HANDBOOK for JOURNAL EDITORS | 2018 Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

HANDBOOK for JOURNAL EDITORS | 2018 Contents Handbook for JPPS JPPS JPPS WORKING TOWARDS I N E JPPS A Journal Editors C T I V N E W STARS ABOUT INASP ABOUT THE JOURNALS ABOUT THIS RESOURCE ONLINE PROJECT Founded in 1992, INASP is an This pack includes hand-outs used international development The Journals Online (JOL) project by INASP during workshops and organization working with a global was established by INASP in adapted for a broader audience. network of partners in Africa, Latin the late 1990s to redress the They are intended as guidelines America and Asia. In line with the challenges discussed here. The on good practice, and as ideas for vision of research and knowledge Journals Online platforms aim journals to consider. at the heart of development, INASP to provide increased visibility, works to support individuals and accessibility and quality of peer- The pack does not represent institutions to produce, share and reviewed journals published in a comprehensive information use research and knowledge, which developing countries so that the resource on journal publishing, can transform lives. research outputs that are produced but presents some of the issues in these countries can be found, that a journal publisher and editor INASP’s approaches are based shared and used more effectively. needs to consider and which may on the core pillars of capacity be helpful when developing a development, convening, The JOL project involves embedding publication. influencing and working in an online journal hosting partnership. INASP promotes platform in existing institutions in Pippa Smart equity by actively addressing developing countries or regions. It | Editor the needs of both men and then provides training in publishing Alastair Horne | Contributor women across all our work and best practices, and various addressing issues of power within other supporting services to the INASP TEAM the research and knowledge participating research journals system. INASP has projects in 28 hosted on the platforms. Sioux Cumming | INASP countries, supporting all aspects of Siân Harris | INASP research and knowledge systems, The project strengthens the from facilitating the provision capacity in the local hosting of information to researchers to organization to eventually helping parliamentarians and sustainably undertake this ongoing civil servants to use research and work themselves. In many cases, evidence in policy making. the JOL platform provides a first opportunity for the research in a journal to be made available online. The first JOL platform was African Journals Online (AJOL), established as a pilot in 1998 and formally launched in 2000. Since 2005, AJOL has been managed independently by a team in South Africa and the platform now hosts over 500 journals. JOL platforms in Vietnam and the Philippines are also now managed locally. The JOLs in Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Central America and Mongolia are also in the process of moving to local management. INASP, 2018. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- INASP Share Alike Licence (CC 2/3 Cambridge Terrace, BY-SA 4.0). Users can Oxford OX1 1RR, UK reproduce material from this toolkit for their own Tel:+44(0)1865 249909 training and publications Fax:+44(0)1865 251060 under the same conditions E-mail: [email protected] as the materials are made available. This work is funded by DFID and Sida www.inasp.info as part of INASP's Strengthening twitter.com/INASPinfo Charity No. 1106349 Research and Knowledge Systems facebook.com/inasp.info Company No. 04919576 (SRKS) programme. 3 www.inasp.info HANDBOOK FOR JOURNAL EDITORS | 2018 Contents INTRODUCTION 6 QUESTIONNAIRE 8 Section A: Editorial vision and processes 9 CHAPTER 1. EDITORIAL STRATEGY AND POLICIES 10 Online resources and references 10 Resource 1A: Developing a journal strategy 11 Resource 1B: Editorial policies 13 CHAPTER 2. EDITORIAL STRUCTURES 15 Online resources and references 15 Resource 2A: Editorial responsibilities 16 Resource 2B: Working with the editorial team 17 Resource 2C: The journal editor agreement 19 Resource 2D: Editorial boards – composition 21 CHAPTER 3. EDITORIAL OFFICE 22 Online resources and references 22 Resource 3A: The operation of the editorial office 23 CHAPTER 4. PUBLISHING REGULARITY 25 Online resources and references 25 Resource 4A: Scheduling for journal production 26 Section B: Content quality 31 CHAPTER 5. PUBLISHING QUANTITY/QUALITY 32 Online resources and references 32 Resource 5A: Strategies for attracting authors 33 Resource 5B: Strategies for dealing with uneven amounts of content 35 CHAPTER 6. AUTHOR SUPPORT 36 Online resources and references 37 Resource 6A: Working with authors – good practice 38 Resource 6B: Author guidelines 40 Resource 6C: The Publisher-Author Relationship 42 Resource 6D: How to publish your research work 46 CHAPTER 7. PEER REVIEW POLICIES 51 Online resources and references 52 Resource 7A: Different peer review methods 53 Resource 7B: Working with reviewers – good practice 55 CHAPTER 8. ADDING QUALITY TO ACCEPTED ARTICLES 57 Online resources and references 57 Resource 8A: Style and copyediting – adding value 58 Resource 8B: Copyediting – skills required and workflow 60 Resource 8C: Links and DOIs 62 CHAPTER 9. ETHICAL POLICIES 64 Online resources and references 65 Resource 9A: Ethical issues – what they are, how to deal with them 66 CHAPTER 10. COPYRIGHT POLICIES 69 Online resources and references 69 Resource 10A: JISC Copyright resource 70 Resource 10B: INASP Resource: Copyright Assignment Form 72 Resource 10C: Licence for publication instead of copyright assignment 74 4 www.inasp.info HANDBOOK FOR JOURNAL EDITORS | 2018 Section C: Presentation quality 75 CHAPTER 11. WEBSITE REQUIREMENTS 76 Online resources and references 77 Resource 11A: Planning online migration: Planning checklist 78 Resource 11B: Online publishing – different hosting opportunities 80 Resource 11C: Journal websites – essential elements 88 Resource 11D: Open-access journals – it’s not all about free 90 CHAPTER 12. PRINT JOURNAL REQUIREMENTS 95 Online resources and references 96 Resource 12A: Text type design: resource guide 97 Resource 12B: Journal design – guidelines 103 Section D: Journal sustainability 107 CHAPTER 13. SUSTAINABILITY AND PUBLISHING POLICIES 108 Online resources and references 108 Resource 13A: Journal finances and business management 109 Resource 13B: Evaluating your journal (key questions and indicators) 113 Resource 13C: Journal development – ideas 116 Resource 13D: Models for full-text journal online publishing 118 Section E: Journal promotion 123 CHAPTER 14. PROMOTIONAL STRATEGIES 124 Online resources and references 124 Resource 14A: Increasing visibility: promotional tactics 125 Resource 14B: General guidance for writing and presenting promotional copy 128 Resource 14C: Email marketing 130 Resource 14D: Social media promotion 132 Resource 14E: Indexing services 135 Resource 14F: Blogs 139 Resource 14G: Measurement 141 Resource 14H: Press Releases 144 Resource 14H: Scholarly research networks 146 5 www.inasp.info HANDBOOK FOR JOURNAL EDITORS | 2018 Introduction To maximize the outreach and impact of research it is important for journals to ensure that they provide suitable platforms for the dissemination of research information. For journals to publish to a poor standard not only harms the reputation of the authors, but it also performs a disservice to the area of research – and potentially to the region in which the journals publish. Journal editors and publishers therefore have a responsibility to ensure that they are providing a quality platform for the publication of research. The purpose of this handbook is to pose the questions that will help journals to judge their level of efficiency, sustainability and quality against internationally accepted criteria. Journal Publishing Practices and Standards One star – has New title - has been met the basic publishing for less than requirements for at two years, but meets JPPS N least two years E W basic requirements Two stars – Inactive - has not compliant with added new content I additional publishing N E to the JOL platform in JPPS A V practice quality criteria C T I over one year Three stars – No stars – not WORKIN consistently excellent TOWARDS currently meeting in all the technical and JPPS the basic criteria for JPPS STARS editorial publishing best inclusion on a JOL practices set out in the platform assessment criteria of the Journal Publishing Practices & Standards (JPPS) framework This handbook complements the Journal Publishing Practices and Standards (JPPS), which was announced by African Journals Online and INASP in 2017. Concerns are often raised about the perceived quality and transparency of publication processes for Southern journals. This, in turn, limits the perceived credibility of the research published within those journals. In response to these concerns, the Journal Publishing Practices and Standards (JPPS) framework provides detailed assessment criteria for the quality of publishing practices of Southern journals and is initially being used to assess the journals hosted on JOL platforms. Journals assessed against the JPPS criteria are given one of six levels: inactive title; new title; no stars; one star; two stars; and three stars. The assigned JPPS levels serve a dual purpose. For readers, they provide assurance that the journals meet an internationally recognized set of criteria at a particular level. For journal editors, the detailed feedback from the JPPS assessment helps them identify ways to improve their publishing practices and standards
Recommended publications
  • Open Access Availability of Scientific Publications
    Analytical Support for Bibliometrics Indicators Open access availability of scientific publications Analytical Support for Bibliometrics Indicators Open access availability of scientific publications* Final Report January 2018 By: Science-Metrix Inc. 1335 Mont-Royal E. ▪ Montréal ▪ Québec ▪ Canada ▪ H2J 1Y6 1.514.495.6505 ▪ 1.800.994.4761 [email protected] ▪ www.science-metrix.com *This work was funded by the National Science Foundation’s (NSF) National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES). Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of NCSES or the NSF. The analysis for this research was conducted by SRI International on behalf of NSF’s NCSES under contract number NSFDACS1063289. Analytical Support for Bibliometrics Indicators Open access availability of scientific publications Contents Contents .............................................................................................................................................................. i Tables ................................................................................................................................................................. ii Figures ................................................................................................................................................................ ii Abstract ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Software Technical Report
    A Technical History of the SEI Larry Druffel January 2017 SPECIAL REPORT CMU/SEI-2016-SR-027 SEI Director’s Office Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution is Unlimited http://www.sei.cmu.edu Copyright 2016 Carnegie Mellon University This material is based upon work funded and supported by the Department of Defense under Contract No. FA8721-05-C-0003 with Carnegie Mellon University for the operation of the Software Engineer- ing Institute, a federally funded research and development center. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Department of Defense. References herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trade mark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by Carnegie Mellon University or its Software Engineering Institute. This report was prepared for the SEI Administrative Agent AFLCMC/PZM 20 Schilling Circle, Bldg 1305, 3rd floor Hanscom AFB, MA 01731-2125 NO WARRANTY. THIS CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE MATERIAL IS FURNISHED ON AN “AS-IS” BASIS. CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY MAKES NO WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, AS TO ANY MATTER INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR PURPOSE OR MERCHANTABILITY, EXCLUSIVITY, OR RESULTS OBTAINED FROM USE OF THE MATERIAL. CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY DOES NOT MAKE ANY WARRANTY OF ANY KIND WITH RESPECT TO FREEDOM FROM PATENT, TRADEMARK, OR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT. [Distribution Statement A] This material has been approved for public release and unlimited distribu- tion.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Collections: Proposal and Guidelines for Potential Guest Editors Special Collections Are an Important Component of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine
    Special Collections: Proposal and Guidelines for Potential Guest Editors Special Collections are an important component of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine. They are an opportunity for the journal to cultivate a collection of articles around a specific topic, meeting/conference, or newsworthy development that falls within the scope of the journal. They should be organized by recognized experts in the area and attract articles of the highest quality. Special Collections are highlighted on the homepage for increased visibility and in most cases receive their own dedicated marketing efforts. Special Collections can be a continuously published section in a journal, or exist as a fixed set of articles. As the Guest Editor, you have the chance to shape the content, define the aims & scope of the collection, and collaborate with colleagues around a topic of particular interest to your personal research. Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine Aims and Scope Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine (GGM) is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed open access journal where scholars from a variety of disciplines present their work focusing on the psychological, behavioral, social, and biological aspects of aging, and public health services and research related to aging. The journal addresses a wide variety of topics related to health services research in gerontology and geriatrics. GGM seeks to be one of the world’s premier Open Access outlets for gerontological academic research. As such, GGM does not limit content due to page budgets or thematic significance. Papers will be subjected to rigorous peer review but will be selected solely on the basis of whether the research is sound and deserves publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Teachers and Research: an Annotated Bibliography. PUB DATE 1997-00-00 NOTE 11P.; In: Classroom Teachers and Classroom Research; See FL 024 999
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 415 703 FL 025 011 AUTHOR Griffee, Dale T. TITLE Teachers and Research: An Annotated Bibliography. PUB DATE 1997-00-00 NOTE 11p.; In: Classroom Teachers and Classroom Research; see FL 024 999. PUB TYPE Reference Materials Bibliographies (131) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Annotated Bibliographies; Book Reviews; *Classroom Research; Classroom Techniques; English (Second Language); Foreign Countries; Higher Education; *Information Sources; *Research Methodology; Second Language Instruction; Second Languages; Statistical Analysis; *Teacher Researchers; Teacher Role; *Writing for Publication ABSTRACT The annotated bibliography consists of reviews, of three to seven paragraphs each, of nine books focusing on classroom research and the teacher's role in conducting and publishing it. Eight of the books relate specifically to research on English-as-a-Second-Language teaching and learning. Each review provides basic bibliographic information, followed by four kinds of information about the text: the primary audience and purpose; its organization; features that are unusual or might be overlooked; and a brief summary. (MSE) *********k********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. ******************************************************************************** U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION "PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS Office of Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY CENTER (ERIC) tAi.c4ns document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization 1°--(\ originating it. Chapter 12 Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality. Points of view or opinions stated in this TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES document do not necessarily represent INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)." official OERI position or policy. Teachers and Research: O An Annotated Bibliography Dale T.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Science Inspired by Community Frontiersin.Org Frontiers Thanks Its 50’000+ Editorial Board Members
    2014 | PROGRESS REPORT Open science inspired by community frontiersin.org Frontiers thanks its 50’000+ editorial board members. Here we introduce a selection of Chief Editors from our 380 academic disciplines. Mary M David B Allison Jose Biller Idan Segev Larry Abbott (Continued on back cover) Christopher University of Loyola University The Hebrew Columbia University of Alabama at Medical Center, University of University, USA California, USA Birmingham, USA USA Jerusalem, Israel Richard A Frederic Kaplan Martin G Klotz Jon H Kaas Johannes le Coutre Derek LeRoith Joav Merrick Annalisa Pastore Henry Markram Jorgensen EPFL, Switzerland University of Vanderbilt Nestle Research Mt Sinai School of Ministry of Social King’s College EPFL, Switzerland University of North Carolina at University, USA Center, Switzerland Medicine, USA Affairs, Israel London, UK Arizona, USA Charlotte, USA Matthias Barton Ferdinand Antonio Francesco Steve Suib Alex Hansen George E Billman Berend Smit Mark A Elgar Jos Van Der Meer University of Köckerling Corno The University of NTNU, Norway The Ohio State University of University of Radboud University Zurich, Switzerland Vivantes Hospital University Sains Connecticut, USA University, USA California, USA Melbourne, Nijmegen Medical Berlin, Germany Malaysia, Malaysia Australia Centre, Netherlands Jeff M P Holly Carlos M. Duarte Kendall A Smith Lee Samuel Finn Mel Slater Giuseppe Giaccone Axel Cleeremans Théophile Alex M Thomson University of King Abdullah Weill Medical The Pennsylvania ICREA-University Georgetown Université
    [Show full text]
  • Readership Data and Research Impact
    Readership data and Research Impact Ehsan Mohammadi1, Mike Thelwall 2 1School of Library and Information Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America 2Statistical Cybermetrics Research Group, School of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom Abstract: Reading academic publications is a key scholarly activity. Scholars accessing and recording academic publications online are producing new types of readership data. These include publisher, repository and academic social network download statistics as well as online reference manager records. This chapter discusses the use of download and reference manager data for research evaluation and library collection development. The focus is on the validity and application of readership data as an impact indicator for academic publications across different discipline. Mendeley is particularly promising in this regard, although all data sources are not subjected to rigorous quality control and can be manipulated. Subject terms: readership; academic social network sites; reference managers; Mendeley 1.1 Introduction and Overview The act of reading an academic publication is a key point at which knowledge is transferred from the author to someone else. With the prevalence of the web and social web, scholars now often read and register academic publications online, leaving electronic records of their activities. This readership data can reveal which outputs are used as well as giving insights how the scientific enterprise works. It is important to exploit such information to improve research evaluation practices and to investigate how science communication is evolving. The main advantage of using readership information rather than citations is that reading occurs before citing and can therefore give more timely information.
    [Show full text]
  • National Principles Concerning Phd Thesis As a Collection of Articles
    National principles concerning PhD thesis as a collection of articles Working group on the duration of PhD trajectories 27-08-2020 In its earlier memorandum to the Board of Law Deans (Raad der Decanen Rechtsgeleerdheid, RDR) dated 2 April 2020, the ‘Working group on the duration of PhD trajectories’ announced an upcoming separate memorandum on the theme of the PhD thesis as a collection of articles. Hence this document1. The principle behind considering the theme of the PhD thesis as a collection of articles, is that the RDR wishes to a. stimulate the PhD thesis as a collection of articles as a fully-fledged and high-quality way of gaining a PhD within the field of law, and b. achieve as much unity as possible at national level, also with the aim of making this type of trajectory foreseeable (in advance), i.e. a legal PhD thesis as a collection of articles, looks, in principle, like ‘this’. This reduction of uncertainty is required in order to introduce broader implementation of the PhD thesis as a collection of articles2. Furthermore, regulations on the PhD thesis as a collection of articles can facilitate inter and multi- disciplinary research within law faculties, in particular for disciplines in which the PhD thesis as a collection of articles is the norm. In this context, we have considered the formulation of a number of national principles for PhDs of this nature (for example covering the number of articles, coherence, authorship, reviews etc.). We are referring, in concrete terms, to a set of principles. The PhD regulations of the universities in question will (must) always take precedence; for the remainder, the principle of ‘comply or explain’ will apply.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Read a Scientific Article -Cain Project in Engineering and Professional Communication
    How to Read a Scientific Article Mary Purugganan, Ph.D. [email protected] Jan Hewitt, Ph.D. [email protected] Cain Project in Engineering and Professional Communication Reading a scientific article is a complex task. The worst way to approach this task is to treat it like the reading of a textbook—reading from title to literature cited, digesting every word along the way without any reflection or criticism. Rather, you should begin by skimming the article to identify its structure and features. As you read, look for the author’s main points. Generate questions before, during, and after reading. Draw inferences based on your own experiences and knowledge. And to really improve understanding and recall, take notes as you read. This handout discusses each of these strategies in more detail. 1. Skim the article and identify its structure. Most journals use a conventional IMRD structure: An abstract followed by Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion. Each of these sections normally contains easily recognized conventional features, and if you read with an anticipation of these features, you will read an article more quickly and comprehend more. Features of Abstracts Abstracts usually contain four kinds of information: • purpose or rationale of study (why they did it) • methodology (how they did it) • results (what they found) • conclusion (what it means) Most scientists read the abstract first. Others—especially experts in the field—skip right from the title to the visuals because the visuals, in many cases, tell the reader what kinds of experiments were done and what results were obtained. You should probably begin reading a paper by reading the abstract carefully and noting the four kinds of information outlined above.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Guidelines for the DEVELOPMENT and PROMOTION of OPEN ACCESS Communication and Information Sector
    United Nations [ Cultural Organization Policy Guidelines FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND PROMOTION OF OPEN ACCESS Communication and Information Sector United Nations [ Cultural Organization Policy Guidelines FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND PROMOTION OF OPEN ACCESS by Alma Swan Open Guidelines Series Published by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France © UNESCO 2012. Available in Open Access to copy, distribute and transmit the work for non-commercial purposes with appropriate attribution to the work. Some rights reserved for adaptation and derivative works. Permission must be taken from UNESCO for commercial use. Adaptation and derivatives of the work should not carry the UNESCO logo, and UNESCO shall not be responsible for any distortion of facts therein. Distortion, mutilation, modification of a Work leading to derogatory action in relation to the author of the work, the Work, and reputation of UNESCO and its Member States will be treated as breach of the Open Access provision. The person/institution responsible for the adaptation/derivative work shall be responsible for legal action, if any, and shall indemnify UNESCO from any liability arising out of such action. ISBN 978-92-3-001052-2 The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. About the Author: Dr. Alma Swan, a leading expert in scholarly communication and Open Access, is Director of Key Perspectives Ltd, United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Nber Working Paper Series Open Access As a Crude
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES OPEN ACCESS AS A CRUDE SOLUTION TO A HOLD-UP PROBLEM IN THE TWO-SIDED MARKET FOR ACADEMIC JOURNALS Mark J. McCabe Christopher M. Snyder Working Paper 22220 http://www.nber.org/papers/w22220 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 May 2016 We thank Mark Armstrong, Sumit Joshi, Simon Loertscher, David Malueg, Lars Stole, and seminar participants at American University, Dartmouth College, George Washington University, MIT, New York University, Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum, Santa Clara University, Tulane University, the University of Chicago, the University of Goettingen, Yale University, the Cologne Summit on Open Access Publishing, the Emory University Symposium on Open Access and Digital Preservation, the International Industrial Organization Conference (Chicago), and the NBER Workshop on Scholarly Communication, Open Science, and Its Impact (Cambridge, MA) for helpful comments. This paper grew out of an earlier project, "The Economics of Open-Access Journals," conducted under grants from the Open Society Institute, NET Institute, and Stigler Center for Study of Economy and State at the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business. Funding for work on this paper was provided by the Sloan Foundation, grant #G-2012-10-20, which the authors gratefully acknowledge. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2016 by Mark J.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Preparing a Dissertation, Thesis, Or Report at Michigan Technological University
    GUIDE TO PREPARING A DISSERTATION, THESIS, OR REPORT AT MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY By The Graduate School MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 2021 Modified spring 2021 to update templates Guide for Dissertations, Theses, and Reports – 2021 Revision Table of Contents List of Figures .....................................................................................................................v List of Tables .................................................................................................................... vi 1. Overview .......................................................................................................................1 2. Graduate School Online Resources ............................................................................2 2.1. Degree completion and deadlines .........................................................................2 2.2. Formatting Resources ...........................................................................................3 2.3. Writing Resources .................................................................................................3 2.3.1. Turnitin .....................................................................................................3 2.3.2. Michigan Tech Multiliteracies Center ......................................................3 3. Formatting guidelines ..................................................................................................4 3.1. Typefaces ..............................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Engaging the Reader: Article-Level Enhancements in the Humanities and Social Sciences
    article excerpted from: information StandardS Quarterly SUMMER 2010 | VOL 22 | ISSUE 3 | ISSN 1041-0031 special issue: enhanced journal articles Article-level enhAncements in the humAnities And sociAl sciences hosting supplementAry MateriAl Archiving supplementAl MateriAls DOIs for JournAls: linking And Beyond 4 FE in the mid-to-late 1990s, electronic publishing visionaries held ambitious dreams. they predicted the end of the print journal and the emergence of virtual ones. Journal brands would eventually disappear and article bundles would take their place. portals were the rage. Building community was a piece of cake. scientific breakthroughs would happen faster with electronic journals. ideas raced across the information superhighway. DEAn SMITH AND WENDY QUEEN ENGaGInG e H t READER ARTICLE-LEVEL ENHANCEMENTS IN THE HUMANItIeS AND SoCIAL SCIENCeS fe 5 the scholarly journal and its collection of articles in a given area provided the ideal format for online delivery. its time had come. newly minted webmasters scoffed at PDF articles and became zealots for HTML and Javascript. it was the beginning of a transitional phase in scholarly publishing that is still progressing today—and the pace is picking up. early advances in electronic journal publishing came from the STM publishers whose substantial resources and sense of innovation provided a blueprint for publishers in the humanities and social sciences. Experiments such as the TULIP Project, Red Sage, and the work of individual publishers led the digital transition from print to web publication and drove early enhancements at the article level. Speed to publication, especially in the scientific disciplines became an industry differentiator. Initiatives undertaken to publish articles in advance of print such as ASAP Articles (As Soon As Publishable), first developed by the American Chemical Society in 1998, positioned the web article as the version of record—elevating it to prominence as distinct from printed copies of a journal article.
    [Show full text]