Whitaker Calendars
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2012 Rsa Conference Program Thursday, May 24, 2012
2012 RSA CONFERENCE PROGRAM Loews Hotel 1200 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19107 215 627.1200 • Session Locations: All sessions will be held in the Loews Hotel, except the five sessions designated for off-site venues • AV: An asterisk* denotes rooms with AV facilities; these requests will be confirmed in April. • Chair Duties: Chairs should (a) make introductions and (b) enforce time limits • Paper Time Limits: 3-paper panels = 20 minutes each; 4-paper panels = 15 minutes each; Roundtables = adjust accordingly, allowing time for discussion. It’s professional courtesy to abide by these limits. [Add Awards page] THURSDAY, MAY 24, 2012 8:00-5:00 ASHR MEETING (Dave Tell, Commonwealth C) Noon-5:00* CAREER RETREAT MEETING (Cheryl Geisler, Commonwealth B) Noon-5:00 ARST MEETING (Lisa Keranen, Commonwealth D) FRIDAY, MAY 25, 2012 8:00 am – 10:00 pm REGISTRATION (Millenium Foyer) 8:00-noon CAREER RETREAT MEETING (Cheryl Geisler, Commonwealth B) 8:00-noon ASHR MEETING (Dave Tell, Commonwealth C) 8:00-noon ARST MEETING (Lisa Keranen, Commonwealth D) 8:45-noon RSA BOARD BUFFET BREAKFAST & BOARD MEETING (Kris Ratcliffe, Howe) 9:30 – 10:45 FRIDAY “A” SESSIONS A01 RECOGNIZING IMMAPPANCY IN THE READING, WRITING, AND TEACHING OF RHETORIC (Washington A) A Brief History of Map Rhetoric, or, Defining Immappancy Samantha NeCamp, Midway College Immappancy in Rhetoric and Composition: Tracing Spatial Metaphors through Contemporary Scholarship Lisa Arnold, American U Spatial Metaphors and Translingual Pedagogies: Placing Ourselves in the Curriculum Vanessa -
Dead Precedents Riley T
Notre Dame Law Review Online Volume 93 | Issue 1 Article 1 8-2017 Dead Precedents Riley T. Svikhart Notre Dame Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr_online Part of the Jurisprudence Commons, and the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Recommended Citation 93 Notre Dame L. Rev. Online 1 (2018) This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by the Notre Dame Law Review at NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Law Review Online by an authorized editor of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ESSAY DEAD PRECEDENTS Riley T. Svikhart* INTRODUCTION Shaun McCutcheon’s was the “next big campaign finance case to go before the Supreme Court.”1 When the Alabama GOP warned the conservative businessman that his 2010 federal campaign contributions might soon exceed a congressionally imposed limit, he decided to “take a stand.”2 Together, McCutcheon and the Republican National Committee (RNC)—which “wish[ed] to receive the contributions that McCutcheon and similarly situated individuals would like to make” in the absence of such aggregate contribution limits3—challenged the responsible statutory regime4 on First Amendment grounds and attracted national attention en route to a victory before the Supreme Court.5 But while McCutcheon and the RNC prevailed in their case, they failed in another noteworthy regard—Chief Justice Roberts’s controlling opinion declined their request to squarely overrule a relevant portion of the landmark campaign © 2017 Riley T. Svikhart. Individuals and nonprofit institutions may reproduce and distribute copies of this Essay in any format, at or below cost, for educational purposes, so long as each copy identifies the author, provides a citation to the Notre Dame Law Review Online, and includes this provision and copyright notice. -
Without Justice: Trump’S Across-The-Board Assault on Civil and Human Rights
Without Justice: Trump’s Across-the-Board Assault on Civil and Human Rights Civil Rights Monitor January 2018, Volume 27 Acknowledgements Principal Author: Patrick McNeil Contributing Editors: Allyn Brooks-LaSure, Tyler Lewis, Kristine Lucius, Seema Nanda, Corrine Yu Layout & Design: Alicia Smith The Leadership Conference Education Fund Board: William Robinson (Chair), Carolyn Osolinik (Secretary/ Treasurer), Mary Frances Berry, Deepak Bhargava, Elizabeth Birch, Mike Calhoun, Richard Cohen, Gara LaMarche, Judith Lichtman, John Relman The Leadership Conference Education Fund is a 501(c) (3) organization that builds public will for federal policies that promote and protect the civil and human rights of all persons in the United States. In 1982, the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights (now The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, our sister organization) published a report, “Without Justice,” documenting the Justice Department’s attacks on civil rights during the first year of Ronald Reagan’s presidency. Thirty-five years later, the title of this report recalls that dark moment in our nation’s history and reminds us that civil rights progress in the United States has never been linear. Our country emerged from that time of retrenchment – and we will again. Access this material online at leadershipconferenceedfund.org. Table of Contents 1 Introduction 2 The Trump Administration’s Attacks on Civil and Human Rights 8 Congress’ Actions to Undo Civil Rights 10 The Federal Courts 12 Moving Forward 13 Appendix Introduction Vanita Gupta In August 2017, the nation witnessed horrifying acts of a formal and ongoing commitment to defend the civil white supremacy, violent extremism, and domestic ter- rights of all people in this nation. -
Write-Ins Race/Name Totals - General Election 11/03/20 11/10/2020
Write-Ins Race/Name Totals - General Election 11/03/20 11/10/2020 President/Vice President Phillip M Chesion / Cobie J Chesion 1 1 U/S. Gubbard 1 Adebude Eastman 1 Al Gore 1 Alexandria Cortez 2 Allan Roger Mulally former CEO Ford 1 Allen Bouska 1 Andrew Cuomo 2 Andrew Cuomo / Andrew Cuomo 1 Andrew Cuomo, NY / Dr. Anthony Fauci, Washington D.C. 1 Andrew Yang 14 Andrew Yang Morgan Freeman 1 Andrew Yang / Joe Biden 1 Andrew Yang/Amy Klobuchar 1 Andrew Yang/Jeremy Cohen 1 Anthony Fauci 3 Anyone/Else 1 AOC/Princess Nokia 1 Ashlie Kashl Adam Mathey 1 Barack Obama/Michelle Obama 1 Ben Carson Mitt Romney 1 Ben Carson Sr. 1 Ben Sass 1 Ben Sasse 6 Ben Sasse senator-Nebraska Laurel Cruse 1 Ben Sasse/Blank 1 Ben Shapiro 1 Bernard Sanders 1 Bernie Sanders 22 Bernie Sanders / Alexandria Ocasio Cortez 1 Bernie Sanders / Elizabeth Warren 2 Bernie Sanders / Kamala Harris 1 Bernie Sanders Joe Biden 1 Bernie Sanders Kamala D. Harris 1 Bernie Sanders/ Kamala Harris 1 Bernie Sanders/Andrew Yang 1 Bernie Sanders/Kamala D. Harris 2 Bernie Sanders/Kamala Harris 2 Blain Botsford Nick Honken 1 Blank 7 Blank/Blank 1 Bobby Estelle Bones 1 Bran Carroll 1 Brandon A Laetare 1 Brian Carroll Amar Patel 1 Page 1 of 142 President/Vice President Brian Bockenstedt 1 Brian Carol/Amar Patel 1 Brian Carrol Amar Patel 1 Brian Carroll 2 Brian carroll Ammor Patel 1 Brian Carroll Amor Patel 2 Brian Carroll / Amar Patel 3 Brian Carroll/Ama Patel 1 Brian Carroll/Amar Patel 25 Brian Carroll/Joshua Perkins 1 Brian T Carroll 1 Brian T. -
Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2020 Remarks in a Meeting With
Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2020 Remarks in a Meeting With African American Leaders and an Exchange With Reporters February 27, 2020 The President. Well, I want to thank you very much. We're here with some of the Black leaders of our country and people that are highly respected and people that have done a fantastic job and, for the most part, have been working on this whole situation with me right from the beginning. Participants. Yes. Yes. The President. And we've done a lot. We've done Opportunity Zones. We've done criminal justice reform. We've done things that people didn't even think possible. Criminal justice reform—we've let a lot of great people out of jail. Participants. Yes! [Applause] The President. And you know, Alice Johnson is, really, just such a great example. A fine woman. And she doesn't say she didn't do it; she made a mistake. But she was in there for 22 years when we let her out, and she had practically another 20 left. Participant. She did. The President. And that's not appropriate. Alveda King Ministries Founder Alveda C. King. Her children grew up, her grandbabies. The President. Yes, I know. So incredible. And you couldn't produce—there's nobody is Hollywood that could have produced that last scene of her. Ms. King. Amen. Amazing. The President. That was the real deal—of her when she saw her kids. So it's really a fantastic thing. So what I think I do is I'd like to—for the media, I'd like to go around the room, and we can do just a quick introduction of each other. -
Center Co-Sponsors Panel at the United States Supreme Court
New Jackson Center Online Sites Become a Jackson Center Fan on The Jackson Center on YouTube U P C O M I N G July 18–23 august 25 EVENTS A Special Studies lecture series week Professor John Q. Barrett of St. John’s Facebook.com at Chautauqua Institution regarding University, the Jackson Center’s Created just over a year ago, the “RobertHJacksonCenter” april 27 the legacy of Justice Jackson and the Elizabeth S. Lenna Fellow, will The Jackson Center is now on Facebook.com! By becoming channel on YouTube.com has already received over 350,000 In conjunction with a visit by Gail Nuremberg trials. lecture at Chautauqua Institution on a member of the “Robert H. Jackson Center” fan page on views. An ever-expanding free resource for video content Jarrow, award-winning author of “Chautauqua’s Robert H. Jackson.” Facebook, you can access a wide spectrum of interesting related to Jackson, Nuremberg, and Center events, this channel the Jackson biography, ROBERT H. august 18 CENTER items and information regarding contains a wealth of information JACKSON: New Deal Lawyer, Supreme Chautauqua Institution’s 6th annual august 30–31 SPRING 2010 • www.roberthjackson.org upcoming events, updates to our that can be easily searched and Court Justice, Nuremberg Prosecutor, a Robert H. Jackson Lecture on the The 4th Annual International website, photos of Jackson and the viewed from anywhere. Part of the short film on Jackson and Brown v. Supreme Court of the United States will Humanitarian Law Dialogs will Center, and albums of previous Jackson Center’s continuing effort Board of Education will be shown at the be given by Jeff Shesol (www.shesol.com). -
2017-2018 Annual Report 2017-2018 View
Founded in 1940, the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) is the nation’s first civil and human rights law organization and has been completely separate from the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) since 1957. From that era to the present, LDF’s mission has always been transformative: to achieve racial justice, equality, and an inclusive society. Photo: LDF Founder Thurgood Marshall contents 02 Message from the Chairs of the Board, Gerald S. Adolph and David W. Mills 04 Message from Sherrilyn Ifill, President and Director-Counsel 07 Litigation 10 A. Education 14 B. Political Participation 18 C. Criminal Justice 22 D. Economic Justice 26 E. Equal Justice 28 F. Supreme Court Advocacy 30 Policy and Advocacy 34 Thurgood Marshall Institute (TMI) 40 LDF in the Media 44 Fellowship and Scholarship Programs 48 Special Events 51 Supporters 61 Financial Report 64 Board of Directors We are proud to say that despite these Gerald S. Adolph mounting threats, LDF remains equal to the task. This annual report is a testament to LDF’s remarkable success in and out of the courtroom. David W. Mills 1 message from the chairs of the board In 1978, LDF’s founder Thurgood Marshall said, “Where you see wrong or inequality or injustice, speak out, because this is your country. This is your democracy. Make it. Protect it. Pass it on.” The NAACP Legal Defense Fund has been pursuing that mission since its founding. Through litigation and advocacy, LDF works to protect and preserve our democracy, so that its promises of liberty and justice can at last be made real for all Americans. -
Date Record Requested Agency 1 3/16/2018 All Communications In
Date Record Requested Agency All communications in your possession, of any type whatsoever, regarding Donald Trump’s dining plan 1 3/16/2018 including budgets for the White House kitchen, meal plans, or any dietary preferences expressed by Executive Office of the President the President All communications in your possession, of any type whatsoever, regarding Donald Trump’s dining plan U.S. Executive Office of the 2 3/16/2018 including budgets for the White House kitchen, meal plans, or any dietary preferences expressed by President the President All communications in your possession, of any type whatsoever, regarding payments to Benjamin S. U.S. Department of Housing and 3 3/16/2018 Carson Jr. Urban Development All communications in your possession, of any type whatsoever, regarding payments to individuals or U.S. Department of Homeland 4 3/16/2018 organizations in Syria from Jan 20, 2017 to present Security All communications in your possession, of any type whatsoever, regarding the travel expenditures of all Environmental Protection 5 3/16/2018 agency political appointees confirmed by the Senate Agency All communications in your possession, of any type whatsoever, regarding the travel expenditures of all Office of Management and 6 3/16/2018 agency political appointees confirmed by the Senate Budget All communications in your possession, of any type whatsoever, regarding the travel expenditures of all Office of National Drug Control 7 3/16/2018 agency political appointees confirmed by the Senate Policy All communications in your possession, of any type whatsoever, regarding the travel expenditures of all Office of the United States Trade 8 3/16/2018 agency political appointees confirmed by the Senate Representative All communications in your possession, of any type whatsoever, regarding the travel expenditures of all 9 3/16/2018 Small Business Administration agency political appointees confirmed by the Senate All communications in your possession, of any type whatsoever, regarding the travel expenditures of all 10 3/16/2018 U.S. -
November 8, 2017 United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary
November 8, 2017 United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Dear Chairman Grassley, Ranking Member Feinstein, and Committee Members: On behalf of the hundreds of thousands of members of People For the American Way, I write in opposition to the nomination of Brett Talley to a seat on the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama. Talley’s scant record as a practicing lawyer coupled with serious questions about his objectivity and fairness with respect to core constitutional questions, argue against his confirmation for a lifetime seat on the federal bench. The ABA generally considers 12 years of experience actually practicing law, with substantial trial experience, to be a minimal qualification for a judge. Talley has not even been out of law school that long. Since graduating in 2007, Talley has had only three years of experience as a practicing attorney:i as a junior associate at a Washington, D.C. law firm from 2007-2008, then as Alabama's deputy solicitor general from 2015-2017. Talley has never himself tried a case but is nominated to be a trial court judge.ii As his responses to Ranking Member Feinstein and Senator Coons attest, he has precious little leadership experience in a variety of courtroom arenas.iii In particular, he has never argued any motion under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, presented argument in federal district court on an evidentiary issued governed by the Federal Rules of Evidence, has only taken one deposition in a federal court proceeding (and that was DC Superior Court), has never argued a discovery motion in federal district court, has never examined a fact witness in federal district court, and has never examined an expert witness in federal district court. -
President Trump Domestic Policy
President Trump Domestic Policy Yielding and nosed Silvan always slay scarce and assays his sciosophies. Vexing Gay chelating effetely, he laagers his dieticians very impecuniously. Navicular Wainwright misrelated cognizably. Do prominent Republicans break as the president in any object of light way through policy coverage otherwise If things break bad when Trump also can. Get that domestic policy, president for every email from academia, trump administration had been saying for policy tiles below. Health care sector; create a conducive environment for infrastructure development; upgrade living standard in America through state welfare strategies; and his propose comprehensive plan to block the hand of immigrants in America. Changes would be. Presidents have leeway to reach military and domestic purposes. Trump and Putin at the Helsinki summit. Browse the latest Alabama celebrations submitted by readers, find additional stories celebrating life throughout Alabama and implement how you can submit our own celebrations events for publication on AL. Susan Rice to direct Biden's White north Domestic Policy. Constitution instead of controlling it. The withdrawal which faced domestic and international opposition comes six. Signed an entire relationship is. Trump's strategy in Venezuela Domestic than foreign policy. There has been a president talked about trump promised has been slashed. Republicans have added to domestic manufacturing for. Ivanka trump domestic policy that employers may take regulatory policy staff changes at al weather updates on illegal or other officials. Joe Grogan director of man Domestic legal Council called California occupied territory in a tweet touting President Donald Trump's ally to the. New eBook Economics and policy gap the heal of Trump VOX. -
13 Troubling Judicial Nominees You Missed This Year by Tony Hanna and Abbey Meller December 20, 2018
13 Troubling Judicial Nominees You Missed This Year By Tony Hanna and Abbey Meller December 20, 2018 The bitter nomination process involving now-U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, which culminated in a contested confirmation vote on October 6, brought the importance of the federal judiciary to the forefront of American politi- cal consciousness. Around the country, tens of thousands of people rallied to protest the influence and effects of the judicial system on issues affecting everyone: health care reproductive rights, civil rights, disability justice, gun violence prevention, and more.1 Although Senate Republican leaders worked hard to shield Kavanaugh’s record from public oversight, hundreds of brave people risked arrest to protest both outside and inside Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearing and, later, at the sham hear- ing2 to investigate the legitimate claim of sexual assault made against Kavanaugh by Christine Blasey Ford. Yet, while concerned citizens were rightfully paying attention to the important debate taking place over the future of the U.S. Supreme Court, the Trump administration and its allies in the Senate were also busy reshaping the lower federal courts. This year, the Senate confirmed a record 65 lower court judges3 to lifetime seats on the federal judiciary. An additional 67 judicial nominees are currently pending Senate action;4 the Senate could still vote on these nominations before the end of the year. In short, the Trump administration and its allies in the Senate are working at a breakneck pace to turn the federal courts into a hyper-conservative body that will implement a partisan political agenda from the bench. -
Oral Argument - Advocates
Oral Argument - Advocates Overview Most Popular Advocate Origins OT12 OT13 OT14 OT15 OT16 OT17 OT18 OT19 State Total Number of Washington, D.C. 103 Different 120 121 112 117 100 113 122 103 California 8 Advocates New York 7 Number of Total 193 185 178 186 158 163 178 155 Texas 5 Appearances Virginia 5 Appearances by Advocates OT12 OT13 OT14 OT15 OT16 OT17 OT18 OT19 Who... Most Popular Supreme Court Clerkships …Are from the Clerkship Appearances Advocates Office of the 64 (33%) 61 (33%) 56 (31%) 59 (32%) 48 (30%) 48 (29%) 50 (28%) 42 (27%) Solicitor General Antonin Scalia 25 10 …Have John G. Roberts 17 8 experience in the Not 85 (47%) 78 (46%) 84 (71%) 73 (48%) 71 (65%) 86 (48%) 80 (52%) Ruth Bader Ginsburg 7 6 Office of the Available Stephen Breyer 7 4 Solicitor General Elena Kagan 6 4 …Have argued at least twice during 104 (54%) 96 (52%) 104 (58%) 109 (59%) 94 (59%) 77 (47%) 87 (49%) 82 (53%) David Souter 5 4 the Term …Are “expert” Supreme Court 137 (71%) 131 (71%) 116 (66%) 136 (74%) 115 (74%) 89 (56%) 123 (69%) 114 (74%) Most Popular Law Schools litigators* …Are based in Law School Appearances Advocates Washington, 125 (65%) 119 (64%) 101 (57%) 122 (66%) 97 (61%) 97 (60%) 109 (61%) 103 (66%) Harvard 41 33 D.C.** Yale 32 20 …Are female 33 (17%) 28 (15%) 34 (19%) 32 (18%) 33 (21%) 19 (12%) 30 (17%) 20 (13%) Chicago 12 2 Stanford 10 6 …Are female and Virginia 9 6 not from the Office of the 17 (13%) 11 (9%) 17 (14%) 13 (10%) 15 (14%) 10 (9%) 21 (12%) 13 (8%) Solicitor General*** * We adopt Richard Lazarus’ definition of an “expert” Supreme Court litigator: one who has argued five or more times before the Supreme Court or works in an office where lawyers have collectively argued more than 10 times.