UNJ June 2006

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UNJ June 2006 C To Circ or Not to Circ: Indications, O N Risks, and Alternatives to T I N Circumcision in the Pediatric U I Population with Phimosis N G Barbara Steadman Pamela Ellsworth E D gyptian mummies and Circumcision, the removal of the foreskin, is perhaps the oldest iden- U wall carvings offer some tified and currently the most frequently performed elective surgical C of the earliest recorded procedure for males throughout the world. Neonatal circumcision history of circumcision may be performed for medical, cultural, or religious reasons. A review A Edating over 15,000 years ago. of risks and benefits of circumcision, individual indications for cir- T Ritualistic circumcision has been cumcision, as well as both medical and surgical alternatives to cir- I carried out in West Africa for cumcision in the pediatric population with phimosis are presented. O over 5,000 years and in the The intent is to offer providers and parents current information that N Middle East for at least 3,000 will assist them in making a responsible decision about pediatric cir- years (Warner & Strashin, 1981). cumcision. Muslims incorporated ritualistic circumcisions as a pubertal rite of passage into manhood among Soon the list of medical indica- Neonatal Circumcision: older boys. tions grew, and physicians in The World’s Most The transformation of this England and America began to Controversial Operation ancient ritual into a routine med- offer circumcision for masturba- ical operation began late in the Today, approximately 25% of tion, headache, strabismus, rectal men globally are circumcised for 19th century. This was primarily prolapse, asthma, enuresis, and the result of several published religious, cultural, medical, or gout (Gollaher, 1994). By the parental choice reasons (Moses, works by prominent physicians early 20th century, there was of the time. They believed that Bailey, & Ronald, 1998). They are near universal agreement among largely concentrated in the constriction of the glans by the physicians that circumcision prepuce led to nervous irritation United States, Canada, countries should be done on a routine in the Middle East and Asia with in other organ systems. Several basis. published works cited “reflex Muslim populations, and large Rates of circumcision began portions of Africa. Circumcision neuroses,” puzzling syndromes to drop in Britain in 1948, when with no somatic explanation, as is a widely observed religious a nationalized health care system practice performed almost uni- being caused by constriction of analyzed cost versus benefit. the glans (Alanis & Lucidi, 2004). versally among Jewish and Circumcision is currently avail- Islamic societies. Jewish males able through National Health are usually circumcised on the Barbara Steadman, MS, NP, is a Insurance for medical indica- 8th day after birth in a ceremony Urology Nurse Practitioner, UMass tions only. In the early 1970s, called the Bris Milah. Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, both the Australian and the A review of the literature MA. Canadian Pediatric Societies fol- about circumcision yields a mul- lowed, stating that routine titude of information that is Pamela Ellsworth, MD, is a Pediatric neonatal circumcision was not solidly anti or pro circumcision. Urologist, UMass Memorial Medical medically indicated. Despite The pro-circumcision argument Center, Worcester, MA. these changes, rates of circumci- is that infant circumcision pro- sion remained high in the United vides a valid prevention against Note: CE Objectives and Evaluation States. Form appear on page 197. infections and diseases. The UROLOGIC NURSING / June 2006 / Volume 26 Number 3 181 C Table 1. O Circumcision Incidence Percentage Rate by Region N Region Year T 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 I N Northeast 69.6 68.3 66.5 68.3 68.0 65.4 64.6 66.9 68.9 64.7 U North Central 80.1 79.8 80.9 81.6 82.9 81.4 81.4 81.0 81.0 77.8 I South 64.7 66.1 63.6 64.5 64.6 64.1 63.9 62.5 64.0 57.7 N West 34.2 42.6 36.3 38.0 38.3 36.7 37.3 40.9 32.6 31.4 G All Regions 62.7 64.1 60.2 62.8 63.2 61.5 62.4 63.1 60.1 55.9 E Source: Bollinger, 2005 D U C emphasis is on an increased risk chological problems interfere scientific evidence demonstrates of cancer and AIDS, arguing that with sexual health and well- potential medical benefits of A a full circumcision is the best being. Emphasis should be newborn male circumcision; T prevention over partial proce- placed upon individual solutions however, these data are not suffi- I dures or medical treatment to individual problems, depend- cient to recommend routine (Stuart, 2005). ing upon the degree of severity of neonatal circumcision” (Task O It is the general feeling of the phimosis, variation in cul- Force on Circumcision, 1999, p. N anti-circumcision advocates that ture, preferences, etc. Parents, 693). from an ethical or moral stand- who have the responsibility of point, routine infant circumci- making the decision on behalf of Epidemiology sion is an infringement of per- their sons should be made aware Circumcision today is uncom- sonal rights. Terms such as “bar- of the most recent literature con- mon in Asia, South America, baric” and “mutilation” are fre- cerning the potential health ben- Central America, and most of quently heard in association with efits and risks as well as alterna- Europe. In Canada, 48% of boys circumcision. A great majority of tives to circumcision. are circumcised; in the United anti-circumcision supporters are In the United States, the Kingdom, the number is approxi- extremists, and are not only American Academy of Pediatrics mately 24% (Blecher, 2001). against routine infant circumci- (AAP) (1971) has vacillated on its More recent surveys show a sion but also any form of circum- stance regarding circumcision. In continuing decline in the inci- cision or operation. Anti-circum- 1971, the American Academy of dence of circumcised males in cision proponents maintain that Pediatrics Task Force on Great Britain, and predict only phimosis is a rarity, occurring at Circumcision concluded that 1.5% of boys born today will be a frequency of only 1%. “there are no valid medical indi- circumcised by their 15th birth- However, recent literature cations for circumcision in the day if current trends continue reports that between 2.4% and neonatal period” (AAP, 1977, p. (Rickwood, 2000). 14% of uncircumcised youths 110). Similar views were Circumcision rates in the experience phimosis (Stuart, expressed in 1975 and 1977. United States vary according to 2005). When new evidence showed that racial, ethnic, and socioeconom- Both extremes suggest rou- circumcision effectively reduced ic factors, as well as geographic tine approaches with no consid- male urinary tract infections region. Whites are considerably eration for appropriate individ- (UTIs) and sexually transmitted more likely to be circumcised ual measures. A complete evalu- diseases, the AAP concluded that than blacks or Hispanics (81% ation and physical examination newborn male circumcision “has vs. 65% or 54%). Over the past of the genitalia and the expertise potential health benefits and 10 years, circumcision rates have in being able to identify any mal- advantages as well as disadvan- declined in Caucasians, Hispanics, formation before puberty is para- tages and risks” (Task Force on and African-Americans, but have mount. In that way, any abnor- Circumcision, 1989, p. 391). increased in Asians and American malities can be monitored, and However, the AAP returned to a Indians. In the United States, the conservative treatment can be more cautious view on routine frequency of circumcision varies initiated before physical and psy- circumcision, stating “existing directly with maternal educa- 182 UROLOGIC NURSING / June 2006 / Volume 26 Number 3 tion, a marker for socioeconomic Figure 1. C status (Laumann, Masi, & Physiologic Phimosis: Normal, Nonretractile O Zuckerman, 1997). Prepuce of Infancy Geographically, circumcision N rates have fluctuated over the T past 10 years. From 2002 to 2003, I declines occurred in all four regions of the United States. N Non-circumcision has been a U norm in the West for more than a I decade. The North Central Region continues to have the N highest incidence of circumci- G sion rates (see Table 1). Overall, it is estimated that E less than 60% of American boys are circumcised at birth. These D rates have changed since the U 1970s, when approximately 90% C of all newborn boys were circum- cised in the United States. A Changes in health care coverage T are likely to contribute further to I the decline of circumcision in the United States. Currently, 13 O states are no longer funding new- N born circumcision through Source: Belman, 1990 Medicaid as of 2004. Physiologic or Pathologic term, when applied to neonates, Table 2. Phimosis? refers to a physiologic process in Physiologic Preputial As a result of the declining which there may be an inability Retraction neonatal circumcision rate in the to retract the foreskin due to nat- Percentage of United States, pediatricians are urally occurring adhesions Boys Able to seeing more uncircumcised between the prepuce and glans. Age Retract Foreskin males than in the past. Many of The natural shedding of skin these physicians are unfamiliar cells from the foreskin lining and At birth 4% with the normal process of fore- the glans helps in the process of At 6 months 20% skin retraction, and will refer separation of these two struc- these male infants and children tures. The epithelial debris At 3 years 90% to pediatric urologists, recom- which has been shed forms a mending circumcision for phi- white cheesy substance known At 17 years 99% mosis. The term “phimosis” as infant smegma which accumu- Source: Choe, 2005 remains ambiguous to many lates under the foreskin.
Recommended publications
  • AMERICAN ACADEMY of PEDIATRICS Circumcision Policy
    AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS Task Force on Circumcision Circumcision Policy Statement ABSTRACT. Existing scientific evidence demonstrates the Australian College of Paediatrics emphasized potential medical benefits of newborn male circumci- that in all cases, the medical attendant should avoid sion; however, these data are not sufficient to recom- exaggeration of either risks or benefits of this proce- mend routine neonatal circumcision. In circumstances in dure.5 which there are potential benefits and risks, yet the pro- Because of the ongoing debate, as well as the pub- cedure is not essential to the child’s current well-being, lication of new research, it was appropriate to reeval- parents should determine what is in the best interest of the child. To make an informed choice, parents of all uate the issue of routine neonatal circumcision. This male infants should be given accurate and unbiased in- Task Force adopted an evidence-based approach to formation and be provided the opportunity to discuss analyzing the medical literature concerning circum- this decision. If a decision for circumcision is made, cision. The studies reviewed were obtained through procedural analgesia should be provided. a search of the English language medical literature from 1960 to the present and, additionally, through a ABBREVIATIONS. UTI, urinary tract infection; STD, sexually search of the bibliographies of the published studies. transmitted disease; NCHS, National Center for Health Statistics; DPNB, dorsal penile nerve block; SCCP, squamous cell carcinoma EPIDEMIOLOGY of the penis; HPV, human papilloma virus; HIV, human immu- nodeficiency virus. The percentage of male infants circumcised varies by geographic location, by religious affiliation, and, to some extent, by socioeconomic classification.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Pain Scores with Or Without Local Anaesthesia in Neonatal Circmcision Using Plastibell Technique at Plateau Stat
    A COMPARISON OF PAIN SCORES WITH OR WITHOUT LOCAL ANAESTHESIA IN NEONATAL CIRCMCISION USING PLASTIBELL TECHNIQUE AT PLATEAU STATE SPECIALIST HOSPITAL, JOS, NIGERIA A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE NATIONAL POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF NIGERIA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE FELLOWSHIP OF THE COLLEGE IN FAMILY MEDICINE (FMCFM) PART II FINAL EXAMINATION MAY 2010 BY DR.AMINU GANGO FIKIN DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY MEDICINE PLATEAU STATE SPECIALIST HOSPITAL, JOS, NIGERIA i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT My heartfelt gratitude goes to DR STEPHEN YOHANNA for his ingenuity, thorough supervision, guidance and encouragement throughout the entire period of my training and this work. I’m also grateful to DR PITMANG, DR LAR, DR LAABES, and DR INYANG for their contribution and criticism. My gratitude goes to all the consultants of Plateau State Specialist Hospital, Jos for contributing in one way or the other during my period of training. My sincere thanks goes to DR ABUBAKAR BALLA who provided me with shelter throughout the period of my training. ii DEDICATION To my children, AHMED, YUSUF, HADIJA, ALHAJI GONI, BA MAINA, AWULU and ABDULMUMINI, my wife, MOGOROM FATI MAINA GORIA, and my Mother and Father. Thank you for everything you are to me. iii CERTIFICATION This is to certify that Dr. Aminu G. FIKIN performed the study reported in this Dissertation at Plateau State Specialist Hospital under our supervision. We also supervised the writing of the dissertation. SUPERVISOR Dr. STEPHEN YOHANNA (BM, BCH; MPH; FMCGP; FWACP) CONSULTANT FAMILY PHYSICIAN EVANGEL HOSPITAL, JOS, NIGERIA SIGNATURE: ………………………………………………….. DATE: …………………………………………………………. HEAD OF DEPARTMENT Dr. INYANG OLUBUKUNOLA (MB, BS; FMCGP) CONSULTANT FAMILY PHYSICIAN PLATEAU STATE SPECIALIST HOSPITAL, JOS, NIGERIA SIGNATURE: ………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Fearful Symmetries: Essays and Testimonies Around Excision and Circumcision. Rodopi
    Fearful Symmetries Matatu Journal for African Culture and Society ————————————]^——————————— EDITORIAL BOARD Gordon Collier Christine Matzke Frank Schulze–Engler Geoffrey V. Davis Aderemi Raji–Oyelade Chantal Zabus †Ezenwa–Ohaeto TECHNICAL AND CARIBBEAN EDITOR Gordon Collier ———————————— ]^ ——————————— BOARD OF ADVISORS Anne V. Adams (Ithaca NY) Jürgen Martini (Magdeburg, Germany) Eckhard Breitinger (Bayreuth, Germany) Henning Melber (Windhoek, Namibia) Margaret J. Daymond (Durban, South Africa) Amadou Booker Sadji (Dakar, Senegal) Anne Fuchs (Nice, France) Reinhard Sander (San Juan, Puerto Rico) James Gibbs (Bristol, England) John A. Stotesbury (Joensuu, Finland) Johan U. Jacobs (Durban, South Africa) Peter O. Stummer (Munich, Germany) Jürgen Jansen (Aachen, Germany) Ahmed Yerma (Lagos, Nigeria)i — Founding Editor: Holger G. Ehling — ]^ Matatu is a journal on African and African diaspora literatures and societies dedicated to interdisciplinary dialogue between literary and cultural studies, historiography, the social sciences and cultural anthropology. ]^ Matatu is animated by a lively interest in African culture and literature (including the Afro- Caribbean) that moves beyond worn-out clichés of ‘cultural authenticity’ and ‘national liberation’ towards critical exploration of African modernities. The East African public transport vehicle from which Matatu takes its name is both a component and a symbol of these modernities: based on ‘Western’ (these days usually Japanese) technology, it is a vigorously African institution; it is usually
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation and Treatment of Acute Urinary Retention
    The Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 193–198, 2008 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Printed in the USA. All rights reserved 0736-4679/08 $–see front matter doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.06.039 Technical Tips EVALUATION AND TREATMENT OF ACUTE URINARY RETENTION Gary M. Vilke, MD,* Jacob W. Ufberg, MD,† Richard A. Harrigan, MD,† and Theodore C. Chan, MD* *Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Diego Medical Center, San Diego, California and †Department of Emergency Medicine, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Reprint Address: Gary M. Vilke, MD, Department of Emergency Medicine, UC San Diego Medical Center, 200 West Arbor Drive Mailcode #8676, San Diego, CA 92103 e Abstract—Acute urinary retention is a common presen- ETIOLOGY OF ACUTE URINARY RETENTION tation to the Emergency Department and is often simply treated with placement of a Foley catheter. However, var- Acute obstruction of urinary outflow is most often the ious cases will arise when this will not remedy the retention result of physical blockages or by urinary retention and more aggressive measures will be needed, particularly caused by medications. The most common cause of acute if emergent urological consultation is not available. This urinary obstruction continues to be benign prostatic hy- article will review the causes of urinary obstruction and pertrophy, with other obstructive causes listed in Table 1 systematically review emergent techniques and procedures (4). Common medications that can result in acute
    [Show full text]
  • Male Circumcision, HIV and Health: a Guide Male Circumcision, HIV and Health a Guide
    Male circumcision, HIV and health: A guide HIV and health: Male circumcision, Male circumcision, HIV and health A guide What do you know about male circumcision, HIV and health – and why does it matter? • Do you know about the campaign to medically circumcise boys and men? • Do you know why medical circumcision is promoted as part of HIV prevention? • Do you know what circumcision involves? • Do you know the pros and cons of circumcision for different people? A mass campaign of Medical Male Circumcision (MMC) is being rolled out in many African countries that are hard-hit by HIV/AIDS, in an effort to reduce new infections. Scientific studies have shown that MMC can cut the risk of a man contracting HIV from vaginal sex by up to 60%. The World Health Organisation (WHO) has recommended that the governments of countries worst affected by the epidemic should offer medical circumcision to all boys and men aged 15-49 years, and should consider circumcising all newborn males. The WHO points out that MMC on its own is not going to defeat the epidemic. It must be part of a comprehensive HIV prevention strategy that includes HIV counselling and testing, screening for other sexually transmitted infections, correct and consistent use of male and female condoms, safer sex practices and access to treatment for people who test HIV-positive. The South African Government has embarked on an intensive campaign to encourage 4.3 million boys and men to medically circumcise by 2015. It is critical that all men – whether HIV-negative or positive, straight or gay, young or old – and women, as partners and mothers, are well informed about MMC and its particular implications for them.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Possible Circumcisers in Australia and New Zealand
    List of Possible Circumcisers in Australia and New Zealand © The Circumcision Academy of Australia Inc Circumcision Academy of Australia Inc (CAA) PO Box 1776, Bondi Junction, NSW 2022 http://www.circumcisionaustralia.org © 2011 The Gilgal Society Last updated 2 Oct 2019 Introduction This booklet applies to male circumcision only, not other aspects of the medical practice of the doctors or medical practices listed. The names, addresses, and other information in this booklet are given in good faith and are believed to be correct at the time of printing. They have been gathered together from a variety of sources including personal recommendations, radio, newspaper and magazine advertising. It should be noted that some doctors may have moved or ceased practice since the information was obtained. The CAA recognizes that there are many other doctors who perform circumcisions. The list only includes those the CAA is aware of. The list includes doctors who do infant circumcisions, as well as circumcision of older children, adolescents and men. Some only circumcise infants, whereas some only circumcise older males, and some do circumcisions for any age. This is stated where known, but circumstances do change and the CAA does not always have full details of the latest practice. Some of the doctors and clinics listed will only circumcise where there is a clear medical need (but in some cases psychological need will be considered). Some, including those mohelim who are not doctors, will only circumcise infants. Phimosis is a common reason for circumcision. Prevention of risk of an adverse condition, infection or cancer in the future is regarded by some as a medically valid reason for circumcision.
    [Show full text]
  • African Fig Trees and Fig Wasps
    African tig trees and tig wasps Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Verhandelingen Afdeling Natuurkunde, Tweede Reeks, Deel 89 African fig trees and fig wasps C.C. BERG AND J.T. WIEBES North-Holland, AmsterdamlOxford/New YorklTokyo, 1992 C.C. BERG The Norwegian Arboretum, N-5067 Store Milde, Norway l .T . WIEBES Florijn 13, 2353 TC Leiderdorp, The Netherlands ISBN 0-444-85741-9 Contents I. Introduction 7 Referenee 8 11. Biology of figs and fig wasps Introduetion 9 The development of the figs 9 The habits of fig trees II The leaves l3 Stipules and buds 14 The position and size of the figs 14 The strueture of the fig 15 The flowers 17 The staminate flowers 18 The pistillate flowers 19 The pollinators 22 Colonization of the syeonia 24 Oviposition and pollination 25 Eclosion from the galls and mating of the was ps 26 Eclosion from the syeonium 28 The number of otTspring and the sex-ratio of the wasps 28 Phenology 28 The infrueteseenee and the fruitlets 30 Dispersal 31 Germination 31 Hybridization 32 The classifieation of the figs 33 The classifieation of the pollinators 36 Comparison of the classifieations of figs and wasps 37 The origin and development of the symbiosis 39 Parasitoids and predators 41 References 43 In. The genus Ficus in Afriea Introduction 47 Taxonomie history 47 Distribution 48 Diagnosis of the genus Ficus L. 51 Keys to the sections 51 Keys to the species 52 African groups and species 62 Introduced species 166 Reference 167 IV. The African fig wasps Introduction 169 Key to the genera 170 African groups and species 173 References 192 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Dorsal Slit Preputioplasty for Phimosis: a Prepuce Conserving Surgery
    International Surgery Journal Arora BK et al. Int Surg J. 2016 Aug;3(3):1543-1546 http://www.ijsurgery.com pISSN 2349-3305 | eISSN 2349-2902 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20162744 Research Article Dorsal slit preputioplasty for phimosis: a prepuce conserving surgery Bhavinder K. Arora1*, Rachit Arora2, Akshit Arora2 1 Department of Surgery, Pt BD Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India 2MBBS Student, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India Received: 26 May 2016 Accepted: 02 July 2016 *Correspondence: Dr. Bhavinder K. Arora, E-mail: [email protected] Copyright: © the author(s), publisher and licensee Medip Academy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. ABSTRACT Background: Phimosis is narrowing of prepuce leading to non-retraction behind glans penis. Phimosis is physiological in majority of patients. Pathological phimosis gives rise to symptoms of urinary tract infection and balanoposthitis. Most of patients with phimosis are subjected to circumcision. Instead of circumcision, a conservative surgical approach preputioplasty can be done as a prepuce salvage procedure. Methods: Patients suffering from urinary tract symptoms and persistent narrowing of phimotic ring and recurrent balanoposthitis were subjected to this prepuce salvage surgery. The dorsal slit preputioplasty was performed in these patients. Results: All patients were operated under local anaesthesia in outpatient department. The mean operative time was 10 minutes. No major complication was seen in any of these patients. Oedema of prepuce, haematoma and mild inflammation was noticed in a small number of patients.
    [Show full text]
  • Boys: Circumcision & Testicular Issues
    1/24/20 Boys: Circumcision & Testicular Issues Abhishek Seth, MD, FRCS(C), FAAP Urology 1 Outline Acute Scrotum Circumcision & Penile Problems • Testicular torsion • Balanoposthitis • Torsion of the appendix testis • Paraphimosis • Epididymitis/orchitis • Hair tourniquet • Incarcerated hernia 2 1 1/24/20 Acute Scrotum • Appendage torsion • Scrotal edema or erythema • Diaper dermatitis, insect bite, • Testis torsion misc. skin lesions • Epididymitis • Idiopathic scrotal edema • Infectious • Hernia or hydrocele • Sterile or traumatic • Inguinal hernia w/ or w/o incarceration • Orchitis • Communicating hydrocele • Assoc. with epididymitis • Varicocele w/ or w/o abscess • Vasculitis (Henoch- • Intrascrotal mass Schönlein purpura) • MSK pain from inguinal tendonitis • Viral illness (mumps) or muscle strain • Referred pain (ureteral calculus or anomaly) 3 Testis Torsion • May occur at any age • Most common during adolescence • 31% prepubertal • 5% > 30 yo • 1/4000 male patients under age 25 • Average age 18.5 • Increased risk of contralateral torsion • Right sided : Left sided = 5:3 4 2 1/24/20 What Causes Testicular Torsion? Older Child Neonate Intravaginal Torsion Extravaginal Torsion From "Torsion of the Testis" by L. L. Leape (p. 1331). In Pediatric Surgery (4th ed.), by K. J. Welch, J. G.Randolph, M. M. Ravitch, J. A.O'Neill, Jr., & M. I. Rowe, 1986, Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers 5 Torsion in an Adolescent Male • H&P • Low suspicion • High suspicion for torsion • Doppler ultrasound • Go straight to OR • ? Labs – Urine Analysis
    [Show full text]
  • What Can Wrong with Your Willy?
    WHAT CAN WRONG WITH YOUR WILLY? ANDREW LIENERT UROLOGIST ONESIXONE UROLOGY 161 GILLIES AVE, AUCKLAND IT CAN BEND IT CAN BREAK IT CAN GROW IT CAN SHRINK YOU CAN DECORATE IT PENILE CONDITIONS Foreskin + glans Shaft + corpora - phimosis - SCC - paraphimosis - balanitis - fordyce spots - frenular tear - fracture - skin bridges - peyronie’s - SCC - priapism - BXO - pearly papules - trauma - veruca - smegma PENILE ANATOMY PHIMOSIS PHIMOSIS: CHILDREN PHYSIOLOGICAL PATHOLOGICAL PHIMOSIS: CHILDREN TREATMENT PHYSIOLOGICAL PATHOLOGICAL - 95% newborns have - Infection phimosis - 10% 4 yr olds - Pain - ‘Ballooning’ common - Tight white band - Steroid cream - Less likely to - 0.05% betamethasone resolve with cream - 1% hydrocortisone - Apply BD 4-6 weeks - 60-90% success - ‘Stretching’ - circumcision PHIMOSIS: ADULT - Usually due to balitiis xerotica obliterans (BXO) or chronic infection / inflammation from poor hygiene or incontinence - BXO Beware of a - Male equivalent of lichen sclerosis tumour beneath - Chronic inflammation leading to fibrosis - White bands or patches a phimosis in - Thickening of skin older men - phimosis - Unlikely to resolve with steroids - Can trial if only minor scarring - Circumcision usually necessary BXO BALANITIS / POSTHITIS BALANITIS: INFECTIVE BALANITIS: INFECTIVE Organisms: - streptococcus most common - fungal - STI’s: Herpes, syphilis, gonorrhoea Treatment: - swab; especially if there is pus - antifungal or antibiotic; ?both - may be difficult to distinguish from non-infective causes so can consider steroid as well
    [Show full text]
  • Neonatal and Child Male Circumcision: a Global Review UNAIDS/10.07E – JC1672E (English Original, April 2010)
    Neonatal and child male circumcision: a global review UNAIDS/10.07E – JC1672E (English original, April 2010) © Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) 2010. All rights reserved. Publications produced by UNAIDS can be obtained from the UNAIDS Content Management Team. Requests for permission to reproduce or translate UNAIDS publications—whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution— should also be addressed to the Content Management Team at the address below, or by fax, at +41 22 791 4835, or e-mail: [email protected]. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNAIDS concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by UNAIDS in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. All reasonable precautions have been taken by UNAIDS to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall UNAIDS be liable for damages arising from its use. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Neonatal and child male circumcision: a global review. «UNAIDS/10.07E». 1.Circumcision, Male - utilization.
    [Show full text]
  • Circumcision: Is It the Right Thing to Do for Your Baby? Mckenzie Pediatrics, P.C
    Circumcision: Is It The Right Thing To Do For Your Baby? McKenzie Pediatrics, P.C. July 2011 Male circumcision is a surgical procedure in which some or all of the skin covering the end of the penis is removed. Considerable controversy surrounds the procedure, especially in regards to its performance in the neonatal period. There is much information to overwhelm the already stressed new parent who is trying to make an informed decision about whether to take off this small piece of skin, or leave it. This handout aims to aid in that decision. What Is Circumcision? At birth, boys have skin that covers the end of the penis, called the foreskin, or prepuce. Circumcision surgically removes the foreskin, exposing the tip (glans) of the penis. The procedure is usually performed by a doctor, in the first few weeks of life. An infant must be healthy and stable to safely be circumcised. Why Do Parents Choose To Circumcise Their Newborn Sons? Parents may want their sons circumcised for religious, social, or cultural reasons. Some groups, such as followers of the Jewish and Islamic faiths, practice circumcision for religious reasons. Other parents choose to have their sons circumcised because “all the other men in the family were circumcised”, or out of concerns about the attitudes of peers and their sons’ self concept in the future. In recent decades, infant male circumcision has been declining. A growing number of American parents feel that circumcision is unnecessary, and are choosing not to have it done. The most recent year for which information is available is 2008, a year in which about half of newborn baby boys in the U.S.
    [Show full text]