Ruling: Israel Cannot Exempt Itself from Compensating Palestinians Harmed by Military | the Electronic Intifada

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ruling: Israel Cannot Exempt Itself from Compensating Palestinians Harmed by Military | the Electronic Intifada Ruling: Israel cannot exempt itself from compensating Palestinians harmed by military | The Electronic Intifada THE ELECTRONIC INTIFADA NEWS & ANALYSIS ACTION & ACTIVISM THE MEDIA EI EXTRA BLOGS اانتفاضة اإلكترونية HUMAN RIGHTS Ruling: Israel cannot exempt itself from Your support helps us tell compensating Palestinians harmed by Palestine’s stories every day. military Donate Now Adalah 12 December 2006 News & Analysis Opinion/Editorial Israel Lobby Watch Human Rights Internet & Technology Business & Economy Development Action & Activism Activism News Action Items The Media Journalists in Danger Palestinians inspect the remains of the house belonging to a Hamas activist after it Role of the Media was hit in an Israeli air strike in the northern Gaza Strip, 16 November 2006. Coverage Trends (MaanImages/Wesam Saleh) EI Extra Diaries: Live from Supreme Court Cancels Racist Law, Ruling that Palestinians Palestine Harmed by Israeli Military in the Occupied Palestinian Art, Music & Culture Territories are Eligible for Compensation from Israel Blogs Attorney Hassan Jabareen, the General Director of Adalah: “The Activism and BDS Beat Supreme Court’s decision nullifed one of the most racist laws al Bassaleh legislated by the Knesset in the last fve years. After this decision, Arts and Culture Palestinians who have been injured or killed, or who have sustained From the Editors property damage, outside the context of a so-called combat Ruling Israel cannot exempt itself from compensating Palestinians harmed by military The Electronic Intifada.htm[7-10-2014 11:17:01] Ruling: Israel cannot exempt itself from compensating Palestinians harmed by military | The Electronic Intifada Lobby Watch situation, can again submit tort cases for compensation in Israeli Media Watch courts against the security forces. However, we foresee in the future Power Suits another legal battle on the question of what is the scope of Rights and Accountability combat operations.” Ali Abunimah Today, 12 December 2006, the Supreme Court of Israel, in a Nora Barrows-Friedman unanimous ruling delivered by nine justices, decided that the State Rania Khalek of Israel cannot exempt itself from paying compensation to Patrick Strickland Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza who have been harmed by Sarah Irving the Israeli military. The decision invalidates a provision of a recent Adri Nieuwhof amendment to the Civil Wrongs (Liability of the State) Law Maureen Clare Murphy (popularly known as “the Intifada law”). This provision was intended Charlotte Silver to release the state from all liability for compensation for any David Cronin damages caused to Palestinians by the Israeli military or other Ayah Bashir security forces in areas designated as “confict zones” (nearly all of the West Bank and Gaza) by the Ministry of Defense. As a result of Writers this ruling, Palestinians who have been harmed by the Israeli Patrick O. Strickland military since September 2000 can again seek compensation in Rami Almeghari Israeli courts. Sarah Irving Joe Catron Writing for the Court, Chief Justice Aharon Barak stated that this law Rod Such exempts the state from liability in tort for any damages caused by Charlotte Silver the security forces, even though these damages do not fall within Budour Youssef Hassan the context of combat operations. The law exempts the state from Sawsan Khalife' tort liability in circumstances which have nothing to do with security. Stephanie Westbrook It violates rights disproportionately - the rights to life, dignity, and Rania Khalek property of Palestinians in the Occupied Territories - and is Maureen Clare Murphy therefore unconstitutional. Daryl Meador Moe Ali Nayel However, the Supreme Court also decided not to strike down Joseph Massad another provision of the law that provides that Israel does not have Dylan Collins to pay compensation for damages caused in military operations David Sheen since September 2000, for “a citizen of an Enemy State” and “an David Lloyd activist or member of a Terrorist Organization.” The Court left this Mutawalli Abou Nasser provision intact but open for future legal challenges, ruling that the Max Blumenthal petitioners did not bring enough factual material before the Court Yves Engler concerning the applicability of this provision. Therefore, in the Khaled Alashqar future, individuals can bring cases before the Israeli courts to Anne Paq challenge the constitutionality of this provision. Ilan Pappe Ruling Israel cannot exempt itself from compensating Palestinians harmed by military The Electronic Intifada.htm[7-10-2014 11:17:01] Ruling: Israel cannot exempt itself from compensating Palestinians harmed by military | The Electronic Intifada Jehan Bseiso The petition was submitted on 1 September 2005 by Adalah, Adriana Maestas HaMoked: Center for the Defence of the Individual and the Association for Civil Rights in Israel, in their own names and in the names of Al-Haq (West Bank), The Palestinian Center for Human Rights (Gaza), B’Tselem, Physicians for Human Rights - Israel, The Public Committee Against Torture in Israel , and Rabbis for Human Rights, by Adalah Attorneys Hassan Jabareen and Orna Kohn, HaMoked Attorneys Yossi Wolfson and Gil Gan-Mor, and ACRI Attorney Dan Yakir. The petitioners challenged the amendments to the Civil Wrongs Law, which were passed by the Knesset at the end of July 2005. These amendments deny residents of the 1967 Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPTs), citizens of “Enemy States” and activists or members of a “Terrorist Organization” the right to compensation for damages caused to them by the Israeli security forces, even those damages caused to them outside of the context of a military operation (with some minor exceptions). The amended law granted the Minister of Defense the authority to proclaim any area outside of the State of Israel a “Confict Zone,” even if no war-related activity has taken place there. This proclamation denied those who sustain injury within the area the right to seek compensation from Israeli courts. The law was also meant to operate retroactively in cases of damages sustained since 29 September 2000, the date of the outbreak of the Second Intifada, and for claims already pending in the courts. In the petition, the organizations emphasized that the law grossly violates the fundamental principles of international humanitarian law and international human rights law, which apply in the OPTs. It also breaches basic rights in contravention of Israel’s Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty, and is therefore unconstitutional. The petitioners further argued that the Law sends out a dangerous and extreme message that the lives and rights of those injured in a “Confict Zone” have no value, as the courts will not come to their aid, and those who caused their injuries will face no punishment. As a result, the Law is both immoral and racist. The petitioners also argued that the articles of the Law de facto terminate the monitoring of the Israeli military’s activities in the OPTs, discourage investigations Ruling Israel cannot exempt itself from compensating Palestinians harmed by military The Electronic Intifada.htm[7-10-2014 11:17:01] Ruling: Israel cannot exempt itself from compensating Palestinians harmed by military | The Electronic Intifada and bringing those responsible for cases of death or injury before the courts, including in cases in which damages were caused by the random or deliberate opening of fre, torture and abuse, and looting and theft of civilian property. The Law thus violates the fundamental rights to life, bodily integrity, equality, dignity and property, as well as the constitutional right of access to the courts. The petition stressed that the violations entailed by the law are gross, as they deny in a sweeping manner the awarding of any remedy for the breach of fundamental rights, and that this denial is tantamount to a denial of the rights themselves. The petitioners asked the Supreme Court to determine that the Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty applies to all residents of the area under effective Israeli control. The Court has recently determined, in its decision regarding the Israeli government’s “Disengagement Plan” from the Gaza Strip that the Basic Law applies to Israeli settlers living in the OPTs. Therefore, a decision that the Basic Law does not apply to Palestinians in the OPTs would create a constitutional regime of “apartheid.” The petitioners also dealt with one of the central claims put forward by the initiators of the law, that each party must bear the costs for its own damages: the State of Israel bears the costs of damages sustained by its citizens, and the Palestinians will carry the burden for damages incurred by Palestinians. The petitioners contended that this sweeping principle not only has no basis in international law, but also relies on the assumption of equivalence in power between the Israelis and Palestinians, as two independent states, or at least two political entities, with no relationship of domination and subordination. This logic, however, ignores the clear and obvious reality that the relationship between the two sides is that of an occupying power and a protected population under occupation, and that the occupying power is obliged to apply the norms of international humanitarian law and international human rights law, and afford protection to the civilians in the OPTs. Related Links Adalah: The Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel Ruling Israel cannot exempt itself from compensating Palestinians harmed by
Recommended publications
  • Examining Mondoweiss Blog Activists' Claims-Making and Protest
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2016 The trs ategic use of The aF ce of Apartheid: examining Mondoweiss blog activists’ claims- making and protest activities over the Scarlett Johansson and SodaStream controversy Divinity Bridget O'connor-De Losrios Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation O'connor-De Losrios, Divinity Bridget, "The trs ategic use of The aF ce of Apartheid: examining Mondoweiss blog activists’ claims- making and protest activities over the Scarlett oJ hansson and SodaStream controversy" (2016). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 15987. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/15987 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The strategic use of The Face of Apartheid: Examining Mondoweiss blog activists’ claims- making and protest activities over the Scarlett Johansson and SodaStream controversy by Divinity Bridget O’Connor-DeLosRios A dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major: Sociology Program of Study Committee: Abdi Kusow, Major Professor Daniel Krier Paul Lasley Robert Mazur Susan Stewart Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2016 Copyright © Divinity Bridget O’Connor-DeLosRios, 2016. All rights reserved. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii ABSTRACT iv CHAPTER 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Correlates in Anti-Semitic Incidents on College Campuses in the U.S. Jessica Morris
    Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Master’s Theses and Projects College of Graduate Studies 5-2017 Identifying Correlates in Anti-Semitic Incidents on College Campuses in the U.S. Jessica Morris Follow this and additional works at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/theses Part of the Criminology Commons Recommended Citation Morris, Jessica. (2017). Identifying Correlates in Anti-Semitic Incidents on College Campuses in the U.S.. In BSU Master’s Theses and Projects. Item 47. Available at http://vc.bridgew.edu/theses/47 Copyright © 2017 Jessica Morris This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. Jessica Morris Candidate Criminal Justice Department This thesis is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Thesis Committee: Dr. Carolyn Petrosino, Chairperson Dr. Jamie Huff Dr. Mia Ortiz ii Identifying Correlates in Anti-Semitic Incidents on College Campuses in the U.S. by JESSICA MORRIS THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Criminal Justice Bridgewater State University Bridgewater, Massachusetts May, 2017 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge Dr. Carolyn Petrosino, my advisor and thesis chair, for her support and encouragement throughout my education at Bridgewater State. It has been a long several months of prepping, writing and rewriting these chapters. Her guidance will be with me as I continue my research in the coming years. I also thank my committee members, Dr. Jamie Huff and Dr. Mia Ortiz, for their valued criticisms and valued opinions in my professional development.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Anti-Israel Boycotts, from the Arab League to BDS
    War by Other Means A History of Anti-Israel Boycotts, From the Arab League to BDS David May January 2020 FOUNDATION FOR DEFENSE OF DEMOCRACIES FOUNDATION Cover Illustration: Daniel Ackerman / FDD The top image depicts protesters during a pro-Palestinian demonstration in Paris on August 2, 2014. The bottom image depicts Arab soldiers marching during Israel's 1948 War of Independence. (Photos by Dominique Faget / AFP via Getty Images; John Phillips / The LIFE Picture Collection via Getty Images) War by Other Means A History of Anti-Israel Boycotts, From the Arab League to BDS David May January 2020 FDD PRESS A division of the FOUNDATION FOR DEFENSE OF DEMOCRACIES Washington, DC War by Other Means: A History of Anti-Israel Boycotts, From the Arab League to BDS Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 6 THE RISE AND FALL OF THE ARAB BOYCOTT ............................................................................ 7 BDS ORIGINS, 2001-2004 .................................................................................................................... 10 THE BDS CALL ..................................................................................................................................... 13 WHAT DOES BDS WANT? .................................................................................................................. 14 THE BDS NGO NETWORK ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 12 December 2016 Submission of NGO Monitor for Adoption of the List
    1 Ben-Maimon Blvd. Jerusalem, Israel 92262 Phone: +972-2-566-1020 Fax: +972-77-511-7030 [email protected] www.ngo-monitor.org 12 December 2016 Submission of NGO Monitor for Adoption of the List of Issues Prior to Reporting for the Netherlands Recommendations: Include as part of the List of Issues for the Netherlands to comment on the increase in antisemitic and anti-Israel discourse in the political arena, the media, and NGOs funded by the Dutch government. Please indicate whether the Netherlands has conducted campaigns to raise public awareness and to combat antisemitic behavior and anti-Israel incitement. Include as part of the List of Issues what concrete steps have been taken by the Netherlands, including regulatory reforms and legislation, to prevent antisemitism and anti-Israel national origin discrimination in all settings, including funding to NGOs. Include as part of the List of Issues what efforts have been made by the Netherlands to provide effective remedies for victims of antisemitism and anti- Israel national origin discrimination. Include as part of the List of Issues what steps have been taken by the Netherlands to prohibit direct and indirect support to designated terrorist organizations, in all settings, including funding to NGOs linked to those organizations. Recommend to the Netherlands, in the concluding observations on the state party report, that legislation be enacted prohibiting the promotion of antisemitism and national origin discrimination in all settings, without exception. Recommend to the Netherlands in the concluding observations on the state party report, that legislation be enacted prohibiting any funding and/or support to designated terrorist organizations in all settings, including funding to NGOs linked to those organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • December 5, 2013 Dutch Support for BDS Campaigns: ICCO - Interchurch Organization for Development and Cooperation
    December 5, 2013 Dutch Support for BDS Campaigns: ICCO - Interchurch Organization for Development and Cooperation Background ICCO (Interchurch Organization for Development and Cooperation) is a Dutch church-based non-governmental organization that receives large scale funding from the Dutch government. The Dutch government also views ICCO as an important partner in the Middle East. This relationship is very concerning. Research shows that ICCO pursues a biased and politicized agenda regarding Israel, as seen in its statements, publications, promotion of BDS (boycott, divestment, and sanctions) that immorally single out Israel, and funding for radical NGOs. ICCO’s activities in the region and its funding for Israeli, Palestinian and international partner NGOs have been the subject of numerous parliamentary discussions. Following the increased criticism, including NGO Monitor reports, ICCO has significantly decreased its transparency. Therefore, its NGO funding is largely hidden from further debate. The Dutch government and parliament inquired about ICCO’s funding for Electronic Intifada, an anti-Israel website that leads boycott and other public campaigns against Israel. Despite objections from the Dutch government, ICCO stated that it did not change its policy of funding Electronic Intifada and other BDS organizations. Due to the severe lack of transparency, it is not known whether ICCO continues to fund other radical grantees such as Badil. Such secrecy regarding NGO funding and activity is anti-democratic and goes against the principles of good governance. Funding In 2012, the Dutch Government provided ICCO with €82 million or 84% of its total budget for that year. ICCO also received €5,310,874 from the EU, meaning approximately 90% of ICCO’s budget is from government entities.
    [Show full text]
  • Ngos, Antisemitism, and Government Funding
    NGOS, ANTISEMITISM, AND GOVERNMENT FUNDING: NGO MONITOR’S REPORT TO THE 2015 GLOBAL FORUM ON ANTISEMITSM May 2015 NGOs, Antisemitism and Government Funding: NGO Monitor’s Report to the 2015 Global Forum on Antisemitism May 2015 NGO Monitor's mission is to provide information and analysis, promote accountability, and support discussion on the reports and activities of NGOs claiming to advance human rights and humanitarian agendas. 1 Ben-Maimon Blvd. Jerusalem 92262, Israel Tel: +972-2-566-1020 Fax: +972-77-511-7030 [email protected] www.ngo-monitor.org ע"ר ) .INTRODUCTIONNGO Monitor is a project of the Amutah for NGO Responsibility R.A #058560085) Organization in Special Consultative Status with the UN Economic and Social Council since 2013 © 2015 NGO Monitor. All rights reserved. NGOs, Antisemitism and Government Funding ntisemitism is a very virulent and enduring form of racism that has unfortunately been reemerging to levels not seen since the 1930s, in the period leading up to the Holocaust. Throughout Europe, Jews have been deliberately targeted, violently attacked and murdered at Asynagogues, schools, kosher markets, and museums. Jews wearing yarmulkes (skull caps) or other religious markings are subject to harassment and violence. Crowds at soccer matches chant “Jews to the gas” and other genocidal taunts. Mass demonstrations in European capitals, ostensibly to protest Israeli actions towards the Palestinians, are rife with antisemitic and Nazi sloganeering and imagery. University campuses have seen extreme targeting and singling out of Jews. In Iran, state-sponsored Holocaust denial and calls to “wipe Israel off the map” are entrenched. Arab media is filled with vitriolic antisemitism and blood libels.
    [Show full text]
  • The Positioning of Web-Based Media Watchdogs in the Coverage of the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict: a Bourdieusian Analysis
    THE POSITIONING OF WEB-BASED MEDIA WATCHDOGS IN THE COVERAGE OF THE PALESTINIAN-ISRAELI CONFLICT: A BOURDIEUSIAN ANALYSIS A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2017 Amani Lowey School of Arts, Languages and Cultures CONTENTS ABSTRACT p. 5 DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT STATEMENT p. 6 DEDICATION p. 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS p. 8 INTRODUCTION p. 9-23 CHAPTER 1. METHODOLOGY p. 24-38 1.1 Rationale p. 24-27 1.2 Situating the Project p. 27-28 1.3 Data Profile and Criteria p. 28-38 CHAPTER 2. OLD AND NEW MEDIA PERSPECTIVES ON THE p. 39-73 MIDDLE-EASTERN CONFLICT 2.1 Published Reports and Research-based Publications on p. 40-66 Media Bias in Reporting the Middle East Conflict in Old Media 2.1.1 Professional Journalists’ Accounts p. 41-48 2.1.2 Scholarly Research on the BBC and the New York Times p. 48-57 2.1.3 Published reports by organisations or individuals: The Case of the BBC p. 57-66 2.2 New Media, an Overview p. 66-73 CHAPTER 3. A FRAMEWORK FOR APPLYING BOURDIEUSIAN CONCEPTS p.74-104 IN THE CONTEXT OF THE MIDDLE-EAST CONFLICT 3.1 Situating Bourdieu and Assessing his Theory of Practice p. 75-86 3.2 Bourdieu in Media Studies p. 86-91 3.3 Mapping the field p. 92-95 3.4 Bourdieusian concepts tested against Gramsci’s p. 96-104 Hegemony and Herman Chomsky’s ‘Propaganda Model’ 2 CHAPTER 4. SAMPLE DATA ANALYSIS p. 105-110 CHAPTER 5.
    [Show full text]
  • The+New+Anti-Semites.Pdf
    = How the Delegitimization Campaign Against Israel Drives Hatred and Violence in America Endorsed by Authored by Endorsed by The New Antisemites How the Delegitimization Campaign Against Israel Drives Hatred and Violence in America Foreword by Marc Greendorfer Scan, Read, Share! Authored by: Zachor Legal Institute StopAntiSemitism.org Endorsed by: Simon Wiesenthal Center StandWithUs ZOA HADASSAH Museum of Tolerance Zionist Organization of America PragerU NA'AMAT USA AEPi - Alpha Epsilon Pi OU - Orthodox Union MEF - Middle East Forum EMET - Endowment Lawfare Project Rabbinical Council for Middle East Truth of America AISH HaTorah Americans Against APT - Americans for Peace CJV - Coalition Los Angeles Antisemitism and Tolerance for Jewish Values IAF - Israel Allies Jewish Policy JIMENA - Jews Indigenous to the SSI - Students Foundation Center Middle East and North A!ica Supporting Israel AICE - The American-Israeli WIZO - Women's March of the Living SPME - Scholars for CLUB Z Cooperative Enterprise International Zionist Peace in the Middle East Organization Alums for Campus National Council of B'NAI B'RITH Haym Salomon Young Jewish Fairness Young Israel INTERNATIONAL Center Conservatives IAC4Action DOC EMET The Israel Forever Emunah PRODUCTIONS Foundation of America AFSI - Americans For A Safe Israel The World Values AMIT Jewish War Veterans Network of the United States CAS - Combat Israel Christian David Horowitz Freedom Fuente Latina Antisemitism NEXUS Center A Wider Bridge ARISE - Alliance to Reinforce LCI - Latino CJUI - Christians
    [Show full text]