DOCSLIB.ORG

Integration of Dg Symplectic Manifolds Via Mapping Spaces

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Integration of Dg Symplectic Manifolds Via Mapping Spaces INTEGRATION OF DG SYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS VIA MAPPING SPACES RAJAN MEHTA Abstract. Severa and Roytenberg observed that Courant algebroids are in one-to-one correspondence with differential graded (DG) symplec- tic manifolds of degree 2. I will describe this correspondence, as well as an integration procedure (due to Severa, following Sullivan) involving mapping spaces. The result of the integration procedure is a symplectic 2-groupoid, but it is infinite-dimensional. Nonetheless, the integration can be explicitly described in the case of exact Courant algebroids, and this construction helps to explain why (twisted) Dirac structures inte- grate to (twisted) presymplectic groupoids. This talk is based on joint work with Xiang Tang. Outline: (1) Warmup: Integration of Poisson manifolds from the DG perspective (2) Correspondence between Courant algebroids and degree 2 symplectic NQ-manifolds (3) Integrating exact Courant algebroids (4) (twisted) Dirac structures 1. Warmup: Poisson manifolds 1.1. Poisson structures in the DG language. Let (M; π) be a Pois- son manifold. Because of the integrability condition [π; π] = 0, we have • a differential dπ := [π; ·] on the algebra X (M) = Γ(^TM) of multivector fields: dπ dπ C1(M) / X(M) / X2(M) / ··· This differential, together with the Schouten bracket, gives X•(M) the struc- ture of a differential graded Poisson algebra (i.e. a differential graded Lie al- gebra where the differential and Lie bracket are derivations). We can recover the Poisson bracket as a derived bracket: ff; gg = [dπf; g]: 1 2 RAJAN MEHTA It's worth noting that all of the content of dπ is contained in the first map taking functions to their Hamiltonian vector fields. The action of dπ in higher degrees is completely determined by the compatibility conditions. From the perspective of graded geometry, we can view X•(M) as the \smooth functions" on the shifted cotangent bundle T ∗[1]M, the Schouten bracket as the Poisson bracket corresponding to the canonical symplectic structure, π as a degree 2 function, and the differential as its Hamiltonian vector field. Conversely, it can be shown that any symplectic graded manifold with co- ordinates in degrees 0 and 1 is canonically isomorphic to T ∗[1]M for some manifold M, giving a correspondence between Poisson manifolds and \de- gree 1 symplectic NQ-manifolds". 1.2. Integration via mapping spaces. Given a Poisson manifold M, one can build a simplicial manifold in the following way: the k-simplices are Q- manifold maps T [1]∆k ! T ∗[1]M, and the face and degeneracy maps come from the natural maps between simplices. We can translate this into non-super language, since all the Q-manifolds correspond to Lie algebroids: the k-simplices are Lie algebroid morphisms from T ∆k to T ∗M. Now we can give a more concrete description for low k ∗ degrees. We use the notation Xk := HomLA(T ∆ ;T M). •X0 = M. •X1 is the space of smooth cotangent paths. •X2 consists of \triangular homotopies" between cotangent paths. To obtain a groupoid, we truncate this simplicial manifold at level 1, by identifying elements of X1 that are homotopic (with respect to X2). Specif- ically, given a pair η1; η2 2 X2 that agree on two of the three face maps, we identify the respective images of η1 and η2 under the third face map. The result is (up to integrability issues) a Lie groupoid G ⇒ M. It is essentially equivalent to the (CF)2 integration, and it works equally well with arbitrary Lie algebroids in the place of T ∗M. 1.3. Symplectic structure of the integration. Now we can try to see the symplectic structure on the integration of a Poisson manifold. Fix γ 2 Xk, and let v1; v2 be tangent vectors in TγXk. The symplectic structure on ∗ T [1]M provides a way to pair v1 and v2, giving a degree 1 function on T [1]∆k, i.e. a 1-form on ∆k. When k = 1, the 1-form can be integrated. Thus, X1 is equipped with a 2-form, and it is both closed and multiplica- tive. Furthermore, the kernel of the 2-form precisely coincides with the homotopies, so that it descends to multiplicative symplectic form on the quotient G ⇒ M. INTEGRATION OF DG SYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS VIA MAPPING SPACES 3 2. Courant algebroids in the DG language Let E ! M be a Courant algebroid (we use the non-skew definition, where the bracket is a Leibniz bracket). There is an associated DG algebra in this setting as well: D L C1(M) / Γ(E) / o(E) / ··· Here, •D is given by hDf; ei = ρ(e)(f), • o(E) is the space of first-order skew-symmetric operators on Γ(E), and •L is given by Le1 e2 = e1; e2 . J K There is also a degree −2 Lie bracket f; g, where • fe1; e2g coincides with the inner product for e1; e2 2 Γ(E), • fφ, eg = φ(e) and fφ, fg = σ(φ)(f) for φ 2 o(E), e 2 Γ(E), and f 2 C1(M) (here σ is the symbol map), • fφ1; φ2g coincides with the commutator bracket, • ff; gg = ff; eg = 0. As in the Poisson case, all of the content is in this lower-degree part of the complex. The algebra is generated in degrees 0, 1, and 2, and the Lie bracket and differential can be uniquely extended to give a DG Poisson algebra. Again like the Poisson case, the anchor and Courant bracket are derived brackets: ρ(e)(f) = fLe; fg = fDf; eg e1; e2 = fLe1 ; e2g: J K A slightly less trivial observation is that the Courant algebroid axioms are direct consequences of the DG Poisson algebra axioms. From the perspective of graded geometry, we view this DG Poisson algebra as the \smooth functions" on a degree 2 symplectic NQ-manifold E. Con- versely, any degree 2 symplectic NQ-manifold gives a Courant algebroid via the derived bracket construction, so there is a correspondence. 3. Integrating exact Courant algebroids As in the Poisson case, one can build a simplicial manifold by taking k Xk := HomQ(T [1]∆ ; E): 4 RAJAN MEHTA The 2-form now appears on X2, because the symplectic structure on E is degree 2. But again, the general theory says that the 2-form is closed and multiplicative, and that it descends to a symplectic form on the 2-groupoid truncation G2 V G1 ⇒ M. But, even in simple cases (such as a Lie algebra with a bilinear form), this 2-groupoid is infinite-dimensional. In the case of the standard Courant algebroid E = TM ⊕ T ∗M, we have E = T [1](T ∗[1]M), and we can make the identification k ∗ k ∗ Xk = HomQ(T [1]∆ ;T [1](T [1]M)) = Hom(T [1]∆ ;T [1]M); where the last Hom is just in the category of graded manifolds. In other k ∗ words, Xk consists of bundle maps from T ∆ to T M. In low degrees, we have: •X0 = M, ∗ •X1 can be identified with the space of paths in T M. It will not be affected by the truncation, so G1 = X1. • After truncation, the points of the quotient G2 := X2= ∼ can be described by a homotopy class of maps α : ∆2 ! M and maps ∗ ξ0; ξ1; ξ2 lifting each edge of α to T M. (The ξi are not required to agree at the vertices.) Note that, in this case, there is a natural symplectic structure !1 on G1 which is not part of the general theory. However, the simplicial coboundary (i.e. alternating sum of pullbacks by the face maps) of !1 is equal to the symplectic form !2 on G2 (which is part of the general theory). If the standard Courant bracket is twisted by a closed 3-form H, then the corresponding NQ-manifold E0 is isomorphic (but not symplectomorphic!) to the standard one. So, the integrating 2-groupoid is the same, but the sym- 0 plectic form !2 is different. Nonetheless, it is still the simplicial coboundary 0 0 ^ ^ of a 2-form !1 on G1. Specifically, !1 = !1 + H, where H is the \transgres- 0 sion" of H to the path space. But now, !1 isn't closed. Instead, letting δ be the simplicial coboundary, we have 0 0 !2 = δ!1; 0 d!1 = δH; dH = 0: 4. integrating Dirac structures In the DG picture, Dirac structures correspond to wide Lagrangian sub- NQ-manifolds of E. By \wide" I mean that the degree 0 part is all of M. The general theory then says that Dirac structures will integrate to wide Lagrangian sub-2-groupoids L2 V L1 ⇒ M. Let i be the inclusion into the symplectic 2-groupoid G2 V G1 ⇒ M. INTEGRATION OF DG SYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS VIA MAPPING SPACES 5 ∗ In the case of the standard Courant algebroid, L1 inherits the 2-form i !1. ∗ ∗ It is obviously closed, and it is also multiplicative, since δi !1 = i δ!1 = ∗ i !2 = 0, because L2 is Lagrangian. Therefore, it survives the 1-groupoid truncation and induces a closed, multiplicative (but possibly degenerate) 2-form on the Lie groupoid integrating the Dirac structure. If the standard Courant bracket is twisted by a closed 3-form H, then L1 ∗ 0 inherits the 2-form i !1. It is still multiplicative, but instead of being closed, it satisfies the equation ∗ 0 d(i !1) = δH: In other words, it is \H-closed". Remarks: This helps to explain why (twisted) Dirac structures integrate to (twisted) presymplectic groupoids. However, in the BCWZ paper there is an extra nondegeneracy condition that we should be able to see.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introduction to Dynamical Triangulations
    Introduction to Dynamical Triangulations Andrzej G¨orlich Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen Naxos, September 12th, 2011 Andrzej G¨orlich Causal Dynamical Triangulation Outline 1 Path integral for quantum gravity 2 Causal Dynamical Triangulations 3 Numerical setup 4 Phase diagram 5 Background geometry 6 Quantum fluctuations Andrzej G¨orlich Causal Dynamical Triangulation Path integral formulation of quantum mechanics A classical particle follows a unique trajectory. Quantum mechanics can be described by Path Integrals: All possible trajectories contribute to the transition amplitude. To define the functional integral, we discretize the time coordinate and approximate each path by linear pieces. space classical trajectory t1 time t2 Andrzej G¨orlich Causal Dynamical Triangulation Path integral formulation of quantum mechanics A classical particle follows a unique trajectory. Quantum mechanics can be described by Path Integrals: All possible trajectories contribute to the transition amplitude. To define the functional integral, we discretize the time coordinate and approximate each path by linear pieces. quantum trajectory space classical trajectory t1 time t2 Andrzej G¨orlich Causal Dynamical Triangulation Path integral formulation of quantum mechanics A classical particle follows a unique trajectory. Quantum mechanics can be described by Path Integrals: All possible trajectories contribute to the transition amplitude. To define the functional integral, we discretize the time coordinate and approximate each path by linear pieces. quantum trajectory space classical trajectory t1 time t2 Andrzej G¨orlich Causal Dynamical Triangulation Path integral formulation of quantum gravity General Relativity: gravity is encoded in space-time geometry. The role of a trajectory plays now the geometry of four-dimensional space-time. All space-time histories contribute to the transition amplitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Topics in Equivariant Cohomology
    Topics in Equivariant Cohomology Luke Keating Hughes Thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy in Pure Mathematics at The University of Adelaide Faculty of Mathematical and Computer Sciences School of Mathematical Sciences February 1, 2017 Contents Abstract v Signed Statement vii Acknowledgements ix 1 Introduction 1 2 Classical Equivariant Cohomology 7 2.1 Topological Equivariant Cohomology . 7 2.1.1 Group Actions . 7 2.1.2 The Borel Construction . 9 2.1.3 Principal Bundles and the Classifying Space . 11 2.2 TheGeometryofPrincipalBundles. 20 2.2.1 The Action of a Lie Algebra . 20 2.2.2 Connections and Curvature . 21 2.2.3 Basic Di↵erentialForms ............................ 26 2.3 Equivariant de Rham Theory . 28 2.3.1 TheWeilAlgebra................................ 28 2.3.2 TheWeilModel ................................ 34 2.3.3 The Chern-Weil Homomorphism . 35 2.3.4 The Mathai-Quillen Isomorphism . 36 2.3.5 The Cartan Model . 37 3 Simplicial Methods 39 3.1 SimplicialandCosimplicialObjects. 39 3.1.1 The Simplicial Category . 39 3.1.2 CosimplicialObjects .............................. 41 3.1.3 SimplicialObjects ............................... 43 3.1.4 The Nerve of a Category . 47 3.1.5 Geometric Realisation . 49 iii 3.2 A Simplicial Construction of the Universal Bundle . 53 3.2.1 Basic Properties of NG ........................... 53 | •| 3.2.2 Principal Bundles and Local Trivialisations . 56 3.2.3 The Homotopy Extension Property and NDR Pairs . 57 3.2.4 Constructing Local Sections . 61 4 Simplicial Equivariant de Rham Theory 65 4.1 Dupont’s Simplicial de Rham Theorem . 65 4.1.1 The Double Complex of a Simplicial Space .
    [Show full text]
  • Vertex-Unfoldings of Simplicial Manifolds Erik D
    Masthead Logo Smith ScholarWorks Computer Science: Faculty Publications Computer Science 2002 Vertex-Unfoldings of Simplicial Manifolds Erik D. Demaine Massachusetts nI stitute of Technology David Eppstein University of California, Irvine Jeff rE ickson University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign George W. Hart State University of New York at Stony Brook Joseph O'Rourke Smith College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.smith.edu/csc_facpubs Part of the Computer Sciences Commons, and the Geometry and Topology Commons Recommended Citation Demaine, Erik D.; Eppstein, David; Erickson, Jeff; Hart, George W.; and O'Rourke, Joseph, "Vertex-Unfoldings of Simplicial Manifolds" (2002). Computer Science: Faculty Publications, Smith College, Northampton, MA. https://scholarworks.smith.edu/csc_facpubs/60 This Article has been accepted for inclusion in Computer Science: Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Smith ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected] Vertex-Unfoldings of Simplicial Manifolds Erik D. Demaine∗ David Eppstein† Jeff Erickson‡ George W. Hart§ Joseph O’Rourke¶ Abstract We present an algorithm to unfold any triangulated 2-manifold (in particular, any simplicial polyhedron) into a non-overlapping, connected planar layout in linear time. The manifold is cut only along its edges. The resulting layout is connected, but it may have a disconnected interior; the triangles are connected at vertices, but not necessarily joined along edges. We extend our algorithm to establish a similar result for simplicial manifolds of arbitrary dimension. 1 Introduction It is a long-standing open problem to determine whether every convex polyhe- dron can be cut along its edges and unfolded flat in one piece without overlap, that is, into a simple polygon.
    [Show full text]
  • From Double Lie Groupoids to Local Lie 2-Groupoids
    Smith ScholarWorks Mathematics and Statistics: Faculty Publications Mathematics and Statistics 12-1-2011 From Double Lie Groupoids to Local Lie 2-Groupoids Rajan Amit Mehta Pennsylvania State University, [email protected] Xiang Tang Washington University in St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.smith.edu/mth_facpubs Part of the Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Mehta, Rajan Amit and Tang, Xiang, "From Double Lie Groupoids to Local Lie 2-Groupoids" (2011). Mathematics and Statistics: Faculty Publications, Smith College, Northampton, MA. https://scholarworks.smith.edu/mth_facpubs/91 This Article has been accepted for inclusion in Mathematics and Statistics: Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Smith ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected] FROM DOUBLE LIE GROUPOIDS TO LOCAL LIE 2-GROUPOIDS RAJAN AMIT MEHTA AND XIANG TANG Abstract. We apply the bar construction to the nerve of a double Lie groupoid to obtain a local Lie 2-groupoid. As an application, we recover Haefliger’s fun- damental groupoid from the fundamental double groupoid of a Lie groupoid. In the case of a symplectic double groupoid, we study the induced closed 2-form on the associated local Lie 2-groupoid, which leads us to propose a definition of a symplectic 2-groupoid. 1. Introduction In homological algebra, given a bisimplicial object A•,• in an abelian cate- gory, one naturally associates two chain complexes. One is the diagonal complex diag(A) := {Ap,p}, and the other is the total complex Tot(A) := { p+q=• Ap,q}. The (generalized) Eilenberg-Zilber theorem [DP61] (see, e.g. [Wei95, TheoremP 8.5.1]) states that diag(A) is quasi-isomorphic to Tot(A).
    [Show full text]
  • Homological Pairs on Simplicial Manifolds
    DISS. ETH NO. ................... HOMOLOGICAL PAIRS ON SIMPLICIAL MANIFOLDS A thesis submitted to attain the degree of DOCTOR OF SCIENCES of ETH ZURICH (Dr. sc. ETH Zurich) presented by Claudio Sibilia MSc. Math., ETHZ Born on 23.12.1987 Citizen of Italy accepted on the recommendation of Prof. Dr. Giovanni Felder Prof. Dr. Damien Calaque Prof. Dr. Benjamin Enriquez 2017 ii Abstract In this thesis we study the relation between Chen theory of formal homology connection, Universal Knizh- nik{Zamolodchikov connection and Universal Knizhnik{Zamolodchikov-Bernard connection. In the first chapter, we give a summary of some results of Chen. In the second chapter we extend the notion of formal homology connection to simplicial manifolds. In particular, this allows us to construct formal homology connection on manifolds M equipped with a smooth/holomorphic properly discontinuos group action of a discrete group G. We prove that the monodromy represetation of that connection coincides with the Malcev completion of the group M=G. In the second chapter, we use this theory to produces holomorphic flat connections and we show that the universal Universal Knizhnik{Zamolodchikov-Bernard connection on the punctured elliptic curve can be constructed as a formal homology connection. Moreover, we produce an algorithm to construct such a connection by using the homotopy transfer theorem. In the third chapter, we extend this procedure for the configuration space of points of the punctured elliptic curve. Our approach is very general and it can be used to construct flat connections on more challenging manifolds equipped with a group action. For example it can be used for the configuration space of points of a higher genus Riemann surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Lo -Algebras
    Compositio Math. 144 (2008) 1017–1045 doi:10.1112/S0010437X07003405 Integrating L∞-algebras Andr´e Henriques Abstract Given a Lie n-algebra, we provide an explicit construction of its integrating Lie n-group. This extends work done by Getzler in the case of nilpotent L∞-algebras. When applied to an ordinary Lie algebra, our construction yields the simplicial classifying space of the corresponding simply connected Lie group. In the case of the string Lie 2-algebra of Baez and Crans, we obtain the simplicial nerve of their model of the string group. 1. Introduction 1.1 Homotopy Lie algebras Stasheff [Sta92] introduced L∞-algebras, or strongly homotopy Lie algebras, as a model for ‘Lie algebras that satisfy Jacobi up to all higher homotopies’ (see also [HS93]). A (non-negatively graded) L∞-algebra is a graded vector space L = L0 ⊕ L1 ⊕ L2 ⊕··· equipped with brackets []:L → L, [ , ]:Λ2L → L, [ ,,]:Λ3L → L, ··· (1) of degrees −1, 0, 1, 2 ..., where the exterior powers are interpreted in the graded sense. Thereafter, all L∞-algebras will be assumed finite-dimensional in each degree. The axioms satisfied by the brackets can be summarized as follows. ∨ ∗ R ∗ Let L be the graded vector space with Ln−1 =Hom(Ln−1, )indegreen,andletC (L):= Sym(L∨) be its symmetric algebra, again interpreted in the graded sense ∗ ∗ 2 ∗ ∗ 3 ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ C (L)=R ⊕ [L0] ⊕ [Λ L0 ⊕ L1] ⊕ [Λ L0 ⊕ (L0 ⊗ L1) ⊕ L2] 2 (2) 4 ∗ 2 ∗ ∗ ∗ ⊕ [Λ L0 ⊕ (Λ L0 ⊗ L1) ⊕ Sym L1 ⊕···] ⊕··· . The transpose of the brackets (1) can be assembled into a degree one map L∨ → C∗(L), which extends uniquely to a derivation δ : C∗(L) → C∗(L).
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1608.00296V2
    Continuous point symmetries in Group Field Theories Alexander Kegeles∗ and Daniele Oriti† Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (Albert Einstein Institute), Am Mühlenberg 1, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany, EU We discuss the notion of symmetries in non-local field theories characterized by integro-differential equations of motion, from a geometric perspective. We then focus on Group Field Theory (GFT) models of quantum gravity and provide a general analysis of their continuous point symmetry transformations, including the generalized conservation laws following from them. Introduction a quite extensive literature available on this subject [12– 14]. However, in contrast to local field theories, the meth- Symmetry principles are omni-present in modern physics, ods and strategies of analysis strongly vary from case to and especially in the quantum field theory formulation case, and no universal method is known yet. As a result, of fundamental interactions. They enter crucially in we do not know a priori which of the known methods the very definition of fundamental fields and particles, can be suitable adapted for the analysis of group field they dictate the allowed interactions between them, and theories. Particular examples for symmetry calculations capture key features of such interactions in terms of for several GFT models were calculated in [15] but no conservation laws. They also offer powerful conceptual systematic treatment was proposed there. tools, for example, in the characterization of macroscopic In this paper we investigate the variational symmetry phases of quantum systems, as well as many computa- groups of various prominent models in Group Field The- tional simplifications and powerful mathematical tech- ory, that is symmetries of the action and not the (wider) niques for numerical and analytical calculations.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Geometry in 4D Causal Dynamical Triangulations
    Background Geometry in 4D Causal Dynamical Triangulations Andrzej G¨orlich Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, Kraków Zakopane, June 17, 2008 Andrzej G¨orlich Background Geometry in 4D Causal Dynamical Triangulations Outline 1 Path integral formulation of Quantum Gravity 2 Causal Dynamical Triangulations 3 Monte Carlo Simulations 4 Phase diagram 5 Background geometry Andrzej G¨orlich Background Geometry in 4D Causal Dynamical Triangulations Path integral formulation of Quantum Gravity The partition function of quantum gravity is defined as a formal integral over all geometries weighted by the Einstein-Hilbert action. To make sense of the gravitational path integral one uses the standard method of regularization - discretization. The path integral is written as a nonperturbative sum over all causal triangulations T . Wick rotation is well defined due to global proper-time foliation. Using Monte Carlo techniques we can calculate expectation values of observables. Z X 1 Regge DM[g] iSEH [g] Z = eiS [g] Z = e → s(T ) DiffM T Causal Dynamical Triangulations (CDT) is a background independent approach to quantum gravity. Andrzej G¨orlich Background Geometry in 4D Causal Dynamical Triangulations Path integral formulation of Quantum Gravity The partition function of quantum gravity is defined as a formal integral over all geometries weighted by the Einstein-Hilbert action. To make sense of the gravitational path integral one uses the standard method of regularization - discretization. The path integral is written as a nonperturbative sum over all causal triangulations T . Wick rotation is well defined due to global proper-time foliation. Using Monte Carlo techniques we can calculate expectation values of observables. Z X 1 Regge DM[g] iSEH [g] Z = eiS [g] Z = e → s(T ) DiffM T Causal Dynamical Triangulations (CDT) is a background independent approach to quantum gravity.
    [Show full text]
  • Invariants of Piecewise-Linear 3-Manifolds
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 348, Number 10, October 1996 INVARIANTS OF PIECEWISE-LINEAR 3-MANIFOLDS JOHN W. BARRETT AND BRUCE W. WESTBURY Abstract. This paper presents an algebraic framework for constructing in- variants of closed oriented 3-manifolds by taking a state sum model on a tri- angulation. This algebraic framework consists of a tensor category with a condition on the duals which we have called a spherical category. A significant feature is that the tensor category is not required to be braided. The main examples are constructed from the categories of representations of involutive Hopf algebras and of quantised enveloping algebras at a root of unity. 0. Introduction The purpose of this paper is to present an algebraic framework for constructing invariants of closed oriented 3-manifolds. The construction is in the spirit of topo- logical quantum field theory and the invariant is calculated from a triangulation of the 3-manifold. The data for the construction of the invariant is a tensor category with a condition on the duals, which we have called a spherical category. The def- inition of a spherical category and a coherence theorem needed in this paper are given in [3]. There are two classes of examples of spherical categories discussed in this paper. The first examples are given by the quantised enveloping algebra of a semisimple Lie algebra, and the second are given by an involutive Hopf algebra. In the first case, the invariant for sl2 defined in this paper is the Turaev-Viro invariant [25]. This invariant is known to distinguish lens spaces of the same homotopy type which already shows that the invariants in this paper are not trivial.
    [Show full text]
  • Lattice Φ4 Field Theory on Riemann Manifolds: Numerical Tests for the 2D Ising CFT on S2
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D 98, 014502 (2018) Lattice ϕ4 field theory on Riemann manifolds: Numerical tests for the 2D Ising CFT on S2 † ‡ Richard C. Brower,* Michael Cheng, and Evan S. Weinberg Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA ∥ George T. Fleming§ and Andrew D. Gasbarro Yale University, Sloane Laboratory, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA Timothy G. Raben¶ Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA and University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA Chung-I Tan** Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA (Received 7 June 2018; published 6 July 2018) We present a method for defining a lattice realization of the ϕ4 quantum field theory on a simplicial complex in order to enable numerical computation on a general Riemann manifold. The procedure begins with adopting methods from traditional Regge calculus (RC) and finite element methods (FEM) plus the addition of ultraviolet counterterms required to reach the renormalized field theory in the continuum limit. The construction is tested numerically for the two-dimensional ϕ4 scalar field theory on the Riemann two- sphere, S2, in comparison with the exact solutions to the two-dimensional Ising conformal field theory (CFT). Numerical results for the Binder cumulants (up to 12th order) and the two- and four-point correlation functions are in agreement with the exact c ¼ 1=2 CFT solutions. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.014502 I. INTRODUCTION Weyl transform from flat Euclidean space Rd to a compact Sd Lattice field theory (LFT) has proven to be a powerful spherical manifold ,orinRadial Quantization [2],a nonperturbative approach to quantum field theory [1]. Weyl transformation to the cylindrical boundary, R Sd−1 dþ1 However the lattice regulator has generally been restricted × ,ofAdS .
    [Show full text]
  • Phase Structure of Causal Dynamical Triangulations.Pdf
    Phase Structure of Causal Dynamical Triangulations Andrzej Görlich Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen Jena, November 5th, 2015 Andrzej Görlich (NBI) Causal Dynamical Triangulations Jena, November 5th, 2015 1 / 27 1 Introduction to CDT 2 Phase diagram 3 De Sitter phase 4 New bifurcation phase 5 Phase transitions Andrzej Görlich (NBI) Causal Dynamical Triangulations Jena, November 5th, 2015 2 / 27 What is Causal Dynamical Triangulation? Causal Dynamical Triangulation (CDT) is a background independent approach to quantum gravity. Z EH X R D[g]eiS [g] e−S [T ] ! T CDT provides a lattice regularization of the formal gravitational path integral via a sum over causal triangulations. Andrzej Görlich (NBI) Causal Dynamical Triangulations Jena, November 5th, 2015 3 / 27 Quantum mechanics can be described by Path Integrals: All possible trajectories contribute to the transition amplitude. To define the functional integral, we discretize the time coordinate and approximate any path by linear pieces. Path integral formulation of quantum mechanics A classical particle follows a unique trajectory. space classical trajectory t1 time t2 Andrzej Görlich (NBI) Causal Dynamical Triangulations Jena, November 5th, 2015 4 / 27 To define the functional integral, we discretize the time coordinate and approximate any path by linear pieces. Path integral formulation of quantum mechanics A classical particle follows a unique trajectory. Quantum mechanics can be described by Path Integrals: All possible trajectories contribute to the transition amplitude. quantum trajectory space classical trajectory t1 time t2 Andrzej Görlich (NBI) Causal Dynamical Triangulations Jena, November 5th, 2015 4 / 27 Path integral formulation of quantum mechanics A classical particle follows a unique trajectory.
    [Show full text]
  • LIE GROUPOIDS and LIE ALGEBROIDS LECTURE NOTES, FALL 2017 Contents 1. Lie Groupoids 4 1.1. Definitions 4 1.2. Examples 6 1.3. Ex
    LIE GROUPOIDS AND LIE ALGEBROIDS LECTURE NOTES, FALL 2017 ECKHARD MEINRENKEN Abstract. These notes are under construction. They contain errors and omissions, and the references are very incomplete. Apologies! Contents 1. Lie groupoids 4 1.1. Definitions 4 1.2. Examples 6 1.3. Exercises 9 2. Foliation groupoids 10 2.1. Definition, examples 10 2.2. Monodromy and holonomy 12 2.3. The monodromy and holonomy groupoids 12 2.4. Appendix: Haefliger’s approach 14 3. Properties of Lie groupoids 14 3.1. Orbits and isotropy groups 14 3.2. Bisections 15 3.3. Local bisections 17 3.4. Transitive Lie groupoids 18 4. More constructions with groupoids 19 4.1. Vector bundles in terms of scalar multiplication 20 4.2. Relations 20 4.3. Groupoid structures as relations 22 4.4. Tangent groupoid, cotangent groupoid 22 4.5. Prolongations of groupoids 24 4.6. Pull-backs and restrictions of groupoids 24 4.7. A result on subgroupoids 25 4.8. Clean intersection of submanifolds and maps 26 4.9. Intersections of Lie subgroupoids, fiber products 28 4.10. The universal covering groupoid 29 5. Groupoid actions, groupoid representations 30 5.1. Actions of Lie groupoids 30 5.2. Principal actions 31 5.3. Representations of Lie groupoids 33 6. Lie algebroids 33 1 2 ECKHARD MEINRENKEN 6.1. Definitions 33 6.2. Examples 34 6.3. Lie subalgebroids 36 6.4. Intersections of Lie subalgebroids 37 6.5. Direct products of Lie algebroids 38 7. Morphisms of Lie algebroids 38 7.1. Definition of morphisms 38 7.2.
    [Show full text]