DOCSLIB.ORG

Volume 1, Chapter 8-1: Nutrient Relations: Requirements and Sources

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Volume 1, Chapter 8-1: Nutrient Relations: Requirements and Sources Glime, J. M. 2017. Nutrient Relations: Requirements and Sources. Chapt. 8-1. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 1. 8-1-1 Physiological Ecology. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 17 July 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 8-1 NUTRIENT RELATIONS: REQUIREMENTS AND SOURCES TABLE OF CONTENTS What Do Bryophytes Require? ........................................................................................................................... 8-1-2 Nutrient Requirements ........................................................................................................................................ 8-1-2 Macronutrients ............................................................................................................................................. 8-1-4 Nitrogen ................................................................................................................................................ 8-1-4 Phosphorus ............................................................................................................................................ 8-1-5 N:P Ratios ............................................................................................................................................. 8-1-6 Calcium and Magnesium ...................................................................................................................... 8-1-6 Iron ........................................................................................................................................................ 8-1-7 Micronutrients .............................................................................................................................................. 8-1-7 Boron .................................................................................................................................................... 8-1-7 Copper ................................................................................................................................................... 8-1-7 Heavy Metals ........................................................................................................................................ 8-1-9 Nutrient Content ................................................................................................................................................ 8-1-10 Habitat Differences .................................................................................................................................... 8-1-10 Streams ............................................................................................................................................... 8-1-10 Bogs and Fens ..................................................................................................................................... 8-1-10 Forests ................................................................................................................................................. 8-1-11 Arctic and Alpine ................................................................................................................................ 8-1-12 Species Differences .................................................................................................................................... 8-1-12 Adaptability and Acclimation .................................................................................................................... 8-1-13 Plant Nutrient Locations.................................................................................................................................... 8-1-14 Cell Wall Sites ........................................................................................................................................... 8-1-15 Intracellular Sites ....................................................................................................................................... 8-1-16 Vertical Distribution .................................................................................................................................. 8-1-16 Nutrient Sources ................................................................................................................................................ 8-1-17 Precipitation ............................................................................................................................................... 8-1-17 Bogs .................................................................................................................................................... 8-1-18 Atmospheric Dust ...................................................................................................................................... 8-1-18 Soil ............................................................................................................................................................. 8-1-19 Micronutrients ............................................................................................................................................ 8-1-19 Litter and the Role of Trees ....................................................................................................................... 8-1-21 Decomposition ........................................................................................................................................... 8-1-22 Snow .......................................................................................................................................................... 8-1-22 The Salmon Story and Other Animals ....................................................................................................... 8-1-23 Fungal Partners .......................................................................................................................................... 8-1-24 pH Relationships ............................................................................................................................................... 8-1-25 Protective Devices ............................................................................................................................................. 8-1-25 Seasonal Nutrient Behavior ............................................................................................................................... 8-1-27 Effects on Species Composition ........................................................................................................................ 8-1-27 Summary ........................................................................................................................................................... 8-1-28 Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................................. 8-1-28 Literature Cited ................................................................................................................................................. 8-1-28 8-1-2 Chapter 8-1: Nutrient Relations: Requirements CHAPTER 8-1 NUTRIENT RELATIONS: REQUIREMENTS Figure 1. Mosses growing on an old iron stove, demonstrating their rather low nutrient requirements. Photo by Janice Glime. What Do Bryophytes Require? Bowen (1933) claimed that bryophytes are necessarily elements (micronutrients) (Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu, Ni, B, Mo, and limited in nutrient supply by their poikilohydric (state of Cl) are essential (Welch 1995). These seem to be hydration controlled by environment) method of water important for bryophytes as well, but in lower regulation. Their method of receipt of water – concentrations. Nevertheless, the levels of requirements predominantly from rainfall and, for most bryophytes, and tolerance can vary widely not only among species, but almost nothing from ground water – relegates them to also within species (Shaw 1988). receive nutrients that are dissolved in rainwater or that Most knowledge about nutrient requirements of accumulate as dust. After the first few minutes of rainfall, bryophytes comes from culturing them (Voth 1943; Brown those nutrient concentrations are extremely small compared 1982), although more recently we have learned much to soil nutrients and are biased in their relative through the effects of atmospheric pollution. We soon concentrations in very different ways. Therefore, it is not learned that concentrations that favored the growth of surprising that culture conditions designed for tracheophytes in the laboratory were too strong for the tracheophytes are often unsuitable for bryophytes. But is poikilohydric bryophytes, and dilutions of 10:1 seemed this what the bryophytes "prefer"? Or are these conditions more satisfactory. they tolerate and that provide them relatively less Hoffman (1966) performed a complex set of competition from tracheophytes? And do they gain any experiments on the moss Funaria hygrometrica (Figure 2) nutrients from the soil? in which he determined anion (N:P:S) and cation (K:Ca:Mg) combination effects. In his anion experiments, Nutrient Requirements the absence of any of the three nutrients caused poor Even in the slow-growing bryophytes, nutrients can be protonemal growth and no gametophores. On the other a major determinant of both species composition and hand, the protonemata responded quite differently from the diversity (Raabe et al. 2010; Stevens et al. 2010; Schrijver
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Habitat and Microsite Influence Demography of Two
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2013 Population Dynamics And Environmental Factors Influencing Herbs In Intact And Degraded Florida Rosemary Scrub Elizabeth Stephens University of Central Florida Part of the Biology Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Doctoral Dissertation (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Stephens, Elizabeth, "Population Dynamics And Environmental Factors Influencing Herbs In Intact And Degraded Florida Rosemary Scrub" (2013). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 2822. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/2822 POPULATION DYNAMICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS INFLUENCING HERBS IN INTACT AND DEGRADED FLORIDA ROSEMARY SCRUB by ELIZABETH L. STEPHENS M.S. Purdue University, 2005 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Science in the Department of Biology in the College of Sciences at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 2013 Major Professor: Pedro F. Quintana-Ascencio © 2013 Elizabeth L. Stephens ii ABSTRACT Species have complex and contextual relationships with their environment; both the relative contributions of life-history stages to population growth and the effect of environmental factors on each stage can be different among co-existing species. Timing and extent of reproduction, survival, and mortality determine population growth, species distributions, and assemblage patterns. I evaluate the role of habitat (intact, degraded) and microsite (shrub, leaf litter, bare sand) on population dynamics of Florida scrub herbs.
    [Show full text]
  • (Warnstorfia Fluitans (Hedw.) Loeske) from a High Arctic Lake: Effect of Nutrient Concentration Tenna Riis,1,2 Birgit Olesen,1 Casper K
    ARCTIC VOL. 63, NO. 1 (MARCH 2010) P. 100–106 Growth Rate of an Aquatic Bryophyte (Warnstorfia fluitans (Hedw.) Loeske) from a High Arctic Lake: Effect of Nutrient Concentration Tenna RIIS,1,2 BIrgIT OLESen,1 CASPer K. Katborg1 and KIRSten S. ChrIStoFFerSen3 (Received 12 September 2008; accepted in revised form 7 April 2009) ABSTRACT. The High Arctic is one of the regions most susceptible to climate change on a global scale. Increased temperature, precipitation, and cloud cover are anticipated in the region, with consequent increases in nutrient runoff to surface waters. Mosses are often the dominant submerged macrophyte in Arctic and High Arctic lakes. If the growth rate of mosses in these lakes is nutrient-limited, then production could increase with climate changes that result in higher nutrient concentrations. We conducted a laboratory study to 1) measure the growth response of Warnstorfia fluitans (Hedw.) Loeske from a High Arctic lake to nitrogen and phosphorus availability; and 2) determine whether growth rate was N- or P-limited by examining its relationship to internal P and N content. The growth rates of W. fluitans were generally low, ranging from 0.003 to 0.012 day-1. The growth rates increased with increasing plant P content, but not with increasing N content, indicating that moss growth was P-limited at low P availability in the experiment. Critical plant P concentration for maximum growth rate was 0.086% dry weight. This is the first time a critical P threshold has been calculated. The results imply that if climate changes result in increased P concentrations in surface waters, a higher production of moss could occur in High Arctic lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of Publications 1974 – 2019
    W. SZAFER INSTITUTE OF BOTANY POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES Ryszard Ochyra BIBLIOGRAPHY OF PUBLICATIONS 1974 – 2019 KRAKÓW 2019 Ochyraea tatrensis Váňa Part I. Monographs, Books and Scientific Papers Part I. Monographs, Books and Scientific Papers 5 1974 001. Ochyra, R. (1974): Notatki florystyczne z południowo‑wschodniej części Kotliny Sandomierskiej [Floristic notes from southeastern part of Kotlina Sandomierska]. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego 360 Prace Botaniczne 2: 161–173 [in Polish with English summary]. 002. Karczmarz, K., J. Mickiewicz & R. Ochyra (1974): Musci Europaei Orientalis Exsiccati. Fasciculus III, Nr 101–150. 12 pp. Privately published, Lublini. 1975 003. Karczmarz, K., J. Mickiewicz & R. Ochyra (1975): Musci Europaei Orientalis Exsiccati. Fasciculus IV, Nr 151–200. 13 pp. Privately published, Lublini. 004. Karczmarz, K., K. Jędrzejko & R. Ochyra (1975): Musci Europaei Orientalis Exs‑ iccati. Fasciculus V, Nr 201–250. 13 pp. Privately published, Lublini. 005. Karczmarz, K., H. Mamczarz & R. Ochyra (1975): Hepaticae Europae Orientalis Exsiccatae. Fasciculus III, Nr 61–90. 8 pp. Privately published, Lublini. 1976 006. Ochyra, R. (1976): Materiały do brioflory południowej Polski [Materials to the bry‑ oflora of southern Poland]. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego 432 Prace Botaniczne 4: 107–125 [in Polish with English summary]. 007. Ochyra, R. (1976): Taxonomic position and geographical distribution of Isoptery‑ giopsis muelleriana (Schimp.) Iwats. Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica 22: 129–135 + 1 map as insertion [with Polish summary]. 008. Karczmarz, K., A. Łuczycka & R. Ochyra (1976): Materiały do flory ramienic środkowej i południowej Polski. 2 [A contribution to the flora of Charophyta of central and southern Poland. 2]. Acta Hydrobiologica 18: 193–200 [in Polish with English summary].
    [Show full text]
  • Mosses: Weber and Wittmann, Electronic Version 11-Mar-00
    Catalog of the Colorado Flora: a Biodiversity Baseline Mosses: Weber and Wittmann, electronic version 11-Mar-00 Amblystegiaceae Amblystegium Bruch & Schimper, 1853 Amblystegium serpens (Hedwig) Bruch & Schimper var. juratzkanum (Schimper) Rau & Hervey WEBER73B. Amblystegium juratzkanum Schimper. Calliergon (Sullivant) Kindberg, 1894 Calliergon cordifolium (Hedwig) Kindberg WEBER73B; HERMA76. Calliergon giganteum (Schimper) Kindberg Larimer Co.: Pingree Park, 2960 msm, 25 Sept. 1980, [Rolston 80114), !Hermann. Calliergon megalophyllum Mikutowicz COLO specimen so reported is C. richardsonii, fide Crum. Calliergon richardsonii (Mitten) Kindberg WEBER73B. Campyliadelphus (Lindberg) Chopra, 1975 KANDA75 Campyliadelphus chrysophyllus (Bridel) Kanda HEDEN97. Campylium chrysophyllum (Bridel) J. Lange. WEBER63; WEBER73B; HEDEN97. Hypnum chrysophyllum Bridel. HEDEN97. Campyliadelphus stellatus (Hedwig) Kanda KANDA75. Campylium stellatum (Hedwig) C. Jensen. WEBER73B. Hypnum stellatum Hedwig. HEDEN97. Campylophyllum Fleischer, 1914 HEDEN97 Campylophyllum halleri (Hedwig) Fleischer HEDEN97. Nova Guinea 12, Bot. 2:123.1914. Campylium halleri (Hedwig) Lindberg. WEBER73B; HERMA76. Hypnum halleri Hedwig. HEDEN97. Campylophyllum hispidulum (Bridel) Hedenäs HEDEN97. Campylium hispidulum (Bridel) Mitten. WEBER63,73B; HEDEN97. Hypnum hispidulum Bridel. HEDEN97. Cratoneuron (Sullivant) Spruce, 1867 OCHYR89 Cratoneuron filicinum (Hedwig) Spruce WEBER73B. Drepanocladus (C. Müller) Roth, 1899 HEDEN97 Nomen conserv. Drepanocladus aduncus (Hedwig) Warnstorf WEBER73B.
    [Show full text]
  • Prescribed Fire, Soil, and Plants: Burn Effects and Interactions in the Central Great Basin Benjamin M
    Rangeland Ecol Manage 61:169–181 | March 2008 Prescribed Fire, Soil, and Plants: Burn Effects and Interactions in the Central Great Basin Benjamin M. Rau,1 Jeanne C. Chambers,2 Robert R. Blank,3 and Dale W. Johnson4 Authors are 1Graduate Research Assistant, University of Nevada, Reno, Hydrolologic Sciences Program, 1000 Valley Rd, Reno, NV 89512, USA; 2Research Ecologist, USDA Forest Service RMRS, 920 Valley Rd, Reno, NV 89512, USA; 3Soil Scientist, USDA ARS, 920 Valley Rd, Reno, NV 89512, USA; and 4Soil Scientist, University of Nevada, Reno, Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Science, 1000 Valley Rd, Reno, NV 89512, USA. Abstract Pinyon and juniper expansion into sagebrush ecosystems results in decreased cover and biomass of perennial grasses and forbs. We examine the effectiveness of spring prescribed fire on restoration of sagebrush ecosystems by documenting burn effects on soil nutrients, herbaceous aboveground biomass, and tissue nutrient concentrations. This study was conducted in a central Nevada woodland and included control and burn treatment plots sampled before and after a prescribed fire. Six native understory plant species (Crepis acuminata, Eriogonum umbellatum, Eriogonum elatum, Poa secunda secunda, Festuca idahoensis, and Lupinus argenteus) important for native sagebrush obligate foragers were chosen to represent the understory plant community. L. argenteus is also important for system nutrient cycling and nitrogen fixation. Plants were collected from three microsites (under tree canopy, under shrub canopy, and interspace) common in transitional woodlands during peak growth the summer before a spring prescribed burn and each of two summers following the burn. Soils were collected from corresponding locations at two depth intervals (0–8 and 8–52 cm) to determine the relationships between soil and plant nutrients following fire.
    [Show full text]
  • NATURAL RESOURCES a S S O C I a T E O F S C I E N C E I N N a T U R a L R E S O U R C E S – 90 C R E D I T S
    NATURAL RESOURCES ASSOCIATE OF SCIENCE IN NATURAL RESOURCES – 90 CREDITS CAREER DESCRIPTION ACCEPTANCE REQUIREMENTS Once the AS degree is completed, there are a number of other UCC courses that meet additional requirements for a The Associate of Science degree in Natural Resources gives Students are required to take college placement tests to Bachelor of Science degree at OSU or that can be used for students a comprehensive educational foundation for determine skill level and readiness for college-level individual specialization options. Consult your advisor to careers related to natural resource science and technology. courses. Coursework from accredited high schools, learn more about these. This program prepares students for jobs in conservation colleges and universities will be accepted in accordance OSU Baccalaureate Core Equivalents: science, wildlife biology, fisheries science, botany, forestry, with college policies and with the approval of the Science BI 211 Principles of Biology I1 5 ecosystem management, watershed management and other Department Chair. BI 212 Principles of Biology II1 5 fields related to natural resource science and conservation. BI 213 Principles of Biology III1 5 The program takes advantage of the diversity of resources PROGRAM INFORMATION ENG 230 Environmental Literature 4 available on nearby public lands, and the expertise of local 1 Students who graduate with an Associate of Science degree G 221 Environmental Geology 4 professionals who manage those lands, to provide a mix of in Natural Resources will be well-trained for entry-level jobs MTH 111 College Algebra 5 classroom, lab and field experiences not found at any other 1 in the natural resource economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change: the IPCC 1990 and 1992 Assessments 1
    CLIMATE CHANGE: The IPCC 1990 and 1992 Assessments CLIMATE CHANGE: The 1990 and 1992 IPCC Assessments IPCC First Assessment Report Overview and Policymaker Summaries and 1992 IPPC Supplement June. 1992 Published with the support of:* Australia Austria Canada France Germany Japan The Netherlands Norway Spain United Kingdom United States of America WMO UNEP © Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 1992 Printed in Canada Climate Change: The IPCC 1990 and 1992 Assessments 1. Climate Changes I. Title II. IPCC ISBN: 0-662-19821-2 ® Tills paper contains a minimum of 60% recyded fibres, mduding 10%posn»nsumei fibres ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Cover Photographs Top Image A composite colour image of GOES satellite using visible and infrared channels. This image was produced by the Data Integration Division, Climate Adaptation Branch, Canadian Climate Centre. Middle Image A full global disc satellite image (Channel Visible 2) for 4 September 1983 reproduced with the permission of EUMETSAT. Bottom Image A full earth disc view of cloud patterns over the Australian region on 19 February 1991 from the Japanese Geostationary Satellite (GMS4). This image is a colour enhanced composite of information from the visible and infrared channels produced by the Australian Centre for Remote Sensing of the Australian Survey and Land Information Group. *Notes Spain - Instituto Nacional de Meteorología üi TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface vü Foreword ix 1992 IPCC Supplement 1 IPCC First Assessment Report: 47 Overview 51 Policymaker Summary of Working Group I (Scientific Assessment
    [Show full text]
  • 1 JOAN G. EHRENFELD June 2009 HOME CONTACT INFORMATION
    1 JOAN G. EHRENFELD June 2009 HOME CONTACT INFORMATION: 44 North 7th Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904. WORK CONTACT INFORMATION: Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources, School of Environmental Biology, Rutgers University, 14 College Farm Road, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 Phone 732-572-9372 FAX 732-932-8746 Email: [email protected] EDUCATION: 1975 Ph.D. City University of New York, Biology. 1970 M.A. Harvard University, Biology. 1969 B.A. Barnard College, Columbia University, magna cum laude with honors in Biology. EMPLOYMENT: 1997 - Professor, Department of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources 1990- 2009 Director, New Jersey Water Resources Research Institute 1996 - 1997. Associate Professor, Department of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, and Director, New Jersey Water Resources Research Institute 1990-1996. Associate Professor and Director, Division of Water Resources, Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences, Rutgers University. Tenure awarded April 1993. 1987-1990: Associate Research Professor, Center for Coastal and Environmental Studies, Rutgers University. (50% time; partly grant-funded) 1976-1987: Assistant Research Professor, Center for Coastal and Environmental Studies, Rutgers University. (50% time; grant-funded) RESEARCH GRANTS: (* competitively awarded) *2008: Risk factors for West Nile Virus: the role of biodiversity in the ecology of hosts, vectors and humans. U. S. EPA STAR. $749,994 (PI; co-PIs are B. Johnson, M. Sukhdeo, N. Tsipoura, R. Jordan). 2008: Helen and William Mazer Foundation: Effects of Deer Overbrowse on Carbon Stocks and Fluxes in New Jersey Forests. $11,000. 2008: N. J. Dept. of Environmental Protection. Assessing the Potential for New Jersey Forests to Sequester Carbon and Contribute to Greenhouse Gas Emissions Avoidance.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 12 Productivity
    Glime, J. M. 2017. Productivity. Chapt. 12. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 1. Physiological Ecology. Ebook 12-1-1 sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 18 July 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 12 PRODUCTIVITY TABLE OF CONTENTS Productivity .......................................................................................................................................................... 12-2 Ecological Factors ................................................................................................................................................ 12-2 Ability to Invade ........................................................................................................................................... 12-2 Niche Differences ......................................................................................................................................... 12-3 Growth ................................................................................................................................................................. 12-3 Growth Measurements .................................................................................................................................. 12-4 Annual Length Increase ................................................................................................................................ 12-8 Uncoupling ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Caching at the Microsite Scale: P R a R U TM U LT ENT of AGRIC Pacific Northwest Region Clark’S Nutcracker Cache Site Selection, Part III 2011
    United States Department of Agriculture D E E Forest Service Caching at the Microsite Scale: P R A R U TM U LT ENT OF AGRIC Pacific Northwest Region Clark’s Nutcracker Cache Site Selection, Part III 2011 WITH EASE, nutcrackers fly into the canopies of trees, What microsites did ground caches were placed poke at the bark, and tussle bunches of lichen. Why? They’re nutcrackers select for within 9 m of a tree offering placing more than half the seeds they collect up in the seed caches in this study? possible cover. There was no canopies of living trees, a good way to keep seeds out of the significant selection for sites deep winter snow, but not good places for young trees to We observed 655 caches germinate and grow. How important is microsite, anyway? placed by 12 resident with a particular slope, aspect, nutcrackers; 450 ponderosa or ground cover type. BACKGROUND seed caches, 199 whitebark Why does it matter? We investigated habitat use, caching behavior, and seed caches, and 6 caches migratory patterns in Clark’s nutcrackers in the Pacific of an unknown seed type. The caching behavior of Northwest using radio telemetry. Over 4 years (2006– Among ponderosa and nutcrackers in autumn 2009), we captured 54 adult nutcrackers at 10 sites in the whitebark pine caches, they determines patterns of Cascade and Olympic Mountains in Washington State. cached 59 percent of seeds regeneration in whitebark We fitted nutcrackers with a back-pack style harness. above ground in the forest pine. This is because The battery life on the radio tags was 450 days, and canopy (385 caches) and the nutcrackers subsist year- we tracked nutcrackers year-round, on foot (to obtain remaining 41 percent below round on pine seeds, which behavior observations) and via aircraft (to obtain point ground in soil, gravel, or are produced only in autumn, locations).
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide to the Moss Genera in New Jersey by Keith Bowman
    Field Guide to the Moss Genera in New Jersey With Coefficient of Conservation and Indicator Status Keith Bowman, PhD 10/20/2017 Acknowledgements There are many individuals that have been essential to this project. Dr. Eric Karlin compiled the initial annotated list of New Jersey moss taxa. Second, I would like to recognize the contributions of the many northeastern bryologists that aided in the development of the initial coefficient of conservation values included in this guide including Dr. Richard Andrus, Dr. Barbara Andreas, Dr. Terry O’Brien, Dr. Scott Schuette, and Dr. Sean Robinson. I would also like to acknowledge the valuable photographic contributions from Kathleen S. Walz, Dr. Robert Klips, and Dr. Michael Lüth. Funding for this project was provided by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2, State Wetlands Protection Development Grant, Section 104(B)(3); CFDA No. 66.461, CD97225809. Recommended Citation: Bowman, Keith. 2017. Field Guide to the Moss Genera in New Jersey With Coefficient of Conservation and Indicator Status. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, New Jersey Forest Service, Office of Natural Lands Management, Trenton, NJ, 08625. Submitted to United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2, State Wetlands Protection Development Grant, Section 104(B)(3); CFDA No. 66.461, CD97225809. i Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Descriptions
    [Show full text]
  • Microsite Influences on Variability in Douglas-Fir Seedling Development
    Microsite Influences on Variability in Douglas-Fir Seedling Development Owen Burney, Michael G. Wing, and Robin Rose We examined the microsite characteristics of 6,048 Douglas-fir seedlings at three regeneration sites in Washington state. Our objective was to determine the microsite characteristics that were most influential on seedling growth change over time. We analyzed microsite influences both individually and in concert with one another through regression-based techniques. Microsite parameters included soil impedance, topographic, and physical parameter measurements that were recorded at each seedling’s location. Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) was used to determine combinations of microsite parameters that were most strongly correlated with seedling growth. Multiparameter models explained between 15 and 39 percent of the variance in diameter growth. Prevalent terms from the strongest multiparameter models included soil penetration, log presence, stump presence, skid road presence, and topography. Individual microsite parameters for each regeneration site were also assessed for importance in explaining diameter growth using two additional methods. The first approach was to isolate the parameters that appeared in the strongest multiparameter models and to sum and contrast the AIC weights of all models in which they appeared. The second approach was to regress single parameters against seedling diameter growth. Results varied by site for both methods. AIC weight sums revealed that topographical depression and berms, the presences of logs and stumps, and soil penetration (pounds per square inch) as measured by a penetrometer were ABSTRACT most influential, with values ranging from 0.31 (berm) to 0.82 (log). Regression analysis revealed that topographical depression, log presence, and soil penetration were significantly related to diameter growth, explaining between 6 and 29 percent of the variance in diameter growth.
    [Show full text]