DOCSLIB.ORG

COU Inventory of Physical Facilities of Ontario Universities 2013-141

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
COU Inventory of Physical Facilities of Ontario Universities 2013-141 Inventory of Physical Facilities of Ontario Universities 2013-14 MAY 2015 Inventory of Physical Facilities of Ontario Universities 2013-14 Prepared May 2015 by: Council of Ontario Universities Conseil des universités de l’Ontario 180 Dundas Street West, Suite 1100 Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 www.cou.on.ca For more information contact: Arlene Levine Senior Policy Analyst 416.979.2165 ext. 201 [email protected] ISBN #0-88799-515-2 COU No. 905 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 SECTION 1: OVERVIEW OF THE 2013-14 INVENTORY OF PHYSICAL FACILITIES OF ONTARIO UNIVERSITIES REPORT Changes Made to the 2013-14 Inventory Report ................................................................................... 4 Space Inventory .................................................................................................................................. 6 Research Space .................................................................................................................................. 7 Accessibility ........................................................................................................................................ 8 Age of Building Space.......................................................................................................................... 8 Facilities Condition Assessment Program ............................................................................................. 9 SECTION 2: HISTORICAL TRENDS Space Inventory ................................................................................................................................ 11 Table A Total Actual Space Inventory by COU Space Categories, 2001-02 to 2013-14 ..................... 14 Table B Percentage Distribution of Total Actual Space Inventory by All COU Space Categories, 2001-02 to 2013-14 ....................................................................................... 15 Table C Percentage Distribution of Total Actual Space Inventory by Only the COU Formula Space Categories, 2001-02 to 2013-14 ................................................................ 16 Table D Percentage Distribution of Generated Space (NASM) by COU Formula Space Classification, 2001-02 to 2013-14.......................................................................... 17 Table E ACTUAL Inventory / GENERATED Space (NASM) by COU Formula Space Classification, 2001-02 to 2013-14 ................................................................................... 18 Table F Historical Summary of Statistics, 2001-02 to 2013-14 ........................................................ 19 Graduate Enrolment Expansion .......................................................................................................... 20 Age of Building Space........................................................................................................................ 20 SECTION 3: INSTITUTIONAL TABLES (2013-14 survey) Table 1 Inventory of University Space, November 1, 2013 ........................................................... 23 Table 2 Distribution of Actual Inventory by Major Space Category and Institution ......................... 24 Table 2A Percent Distribution of Actual Inventory by Major Formula Space Category and Institution .............................................................................................................. 26 Table 2B Percent Distribution of Actual Inventory by Major Space Category and Institution .............................................................................................................. 27 Table 3 Age Profile of Ontario University Space (as of November 1, 2013) .................................... 28 Table 3A Percentage Distribution Age Profile of Ontario University Space (as of November 1, 2013) .............................................................................................. 29 Institutional Space Requirements as Measured by COU Space Standards Table 4 System Summary .......................................................................................................... 30 Table 5 Algoma University College .............................................................................................. 31 Table 6 Brock University ............................................................................................................ 32 Table 7 Carleton University ........................................................................................................ 33 I Table 8 University of Guelph ...................................................................................................... 34 Table 9 Lakehead University ...................................................................................................... 35 Table 10 Laurentian University ..................................................................................................... 36 Table 11 Universitaire de Hearst................................................................................................... 37 Table 12 McMaster University....................................................................................................... 38 Table 13 Nipissing University ....................................................................................................... 39 Table 14 Northern Ontario School of Medicine ............................................................................... 40 Table 15 OCAD University ............................................................................................................ 41 Table 16 University of Ontario Institute of Technology ................................................................... 42 Table 17 University of Ottawa ...................................................................................................... 43 Table 18 Queen’s University ......................................................................................................... 44 Table 19 Ryerson University......................................................................................................... 45 Table 20 University of Toronto (St. George campus) ..................................................................... 46 Table 21 University of Toronto (Mississauga campus) .................................................................... 47 Table 22 University of Toronto (Scarborough campus) .................................................................. 48 Table 23 Trent University ............................................................................................................ 49 Table 24 University of Waterloo ................................................................................................... 50 Table 25 Western University ........................................................................................................ 51 Table 26 Wilfrid Laurier University ................................................................................................ 52 Table 27 University of Windsor .................................................................................................... 53 Table 28 York University (Keele campus) ..................................................................................... 54 Table 29 York University (Glendon campus) .................................................................................. 55 SECTION 4: SUMMARY TABLES Table 30 Teaching/Research/Academic Support Space (1,2,3,4,5,10): Generated Space and Inventory ..................................................................................... 57 Table 31 Student Experience / Other Space (6,7,8,9,11,12,13,14,15): Generated Space and Inventory ..................................................................................... 58 Table 32 Classroom Facilities (1): Generated Space and Inventory ................................................. 59 Table 33 Class Lab Space (2): Generated Space and Inventory ...................................................... 60 Table 34 Lab - Research Facilities (3): Generated Space and Inventory .......................................... 61 Table 35 Academic Departmental Office Space and Related Space (4): Generated Space and Inventory ..................................................................................... 62 Table 35A Graduate Student Office Space (4.3): Generated Space and Inventory ............................. 63 Table 36 Administrative Office Space (10): Generated Space and Inventory................................... 64 Table 37 Library Facilities & Campus Study Space (5): Generated Space and Inventory ................... 65 Table 37A Campus Study Space: Generated Space and Inventory .................................................... 66 Table 37B Campus Study Space: Within the Library and Outside the Library ..................................... 67 Table 38 Recreation / Athletics Space (6): Generated Space and Inventory .................................... 68 Table 39 Maintenance Space (9): Generated Space and Inventory ................................................. 69 Table 40 Student and Central Services Space (7-8, 1-15): Generated Space and Inventory .............. 70 Table 41 Total Space (1-15): Generated Space and Inventory ........................................................ 71 II SECTION 5: APPENDICES Appendix A Space Classification Scheme, Formula and Measures ......................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Education Exchange Newsletter (May 2020)
    A newsletter from the Faculty of Education, Lakehead University | May 2020 EDUCATION EXCHANGE NEWSLETTER Barbara van Hatten (left) and Carol Rasmussen worked together as PPOD leaders during the 2019-2020 academic year. Message from Developing Effective the Dean Teaching Practice: are and resilience. Two words that mean C so much at this time. In the confusion “PPOD” Students and challenges that have accompanied the Covid-19 pandemic, we are all facing our own unique set of circumstances. From health and family concerns, to Gain Professional employment and financial insecurity, to the completion of the semester under trying conditions, these are unprecedented Experience in Schools times. Our response to the times must, however, be based on he Professional Program On-Site Delivery (PPOD) schedule looking after each other and ensuring that we work together offers teacher candidates in the Primary/Junior program to overcome the issues that we face. T in Thunder Bay a unique way to learn: they become part of a For our students, we are still here to help answer supportive “pod” community, complete some of their Education questions and address your concerns. If there are any issues courses at a local school, and get a chance to work with students with courses, please contact your instructors. Student Health and Wellness is still operating, so make use of their services in the school to develop their practice. and supports as necessary. The Student Relief Fund is also “The PPOD stream allows teacher candidates to gain available to provide emergency financial assistance. real-world experience in education,” explains Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Handbook 2020-2021
    Handbook Research Handbook 2020-2021 NOSM Research and Graduate Studies Office September 4, 2020 Contents Research at NOSM ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 3 NOSM Research Office Structure and Personnel ..................................................................................... 3 Positions in the Research Office ............................................................................................................... 3 Associate Dean, Research, Innovation and International Relations (RIIR) ............................................... 3 Assistant Dean, Research ......................................................................................................................... 3 Director, Research and Health Sciences Library ....................................................................................... 4 Research Office Coordinators ................................................................................................................... 4 Research Laboratory Coordinators ........................................................................................................... 4 Administrative Assistant ........................................................................................................................... 5 NOSM Research
    [Show full text]
  • Chief Information Officer
    OPPORTUNITY PROFILE Chief Information Officer THE ORGANIZATION: LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY Lakehead is a comprehensive University with a reputation for innovative programs and cutting-edge research. At both campuses, Thunder Bay and Orillia, the faculty, staff, programs, and services team up to provide an extensive range of learning choices and alternatives that offers an unbeatable combination of quality education at the undergraduate and graduate levels. The University promises the total university experience, a blend of academic excellence and opportunity with a rich variety of social and recreational activities. They also promise excellence in research: Lakehead is the proud host to 9 Canada Research Chairs and revolutionary facilities such as their world-renowned Paleo-DNA Laboratory and their Bio-refining Research Institute. Lakehead University is dynamic, modern, and highly learner-centered; they acknowledge all of their students as valued leaders of tomorrow, whose education and success are most paramount to the institution. Vision: To provide a transformative university experience that is far from ordinary. Mission: To be recognized as an innovative comprehensive university that provides an education that is about how to think, not what to think. Beliefs: The University believes their students make Lakehead University different. They believe their students want an innovative comprehensive university where they have the highest chance of success. They believe that their students have the passion and drive to realize their dreams and succeed. They believe that their students want the intellectual freedom to pursue the unconventional. Lakehead University believes in the diversity that comes from their students of many cultures and many nations. They believe their students are passionate about both their own individuality and their communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Fluency Expression of Interest
    January 6, 2021 Digital Fluency Expression of Interest Please review the attached document and submit your application electronically according to the guidelines provided by 11:59 pm EST on February 3, 2021. Applications will not be accepted unless: • Submitted electronically according to the instructions. Submission by any other form such as email, facsimiles or paper copy mail will not be accepted. • Received by the date and time specified. Key Dates: Date Description January 6, 2021 Expression of Interest Released Closing Date and Time for Submissions February 3, 2021 Submissions received after the closing date and 11:59pm EST time will not be considered for evaluation Submit applications here By February 28, 2021 Successful applicants notified Please note: due to the volume of submissions received, unsuccessful applicants will not be notified. Feedback will not be provided eCampusOntario will not be held responsible for documents that are not submitted in accordance with the above instructions NOTE: Awards for this EOI are contingent upon funding from MCU. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................... 3 2. DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................................... 4 WHAT IS DIGITAL FLUENCY? .......................................................................................................... 4 3. PROJECT TYPE .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016-17 Table of Contents Message from the Board Co-Chairs
    Annual Report 2016-17 Table of Contents Message from the Board Co-Chairs........................... 01 Mobility Infrastructure.................................................... 21 Message from the Executive Director........................ 04 Pathway Development Why Mobility Matters..................................................... 07 Knowledge Gathering Who We Are Learning Outcomes Strategic Priorities Transfer Banter................................................................. 25 Our Partners Committees...................................................................... 29 Students First................................................................... 11 Board of Directors.......................................................... 31 Building on Shared Resources..................................... 17 The ONCAT Team........................................................... 32 Bringing Our Identity Full Circle Platforms for Collaboration ONTransfer.ca Website Redesign Message from the Board Co-Chairs This is an exciting year for the postsecondary system serving on ONCAT’s Board of Directors, it really has been and one in which Ontario’s colleges celebrate their a pleasure to be involved with an organization committed 50th anniversary. Throughout these past decades, to not only supporting the partnership aspirations of postsecondary education as a system and the relationship institutions, but also involving students and government in of colleges and universities, has evolved to one of a collective effort to expand student
    [Show full text]
  • CRSP NEWSLETTER Centre for Research on Security Practices
    J U N E 2 0 2 0 CRSP NEWSLETTER Centre for Research on Security Practices Welcome to the Inaugural CRSP Newsletter! We hope you and your loved ones are healthy and safe at this difficult time, including the global pandemic and ongoing global demonstrations. CRSP would like to express empathy and solidarity with those in our communities who are experiencing loss and apprehension. While we grapple with these new challenges to our personal and professional lives, we are also looking to maintain some form of routine and connection to others. We are therefore excited to share our inaugural newsletter that provides an update on CRSP activities. The newsletter will contribute to CRSP’s goal to continue to build relationships among a group of scholars whose common research interests are in security practices and human security in all its many forms. CRSP'S New Home With the generous support of Wilfrid Laurier University, CRSP has initiated the renovation of the second floor of Wilkes House (119 Darling Street, Brantford) for its new home. The new CRSP space will house offices, flex space, and a multipurpose meeting room where CRSP members will collaborate on research and spark new ideas related to security practices and human security. J U N E 2 0 2 0 True to its commitment of mentoring and teaching students, the new CRSP space will have ample work space for research assistants to work alongside CRSP-affiliated faculty, giving students valuable hands-on research experience. Connected to CRSP is the Craft of Intelligence Analysis Lab (CIAL). Funded by a Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI) grant, CIAL is equipped with microphones and observational equipment, data analytical software and an open workspace for conducting focus group interviews and observing interactions in small group work.
    [Show full text]
  • Services Available for Students with Lds at Ontario Colleges and Universities
    Services Available for Students with LDs at Ontario Colleges and Universities Institution Student Accessibilities Services Website Student Accessibilities Services Contact Information Algoma University http://www.algomau.ca/learningcentre/ 705-949-2301 ext.4221 [email protected] Algonquin College http://www.algonquincollege.com/accessibility-office/ 613-727-4723 ext.7058 [email protected] Brock University https://brocku.ca/services-students-disabilities 905-668-5550 ext.3240 [email protected] Cambrian College http://www.cambriancollege.ca/AboutCambrian/Pages/Accessibilit 705-566-8101 ext.7420 y.aspx [email protected] Canadore College http://www.canadorecollege.ca/departments-services/student- College Drive Campus: success-services 705-474-7600 ext.5205 Resource Centre: 705-474-7600 ext.5544 Commerce Court Campus: 705-474-7600 ext.5655 Aviation Campus: 705-474-7600 ext.5956 Parry Sound Campus: 705-746-9222 ext.7351 Carleton University http://carleton.ca/accessibility/ 613-520-5622 [email protected] Centennial College https://www.centennialcollege.ca/student-life/student- Ashtonbee Campus: services/centre-for-students-with-disabilities/ 416-289-5000 ext.7202 Morningside Campus: 416-289-5000 ext.8025 Progress Campus: 416-289-5000 ext.2627 Story Arts Centre: 416-289-5000 ext.8664 [email protected] Services Available for Students with LDs at Ontario Colleges and Universities Conestoga College https://www.conestogac.on.ca/accessibility-services/ 519-748-5220 ext.3232 [email protected] Confederation
    [Show full text]
  • Student Transitions Project Web­Based Resources
    Ontario Native Education Counselling Association Student Transitions Project Web­Based Resources Index Section Content Page 1 Schools and Education Institutions for First Nations, Inuit and Métis 3 ‐ Alternative Schools ‐ First Nations Schools ‐ Post‐Secondary Institutions in Ontario 2 Community Education Services 5 3 Aboriginal Student Centres, Colleges 6 4 Aboriginal Services, Universities 8 5 Organizations Supporting First Nations, Inuit and Métis 11 6 Language and Culture 12 7 Academic Support 15 8 For Counsellors and Educators 19 9 Career Support 23 10 Health and Wellness 27 11 Financial Assistance 30 12 Employment Assistance for Students and Graduates 32 13 Applying for Post‐Secondary 33 14 Child Care 34 15 Safety 35 16 Youth Voices 36 17 Youth Employment 38 18 Advocacy in Education 40 19 Social Media 41 20 Other Resources 42 This document has been prepared by the Ontario Native Education Counselling Association March 2011 ONECA Student Transitions Project Web‐Based Resources, March 2011 Page 2 Section 1 – Schools and Education Institutions for First Nations, Métis and Inuit 1.1 Alternative schools, Ontario Contact the local Friendship Centre for an alternative high school near you Amos Key Jr. E‐Learning Institute – high school course on line http://www.amoskeyjr.com/ Kawenni:io/Gaweni:yo Elementary/High School Six Nations Keewaytinook Internet High School (KiHS) for Aboriginal youth in small communities – on line high school courses, university prep courses, student awards http://kihs.knet.ca/drupal/ Matawa Learning Centre Odawa
    [Show full text]
  • OCAD University At-Large Faculty Senator Elections 2016 List of Candidates
    OCAD University At-Large Faculty Senator Elections 2016 List of Candidates: Michelle Astrug (Faculty of Design) Michelle Astrug is a tenure-track Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Design, teaching in Graphic Design. She is applying for senate because she is interested in actively participating in University governance. Claire Brunet (Faculty of Art) Claire Brunet is a sculptor and Associate Professor in Media and installation art; Sculpture/Installation program and Fabrication Studio Bronze Casting and Digital Processes at OCAD University in Toronto. In June 2014 Brunet completed a PhD degree in Fine Arts, in the Interdisciplinary Program (INDI) at Concordia University in Montreal. Her research work explores expanded spatial boundaries and the influence of a 3D digital and technological context on the artist’s creative process in sculpture practice. Brunet’s sculpture project proposes opposing temporal forces—a 3D digital and technological spatial approach as a mode of production, in opposition to a critical discourse in regard to living species and their relation to their natural environment—which stresses the opposing values of an hypermodern society (Lipovetsky 2005). Brunet has presented projects and papers at conferences in New Zealand, Australia, Belgium, Germany, Greece and Canada. Her publications include: Exploring Data Space, in The Faculty of Art Newsletter (OCAD U, Toronto, 2012); “Extending Spatial Boundaries Through Sculpture Practices: Exploring Natural and 3D Technological Environments” in The International Journal of the Arts in Society (Illinois: CG Publishing, 2012); McLuhan and Extended Environment: Affect and Effect of a 3D Digital Medium on Sculpture Practice, in Y. Van Den Eede, J. Bauwens, J. Beyl, M.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Communique #25: for NOSM Staff and Full-Time Faculty
    COVID-19 Communique #25: For NOSM Staff and Full-Time Faculty UPDATE: Parking on Campus during COVID-19 (for Staff and Faculty only): We recently communicated that employees should plan to work from home until at least the end of May 2021. As such, we will continue to provide free parking until May 31, 2021 to those who are required and authorized to be on the Lakehead University and Laurentian University campuses. During this time, NOSM will NOT process payroll deductions for parking. Payroll deductions for parking will resume on June 1, 2021 unless stated otherwise. For employees who have purchased the annual parking pass from either Lakehead or Laurentian University outside of the payroll deduction process, NOSM will provide a reimbursement for the period of January 1, 2021 to May 31, 2021, as follows: NOSM @ Lakehead Reimbursement of $147.50, which is equal to the pro-rated annual rate of $354/year (taxes included) for General (G) Parking Pass for the period of January 1, 2021 to May 31, 2021. NOSM @ Laurentian Reimbursement of $282.79, which is equal to the pro-rated annual reserved parking rate (Lot 11) of $678.70/year (taxes included) for the period of January 1, 2021 to May 31, 2021 OR; Reimbursement of $110.51, which is equal to the pro-rated annual general parking lot rate of $265.10/year (taxes included) for the period of January 1, 2021 to May 31, 2021. If you have purchased your parking-pass directly from the Universities, please submit the parking receipt for the parking pass and submit the expense reimbursement through electronic expense reimbursement on MyNOSM.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Mandate Agreement
    STRATEGIC MANDATE AGREEMENT Lakehead University Ministry of Advanced Education and Skills Development 2017- 20 SIGNED for and on behalf of the Ministry of SIGNED for and on behalf of Lakehead University by: Advanced Education and Skills Development by: Brian Stevenson President October 24, 2017 Date Date " t?ontario !!!Lakehead -:::::"'UN I VERSITY Table of Contents Section 1: Introduction Preamble Institutional Vision, Mission, Mandate Aspirations Section 2: Shared Objectives and Priorities for Differentiation 1.0 Student Experience 2.0 Innovation in Teaching and Learning Excellence 3.0 Access and Equity 4.0 Applied Research and Excellence Impact 5.0 Innovation, Economic Development and Community Engagement Section 3: Strategy, Sustainability and Partnerships 6.0 Enrolment Strategy & Program Direction • International Strategy • Strategic Areas of Program Strength and Expansion • Financial Sustainability 7.0 Institutional Collaborations and Partnerships Section 4: Ministry Commitments 1 Preamble This Strategic Mandate Agreement between the Ministry of Advanced Education and Skills Development and Lakehead University outlines the role the University currently performs in Ontario’s postsecondary education system and how it will build on its current strengths to achieve its vision and help drive system-wide objectives and government priorities. The Strategic Mandate Agreement (SMA): • Identifies and explains the shared objectives and priorities between the Ontario government and the University; • Outlines current and future areas of program strength; • Supports the current vision, mission, and mandate of the University and established areas of strength within the context of the University’s governing legislation; • Describes the agreed-upon elements of the new university funding model, including: o a University’s enrolment plans as well as their projections of their enrolments relative to their corridor midpoint and any desired changes to their corridor during the period of this SMA; and o differentiation areas of focus including metrics and targets.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Accreditation Matter for Art & Design Schools in Canada?
    College Quarterly Winter 2013 - Volume 16 Number 1 (../index.html) Does Accreditation Matter for Art & Design Schools in Canada? Home By Reiko (Leiko) Shimizu (../index.html) Studio-based degrees in fine arts and design are not often written Contents about in higher education literature. Perhaps it is because art and design (index.html) education is misunderstood – students are viewed as “finding themselves” or have unrealistic dreams of becoming the next big artist. Perhaps the studio-based nature of the curriculum does not intrigue researchers to write about issues that concern it, or perhaps it is because anyone can call themself an artist without having an academic credential. Ten years ago, urban theorist Richard Florida coined the term the “creative class” as individuals who “do a wide variety of work in a wide variety of industries – from technology to entertainment, journalism to finance, high- end manufacturing to the arts….they share a common ethos that values creativity, individuality, difference, and merit” (Florida, 2002, para. 8). According to Florida the creative class helps build economic development; therefore, our cities should be nurtured to be more inviting to these types of individuals. This emphasis on culture and creativity is at the foundation of art and design education. Groys (2009) argues that art education is complicated and subjective; it ultimately has no rules and that “teaching art means teaching life” (as cited in Madoff, 2009, p. 27). If that is the case, how does one measure quality in a field that is viewed as so subjective? How does one define and value art and design education? One’s notion of good art and design can be vastly different from another’s, and both views may come from experts in the field.
    [Show full text]