e., compounds intrinsically able to simultaneously target several macromolecules involved in cancer onset) has had a dramatic impact on cancer treatment. This review focuses on the most recent developments in dual-kinase inhibitors used in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), and lymphoid tumors, giving details on preclinical studies as well as ongoing clinical trials.