September 11, 2019

TO: Members of the MAG Transportation Policy Committee

FROM: Mayor Jerry Weiers, Glendale, Chair

SUBJECT: MEETING NOTIFICATION AND TRANSMITTAL OF TENTATIVE AGENDA

Meeting - 11:30 a.m. (Note earlier starting time) Wednesday, September 18, 2019 MAG Office, Suite 200 - Saguaro Room 302 North 1st Avenue, Phoenix

A meeting of the Transportation Policy Committee is scheduled for the time and place noted above. Members of the Committee may attend the meeting either in person, by videoconference, or by telephone conference call. As determined at the first meeting of the Committee, proxies are not allowed. Members who are not able to attend the meeting are encouraged to submit their comments in writing, so that their view is always a part of the process.

For those attending in person, please park in the garage under the building. Bring your ticket to the meeting, parking will be validated. For those using transit, the Regional Public Transportation Authority will provide transit tickets for your trip. For those using bicycles, please lock your bicycle in the bike rack in the garage.

Pursuant to Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), MAG does not discriminate on the basis of disability in admission to or participation in its public meetings. Persons with a disability may request a reasonable accommodation, such as a sign language interpreter, by contacting Melissa Bettis at the MAG office. Requests should be made as early as possible to allow time to arrange the accommodation.

Refreshments and a light luncheon will be provided. If you have any questions, please contact Eric Anderson, MAG Executive Director, at (602) 254-6300.

c: MAG Regional Council MAG Management Committee Transportation Policy Committee TENTATIVE AGENDA September 18, 2019

1. Call to Order

2. Pledge of Allegiance

3. Call to the Audience

An opportunity will be provided to members of the public to address the Transportation Policy Committee on items that are not on the agenda that are within the jurisdiction of MAG, or on items on the agenda for discussion but not for action. Citizens will be requested not to exceed a three minute time period for their comments. A total of 15 minutes will be provided for the Call to the Audience agenda item, unless the Transportation Policy Committee requests an exception to this limit. Please note that those wishing to comment on agenda items posted for action will be provided the opportunity at the time the item is heard.

Action Requested: Information.

4. Approval of Consent Agenda

Council members may request that an item be removed from the consent agenda. Prior to action on the consent agenda, members of the audience will be provided an opportunity to comment on consent items. Consent items are marked with an asterisk (*).

Action Requested: Approval of the Consent Agenda.

Transportation Policy Committee – Tentative Agenda 1 September 18, 2019

ITEMS PROPOSED FOR CONSENT *

*4A. Approval of the August 14, 2019, Meeting Minutes

Action Requested: Approval of the August 14, 2019, meeting minutes.

*4B. Fiscal Year 2020 Freeway Life Cycle Program

The Freeway Life Cycle Program (FLCP) is the management tool for the implementation of freeway and highway projects funded through Proposition 400. On May 22, 2019, the MAG Regional Council approved Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 FLCP, contingent on a finding of air quality conformity. The FY 2020 FLCP included a deferral of $1.23 billion of projects and project scope items to bring the program into fiscal balance. The air quality conformity analysis has since been prepared and is included as a separate agenda item. This agenda item represents the formal approval of the FY 2020 FLCP and corresponding amendments to the FY 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program and 2040 Regional Transportation Plan. Please refer to the enclosed material.

Action Requested: Recommend approval of amendments and administrative modifications, as appropriate, to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program and 2040 MAG Regional Transportation Plan.

*4C. Fiscal Year 2020 Arterial Life Cycle Program Project Changes

The Arterial Life Cycle Program represents the financial management tool for the arterial component of the Regional Transportation Plan. On June 26, 2019, the MAG Regional Council approved the Fiscal Year 2020 Arterial Life Cycle Program. Since then, additional changes and modifications have been requested by member agencies. Please refer to the enclosed material.

Action Requested: Recommend approval of amendments and administrative modifications, as appropriate, to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program, 2020 Arterial Life Cycle Program, and 2040 MAG Regional Transportation Plan.

Transportation Policy Committee – Tentative Agenda 2 September 18, 2019

*4D. MAG Roadway Safety Program (RSP) Draft Policies and Procedures

The new MAG Roadway Safety Program (RSP) will be administered by MAG to supplement the state’s Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), and assist with providing additional funding in the short term. MAG will facilitate a Highway User Revenue Fund (HURF) transfer of funding for the regional safety program that can directly improve the safety conditions of our roadways in all areas of MAG, whether rural or dense urban. Starting in the fall of 2019, MAG will be issuing a call for project applications for transportation safety improvements, utilizing RSP funding in FY 2020 and 2021.

A working group made up of members of the MAG Transportation Safety Committee was convened to define the RSP evaluation procedures and programming guidelines. On August 27, 2019, the MAG Transportation Safety Committee unanimously voted to recommend approval of the RSP Draft Policies and Procedures document. It is anticipated that at the conclusion of the MAG Management Committee review and MAG Regional Council approval, a call for projects will be issued for RSP funding requests. Please refer to the enclosed material.

Action Requested: Recommend approval of the MAG Roadway Safety Program (RSP) Draft Policies and Procedures, and amendment of the MAG 2040 Regional Transportation Plan as appropriate.

*4E. Project Changes - Amendment and Administrative Modification to the FY 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program, FY 2019 Transit Program of Projects, and 2040 MAG Regional Transportation Plan

The Fiscal Year (FY) 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), and the 2040 MAG Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), were approved by the MAG Regional Council on June 28, 2017. The last modifications to the TIP, and RTP were approved at the August 28, 2019, MAG Regional Council meeting. The FY 2019 Transit Program of Projects (POP) was approved by MAG Regional Council on June 26, 2019. Since then, additional changes and modifications have been requested by member agencies. Please refer to the enclosed material.

Transportation Policy Committee – Tentative Agenda 3 September 18, 2019

Action Requested: Recommend approval of amendments and administrative modifications as appropriate to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), FY 2019 Transit Program of Projects, and 2040 MAG Regional Transportation Plan. Some projects may be contingent on a new finding of conformity.

ITEMS PROPOSED TO BE HEARD

5. Proposition 400 Extension: Financial Overview and Cost Assessment

Collections for Proposition 400 expire at the end of calendar year 2025. This agenda item represents the second of a series of policy discussions to inform enabling legislation for the extension of the transportation sales tax. A presentation of system expansion, operations and maintenance costs will be provided to illustrate the scale of potential multimodal transportation investments needed throughout the region. High-level information will also be presented on projected revenues. The presentation is intended to demonstrate the magnitude of needs, including maintenance and modernization, relative to projected revenues.

Action Requested: Information and discussion.

6. Request for Future Agenda Items

Topics or issues of interest that the Transportation Policy Committee would like to have considered for discussion at a future meeting will be requested.

Action Requested: Information.

7. Comments from the Committee

An opportunity will be provided for Transportation Policy Committee members to present a brief summary of current events. The Transportation Policy Committee is not allowed to propose, discuss, deliberate or take action at the

Transportation Policy Committee – Tentative Agenda 4 September 18, 2019

meeting on any matter in the summary, unless the specific matter is properly noticed for legal action.

Action Requested: Information.

Adjournment

Transportation Policy Committee – Tentative Agenda 5 September 18, 2019

MINUTES OF THE MARICOPA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TRANSPORTATION POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING August 14, 2019 MAG Office, Saguaro Room Phoenix, Arizona

MEMBERS ATTENDING Glendale, Mayor Jerry Weiers: Chair Mesa: Mayor John Giles Phoenix: Mayor Kate Gallego, Vice Chair Peoria: Councilmember Bridget #Avondale: Mayor Kenneth Weise Binsbacher Brookfield Residential: Brad Chelton Queen Creek: Mayor Gail Barney Buckeye: Mayor Jackie Meck Roc Arnett Consulting: Roc Arnett Chandler: Mayor Kevin Hartke Scottsdale: Councilmember Suzanne Klapp *Gila River Indian Community: Lt. State Transportation Board: Sam Elters Governor Robert Stone Sunland Asphalt: Doug DeClusin *Gilbert, Mayor Jenn Daniels Surprise: Mayor Skip Hall Goodyear: Mayor Georgia Lord Swift Transportation: Dave Berry Huellmantel and Affiliates: Charles #Tempe: Mayor Mark Mitchell Huellmantel Vulcan Materials Company: Mark #Maricopa: Mayor Christian Price Reardon #Maricopa County Board of Supervisors: Supervisor Clint Hickman

* Those members neither present nor represented by proxy. # Participated by telephone conference call.

1. Call to Order

A video on public input opportunities was played.

The meeting of the Transportation Policy Committee (TPC) was called to order by Chair Jerry Weiers, Glendale, at 11:30 a.m.

2. Pledge of Allegiance

The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.

Mayor Kate Gallego (who later joined the meeting in person), Supervisor Clint Hickman, Mayor Mark Mitchell, Mayor Christian Price and Mayor Kenneth Weise joined the meeting via teleconference. 1

Chair Weiers reminded committee members to turn on their microphones before they speak and to validate their parking stamps before leaving the meeting.

3. Call to the Audience

An opportunity was provided to members of the public to address the Transportation Policy Committee on items not scheduled on the agenda that fall under the jurisdiction of MAG, or on items on the agenda for discussion but not for action. Citizens will be requested not to exceed a three-minute period for their comments. A total of 15 minutes is provided for the Call to the Audience agenda item, unless the Transportation Policy Committee requests an exception to this limit. Those wishing to comment on agenda items posted for action will be provided the opportunity at the time the item is heard.

No comment cards were received.

4. Approval of Consent Agenda

Chair Weiers stated that agenda items #4A and #4B were on the Consent Agenda.

Chair Weiers noted that public comment is provided for consent items. No comment cards were received.

Chair Weiers asked members if they would like to remove or have a presentation on any of the Consent Agenda items. No requests were noted.

Mayor John Giles moved approval of the Consent Agenda items. Mr. Charles Huellmantel seconded, and the vote on the motion passed unanimously. Mayor Gallego, Supervisor Hickman, Mayor Mitchell, Mayor Price, and Mayor Weise voted in favor of the motion via teleconference.

4A. Approval of the June 19, 2019, Meeting Minutes

The Transportation Policy Committee, by consent, approved the June 19, 2019, meeting minutes.

4B. Project Changes - Amendment and Administrative Modification to the FY 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program, FY 2020 Draft Arterial Life Cycle Program, FY2019 Program of Projects, FY2020 working draft Program of Projects, and 2040 MAG Regional Transportation Plan

2 The Transportation Policy Committee, by consent, recommended approval of amendments and administrative modifications to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), FY 2020 draft Arterial Life Cycle Program, FY 2019 Transit Program of Projects, FY 2020 working draft Program of Projects, and 2040 MAG Regional Transportation Plan.

The Fiscal Year (FY) 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), and the 2040 MAG Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), were approved by the MAG Regional Council on June 28, 2017. The FY 2020 Arterial Life Cycle Program (ALCP) was approved by Regional Council on June 26, 2019. The last modifications to the TIP, RTP, and ALCP were approved at the June 26, 2019, MAG Regional Council meeting. Since then, additional changes and modifications have been requested by member agencies.

5. Proposition 400 Extension: Policy Framework

MAG Transportation Planning Program Manager Audra Koester Thomas gave the Committee an overview of the Proposition 400 extension policy framework. Ms. Thomas’ presentation kicked off many months of worth of work ahead associated with the extension of Proposition 400 and the development of the next Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). She told the Committee she would be joined by Transportation Economic and Finance Program Manager John Bullen to provide details into current and future policy elements that will be the focus of today’s conversation.

Ms. Thomas stated that staff has spent the last several months preparing for the policy conversations like today’s. The TPC had asked staff to look at key lessons learned from past efforts to deliver Proposition 300 and Proposition 400, as well as identify some of the successes of those efforts. She noted that Proposition 300 and 400 were fully programmed and projected funding toward specific projects. While specific projects provided certainty and commitment to long-range projects, the ability to deliver those specific projects relied on precise accuracy of projected revenues and costs, as well as the ability to foresee varying market conditions and specific investment needs for more than 20 years. She commented that knowing what the region will need in 2050 is an even bigger challenge, as the future of the next five years let alone 30 years from now is much less certain. The TPC has reflected that some of the funding decisions regarding our transportation programs can be hard to track because they differ by program, sometimes leading to confusion. MAG sees an opportunity to remedy that situation.

Ms. Thomas indicated that there are multiple local funding authorities for this region including Pinal County RTA, which is now included in MAG’s planning area but distinct from Maricopa County’s Proposition 400. Additionally, the rigidity of MAG’s statutorily codified allocations leave the agency with a lack of flexibility to revise or modify investment strategies, or the ability to respond to changing circumstances. This fastest-growing county still requires system

3 expansion needs but now also needs to consider modernization and preservation needs of the system it has already built. These challenges are compounded by a future that is less certain due to changing technologies and innovation.

Ms. Thomas added there is an opportunity to restore the Regional Transportation Plan to its original purpose as a long-range, vision-based plan. She commented that there also would be an opportunity to develop an investment program that manages specific investments, in addition to articulating how decisions are made and how projects are funded. This investment program would provide flexibility for regional policy makers to make the best decisions about regional investments. Ms. Thomas noted that many of our peer regions are using planning horizons of 2050.

Ms. Thomas reviewed the next five years, highlighting key milestones of: enabling legislation; development of Regional Transportation Plan; Air Quality Conformity; ballot placement; and tentative election date of November 2022. She noted that Proposition 400 collections expire December 31, 2025.

Ms. Thomas walked Committee members through the two-year planning process associated with the development of the next RTP. There are currently two open solicitations to assist MAG with technical expertise necessary for this process. This fall will conclude with the state of the practice and peer region analysis as well as the initiation of a visioning process that will pick up where the region left off with values mapping. She added that in 2020, MAG would be conducting an existing and future needs assessment that would include conversations around federally-required performance targets; development of an evaluative framework; and revenue forecasts. Ultimately, MAG’s intent is to then use scenario planning to help identify the best and most resilient transportation investments that will best serve and be able to respond to a variety of futures. Into 2021, MAG will develop what the best transportation investment strategies are toward developing two important documents: the long-range vision of a Regional Transportation Plan and a specific investment program or detailed investment strategy. Ms. Thomas indicated that MAG is in an air quality containment area and the RTP must go through a federal process to ensure air quality conformity.

Ms. Thomas indicated that success during the next legislative session will allow MAG to ask the Board of Supervisors for placement on the county ballot in the spring of 2022. By October or November this year, MAG will be asking the TPC to come to concurrence around what it will be asking of the legislature. She reviewed the statutory authority differences between all other Arizona counties and Maricopa County. All other counties permit the Board of Supervisors to place the county initiative on the ballot; have flexibility for the planning process to identify the range of transportation needs; and have the authority to ask voters for up to a one cent sales tax. In Maricopa County, the legislature directed the Board of Supervisors to place the initiative for Proposition 400 on the ballot; three “firewalled” allocations mandate how half-cent sales tax proceeds are used (56.2 percent for freeways, 33.3 percent for transit,

4 and 10.5 percent for arterials); and the authority is only up to a half-cent.

Ms. Thomas reiterated that today’s focus is on the policy and funding framework MAG believes will allow for the flexibility necessary for a plan that extends to 2050. In September, staff will present on the magnitude of cost associated with maintenance and operation of our system for the next 30 years, in addition to the known capital investments. This will provide members of the TPC with the size, scope, and scale of the needs facing the region.

In October, there will be a summary overview, and concurrence on framework for legislative and governing programs to build legislation around. Listening sessions for legislators, member agency management and technical staff, elected officials, as well as members of the business community will continue through much of September. She noted the listening sessions with legislators were focused on gaining insight into Pima County’s recent success during the last session where they received enabling legislation for the County Board of Supervisors to call an election and for authority for up to a full cent.

Ms. Thomas advised that draft legislation would be based on direction from the TPC and Regional Council. MAG plans to hold a Transportation Summit in December based on the success of last year’s Sun Corridor Transportation Summit. This year’s summit will bring together legislators, mayors, and the business community and build momentum going into the next legislative session.

MAG Executive Director Eric Anderson provided context relative to the Proposition 400 process. Mr. Anderson stated the process began in July 2000 and launched with a number of technical studies. He added this time around, staff has jumpstarted the process since the technical studies are already underway. Mr. Anderson stressed the importance of the scenario planning process and noted that various planning scenarios were used in crafting Proposition 400 and different investments across freeways, streets and transit and informed policymakers in terms of the level of investment needed. He added that this current effort will focus on the uncertainty of changing technology our region will face in the future. MAG has updated models to be able to handle those types of policy questions. Mr. Anderson said that planners learned a lot going through Proposition 400 and have incorporated these lessons learned into a new, more refined process for an extension.

Mayor Kevin Hartke asked if there was a date set for the Transportation Summit. Ms. Thomas answered that MAG plans to hold the Transportation Summit in early December but an exact date has not yet been set. She added that notification would be sent to members once a date is selected.

Mr. Bullen began his portion of the presentation on funding policy. He noted he would provide a broad overview of the current system, challenges today and into the future, and a new framework to enable the flexibility and decision making needed in the future. Mr. Bullen stated

5 that planning for Proposition 400 began in earnest in July 2000. In November 2003, the MAG Regional Council approved the Regional Transportation Plan. In February 2004, Governor Janet Napolitano signed enabling legislation into law and the initiative was placed on the county ballot in November 2004 and passed successfully.

Mr. Anderson added that Proposition 400 came after Proposition 300 which was made up entirely of new freeway construction. He mentioned there was a lot of uncertainty with Proposition 400 because it was the first time a regional tax was proposed that covered multi- modal transportation investments. He noted that because of this, the legislature wanted to see how the funds would be used.

Mr. Bullen stated that the 2003 Regional Transportation Plan, which articulated specific investment choices and projects, ultimately became the proposition 400 program. Out of Proposition 400 came three major modal programs: the freeway program; transit program; and arterial program. These programs were largely defined by a 20-year list of projects and were managed through a life-cycle concept where projected expenditures could not exceed available revenues into the program over the life of the sales tax. Another attribute of these programs is that they have statutory requirements with language that guides their implementation.

Mr. Bullen indicated that there were a number of other programs included as part of Proposition 400 including paving of unpaved roads, active transportation, transportation studies, street sweepers, and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), which totaled $0.267 billion over 20-years. These programs are different in that projects are selected through a periodic call-for-projects process, by which agencies submit applications every one-to-three years, with competitive selection based on evaluative criteria.

Mr. Bullen stated that the original Proposition 400 half-cent sales tax collections totaled $9 billion in 2002 purchasing power. However, the 2003 Regional Transportation Plan also included other revenue sources. The 2003 Regional Transportation Plan included the sales tax (53.8 percent of total revenues); ADOT highway funds (26.1 percent of total revenues); federal transit (12 percent of total revenues); and MAG federal funds (8.1 percent of total revenues). Mr. Bullen provided detail on each of the funding sources. He noted that the allocated split of sales tax revenue was first determined by the 2003 Regional Transportation Plan and later codified in State Statute as part of enabling legislation.

Mr. Anderson clarified that the dollar amounts shown in Mr. Bullen’s presentation are expressed in 2002 purchasing power and do not include future inflation. He added that if the sales tax numbers included inflation it would be in the $14 billion range.

Mr. Bullen moved on to discuss the second funding source included in the 2003 Regional Transportation Plan, ADOT Highway Funds. These are revenues available at a statewide level

6 and allocated to the MAG region based on State Statutes and the ADOT five-year construction program. The ADOT funds are comprised of two sources: ADOT federal funds and gas tax funds, known as Highway User Revenue Funds (HURF). Mr. Bullen noted that the third source was federal transit funds, which come from federal funding that is either allocated to the region based on formulas or to a specific project based on national competitive processes. The allocation of formula funds to MAG is set by federal transportation legislation and other factors. Mr. Bullen noted that the fourth source was MAG federal funds. MAG federal funds include federal highway funding allocated to MAG based on legislative formulas. These funds include Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) and Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBGP or STP).

Mr. Anderson stated CMAQ funds are used for MAG’s air quality programs such as paving of unpaved roads and active transportation projects. Funding for the STBGB program is allocated to MAG according to the federal transportation authorizing legislation and a majority of the funding is incorporated into the Arterial Life Cycle Program for street projects around the valley.

Mr. Bullen noted that in the 2003 Regional Transportation plan, 60 percent of the arterial program was funded through the sales tax and 40 percent through federal funds. The majority of the federal funds that go into that program are from the STBG program. He added that just about half of the funding for the freeway program came from the half-cent sales tax, with the other half coming from state and federal funding sources. For the transit program, about 55 percent of the funds came from the tax and approximately 45 percent came from federal sources. Mr. Bullen qualified that he is only talking about elements within the Proposition 400 program and 2003 Regional Transportation Plan; he stated that there are a number of local investments, particularly on the transit side, that are not captured in the numbers he displayed for the Committee.

Mr. Bullen next discussed challenges facing the program. MAG has learned a lot over the course of 35 years and there are some opportunities to improve. He added that generally, the existing system works well and the region has done a good job of delivering on planned investments. One of the challenges facing the region is the impact of new technology, including autonomous vehicles, transit service delivery model changes, introduction of micromobility options such as scooters and bike share programs as well as many other unknowns. Mr. Bullen commented that there also is uncertainty with revenue sources. A significant amount of revenues used for the transportation program comes from federal sources. The Federal Highway Trust Fund has seen dwindling revenues and has required general fund appropriations over the last few years to remain solvent. There is also an impact from the electrification of the auto fleet on state gas tax collections, which impacts revenues available to the freeway program. Additional revenue uncertainty comes from fluctuating economic cycles and changing federal priorities.

7 Mr. Bullen displayed a graphic of the original sales tax projections from 2003 relative to what has been collected to date and projected through 2025. He noted that when you look at revenue projections cumulatively over the 20-year life of the sales tax, the region has seen a 40 percent decrease in projected sales tax revenue, leading to tough decisions and project deferments outside the funding horizon.

Mr. Roc Arnett asked if the revenue projections slide was referring to all funds or just the half- cent sales tax. Mr. Bullen answered that it was just referring to the sales tax.

Mr. Anderson stated the original projects estimated close to $1.2 billion in half-cent sales tax revenues in 2025, the last year of the tax. The revised projection is just $625 million. Cumulatively, the region lost 40 percent of projected revenues over the 20-year life of the tax and the starting point for the extension is significantly lower than we thought it would be. He commented that this region lost 10 years of revenue growth during the Great Recession. It took the region until 2017 to get back to the 2007 revenue level. The reduction in revenues led to the rebalancing efforts.

Mr. Bullen next talked about challenges with growth in our region. He noted that an important distinction from the development of the last Regional Transportation Plan in 2003 was it only covered one county. Since then, the urbanized area has grown, and now includes areas outside of Maricopa County. As a result, the Regional Transportation Plan now must cover portions of two counties. Further, the latest projections for population growth have growth occurring not just in outlaying portions of the region, but also within established areas. That type of infill development requires different transportation solutions than we have had in the past.

Mr. Anderson added that MAG will continue to have a long range RTP. By federal law and regulation, the plan must cover the entire planning area that includes major portions of Pinal County. He noted that this requirement may lead to confusion as leaders go through the extension planning process. To clarify the process, MAG proposes decoupling the documents and making a clear Proposition 400 extension as well as a long-range transportation plan that includes the entire MAG planning area.

Mr. Barry asked if the Maricopa County tax would also support other counties. Mr. Anderson answered that the Maricopa County tax would be spent entirely in this county. He added that technically the tax could probably be spent in another county, but said he did not think that would work well politically. Mr. Anderson used State Route 24, currently under development in the East Valley, as an example. Mr. Anderson stated that when spending Proposition 400 sales tax money for the project, planners are careful to use it only in Maricopa County and not the Pinal County portion of the project.

Mr. Arnett asked about the Pinal County tax currently being challenged in court. Mr. Anderson stated that the Pinal County Regional Transportation Authority (RTA) ballot passed in 2017

8 was challenged in court and the tax court had problems with the way the ballot measure was listed. Litigation in that case is ongoing. He added that the tax is in place but the proceeds are going into an escrow account in Pinal County for the benefit of those transportation projects. The Pinal County RTA is managed by a separate RTA Board in that county and their activities have to be incorporated into the Transportation Improvement Program for MAG and the Sun Corridor MPO. The Pinal County RTA has responsibility for the sales tax in Pinal County.

Mr. Bullen indicated that MAG also sees challenges in program management. He commented there is awkwardness between Proposition 400 versus the Regional Transportation Plan. When the original RTP was adopted in 2003 and Proposition 400 was passed the following year, they were one in the same. The programs and projects have evolved so the management of the program is not as clean as it once was. Additionally, planners have found that it is difficult to predict 20 plus years’ worth of specific projects. There has been a recent trend of increasing project changes reflecting changing priorities, and that trend is expected to continue. He noted that this would only get more complicated by adding new programs into the extension.

Mayor Skip Hall asked Mr. Bullen to explain one of the graphics he used during his presentation regarding arterial project change requests. Mr. Bullen explained that the chart documented the number of project changes each year with the Arterial Life Cycle Program; the trend of increasing project changes reflects that the farther you move away from the original 2002-2003 project selection, priorities and needs of member agencies change at an increasing rate.

Mr. Bullen stated that as part of the extension, MAG sees an opportunity to make better investment decisions. Under Proposition 400, the half-cent sales tax is allocated toward the major modal programs, which are large programs with mostly projects that follow the federal process. The region funds small projects using federal funds, adding time and cost. He added that staff is currently working with a consultant to determine what that cost and time differential is when federalizing projects, but staff anticipates it will be at least 25 percent, depending on the size of the project. MAG plans to share the results of that study with the Committee in early 2020.

Mr. Anderson stated the lesson learned is that the region should use federal funds for large projects. The federal premium on a small project is substantial relative to the size of the project. On a larger project, those costs could be incorporated back into project more easily. He added that one of the strategies moving forward is to do a better job allocating federal funds to make them as cost effective as possible.

Mr. Bullen added there is another opportunity to introduce more comprehensive solutions using flexibility. He offered the I-10 Broadway Curve project as an example, noting it is the first major reconstruction project in this region. The $700 million project impacts approximately 300,000 vehicles per day as well as access to and from Sky Harbor International Airport. MAG

9 has been working diligently with ADOT and project partners to provide solutions to ease the impact on the driving public. Mr. Bullen remarked that planners would like to have the flexibility to deploy additional express busses to lessen the impact to the traveling public and to make improvements to local arterial roadways that would experience more use as travelers use these as alternative routes. Mr. Bullen explained that these innovative solutions are not possible because our current program does not provide the flexibility to invest in this innovative way.

Mr. Bullen indicated the MAG sees an opportunity to have a better funding policy framework. The current system is embedded within the Regional Transportation Plan and is complex. Staff has found that there are inconsistent processes throughout the three major Proposition 400 programs and the RTP lacks adequate documentation and transparency to track changes. MAG is proposing to decouple its funding policy from the RTP by placing the programmatic policy framework for the extension into a different document, and restoring the RTP back to its original intent. He stated that the Regional Transportation Plan is federally required and must outline the multimodal transportation system planned to facilitate the safe and efficient movement of people and goods throughout the region. Mr. Bullen noted that the RTP has a minimum 20-year horizon; must be updated at least every four years; is prepared with the engagement of public, stakeholders, and partners; and must be fiscally constrained. Mr. Bullen noted that a new requirement that was not in place for Proposition 400 is that the RTP must use performance-based planning to guide investments, as well as provide assurance that federally-supported investments are adequately operated and maintained.

Mr. Barry asked for an explanation of a performance-based plan. Ms. Thomas answered that there is guidance provided through federal statute on elements for which MAG must identify specific federal targets related to different investment strategies. MAG has the freedom to choose what some of those targets are and then the plan must to respond to what strategies the region is employing to make progress toward the performance targets. She used Transit Asset Management as an example, noting the region must articulate how the region will ensure proper maintenance of our federally-funded investments. While MAG began a performance program 20 years ago as part of the Proposition 400, a series of federal measures have been set to achieve national goals, and the region’s Regional Transportation Plan must outline how the agency intends to meet federal statutes and regulations to the variety of performance measures outlined.

Mr. Barry asked if MAG is building a 20 mile road and federal money is only used for one mile of that road, if the performance based requirements only apply to that one mile or the entire project. Ms. Thomas answered that if a project uses a variety of funding sources, it does not categorize different parts of a project as having come from specific funding sources, and federal performance-based requirements would apply to any project that uses federal funding.

Mr. Barry asked what it costs for the region to respond to the federal government. Ms. Thomas

10 stated there is no specific cost that can be calculated. She noted there are tradeoffs with what percentage of the region’s investments leaders want to target toward expansion versus preservation or modernization of the existing system. Ms. Thomas added that our region is still expanding and growing faster than any other county in the country. She noted that some of our region’s infrastructure has reached its useful life or soon will, and federal targets are intended to avoid tragedies that have occurred in other parts of the country where poorly maintained infrastructure has cost lives. The federal government has responded that if federal funding is used in a region for infrastructure, the region must respond with a plan for how to maintain the infrastructure. Ms. Thomas indicated that at September’s TPC meeting, staff would provide a report on the size and scale of the maintenance needs over the course of the next 30 years. This will not be an itemized, specific list of costs, but will speak to how the region will need to weigh tradeoffs between system expansion versus system preservation. She stated staff would look to the TPC’s input on these tradeoffs.

Mr. Anderson added that the federal performance standards make sense when it comes to safety and congestion levels. The federal government wants to make sure that metropolitan planning organizations like MAG are responding to the full range of needs and not putting all of our money into capacity building and letting the current system deteriorate beyond repair. He commented that when Proposition 400 was done in 2003, safety was not a consideration. MAG now has a range of safety performance measures and stated he believes that safety will be one of the cornerstones in the extension.

Mr. Bullen stated MAG is proposing taking its funding policy out of the RTP and restoring that plan to its original intent and focus as a long-range, visionary plan. MAG would then create a new funding policy document to manage funding policy in the region. The current working name for this document is the Maricopa County Strategic Investment Program. Proposed funding policy model objectives include documenting available resources and revenues; articulating regional goals and priorities; allocating funding in accordance to these priorities; setting policies to manage changes and implementation; and ensuring consistency and transparency.

Councilmember Bridget Binsbacher said she would like to have a clear understanding of the role the TPC will have moving forward. She added that members of the TPC will need to come to a point that they can speak with one voice to make the request of the legislature. She noted that in order to do that effectively it is important that members of the TPC are able to bring in staff and subject matter experts to work with them to make the best possible decisions.

Mr. Anderson stated that in September, staff will be talking about the needs of the region’s transportation system and in October and November, they will get into the bulk of the policy discussions and will be responsive to member questions. He added that staff is also working on roles and responsibilities of the different entities including the TPC, Regional Council and others. There will be a meeting next Monday to discuss how the Management Committee

11 could help support activities of the TPC and Regional Council. Mr. Anderson commented that staff is giving in depth presentations to the TPC that are not possible to have during a typical Management Committee meeting.

Mr. Bullen stated that with the new funding model there is discussion about the mechanism by which the region creates future programs. There will be a two-year planning process to define what those programs are that will begin this winter. Staff envisions this new funding policy document will retain those policy decisions. If leaders identify 10 different programs, they will all be articulated in the funding document and the distribution of funds to each of those programs will be identified.

Mr. Bullen indicated that moving forward, staff is confident that they will not be able to predict the future and that the region will need a framework that can respond to changes and will allow for leaders to make changes based on shifting conditions. He added that the proposed funding policy model will improve the current process by simplifying it, making it transparent and making it flexible.

Mayor Skip Hall asked if staff is looking at autonomous vehicles and what other cities are doing across the nation. Mr. Anderson answered that MAG has fairly extensive connections at the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), and Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations (AMPO), and MAG is participating in some of the FHWA’s expert panels on autonomous vehicles. He reiterated that MAG has tuned-up its transportation modeling tools which now used as models for the rest of the country to learn how to simulate some of the impacts of autonomous vehicles and technology. There is a lot happening in this space and a lot of uncertainty. Mr. Anderson commented that experts now believe fully autonomous vehicles will be rolled out slower than previously thought just a few years ago because of issues related to human behavior. Some of the technology gained from autonomous vehicles are having tremendous safety benefits in vehicles currently on our roads. He noted that MAG put together a chart that has 16 different areas that are impacted by autonomous vehicles and how the region should respond to those areas. Mr. Anderson said that planners understand the issues but do not yet know the answers.

Mr. Anderson advised that there will not be enough money to do everything. He stated that revenue projections for the sales tax extension are not complete but are projected to be approximately $13 to $15 billion, which will go very quickly. Mr. Anderson said there would be some interesting policy discussions over the next couple of years. Some of the considerations include commuter rail, which is a $2 to $3 billion dollar package, not all of which would have to be sales tax money; there are transit deserts, or areas in the Valley where there is no transit service, that need to be fixed; there is demand for high capacity transit routes; and there is a need to continue to expand capacity on our streets. He added that the gas tax has not increased since October 1990, leaving the region short of additional money for these projects and improvements. Mr. Anderson commented that the role of the TPC will be sorting

12 through some of these options and evaluating tradeoffs.

Councilmember Suzanne Klapp asked if staff was implying that the way the TPC would set policy in the future will not divide up the work into highways, arterials and transit, but instead by programs. Mr. Bullen answered that Councilmember Klapp was correct. He added there are currently three programs and staff anticipates that number will grow.

Mayor Hartke asked for clarification on if the TPC and Executive Committee would be selecting those programs and deciding on priorities. Mr. Bullen stated that ultimately policymakers will determine what those programs are.

Mayor Giles stated that it is great to have Mr. Anderson available to the Committee to talk about what happened in 2003 with Proposition 400 and lessons learned. He walked through what MAG’s experience was dealing with the legislature for Proposition 400 when they set firewalls, help to determine what went on the ballot, and wanted to review the Regional Transportation Plan. Mayor Giles said he understands that MAG will begin working with the legislature later this year and will hold a Transportation Summit. He commented he thinks it is incumbent upon members of the Committee to sit at the legislature with the legislators and exert local leadership to best inform them of the intent of the legislation. Mayor Giles asked about strategy and timing and going to the legislature without a finished plan. Mr. Anderson stated the underlying strategy staff is proposing is that MAG go to the legislature for authorization without a plan. He added there is risk in that strategy and members of the legislature may say a plan is required to move forward and if that happened, MAG would go to Plan B. This is one reason MAG is holding listening sessions with key legislators talking about the bill led by Pima County that gave the ability to 14 other Arizona counties to go to a full cent without a plan and about what MAG intends to do.

Mr. Anderson also noted that MAG is relying on the extension being a renewal of a multimodal tax already in place. MAG has 35 years of experience and has a good track record and credibility with some members of the legislature. He indicated the other major element is flexibility and said MAG has heard from many member agencies as well as key legislators that the region needs more flexibility moving into the future to handle changing technology and future needs. In addition, MAG will rely on the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors to put this measure on the ballot. MAG would like permissive authority for the Board of Supervisors this time and wants to make sure the Board of Supervisors supports this process. Mr. Anderson stated the Board gave MAG unanimous support when Proposition 400 was put on the ballot. He added that the Board is seen as a conservative body and MAG is relying on the Board to be the gatekeeper on the ballot as opposed to the legislature. Mr. Anderson said that the decision should be a local one and legislators from Apache County should not be deciding whether Maricopa County should have a ballot question.

Councilmember Binsbacher raised concern about flexibility and what role the TPC will have in

13 determining what the process is to manage a flexible plan. She said there are risks in going to the legislature without a plan.

Mayor Barney asked if all federal funding is allocated to the program. Mr. Anderson answered that there are different federal programs and more than 30 percent of Proposition 400 funding is federal money. He mentioned that there was some discussion about raising the federal gas tax but that did not happen.

Mr. Barry said that when Proposition 400 was passed there was a different environment and it was a major undertaking for MAG to get through the legislature. He stated that in the ensuing years, trust was earned which is a great accomplishment. Mr. Barry indicated that MAG should have an easier time getting the extension through the legislature.

6. Request for Future Agenda Items

Topics or issues of interest that the Transportation Policy Committee would like to have considered for discussion at a future meeting were requested.

No requests were noted.

7. Comments from the Committee

An opportunity was provided for Transportation Policy Committee members to present a brief summary of current events. The Transportation Policy Committee is not allowed to propose, discuss, deliberate or take action at the meeting on any matter in the summary, unless the specific matter is properly noticed for legal action.

Chair Weiers advised that the meeting should begin on time even if he is running late.

Adjournment

There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 12:55 p.m.

Chair

Secretary

14

Transportation Policy Committee INFORMATION SUMMARY

AGENDA ITEM # 4B

DATE September 11, 2019

SUBJECT Fiscal Year 2020 Freeway Life Cycle Program

CONTACT John Bullen, Transportation Economic and Finance Program Manager, (602) 254-6300.

SUMMARY The Freeway Life Cycle Program (FLCP) is the management tool for the implementation of freeway and highway projects identified in the MAG Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). State statutes require that estimated costs do not exceed the amount of forecasted program revenues. On May 22, 2019, the MAG Regional Council approved the rebalanced Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 FLCP contingent on a finding of air quality conformity. The air quality conformity analysis has since been prepared and is included as a separate agenda item. This agenda item represents the formal approval of the FY 2020 FLCP and corresponding amendments to the FY 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program and 2040 Regional Transportation Plan.

Since the MAG Regional Council approved the program on May 22, 2019, an annual inflationary increase has been applied to project budgets. Specifically, an increase of 2.99 percent was applied to all projects except those where the FLCP programmed amount represented a fixed financial contribution (such as the I-17, Anthem Way to Yavapai

1 County Line project). The annual inflationary increase had previously been factored into the program’s cash flow model and does not adversely impact the program’s cash flow. Other changes to the program included as part of this agenda item are:

• Increased right of way funding for the I-10/Fairway Drive project. The TIP amendments include an additional $967,120 for right of way acquisition on the project. A parcel that the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) had originally intended would be a partial acquisition now requires a full acquisition. Once the project is completed, ADOT will sell the remnant portion of the parcel. The additional funding will come from the regionwide advance acquisition sub- program and will not adversely impact the program’s cash flow.

• Increased construction funding for the I-17, Peoria Avenue to Greenway Road drainage project. The TIP amendments include an additional $2,773,689 for construction activities of the project. Bids for the I-17, Peoria Avenue to Greenway Road drainage project were opened on July 19, 2019 and the low-bid was higher than the programmed amount, primarily driven by an increase in manhole costs. The additional funding will come from the fund balance and will not significantly impact the program’s cash flow.

• Schedule changes to the SR-303L, Happy Valley Road to Lake Pleasant Parkway project. The rebalanced program included deferral of the project’s construction phase to the first quarter of FY 2021 to align with local roadway improvement work (City of Peoria). The schedule has since been revised to keep construction in FY 2020 (third quarter) and is reflected in the TIP amendments.

The TIP amendments are reflected in the enclosed table (Table 1). A new publication that reflects the FY 2020 FLCP will be available following the program’s approval by the MAG Regional Council.

PUBLIC INPUT None.

2 PROS & CONS PROS: State statutes require that estimated project costs in the Freeway Life Cycle Program (FLCP) do not exceed the amount of forecasted revenues. The MAG Regional Council approved the rebalanced Fiscal Year 2020 on May 22, 2019 contingent on a finding of quality conformity. This agenda item represents additional amendments and formal approval of the program.

CONS: None.

TECHNICAL & POLICY IMPLICATIONS TECHNICAL: The Fiscal Year 2020 Freeway Life Cycle Program establishes project budgets and schedules for regional freeway and highway investments through the end of Proposition 400. POLICY: A.R.S. 28-6352 (A) requires that a budgeting process is in place to ensure that estimated costs do not exceed the amount of total revenues estimated to be available.

ACTION NEEDED Recommend approval of amendments and administrative modifications, as appropriate, to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program and 2040 MAG Regional Transportation Plan.

PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS On September 11, 2019, the MAG Management Committee recommended approval of amendments and administrative modifications, as appropriate, to the FY 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program and 2040 MAG Regional Transportation Plan.

MEMBERS ATTENDING

Queen Creek: John Kross, Chair Litchfield Park: Bill Stephens Goodyear: Julie Arendall, Vice Chair *City of Maricopa: Rick Horst ADOT: Eric Gudino as proxy for Maricopa County: Reid Spaulding as John Halikowski proxy for Joy Rich Apache Junction: Bryant Powell Mesa: Christopher Brady Avondale: Gina Montes as proxy for Paradise Valley: Jill Keimach Charles Montoya Peoria: Thomas Adkins as proxy for

3 Buckeye: Roger Klingler Jeff Tyne *Carefree: Gary Neiss Phoenix: Ed Zuercher *Cave Creek: Carrie Dyrek Pinal County: Himanshu Patel as Chandler: Marsha Reed proxy for Greg Stanley El Mirage: Crystal Dyches *Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian *Florence: Brent Billingsley Community: Bryan Meyers *Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation: *Scottsdale: Jim Thompson Phil Dorchester Surprise: Mark Schott as proxy for #Fountain Hills: David Trimble as Mike Frazier proxy for Grady Miller Tempe: Marge Zylla as proxy for #Gila Bend: Kathy Valenzuela Andrew Ching *Gila River Indian Community: Tolleson: Reyes Medrano, Jr. Kathyleen Curley Valley Metro/RPTA: Alexis Kinsey as Gilbert: Rene Guillen as proxy for proxy for Scott Smith Patrick Banger Wickenburg: Vince Lorefice Glendale: Ryan Lee as proxy for Kevin Youngtown: Jeanne Blackman Phelps #Guadalupe: Jeff Kulaga

* Those members neither present nor represented by proxy.

# Participated by telephone conference call.

On May 22, 2019, the MAG Regional Council approved the Draft Fiscal Year 2020 Freeway Life Cycle Program, contingent on a finding of air quality conformity, with recognition that previously authorized corridors that have not been constructed, such as State Route 30, should have priority consideration for the use of the proposed extension of 400 funding.

4 MEMBERS ATTENDING

Vice Mayor Robin Benning as proxy #Litchfield Park: Mayor Thomas for Mayor Gail Barney, Queen Creek, Schoaf Chair *City of Maricopa: Mayor Christian Tempe: Mayor Mark Mitchell, Vice Price Chair Maricopa County: Supervisor Steve Apache Junction: Councilmember Chucri Robin Barker Mesa: Mayor John Giles #Avondale: Mayor Kenneth Weise *Paradise Valley: Mayor Jerry Bien- Buckeye: Mayor Jackie Meck Willner Carefree: Mayor Les Peterson Peoria: Mayor Cathy Carlat Cave Creek: Councilmember David Phoenix: Mayor Kate Gallego L. Smith Pinal County: Supervisor Todd House Chandler: Mayor Kevin Hartke #Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian El Mirage: Mayor Alexis Hermosillo Community: President Martin *Florence: Mayor Tara Walter Havier *Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation: Scottsdale: Mayor W.J. “Jim” Lane President Bernadine Burnette #Surprise: Mayor Skip Hall #Fountain Hills: Mayor Ginny Dickey #Tolleson: Mayor Anna Tovar #Gila Bend: Mayor Tommy Lee Sikes *Wickenburg: Mayor Everett Sickles *Gila River Indian Community: #Youngtown: Mayor Michael LeVault Governor Stephen Roe Lewis State Transportation Board: Mr. Gilbert: Mayor Jenn Daniels Sam Elters Glendale: Mayor Jerry Weiers State Transportation Board: Mr. Jack Goodyear: Mayor Georgia Lord Sellers *Guadalupe: Mayor Valerie Molina * Those members neither present nor represented by proxy. # Attended by telephone conference call. + Attended by videoconference

5 TABLE 1: Requested Freeway Life Cycle Program Project Changes to the FY 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and 2040 Regional Transportation Plan1, TIP AMENDMENT #24

Sort: Section, Agency, Location, Work Year

Through Performance Categories Lanes PM1 PM2T PM2N PM2B PM3F PM3S PM3E Federal Functional Classificatio Fed ID / TRACS / Work Funding Apport. 4 3

Agency Section MAG ID Location n MAG Mode Estimate Date for Completion/ to Open Traffic: MM/YY AQ Area Program In Miles Before After Safety Transit Asset Condition Pavement Condition Bridge Condition Travel Reliability Non SOV Travel CMAQ Emissions TIP ID Grant ID ALI Work Year Type Year Federal Regional Local Total TIP Change Request Principal 10 (Papago): SR85 - Amend: New TIP Listing. Increase project ADOT Highway 85213 Arterial - Freeway APR-JUN 2022 Maricopa FLCP 7 4 6 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No DOT20-859 Design widening 2020 RARF 2020 - 3,316,278 - 3,316,278 Verrado Way design phase. Interstate Principal 10 (Papago): SR85 - Right of way and utilities for ADOT Highway 85213 Arterial - Freeway APR-JUN 2022 Maricopa FLCP 7 4 6 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No DOT18-820 2019 RARF 2019 - 6,100,000 - 6,100,000 Amend: Reduce project right of way phase. Verrado Way widening Interstate Principal 10 (Papago): SR85 - ADOT Highway 85213 Arterial - Freeway APR-JUN 2022 Maricopa FLCP 7 4 6 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No DOT19-823 Construct widening 2020 NHPP 2020 41,906,000 25,809,925 - 67,715,925 Amend: Increase project construction phase. Verrado Way Interstate Principal 10 (Papago): SR85 - ADOT Highway 85213 Arterial - Freeway APR-JUN 2022 Maricopa FLCP 7 4 6 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No DOT19-823C2 Construct widening 2020 NHFP 2020 33,000,000 3,046,500 - 36,046,500 Amend: Increase project construction phase. Verrado Way Interstate 10 (Papago): Principal Right of Way and Utilities Amend: New TIP listing. Increase project right of ADOT Highway 35521 Fairway Dr (El Arterial - Freeway OCT-DEC 2019 Maricopa FLCP ------No No No No Yes No No DOT20-860 2020 RARF 2020 - 967,120 - 967,120 for Traffic Interchange way phase from DOT20-715. Mirage Rd) TI Interstate Principal Amend: Decrease amount, transfer to DOT20- ADOT Highway 30990 MAG Regionwide Arterial - Freeway -- Maricopa FLCP ------No No No No Yes No No DOT20-715 R/W Advance Acquisition 2020 RARF 2020 - 532,880 - 532,880 860. Interstate 10 (Maricopa): Sky Principal Pre-design and ADOT Highway 45051 Harbor West Airport Arterial - Freeway APR-JUN 2026 Maricopa FLCP ------No No No No Yes No No DOT19-806 environmental for airport 2021 RARF 2021 - 2,500,000 - 2,500,000 Amend: Defer work year from 2020 to 2021. Access Interstate access improvements 10 (Maricopa): Sky Principal Construct airport access ADOT Highway 45051 Harbor West Airport Arterial - Freeway APR-JUN 2026 Maricopa FLCP ------No No No No Yes No No DOT15-171 2024 NHPP 2024 68,000,000 17,000,000 - 85,000,000 Amend: Change funding source. improvements Access Interstate 10 (Maricopa): I-17 Split - SR-202L Principal Pre-design freeway Amend: New TIP Listing. Increase project pre- ADOT Highway 40575 Santan (Near-Term Arterial - Freeway APR-JUN 2024 Maricopa FLCP 11 8 10 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No DOT20-861 2020 NHPP 2020 12,000,000 4,478,400 - 16,478,400 improvements design phase. Improvement Interstate Strategy) 10 (Maricopa): I-17 Split - SR-202L Principal Design-build procurement Amend: New TIP Listing. Increase project ADOT Highway 40575 Santan (Near-Term Arterial - Freeway APR-JUN 2024 Maricopa FLCP 11 8 10 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No DOT20-862 2020 NHPP 2020 17,000,000 8,335,540 - 25,335,540 for freeway improvements design phase. Improvement Interstate Strategy) 10 (Maricopa): I-17 Split - SR-202L Principal Right-of-way for freeway ADOT Highway 40575 Santan (Near-Term Arterial - Freeway APR-JUN 2024 Maricopa FLCP 11 8 10 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No DOT20-831 2020 RARF 2020 - 39,527,562 - 39,527,562 Amend: Increase project right of way phase. improvements Improvement Interstate Strategy) 10 (Maricopa): I-17 Split - SR-202L Principal Design-build freeway Amend: Increase project design-build phase. ADOT Highway 40575 Santan (Near-Term Arterial - Freeway APR-JUN 2024 Maricopa FLCP 11 8 10 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No DOT21-820 2021 NHPP 2021 114,744,000 129,579,177 - 244,323,177 improvements Split funding over two years. Improvement Interstate Strategy) 10 (Maricopa): I-17 Split - SR-202L Principal Amend: New TIP listing. Increase project Design-build freeway ADOT Highway 40575 Santan (Near-Term Arterial - Freeway APR-JUN 2024 Maricopa FLCP 11 8 10 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No DOT20-838 2022 NHPP 2022 182,852,000 136,180,123 - 319,032,123 design-build phase. Split funding over two improvements Improvement Interstate years. Strategy) Amend: New TIP Listing. Remove the I- 10 (Maricopa): Principal 10/Highline North Pedestrian Bridge from the 10 ADOT Highway 6987 Highline North Arterial - Freeway OCT-DEC 2027 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No No Yes No No -- Design pedestrian bridge 2026 RARF 2026 - 1,029,900 - 1,029,900 (Maricopa): I-17 Split - SR-202L Santan (Near- Pedestrian Bridge Interstate Term Improvement Strategy) project Amend: New Listing. Remove the I-10/Highline 10 (Maricopa): Principal Construct pedestrian North Pedestrian Bridge from the 10 (Maricopa): ADOT Highway 6987 Highline North Arterial - Freeway OCT-DEC 2027 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No No Yes No No -- 2027 RARF 2027 - 10,299,000 - 10,299,000 bridge I-17 Split - SR-202L Santan (Near-Term Pedestrian Bridge Interstate Improvement Strategy) project 10 (Maricopa): Principal Amend: Clarify project work description. ADOT Highway 60858 SR202L Santan - Arterial - Freeway JAN-MAR 2027 Maricopa FLCP 6 4 8 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No DOT07-637 Design freeway widening 2021 RARF 2021 - 11,143,518 - 11,143,518 Increase project design phase. Riggs Rd Interstate

Page 1 of 9 Date Printed 9/3/2019 TABLE 1: Requested Freeway Life Cycle Program Project Changes to the FY 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and 2040 Regional Transportation Plan1, TIP AMENDMENT #24

Sort: Section, Agency, Location, Work Year

Through Performance Categories Lanes PM1 PM2T PM2N PM2B PM3F PM3S PM3E Federal Functional Classificatio Fed ID / TRACS / Work Funding Apport. 4 3

Agency Section MAG ID Location n MAG Mode Estimate Date for Completion/ to Open Traffic: MM/YY AQ Area Program In Miles Before After Safety Transit Asset Condition Pavement Condition Bridge Condition Travel Reliability Non SOV Travel CMAQ Emissions TIP ID Grant ID ALI Work Year Type Year Federal Regional Local Total TIP Change Request 10 (Maricopa): Principal Acquisition of right of way Amend: New TIP listing. Add project right of way ADOT Highway 60858 SR202L Santan - Arterial - Freeway JAN-MAR 2027 Maricopa FLCP 6 4 8 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No DOT21-835 2021 RARF 2021 - 514,950 - 514,950 for freeway widening phase. Riggs Rd Interstate 10 (Maricopa): Principal Construct freeway Amend: Clarify project work description. ADOT Highway 60858 SR202L Santan - Arterial - Freeway JAN-MAR 2027 Maricopa FLCP 6 4 8 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No DOT09-698 2025 RARF 2025 - 115,513,584 - 115,513,584 widening Increase project construction phase. Riggs Rd Interstate 10 (Maricopa): Gila Principal Amend: Modify Project Name to accurately River Indian Construct access ADOT Highway 56320 Arterial - Freeway OCT-DEC 2023 Maricopa FLCP 0 4 4 No No No No Yes No No DOT22-820 2021 RARF 2021 - 15,000,000 - 15,000,000 reflect project description. Advance Work and Community Access improvements Interstate Apportionment Year from 2022 to 2021. Improvements Principal Amend: New TIP Listing. Defer project open 17: Central Ave Right-of-way for bridge ADOT Highway 18577 Arterial - Freeway OCT-DEC 2022 Maricopa FLCP 0 6 6 Yes No No Yes Yes No No DOT20-863 2020 RARF 2020 - 8,661,459 - 8,661,459 year from 2020 to 2022. Increase project right of Bridge (grade separation) Interstate way phase. Principal 17: Central Ave Construct bridge (grade Amend: Defer project open year from 2020 to ADOT Highway 18577 Arterial - Freeway OCT-DEC 2022 Maricopa FLCP 0 6 6 Yes No No Yes Yes No No DOT19-803 2020 RARF 2020 - 20,443,515 20,443,515 Bridge separation) 2022. Increase project construction phase. Interstate Principal Amend: Clarify work description from pre-design 17: I-10 Split - 19th Design freeway ADOT Highway 36077 Arterial - Freeway JUL-SEP 2027 Maricopa FLCP 3.5 6 6 Yes No Yes No Yes No No DOT18-809 2020 RARF 2020 - 6,694,350 - 6,694,350 to design. Clarify work type. Change number of Avenue improvements Interstate lanes after from 8 to 6. Amend: Advance work and apportionment year Principal 17: I-10 Split - 19th Right of way for freeway from 2022 to 2020. Reduce project right of way ADOT Highway 36077 Arterial - Freeway JUL-SEP 2027 Maricopa FLCP 3.5 6 6 Yes No Yes No Yes No No DOT22-802 2020 RARF 2020 - 4,119,600 - 4,119,600 Avenue improvements phase.. Clarify project type. Change number of Interstate lanes after from 8 to 6. Principal Amend: Add TIP ID. Reduce project 17: I-10 Split - 19th Construct freeway ADOT Highway 36077 Arterial - Freeway JUL-SEP 2027 Maricopa FLCP 3.5 6 6 Yes No Yes No Yes No No DOT24-001 2024 NHPP 2024 52,000,000 14,943,500 - 66,943,500 construction phase. Clarify project type. Change Avenue improvements Interstate number of lanes after from 8 to 6. Principal 17: I-10 Split - 19th ADOT Highway 36077 Arterial - Freeway JUL-SEP 2027 Maricopa FLCP 3.5 6 8 Yes No Yes No Yes No No DOT22-801 Design widening 2022 RARF 2022 - 13,000,000 - 13,000,000 Amend: Delete TIP Listing Avenue Interstate Principal 17: Indian School Right of way and utilities Amend: New TIP listing. Increase project right of ADOT Highway 30916 Arterial - Freeway APR-JUN 2023 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No Yes Yes No No DOT20-864 2020 RARF 2020 - 4,984,716 - 4,984,716 Road TI for traffic interchange way and utility phase. Interstate Principal 17: Indian School ADOT Highway 30916 Arterial - Freeway APR-JUN 2023 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No Yes Yes No No DOT20-832 Construct traffic interchange 2021 NHPP 2021 35,000,000 11,057,128 - 46,057,128 Amend: Decrease project construction phase. Road TI Interstate Principal Amend: Defer open to traffic year from 2024 to ADOT Highway 17481 17: Camelback Rd TI Arterial - Freeway OCT-DEC 2025 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No No Yes No No DOT19-808 Design traffic interchange 2022 RARF 2022 - 5,551,161 - 5,551,161 2025. Defer work and apportionment year from Interstate 2021 to 2022. Decrease design phase.

Principal Amend: Defer open to traffic year from 2024 to Right of way for traffic ADOT Highway 17481 17: Camelback Rd TI Arterial - Freeway OCT-DEC 2025 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No No Yes No No DOT19-809 2022 NHPP 2022 15,000,000 5,010,957 - 20,010,957 2025. Defer work and apportionment year from interchange Interstate 2021 to 2022. Increase right of way phase.

Principal Amend: Defer open to traffic year from 2024 to ADOT Highway 17481 17: Camelback Rd TI Arterial - Freeway OCT-DEC 2025 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No No Yes No No DOT21-806 Construct traffic interchange 2024 NHPP 2024 44,720,000 12,851,410 - 57,571,410 2025. Defer work and apportionment year from Interstate 2023 to 2024. Increase construction phase.

Principal Amend: Defer open to traffic from 2027 to 2030. Pre-design traffic RARF- ADOT Highway 42844 17: Glendale Ave TI Arterial - Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No No Yes No No DOT21-822 2027 2027 - 1,019,601 - 1,019,601 Defer work and apportionment Year from 2021 interchange improvements HURF Interstate to 2027. Decrease pre-design phase. Principal Amend: Defer open to traffic from 2027 to Design traffic interchange RARF- ADOT Highway 42844 17: Glendale Ave TI Arterial - Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No No Yes No No -- 2028 2028 - 4,201,992 - 4,201,992 2030. Defer work and apportionment Year from improvements HURF Interstate 2023 to 2028. Decrease design phase. Amend: Defer open to traffic year from 2027 to Principal Right of way and utilities for RARF- 2030. Defer work and apportionment Year from Ach Highway 42844 17: Glendale Ave TI Arterial - Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No No Yes No No -- traffic interchange 2028 2028 - 16,818,267 - 16,818,267 HURF 2023 to 2028. Increase project right of way and Interstate improvements utility phase.

Page 2 of 9 Date Printed 9/3/2019 TABLE 1: Requested Freeway Life Cycle Program Project Changes to the FY 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and 2040 Regional Transportation Plan1, TIP AMENDMENT #24

Sort: Section, Agency, Location, Work Year

Through Performance Categories Lanes PM1 PM2T PM2N PM2B PM3F PM3S PM3E Federal Functional Classificatio Fed ID / TRACS / Work Funding Apport. 4 3

Agency Section MAG ID Location n MAG Mode Estimate Date for Completion/ to Open Traffic: MM/YY AQ Area Program In Miles Before After Safety Transit Asset Condition Pavement Condition Bridge Condition Travel Reliability Non SOV Travel CMAQ Emissions TIP ID Grant ID ALI Work Year Type Year Federal Regional Local Total TIP Change Request Amend: Defer open to traffic year from 2027 to Principal Construct traffic interchange RARF- 2030. Defer work and apportionment Year from ADOT Highway 42844 17: Glendale Ave TI Arterial - Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No No Yes No No -- 2029 2029 - 43,502,976 - 43,502,976 improvements HURF 2025 to 2029. Decrease project construction Interstate phase. Principal Amend: Defer open to traffic date from 2027 to Pre-design traffic ADOT Highway 24087 17: Northern Ave TI Arterial - Freeway OCT-DEC 2029 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No Yes Yes No No DOT21-823 2025 RARF 2025 - 1,050,498 - 1,050,498 2029. Defer work and apportionment year from interchange improvements Interstate 2021 to 2025. Decrease pre-design phase. Amend: Defer open to traffic date from 2027 to Principal Design traffic interchange RARF- 2029. Defer work and apportionment year from ADOT Highway 24087 17: Northern Ave TI Arterial - Freeway OCT-DEC 2029 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No Yes Yes No No DOT22-830 2026 2026 - 4,593,354 - 4,593,354 improvements HURF 2022 to 2026. Decrease project design phase Interstate budget. Amend: Defer open to traffic date from 2027 to Principal Right of way and utilities for RARF- 2029. Defer work and apportionment year from ADOT Highway 24087 17: Northern Ave TI Arterial - Freeway OCT-DEC 2029 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No Yes Yes No No -- traffic interchange 2026 2026 - 21,401,322 - 21,401,322 HURF 2023 to 2026. increase project right of way and Interstate improvements utility phase. Amend: Defer open to traffic date from 2027 to Principal Construct traffic interchange RARF- 2029. Defer work and apportionment Year from ADOT Highway 24087 17: Northern Ave TI Arterial - Freeway OCT-DEC 2029 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No Yes Yes No No -- 2027 2027 - 47,643,174 - 47,643,174 improvements HURF 2025 to 2027. Decrease project construction Interstate phase. Principal 17: Peoria Ave - Construct drainage Amend: New TIP listing. Increase project ADOT Highway 30978 Arterial - Freeway 2020 OCT-DEC Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No Yes No Yes No No DOT20-865 2020 RARF 2020 2,773,689 2,773,689 Greenway Road improvements construction phase. Interstate Principal Amend: Defer open to traffic year from 2030 to 17: Thunderbird Pre-design traffic RARF- ADOT Highway 45077 Arterial - Freeway OCT-DEC 2032 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No Yes Yes No No DOT18-828 2028 2028 - 3,172,092 - 3,172,092 2032. Defer work and apportionment year from Road TI interchange improvements HURF Interstate 2024 to 2028. Decrease pre-design phase.

Principal Amend: Defer open to traffic year from 2030 to 17: Thunderbird Design traffic interchange RARF- ADOT Highway 45077 Arterial - Freeway OCT-DEC 2032 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No Yes Yes No No DOT19-826 2029 2029 - 8,764,449 - 8,764,449 2032. Defer work and apportionment year from Road TI improvements HURF Interstate 2025 to 2029. Decrease project design phase.

Principal Right of way and utilities for Amend: Defer open to traffic year from 2030 to 17: Thunderbird RARF- ADOT Highway 45077 Arterial - Freeway OCT-DEC 2032 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No Yes Yes No No DOT19-827 traffic interchange 2029 2029 - 3,769,434 - 3,769,434 2032. Defer work and apportionment year from Road TI HURF Interstate improvements 2025 to 2029. Increase right-of-way phase.

Principal Amend: Defer open to traffic year from 2030 to 17: Thunderbird Construct traffic interchange RARF- ADOT Highway 45077 Arterial - Freeway OCT-DEC 2032 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No Yes Yes No No DOT21-824 2030 2030 - 90,868,077 - 90,868,077 2032. Defer work and apportionment year from Road TI improvements HURF Interstate 2027 to 2030. Decrease construction phase.. Amend: Defer open to traffic year from 2029 to Principal Pre-design traffic RARF- 2034. Defer work and apportionment year from ADOT Highway 43447 17: Bell Road TI Arterial - Freeway OCT-DEC 2034 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No No Yes No No -- 2029 2029 - 2,615,946 - 2,615,946 interchange improvements HURF 2024 to 2029. Decrease project pre design Interstate phase. Amend: Defer Open to Traffic Year from JAN- Principal Design traffic interchange RARF- MAR 2029 to OCT-DEC 2034. Defer work and ADOT Highway 43447 17: Bell Road TI Arterial - Freeway OCT-DEC 2034 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No No Yes No No -- 2029 2029 - 11,246,508 - 11,246,508 improvements HURF apportionment year from 2025 to 2029. Increase Interstate project design phase. Amend: Defer open to traffic year from 2029 to Principal Right of way and utilities for RARF- 2034. Defer Work and apportionment year from ADOT Highway 43447 17: Bell Road TI Arterial - Freeway OCT-DEC 2034 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No No Yes No No -- traffic interchange 2029 2029 - 6,179,400 - 6,179,400 HURF 2025 to 2029. Increase project right of way Interstate improvements phase. Amend: Defer open to traffic year from 2029 to Principal Construct traffic interchange RARF- 2034. Defer Work and Apportionment Year from ADOT Highway 43447 17: Bell Road TI Arterial - Freeway OCT-DEC 2034 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No No Yes No No -- 2030 2030 - 116,553,783 - 116,553,783 improvements HURF 2027 to 2030. Increase project construction Interstate phase. 17: Anthem Way - Principal Amend: Defer open to traffic year from 2021 to ADOT Highway 45445 Yavapai County Line Arterial - Freeway OCT-DEC 2022 Maricopa FLCP 13 4 6 Yes No No No Yes No No DOT20-823 Construct widening 2020 RARF 2020 - 50,000,000 - 50,000,000 2022. Change number of lanes after from 5 to 6. (Southbound) Interstate

Page 3 of 9 Date Printed 9/3/2019 TABLE 1: Requested Freeway Life Cycle Program Project Changes to the FY 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and 2040 Regional Transportation Plan1, TIP AMENDMENT #24

Sort: Section, Agency, Location, Work Year

Through Performance Categories Lanes PM1 PM2T PM2N PM2B PM3F PM3S PM3E Federal Functional Classificatio Fed ID / TRACS / Work Funding Apport. 4 3

Agency Section MAG ID Location n MAG Mode Estimate Date for Completion/ to Open Traffic: MM/YY AQ Area Program In Miles Before After Safety Transit Asset Condition Pavement Condition Bridge Condition Travel Reliability Non SOV Travel CMAQ Emissions TIP ID Grant ID ALI Work Year Type Year Federal Regional Local Total TIP Change Request

Principal Amend: Delete TIP Listing. Defer project SR- 101 (Agua Fria): I-10 - Arterial - Other ADOT Highway 6876 Freeway JAN-MAR 2027 Maricopa FLCP 10 8 10 No No No No Yes No No DOT22-821 Pre-Design widening 2022 RARF 2022 - 3,800,000 - 3,800,000 101L widening between I-10 and US-60 to US60 Grand Ave Freeway or 2030. Expressway

Principal Amend: Delete TIP Listing. Defer project SR- 101 (Agua Fria): I-10 - Arterial - Other ADOT Highway 6876 Freeway JAN-MAR 2027 Maricopa FLCP 10 8 10 No No No No Yes No No -- Design widening 2023 RARF 2023 - 17,000,000 - 17,000,000 101L widening between I-10 and US-60 to US60 Grand Ave Freeway or 2030. Expressway

Principal Amend: Delete TIP Listing. Defer project SR- 101 (Agua Fria): I-10 - Arterial - Other ADOT Highway 6876 Freeway JAN-MAR 2027 Maricopa FLCP 10 8 10 No No No No Yes No No -- Right of way for widening 2023 RARF 2023 - 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 101L widening between I-10 and US-60 to US60 Grand Ave Freeway or 2030. Expressway

Principal Amend: Delete TIP Listing. Defer project SR- 101 (Agua Fria): I-10 - Arterial - Other ADOT Highway 6876 Freeway JAN-MAR 2027 Maricopa FLCP 10 8 10 No No No No Yes No No -- Construct widening 2025 RARF 2025 - 246,500,000 - 246,500,000 101L widening between I-10 and US-60 to US60 Grand Ave Freeway or 2030. Expressway

Principal Amend: New TIP Listing. Improvements to the 101: I-10 System Arterial - Pre-Design for SR-101L/I-10 interchange will be constructed ADOT Highway -- Interchange Other Freeway OCT-DEC 2027 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No No Yes No No DOT22-838 2022 RARF 2022 - 4,428,570 - 4,428,570 Interchange Improvements independent of the general purpose lane Improvements Freeway or widening. Expressway

Principal Amend: New TIP Listing. Improvements to the 101: I-10 System Arterial - Design for Interchange SR-101L/I-10 interchange will be constructed ADOT Highway -- Interchange Other Freeway OCT-DEC 2027 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No No Yes No No DOT23-802 2023 NHPP 2023 12,000,000 3,448,500 - 15,448,500 Improvements independent of the general purpose lane Improvements Freeway or widening. Expressway

Principal Amend: New TIP Listing. Improvements to the 101: I-10 System Arterial - Right-of-Way Acquisition SR-101L/I-10 interchange will be constructed ADOT Highway -- Interchange Other Freeway OCT-DEC 2027 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No No Yes No No DOT23-803 for Interchange 2023 RARF 2023 - 2,379,069 - 2,379,069 independent of the general purpose lane Improvements Freeway or Improvements widening. Expressway

Principal Amend: New TIP Listing. Improvements to the 101: I-10 System Arterial - Construction for SR-101L/I-10 interchange will be constructed ADOT Highway -- Interchange Other Freeway OCT-DEC 2027 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No No Yes No No -- 2025 RARF 2025 - 180,232,500 - 180,232,500 Interchange Improvements independent of the general purpose lane Improvements Freeway or widening. Expressway

Principal Amend: New TIP Listing. Improvements to the Arterial - 101: Northern Ave Construction for SR-101L/Northern Avenue interchange will be ADOT Highway -- Other Freeway OCT-DEC 2027 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No No Yes No No -- 2025 RARF 2025 - 10,000,000 - 10,000,000 TI Interchange Improvements constructed independent of the general purpose Freeway or lane widening. Expressway

Principal Amend: Defer project open year from 2029 to 101: US60 to 75th Arterial - Other Pre-design general purpose RARF- 2030. Clarify number of lanes before/after. Defer ADOT Highway 45442 Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 5 8 10 No No No No Yes No No -- 2027 2027 - 1,822,923 - 1,822,923 Ave Freeway or lanes HURF project pre design phase from 2025 to 2027. Expressway Increase project predesign phase.

Page 4 of 9 Date Printed 9/3/2019 TABLE 1: Requested Freeway Life Cycle Program Project Changes to the FY 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and 2040 Regional Transportation Plan1, TIP AMENDMENT #24

Sort: Section, Agency, Location, Work Year

Through Performance Categories Lanes PM1 PM2T PM2N PM2B PM3F PM3S PM3E Federal Functional Classificatio Fed ID / TRACS / Work Funding Apport. 4 3

Agency Section MAG ID Location n MAG Mode Estimate Date for Completion/ to Open Traffic: MM/YY AQ Area Program In Miles Before After Safety Transit Asset Condition Pavement Condition Bridge Condition Travel Reliability Non SOV Travel CMAQ Emissions TIP ID Grant ID ALI Work Year Type Year Federal Regional Local Total TIP Change Request

Principal Amend: Defer project open year from 2029 to 101: US60 to 75th Arterial - Other Design general purpose RARF- 2030. Clarify number of lanes before/after. Defer ADOT Highway 45442 Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 5 8 10 No No No No Yes No No -- 2028 2028 - 8,187,705 - 8,187,705 Ave Freeway or lanes HURF project design phase from 2026 to 2028. Expressway Increase project design phase.

Principal Arterial - Amend: New listing. Defer project open year 101: US60 to 75th Right-of-Way Acquisition RARF- ADOT Highway 45442 Other Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 5 8 10 No No No No Yes No No -- 2028 2028 - 514,950 - 514,950 from 2029 to 2030. Clarify number of lanes Ave for general purpose lanes HURF Freeway or before/after. Add project right of way phase. Expressway

Principal Amend: Defer project open year from 2029 to 101: US60 to 75th Arterial - Other Construct general purpose RARF- 2030. Clarify number of lanes before/after. Defer ADOT Highway 45442 Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 5 8 10 No No No No Yes No No -- 2029 2029 - 84,894,657 - 84,894,657 Ave Freeway or lanes HURF project construction phase from 2027 to 2029. Expressway Decrease project construction phase..

Principal Amend: Defer project open from Jan-Mar 2026 Arterial - Other Pre-design general purpose ADOT Highway 46658 101:75th Ave to I-17 Freeway OCT-DEC 2026 Maricopa FLCP 6 8 10 No No No No Yes No No DOT21-821 2021 RARF 2021 - 1,822,923 - 1,822,923 to Oct-Dec 2026. Increase project pre-design Freeway or lanes phase. Expressway

Principal Amend: Add TIP ID. Add Defer project open Arterial - Other Design general purpose ADOT Highway 46658 101:75th Ave to I-17 Freeway OCT-DEC 2026 Maricopa FLCP 6 8 10 No No No No Yes No No DOT23-804 2023 NHPP 2023 3,180,000 5,007,705 - 8,187,705 from Jan-Mar 2026 to Oct-Dec 2026. Increase Freeway or lanes project design phase. Expressway

Principal Arterial - Amend: New listing. Add project right of way Right-of-Way Acquisition ADOT Highway 46658 101:75th Ave to I-17 Other Freeway OCT-DEC 2026 Maricopa FLCP 6 8 10 No No No No Yes No No DOT23-805 2023 RARF 2023 - 514,950 - 514,950 phase. Defer project open from Jan-Mar 2026 to for general purpose lanes Freeway or Oct-Dec 2026. Expressway

Principal Amend: Add TIP ID. Defer project open from Arterial - Other Construct general purpose ADOT Highway 46658 101:75th Ave to I-17 Freeway OCT-DEC 2026 Maricopa FLCP 6 8 10 No No No No Yes No No DOT24-801 2024 NHPP 2024 64,384,000 35,959,157 - 100,343,157 Jan-Mar 2026 to Oct-Dec 2026. Increase project Freeway or lanes construction phase. Expressway

Principal Amend: Defer open to traffic year from 2022 to 101 (Pima): Princess Arterial - Other ADOT Highway 72670 Freeway OCT-DEC 2025 Maricopa FLCP 4 8 10 No No No No Yes No No DOT20-702 Design freeway widening 2021 RARF 2021 - 6,756,144 - 6,756,144 2025. Defer work and apportionment year from Dr - Shea Blvd Freeway or 2017 to 2021. Increase project design phase. Expressway

Principal Amend: New listing. Add project right of way 101 (Pima): Arterial - Utility and Right-of-Way phase. Defer open to traffic year from 2022 to ADOT Highway 72670 Princess Dr - Shea Other Freeway OCT-DEC 2025 Maricopa FLCP 4 8 10 No No No No Yes No No DOT21-838 2021 RARF 2021 - 514,950 - 514,950 for freeway widening 2025. Defer work and apportionment year from Blvd Freeway or 2017 to 2021. Expressway

Page 5 of 9 Date Printed 9/3/2019 TABLE 1: Requested Freeway Life Cycle Program Project Changes to the FY 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and 2040 Regional Transportation Plan1, TIP AMENDMENT #24

Sort: Section, Agency, Location, Work Year

Through Performance Categories Lanes PM1 PM2T PM2N PM2B PM3F PM3S PM3E Federal Functional Classificatio Fed ID / TRACS / Work Funding Apport. 4 3

Agency Section MAG ID Location n MAG Mode Estimate Date for Completion/ to Open Traffic: MM/YY AQ Area Program In Miles Before After Safety Transit Asset Condition Pavement Condition Bridge Condition Travel Reliability Non SOV Travel CMAQ Emissions TIP ID Grant ID ALI Work Year Type Year Federal Regional Local Total TIP Change Request

Principal Amend: Defer open to traffic year from 2022 to 101 (Pima): Princess Arterial - Other 2025. Defer work and apportionment year from ADOT Highway 72670 Freeway OCT-DEC 2025 Maricopa FLCP 4 8 10 No No No No Yes No No DOT21-701 Construct freeway widening 2023 NHPP 2023 54,000,000 15,971,406 - 69,971,406 Dr - Shea Blvd Freeway or 2020 to 2023. Increase project construction Expressway phase.

Principal Amend: Defer open year from 2020 to 2025. 101 (Pima): Pima Rd Arterial - Other Design roadway Defer Work and Apportionment Year from 2019 ADOT Highway 1709 Freeway OCT-DEC 2025 Maricopa FLCP 3 4 4 No No No No Yes No No DOT98-111 2024 RARF 2024 - 297,000 - 297,000 Extension (JPA) Freeway or improvements to 2024. Clarify number of lanes before and Expressway work description.

Principal Amend: Defer open year from 2020 to 2025. 101 (Pima): Pima Rd Arterial - Other Construct roadway Defer Work and Apportionment Year from 2020 ADOT Highway 1709 Freeway OCT-DEC 2025 Maricopa FLCP 3 4 4 No No No No Yes No No DOT99-124 2025 RARF 2025 - 3,634,000 - 3,634,000 Extension (JPA) Freeway or improvements to 2025. Clarify number of lanes before and Expressway work description. 202 (South Mountain): I-10 Principal Amend: Split P3 maintenance into two TIP Maricopa (MP 54) to I-Arterial - Other ADOT Highway 46948 Freeway OCT-DEC 2019 Maricopa FLCP 22 0 8 No No No No Yes No No DOT22-826 P3 Maintenance 2022 RARF 2022 - 2,856,616 - 2,856,616 listings; separate maintenance payment to 10 Papago (MP 76) Freeway or come in 2026. (Design-Build- Expressway Maintain) 202 (South Principal Mountain): I-10 Arterial - Amend: New Listing. Split P3 maintenance into Maricopa (MP 54) to ADOT Highway 46948 Other Freeway OCT-DEC 2019 Maricopa FLCP 22 0 8 No No No No Yes No No -- P3 Maintenance 2026 RARF 2026 - 3,215,146 - 3,215,146 two TIP listings; separate maintenance payment I-10 Papago (MP 76) Freeway or to come in 2026. (Design-Build- Expressway Maintain) Principal 202 (Red Mountain): Amend Defer open to traffic from 2025 to 2030. Arterial - Other RARF- ADOT Highway 29293 Broadway Road - Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 11 6 8 No No No No Yes Yes No DOT21-828 Pre-Design HOV lane 2027 2027 - 1,029,900 - 1,029,900 Defer Work and Apportionment Year from 2021 Freeway or HURF Gilbert Road to 2027. Increase project pre-design phase. Expressway

Principal 202 (Red Mountain): Amend Defer open to traffic from 2025 to 2030. Arterial - Other RARF- ADOT Highway 29293 Broadway Road - Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 11 6 8 No No No No Yes Yes No DOT22-828 Design HOV lane 2028 2028 - 7,466,775 - 7,466,775 Defer Work and Apportionment Year from 2022 Freeway or HURF Gilbert Road to 2028. Increase project design phase. Expressway

Principal 202 (Red Mountain): Amend Defer open to traffic from 2025 to 2030. Arterial - Other RARF- ADOT Highway 29293 Broadway Road - Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 11 6 8 No No No No Yes Yes No -- Construct HOV lane 2029 2029 - 77,355,789 - 77,355,789 Defer Work and Apportionment Year from 2024 Freeway or HURF Gilbert Road to 2029. Increase project construction phase. Expressway

Principal 202 (Santan): Arterial - Other Construct traffic interchange ADOT Highway 48510 Freeway JUL-SEP 2022 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No No Yes No No DOT21-826 2021 NHPP 2021 22,840,000 4,102,184 - 26,942,184 Amend: Increase project construction phase. Lindsay Road TI Freeway or and frontage roads Expressway

Principal 202 (Santan): Gilbert Arterial - Other Design general purpose Amend: Delete TIP Listing. Project will be ADOT Highway 36807 Freeway JAN-MAR 2025 Maricopa FLCP 11 8 10 No No No No Yes No No DOT22-825 2022 RARF 2022 - 6,000,000 - 6,000,000 Rd - I-10 Freeway or lanes constructed in two phases. Expressway

Principal 202 (Santan): Gilbert Arterial - Other Construct general purpose Amend: Delete TIP Listing. Project will be ADOT Highway 36807 Freeway JAN-MAR 2025 Maricopa FLCP 11 8 10 No No No No Yes No No -- 2024 RARF 2024 - 83,700,000 - 83,700,000 Rd - I-10 Freeway or lanes constructed in two phases. Expressway

Page 6 of 9 Date Printed 9/3/2019 TABLE 1: Requested Freeway Life Cycle Program Project Changes to the FY 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and 2040 Regional Transportation Plan1, TIP AMENDMENT #24

Sort: Section, Agency, Location, Work Year

Through Performance Categories Lanes PM1 PM2T PM2N PM2B PM3F PM3S PM3E Federal Functional Classificatio Fed ID / TRACS / Work Funding Apport. 4 3

Agency Section MAG ID Location n MAG Mode Estimate Date for Completion/ to Open Traffic: MM/YY AQ Area Program In Miles Before After Safety Transit Asset Condition Pavement Condition Bridge Condition Travel Reliability Non SOV Travel CMAQ Emissions TIP ID Grant ID ALI Work Year Type Year Federal Regional Local Total TIP Change Request Principal Amend: New TIP Listing. Split the SR202L, Arterial - Gilbert Rd - I-10 project into two segments. 202 (Santan): Val Design general purpose ADOT Highway -- Other Freeway OCT-DEC 2028 Maricopa FLCP 8 8 12 No No No No Yes No No DOT24-802 2024 NHPP 2024 11,680,000 3,356,540 - 15,036,540 Extend the first segment out to Val Vista Drive Vista Dr to SR-101 lanes Freeway or and rescope from one to two general purpose Expressway lanes between Gilbert Road and SR-101L. Principal Amend: New TIP Listing. Split the SR202L, Arterial - Gilbert Rd - I-10 project into two segments. 202 (Santan): Val Right-of-way for freeway ADOT Highway -- Other Freeway OCT-DEC 2028 Maricopa FLCP 8 8 12 No No No No Yes No No DOT24-803 2024 RARF 2024 - 514,950 - 514,950 Extend the first segment out to Val Vista Drive Vista Dr to SR-101 improvements Freeway or and rescope from one to two general purpose Expressway lanes between Gilbert Road and SR-101L. Principal Amend: New listing. Split the SR202L, Gilbert Arterial - Rd - I-10 project into two segments. Extend the 202 (Santan): Val Construction of general ADOT Highway -- Other Freeway OCT-DEC 2028 Maricopa FLCP 8 8 12 No No No No Yes No No -- 2026 RARF 2026 - 148,820,550 - 148,820,550 first segment out to Val Vista Drive and rescope Vista Dr to SR-101 purpose lanes Freeway or from one to two general purpose lanes between Expressway Gilbert Road and SR-101L. Principal Arterial - 202 (Santan): SR- Design general purpose RARF- Amend: New listing. Split the SR202L, Gilbert ADOT Highway -- Other Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 4 10 12 No No No No Yes No No -- 2027 2027 - 4,737,540 - 4,737,540 101 to I-10 lanes HURF Rd - I-10 project into two segments. Freeway or Expressway Principal Arterial - 202 (Santan): SR- Right-of-way for freeway RARF- Amend: New listing. Split the SR202L, Gilbert ADOT Highway -- Other Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 4 10 12 No No No No Yes No No -- 2027 2027 - 514,950 - 514,950 101 to I-10 improvements HURF Rd - I-10 project into two segments. Freeway or Expressway Principal Arterial - 202 (Santan): SR- Construction of general RARF- Amend: New listing. Split the SR202L, Gilbert ADOT Highway -- Other Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 4 10 12 No No No No Yes No No -- 2027 2027 - 46,757,460 - 46,757,460 101 to I-10 purpose lanes HURF Rd - I-10 project into two segments. Freeway or Expressway Principal 24 (Williams Arterial - Gateway): Ellsworth Right of way for new Amend: New TIP listing. Increase project right of ADOT Highway 85620 Other Freeway APR-JUN 2022 Maricopa FLCP 3 0 4 No No No No Yes No No DOT20-867 2020 NHPP 2020 25,744,000 3,536,932 6,436,000 35,716,932 Rd - Meridian Rd, freeway way phase. Freeway or Phase 1 Expressway 24 (Williams Principal Gateway): Ellsworth Arterial - Other ADOT Highway 85620 Freeway APR-JUN 2022 Maricopa FLCP 3 0 4 No No No No Yes No No DOT20-828 Construct new freeway 2020 NHPP 2020 82,067,000 3,191,227 24,663,000 109,921,227 Amend: Increase project construction phase. Rd - Meridian Rd, Freeway or Phase 1 Expressway

24 (Williams Principal Gateway): Meridian Arterial - Other ADOT Highway 143 Freeway APR-JUN 2022 Pinal FLCP 1 0 4 No No No No Yes No No DOT20-833 Construct new freeway 2020 NHPP 2020 22,933,000 721,786 1,207,000 24,861,786 Amend: Increase project construction phase. Rd - Ironwood Rd, Freeway or Phase 1 Expressway Amend: Defer open to traffic from 2023 to 2030. 30 (Tres Rios): Increase lanes from 4 to 6. Clarify work SR303L - SR202L Design fencing for new description. Defer work and apportionment ADOT Highway 10389 ---- Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 14 0 6 No No No No Yes No No DOT18-701 2024 RARF 2024 - 1,029,900 - 1,029,900 South Mountain, freeway corridor years from 2020 to 2024. Defer freeway design Phase 1 outside the funded program. Decrease design phase 30 (Tres Rios): Amend: Defer open to traffic from 2023 to 2030. SR303L - SR202L Right of way and utilities Increase lanes from 4 to 6. Clarify work ADOT Highway 10389 ---- Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 14 0 6 No No No No Yes No No DOT18-704 2020 RARF 2020 - 66,943,500 - 66,943,500 South Mountain, for new freeway description. Increase project right of way and Phase 1 utility phase. 30 (Tres Rios): Amend: New TIP Listing. Defer open to traffic SR303L - SR202L Right of way and utilities from 2023 to 2030. Increase lanes from 4 to 6. ADOT Highway 10389 ---- Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 14 0 6 No No No No Yes No No DOT21-836 2021 NHPP 2021 52,000,000 14,943,500 - 66,943,500 South Mountain, for new freeway Clarify work description. Increase project right of Phase 1 way and utility phase.

Page 7 of 9 Date Printed 9/3/2019 TABLE 1: Requested Freeway Life Cycle Program Project Changes to the FY 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and 2040 Regional Transportation Plan1, TIP AMENDMENT #24

Sort: Section, Agency, Location, Work Year

Through Performance Categories Lanes PM1 PM2T PM2N PM2B PM3F PM3S PM3E Federal Functional Classificatio Fed ID / TRACS / Work Funding Apport. 4 3

Agency Section MAG ID Location n MAG Mode Estimate Date for Completion/ to Open Traffic: MM/YY AQ Area Program In Miles Before After Safety Transit Asset Condition Pavement Condition Bridge Condition Travel Reliability Non SOV Travel CMAQ Emissions TIP ID Grant ID ALI Work Year Type Year Federal Regional Local Total TIP Change Request 30 (Tres Rios): Amend: New TIP Listing. Defer open to traffic SR303L - SR202L Right of way and utilities from 2023 to 2030. Increase lanes from 4 to 6. ADOT Highway 10389 ---- Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 14 0 6 No No No No Yes No No DOT22-839 2022 NHPP 2022 40,000,000 11,495,000 - 51,495,000 South Mountain, for new freeway Clarify work description. Increase project right of Phase 1 way and utility phase. 30 (Tres Rios): Amend: New TIP Listing. Defer open to traffic SR303L - SR202L Right of way and utilities from 2023 to 2030. Increase lanes from 4 to 6. ADOT Highway 10389 ---- Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 14 0 6 No No No No Yes No No DOT23-806 2023 NHPP 2023 101,703,000 32,184,000 - 133,887,000 South Mountain, for new freeway Clarify work description. Increase project right of Phase 1 way and utility phase. 30 (Tres Rios): Amend: New TIP Listing. Defer open to traffic SR303L - SR202L Right of way and utilities from 2023 to 2030. Increase lanes from 4 to 6. ADOT Highway 10389 ---- Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 14 0 6 No No No No Yes No No DOT24-804 2024 NHPP 2024 48,455,000 106,544,950 - 154,999,950 South Mountain, for new freeway Clarify work description. Increase project right of Phase 1 way and utility phase. Amend: Defer open to traffic from 2023 to 2030. 30 (Tres Rios): Increase lanes from 4 to 6. Clarify work SR303L - SR202L Construct fencing for new ADOT Highway 10389 ---- Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 14 0 6 No No No No Yes No No DOT22-827 2024 RARF 2024 - 4,119,600 - 4,119,600 description. Defer work and apportionment South Mountain, freeway corridor years from 2020 to 2024. Defer freeway Phase 1 construction outside the funded program.

Principal Amend: Defer open to traffic date from 2022 to 303 (Estrella): MC 85 Arterial - Other RARF- ADOT Highway 45939 Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 5 0 6 No No No No Yes No No DOT19-701 H6870 Design Freeway 2027 2027 - 17,528,898 - 17,528,898 2030. Defer work and apportionment year from - Van Buren St Freeway or HURF 2020 to 2027. Increase project design phase. Expressway

Principal Amend: Defer open to traffic date from 2022 to 303 (Estrella): MC 85 Arterial - Other ADOT Highway 45939 Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 5 0 6 No No No No Yes No No DOT19-805 H6870 Right of way for freeway 2020 RARF 2020 6,179,400 6,179,400 2030. Modify work description. Reduce project - Van Buren St Freeway or right of way phase. Expressway Principal Arterial - Amend: New TIP Listing. Defer open to traffic 303 (Estrella): MC ADOT Highway 45939 Other Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 5 0 6 No No No No Yes No No DOT21-837 H6870 Right of way for Freeway 2021 RARF 2021 6,179,400 6,179,400 date from 2022 to 2030. Modify work 85 - Van Buren St Freeway or description. Increase project right of way phase. Expressway Principal Arterial - Amend: New TIP Listing. Defer open to traffic 303 (Estrella): MC ADOT Highway 45939 Other Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 5 0 6 No No No No Yes No No DOT22-840 H6870 Right of way for Freeway 2022 RARF 2022 6,179,400 6,179,400 date from 2022 to 2030. Modify work 85 - Van Buren St Freeway or description. Increase project right of way phase. Expressway Principal Arterial - Amend: New TIP Listing. Defer open to traffic 303 (Estrella): MC ADOT Highway 45939 Other Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 5 0 6 No No No No Yes No No DOT23-807 H6870 Right of way for Freeway 2023 RARF 2023 6,179,400 6,179,400 date from 2022 to 2030. Modify work 85 - Van Buren St Freeway or description. Increase project right of way phase. Expressway Principal Arterial - Amend: New TIP Listing. Defer open to traffic 303 (Estrella): MC ADOT Highway 45939 Other Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 5 0 6 No No No No Yes No No DOT24-805 H6870 Right of way for Freeway 2024 RARF 2024 6,179,400 6,179,400 date from 2022 to 2030. Modify work 85 - Van Buren St Freeway or description. Increase project right of way phase. Expressway Principal Arterial - Amend: New listing. Defer open to traffic date 303 (Estrella): MC ADOT Highway 45939 Other Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 5 0 6 No No No No Yes No No -- H6870 Right of way for Freeway 2025 RARF 2025 6,395,679 6,395,679 from 2022 to 2030. Modify work description. 85 - Van Buren St Freeway or Increase project right of way phase. Expressway

Principal Amend: Defer open to traffic date from 2022 to 303 (Estrella): MC 85 Arterial - Other 2030. Defer work and apportionment year from ADOT Highway 45939 Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 5 0 6 No No No No Yes No No DOT21-801 H6870 Construct Freeway 2028 NHPP 2028 63,800,000 186,012,544 - 249,812,544 - Van Buren St Freeway or 2020 to 2028. Increase project construction Expressway phase.

Page 8 of 9 Date Printed 9/3/2019 TABLE 1: Requested Freeway Life Cycle Program Project Changes to the FY 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and 2040 Regional Transportation Plan1, TIP AMENDMENT #24

Sort: Section, Agency, Location, Work Year

Through Performance Categories Lanes PM1 PM2T PM2N PM2B PM3F PM3S PM3E Federal Functional Classificatio Fed ID / TRACS / Work Funding Apport. 4 3

Agency Section MAG ID Location n MAG Mode Estimate Date for Completion/ to Open Traffic: MM/YY AQ Area Program In Miles Before After Safety Transit Asset Condition Pavement Condition Bridge Condition Travel Reliability Non SOV Travel CMAQ Emissions TIP ID Grant ID ALI Work Year Type Year Federal Regional Local Total TIP Change Request Principal 303 (Estrella): Arterial - Other Pre-design traffic Amend: Delete TIP listing. Reallocate funding to ADOT Highway 11514 Northern Ave/Olive Freeway JUL-SEP 2025 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No No Yes No No DOT21-827 2021 RARF 2021 - 150,000 - 150,000 Freeway or interchange improvements the SR-101L, 75th Avenue to I-17 project. Ave TI Expressway

Principal 303 (Estrella): Arterial - Other Design traffic interchange Amend: Delete TIP listing. Reallocate funding to ADOT Highway 11514 Northern Ave/Olive Freeway JUL-SEP 2025 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No No Yes No No -- 2023 RARF 2023 - 1,300,000 - 1,300,000 Freeway or improvements the SR-101L, 75th Avenue to I-17 project. Ave TI Expressway

Principal 303 (Estrella): Arterial - Other Right of way for traffic Amend: Delete TIP listing. Reallocate funding to ADOT Highway 11514 Northern Ave/Olive Freeway JUL-SEP 2025 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No No Yes No No DOT20-829 2020 RARF 2020 - 600,000 - 600,000 Freeway or interchange improvements the SR-101L, 75th Avenue to I-17 project. Ave TI Expressway

Principal 303 (Estrella): Arterial - Other Construct traffic interchange Amend: Delete TIP listing. Reallocate funding to ADOT Highway 11514 Northern Ave/Olive Freeway JUL-SEP 2025 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 No No No No Yes No No -- 2024 RARF 2024 - 11,100,000 - 11,100,000 Freeway or improvements the SR-101L, 75th Avenue to I-17 project. Ave TI Expressway

Principal 303 (Estrella): Happy Arterial - Other Construct general purpose Amend: Defer project open date from 2020 to ADOT Highway 5658 Valley Pkwy - Lake Freeway OCT-DEC 2022 Maricopa FLCP 6 4 6 No No No No Yes No No DOT19-828 2020 NHPP 2020 10,000,000 24,851,816 - 34,851,816 Freeway or lanes 2022. Decrease project construction phase. Pleasant Pkwy Expressway Principal Arterial - 85: Warner Street Amend: New TIP Listing. Defer project open ADOT Highway 39146 Other Freeway OCT-DEC 2022 Maricopa FLCP 0.2 0 4 No No No No Yes No No DOT20-866 Design new bridge 2020 RARF 2020 - 200,000 - 200,000 Bridge from 2018 to 2022. Freeway or Expressway Amend: Add TIP ID. Advance open year from 60 (Grand Ave): 35th Principal Design intersection 2028 to 2027. Clarify project work description. ADOT Highway 42572 Ave/Indian School Freeway OCT-DEC 2027 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 Yes No No No Yes No No DOT23-808 2023 NHPP 2023 3,180,000 5,007,705 - 8,187,705 Arterial - Other improvements Advance work and apportionment year from Rd Intersection 2025 to 2023. Increase project design phase. 60 (Grand Ave): Principal 35th Ave/Indian Right of way for Amend: New TIP Listing. Add project right of ADOT Highway 42572 Arterial - Freeway OCT-DEC 2027 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 Yes No No No Yes No No DOT23-809 2023 NHPP 2023 52,400,000 15,058,450 - 67,458,450 School Rd intersection improvements way phase. Other Intersection Amend: Advance open year from 2028 to 2027. 60 (Grand Ave): 35th Principal Construct intersection Clarify project work description. Advance work ADOT Highway 42572 Ave/Indian School Freeway OCT-DEC 2027 Maricopa FLCP 0 0 0 Yes No No No Yes No No -- 2025 RARF 2025 - 84,832,863 - 84,832,863 Arterial - Other improvements and apportionment year from 2026 to 2025. Rd Intersection Increase project construction phase.

Principal Amend: Defer open year from 2021 to 2030. 60 (Superstition): Arterial - Other RARF- Increase project design phase. Defer work and ADOT Highway 23494 Crismon Rd - Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 2 4 8 No No No No Yes No No DOT18-832 Design Freeway 2028 2028 - 2,502,657 - 2,502,657 Freeway or HURF apportionment year from 2018 to 2028. Meridian Rd Expressway Increase project design phase.

Principal 60 (Superstition): Amend: Defer open year from 2021 to 2030. Arterial - Other RARF- ADOT Highway 23494 Crismon Rd - Freeway OCT-DEC 2030 Maricopa FLCP 2 4 8 No No No No Yes No No DOT20-830 Construct Freeway 2029 2029 - 26,283,048 - 26,283,048 Defer work and apportionment year from 2018 Freeway or HURF Meridian Rd to 2029. Decrease project construction phase. Expressway

Notes 1. Rows in the report are sorted in order by the following columns: Section, Agency, Location, 2. The following are used to indicate MAG Committees reviewing these TIP listings 3. The year the federal funds (if any) were apportioned by Congress. This item is 4. For federal projects, this is the year the project will authorize. For transit 5. Changes made since Management Committee are tinted in purple highlight. 6. Changes made since conformity mailout are tinted in green highlight

Page 9 of 9 Date Printed 9/3/2019

Transportation Policy Committee INFORMATION SUMMARY

AGENDA ITEM # 4C

DATE September 11, 2019

SUBJECT

Fiscal Year 2020 Arterial Life Cycle Program Project Changes

CONTACT John Bullen, Transportation Economic and Finance Program Manager, or Kristin Myers, Transportation Planner III, (602) 254-6300.

SUMMARY The Fiscal Year (FY) 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and 2040 MAG Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) were approved by the MAG Regional Council on June 28, 2017. The Fiscal Year 2020 Arterial Life Cycle Program (ALCP) was approved by the MAG Regional Council on June 26, 2019. Since then, additional changes and modifications have been requested by member agencies. The project changes detailed in Table 2 include adjustments to the Northern Parkway: 99th Avenue to 91st Avenue (ACI-NOR-10-03-D) and Southern at Stapley Drive (ACI-SOU- 10-03-B) projects. The changes have no adverse impact to the fiscal balance of the ALCP.

PUBLIC INPUT None.

1 PROS & CONS PROS: Approval of this TIP amendment and administrative modification will allow the projects to proceed in a timely manner.

CONS: Approval of this item does not guarantee full utilization of current year funding and additional changes may be required.

TECHNICAL & POLICY IMPLICATIONS TECHNICAL: Projects that wish to utilize transportation federal funds need to be shown in the TIP in the year that they expect to commence and may need to undergo an air quality conformity analysis or consultation. All projects that are programmed with Federal Highway Administration Federal Fiscal Year 2020 funds must submit their project for obligation to the Arizona Department of Transportation no later than June 1, 2020 or funding may be lost from the project and from the region. POLICY: This amendment and administrative modification request is in accord with MAG guidelines.

ACTION NEEDED Recommend approval of amendments and administrative modifications, as appropriate, to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program, 2020 Arterial Life Cycle Program, and 2040 MAG Regional Transportation Plan.

PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS On September 11, 2019, the MAG Management Committee recommended approval of amendments and administrative modifications, as appropriate, to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program, 2020 Arterial Life Cycle Program, and 2040 MAG Regional Transportation Plan.

2 MEMBERS ATTENDING

Queen Creek: John Kross, Chair Litchfield Park: Bill Stephens Goodyear: Julie Arendall, Vice Chair *City of Maricopa: Rick Horst ADOT: Eric Gudino as proxy for Maricopa County: Reid Spaulding as John Halikowski proxy for Joy Rich Apache Junction: Bryant Powell Mesa: Christopher Brady Avondale: Gina Montes as proxy for Paradise Valley: Jill Keimach Charles Montoya Peoria: Thomas Adkins as proxy for Buckeye: Roger Klingler Jeff Tyne *Carefree: Gary Neiss Phoenix: Ed Zuercher *Cave Creek: Carrie Dyrek Pinal County: Himanshu Patel as Chandler: Marsha Reed proxy for Greg Stanley El Mirage: Crystal Dyches *Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian *Florence: Brent Billingsley Community: Bryan Meyers *Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation: *Scottsdale: Jim Thompson Phil Dorchester Surprise: Mark Schott as proxy for #Fountain Hills: David Trimble as Mike Frazier proxy for Grady Miller Tempe: Marge Zylla as proxy for #Gila Bend: Kathy Valenzuela Andrew Ching *Gila River Indian Community: Tolleson: Reyes Medrano, Jr. Kathyleen Curley Valley Metro/RPTA: Alexis Kinsey as Gilbert: Rene Guillen as proxy for proxy for Scott Smith Patrick Banger Wickenburg: Vince Lorefice

Glendale: Ryan Lee as proxy for Kevin Youngtown: Jeanne Blackman Phelps #Guadalupe: Jeff Kulaga

* Those members neither present nor represented by proxy. # Participated by telephone conference call.

3 TABLE 2: Requested Arterial Life Cycle Program (ALCP) Project Changes to the FY 2020 Arterial Life Cycle Program, FY 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), and 2040 Regional Transportation Plan1, TIP AMENDMENT #24

Through Performance Categories Lanes PM1 PM2T PM2N PM2B PM3F PM3S PM3E

Federal Functional Reimb. Classificati MAG Work Funding Fiscal Fund Regional 4

Agency Section RTP ID Location on Mode Estimate Open: Date Area AQ In Program Miles Before After Safety Transit Asset Condition Pavement Condition Bridge Condition Travel Reliability SOV Non Travel CMAQ Emissions TIP ID Work Year Type Federal Regional Local Total Year Type Reimb. TIP Change Request Amend: Modify project location limits. Increase Northern Parkway: Maricopa Principal APR-JUN miles to account for the construction of a raised Highway ACI-NOR-10-03-D 99th Ave to 87th Street Maricopa ALCP 1.5 4 8 No No No No Yes No No MMA19-112UTZ Construct Utilities (AC) 2019 Local - - 3,000,000 3,000,000 County Arterial - Other 2024 median with lane tapering from 91st to 87th Avenue Avenues.

Amend: Modify project location limits. Increase Northern Parkway: Maricopa Principal APR-JUN Design intersection miles to account for the construction of a raised Highway ACI-NOR-10-03-D 99th Ave to 87th Street Maricopa ALCP 1.5 4 8 No No No No Yes No No MMA20-112DZ 2019 Local - - 1,710,000 1,710,000 County Arterial - Other 2024 improvement (AC) median with lane tapering from 91st to 87th Avenue Avenues.

Amend: Modify project location limits. Increase Northern Parkway: Maricopa Principal APR-JUN Acquisition of right-of-way for miles to account for the construction of a raised Highway ACI-NOR-10-03-D 99th Ave to 87th Street Maricopa ALCP 1.5 4 8 No No No No Yes No No MMA15-112RWZ 2020 Local - - 1,700,000 1,700,000 County Arterial - Other 2024 roadway widening (AC) median with lane tapering from 91st to 87th Avenue Avenues.

Amend: Modify project location limits. Increase Northern Parkway: Maricopa Principal APR-JUN Design intersection miles to account for the construction of a raised Highway ACI-NOR-10-03-D 99th Ave to 87th Street Maricopa ALCP 1.5 4 8 No No No No Yes No No MMA20-112RRB 2020 STP-MAG 500,000 - (500,000) - 2020 STP-MAG 500,000 County Arterial - Other 2024 improvement (Reimb) median with lane tapering from 91st to 87th Avenue Avenues..

Amend: Modify project location limits. Increase Northern Parkway: Maricopa Principal APR-JUN Acquisition of right-of-way for miles to account for the construction of a raised Highway ACI-NOR-10-03-D 99th Ave to 87th Street Maricopa ALCP 1.5 4 8 No No No No Yes No No MMA19-112RWZ 2021 STP-MAG 1,603,100 - (1,603,100) - 2021 STP-MAG 1,603,100 County Arterial - Other 2024 roadway widening (Reimb) median with lane tapering from 91st to 87th Avenue Avenues.

Amend: Modify project location limits. Increase Northern Parkway: Maricopa Principal APR-JUN miles to account for the construction of a raised Highway ACI-NOR-10-03-D 99th Ave to 87th Street Maricopa ALCP 1.5 4 8 No No No No Yes No No MMA20-112UTRB Construct Utilities (Reimb) 2021 STP-MAG 2,338,480 - (2,338,480) - 2021 STP-MAG 2,338,480 County Arterial - Other 2024 median with lane tapering from 91st to 87th Avenue Avenues..

Amend: Modify project location limits. Increase Northern Parkway: Maricopa Principal APR-JUN Design intersection miles to account for the construction of a raised Highway ACI-NOR-10-03-D 99th Ave to 87th Street Maricopa ALCP 1.5 4 8 No No No No Yes No No MMA21-112RRB 2021 STP-MAG 550,000 - (550,000) - 2021 STP-MAG 550,000 County Arterial - Other 2024 improvement (Reimb) median with lane tapering from 91st to 87th Avenue Avenues.

Amend: Modify project location limits. Increase Northern Parkway: Maricopa Principal APR-JUN Construct Roadway miles to account for the construction of a raised Highway ACI-NOR-10-03-D 99th Ave to 87th Street Maricopa ALCP 1.5 4 8 No No No No Yes No No MMA14-112CZ 2022 Local - - 34,659,000 34,659,000 County Arterial - Other 2024 Widening (AC) median with lane tapering from 91st to 87th Avenue Avenues.

Amend: Modify project location limits. Increase Northern Parkway: Maricopa Principal APR-JUN Construct Roadway miles to account for the construction of a raised Highway ACI-NOR-10-03-D 99th Ave to 87th Street Maricopa ALCP 1.5 4 8 No No No No Yes No No MMA20-112CZ 2022 STP-MAG 7,478,854 - (7,478,854) - 2022 STP-MAG 7,478,854 County Arterial - Other 2024 Widening (Reimb) median with lane tapering from 91st to 87th Avenue Avenues..

Amend: Modify project location limits. Increase Northern Parkway: Maricopa Principal APR-JUN Construct Roadway miles to account for the construction of a raised Highway ACI-NOR-10-03-D 99th Ave to 87th Street Maricopa ALCP 1.5 4 8 No No No No Yes No No MMA23-112CZ 2023 STP-MAG 2,000,000 - (2,000,000) - 2023 STP-MAG 2,000,000 County Arterial - Other 2024 Widening (Reimb) median with lane tapering from 91st to 87th Avenue Avenues.

Amend: Modify project location limits. Increase Northern Parkway: Maricopa Principal APR-JUN Construct Roadway miles to account for the construction of a raised Highway ACI-NOR-10-03-D 99th Ave to 87th Street Maricopa ALCP 1.5 4 8 No No No No Yes No No MMA24-112CZ 2024 STP-MAG 1,630,000 - (1,630,000) - 2024 STP-MAG 1,630,000 County Arterial - Other 2024 Widening (Reimb) median with lane tapering from 91st to 87th Avenue Avenues.

Southern Ave at Principal APR-JUN Construct intersection Amend: Modify work description. Decrease local Mesa Highway ACI-SOU-10-03-B Street Maricopa ALCP 1 4 6 Yes No No No Yes No No MES19-150CZ 2020 Local - - 9,825,974 9,825,974 Stapley Dr Arterial - Other 2021 improvement budget by $4,082,696.7.

Amend: Modify work description. Add local Southern Ave at Principal APR-JUN Construct intersection Mesa Highway ACI-SOU-10-03-B Street Maricopa ALCP 1 4 6 Yes No No No Yes No No MES20-150CRB 2020 STP-MAG 7,276,933 - 414,785 7,691,718 2020 STP-MAG 7,276,933 contribution. Increase total project budget by Stapley Dr Arterial - Other 2021 improvement $414,785.

Page 1 of 2 Date Printed 8/20/2019 TABLE 2: Requested Arterial Life Cycle Program (ALCP) Project Changes to the FY 2020 Arterial Life Cycle Program, FY 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), and 2040 Regional Transportation Plan1, TIP AMENDMENT #24

Through Performance Categories Lanes PM1 PM2T PM2N PM2B PM3F PM3S PM3E

Federal Functional Reimb. Classificati MAG Work Funding Fiscal Fund Regional 4

Agency Section RTP ID Location on Mode Estimate Open: Date Area AQ In Program Miles Before After Safety Transit Asset Condition Pavement Condition Bridge Condition Travel Reliability SOV Non Travel CMAQ Emissions TIP ID Work Year Type Federal Regional Local Total Year Type Reimb. TIP Change Request Amend: Modify work description. Decrease Southern Ave at Principal APR-JUN Construct intersection federal budget by $31,811. Add local Mesa Highway ACI-SOU-10-03-B Street Maricopa ALCP 1 4 6 Yes No No No Yes No No MES20-150CZ 2020 HSIP-AZ 5,789,182 - 329,983 6,119,165 2020 HSIP-AZ 5,789,182 Stapley Dr Arterial - Other 2021 improvement contribution. Increase total project budget by $298,172.

Southern Ave at Principal APR-JUN Project Savings for Admin: No change. Listing shown for Mesa Highway ACI-SOU-10-03-B Street Maricopa ALCP 1 4 6 Yes No No No Yes No No MES20-150SAVZ 2020 RARF - 175,175 (175,175) - 2020 RARF 175,175 Stapley Dr Arterial - Other 2021 intersection improvement informational purposes only.

Southern Ave at Principal APR-JUN Acquisition of right-of-way for Admin: No change. Listing shown for Mesa Highway ACI-SOU-10-03-B Street Maricopa ALCP 1 4 6 Yes No No No Yes No No MES21-150RRB 2020 RARF - 500,000 (500,000) - 2020 RARF 500,000 Stapley Dr Arterial - Other 2021 intersection improvement informational purposes only.

Southern Ave at Principal APR-JUN Savings for intersection Admin: No change. Listing shown for Mesa Highway ACI-SOU-10-03-B Street Maricopa ALCP 1 4 6 Yes No No No Yes No No MES21-150SAVZ 2021 RARF - 3,000,000 (3,000,000) - 2021 RARF 3,000,000 Stapley Dr Arterial - Other 2021 improvement informational purposes only.

Notes 1. Rows in the report are sorted in order by the following columns: Section, Agency, Location, and 2. The following are used to indicate MAG Committees reviewing these TIP listings for 3. The year the federal funds (if any) were apportioned by Congress. This 4. For federal projects, this is the year the project will authorize. For transit projects, Work Year. Changes are in red font. Deletions are shown in strike through font. amendment: TRC = Transportation Review Committee, MC = Management Committee, TPC item is included only for informational purposes. this is the year the project will appear in a grant. = Transportation Policy Committee

Page 2 of 2 Date Printed 8/20/2019

Transportation Policy Committee INFORMATION SUMMARY

AGENDA ITEM # 4D

DATE September 11, 2019

SUBJECT MAG Roadway Safety Program (RSP) Draft Policies and Procedures

CONTACT Margaret Herrera, MAG Transportation Safety Program Manager, (602) 254-6300.

SUMMARY The new MAG Roadway Safety Program (RSP) will be administered by MAG to supplement the state’s Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), and assist with providing additional funding in the short term. MAG has identified approximately $2.0 million a year of available federal funds for the FY 2020 to FY 2024 period. To be more cost effective, MAG proposed, and received support from ADOT, to transpose the federal funds for Highway User Revenue Fund (HURF) funds to be used on a number of small safety projects in both urban and rural areas in the MAG region. The availability of HURF funding will ensure that projects can be developed and implemented quickly, and provide immediate results that will reduce the number of roadway deaths and injuries.

1 MAG staff and a working group made up of members of the Transportation Safety Committee developed the RSP goals, objectives, and programming criteria. The resulting RSP Draft Policies and Procedures document is provided as an attachment. Key elements of the Policies and Procedures document include:

I. Program Management and Administration; Goals and Objectives, Program Reporting and MAG Committee Process II. Programming; Programming of Funds, Updates, Amendments and Administrative Adjustments, Availability of Funds, Reallocation of Project Savings III. Project Details; Lead Agencies, Project Budgets, Project Eligibility, Reimbursable Expenditures, Local Match and Ineligible Expenditures IV. Project Requirements; Project Application, Joint Agency Agreement, Reimbursement Requests, Progress Reports, Project Completion Approval of the RSP Policies and Procedures by the MAG Regional Council is required for this new funding program before MAG can issue a call for projects.

PUBLIC INPUT None.

PROS & CONS PROS: Provides MAG member agencies flexibility and agility to address near term safety needs with lower cost solutions. CONS: None.

TECHNICAL & POLICY IMPLICATIONS TECHNICAL: Local agencies that wish to utilize RSP funds will submit applications through an annual call for projects. Projects will require listing in the MAG TIP. Oversight of the RSP and developing a list of RSP projects will be provided by the MAG Transportation Safety Committee for recommendation to the MAG Transportation Review Committee and Policy Committees. MAG will submit projects for funding authorization to the Arizona Department of Transportation.

2 POLICY: This new program will require development, recommendation and approval of RSP Policies and Procedures through the MAG approval process.

ACTION NEEDED Recommend approval of the MAG Roadway Safety Program (RSP) Draft Policies and Procedures, and amendment of the MAG 2040 Regional Transportation Plan as appropriate.

PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS On September 11, 2019, the MAG Management Committee recommended approval of the MAG Roadway Safety Program (RSP) Draft Policies and Procedures, and amendment of the MAG 2040 Regional Transportation Plan as appropriate. MEMBERS ATTENDING

Queen Creek: John Kross, Chair Litchfield Park: Bill Stephens Goodyear: Julie Arendall, Vice Chair *City of Maricopa: Rick Horst ADOT: Eric Gudino as proxy for Maricopa County: Reid Spaulding as John Halikowski proxy for Joy Rich Apache Junction: Bryant Powell Mesa: Christopher Brady Avondale: Gina Montes as proxy for Paradise Valley: Jill Keimach Charles Montoya Peoria: Thomas Adkins as proxy for Buckeye: Roger Klingler Jeff Tyne *Carefree: Gary Neiss Phoenix: Ed Zuercher *Cave Creek: Carrie Dyrek Pinal County: Himanshu Patel as Chandler: Marsha Reed proxy for Greg Stanley El Mirage: Crystal Dyches *Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian *Florence: Brent Billingsley Community: Bryan Meyers *Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation: *Scottsdale: Jim Thompson Phil Dorchester Surprise: Mark Schott as proxy for #Fountain Hills: David Trimble as Mike Frazier proxy for Grady Miller Tempe: Marge Zylla as proxy for #Gila Bend: Kathy Valenzuela Andrew Ching *Gila River Indian Community: Tolleson: Reyes Medrano, Jr. Kathyleen Curley Valley Metro/RPTA: Alexis Kinsey as Gilbert: Rene Guillen as proxy for proxy for Scott Smith Patrick Banger Wickenburg: Vince Lorefice 3 Glendale: Ryan Lee as proxy for Kevin Youngtown: Jeanne Blackman Phelps #Guadalupe: Jeff Kulaga

* Those members neither present nor represented by proxy.

# Participated by telephone conference call.

On August 27, 2019, the MAG Transportation Safety Committee met and unanimously voted to recommend approval of the RSP Draft Policies and Procedures document.

MEMBERS ATTENDING *AARP: Vacant Maricopa County DOT: Jessica May *ADOT: Kerry Wilcoxon for Nicolaas Swart Apache Junction: Shane Kiesow #Maricopa (City): Josh Plumb Avondale: Tom Peterson Mesa: Maria Deeb for #Buckeye: John Willett Ryan Hudson #Chandler: Dana Alvidrez *Paradise Valley: Jeremy Knapp #El Mirage: Nick Russo Peoria: Brandon Forrey FHWA: Jeff King for Chris Lemka Gilbert: Jaspreet Anand Phoenix: Carl Langford (Chair) Glendale: Debbie Albert Pinal County: Kathy Borquez for Kiran Guntupalli Scottsdale: Sam Taylor *GOHS: Alberto Gutier Surprise: Dana Owsiany *Goodyear: Hugh Bigalk #Tempe: Julian Dresang *Litchfield Park: Brendon Squire *RPTA: Adrian Ruiz

4

MAG ROADWAY SAFETY PROGRAM:

POLICIES AND

PROCEDURES 2019

RSP Draft Policies and Procedures RSIPAugust Policies 28, 2019 and Procedures – August 20, 2019

1

TABLE OF CONTENTS Draft 8-28-2019

BACKGROUND ...... - 1 - I. MAG ROADWAY SAFETY PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION ...... - 2 - SECTION 100: PROGRAM GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ...... - 2 - SECTION 110: APPLICABILITY OF THE MAG ROADWAY SAFETY PROGRAM POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ...... - 3 -` SECTION 120: PROGRAM REPORTING ...... - 3 - SECTION 130: MAG COMMITTEE PROCESS ...... - 4 - II. PROGRAMMING THE MAG ROADWAY SAFETY PROGRAM ...... - 5 - SECTION 200: PROGRAMMING THE RSP ...... - 5 - SECTION 210: UPDATING PROJECTS IN THE RSP ...... - 7 - SECTION 220: TYPES OF RSP PROJECT UPDATES ...... - 8 - SECTION 230: PROGRAM OR PROJECT AMENDMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENTS ...... - 8 - SECTION 240: AVAILABILITY OF PROGRAM FUNDS...... - 9 - SECTION 250: REALLOCATION OF PROJECT SAVINGS ...... - 9 - III. PROJECT DETAILS ...... - 10 - SECTION 300: LEAD AGENCIES ...... - 10 - SECTION 310: RSP PROJECT BUDGETS ...... - 11 - SECTION 320: PROJECT ELIGIBILITY ...... - 12 - SECTION 330: REIMBURSABLE EXPENDITURES ...... - 13 - SECTION 340: LOCAL MATCH AND INELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES ...... - 14 - IV. RSP PROJECT REQUIREMENTS ...... - 16 - SECTION 400: PROJECT APPLICATION ...... - 16 - SECTION 410: PROJECT JOINT AGENCY AGREEMENT ...... - 16 - SECTION 420: PROJECT REIMBURSEMENT REQUESTS ...... - 18 - SECTION 430: PROGRESS REPORTS ...... - 20 - SECTION 440: PROJECT COMPLETION ...... - 20 - APPENDIX A. GLOSSARY AND ACRONYMS ...... - 22 -

2

3

BACKGROUND

In 2019, MAG initiated development of the MAG Roadway Safety Program (RSP). This roadway safety funding program was proposed by MAG to supplement the state’s Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) program, and assist with providing additional funding in the short term. MAG will facilitate the regional safety program that can directly improve the safety conditions of our roadways in all areas of MAG, whether rural or dense urban. MAG has developed this program to address these critical regional funding needs in the near term.

The MAG region will be updating the Strategic Transportation Safety Plan that will: 1) identify additional short term projects to feed into the RSP through 2024, and 2) provide suggested long- term safety programming to be included in a new Regional Transportation Plan/regional funding plan estimated for approval prior to December 2024. MAG member agencies continue to advocate for transportation system safety through implementation of transportation projects in the region. With this two-phased approach, the region will augment and assist the state in reducing traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads across the region.

To address flexibility and agility to implement these near term safety needs with lower cost solutions, MAG has identified approximately $2.0 million a year of sub-allocated federal funds available for the FY 2020 to FY 2024 period. MAG will coordinate with ADOT to substitute MAG Sub-allocated Surface Transportation Block Grant program funds, noted as an equal return of MAG 2.6% funding Highway User Revenue Funds (HURF) that could then be used to fund a number of small safety projects throughout the region.

The RSP Policies and Procedures were approved by the Transportation Policy Committee on Month Date, Year and by the Regional Council on Month Date, Year. Updates to the RSP Policies and Procedures will be generated with input from the MAG Transportation Safety Committee and revisions presented through the MAG Committee Process for approval.

The RSP relies upon two main elements:

1. Policies and Procedures. Policies, which provide direction to decisions and processes, in conjunction with procedures, which specify the steps needed to implement these specified policies; and,

2. Project Requirements. Joint Agency Agreements (JAA), which define the roles and requirements for agencies participating in the implementation of each Project; Project Application, which define the scope of the project and ensure that it aligns with the intent of the RSP goals and objectives; Project Reimbursement Requests (PRR), which define the reimbursements for the project per the program amount and fiscal year.

- 1 -

I. MAG Roadway Safety Program Management and Administration

Section 100: Program Goals and Objectives

A. The primary program goal is to implement low cost safety solutions in the near term that supplement the existing state and local programs in addressing transportation safety needs.

1. The RSP goals will be consistent with the Regional transportation safety goals of the approved MAG Strategic Transportation Safety Plan and address the strategies therein.

2. Reduce fatalities and serious injuries in the region by three to seven percent in the next five years, from the base year of 2013.

a. Eliminate Death and Serious Injury from Speeding and Aggressive Driving Behavior

b. Eliminate Death and Serious Injuries at Intersections

c. Eliminate Death and Serious Injuries Involving Vulnerable Users, Bicyclists, Pedestrians and Persons with Disabilities

3. Support ADOT in reducing safety trends by programming RSP projects that address the Arizona Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) goals and Emphasis Areas.

B. The RSP must be documented and has four key objectives:

1. Effective and Efficient Implementation of Safety Improvements: Facilitate the effective and efficient implementation of safety. In support of this objective, the Program should:

a. Ensure Projects are implemented that include proven safety countermeasures that address a historically demonstrated safety issue,

b. Ensure Projects are implemented that include proven safety countermeasures that address safety issues identified utilizing an agency adopted predictive safety analysis method, and

c. Include the means to track safety performance of location(s) where RSP projects are implemented.

2. Accountability: Provide the means to track and ensure effective and efficient Project implementation. In support of this objective, the Program should:

- 2 -

a. Employ comprehensive Joint Agency Agreements (JAAs), or other legal instruments, that detail agency roles and responsibilities in the implementation of specific Projects; and

b. Provide the means within each JAA, Project Application and Project Reimbursement Request to track Project implementation, performance and successful completion of individual Projects and the Program.

3. Transparency: Provide members of the public, elected officials, stakeholders, participating agencies and others with ready access to information on the Program and on each Project. In support of this objective, the Program should:

a. Include substantial public and stakeholder consultation as part of the implementation process for each Project; and

b. Require that material project changes to Projects in the Program be subject to public and stakeholder involvement through the MAG Committee Process.

4. Compliance: Comply with all applicable federal, state and local requirements in the implementation of Projects.

C. The Program must be responsive to near terms needs.

Section 110: Applicability of the MAG Roadway Safety Program Policies and Procedures

A. To make changes to the RSP Policies and Procedures:

1. MAG staff will suggest new provisions, additions, and revisions to the RSP Policies and Procedures, when necessary.

2. The MAG Transportation Safety Committee will provide oversight to any changes suggested to the RSP Policies and Procedures.

3. Member agencies may submit suggested changes to MAG.

a. MAG will review the suggested changes and generate an agenda item for the MAG Transportation Safety Committee to consider the changes for possible recommendation through the MAG Committee Process referred to in Section 130.

Section 120: Program Reporting

- 3 -

A. Prior to the beginning of each state fiscal year, the Roadway Safety Program will be reviewed by the MAG Transportation Safety Committee unless otherwise prohibited due to outstanding issues.

B. The adopted MAG Roadway Safety Program will:

1. Provide the status of the Projects: Project additions, Project deletions, changes to Project schedules, Program and Project financing and other necessary components.

2. Verify the revenues and regional reimbursement costs in the RSP.

C. The RSP Status Report will provide the MAG committee members an update on all Project requirements and RSP financial information. Information provided in the status report will include the number of Project Applications, Joint Agency Agreements, and Project Reimbursement Requests submitted and processed by MAG Staff.

1. All participating agencies will provide information to meet the minimum requirements for the audit report by way of the Project Application and Project Reimbursement Request.

Section 130: MAG Committee Process

A. The MAG Committee Process included in Appendix A – Glossary and Acronyms.

B. Final decisions regarding the RSP rest with the MAG Regional Council with recommendations from the Transportation Safety Committee (TSC), Transportation Review Committee (TRC), MAG Management Committee (MC) and the Transportation Policy Committee (TPC).

1. The MAG Committee Process will apply for the:

a. Approval of amendments to the RSP Policies and Procedures;

b. Adoption of the MAG Roadway Safety Program;

c. Approval of amendments to the RSP and TIP.

- 4 -

II. Programming the MAG Roadway Safety Program

Section 200: Programming the RSP

A. MAG establishes regional funding limits, reimbursement phases, scopes, and priorities for all RSP Projects with oversight by the MAG Transportation Review Committee.

1. The regional funding for the RSP is based on the Federal Highway Administration, Sub- allocated Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) program funding, for an equal return of MAG Highway User Revenue Funds (HURF) noted as 2.6% funds by ADOT Financial Management Services.

2. The HURF funding distribution to the RSP is based on the Funding Substitution Table established by MAG in coordination with ADOT. The Funding Substitution Table may be updated on an annual basis, or as needed, to adjust for ledger balances of the identified STBG funds. The table may be published in the MAG Programming Guidebook, annually.

3. Project sponsors must adhere to guidelines and requirements of HURF funding.*

4. *For agencies not eligible to receive HURF funding, FHWA sub-allocated Surface Transportation Block Grant Funds will be available. Project sponsors receiving FHWA funding, must adhere to federal guidelines and requirements.

5. Updates as needed will be included in the Transportation Programming Guidebook published annually.

B. MAG will issue a call for projects annually in August for the following fiscal year. As an example, on August 3, 2020 (FY2021) issue notice of Call for FY2022 Projects. Deferments are not allowed under any circumstances. If a Lead Agency determines at any time during the project development that the project is not feasible, MAG must be notified in writing within the first six months of authorization.

C. All RSP Projects must be programmed in the local government agencies Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and the approved MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) before they may be reimbursed. Notation of sub-allocated funding with the CIP may be accepted.

D. A commitment letter from the City/County/Town Manager or designee will be the basis of programming decisions for work and/or reimbursement in the first two years of the RSP.

- 5 -

E. Before a project may be programmed for work and/or reimbursement in the first two (2) years of the current or draft RSP (as an example FY 2020 being the current and FY 2021 being the next FY of the TIP), the Lead Agency must:

1. Demonstrate sufficient local funding for the project is programmed in the Lead Agency’s CIP or TIP

a. For multi-jurisdictional projects, the Lead Agency is responsible for collecting CIP and other budgetary documents from the project partners that demonstrate the availability of local funds.

2. Submit a commitment letter signed by the City/County/Town manager or designee and copies of the current draft of the agency’s CIP that demonstrate local funding for the project.

a. The lead agency’s City/County/Town Manager or designee must sign the commitment letter. The designee must be department director level or higher.

b. A commitment letter template will be provided by MAG.

c. The commitment letter shall certify that that local funds, staff time, and resources are committed to develop, obligate, implement, and complete the project as requested.

F. During the annual RSP update, Project Reimbursements will be programmed in accordance with the following guidelines:

1. Eligible Projects:

a. Design must be programmed in the local government agency’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP), or noted as a general suballocation area, before any regional reimbursement may be programmed within the twenty-four (24) months. Regional Council approval of the RSP list of projects begins the 24-month time period.

2. Exceptions to the programming guidelines may be approved though the MAG committee process.

a. Requests should go to the MAG Transportation Safety Committee for a technical review and recommendation.

b. Geometric changes may need to be included in a conformity analysis prior to inclusion in the State Transportation Improvement Program (e.g. reducing vehicle lanes).

- 6 -

G. Programming of Projects funded by the RSP must be consistent with the RSP and the RSP Policies and Procedures. The Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) is the agency designated to implement the MAG Roadway Safety Program ensuring the estimated cost of the program improvements does not exceed the total amount of available revenues.

1. All RSP Projects will be reviewed annually, and the RSP will be programmed and produced at the beginning of each fiscal year.

a. The Lead Agency for each RSP Project will be responsible for Project updates.

b. MAG Staff will produce a programming schedule each fiscal year.

c. If a program surplus occurs, the following action will be taken:

i. Determine the amount available.

ii. MAG staff will provide members of the MAG Transportation Review Committee a detailed overview of the available revenues.

iii. Notification of funding will be made via an addition to the next Call for Projects, or as directed by the Transportation Review Committee.

2. Certain projects that reduce or expand thru traffic lanes may be contingent on a new finding of air quality conformity

a. Additional completion time may be allocated to the project if Regional Council action is delayed by three (3) or more months.

Section 210: Updating Projects in the RSP

A. All RSP Projects will be updated annually (refer to Section 200(F) 2).

B. Any necessary changes to an RSP Project must be submitted by a written request stating the new updated schedule and budget and any other necessary justifications.

1. Requests will be approved through the MAG Committee Process by the approval of the RSP.

2. Update forms will be provided by MAG.

3. Deferrals are not allowed under any circumstances.

- 7 -

C. MAG, the Lead Agency, and other agency(ies)/jurisdiction(s) listed in the Joint Agency Agreement must agree to the proposed changes or updates.

Section 220: Types of RSP Project Updates

A. If an original RSP Project is deemed not feasible:

1. The Lead Agency must submit a written request to MAG. The written request must include:

a. Justification, such as a feasibility study, level of service justification, or other documents explaining why the Project is deemed not feasible, and the description of steps to overcome any issues related to deleting the original Project from the RSP and TIP.

b. Upon acceptance of the justification, MAG may terminate the original Joint Agency Agreement.

c. The Lead Agency may cancel the project at any time and provide a brief statement.

Section 230: Program or Project Amendments and Administrative Adjustments

A. If a necessary Program or Project update (Section 220) falls outside of the RSP or, TIP update schedule, then an amendment to the RSP, and the TIP, will be required, as appropriate.

1. Proposed amendments that in whole or in part negatively impact Projects in the TIP and/or RSP may not be approved.

2. Amendments are subject to approval through the MAG Committee Process on a case-by- case basis.

3. The Lead Agency and other agency(ies)/jurisdiction(s) listed in the Joint Agency Agreement must agree to the proposed changes.

B. The Lead Agency listed in the Joint Agency Agreement, typically initiates the amendment process by making a written request to MAG.

1. If an amendment is approved by MAG, corresponding amendments are required for the appropriate programs and or agreements.

C. MAG Staff will review each request for:

- 8 -

1. Funding changes identified from the original Project allocation, the contingency allowance, the overall revised budget and other key aspects of the funding, change in lead agency or partners, reimbursement or reallocation.

2. Consistency with the approved RSP Policies and Procedures.

Section 240: Availability of Program Funds

A. If there is a balance of program funds in a given year, existing Projects may be accelerated. Any acceleration will occur according to priority order of the RSP.

1. For Projects to be accelerated, design costs must be committed as local funds in lieu of local match.

a. At least 60% Design must be complete.

B. If there are surplus funds available upon the full completion of the RSP, the MAG Transportation Review Committee will discuss options regarding additional Projects.

Section 250: Reallocation of Project Savings

A. Project Savings from the RSP will not be determined by MAG to be eligible for reallocation, unless and until:

1. Construction has been completed and the work satisfies the original intent and scope of the Project, as included in the Joint Agency Agreement and Project Application, and there are remaining regional funds allocated to the Project if earlier than the 24-month time limit as described in Section 200.f.1.a ; OR,

a. A high degree of certainty is obtained that construction for the original RSP Project will be completed consistent with the Joint Agency Agreement and Project Application specified scope and schedule if earlier than the 24-month time limit.

b. OR, the 24-month time limit has expired.

2. The project has been reimbursed or the Final PRR documenting all project costs has been accepted by MAG.

- 9 -

III. Project Details

Section 300: Lead Agencies

A. A Lead Agency must be identified for each RSP Project.

1. The Lead Agency is required to be a MAG member agency.

2. One Lead Agency per Project will be accepted. For segmented Projects, please refer to Section 300(D).

3. The designation of a Lead Agency for each Project will be accomplished through the signed Joint Agency Agreement with MAG.

B. The Lead Agency is responsible for all aspects of project implementation, including, but not limited to, Project management, financing, risk management, public involvement, design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction.

1. The Lead Agency and MAG will be signatories to the Joint Agency Agreement.

2. The Lead Agency and the agency(ies)/jurisdiction(s) listed in the Joint Agency Agreement are expected generally to use accepted financial and project management policies, practices, and procedures in the use of funds received from the RSP and in the implementation of the RSP Project.

C. Projects in One Jurisdiction

1. If a Project falls entirely within one jurisdiction, then that jurisdiction is expected to be the Lead Agency.

a. If there is change in jurisdictions due to annexation that affects a Project, the Lead Agency designated at the time of Project implementation will continue to serve as the Lead Agency.

2. An alternative agency may be specified as the Lead Agency if the local jurisdiction in which the Project is located agrees.

a. An agreement between the local jurisdiction and the Lead Agency must be documented in writing between the respective Town/City Managers, County/Community Administrator or designees.

b. A copy of that written agreement must be provided to MAG.

- 10 -

D. Projects in Multiple Jurisdictions

1. In cases where the RSP Project is located in more than one jurisdiction, the Project may be implemented as either:

a. One Project with a single Lead Agency as agreed to by the agency(ies)/jurisdiction(s) listed in the Joint Agency Agreement.

i. The agreement to this effect between the local jurisdictions and the Lead Agency must be documented in writing between the respective Town/City Managers, County/Community Administrator or designees in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and/or an Joint Agency Agreement (JAA).

ii. The agreement will be used to explain multi-jurisdictional roles, responsibilities, local and regional funding, the reimbursement process between the project partners, and other terms of the Project, which will be referenced in the Joint Agency Agreement signed by the Lead Agency.

iii. A copy of this agreement must be provided to MAG, who must agree to the proposed Lead Agency designation.

b. The Project may be segmented and implemented as separate Projects by local jurisdictions, if agreed to by all agencies/jurisdictions listed in the Joint Agency Agreement, and following the Project Update process specified in Section 220.

E. Lead Agency responsibilities may be transferred from one agency to another MAG Member Agency.

1. The currently approved Lead Agency must submit a formal request to MAG.

a. The request must address the project segment name, location, and funding amount to be transferred.

b. The request must be signed by the Transportation/Public Works Director or City/Town Manager from each partnering agency on the segment.

2. Lead Agency change requests must be approved through the MAG Committee process before the change will be incorporated into an approved RSP.

Section 310: RSP Project Budgets

- 11 -

A. The RSP-MAG funding for each Project as specified establishes the maximum amount payable from RSP-MAG funds for that Project.

1. Every payment obligation of MAG under the RSP and any Joint Agency Agreement or related legal agreement is conditional upon the availability of funds appropriated or allocated for the payment of such obligation.

2. The RSP budget and timeline may change to account for surplus Program funds.

B. The budget for each RSP Project:

1. The Lead Agency is responsible for all of the Project costs over the regional contribution and, if applicable, will need to work with the other agency(ies)/jurisdiction(s) listed in the Joint Agency Agreement to cover those costs consistent with any Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) or Joint Agency Agreement (JAA) that may be in place; and

2. Will be included in the TIP.

Section 320: Project Eligibility

A. To be funded or constructed under the RSP Program, Projects must:

1. Be based on recommendations included in a Road Safety Assessment, Project Assessment or other Lead Agency study to identify roadway safety improvements, including an agency adopted predictive safety analysis method.

2. Have a scope, budget (including amounts of RSP funding (construction) and local match (design contributions) and a schedule consistent with the Project as included in RSP and the MAG TIP. In addition, Projects must be consistent with federal requirements, where applicable.

B. Facilities eligible for improvements under the RSP include:

1. All public roadways maintained by the Lead Agency or partner agency that meet HURF eligibility requirements (collector and above).

C. All Projects must be designed to the standards agreed to by the designated local jurisdictions and the Lead Agency established in the Joint Agency Agreement.

1. The agreed standards, which may be higher than the standards used in the local jurisdiction(s), must be specified or referenced in the Joint Agency Agreement.

- 12 -

2. Standards for multi-jurisdictional Projects should be consistent to the extent feasible.

D. The Project Application for each Project must identify all Project components for which reimbursement of the regional share is sought from the RSP, including the components of the Project that will be funded locally or by third parties.

E. Each RSP Project shall have a reimbursement timeline specified in the Joint Agency Agreement and Project Application.

1. Reimbursement timelines may shift due to project schedule changes and/or the availability of program funds.

F. The MAG Committee Process has the final determination on the eligibility of any Project or Project component for reimbursement from the RSP.

Section 330: Reimbursable Expenditures

A. Eligible items include, but are not limited to:

1. Construction and construction administration of safety improvement projects.

2. Projects or components directly related safety improvements.

B. No reimbursements will be made:

1. Prior to the execution of an Joint Agency Agreement.

2. Prior to the approval of a Project Reimbursement Request endorsed by MAG and the ADOT Finance Division.

3. For projects or project work phases not listed in an approved Transportation Improvement Program.

4. Prior to the year in which the funds for that RSP Project are programmed or would normally be received following the schedule in the TIP or there are surplus program funds, Section 270.

B. The Lead Agency shall send the Project Reimbursement Requests to MAG for payment from the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT). The Lead Agency is responsible for:

1. All Project expenditures.

2. Providing all Project Reimbursement Requests to MAG for reimbursement.

- 13 -

3. Distributing RSP reimbursements to project partners per the signed and effective Joint Agency Agreement.

C. Reimbursements will be made for expenditures paid with tax or public revenue only, including development and impact fees collected by a jurisdiction.

1. Reimbursements will not be made for Project elements donated or funded via cash or cash equivalent donations, right-of-way donations, exactions and/or other third party or non- tax funding sources.

2. Reimbursements from the RSP will not be made for expenditures that have already been reimbursed from other sources, either in cash or cash equivalents or through third party contributions including, but not limited to, the provision of a transportation improvement Project such as a design or related study, right-of-way acquisition or donation or construction.

Section 340: Local Match and Ineligible Expenditures

A. Design costs encumbered by the Lead Agency or 10% of total project costs will constitute the Local Match.

B. Notwithstanding findings or recommendations from the Project Assessment or a similar study, Projects, Project components or other costs that are not reimbursable from the RSP include:

1. Enhancement Projects or enhancement components of Projects.

a. If a Lead Agency and other agency(ies)/jurisdiction(s) listed in the Joint Agency Agreement request an enhancement to a Project funded in the RSP, the local jurisdiction and/or Lead Agency shall pay all costs associated with the enhancement (costs in excess of reasonable limits/the local jurisdiction’s typical practice).

2. Any Project or Project element that exceeds the reasonable limits or typical practice for the local jurisdiction in which the Project or Projects are located.

3. Administrative overhead costs by the Lead Agency and other agency(ies)/jurisdiction(s) listed in the Joint Agency Agreement that are not attributed to the Project.

4. Other expenses, such as bad debts and lump-sum incentives, as determined by MAG.

5. Expenditures that occur after a project or project segment is completed. This includes salaries, applied overhead, record keeping and facility maintenance.

- 14 -

6. Salaries and other administrative expenditures pertaining to the completion of RSP Project Requirements.

7. Expenditures related to special events and related materials, such as t-shirt, hats, pens, food/beverages, etc.

8. Non-project specific expenditures, such as computers, data storage devices, etc.

C. Right-of-way acquisition and/or work is not eligible for reimbursement.

D. Funds awards to a member agency by the Arizona Department of Transportation will be considered “above the line” earmark unless deemed otherwise by the MAG Transportation Improvement Program Manager or the MAG Transportation Director. “Above the line” funding awards include:

1. State Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funds

2. State Transportation Alternatives (TA) funds

3. Stimulus funding approved by the US Congress

E. Eligible local match contributions include:

1. Locally funded expenditures on eligible Projects or elements as listed in Section 330; or

2. Third party contributions with supporting documentation that have been donated. Third party contributions will be taken at market value at the time of the donation and mutually agreed upon between the Lead Agency and other agency(ies)/jurisdiction(s) listed in the Joint Agency Agreement and MAG.

3. “Above the line” funding awards from ADOT

F. Determining the value of third party contributions:

1. The jurisdiction’s real estate department will value and appraise any right-of-way given to a Project by a developer.

2. Costs related to the construction of a road must be documented and certified for the value of the road by the authorized representative of the jurisdiction. To do so, a jurisdiction shall do the following in priority order:

a. First, work with the developer(s) to turn in cost documentation related to the road improvement as soon as a jurisdiction is aware the improvement is being made to an

- 15 -

RSP Project, even if the RSP Project is not scheduled for construction or reimbursement until a later date. If this cannot be done, then;

b. Second, generate cost figures from known developer fees, final construction documents, as-built documents, et cetera. If this cannot be done, then;

c. Third, use cost figures from the actual RSP Project construction bid for a cost per unit figure, which then could be applied the developer contribution to generate a total cost. If this cannot be done, then;

d. Fourth, use cost figures from a similar Project in location, size, and scope, which then could be applied to the developer contribution to generate a total cost.

3. MAG Staff will review the valuation method and documentation for quality assurance purposes.

4. All documents used to determine the value of third party contributions shall be kept in accordance with Section 340(G).

IV. RSP Project Requirements

Section 400: Project Application

A. For each RSP Project, the Lead Agency must submit a complete RSP Project Application to MAG before an Joint Agency Agreement will be initiated or signed.

B. The Lead Agency must use the latest RSP Project Application form or MAG supplied form(s).

1. The form will be posted on the MAG RSP website.

2. All fields in all sheets of the Excel based application form must be completed and any necessary paperwork must be included at the time of submission.

3. MAG Staff may require a new or revised RSP Project Application in the event of a material project change or the termination of an Joint Agency Agreement per Section 410(D).

Section 410: Project Joint Agency Agreement

A. An Joint Agency Agreement between MAG and the designated Lead Agency is required for each Project before the reimbursement of expenditures will be initiated.

- 16 -

1. If a Project is completed and eligible for reimbursement following the stipulations in Section 330, an Joint Agency Agreement must be in place before Project Reimbursement Requests are submitted for reimbursement.

B. Signed and effective Joint Agency Agreements may need to be amended or terminated due to material project changes or failing to submit a material or substantial Project Reimbursement Request, as outlined below.

1. A signed and effective Joint Agency Agreement may require an amendment due to project amendments or administrative modifications in the TIP or RSP, which.

a. Change the project limits.

b. Require a revised Project Application due to a material or significant change in the project scope.

2. An effective Joint Agency Agreement may be terminated if:

a. The Project undergoes a material project change. Examples of material project changes include:

i. The Project improvement type (arterial or intersection) listed in the agreement changes;

ii. The Project change affects more than one project or project segment.

iii. The Project change affects more than one effective Joint Agency Agreement; or

iv. The Lead Agency of a Project changes.

b. A Project Reimbursement Request has not been accepted by MAG within 6 months of authorization.

C. Each Joint Agency Agreement will be based on a standard agreement provided by MAG and customized for each Project.

D. The Joint Agency Agreement will address at a minimum:

1. Project scope, type of work, schedule of work and reimbursement.

2. Lead Agency and other agency(ies)/jurisdiction(s) involved in the Project;

3. Applicable Design Standards;

- 17 -

4. Responsibilities of the Parties;

5. Risk and indemnification;

6. Records and audit rights;

7. Term and termination;

8. Availability of Funds; and,

9. Conflicts of Interest.

E. Upon approval of the MAG Roadway Safety Program, an update will be provided to the MAG Transportation Safety Committee regarding the status of Projects, including active Joint Agency Agreements and new Joint Agency Agreements that will be executed during that fiscal year.

F. TIP amendments will still be required to go through the MAG Committee Process for any changes involving cost, scope or schedule changes to the Project.

G. The Lead Agency and MAG must be signatories to the Joint Agency Agreement:

1. To indicate their agreement to the Lead Agency designation and the terms of the agreement, the authorized representative must be the signing authority for that jurisdiction.

2. To indicate roles and responsibilities in Project implementation.

Section 420: Project Reimbursement Requests

A. Any request for payment must use the latest MAG Project Reimbursement Request form.

1. The form will be posted on the MAG RSP website.

2. All fields must be completed and any necessary paperwork must be included at the time of submission.

B. A full Project Reimbursement Request, including request for reimbursement and invoice is due at the time of Project completion.

C. Project Reimbursement Requests may not be submitted more than once per month, unless it is the final request for reimbursement.

- 18 -

D. All Project Reimbursement Requests shall be submitted to MAG for authorization for payment.

E. Participating agencies/jurisdictions may invoice the Lead Agency for any item including, but not limited to, work conducted or capital assets acquired for the Project or as part of the Project, subject to other terms in this agreement.

F. The work conducted and/or received must meet all the requirements of the MAG RSP Policies and Procedures as well as any other applicable state, regional and local requirements.

G. The Lead Agency must retain, certify, and make available all vendor receipts, invoices and as needed, any related Project records.

1. Vendor receipts or invoices must be available for five (5) years after final payment is made; auditors, MAG or its designees may make possible requests.

2. Receipts and invoices for Projects advanced by a jurisdiction may have a longer retention period.

H. Project Reimbursement Requests must be signed by the Lead Agency’s Transportation/Engineering Director or designee.

I. Matching contributions, as required in the RSP Policies and Procedures must be fully documented, invoiced and/or received, and cannot be in arrears.

J. The request for payment shall be approved and signed by the duly authorized representative from the Lead Agency. Then, the request will be processed and approved at MAG and forwarded to ADOT for payment to the Lead Agency.

K. If an item for reimbursement has more than one backup invoice, a summary table must be provided with each reimbursement request that:

1. Lists each invoice/backup documentation number and/or a describes the item(s) being considered for reimbursement;

2. Includes the total dollar amount of all invoices, per each item for reimbursement. This total dollar amount should match the invoice;

3. Includes the inflation rate and inflated amount, where applicable;

4. Lists the associated work phase; and,

5. Includes a subtotal of costs by work phase.

- 19 -

6. MAG will provide summary table examples and templates.

L. Upon MAG approval, the Project Reimbursement Request will be forwarded to ADOT for payment.

1. MAG will work with ADOT to expedite payment dependent on availability of funds.

2. Checks will be distributed from ADOT and sent to Lead Agency.

M. Lead Agencies shall not submit reimbursement requests directly to the Arizona Department of Transportation. Submitting requests directly to ADOT may result in the termination of an executed Joint Agency Agreement.

Section 430: Progress Reports

A. Lead Agencies with Projects programmed for work and/or reimbursement in the first two years of the current RSP must submit an RSP Progress Report to MAG.

B. Lead Agencies must use the latest Progress Report form.

1. The form will be posted on the MAG RSP website.

2. All fields must be completed and any necessary paperwork must be included at the time of submission.

Section 440: Project Completion

A. Lead agency staff will provide a presentation to the Transportation Safety Committee at the first regularly scheduled July meeting after the safety improvement construction is complete. The safety improvement project presentation will include:

1. Project description

2. Before and After photos

3. Description of lessons learned

4. Question and Answer period

B. Annual updates on safety performance of the location or corridor for years one through three after date placed in service.

a. MAG will include the safety performance updates in the annual report.

- 20 -

- 21 -

APPENDIX A. GLOSSARY AND ACRONYMS

Acceleration Acceleration means that all of the remaining Projects, including the reimbursements for advanced Projects, in the MAG Roadway Safety Program are moved forward in priority order.

ADOT Arizona Department of Transportation

Administrative The RSP and Project budgets will be adjusted annually to reflect the Adjustment final Project reimbursement in the fiscal year. This falls after the adoption of the RSP and will not require a program amendment.

CIP Capital Improvement Program

FHWA Federal Highway Administration

Fiscal Year July 1 – June 30 (i.e. July 1, 2005 – June 30, 2006)

HSIP Highway Safety Improvement Program (ADOT)

Incentives Any expenditure, which involves a monetary reward for the inducement of behavior, as related to a project in the RSP (i.e. Giving a contractor/consultant a bonus for completing a project ahead of schedule).

Joint Agency A legally binding contract or agreement between MAG and the Lead Agreement (JAA) Agency established for the RSP Project.

- 22 -

MAG Maricopa Association of Governments

MAG Committee Items are placed for action on the agendas of the MAG Transportation Process Review Committee (TRC), Management Committee, Transportation Policy Committee (TPC), as appropriate, and Regional Council

MC MAG Management Committee

Project A Project Reimbursement Request that has been accepted by MAG Reimbursement Staff as complete. Including all required information, signatures, and Request backup documentation.

Memorandum of A type of agreement used as a bridge to an Joint Agency Agreement. Understanding For example, in the development of Project cost estimates and (MOU) allocations across multiple jurisdictions, which then may be agreed to and incorporated into a more formal Joint Agency Agreement to be executed before further Project implementation.

Program RSP or TIP, depending on context.

Project RSP Project, as described in the RTP and Project-related documents. The Project description includes funding, schedule, Project termini and number of lanes added and other Project features.

Project RSP Projects may include several Project components or major Component elements, such as geometric modifications, ITS applications, bike and pedestrian facilities, etc. The components together comprise the overall RSP Project.

- 23 -

Project A managerial document Lead Agencies must complete for each RSP Application Project prior to signing an Joint Agency Agreement. The Project Application includes the Lead Agency information, summary of the safety issue(s) addressed and associated crash modification factors (CMF) Cost calculation, Crash data, cost estimates, summary of work and local and regional total costs.

Project For the purposes of the material change policy, Project completion Completion means all lanes of the roadway segment or intersection are open to traffic.

For purposes of Joint Agency Agreements or other Project-related legal agreements, Project completion means when all requirements of the Agreements have been completed to the satisfaction of MAG (i.e. it is contract or agreement completion).

An Joint Agency Agreement may establish dates for Project completion considering administrative requirements or other requirements or needs, as determined by MAG to be necessary.

Project The guidelines and forms (request for payment, invoice and progress Reimbursement reports) a Lead Agency must complete when requesting Request (PRR) reimbursement for an RSP Project.

Project Savings RSP regional funds found by MAG to be surplus to an RSP Project, and for which certain criteria as established in the RSP Policies and

Procedures is met, may be noted as Project Savings and reallocated to an RSP Project in that jurisdiction depending on the availability of Program funds.

Reallocation Re-assignment or re-programming of funds unexpended or not expected to be needed from one RSP Project to another RSP Project.

- 24 -

Reimbursement Payment or compensation for costs incurred.

ROW Right-of-Way

RSP MAG Roadway Safety Program, or the “Program”

RSP Regional RSP Regional Funds are generated from a transpose of STBG funds for Funds HURF funds

SHSP Arizona Strategic Highway Safety Plan

Status Report Periodic report produced, at least annually, for the RSP to provide an update on the status of the Program, current revenue and cost projections. The report will provide supporting information for the RTP Annual Report

STIP State Transportation Improvement Program

STBGP or STBGP- Surface Transportation Block Grant Program. A federal-aid highway MAG funding program that funds a broad range of surface transportation capital needs, including many roads, transit, sea and airport access, vanpool, bike, and pedestrian facilities. Funds may be used by States and localities for projects on any Federal-aid highway, including the NHS, bridge projects on any public road, transit capital projects, and intra-city and intercity bus terminals and facilities

STSP MAG Strategic Transportation Safety Plan

- 25 -

STSP-ADOT ADOT Strategic Traffic Safety Plan (2019 pending), formerly known as the State Highway Safety Plan (SHSP)

Substantial A Project Reimbursement Request (PRR) that invoices for at least Project $100,000 or 10 percent of the programmed reimbursement for the Reimbursement fiscal year of the invoice, whichever is less. Request

Third Party Contribution made to an RSP Project other than cash or cash Contribution equivalent funding, typically involving the donation of right-of-way, but may also include other aspects of Project implementation, such as design and construction.

TIP The MAG Transportation Improvement Program. The TIP must be in conformance for air quality purposes, approved by the MAG Regional Council, and approved by the Governor for inclusion in the STIP. The TIP may be amended from time to time. Any references to the TIP mean the currently approved version unless indicated otherwise.

TPC MAG Transportation Policy Committee

TRC MAG Transportation Review Committee

TSC MAG Transportation Safety Committee

- 26 -

Transportation Policy Committee INFORMATION SUMMARY

AGENDA ITEM # 4E

DATE September 11, 2019

SUBJECT Project Changes - Amendment and Administrative

Modification to the FY 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program, FY2019 Transit Program of Projects, and 2040 MAG Regional Transportation Plan.

CONTACT Teri Kennedy, TIP Manager, or Aeysha Alam, Transportation Analyst II, (602) 254-6300.

SUMMARY The Fiscal Year (FY) 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), and the 2040 MAG Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), were approved by the MAG Regional Council on June 28, 2017. The last modifications to the TIP, and RTP were approved at the August 28, 2019 MAG Regional Council meeting. The 2019 Transit Program of Projects (POP) was approved by MAG Regional Council on June 26, 2019. Since then, additional changes and modifications have been requested by member agencies. Please refer to the enclosed material. Project changes requested include:

Table A: General Transit Projects. Table B: General Highway Projects.

1 FY 2019 Transit Program of Projects: The FY 2019 Transit Program of Projects (POP) is being updated to balance the FY 2019 Federal Transit Administration (FTA) grants. The changes include a $26,229 reduction to the 5307 Urbanized Area grant to match the apportionment and a $131 increase to the 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities grant to match the apportionment.

All listings are included in the conformity consultation. Some projects may contingent on a new finding of conformity.

PUBLIC INPUT None

PROS & CONS PROS: Approval of this TIP amendment will allow projects to move forward. CONS: None.

TECHNICAL & POLICY IMPLICATIONS TECHNICAL: Projects that wish to utilize transportation federal funds need to be included in the TIP in the year that they expect to commence and may need to undergo a conformity analysis or consultation. All projects that are programmed with Federal Highway Administration Federal Fiscal Year 2020 funds must be submitted by the lead agency for obligation to the Arizona Department of Transportation no later than June 1, 2020, or funding may be lost from the project and from the region. POLICY: This amendment request is in accord with MAG guidelines.

ACTION NEEDED Recommend approval of amendments and administrative modifications as appropriate to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), FY 2019 Transit Program of Projects, and 2040 MAG Regional Transportation Plan. Some projects may be contingent on a new finding of conformity.

2 PRIOR COMMITTEE ACTIONS On September 11, 2019, the MAG Management Committee recommended approval of amendments and administrative modifications as appropriate to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), FY 2019 Transit Program of Projects, and 2040 MAG Regional Transportation Plan. Some projects may be contingent on a new finding of conformity.

MEMBERS ATTENDING

Queen Creek: John Kross, Chair Litchfield Park: Bill Stephens Goodyear: Julie Arendall, Vice Chair *City of Maricopa: Rick Horst ADOT: Eric Gudino as proxy for Maricopa County: Reid Spaulding as John Halikowski proxy for Joy Rich Apache Junction: Bryant Powell Mesa: Christopher Brady Avondale: Gina Montes as proxy for Paradise Valley: Jill Keimach Charles Montoya Peoria: Thomas Adkins as proxy for Buckeye: Roger Klingler Jeff Tyne *Carefree: Gary Neiss Phoenix: Ed Zuercher *Cave Creek: Carrie Dyrek Pinal County: Himanshu Patel as Chandler: Marsha Reed proxy for Greg Stanley El Mirage: Crystal Dyches *Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian *Florence: Brent Billingsley Community: Bryan Meyers *Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation: *Scottsdale: Jim Thompson Phil Dorchester Surprise: Mark Schott as proxy for #Fountain Hills: David Trimble as Mike Frazier proxy for Grady Miller Tempe: Marge Zylla as proxy for #Gila Bend: Kathy Valenzuela Andrew Ching *Gila River Indian Community: Tolleson: Reyes Medrano, Jr. Kathyleen Curley Valley Metro/RPTA: Alexis Kinsey as Gilbert: Rene Guillen as proxy for proxy for Scott Smith Patrick Banger Wickenburg: Vince Lorefice

Glendale: Ryan Lee as proxy for Kevin Youngtown: Jeanne Blackman Phelps #Guadalupe: Jeff Kulaga * Those members neither present nor represented by proxy.

# Participated by telephone conference call.

3 TABLE A: Requested General Transit Project Changes to the FY 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and 2040 Regional Transportation Plan 1, TIP AMENDMENT #24

Sort: Section, Agency, Location, Work Year TIP Amendment #24 Through PerformancePM2 PM2 Categories Review 2 Lanes PM1 PM2T N B PM3F PM3S PM3E ed By

Federal T Functional Fed ID / TRACS / Work Funding Apport. R M 4 3 Agency Section MAG ID Location Classification MAG Mode TIP ID Grant ID ALI Work Year Type Year Federal Regional Local Total TIP Change Request C C Estimate Estimate Date for Completion/ to Open Traffic: AQArea In Program Miles Before After Safety Asset Transit Condition Pavement Condition Bridge Condition Travel Reliability SOV Non Travel CMAQ Emissions Amend. Increase regional amount by $141,277 to account for Phoenix Round 3 cost savings. MAG Transit 5800 Regionwide Transit Bus OCT-DEC 2019 Maricopa Other 0 0 0 No Yes No No No Yes No MAG17-404T ----- ADA Improvements 2018 PTF 2017 - 142,079 35,520 177,599 Increase local match by $35,520 to indicate 80/20 funding split.

Amend. New Project. These are revenues that CMAQ- MAG Transit 5800 Regionwide Transit Bus N/A MaricopaOther 0 0 0 No Yes No No No Yes No MAG20-802T TBD 2020 2018 7,428,810 1,857,202 9,286,012 have been transferred from FHWA to FTA and Flex are unprogrammed.

Amend. Reduce regional amount by $141,277 and increase local match by $141, 277 to match ADA Improvements Round Phoenix Transit 44832 Eight locations in Phoenix Transit Bus OCT-DEC 2019 Maricopa Other 0 0 0 No Yes No No No Yes No PHX18-811T ------2018 PTF 2018 - 238,991 1,481,177 1,720,168 PRR. Change location from 11 locations to 8 Three locations to match Project Reimbursement Request (PRR).

Amend. Increase federal amount by $131 and Purchase bus: < 30 foot - 18 Phoenix Transit 8434 Regionwide Transit Bus N/A Maricopa TLCP 0 0 0 No Yes No No No Yes No PHX20-703T ----- 11.12.04 2020 5339 2019 1,094,923 193,218 - 1,288,141 increase regional amount by $19 to balance the replace (dial-a-ride) grant. Purchase bus: standard - Phoenix Transit 8434 Regionwide Transit Bus N/A Maricopa TLCP 0 0 0 No Yes No No No Yes No PHX21-805T 11.12.01 2021 5339 2020 2,346,000 414,000 - 2,760,000 Clerical. Add "CNG" to the work description 5 Replace CNG

Purchase bus: Articulated - Phoenix Transit 8434 Regionwide Transit Bus N/A Maricopa Other 0 0 0 No Yes No No No Yes No PHX21-807T 11.13.06 2021 5307 2020 1,695,582 299,220 1,994,802 Amend. New project. 2 expand (rapid)

Purchase bus: 40 foot - 2 Phoenix Transit 8434 Regionwide Transit Bus N/A Maricopa Other 0 0 0 No Yes No No No Yes No PHX21-810T 11.13.01 2021 5339 2020 884,000 156,000 1,040,000 Amend. New project. expand (diesel)

Clerical. Reduce federal amount by $26,229 to balance the grant, reduce match amount proportionally by $6,558. Change match source Phoenix Transit 44311 Regionwide Transit Bus N/A Maricopa Other 0 0 0 No Yes No No No Yes No PHX20-811T ----- 11.7A.00 Preventive Maintenance 2020 5307 2019 7,208,194 1,802,049 9,010,243 from regional to local. Phoenix will get an additional $26,229 in their FY 2020 PM suballocation to make up for this reduction in FY 2019.

Valley AZ-2018-025- High Capacity Transit STBGP- Admin: Change In Program from UPWP to Transit 22981 Fiesta-Downtown Chandler Transit Rail OCT-DEC 2019 Maricopa Other 0 0 0 No Yes No No No Yes No VMR18-838T 44.26.15 2018 2018 480,000 - 120,000 600,000 Metro Rail 01 Alternatives Analysis Study MAG-Flex Other.

Notes 1. Rows in the report are sorted in order by the following columns: Section, Agency, Location, and Work 2. The following are used to indicate MAG Committees reviewing these TIP listings 3. The year the federal funds (if any) were apportioned by Congress. This item is 4. For federal projects, this is the year the project will authorize. For transit Year. Changes are in red font. Deletions are shown in strike through font. for amendment: TRC = Transportation Review Committee, MC = Management included only for informational purposes. projects, this is the year the project will appear in a grant. Committee, TPC = Transportation Policy Committee TABLE B: Requested General Highway Project Changes to the FY 2018-2022 MAG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and 2040 Regional Transportation Plan 1, TIP AMENDMENT #24

Sort: Section, Agency, Location, Work Year TIP Amendment #24 Through Performance Categories Reviewe 2 Lanes PM1 PM2T PM2N PM2B PM3F PM3S PM3E d By

Federal T Functional Fed ID / TRACS / Work Funding Apport. R M Agency Section MAG ID Location Classification MAG Mode TIP ID Grant ID ALI Work Year4 Type Year3 Federal Regional Local Total TIP Change Request C C Estimate Date Date Estimate for Completion/ to Open Traffic: Area AQ Program In Miles Before After Safety Asset Transit Condition Pavement Condition Bridge Condition Travel Reliability SOV Non Travel CMAQ Emissions

99th Ave: Cardinals Way to Indian School Road, Indian School Rd: 99th Avenue to Principal Arterial - Design new fiber Phoenix Highway 45306 27th Avenue, 27th Ave: Indian ITS JUL-SEP 2022 Other 0 0 0 No No No No Yes No No PHX19-806 2019 Local 2019 - - 130,000 130,000 Amend: New TIP listing. Other communications School Road to Camelback Road, and Camelback Rd: 27th Avenue to 23rd Avenue.

99th Ave: Cardinals Way to Indian School Road, Indian School Rd: 99th Avenue to Principal Arterial - Construct New fiber Phoenix Highway 45306 27th Avenue, 27th Ave: Indian ITS JUL-SEP 2022 Other 0 0 0 No No No No Yes No No PHX20-806 2020 Local 2020 - - 4,800,000 4,800,000 Amend: New TIP listing. Other communications School Road to Camelback Road, and Camelback Rd: 27th Avenue to 23rd Avenue.

Deer Valley Rd: 7th Avenue to 7th Street and 7th St: Deer Principal Arterial - Design new fiber Phoenix Highway 13853 ITS JUL-SEP 2022 Other 0 0 0 No No No No Yes No No PHX19-807 2019 Local 2019 - - 42,500 42,500 Amend: New TIP listing. Valley Road to Greenway Other communications Road.

Deer Valley Rd: 7th Avenue to 7th Street and 7th St: Deer Principal Arterial - Construct New fiber Phoenix Highway 13853 ITS JUL-SEP 2022 Other 0 0 0 No No No No Yes No No PHX20-807 2020 Local 2020 - - 2,000,000 2,000,000 Amend: New TIP listing. Valley Road to Greenway Other communications Road.

Amend: Increase federal amount by $575,200 Pinal Design Road Paving & and reduce local amount by $575,200. Change Highway 34051 Russell Rd from SR-84 to Arica Air Quality OCT-DEC 2022 Pinal Other 0 0 0 No No No No No No Yes PNL19-804 PPN-0(219)T T018601D 2019 CMAQ 2019 575,200 - 34,768 609,968 County ADOT PMDR fund local to CMAQ. Inadvertently deleted during Spring Conformity.

Pinal Amend: New TIP listing. This TIP PNL21-801 Highway 34051 Russell Rd from SR-84 to Arica Air Quality OCT-DEC 2022 Pinal Other 0 0 0 No No No No No No Yes PNL21-801C1 PPN-0(219)T T018601C Construct Road Paving 2021 CMAQ 2021 2,699,025 - 163,144 2,862,169 County was removed in error from the TIP. At various locations along Bell Design and review fee for Amend: Delete Project. Community Priority has Surprise Highway 11256 Rd, Grand Av, Bullard Av, and Bike/Ped OCT-DEC 2022 Maricopa Other 0 0 0 No No No No No Yes Yes SUR20-801D ------2020 Local 2020 - - 35,000 35,000 Bikeshare station siting changed Litchfield Rd. At various locations along Bell Bikeshare Equipment Amend: Delete Project. Community Priority has Surprise Highway 11256 Rd, Grand Av, Bullard Av, and Bike/Ped OCT-DEC 2022 Maricopa Other 0 0 0 No No No No No Yes Yes SUR22-805 ------(Bikes, Racks, Kiosks, 2022 CMAQ 2022 213,080 - 12,880 225,960 changed Litchfield Rd. Map Signs) Patton Road/Dynamite Blvd Amend: Delete Project. Community Priority has Surprise Highway 12095 from 163 rd Avenue to 171st Air Quality OCT-DEC 2023 Maricopa Other 1 2 2 No No No No No No Yes SUR21-201D ------Design 2021 Local 2021 - - 84,500 84,500 changed Avenue Patton Road/Dynamite Blvd Amend: Delete Project. Community Priority has Surprise Highway 12095 from 163 rd Avenue to 171st Air Quality OCT-DEC 2023 Maricopa Other 1 2 2 No No No No No No Yes SUR22-202C ------Construct Paving 2022 CMAQ 2022 560,790 - 33,897 594,687 changed Avenue

Rural Road and Southern Principal Arterial - Phase III Construction: HSIP- Amend: Change Work year and Apportinment Tempe Highway 35126 Safety APR-JUN 2019 Maricopa Other 0 0 0 Yes No No No No No No TMP18-402 ------2018 2018 675,324 - 1,037,460 1,712,784 Avenue Other Traffic Signal Improvements MAG year tfrom 2019 to 2018.

Notes 1. Rows in the report are sorted in order by the following columns: Section, Agency, Location, and Work Year. 2. The following are used to indicate MAG Committees reviewing these TIP listings for 3. The year the federal funds (if any) were apportioned by Congress. This item is 4. For federal projects, this is the year the project will authorize. For transit Changes are in red font. Deletions are shown in strike through font. amendment: TRC = Transportation Review Committee, MC = Management included only for informational purposes. projects, this is the year the project will appear in a grant. Committee, TPC = Transportation Policy Committee FY 2019 Transit Program of Projects 8/30/2019

FY 2019 TRANSIT PROGRAM OF PROJECTS (POP) Regional Council Approval: pending September 25, 2019 Agency Location TIP ID TRACS / ALIWork Work Funding Apportion Federal Regional Local Total Year ment Year Avondale Avondale-Goodyear AVN20-801T 57.20.10 Transit Security 2020 5307-AVN 2019$ 18,350 $ - $ 4,588 $ 22,938 Urbanized Area UZA Avondale-Goodyear Associated Transit Improvement: 5307-AVN Avondale Urbanized Area AVN20-880T 44.26.15 Avondale/Goodyear Transit Study 2020 UZA 2019$ 200,000 $ - $ 50,000 $ 250,000 Avondale-Goodyear 5307-AVN Avondale Urbanized Area MAG20-712T 57.20.10 Transit Security 2020 UZA 2019$ 50,000 $ - $ 12,500 $ 62,500 East Buckeye Park and Transit Security: Purchase bike 5307-AVN Buckeye Ride BKY20-880T 57.20.10 lockers 2020 UZA 2019$ 30,000 $ - $ 7,500 $ 37,500 Associated Transit Improvement: East Buckeye Park and Design for the expansion of the 5307-AVN Buckeye Ride BKY20-881T 11.32.04 East Buckeye Park and Ride 2020 UZA 2019$ 200,000 $ - $ 50,000 $ 250,000 Transit Security: Purchase security 5307-AVN Glendale 99th Ave Park and Ride GLN20-880T 57.20.10 cameras 2020 UZA 2019$ 30,000 $ - $ 7,500 $ 37,500 Transit Security: Purchase bike 5307-AVN Goodyear Goodyear Park and Ride GDY20-880T 57.20.10 lockers 2020 UZA 2019$ 11,520 $ - $ 2,880 $ 14,400 Valley Purchase bus: Commuter Coach - 2 5307-AVN Metro/RPTA Regionwide VMT20-708T 11.12.07 replace (ADOT Funded) 2020 UZA 2019$ 1,360,000 $ 240,000 $ - $ 1,600,000 Valley Operating: Operating Assistance 5307-AVN Metro/RPTA Regionwide VMT20-709T 30.09.01 TBD 2020 UZA 2019$ 2,246,660 $ 2,246,660 $ - $ 4,493,320 5307-AVN UVA subtotal $ 4,146,530 $ 2,486,660 $ 134,968 $ 6,768,158

Agency Location TIP ID TRACS / ALIWork Work Funding Apportion Federal Regional Local Total Year ment Year Purchase bus: 30 foot - 1 replace Glendale Regionwide GLN20-701T 11.12.03 (GUS) 2020 5307 2019$ 388,661 $ 68,587 $ - $ 457,248 Glendale Regionwide GLN20-802T 11.7A.00 Preventive Maintenance 2020 5307 2019 $ 83,061 $ - $ 20,765 $ 103,826 Peoria Regionwide PEO20-801T 11.7A.00 Preventive Maintenance 2020 5307 2019 $ 39,138 $ - $ 9,785 $ 48,923 Phoenix Regionwide PHX20-811T 11.7A.00 Preventive Maintenance 2020 5307 2019 $ 7,208,194 $ 1,802,049 $ 9,010,243 Scottsdale Regionwide SCT20-801T 11.7A.00 Preventive Maintenance 2020 5307 2019 $ 174,084 $ - $ 43,521 $ 217,605 Rail Regionwide VMR20-804T 11.7A.00 Preventive Maintenance 2020 5307 2019 $ 1,746,108 $ - $ 436,527 $ 2,182,635 Metro/RPTA Regionwide VMT20-803T 11.7A.00 Preventive Maintenance 2020 5307 2019 $ 4,898,283 $ - $ 1,224,571 $ 6,122,854 MAG Regionwide MAG20-715T ----- Other 2020 5307 2019 $ 1,500,000 $ - $ 375,000 $ 1,875,000 Purchase bus: < 30 foot - 2 replace Peoria Peoria PEO20-701T 11.12.04 (dial-a-ride) 2020 5307 2019$ 164,478 $ 29,026 $ - $ 193,504 Support Services for Grant Phoenix Regionwide PHX19-703T 11.79.00 Management 2020 5307 2019$ 40,000 $ - $ 10,000 $ 50,000 Purchase bus: < 30 foot - 2 replace Phoenix Regionwide PHX20-702T 11.12.01 (dial-a-ride) 2020 5307 2019$ 119,000 $ 21,000 $ 140,000 Purchase bus: Articulated - 15 Phoenix Regionwide PHX20-791T 11.12.06 replace 2020 5307 2019$ 11,946,750 $ 2,108,250 $ 14,055,000

Page 1 of 7 FY 2019 Transit Program of Projects 8/30/2019

FY 2019 TRANSIT PROGRAM OF PROJECTS (POP) Regional Council Approval: pending September 25, 2019 Agency Location TIP ID TRACS / ALIWork Work Funding Apportion Federal Regional Local Total Year ment Year Valley Purchase bus: 30 foot - 4 replace Metro/RPTA Regionwide VMR18-408T 11.12.03 (BUZZ) 2020 5307 2019$ 1,360,000 $ 240,000 $ - $ 1,600,000 Valley Purchase bus: 30 foot - 8 replace Metro/RPTA Regionwide VMT19-701T 11.12.03 (Tempe) 2020 5307 2019$ 2,720,000 $ 480,000 $ 3,200,000 Valley Purchase bus: standard 40 foot - Metro/RPTA Regionwide VMT20-701T 11.12.01 17 replace 2020 5307 2019$ 7,947,500 $ 1,402,500 $ 9,350,000 Valley Purchase bus: Commuter - 4 Metro/RPTA Regionwide VMT20-703T 11.12.07 replace 2020 5307 2019$ 2,890,000 $ 510,000 $ 3,400,000 Purchase bus: standard 40 foot - 5 Phoenix Regionwide PHX20-806T 11.12.01 replace 2020 5307 2019$ 2,273,750 $ 401,250 $ - $ 2,675,000 Purchase bus: < 30 foot - 5 replace Phoenix Regionwide PHX20-703T1 11.12.04 (dial-a-ride) 2020 5307 2019$ 304,109 $ 53,666 $ 357,775 Purchase bus: standard 40 foot - 1 Phoenix Regionwide PHX20-809T 11.13.01 expand (Surprise) 2020 5307 2019$ 454,750 $ 80,250 $ 535,000 Purchase bus: Articulated - 13 Phoenix Regionwide PHX21-704T1 11.12.06 replace 2020 5307 2019$ 10,442,526 $ 1,842,799 $ - $ 12,285,325 5307 subtotal $ 56,700,392 $ 7,237,328 $ 3,922,218 $ 67,859,937

Agency Location TIP ID TRACS / ALIWork Work Funding Apportion Federal Regional Local Total Year ment Year South Central Light Rail: Valley Metro Washington Ave to Fixed guideway corridor - South 5309-New Rail Baseline Rd VMR20-716T ----- Central - Engineering/Final Design 2020 Starts 2019$ 3,277,767 $ 1,461,884 $ 1,815,882 $ 6,555,533 South Central Light Rail: Fixed guideway corridor - South Valley Metro Washington Ave to Central - Non-Prior Rights Utility 5309-New Rail Baseline Rd VMR20-717T ----- Relocation 2020 Starts 2019$ 10,006,883 $ 4,463,070 $ 5,543,812 $ 20,013,765 South Central Light Rail: Valley Metro Washington Ave to Fixed guideway corridor - South 5309-New Rail Baseline Rd VMR20-718T ----- Central - Private Utility Relocation 2020 Starts 2019$ 5,337,005 $ 2,380,304 $ 2,956,701 $ 10,674,010 South Central Light Rail: Valley Metro Washington Ave to Fixed guideway corridor - South 5309-New Rail Baseline Rd VMR20-719T ----- Central - Right-of-way Acquisition 2020 Starts 2019$ 5,948,368 $ 2,652,972 $ 3,295,395 $ 11,896,735 5309-New Starts subtotal $ 24,570,023 $ 10,958,230 $ 13,611,790 $ 49,140,043

Agency Location TIP ID TRACS / ALIWork Work Funding Apportion Federal Regional Local Total Year ment Year City of Glendale: Operating; Glendale Various (Regionwide) GLN20-810T 30.09.01 Vouchers 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 180,000

Page 2 of 7 FY 2019 Transit Program of Projects 8/30/2019

FY 2019 TRANSIT PROGRAM OF PROJECTS (POP) Regional Council Approval: pending September 25, 2019 Agency Location TIP ID TRACS / ALIWork Work Funding Apportion Federal Regional Local Total Year ment Year ACCEL: Vehicle Replacements; (3) MAG Various (Regionwide) PNP20-801T 11.12.04 Raised Roof Van With Lift 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 178,500 $ 31,500 $ 210,000 ACCEL: Vehicle Expansion; (1) MAG Various (Regionwide) PNP20-802T 11.13.04 Raised Roof Van With Lift 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 59,500 $ 10,500 $ 70,000 AZ Spinal Cord Injury Association: Vehicle Expansion; (2) Minivan MAG Various (Regionwide) PNP20-803T 11.13.04 With Ramp 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 85,000 $ 15,000 $ 100,000

Beacon Group: Vehicle Expansion; MAG Various (Regionwide) PNP20-804T 11.13.04 (2) Minivan With Ramp 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 85,000 $ 15,000 $ 100,000

Benevilla: Vehicle Replacement; MAG Various (Regionwide) PNP20-805T 11.12.04 (1) Cutaway With Lift 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 59,500 $ 10,500 $ 70,000 Benevilla: Preventative MAG Various (Regionwide) PNP20-806T 11.7A.00 Maintenance 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 11,600 $ 2,900 $ 14,500 Chandler Gilbert Arc: Vehicle Replacement; (1) Cutaway With MAG Various (Regionwide) PNP20-807T 11.12.04 Lift 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 59,500 $ 10,500 $ 70,000 Chandler Gilbert Arc: Mobility MAG Various (Regionwide) PNP20-808T 11.7L.00 Management Position 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 36,000 $ 9,000 $ 45,000 Chandler Gilbert Arc: Preventative MAG Various (Regionwide) PNP20-809T 11.7A.00 Maintenance 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 27,763 $ 6,941 $ 34,704 Civitan Foundation: Vehicle Replacement; (1) Minivan No Ramp and (1) Passenger Van No MAG Various (Regionwide) PNP20-814T 11.12.04 Lift 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 46,400 $ 11,600 $ 58,000 Civitan Foundation: Vehicle Expansion; (2) Passenger Van No MAG Various (Regionwide) PNP20-815T 11.13.04 Lift 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 48,000 $ 12,000 $ 60,000 Daring Adventures: Vehicle MAG Various (Regionwide) PNP20-816T 11.13.04 Expansion; (1) Cutaway With Lift 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 59,500 $ 10,500 $ 70,000 Foothills Caring Corps: MAG Various (Regionwide) PNP20-817T 11.7A.00 Preventative Maintenance 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 8,286 $ 2,071 $ 10,357

Foothills Caring Corps: Operating; MAG Various (Regionwide) PNP20-818T 30.09.01 Volunteer Driving Program 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 33,680 $ 33,680 $ 67,360 Gompers: Preventative MAG Various (Regionwide) PNP20-819T 11.7A.00 Maintenance 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 42,134 $ 10,533 $ 52,667 Gompers: Mobility Management MAG Various (Regionwide) PNP20-820T 11.7L.00 Position 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 36,000 $ 9,000 $ 45,000

Page 3 of 7 FY 2019 Transit Program of Projects 8/30/2019

FY 2019 TRANSIT PROGRAM OF PROJECTS (POP) Regional Council Approval: pending September 25, 2019 Agency Location TIP ID TRACS / ALIWork Work Funding Apportion Federal Regional Local Total Year ment Year Independence Plus: Vehicle Expansion; (1) Raised Roof With MAG Various (Regionwide) PNP20-821T 11.13.04 Lift 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 59,500 $ 10,500 $ 70,000 Lifewell: Vehicle Replacement; (3) Passenger Van No Lift and (2) MAG Various (Regionwide) PNP20-822T 11.12.04 Minivan No Ramp 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 116,800 $ 29,200 $ 146,000 Lifewell: Mobility Management MAG Various (Regionwide) PNP20-823T 11.7L.00 Position 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 36,000 $ 9,000 $ 45,000 NAU: Operating; Volunteer Driving MAG Various (Regionwide) PNP20-824T 30.09.01 Program 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 124,945 $ 124,945 $ 249,890 Nobody's Perfect: Vehicle Replacement; (3) Minivan No MAG Various (Regionwide) PNP20-825T 11.12.04 Ramp 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 67,200 $ 16,800 $ 84,000 Northwest Valley Connect: Vehicle Replacement; (1) Cutaway with MAG Various (Regionwide) PNP20-826T 11.12.04 Lift 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 59,500 $ 10,500 $ 70,000 STARS: Vehicle Replacement; (2) MAG Various (Regionwide) PNP20-827T 11.12.04 Raised Roof Van With Lift 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 119,000 $ 21,000 $ 140,000

MAG Various (Regionwide) PNP20-828T 11.7A.00 STARS: Preventative Maintenance 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 15,757 $ 3,939 $ 19,696 STARS: Mobility Management MAG Various (Regionwide) PNP20-829T 11.7L.00 Position 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 36,000 $ 9,000 $ 45,000

The Center for Habilitation: Vehicle Replacement; (1) Cutaway, (3) Minivan With Ramp, and (1) MAG Various (Regionwide) PNP20-830T 11.12.04 Passenger Van No Lift 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 211,000 $ 39,000 $ 250,000 The Opportunity Tree: Vehicle Replacement; (1) Minivan With MAG Various (Regionwide) PNP20-831T 11.12.04 Ramp and (1) Cutaway 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 102,000 $ 18,000 $ 120,000

The Opportunity Tree: Vehicle MAG Various (Regionwide) PNP20-832T 11.13.04 Expansion; (1) Minivan With Ramp 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 42,500 $ 7,500 $ 50,000

VALLEYLIFE: Vehicle Replacement; (1) Raised Roof With Lift and (1) MAG Various (Regionwide) PNP20-835T 11.12.04 Passenger Van No Lift 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 83,500 $ 16,500 $ 100,000 YMCA: Operating; Volunteer MAG Various (Regionwide) PNP20-836T 30.09.01 Driving Program 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 11,000 $ 11,000 $ 22,000 City of Phoenix: Program Phoenix Various (Regionwide) PHX20-813T 11.79.00 Administration Funds 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 310,012 $ - $ 310,012

Page 4 of 7 FY 2019 Transit Program of Projects 8/30/2019

FY 2019 TRANSIT PROGRAM OF PROJECTS (POP) Regional Council Approval: pending September 25, 2019 Agency Location TIP ID TRACS / ALIWork Work Funding Apportion Federal Regional Local Total Year ment Year City of Phoenix: Operating; Phoenix Various (Regionwide) PHX20-812T 30.09.01 Vouchers 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 500,000 City of Tolleson: Vehicle Replacement; (1) Cutaway With Tolleson Various (Regionwide) TOL20-813T 11.12.04 Lift 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 59,500 $ 10,500 $ 70,000 Valley Valley Metro-RPTA: Operating; Metro/RPTA Various (Regionwide) VMT20-833T 30.09.01 Other 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 672,000 $ 672,000 $ 1,344,000 Valley Metro/RPTA Various (Regionwide) VMT20-834T 30.09.01 Valley Metro-RPTA: Travel Training 2020 5310-MAG 2019$ 104,000 $ 26,000 $ 130,000 5310-MAG subtotal $ 3,446,577 $ - $ 1,576,609 $ 5,023,186

Agency Location TIP ID TRACS / ALIWork Work Funding Apportion Federal Regional Local Total Year ment Year Phoenix Regionwide PHX20-808T 11.7A.00 Preventive Maintenance 2020 5337-HI AVN 2019 $ 78,995 $ 19,749 $ - $ 98,744 5337-HI-AVN subtotal $ 78,995 $ 19,749 $ - $ 98,744

Agency Location TIP ID TRACS / ALIWork Work Funding Apportion Federal Regional Local Total Year ment Year Phoenix Regionwide PHX20-705T 11.12.01 Purchase bus: 40 foot - 8 replace 2020 5337-HI 2019 $ 4,080,000 $ 720,000 $ 4,800,000 Phoenix Regionwide PHX20-810T 11.7A.00 Preventive Maintenance 2020 5337-HI 2019 $ 20,503 $ 5,126 $ - $ 25,629 5337-HI subtotal $ 4,100,503 $ 725,126 $ - $ 4,825,629

Agency Location TIP ID TRACS / ALIWork Work Funding Apportion Federal Regional Local Total Year ment Year Phoenix Regionwide VMR18-413T 12.42.20 Fare Collection System 2020 5337-FGM 2019 $ 344,346 $ 86,087 $ - $ 430,433 Phoenix Regionwide VMR20-707T 12.42.20 Fare Collection System 2020 5337-FGM 2019 $ 465,920 $ 116,480 $ - $ 582,400 Phoenix Regionwide VMR20-708T 12.42.20 Fare Collection System 2020 5337-FGM 2019 $ 228,266 $ 57,067 $ - $ 285,333 Phoenix Regionwide VMR20-709T 12.42.20 Fare Collection System 2020 5337-FGM 2019 $ 477,277 $ 119,320 $ 596,597 Phoenix Regionwide VMR20-710T 12.42.20 Fare Collection System 2020 5337-FGM 2019 $ 96,000 $ 24,000 $ - $ 120,000 Phoenix Regionwide VMR20-711T 12.42.20 Fare Collection System 2020 5337-FGM 2019 $ 513,066 $ 128,267 $ - $ 641,333 Phoenix Regionwide VMR20-712T 12.42.20 Fare Collection System 2020 5337-FGM 2019 $ 282,666 $ 70,667 $ - $ 353,333 Phoenix Regionwide VMR20-713T 12.42.20 Fare Collection System 2020 5337-FGM 2019 $ 465,920 $ 116,480 $ - $ 582,400 Phoenix Regionwide VMR20-714T 12.42.20 Fare Collection System 2020 5337-FGM 2019 $ 688,690 $ 172,173 $ - $ 860,863 Phoenix Regionwide VMR20-715T 12.42.20 Fare Collection System 2020 5337-FGM 2019 $ 543,580 $ 135,895 $ - $ 679,475 5337-FGM subtotal $ 4,105,731 $ 1,026,436 $ - $ 5,132,167

Page 5 of 7 FY 2019 Transit Program of Projects 8/30/2019

FY 2019 TRANSIT PROGRAM OF PROJECTS (POP) Regional Council Approval: pending September 25, 2019 Agency Location TIP ID TRACS / ALIWork Work Funding Apportion Federal Regional Local Total Year ment Year Agency Location TIP ID TRACS / ALIWork Work Funding Apportion Federal Regional Local Total Year ment Year Purchase bus: < 30 foot - 18 Phoenix Regionwide PHX20-703T 11.12.04 replace (dial-a-ride) 2020 5339 2019$ 1,094,923 $ 193,218 $ - $ 1,288,141 Purchase bus: < 30 foot - 4 replace Phoenix Regionwide PHX20-704T 11.12.04 (circulator) 2020 5339 2019$ 350,200 $ 61,800 $ - $ 412,000 Valley Purchase bus: Commuter - 5 Metro/RPTA Regionwide VMT20-706T 11.12.07 replace 2020 5339 2019$ 3,612,500 $ 637,500 $ 4,250,000 Valley Purchase bus: 30 foot - 1 replace Metro/RPTA Regionwide VMT20-707T 11.12.03 (Tempe) 2020 5339 2019$ 340,000 $ 60,000 $ 400,000 Phoenix Regionwide PHX20-807T 11.12.01 Purchase bus: 40 foot - 2 replace 2020 5339 2019 $ 909,500 $ 160,500 $ 1,070,000 5339 subtotal $ 6,307,123 $ 1,113,018 $ - $ 7,420,141

Agency Location TIP ID TRACS / ALIWork Work Funding Apportion Federal Regional Local Total Year ment Year Mesa Main Street: Valley Metro Mesa Dr to Gilbert Rd Rail LRT VMR19-102FZ Finance Charges 2018 CMAQ 2019$ 1,299,956 $ - $ 78,576 $ 1,378,532 Mesa Main Street: Valley Metro Mesa Dr to Gilbert Rd Rail LRT VMR19-102PFZ2 Design/ Professional Services 2018 CMAQ 2019$ 2,637,344 $ - $ 159,416 $ 2,796,760 Mesa Main Street: Valley Metro Mesa Dr to Gilbert Rd Construct Guideway and Track Rail LRT VMR21-102GTEZ Elements 2018 CMAQ 2019$ 949,983 $ - $ 57,422 $ 1,007,405 Mesa Main Street: Valley Metro Mesa Dr to Gilbert Rd Construct Guideway and Track Rail LRT VMR21-102GTEZ2 Elements 2018 CMAQ 2019$ 3,918,744 $ - $ 236,870 $ 4,155,614 Mesa Main Street: Valley Metro Mesa Dr to Gilbert Rd Rail LRT VMR19-102PFZ3 "Design/Professional Services" 2022 CMAQ 2019$ 439,304 $ - $ 26,554 $ 465,858 CMAQ subtotal $ 9,245,331 $ - $ 558,838 $ 9,804,169

Agency Location TIP ID TRACS / ALIWork Work Funding Apportion Federal Regional Local Total Year ment Year Mesa Main Street: Valley Metro Mesa Dr to Gilbert Rd Construct Guideway and Track Rail LRT VMR22-102GTEZ Elements 2019 STBGP-MAG 2019$ 5,392,013 $ - $ 325,922 $ 5,717,935 STBGP-MAG subtotal $ 5,392,013 $ - $ 325,922 $ 5,717,935

Page 6 of 7 FY 2019 Transit Program of Projects 8/30/2019

FY 2019 TRANSIT PROGRAM OF PROJECTS (POP) Regional Council Approval: pending September 25, 2019 Agency Location TIP ID TRACS / ALIWork Work Funding Apportion Federal Regional Local Total Year ment Year

Agency Location TIP ID TRACS / ALIWork Work Funding Apportion Federal Regional Local Total Year ment Year Fixed guideway corridor - Capitol/I- Valley Metro 10 West Phase I - Non-Prior Rights Rail I-10 WEST Phoenix VMR18-425T Utility Relocation 2021 STBGP-Flex 2019$ 5,528,114 $ 1,382,029 $ - $ 6,910,143 Valley Metro Operations and Rail Maintenance Center VMR20-801T OMC Expansion - Construction 2020 STBGP-Flex 2019$ 5,923,081 $ 358,023 $ - $ 6,281,104 Valley Metro Purchase Light Rail Vehicles: 8 Rail Regionwide VMR20-802T Expansion 2020 STBGP-Flex 2019$ 12,168,747 $ 3,042,187 $ - $ 15,210,934 STBGP-Flex subtotal $ 23,619,942 $ 4,782,239 $ - $ 28,402,181

Agency Location TIP ID TRACS / ALIWork Work Funding Apportion Federal Regional Local Total Year ment Year STBGP-AZ- MAG Regionwide MAG20-705T Preventive Maintenance 2020 Flex 2019$ 29,310 $ - $ 7,328 $ 36,638 Valley STBGP-AZ- Metro/RPTA Regionwide VMT20-704T Purchase vanpools: 5 expand 2020 Flex 2019$ 232,500 $ - $ - $ 232,500 Valley STBGP-AZ- Metro/RPTA Regionwide VMT20-710T Purchase vanpools: 20 expand 2020 Flex 2019$ 930,000 $ - $ - $ 930,000 Valley STBGP-AZ- Metro/RPTA Regionwide VMT20-711T Purchase vanpools: 45 replace 2020 Flex 2019$ 2,092,500 $ - $ - $ 2,092,500 STBGP-AZ-Flex subtotal $ 3,284,310 $ - $ 7,328 $ 3,291,638

FY 2019 POP Total $ 115,985,515 $ 23,566,546 $ 19,811,750 $ 159,363,811

Page 7 of 7