Hybrid-Electric Vehicle Design and Applications Eric Adams

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hybrid-Electric Vehicle Design and Applications Eric Adams Rochester Institute of Technology RIT Scholar Works Theses Thesis/Dissertation Collections 1995 Hybrid-electric vehicle design and applications Eric Adams Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses Recommended Citation Adams, Eric, "Hybrid-electric vehicle design and applications" (1995). Thesis. Rochester Institute of Technology. Accessed from This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Thesis/Dissertation Collections at RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hybrid-Electric Vehicle Design and Applications by Eric E. Adams A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering Approved by: Professor Alan Nige Thesis Advisor Professor _ Professor _ Professor _ Department Head Department of Mechanical Engineering College of Engineering Rochester Institute of Technology December 1995 I, Eric Adams, hereby grant permission to the Wallace Memorial Library of the Rochester Institute. of Technology in Rochester, NY, to reproduce my thesis entitled, Hybrid Electric Vehicle Design and Applications, in whole or in part. Any and all reproductions will not be for commercial use or profit. Eric E. Adams Abstract: This paper discusses the considerations involved in hybrid-electric vehicle design. The tradeoffs between issues such as drive scheme/arrangement, motor choice, batteries, and temperature control are investigated. The technologies and components which are currently available, and those which are likely in the near future, are described. A sport utility vehicle is taken as a specific case study because they are very popular and relatively inefficient. Calculations indicate that a hybrid sport utility vehicle with all wheel drive is feasible using existing components. The next generation vehicle using new technologies is also predicted. Preface: The past decades have made the internal combustion engine the standard power source for vehicles. However, at the turn of the twentieth century there was much more variety with steam, electric, and gasoline power competing nearly equally. Electric vehicles were popular because they were quiet and clean, but they had short range and were only common in cities. Steam power was used for heavy duty jobs, but both steam and gas powered vehicles were dirty and difficult to operate. Ironically, it was the development of the electric starter motor which allowed easy operation of gasoline powered vehicles, and thus sealed the fate of early electric vehicles. One hundred years later, the transportation industry is again facing change. The petroleum reserves which have kept gasoline inexpensive are dwindling, and the air pollution which has been a constant side effect of internal combustion is now affecting the health of the population. This has brought electric vehicles back to the forefront of vehicle development, despite the fact that they still suffer from some of the same energy storage problems as their ancestors. The hybrid-electric vehicle has been developed as an method of addressing energy storage issues and improving the usefulness of the electric drivetrain. The delay in electric vehicle development is partly technical (batteries), but is mostly political. The petroleum industry and the Big 3 automakers have invested enormous amounts of money developing the current system, and they are loathe to change the business they have dominated for so long. Many small companies are rushing to fill the demand that the major automakers are stubbornly ignoring, and the next few years will bring many unique vehicles from a variety of sources. Table of Contents: Abstract: i Preface: ii Table of Contents: iii List of Figures: vi List of Tables: vii List of Abbreviations: viii Introduction: 1 Hybrid Design Overview: 5 Fundamental Question: 5 APU: 6 Drive Schemes: 9 Series: 9 Parallel: 13 EV Comparison: 16 Regeneration: 17 Battery Configuration: 19 Motors: 21 Climate Control: 24 Chassis: 27 Summary: 28 Technology Overview: 29 Batteries: 29 Electrochemical: 31 Flywheels: 41 Ultracapacitors: 42 Others: 44 Battery Comparison: 45 Motors: 46 DC Motors: 46 AC Motors: 49 Special Motors: 52 Alternative Fuels: 53 Reformulated Gasoline: 53 Natural Gas: 54 Propane: 55 Alcohol Fuels: 56 Hydrogen: 57 Summary: 58 Auxiliary Power Units: 60 Combustion Engines: 60 Fuel Cells: 66 Direct Conversion: 69 Summary: 70 Case Study: 72 All Wheel Drive: 74 Sport Utility Vehicle Definition: 76 Hybrid SUV: 78 Hybrid All Wheel Drive: 81 Series Scheme #1 : 82 Series Scheme #2; 85 Series Scheme #3: 89 IV Series Scheme #4: 91 Parallel Scheme #1 93 Parallel Scheme #2. 95 Parallel Scheme #3. 98 Battery Enclosure: 100 Calculations: 102 Road Loads: 103 Aerodynamics: 103 Rolling Resistance: 106 Roadway Grades: 109 Total Road Load: 111 Acceleration: 113 Other Losses: 114 Towing: 115 Battery Storage: 116 ZEV Range: 116 AAWD: 117 Fuel Consumption: 119 Results: 120 Design Solutions: 122 Near-Term Hybrid: 122 Mid-Term Hybrid: 124 Long-term Solution: 127 Conclusions: 129 Bibliography: 131 References: 135 Appendix: 154 List of Figures: Figure 1 APU Load-Leveling 7 Figure 2 Schematic of Series Hybrid 9 Figure 3 Schematic of Engine-Electric Hybrid 12 Figure 4 Schematic of Parallel Hybrid 13 Figure 5 Light Truck Sales Distribution 72 Figure 6 Series Scheme #1 82 Figure 7 Series Scheme #2 85 Figure 8 Series Scheme #3 89 Figure 9 Series Scheme #4 91 Figure 10 Parallel Scheme #1 93 Figure 1 1 Parallel Scheme #2 95 Figure 12 Parallel Scheme #3 98 Figure 13 Road Load vs. Temperature 105 Figure 14 Road Load vs. Wind Speed 106 Figure 15 Rolling Resistance vs. Speed 109 Figure 16 Vehicle on Grade 110 Figure 17 Road Load vs. Highway Grade 111 Figure 18 Road Load vs. Speed 112 VI List of Tables: Table 1 Selected UQM Motor Data 23 Table 2 USABC Goals 31 Table 3 Summary of Electrochemical Batteries 40 Table 4 Summary of Battery Technologies 45 Table 5 Sport Utility Comparison 77 Table 6 HE-SUV Specifications 79 Table 7 Series Scheme #1 83 Table 8 Series Scheme #2 86 Table 9 Series Scheme #3 90 Table 10 UQM Motor Data 90 Table 1 1 Series Scheme #4 92 Table 12 Parallel Scheme #1 94 Table 13 Parallel Scheme #2 96 Table 14 Parallel Scheme #3 99 Table 15 Battery Enclosure Issues 100 Table 16 1995 Sport Utility Data 102 Table 17 Rolling Resistance Coefficients 108 Table 18 Fuel Consumption 120 Table 19 Near-term Hybrid Components 123 Table 20 Mid-term Hybrid Components 125 VII List of Abbreviations: ABS Anti-lock Brakes APU Auxiliary Power Unit AAWD Adaptive All Wheel Drive AWD All Wheel Drive CARB California Air Resources Board CNG Compressed Natural Gas DOE United States Department of Energy EV Electric Vehicle EPA Environmental Protection Agency FFV Flexible Fuel Vehicle HEV Hybrid-Electric Vehicle HEVC Hybrid Electric Vehicle Challenge, student competition ICE Internal Combustion Engine LEV Low Emission Vehicle, defined by CARB LNG Liquid Natural Gas MCFC Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell PAFC Phosphoric Acid Fuel Cell PEM Proton Exchange Membrane PNGV Partnership for a New Generation Vehicle RFG Reformulated Gasoline SOC State of Charge SOFC Solid Oxide Fuel Cell ULEV Ultra-Low Emission Vehicle, defined by CARB USABC United States Advanced Battery Consortium ZEV Zero-Emission Vehicle VIII Introduction: As the remaining stocks of petroleum are steadily depleted, and smog and air pollution become extremely serious concerns, pressure is growing to evaluate our transportation systems. Two key objectives have been identified in response to these issues: reduction of oil consumption, and reduction of air pollution levels. The problem of air pollution has received serious investigation, and the automobile industry is among the first to be regulated. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) is leading the way by setting strict standards for allowable vehicle emissions in the state of California. The emissions standards progressively toughen from low emission vehicle (LEV) down to zero emission vehicle (ZEV), and a timeline has been established which dictates how many vehicles of each level may be sold each year. Many other governing bodies have adopted the California regulations or passed similar legislation to control the environmental performance of new vehicles (exhaust emissions and fuel consumption). The implications of these regulations and their effectiveness in controlling the environmental issues which they address is still the subject of active debate. The questions raised by these debates and the arguments set forth by all involved parties are well documented in other sources, and will not be addressed in this paper. Regardless of the debate, a new generation of vehicles is coming, and they promise to be very different from current automobiles. Attaining the improvements which are mandated in these regulations represents a challenging task. Much of the research and subsequent development of the diverse technologies which will be required is beyond the means of any single company. Many groups and consortiums have been formed to help distribute the work load. Nearly all of these groups represent a cooperative effort between government and industry. Since the government is mandating the speed with which these changes must occur1, it is assuming a key role in their development. The Hybrid Propulsion Plan is one such cooperative effort between the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the major U.S. automakers. The efforts of this group are aimed at the short term development of vehicles which can be available at the turn of the century. The main goal of all the projects is to increase the fuel economy and lower the exhaust emissions of new vehicles. Secondary goals involve the appropriate development of new technologies and alternative fuels to support future improvements in vehicle performance. Current research is laying the groundwork for the Partnership for a New Generation Vehicle (PNGV). This program is another joint venture between government and industry, and has ambitious goals such as tripling average fuel economy and improving safety and performance.
Recommended publications
  • Hybrid Electric Vehicles: a Review of Existing Configurations and Thermodynamic Cycles
    Review Hybrid Electric Vehicles: A Review of Existing Configurations and Thermodynamic Cycles Rogelio León , Christian Montaleza , José Luis Maldonado , Marcos Tostado-Véliz * and Francisco Jurado Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Jaén, EPS Linares, 23700 Jaén, Spain; [email protected] (R.L.); [email protected] (C.M.); [email protected] (J.L.M.); [email protected] (F.J.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-953-648580 Abstract: The mobility industry has experienced a fast evolution towards electric-based transport in recent years. Recently, hybrid electric vehicles, which combine electric and conventional combustion systems, have become the most popular alternative by far. This is due to longer autonomy and more extended refueling networks in comparison with the recharging points system, which is still quite limited in some countries. This paper aims to conduct a literature review on thermodynamic models of heat engines used in hybrid electric vehicles and their respective configurations for series, parallel and mixed powertrain. It will discuss the most important models of thermal energy in combustion engines such as the Otto, Atkinson and Miller cycles which are widely used in commercial hybrid electric vehicle models. In short, this work aims at serving as an illustrative but descriptive document, which may be valuable for multiple research and academic purposes. Keywords: hybrid electric vehicle; ignition engines; thermodynamic models; autonomy; hybrid configuration series-parallel-mixed; hybridization; micro-hybrid; mild-hybrid; full-hybrid Citation: León, R.; Montaleza, C.; Maldonado, J.L.; Tostado-Véliz, M.; Jurado, F. Hybrid Electric Vehicles: A Review of Existing Configurations 1. Introduction and Thermodynamic Cycles.
    [Show full text]
  • ICOM North American LLC Comments
    DOCKETED Docket 16-ALT-02 Number: Project Title: 2017-2018 Investment Plan Update for the Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program TN #: 214418 Document Title: ICOM North American LLC Comments: alt-fuel near zero engines and alt- fuel hybrids Description: N/A Filer: System Organization: ICOM North American LLC Submitter Role: Public Submission 11/7/2016 4:47:41 PM Date: Docketed Date: 11/7/2016 Comment Received From: jon vanbogart Submitted On: 11/7/2016 Docket Number: 16-ALT-02 alt-fuel near zero engines and alt-fuel hybrids Additional submitted attachment is included below. November 7, 2016 California Energy Commission 1516 Ninth Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Re: Comments on the 2017-2018 Investment Plan Update for the Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program Dear California Energy Commissioners and Staff, ICOM North America LLC values the opportunity to provide comments on the 2017-2018 Investment Plan Update for the Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program (ARFVTP). While we support the Energy Commission goals and investment in advanced transportation technologies to advance petroleum reduction goals and reduce emission for the State’s climate change initiatives. Near Zero – Lower NOx Engines and Alternative Fuel Hybrid Technology ICOM has provided sustainable fleets solutions for Propane-Autogas since 2004 with over 150 EPA certification covering more than 1000 vehicle platforms. As part of our 2017 strategy and beyond, ICOM will be offering CARB Certified Near Zero - Lower NOx engine technology for both Propane-AutoGas and CNG at or near the 0.02 NOx level for vehicle platforms above 14001 GVWR for both the Ford 6.8L and GM 6.0L engines.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcript of August 4, 2020 Session 2 Commissioner Workshop on Plug
    DOCKETED Docket Number: 20-IEPR-02 Project Title: Transportation TN #: 235911 Transcript of August 4, 2020 Session 2 Commissioner Document Title: Workshop on Plug-in Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Description: N/A Filer: Cody Goldthrite Organization: California Energy Commission Submitter Role: Commission Staff Submission Date: 12/10/2020 3:21:05 PM Docketed Date: 12/10/2020 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION In the matter of: 2020 Integrated Energy ) Docket No. 20-IEPR–02 Policy Report Update ) (2020 IEPR Update) ) _________________________) COMMISSIONER WORKSHOP ON PLUG-IN ELECTRIC VEHICLES CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE REMOTE VIA ZOOM SESSION 2: TUESDAY, AUGUST 4, 2020 2:30 P.M. Reported by: Martha Nelson 1 California Reporting, LLC (510) 313-0610 APPEARANCES COMMISSIONERS Patricia Monahan, 2020 IEPR Update Lead Commissioner CEC STAFF Heather Raitt, IEPR Program Manager Jonathan Bobadilla PUBLIC ADVISOR RoseMary Avalos MODERATOR Tim Olson, California Energy Commission PRESENTER Paul Francis, KIGT Noel Crisostomo, California Energy Commission Micah Wofford, California Energy Commission PUBLIC COMMENT Lisa McGhee, GreenPower Motor Company Stacey Reineccius, Powertree Services, Inc. Nicholas Johnson, Orange Charger Rajiv Shah, FreeWire Technologies 2 California Reporting, LLC (510) 313-0610 AGENDA Page Introduction 4 Opening Remarks 5 Commissioner Monahan Chair Hochschild Commissioner McAllister Commissioner Douglas Fostering Advanced Technology to Meet Future 8 Light-Duty Vehicle Needs Paul Francis, KIGT Charging Equipment Hardware and Software 29 Noel Crisostomo, CEC EVSE Deployment and Grid Evaluation (EDGE) Tool 44 Micah Wofford, CEC Other Charging Programs to Accelerate Electric 61 Vehicle Adoption Noel Crisostomo, CEC Public Comments 87 Closing Comments 95 Adjourn 96 1 3 California Reporting, LLC (510) 313-0610 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 2: 30 P.M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hybrid Vehicle and Alternative Fuel Report September 30, 2016
    ISSN 1946-1011 The Hybrid Vehicle and Alternative Fuel Report September 30, 2016 The fine print: This report is a summary of articles appearing in popular, business, and technical media referring to the impact of fuel costs and fuel efficiency on vehicle technology, development, and markets. At the end of the report is a list of all articles summarized, with hyperlinks to internet sources where available. Some articles may require free registration or paid subscriptions to access. The Hybrid Vehicle and Alternative Fuel Report (ISSN: 1946-1011) is compiled, written, and edited by Thomas L. R. Smith, Ph. D. (hereinafter referred to as “The Editor”), Economic Analysis Branch of the Budget and Financial Analysis Division, Washington State Department of Transportation. Contact The Hybrid Vehicle and Alternative Fuel Report’s editor at [email protected] or (360) 705-7941. Contributions of news items, original articles, cookies, and positive comments about The Report are welcome. TABLE OF CONTENTS HYBRIDS .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 ELECTRIC VEHICLES ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 ALTERNATIVE FUELS ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 COMING TO A LOCATION NEAR YOU
    [Show full text]
  • EPRI Journal--Driving the Solution: the Plug-In Hybrid Vehicle
    DRIVING THE SOLUTION THE PLUG-IN HYBRID VEHICLE by Lucy Sanna The Story in Brief As automakers gear up to satisfy a growing market for fuel-efficient hybrid electric vehicles, the next- generation hybrid is already cruis- ing city streets, and it can literally run on empty. The plug-in hybrid charges directly from the electricity grid, but unlike its electric vehicle brethren, it sports a liquid fuel tank for unlimited driving range. The technology is here, the electricity infrastructure is in place, and the plug-in hybrid offers a key to replacing foreign oil with domestic resources for energy indepen- dence, reduced CO2 emissions, and lower fuel costs. DRIVING THE SOLUTION THE PLUG-IN HYBRID VEHICLE by Lucy Sanna n November 2005, the first few proto­ vide a variety of battery options tailored 2004, more than half of which came from Itype plug­in hybrid electric vehicles to specific applications—vehicles that can imports. (PHEVs) will roll onto the streets of New run 20, 30, or even more electric miles.” With growing global demand, particu­ York City, Kansas City, and Los Angeles Until recently, however, even those larly from China and India, the price of a to demonstrate plug­in hybrid technology automakers engaged in conventional barrel of oil is climbing at an unprece­ in varied environments. Like hybrid vehi­ hybrid technology have been reluctant to dented rate. The added cost and vulnera­ cles on the market today, the plug­in embrace the PHEV, despite growing rec­ bility of relying on a strategic energy hybrid uses battery power to supplement ognition of the vehicle’s potential.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Vehicle Demonstration Projects In
    ELECTRIC VEHICLE DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS IN THE UNITED STATES Prepared For TEKES The Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation NWV Market Discovery, Inc. 20781 Evergreen Mills Road · Leesburg, VA 20175, USA Tel 1-703-777-1727 · Cell 1-703-909-0603 · URL: www.nwv.com CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES ________________________________________ 4 2. INTRODUCTION ____________________________________________________ 6 2.1. POLITICAL CONTEXT _________________________________________________ 6 2.2. ELECTRICAL CAR MANUFACTURERS ___________________________________ 7 2.3. MUNICIPALITIES _____________________________________________________ 7 2.4. INFRASTRUCTURE ___________________________________________________ 7 2.5. TECHNOLOGY & COMPONENT SUPPLIERS______________________________ 9 2.6. RETAIL, SALES & CONSUMER SERVICE _________________________________ 9 2.7. FUNDING ___________________________________________________________ 9 2.8. INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION ___________________________________ 10 2.9. GLOBAL INITIATIVES ________________________________________________ 10 2.10. SOURCES __________________________________________________________ 12 3. DEMONSTRATION & TEST PROJECTS _________________________________ 13 3.1. THE EV PROJECT ___________________________________________________ 13 3.2. PROJECT PLUG - IN _________________________________________________ 18 3.3. USPS PILOT PROGRAM “CONVERT LLVs TO EVs”_______________________ 23 3.4. PORT OF LOS ANGELES ELECTRIC TRUCK DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS ___ 26 3.5. SDG&E CTP EV DEMONSTRATION
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Range Extenders in Battery Electric Vehicles: Current Progress and Future Perspectives
    Review A Review of Range Extenders in Battery Electric Vehicles: Current Progress and Future Perspectives Manh-Kien Tran 1,* , Asad Bhatti 2, Reid Vrolyk 1, Derek Wong 1 , Satyam Panchal 2 , Michael Fowler 1 and Roydon Fraser 2 1 Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L3G1, Canada; [email protected] (R.V.); [email protected] (D.W.); [email protected] (M.F.) 2 Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L3G1, Canada; [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (S.P.); [email protected] (R.F.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-519-880-6108 Abstract: Emissions from the transportation sector are significant contributors to climate change and health problems because of the common use of gasoline vehicles. Countries in the world are attempting to transition away from gasoline vehicles and to electric vehicles (EVs), in order to reduce emissions. However, there are several practical limitations with EVs, one of which is the “range anxiety” issue, due to the lack of charging infrastructure, the high cost of long-ranged EVs, and the limited range of affordable EVs. One potential solution to the range anxiety problem is the use of range extenders, to extend the driving range of EVs while optimizing the costs and performance of the vehicles. This paper provides a comprehensive review of different types of EV range extending technologies, including internal combustion engines, free-piston linear generators, fuel cells, micro Citation: Tran, M.-K.; Bhatti, A.; gas turbines, and zinc-air batteries, outlining their definitions, working mechanisms, and some recent Vrolyk, R.; Wong, D.; Panchal, S.; Fowler, M.; Fraser, R.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Analysis of Well-To-Wheel Primary Energy
    Journal of Power Sources 249 (2014) 333e348 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Power Sources journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jpowsour A comparative analysis of well-to-wheel primary energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions for the operation of alternative and conventional vehicles in Switzerland, considering various energy carrier production pathways Mashael Yazdanie*, Fabrizio Noembrini, Lionel Dossetto, Konstantinos Boulouchos Aerothermochemistry and Combustion Systems Laboratory, Institute of Energy Technology, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, ML J41.3, Sonneggstrasse 3, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland highlights Operational GHG emissions and energy demand are found for alternative drivetrains. Well-to-wheel results are compared for several H2/electricity production pathways. Pluggable electric cars (PECs) yield the lowest WTW GHG emissions and energy demand. Fuel cell car WTW results are on par with PECs for direct chemical H2 production. ICE and hybrid cars using biogas and CNG also yield some of the lowest WTW results. article info abstract Article history: This study provides a comprehensive analysis of well-to-wheel (WTW) primary energy demand and Received 4 June 2013 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for the operation of conventional and alternative passenger vehicle Received in revised form drivetrains. Results are determined based on a reference vehicle, drivetrain/production process effi- 9 September 2013 ciencies, and lifecycle inventory data specific to Switzerland. WTW performance is compared to a gas- Accepted 12 October 2013 oline internal combustion engine vehicle (ICEV). Both industrialized and novel hydrogen and electricity Available online 21 October 2013 production pathways are evaluated. A strong case is presented for pluggable electric vehicles (PEVs) due to their high drivetrain efficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • Prospects for Bi-Fuel and Flex-Fuel Light Duty Vehicles
    Prospects for Bi-Fuel and Flex-Fuel Light-Duty Vehicles An MIT Energy Initiative Symposium April 19, 2012 MIT Energy Initiative Symposium on Prospects for Bi-Fuel and Flex-Fuel Light-Duty Vehicles | April 19, 2012 C Prospects for Bi-Fuel and Flex-Fuel Light-Duty Vehicles An MIT Energy Initiative Symposium April 19, 2012 ABOUT THE REPORT Summary for Policy Makers The April 19, 2012, MIT Energy Initiative Symposium addressed Prospects for Bi-Fuel and Flex-Fuel Light-Duty Vehicles. The symposium focused on natural gas, biofuels, and motor gasoline as fuels for light-duty vehicles (LDVs) with a time horizon of the next two to three decades. The important transportation alternatives of electric and hybrid vehicles (this was the subject of the 2010 MITEi Symposium1) and hydrogen/fuel-cell vehicles, a longer-term alternative, were not considered. There are three motivations for examining alternative transportation fuels for LDVs: (1) lower life cycle cost of transportation for the consumer, (2) reduction in the greenhouse gas (GHG) footprint of the transportation sector (an important contributor to total US GHG emissions), and (3) improved energy security resulting from greater use of domestic fuels and reduced liquid fuel imports. An underlying question is whether a flex-fuel/bi-fuel mandate for new LDVs would drive development of a robust alternative fuels market and infrastructure versus alternative fuel use requirements. Symposium participants agreed on these motivations. However, in this symposium in contrast to past symposiums, there was a striking lack of agreement about the direction to which the market might evolve, about the most promising technologies, and about desirable government action.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Vehicle Infrastructure for the Monterey Bay Area the Associa on of Monterey Bay Area Governments August 2013
    E V Electric Vehicle Infrastructure for the Monterey Bay Area The Associa on of Monterey Bay Area Governments August 2013 The prepara on of this document was funded by a grant awarded by the Monterey Bay Unifi ed Air Pollu on Control District (MUAPCD), as part of the AB2766 program. Project Staff Alan Romero, Monterey Bay Unifi ed Air Pollu on Control District (MBUAPCD) AMBAG Dawn Mathes, Monterey County Resource Management Agency (RMA) Paul Hierling, Planner Carl P. Holm, Monterey County RMA Cody Meyer, Planner Craig Spencer, Monterey County RMA Anais Schenk, Planner Mario Salazar, Monterey County RMA Jason Adelaars, GIS Michael Ricker, City of Salinas Ecology Ac on Veronica Lezama, San Benito Council of Piet Canin, Vice President, Transporta on Governments Group Tegan Speiser, Santa Cruz County RTC Emily Glanville, Program Specialist Michael Zeller, TAMC Monterey Bay Unifi ed Air James Wasserman, Zero Motorcycles, Plug- Pollu on Control District In America Alan Romero, Air Quality Planner III Megan Tolbert, CSU Monterey Bay EV Communi es Alliance Piet Canin, Ecology Ac on Richard Corcoran, PEV Owner Richard Schorske, CEO Teresa Buika, UC Santa Cruz Previous staff contributors Richard Schorske, EV Communi es Alliance John Doughty Randy Deshazo, Principal Planner Linda Meckel, Planner, Project Manager MBEVA Plug-In Electric Vehicle Coordina ng Council Sharon Sarris, Green Fuse Energy Kris Markey, Offi ce of Monterey County Supervisor Parker Andy Hartmann, Interna onal Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Cheryl Schmi , City of Santa Cruz For more informa on regarding this study, contact Anais Schenk at [email protected] 2 E V Electric Vehicle Infrastructure for the Monterey Bay Area Execu ve Summary..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • EV World Update
    http://evworld.com/newsletter/update_premium2008.cfm 10/1/09 3:54 PM EDITION: 9.40 | 27 Sep 2009 Platinum Sponsors INSIDER COMMENTARY Corporate Sponsorship Info CURRENTS Canadian Healthcare and Electric Cars The Canadian healthcare system didn't happen by fiat, it had to be fought for and the man leading the fight was a Saskatchewan minister turned politician. 30 Sep 2009 The Most Expensive Car on the Block He owns Toronto Electric, manufacturers of industrial cranes and electric motors. And now, after two years development, he also owns one of the neatest little EVs this side of the Canadian-U.S. border. 28 Sep 2009 Lithium From A Canadian Perspective Canadian Lithium Corp's Kerry Knoll discusses at PHEV'09 the prospects for lithium production as the auto industry moves to introduce electric cars requiring this lightest of all metals. 28 Sep 2009 PHOTO OF THE WEEK: Yike Bike has to be one of the most innovative electric bicycles yet developed. Constructed of carbon fiber, the electric bicycle weighs just 10 Of Dysprosium, Neodymium and kg (22 lbs). Powered by lithium ferrous phosphate batteries, the Yike has a top speed Other Wrinkles of 20 km/hr and range up to 10 km. Maximum carrying capacity is 100 kg (220 lbs). More than 40 electric cars debuted in Watch the YouTube Yike Bike video here. Frankfurt, a clear indication that we're on the road towards an EV World, but bumps, potholes and potential detours still lie ahead. 27 Sep 2009 In This Edition: My Montreal Keynote FEATURED THIS WEEK AONE Surprise Are We Ready for 2012? Detroit Moves
    [Show full text]
  • Employer Recruitment List for Industrial Engineering 2017-2018
    ecs.wisc.edu 1150 Engineering Hall Employer Recruitment List for Industrial Engineering 2017-2018 Fall Spring Employer Entry Co-op Intern Entry Co-op Intern Degree Work Auth. 3M X X BS AC Propulsion, Inc.* X X X BS, MS, PhD May sponsor Accenture X BS, MS, PhD Accuray* X BS, MS, PhD ACS* X BS ACS Group* X X BS Actuant/Enerpac Corporation* X X BS Akuna Capital* X BS, MS, PhD Alicona Corporation* X BS Alto-Shaam* X BS Amcor Flexibles X BS American Orthodontics X X BS Andersen Corp. /Windows & Doors X BS Aptar Mukwonago X X BS Aquilon Energy Services* X BS Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP* X X BS Bemis Company, Inc. X BS BlackEdge Capital* X BS Blattner Energy, Inc X BS Bloomberg* X X BS, MS, PhD May sponsor Boston Scientific X X BS Brady Corp. X X BS BRP US Inc. X X BS Brunk Industries, Inc.* X X BS Capital One Financial Services X X BS, MS Cardinal Health* X X BS Cargill X BS Caterpillar, Inc. X X BS, MS, PhD Clark Construction X BS, MS Clasen Quality Chocolate* X X BS Cummins X X BS, MS May sponsor Deloitte Consulting X X BS May sponsor Deloitte Services* X X BS, MS May sponsor Discover Financial Services X BS Domtar X BS DrJ Engineering X X X BS, MS, PhD May sponsor Eaton Corp. X BS Ecolab, Inc. X X X X X X BS Emerson X X X X BS Enerpac X X X BS Epic* X X BS, MS, PhD EpiWorks* X X BS Expera Speciality Solutions X X X BS, MS Exponent* X PhD Extreme Engineering Solutions* X X BS, MS ExxonMobil X X X BS EY X X MS, PhD May sponsor Fairbanks Morse Engine, an Enpro X BS, MS Industries company* Fiat-Chrysler X BS Fisher-Barton Group* X X BS, MS, PhD FM Global - Chicago* X X BS Focal Point* X BS, MS Ford Motor Company X BS, MS, PhD Foth Companies* X BS Fuller, HB Co.
    [Show full text]