DOCSLIB.ORG

Ehron Documents 1993

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ehron Documents 1993 Ehron Documents 1993 S-F-1325.12 CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL FORM (11-90) OFFICE OF THE EXECLTIVE SECRETARIAT ACTIVITY ADD DO NOT DETACH FROM ORIGINAL CORRESPONDENCE 01/19/93 10:17 SOURCE CODE pM PUBLIC MAIL SPEC INT: _ CONTROL N( S93-000578 DATE CORR: 01/13/93 DATERECD: 01/19/93 DATECNTRL: 01/19/93 -DATE DUE: LETTER: MEMO: TWX: _OTHER: MOTION TO:SECY: X DEPSEC: UN SEC: OTHER: ROM:FLOWERS,G PATRICK TX O REMARKS: ENRON CORP. UB J : LEGAL -=--_- LITIGATION FOR USE fY ACT N OFFICE ONLY MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE ACTION REFERRED TO DATE RETURN TO DUE OF NORTHERN NATURAL GAS CO., DATE TRANSWESTERN PIPELINE CO., 2 FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION CO... _3-_ ACTION TO: rr - TYPE ACTION: Appropriate action SIG OF: 3NCURRENCE: i NFORMATION:DS US EP FE ES1 D02 FILE CODE:PMFLOWFRS-ES930'00578 CONTROL ANALYST: B ATCHERSON 6-2255 ALL DOCUNfENTS FOR THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY MUST BE FORWARDED TO THE OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT FOR FINAL PROCESSING Vvcj-. ^. -, i IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Virginia Electric and Power Company, § Petitioner, §-- § v. § No. 92-1644 § (Not Consolidated) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, § Respondent. § Northern-Indiana Public § Service Company, § Petitioner, § v. § No. 93-1002 § (Not Consolidated) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, § Respondent. Northern States Power Company § (Minnesota) and § Northern States Power Company § (Wisconsin), § Petitioners, § § v. § No. 93-1003 § (Not Consolidated) Federal Energy Regulatory § Commission, Respondent. § Midland Cogeneration Venture § Limited Partnership, § § v. § No. 93-1006 § (Not Consolidated) Federal Energy Regulatory § .Commission, § Respondent. SNR\1014.jwz MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE OF NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY, TRANSWESTERN. PIPELINE COMPANY, FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY, AND ENRON GAS MARKETING, INC. Pursuant to Rule 15(d) of the Federal Rule _f Appellate Procedure, Northern Natural Gas Company ("Northern"), Transwestern Pipeline Company ("Transwestern"), Florida Gas Transmission Company ("Florida Gas"), and Enron Gas Marketing, Inc. ("EGM") (collectively referred to herein as "Enron") each hereby move for leave to intervene in the-above-captioned proceeding. In support of its motion, Enron states as follows: I. Northern, Transwestern, and Florida Gas own and operate pipeline systems and facilities and perform natural gas transportation and sales services on behalf of numerous customers, and are each interstate pipelines subject to the jurisdiction of Respondent under the Natural Gas Act. Moreover, Northern, Transwestern, and Florida Gas participated in the Docket Nos. RM91-11-000 and RM87-34-065 proceedings and are each involved in restructuring proceedings dictated by Order Nos. 636, et seq.1 1 Northern's restructuring proceeding is Docket No. RS92- 8-000; Florida Gas' restructuring proceeding is Docket No. RS92-16-000; and Transwestern's restructuring proceeding is Docket No. RS92-87-000. SNRU014o.j,-z 2 II. EGM is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Enron Gas Services, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Enron Corp., and is affiliated with several pipelines, including Northern, Transwestern, and Florida Gas. EGM is a markete pof natural gas, selling in excess of 2 Bcf per day on both a.spot and long-term basis. EGM obtains its supplies from virtually every major producing basin in the United States, as well as from Canada, and sells gas to markets located in 37 states. In a given month, EGM moves gas on approximately 100 pipelines. EGM is a party in approximately 58 of the pipelines' restructuring proceedings required pursuant to Order Nos. 636, et seq., and EGM participated in the respective docket proceeding before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. III- On December 14, 1992 and January 4, 1993, January 4, 1993, and January 5, 1993, respectively, Virginia-Electric and Power Company, Northern Indiana Public Service Company, Northern States Power Company (Minnesota), et al., and Midland Cogeneration Venture Limited Partnership petitioned this Court to review of the following Order of Respondent, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission: so l4.riz 3 3 Pipeline Service Obligations and Revisions to Regulations Governing Self-Implementing Trans- portation Under Part 284 of the Commission's Regulations and Regulation of Natural Gas Pipelines After Partial Wellhead Decontrol, Docket Nos. RM91- 11-004 and RM87-34-069, Order No. 636-B, "Order Denying Rehearing and Clarifying Order Nos. 636 and 636-A", 61 FERC (CCH) 1 61,272 (November 27 192). IV. Enron has a substantial interest in this proceeding and may be directly and substantially affected by the outcome thereof and cannot be represented adequately by any other party. For these reasons, good cause exists to-grant Enron's Motion to Intervene and to permit Enron's active participation in this proceeding. WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth herein, Enron respectfully moves to intervene in the above-captioned SHR\IO4.jvz 4 9 proceeding, and requests that it be accorded all rights as a full party to the proceeding. Respectfully submitted, By ^i G. Patrick Flowers Attorney Sherrie N. Rutherford Assistant General Counsel Legal and Regulatory Analysis Deborah A. Macdonald Vice President and General Counsel Northern Natural Gas Company Transwestern Pipeline Company Florida Gas Transmission Company P. O. Box 1188 Houston, Texas 77251-1188 (713) 853-3136 Joseph R. Hartsoe Leslie J. Lawner Federal Regulatory Counsel Assistant General Counsel 750 17th Street, N.W. Enron Gas Marketing, Inc. Washington, D.C. 20006-4607 P. O. Box 1188 (202) 828-3369 Houston, Texas 77251-1188 (713) 853-7629 Dated: January 13, 1993 SNR\014.j-z 5 5 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Virginia Electric and Power S Company, S Petitioner, S~- S v. § No. 92-1644 S (Not Consolidated) Federal Energy Regulatory S Commission, § - Respondent. S Northern Indiana Public S Service Company, § Petitioner, § v. § No. 93-1002 § (Not Consolidated) Federal Energy Regulatory S Commission, § Respondent. 5 Northern States Power Company § (Minnesota) and § Northern States Power Company § (Wisconsin), § Petitioners, § § v. § No. 93-1003 § (Not Consolidated) Federal Energy Regulatory § Commission, § Respondent. § Midland Cogeneration Venture S Limited Partnership, § S v. 5 No. 93-1006 S (Not Consolidated) Federal Energy Regulatory S Commission, § Respondent. S SNRlOl 4.jr 'p CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY, TRANSWESTERN PIPELINE COMPANY, FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY, AND ENRON GAS MARKETING, INC. Pursuant to Rule 26.1 of the Federal Rulesof Appellate Procedure and Local Rule 6A of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Northern Natural Gas Company ("Northern"), Transwestern Pipeline Company ("Transwesl-ern"), Florida Gas Transmission Company ("Florida Gas"), and Enron Gas Marketing, Inc. ("-EGM") (herein collectively referred to as "Enron") hereby file this corporate disclosure statement. Northern, Transwestern, and EGM are indirect wholly owned subsidiaries of Enron Corp., a publicly traded corporation. Florida Gas is a wholly owned subsidiary of Citrus Corp., which is fifty percent (50%) owned by Enron Corp. and fifty percent (50%) owned by Sonat, Inc., which is also a publicly traded corporation. Enron Corp. is affiliated with Enron Oil & Gas Company and Enron Liquids Pipeline, L.P., which are also publicly traded. Northern, Transwestern, and Florida Gas are interstate pipelines subject to the jurisdiction of the Respondent under the Natural Gas Act. Northern, Transwestern, and Florida Gas own and operate pipeline systems and facilities and perform natural gas transportation and sales services on behalf of SNHU014 j 2 7 numerous customers. Moreover, Northern, Trar-svester) and Florida Gas are impacted by Order Nos. 636, et seq. EGM is a marketer of natural gas, selling in excess of 2 Bcf per day on both a spot and long-term basis. EGM obtains its supplies from virtually every major producing-:bin in the United States, as well as from Canada, and sells gas to markets located in 37 states. In a given month, EGM moves gas on approximately 100 pipelines. EGH is a party in approximately 58 of the pipelines' restructuring proceedings required pursuant to Order Nos. 636, et sea. Respectfully submitted, G. Patrick Flowers Attorney Sherrie N. Rutherford Assistant General Counsel Legal and Regulatory Analysis Deborah A. Macdonald Vice President and General Counsel Northern Natural Gas Company Transwestern ipeline Company Florida Gas Transmission Company P. 0. Box 1188 Houston, Texas 77251-1188 (713) 853-3136 Joseph R. Hartsoe Leslie J. Lawner Federal Regulatory Counsel Assistant General Counsel 750 17th Street, N.W. Enron Gas Marketing, Inc. Washington, D.C. 20006-4607 P. 0. Box 1188 (202) 828-3369 Houston, Texas 77251-1188 (713) 853-7629 Dated: January 13, 1993 SNRM\014 .pJ 3 y CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have this day served by first- class mail, postage prepaid,. a copy of the foregoing Motion for Leave to Intervene of Northern Natural Gas Company, Transwestern Pipeline Company, Florida Gas Transmission Company, and Enron Gas Marketing, Inc. and. -tba Corporate Disclosure Statement upon the Solicitor of the-Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and upon all parties on the service list, which was compiled by the Secretary of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in Docket Nos. RM91-11-000 and RM87-34-065. Datel at Houston, Texas this 13th day of January, 1993. G. Patrick Flowers
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Availabilities
    AVAILABILITIES SOUTH TOWER NORTH TOWER 711 LOUISIANA 700 MILAM FLOOR 32 - 16,605 RSF FLOOR 29 - 21,382 RSF FLOOR 26 - 21,382 RSF FLOOR 21 - 10,715 RSF FLOOR 19 - 7,707 RSF FLOOR 17 - 4,890 RSF FLOOR 16 - 3,890 RSF FLOOR 14 - 8,348 RSF FLOOR 11 - 10,614 RSF FLOOR 12 - 20,407 RSF FLOOR 10 - 20,346 RSF FLOOR 9 - 20,484 RSF FLOOR 11 - 20,407 RSF FLOOR 8 - 20,531 RSF FLOOR 10 - 9,375 RSF FLOOR 7 - 20,429 RSF FLOOR 9 - 20,407 RSF FLOOR 8 - 20,426 RSF FLOOR 7 - 20,442 RSF FLOOR 6 - 20,458 RSF FLOOR 2 - 20,520 RSF LOBBY - 4 Spaces TUNNEL - 3 Spaces SOUTH TOWER NORTH TOWER LARGEST CONTIGUOUS BLOCK LARGEST CONTIGUOUS BLOCK FLOORS 7-10, Pt. 11: 92,404 RSF FLOORS 6-9, Pt. 10: 91,108 RSF PROPERTY FACTS Address 711 Louisianna (South Tower) | 700 Milam (North Tower) Building Class “A” office property, two (2) thirty-six (36) story towers, totaling 1,421,765 RSF Common Area Factor Approximately 15.0% (multi-tenant floors) / 9.0% (single-tenant floors) Floor Size Approximately 21,500 RSF Lease Rate Negotiable Operating Expenses Estimated 2016 Operating Expenses of $16.10 per rentable square foot Lease Term Negotiable Leasehold Improvement Allowance Negotiable Up to 0.3 spaces per 1,000 square feet leased parking available below the building comprised of 525 spaces. Unreserved $220.00 / Reserved $285.00, plus taxes Parking Up to 1.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet lease parking available in Walker @ Main Garage (tunnel access) comprised of 1,000 spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Shodalialat Jo Uoputtuojsmai
    mob, re•ANII,~J. ...he..• A1,1161111.• •••••••111.1.11 winr.d 11.1110.11, alMOINEW Irb:40141111 .11011111111. I 411•111114110 sHodalialAT jo uoputtuojsmai N 0 1 S fl 0 H IlaahTfiN '6£ al/11E110A • C861 aNsir • INhialV aDill dO NOLIVIDOSSV C—, 0E11 SALLYPORT-JUNE 1983 2 Bad Timing (anthropology); and Geoffrey 3 The Pajama Game L. Winningham '65 (photog- 7 Under Milkwood raphy); subjects to be 8 To Be Or Not To Be/ Ministry of announced. Fear 11:45 A.M. Luncheon and Annual Convo- 9 My Dinner With Andre cation, including awarding of ANNOUNCEMENT 10 Come and Get It gold medals for distinguished 14 Rashoman service. Continuing Studies 15 The Third Man / Our Man in 2:00 P.M. Rice vs. Texas A&M, Rice Transfor- The Office of Continuing Studies and Special Havana Stadium. Houston: The 16 Special Treatment (premiere) 5:00-7:00 P.M. Dance to Big Band music Metropolis, Programs offers language courses designed mation of to develop conversational skills in Spanish, 17 The Man Who Laughs courtesy of John E. Dyson the by Jeffrey Karl Ochsner French, Mandarin Chinese, Japanese, Ger- 21 Dead of Night '43 in the Grand Hall of '73. As Houston comes man, Italian, Arabic, and Russian. Daytime 22 Dr. No / Alphaville RMC. 4 College alumni invited to indi- into its own as a major American courses in intensive English as a Second Lan- 23 The Last Detail the guage (ESL)are offered at nine levels of profi- 24 Whiskey Galore vidual colleges for a cookout. city, Rice alumni are in fore- Les Mistons /Jules and Jim Evening Reunion parties, including of growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Development News Highlights MANHATTAN - MID-2ND QUARTER 2019 PLUS an OUTER BOROUGH SNAPSHOT
    Development News Highlights MANHATTAN - MID-2ND QUARTER 2019 PLUS AN OUTER BOROUGH SNAPSHOT Pictured: 315 Meserole Street Looking Ahead U.S. Treasury Releases Additional Opportunity Zones Guidelines On April 17th the U.S. Department of the Treasury issued a highly anticipated second set of proposed regulations related to the new Opportunity Zone (OZ) tax incentive. Created by the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the tax benefi t is designed to drive economic development and create jobs by encouraging long-term investments in economically distressed communities nationwide according to the Treasury department’s press release. The latest 169-page release reportedly delivered guidance in a broader range of areas than many expected, hoping to provide investors who have been on the fence with the clarity needed to begin developing projects in distressed areas nationwide. Some government offi cials anticipate the program could spur $100 billion in new investment into the more than 8,762 zones nationwide, of which 306 are located in New York City; however there exist some concerns among critics that the program will incentivize gentrifi cation, or provide added benefi t to developers for projects they would have been pursued anyway. According to the press release by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), a key part of the newly released guidance clarifi es the “substantially all” requirements for the holding period and use of the tangible business property: • For use of the property, at least 70% of the property must be used in a qualifi ed OZ. • For the holding period of the property, tangible property must be qualifi ed opportunity zone business property for at least 90% of the Qualifi ed Opportunity Fund’s (QOF) or qualifi ed OZ business’s holding period.
    [Show full text]
  • Walking Tour – Houston Building Stones Revised 10/2008 Neal Immega – N [email protected] Houston Gem and Mineral Society, Houston Geologic Society
    Walking Tour – Houston Building Stones Revised 10/2008 Neal Immega – [email protected] Houston Gem and Mineral Society, Houston Geologic Society Start at Main Street Metro North Bound (NB) on the east side of the map ‘HoustonBuildingStones WalkingTour.gif. You need to do this tour during business hours when you can get into the buildings. The whole tour takes about 90 minutes. IBC Bank – 1001 McKinney - Just inside the bld is a lobby faced with a limestone made of stoney bryozoa. Age unknown Jesse Jones Building – JPMorgan Chase 712 Main St. – built in the old style with lots of decorative stone. Outside is scored Indiana limestone. Interior has marble and colored travertine (a flowstone deposit). Esperson Building 808 Travis, 815 Walker Town Mountain Granite from Austin, Bedford oolite, marble and serpentine (Verde Antique) http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~rmr/tmg.html http://www.vermontmarbleandgranite.com/marble/vermont_verde_ant.htm Granite Building with Texas Star decoration – No name. Enter on the McKinney side. Back lighted onyx in escalator lobby. Basement has a Cretaceous rudist limestone and a Paleozoic stromatoporoid limestone. Wells Fargo Bank Building – flame cut poikilitic granite as pavement, zoned feldspars on the outside wall. Dynegy – 1400 Smith St. Black facing stone is a basic rock from Norway called Larvikite. http://www.toyen.uio.no/geomus/nettutstillinger/Osloriften/larvikitt-eng.html One Shell Plaza - 900 Louisiana Italian travertine. (Travertino Romano) Deposited by algae in freshwater hot springs. An inexpensive stone but a poor choice for an exterior stone. http://www.iltravertino.com/pagine/thecompany.html Houston City Hall – 901 Bagby Walls are Austin Stone (Cordova Shell) containing fossil shells.
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of HOUSTON Archaeological & Historical Commission Planning and Development Department
    CITY OF HOUSTON Archaeological & Historical Commission Planning and Development Department PROTECTED LANDMARK DESIGNATION REPORT LANDMARK NAME: Mr. and Mrs. S.I. Morris House AGENDA ITEM: D.1 OWNER: S.I. Morris Interests, Ltd. HPO FILE NO.: 15PL124 APPLICANT: David K. Morris DATE ACCEPTED: Apr-15-2015 LOCATION: 2 Waverly Court – Museum District HAHC HEARING DATE: May-21-2015 SITE INFORMATION Lot 2, Waverly Court, City of Houston, Harris County, Texas. The site includes a historic two-story, contemporary style single-family residence facing west on Waverly Court at the corner of Bissonnet Street. TYPE OF APPROVAL REQUESTED: Protected Landmark Designation HISTORY AND SIGNIFICANCE SUMMARY The Mr. and Mrs. S.I. Morris House is a contemporary residence at 2 Waverly Court in the Museum District south of downtown Houston. The house was designed by prominent Houston architect Seth Irwin “S.I.” Morris, Jr. (1914-2006) and completed in 1952 as his family’s home. Morris’ firms – Wilson, Morris & Crain, AIA; Wilson, Morris, Crain & Anderson, AIA; S.I. Morris Associates; Morris*Aubry Architects and Morris Architects – left a timeless imprint on Houston through their crucial roles in creating such treasured landmarks as the Astrodome (1965), Pennzoil Place (1976), Transco (now Williams) Tower (1983) and Gus S. Wortham Theater Center (1987), among many others. In Building A Houston Practice: The Career of S.I. Morris, Barry Moore notes that Morris insisted the only building he had ever personally designed was the house built at the corner of Waverly Court and Bissonnet in the 1950s. That house remains in the Morris family and is home to the architect’s widow, Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • 35 Years of One Shell Plaza
    iiiiiilliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiini IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII =IIB ••••••••••••••••••iiiiiiiiiini i ........ aasS§| iiiiiiimiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiui IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIBIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII /flffllfllfff IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII fllllllflllll firfiffiifin IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIRII /ifffiffifiii llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll fiifiiifiini "?ffiiiifiii 1111111111111111111111111111111 »lfffifilllii nmmun «lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll i«»ni llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll s llllllllllmmmllllllllmll IHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIl IIIIIIIIHIIIIIIIIIHimillllll ^IIIIEPIIIll till Ellililllllll llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Ss lllllllllllllllllllllllltlllllll railllllllllBl^llllJIIll I '0^4 CITE 67 : SUMMER 2006 25 35 Years of One Shell Plaza Once the world's tallest concrete building, One Shell Plaza still has lessons to teach INTERVIEW W I T H J O S E P H C O L A C O BY W I L L I A M F. S T E R N A N D C H R I S T O F S P I E L E R When it wus finished m Il>7l, One Shell tin this project, research that has served beams welded together at very, very close the post modern movement came about. Plaza was the world's tallest concrete the industry well over many, many years. S[\K nig. I he World 11.ufe i enter had Before that we had basically a Miesi.m- building. The 7IS-foot, 50-story build- And then when I moved ro Houston in columns that were three-feet-four-inches type design, which some call International ing, which fills the block bounded by I4f>^, the building was just about fin- on center on the outside and a very deep Style, buildings were fairly regular. They Louisiana. Smith. Walker, and McKinney. ished. For the last 3.5 years, I have been spandrel beam. F.ssenrially, you could were rectangular, ihey prcttv much went was also Gerald D.
    [Show full text]
  • DOWNTOWN the OAKS Hobby Airport 24 M I N
    THE WOODLANDS KINGWOOD TOMBALL SPRING ATSCOCITA 290 HUMBLE LOCATION WILLOWBROOK 59 CYPRESS 90 6 The Heights 15 min. IAH 99 River Oaks 17 min. 45 West University Place 14 min. Memorial 23 min. 290 59 90 The Galleria 16 min. THE Tanglewood 17 min. HEIGHTS 10 KATY MEMORIAL 10 The Medical Center 19 min. 610 TANGLEWOOD RIVER DOWNTOWN THE OAKS Hobby Airport 24 m i n . GALLERIA WEST George Bush Intercontinental UNIVERSITY 27 m i n. THE Airport (IAH) PLACE MEDICAL PORT OF CENTER HOUSTON 610 Sugar Land 27 m i n. 59 Port of Houston 40 min. Trinity Bay 99 Baybrook 32 min. HOBBY AIRPORT 90 Katy 37 min. 45 Cypress 35 min. Galveston Bay 288 SUGAR LAND BAYBROOK The Woodlands 36 min. 59 6 PEARLAND Kingwood 38 min. 65,720 150,000 22 residents currently live employees work Hotels downtown downtown (2 mile radius) 11 2,936 220,000 million people attend downtown Houston new residential units people visit downtown culture and entertainment planned or under on a daily basis attractions annually construction 1.2 million 7, 300 1,500 43.7 million 1.5 million people stay in downtown hotel rooms new hotel rooms SF of existing SF of office under Houston hotels annually under construction office space construction MAJOR EMPLOYERS Franklin Franklin Lofts? Old Cotton Islamic Hermann The Corinthian Harris Exchange Dawah Center Harris Lofts County County Family Law Harris Garage Center County Foley Sally’s Hotel Icon Congress Plaza Civil Courthouse George Bush Building (Jury Assembly) House Monument Congress Market Market 1414 Square Congress Garage Square Houston Hamilton Street Sesquicentennial Harris County Ballet Park Residences Majestic 1910 Courthouse Harris County Park Metro Harris County Juvenile Justice Admin.
    [Show full text]
  • Offering Summary Investment Overview
    HOUSTON DOWNTOWN OFFERING SUMMARY INVESTMENT OVERVIEW HFF is pleased to offer on an exclusive basis the opportunity to acquire the fee-simple interest in the 350-room Doubletree Downtown Houston (“Property” or “Hotel”), prominently situated within Allen Center – an institutional-quality mixed-use office/retail/hotel complex – in the Houston CBD. The Hotel is strategically located near many of Houston’s top demand drivers including the George R. Brown Convention Center, Minute Maid Park (home of the Houston Astros), Toyota Center (home of the Houston Rockets) and over 51 million square feet of office space within a 1-mile radius. Many of the Fortune 500 companies located in Houston are within blocks of the Property, including Deloitte, Chevron and KBR. The Property is being offered fully unencumbered from both brand and management, presenting the next owner with a completely blank slate. With an irreplaceable location within Houston’s CBD core and strong in-place cash flow, the DoubleTree offers investors a unique, unencumbered opportunity with tremendous upside potential. INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTS UNIQUE DOWNTOWN HOUSTON LOCATION The Property boasts an enviable location within Allen Center in Houston’s CBD, benefiting from downtown’s diversified demand base – not only corporate but also convention, sports, leisure, culture, medical, university/ education – and pedestrian friendly environment. This ideal mix of demand drivers has allowed the CBD to TWO ALLEN CENTER 1 MILLION SF continually outperform Houston’s overall market, as well as the
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Market Overview 2017 Third Quarter
    Quarterly Market Overview For more information, please contact: David Mendel, Public Relations Manager 2017 Third Quarter Phone: 713.629.1900 ext. 258 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE E‐mail: [email protected] HOUSTON’S OFFICE MARKET RECOVERY SLOW, INDUSTRIAL DEMAND REMAINS HIGH HOUSTON — (October 18, 2017) — Houston’s commercial real estate market is optimistic after grappling with Hurricane Harvey amid the continued energy recovery, according to quarterly market research compiled by Commercial Gateway, the commercial division of the Houston Association of Realtors (HAR). For office space, direct negative net absorption of 39,995 square feet was recorded; Class A and C showed positive absorption of 246,119 square feet and 18,230 square feet, respectively, while Class B reported negative absorption of 304,344 square feet. Move-ins at 609 Main including four different firms who preleased space in the new building accounted for almost 263,000 square feet of the Class A positive absorption. Year-to-date overall totals are positive for the year primarily due to the first quarter occupancy of 600,000 square feet by BHP Billiton in its new headquarters building, although the firm is leaving behind more than 320,000 square feet that is currently on the sublease market. Space left behind by various firms occupying new properties along with sublease spaces converting to direct space will continue to affect the vacancy rate. The current 16.7% direct vacancy rate is unchanged from last quarter, but up from the 15.5% recorded during the same quarter in 2016. Class A space overall is 16.0% vacant, Class B is 19.1% vacant and Class C is 11.4% vacant.
    [Show full text]
  • Arnold Fisher Senior Partner, Fisher Brothers Honorary Chairman, Intrepid Fallen Heroes Fund
    Arnold Fisher Senior Partner, Fisher Brothers Honorary Chairman, Intrepid Fallen Heroes Fund Arnold Fisher is a Senior Partner at Fisher Brothers, one of the city’s largest and most respected real estate firms. Among his contributions to the New York City skyline have been such signature buildings as 299 Park Avenue, 605 Third Avenue, 1345 Avenue of the Americas, Park Avenue Plaza, Imperial House and 50 Sutton Place South. Arnold became Chairman of the Board of the Intrepid Air, Sea and Space Museum Foundation in May 2003 and served through December 2006. Centered around the historic aircraft carrier Intrepid, the Foundation educates 700,000 annual visitors about sea, air and space history and technology. The Foundation serves as a monument for all who have served in our nation’s defense. He also spearheaded the efforts of the Intrepid Fallen Heroes Fund (IFHF), which provided financial support for spouses and children of fallen U.S. service members. The Fund changed direction and constructed The Center for the Intrepid, a state-of-the-art physical rehabilitation center at Brooke Army Medical Center in San Antonio, Texas, which opened in January, 2007. Arnold also led the construction of the National Intrepid Center of Excellence, in Bethesda, Maryland, which opened in June, 2010. NICoE is a 72,000 square foot, two-story facility located on the Navy campus in Bethesda, Maryland, adjacent to the new Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. NICoE is designed to provide the most advanced diagnostics, initial treatment plan and family education, introduction to therapeutic modalities, referral and reintegration support for military personnel and veterans with traumatic brain injury (TBI), post-traumatic stress (PTS) and complex psychological health issues.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Labeled Buildings List Final Feb6 Bystate
    ENERGY STAR® Qualified Buildings and Manufacturing Plants As of December 31, 2007 Building/Plant Name City State Building/Plant Type Alabama Calhoun County Administration Building Anniston AL Courthouse Calhoun County Court House Anniston AL Courthouse 10044 Birmingham AL Office Alabama Operations Center Birmingham AL Office BellSouth City Center Birmingham AL Office Birmingham Homewood TownePlace Suites by Marriott Birmingham AL Hotel/Motel Roberta Plant Calera AL Cement Plant Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC Lincoln AL Auto Assembly Plant Alaska Elmendorf AFB, 3MDG, DoD/VA Joint Venture Hospital Elmendorf Air Force Base AK Hospital Arizona 311QW - Phoenix Chandler Courtyard Chandler AZ Hotel/Motel Bashas' Chandler AZ Supermarket/Grocery Bashas' Food City Chandler AZ Supermarket/Grocery Phoenix Cement Clarkdale AZ Cement Plant Flagstaff Embassy Suites Flagstaff AZ Hotel/Motel Fort Defiance Indian Hospital Fort Defiance AZ Hospital 311K5 - Phoenix Mesa Courtyard Mesa AZ Hotel/Motel 100 North 15th Avenue Building Phoenix AZ Office 1110 West Washington Building Phoenix AZ Office 24th at Camelback Phoenix AZ Office 311JF - Phoenix Camelback Courtyard Phoenix AZ Hotel/Motel 311K3 - Courtyard Phoenix Airport Phoenix AZ Hotel/Motel 311K4 - Phoenix North Courtyard Phoenix AZ Hotel/Motel 3131 East Camelback Phoenix AZ Office 57442 - Phoenix Airport Residence Inn Phoenix AZ Hotel/Motel Arboleda Phoenix AZ Office Bashas' Food City Phoenix AZ Supermarket/Grocery Biltmore Commerce Center Phoenix AZ Office Biltmore Financial Center I Phoenix AZ
    [Show full text]
  • Pipeline Transportation and Underground
    Docket No. RP16-___-000 Exhibit No. ANR-012 Page 1 of 17 Additions to Capacity on the U.S. Natural Gas Pipeline Network: 2005 This report examines the amount of new natural gas pipeline capacity added to the U.S. natural gas pipeline system during 2005 and the areas of the country where those additions were concentrated. In addition, it discusses and analyzes proposed natural gas pipeline projects that may be developed between 2006 and 2008 and the market factors supporting these initiatives. Questions or comments on the contents of this article should be directed to James Tobin at [email protected] or (202) 586-4835. The addition to natural gas pipeline capacity in 2005 It appears, however, that 2004 and 2005 may be the bottom exceeded that of 2004 (Figure 1) although fewer miles of of a temporary trough in the natural gas pipeline development pipeline were installed (Figure 2). Miles of new natural gas activity cycle. The current inventory of announced or pipeline (1,152) were 21 percent less than in 2004, even approved natural gas pipeline projects indicates that natural though pipeline capacity grew by 8.2 billion cubic feet per gas pipeline capacity additions could increase significantly day (Bcf/d), a 7-percent increase in capacity additions (see between 2006 and 2008 (Figure 1). Several factors are Box, “Capacity Measures,” p. 4). Indeed, less new natural driving this anticipated growth, particularly the expanding gas pipeline mileage was added in 2005 than in any year development of natural gas production in the Fort Worth during the past decade.1 Basin of east Texas and the Piceance/Unita Basins of western Colorado and eastern Utah, and the need for natural gas Figure 1.
    [Show full text]